DOCSLIB.ORG

Billings. Montana October 29. 1948 Mr. C. G. Kegel. Deputy U. S. Distri Ct

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Billings. Montana October 29. 1948 Mr. C. G. Kegel. Deputy U. S. Distri Ct Reproduced at the National Archives ~~<:;eattle. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR MONTANA Billings. Montana October 29. 1948 Mr. C. G. Kegel. Deputy U. S. Distri ct Court Federal Bui lding Great Falls. Montana Re: U. s. ~~ L. Va!LCleve....._~ a1- Dear Keg: Enclosed please find original complaint and two copi es'lt.ner-eor , Please file the origina 1 complaint and issue summons, and advi se us of the date of filing and the number assigned. You will also find enclosed an or-tgdna L and two copies of a notice of application for preliminary in- I junction which should be delivered to the Marshal, asking the Marshal to serve the original summons and the original notice upon each of the defendants by delivering to them, and each of them, a copy of the summons, complaint and order. The post o1'fice address of the defendants is Melville, Montana, but I believe that they are still residing upon the Van Cleve ranch situated in the Big Timber Canyon some thirty miles north of Big Timber, Montana. Service upon the defendant corporation may be made by service upon Helen P. Van Cleve, Who is the major stockholder of said corporation and the wife of the defendant Paul L. Van Cleve, Jr. I or service may be made upon the defendant corporation by s er vLng Paul L. Van Cleve I Jr., who is the active business manager of the defendant corporation • .This is an action to obtain a declaratory judg- ment to establish the existence of a public road and trail through and upon the lands owned by the defendants. .Reproduced at the Nationa' Archives a: ~eattle, Mr. C. G. Kegel, Deputy October 29, 1948 Page 2 It is probable that The Great Falls Tribune would be interested in the :filing of this complaint for the reason that the' defendant is the presi dent of the Dude Ranchers Association, and for the further reason that all Rod and GunClubs in Montana are parti cularly interested in the filing of this action because of the inabili ty of vacationers and sportsmen to use the road and highway as a means of access to public recreational areas constructed by the Forest Service and as a means of access to fishing and hunting areas in the Crazy Mountains north of Big Timber. Weare also advised that there are other land owners in Montana whoare contemplating the same action as this defendant if he is sucqessful in appropriating the road and trail, This of fice is indebted to the cooperative efforts of Senator James E. Murray and John W. Bonner in fur- nishing us with the in:formation and assistance necessary in order to properly present this JlIa. tter to the court. Sincerely yours, FRANKLIN A. LAMB Assistant U. S. Attorney FAL:nm Enclosures 0 1;---- - \ I N IN THEDISTRICT COURTOJ!'THE UNITEDSTATES IN ANDFOR THEDISTRICT OF MONTANA FILED BILUNGS DIVISION rn OCT 301948 UNITEDSTATESOFAMERICA, H. Plaintiff, ---------COMPLAINT v. PAULL. VilN CLEVE,JR.; and THEVJl.l"J CLl!."'VECOMPANY,INC., a Corporation., Defendant s , COlVIESNOWthe Uni ted states of .America, by and through John B. T~nsil,~.as Uni ted States Attorney, and Franklin A. Lamb, as Assistant United States Attorney, in and for the ..District of Montana,and for its cause of action, complains and alleges: I This is an- action brought by the United States of America pursuant to the provisions of Rule 57, Federal Rules of Civil pro- cedure and Title 28, Section 2201, U.S.C.A., for and on behalf of the general pubLio of the United states and officers and employees of the United States of America because there is an actual contro- versy now exd sti.ng in respect of which the plaintiff needs a declaration of rights by this Court. II That The Van Cleve Company, Lnc , , is a corporation duly organized and authorized to do business under the laws of the state of Montana, with its principal place of business at Melville, Montana. III That for more than fifty (50) years there has been and now is a publie road or highway and trail known as the Big Timber Canyon or Big Timber Creek road and trail extending across the eastern boundary of the Gallatin National Forest on the east line of the e \ I Northeast Quarter of the Northeast ~arter (NEiNE!) of Section Twelve (12), Township Three North (3N) Range Twelve East (12E) and continuing in 'a westerly direction across the North line of the Northeast Quarter of the Nor t heasrt Q.uarter (NEiNE!) of said Section Twelve (12) and e xt end ing through and across Sections One (1), Two (2), Three (3), Four (4), Five (5) and Six (6) all in Township Three North (3N), Range Twelve East (12E) in Sweet Grass County, Montana, and crossing the Park and Sweet Grass County line and then extending in a north and westerly general direction to a point near the center of Township Four North (4N), Range Eleven East (lIE) in Park County, Montana, where it joins the Sweet Grass Creek Trail. IV That the defendants own lands in Sections One (1), Two (2), Three (3)' and Five (5), in Township Three North (3N), Range Twelve East (12E) in Sweet Grass County, Mont.ana-, over which said pu bLi c road or highway and trail was, at all times herein mentioned and now is, situated, all within the District of Montana and wi thin the jurisdiction of this Court. V That since the year 1940, "t.he defendants have.attempted to interfere and have interferred with the usage of said road or highway arid trail by the officers and employees of the Forest Service of the Department of Agriculture, a Department 'of the Uni ted States of America, in the performance of their official duties as such officers and employees in the administration and protection of the Gallatin National Forest. VI That since the year 1940, the defendants 'have attempted to interfere, restrain, bar and prohibit and have interferred, re- strained, barred and prohibited members of the general public from the free and unimpeded usage of said publ i o road or highway and trail as. a means of access to recreational areas and camp ground parks and facilities provi ded by the Forest Service of the United -2- \ ",- ~ V''" States and the general usage and enjoyment of that portion of the Gallatin National Forest. VII That the defendants have maintained and do now maintain locked gates across said public road or highway and trail and have maintained and do now maintain signs of various kinds and nature claiming and identifying said public road or highway and trail as a private road and prohibiting any trespassing on the lands to the west of said signs and gates j That the defendants have refused and do now refuse to premit membersof the general public to pass through said locked gates along said public road or highway and trail and have threatened and continue to threaten to restrain and interfere with the f'ree and unimpeded usage thereof by officers and employees of the Forest Service of the United States. VIII That by reason of the conduct and actions of the defendants, an actual controversy exists between the defendants and members'of the general public of the United states and officers and employees of the Forest Service, a Department of the United states of America, concerning the free and unimpeded right of usage of' said road, high- way and trail and concerning the status and character of said public road, highway and trai 1. WHEREFORE,plaintiff prays: 1. That an injunction be issued out of' this court directed to the defendants and their employees, attorneys, agents and those acting in concert with them or any of them, restraining and enjoining each of them during the pendency of this action from maintaining gates, locks or chains interferring or tending to interfere or impede the free usage of- the road, highway or trail or the gates situated thereon by members of the general public or off'icers or employees of the ]'orest service of the Pnited States of -3- '" ." \ / America, and from maintaining signs of any character importing to convey the meaning or impression that said road is a private road or that travel thereon or usage thereof is in any manner prohibited· or restricted. 2. That judg'ment be entered herein declaring said road or highway and trail to be a public road, highway and trai 1 and as such is a right-of-way upon, over and across the lands owned or controlled by the defendants, and that the defendants, upon the final determination of this action, be permanently restrained and enjoined from doing any act or thing tending to interfere in any manner with the free and unimpeded usage of said road, highway or trail by members of the general public or officers and employees of the Government of the Uni ted states of America. 3. That plaintiff have judgment for its costs of suit and for such other and further relief as may be just and proper. JuflN B. TANSIL :Attorney0ftheUnited States-;iii and for the District of "Montana. ',,' ,'" ~.dr '" _..I. ...I"'.. J'.' u~d~ ASSl tantAttorneyoftfiS-uni ted states, in and for the District of Montana. -4- \ D. C. l!'orDl No, 1..':i HUll. /' SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION ~ iii (J'• 1ilinfrid QI:ourt of flIt lluifrb ~fa:ttg FOR THE .• _.... .. DISTRICT OF _ Mon~l'l:!1a_:_._.__ __B.U.lj"DEfL. DIVISION / • CIVIL ACTION FILE No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Table of Contents Chapter 1.0 the Growth Policy
    TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1.0 THE GROWTH POLICY ............................................... 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................1 1.2 STATEMENT OF INTENT......................................................................................1 1.4 PREPARATION OF THE GROWTH POLICY ........................................................1 1.4.1 GETTING STARTED ..........................................................................1 1.4.2 REAFFIRMATION OF EXISTING GOALS.................................................2 1.4.3 IDENTIFICATION OF ISSUES, NEEDS AND PREFERENCES.......................3 1.4.4 POLICY DEVELOPMENT .....................................................................4 1.5 GROWTH POLICY ADMINISTRATION...............................................................5 1.5.1 IMPLEMENTATION ...........................................................................5 1.5.2 CONDITIONS FOR GROWTH POLICY REVISIONS ...................................5 1.5.3 TIMETABLE FOR REVIEW...................................................................5 1.5.4 COOPERATION WITH CITY OF BIG TIMBER ..........................................6 1.5.5 CITY-COUNTY PLANNING BOARD JURISDICTION .................................6 CHAPTER 2.0 COUNTY HISTORY AND DESCRIPTION ........................... 7 2.1 COUNTY HISTORY ..............................................................................................7 2.2 AREA DESCRIPTIONS........................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Survey of Sweet Grass County Area, Montana
    How to Use This Soil Survey Detailed Soil Maps The detailed soil maps can be useful in planning the use and management of small areas. To find information about your area of interest, you can locate the Section, Township, and Range by zooming in on the Index to Map Sheets, or you can go to the Web Soil Survey at (http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/). Note the map unit symbols that are in that area. The Contents lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. See the Contents for sections of this publication that may address your specific needs. ii This soil survey is a publication of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Major fieldwork for this soil survey was completed in 1997. Soil names and descriptions were approved in 1997. Unless otherwise indicated, statements in this publication refer to conditions in the survey area in 1997. This survey was made cooperatively by the Natural Resources Conservation Service and the Montana Agricultural Experiment Station. It is part of the technical assistance furnished to the Sweet Grass County Conservation District. The most current official data are available through the NRCS Soil Data Mart website at http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov. Soil maps in this survey may be copied without permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Crazy Mountains Complaint
    Case 1:19-cv-00066-SPW-TJC Document 1 Filed 06/10/19 Page 1 of 114 Matthew K. Bishop Western Environmental Law Center 103 Reeder’s Alley Helena, Montana 59601 406-324-8011 [email protected] Michael A. Kauffman DRAKE LAW FIRM, P.C. 111 North Last Chance Gulch Suite 3J, Arcade Building Helena, MT 59601 406-495-8080 [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiffs IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION FRIENDS OF THE CRAZY MOUNTAINS, a public land No. organization; MONTANA CHAPTER BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS AND COMPLAINT FOR ANGLERS, a non-profit DECLARATORY AND organization; ENHANCING INJUNCTIVE RELIEF MONTANA’S WILDLIFE AND HABITAT, a public outreach organization; SKYLINE SPORTSMEN’S ASSOCIATION, a non-profit organization, Plaintiffs, vs. 1 Case 1:19-cv-00066-SPW-TJC Document 1 Filed 06/10/19 Page 2 of 114 MARY ERICKSON, in her official capacity as Forest Supervisor for the Custer Gallatin National Forest; LEANNE MARTEN, in her official capacity as Regional Forester, Region One, for the U.S. Forest Service; VICKI CHRISTIANSEN, in her official capacity as chief of the U.S. Forest Service; THE UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a federal agency; THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, a federal department, Federal-Defendants. INTRODUCTION 1. Friends of the Crazy Mountains, the Montana Chapter of Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, Enhancing Montana’s Wildlife and Habitat, and the Skyline Sportsmen’s Association (collectively “Plaintiffs”), bring this civil action for declaratory and injunctive relief against Federal-Defendants (“the U.S. Forest Service” or “the Service”) pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings for Collaborative Science
    Proceedings for Collaborative Science American Water Resources Association Montana Section 2018 Conference October 17 - October 19, 2018 Holiday Inn West Yellowstone-- West Yellowstone, Montana Contents Thanks to Planners and Sponsors Full Meeting Agenda About the Keynote Speakers Concurrent Session and Poster Abstracts* Session 1. Ecology Session 2. Hydrology Session 3. Environmental Chemistry Session 4. Water Quality Session 5. Management and Restoration Session 6. Collaboration Session 7. Modeling Session 8. Climate Poster Session *These abstracts were not edited and appear as submitted by the author, except for some changes in font and format. 1 THANKS TO ALL WHO MAKE THIS EVENT POSSIBLE! • The AWRA Officers Emilie Erich Hoffman, President -- Montana DEQ Melissa Schaar, Vice President -- Montana DNRC Kim Snodgrass, Treasurer -- Water and Environmental Technologies Nancy Hystad, Executive Secretary -- Montana State University • Montana Water Center, Meeting Coordination Wyatt Cross, Director, and Whitney Lonsdale, Assistant Director And especially the conference presenters, field trip leaders, moderators, student judges and volunteers. Emilie Erich Hoffman Melissa Schaar Kim Snodgrass Nancy Hystad 2 3 WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2018 REGISTRATION 9:30 am – 7:00 pm REGISTRATION Preconference registration available at water.montana.edu/awra/registration/ WORKSHOP, FIELD TRIP and HYDROPHILE RUN 10:00 am - 12:00 pm Communication Workshop: Effective Presentation Training (please register) Led by MT State Professional Development Center 1:00
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Plac Registration Form
    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024^4)018 (Rev. Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLAC REGISTRATION FORM 1. Name of Property historic name: Harrison, Waborn (Wabe) and Sarah E., Ranch House other name/site number: 2. Location street & number: not for publication: n/a vicinity: X city/town: Greycliff state: Montana code: MT county: Sweet Grass code: 097 zip code: 59033 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the Na tional Historic Preservation Act of 1 986, as amende d, I hereby certify that this X nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the docijmentation standards for registering properties in th< 3 National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedurgJ.aRd-^iofea5iuiiji>trfgmii(fc!iriBrH( • set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the prc oertv X meets does not meet the National Reaister Criteria^" 1 recommend ttfa"t this ipVopertyH )e considered significant _ nationally _ statewide X locally. V^^ ^^*~.^^ X-—S- ^~~"—•—••»•.• — — - — - "miiiiii_ ^ Signature of certifying official/Title ' Date Montana State Historic Preservation Office State or Federal agency or bureau ( _ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) In my opinion, the property _ '_ meets _ does not meet the National Register criteria. Signature of commenting or other official Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. National Park Service Certification I, heieby certify that this property is: ^/entered in the National Register _ see continuation sheet _ determined eligible for the National Register _ see continuation sheet _ determined not eligible for the National Register _ see continuation sheet _ removed from the National Register _see continuation sheet_ other (explain): ____ Harrison.
    [Show full text]
  • Dnrc Summary Report Sb330 Water Reservation Ten Year Review
    DNRC SUMMARY REPORT SB330 WATER RESERVATION TEN YEAR REVIEW June 2016 Water Resource Division Water Rights Bureau 1424 9th Avenue P.O. Box 201601 Helena, Montana 59620-1601 http://dnrc.mt.gov/divisions/water/water-rights for questions call (406) 444-6614 TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Description .............................................................................. …….. 1 Municipal Reservations ……………………………………………………………………………. 2 Yellowstone Final Order ..................................................................... 3 Lower Missouri Final Order................................................................. 5 Upper Missouri Final Order ................................................................. 6 Conservation District Reservations ……………………………………………………………. 8 Yellowstone Final Order …………………………………………………………………. 9 Lower Missouri Final Order …………………………………………………………….. 10 Upper Missouri Final Order …………………………………………………………….. 11 State & Federal Reservations ……………………………………………………………………. 11 Yellowstone Final Order …………………………………………………………………. 12 Upper Missouri Final Order ……………………………………………………………. 13 Appendix A, (Yellowstone Municipal Reservations).…………………………………. 14 Big Timber .......................................................................................…. 15 Billings ................................................................................................. 19 Broadus ............................................................................................... 23 Columbus ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Chapter 1.0 the Growth Policy
    TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1.0 THE GROWTH POLICY .......................................................................... 5 1.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 5 1.2 STATEMENT OF INTENT ...................................................................................... 5 1.3 PREPARATION OF THE GROWTH POLICY ......................................................... 5 1.3.1 GETTING STARTED ...................................................................................... 5 1.3.2 IDENTIFICATION OF ISSUES, NEEDS AND PREFERENCES .................................. 5 1.3.3 POLICY DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................. 6 1.4 GROWTH POLICY ADMINISTRATION ............................................................... 6 1.4.1 IMPLEMENTATION ....................................................................................... 6 1.4.2 CONDITIONS FOR GROWTH POLICY REVISIONS ............................................... 6 1.4.3 TIMETABLE FOR REVIEW .............................................................................. 6 1.4.4 COORDINATION WITH OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES ............................... 7 1.4.5 CITY-COUNTY PLANNING BOARD JURISDICTION ............................................. 4 CHAPTER 2.0 COUNTY HISTORY AND DESCRIPTION ................................................ 9 2.1 COUNTY HISTORY .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sweet Grass County Long Range Plan 2019
    MONTANA Focused Conservation SWEET GRASS COUNTY LONG-RANGE PLAN December 2019 1 Table of Contents Section I – Introduction……………………………………………………………………5 Section II – Natural Resources Inventory………………………………………………5 Humans………………………………………………………………………………5 General………………………………………………………………………5 History………………………………………………………………………..5 Land Cover/Land Use………………………………………………………7 Land Ownership……………………………………………………………..8 Demographics……………………………………………………………….8 Agricultural Profile…………………………………………………………..9 Physiography/Drainage…………………………………………………………...9 Geology/Soils………………………………………………………………………10 Climate………………………………………………………………………………10 Water…………………………………………………………………………………11 General………………………………………………………………………11 Irrigation……………………………………………………………………..11 Livestock Water……………………………………………………………..12 Water Quality………………………………………………………………..13 Air and Energy……………………………………………………………………...14 Non-attainment and Maintenance Areas for Air Quality Standards……14 Visibility Standards………………………………………………………….14 Utility/Power Company Coverage…………………………………………15 Wind…………………………………………………………………………..15 Plants…………………………………………………………………………………15 General……………………………………………………………………….15 Rangeland……………………………………………………………………15 Introduced Species Pasture………………………………………………..16 Riparian Areas……………………………………………………………….16 Forest…………………………………………………………………………16 Sensitive or Declining Plant Communities………………………………..17 Invasive Species…………………………………………………………….17 Animals……………………………………………………………………………….17 Animal Feeding Operations (AFOs)……………………………………….17 Fish……………………………………………………………………………18 Wildlife………………………………………………………………………...18
    [Show full text]
  • Madison County Sheriff's Office Continues Investigations of Thefts, Burglaries County Planning Board Drafts Pre- Construction
    OUTPOST EVENTS CALENDAR For up-to-date local events Page C1 & C4 THE LOCAL NEWS OF THE MADISON VALLEY, RUBY VALLEY AND SURROUNDING AREAS Montana’s Oldest Publishing Weekly Newspaper. Established 1873 75¢ | Volume 141, Issue 40 www.madisoniannews.com Thursday, August 1, 2013 21st Century County planning Community Learning Center board drafts pre- construction safety form Faith Moldan ers but also their neighbors and The Madisonian surrounding community. [email protected] Big Sky uses a similar form, which was instituted after Development and construc- issues occurred while respond- tion processes entail a large ing to calls. Homes either had amount of activity and plan- driveways that were inaccessi- ning. Sometimes floorplans and ble or had an incorrect address. paint colors take precedence Sometimes fire officials had no over safety considerations. idea the home was even there. Fire officials at Monday Challenges like that do not al- night’s Madison County Plan- low for speedy response time, ning Board meeting said they Madison County Planning Di- like to see property owners who rector Charity Fechter said. take care of their own property “It’s simply a matter of pub- and safety, which most property lic safety,” Fechter said. owners do. However, those who The review form needs Photo by Faith Moldan do not take care of their prop- to be revised and finalized by Incoming kindergarten students chat while working on an alphabet project. erty and safety make it difficult Fechter, the planning board and and less enticing for crews to director of emergency manage- respond to a call that may put ment, Chris Mumme.
    [Show full text]
  • SWEET GRASS CREEK Water Supply and Storage Potential Study 2006-2008
    SWEET GRASS CREEK Water Supply and Storage Potential Study 2006-2008 Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation DNRC Report: WR 2.D.7a SGC Sweet Grass Creek Helena, Montana March 2010 Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 Project Area .............................................................................................................................. 1 Stream Flow Monitoring .......................................................................................................... 4 Water Supply ............................................................................................................................ 6 Potential Storage ...................................................................................................................... 9 Synoptic Flow Measurements ................................................................................................ 10 Discussion .............................................................................................................................. 13 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................ 14 Appendix A – Inflow/Outflow Hydrographs for 2006-2008 ................................................. 15 Appendix B – Daily Stream Flow Data for Sweet Grass Creek 2006-2008 .......................... 18 Appendix C – Potentially Storable Volume Graphs 2006-2008
    [Show full text]
  • Streamflow Characteristics of the Yellowstone River Basin, Montana, Through September 1982
    STREAMFLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF THE YELLOWSTONE RIVER BASIN, MONTANA, THROUGH SEPTEMBER 1982 By R. J. Omang U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 84-4063 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Helena, Montana May 1984 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WILLIAM P. CLARK, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief Open-File Services Section U.S. Geological Survey Western Distribution Branch 301 S. Park U.S. Geological Survey 428 Federal Building Box 25425, Federal Center Drawer 10076 Denver, CO 80225-0425 Helena, MT 59626-0076 Telephone: (303) 234-5888 CONTENTS Page Abstract ................................... 1 Introduction ................................. 1 Streamflow records .............................. 1 Station description ............................ 2 Period of record .............................. 3 Effects of regulation. ........................... 3 Tabulations of strearaflow characteristics. .................. 3 Monthly and annual mean discharge. ..................... 4 Flood frequency. .............................. 4 Low-flow frequency ............................. 4 High-flow frequency ............................ 5 Flow duration. ............................... 5 References cited ............................... 5 List of gaging stations, in downstream order ................. 6 Streamflow-gaging-station descriptions and statistical tables. ........ 8 ILLUSTRATION Figure
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks Fisheries Division Job
    MONTANA FISH, WILDLIFE AND PARKS FISHERIES DIVISION JOB PROGRESS REPORT State: MONTANA Element 1: FISHERIES MANAGEMENT Project No: F-113-R-3, 4, 5 Job No: 3520, 3530 Project STATEWIDE FISHERIES Job Title: MID-YELLOWSTONE Title: INVESTIGATION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATIONS MAJORITY FUNDED BY THE SPORT FISH RESTORATION PROGRAM. PROJECT PERIOD: JANUARY 1, 2003 THROUGH JANUARY 1, 2006 ABSTRACT A population estimate performed during spring 2003 in the Big Timber Section of the Yellowstone River showed few notable changes in the fish population, with the exception of the near absence of Yellowstone cutthroat trout (YCT). Survey shocking in several locations from Otter Creek to Laurel to determine the effects of the prolonged drought on trout populations, indicated large numbers of 8-12 in rainbows present in the river. Low fall water conditions precluded performing a population estimate in the Laurel Section. Electrofishing surveys performed in Esp Spring Creek yielded no cutthroat trout although other species of trout are using the creek for spawning. Juvenile rainbow and brown trout are present in the creek. A fish passage project was completed in 2004 to facilitate passage from the Yellowstone River into Esp Spring Creek during low water conditions. Little Timber Creek, Big Timber Creek and Sweet Grass Creek, Crazy Mountain tributaries to the Yellowstone River, were surveyed in 2003 and 2004. Native fish, including many non-salmonid species, dominate the fisheries of lower Sweet Grass and Little Timber creeks. Brook and brown trout are abundant in upper Sweet Grass Creek near Melville. Brook trout are very abundant (2444/mi) in Big Timber Creek near the U.S.
    [Show full text]