National Right to Work Committee 08WI Braddock Rd. 4Springfield.VA22160 6(800)325-7892 October 5, 1992

Dear Committee Member: Three strikes and you're out. Congressman wants to be 's next U.S. Senator. In the last few months, I have Bent Congressman Owens a letters pleading with him to tell his constituents where he stands on Right to Work. I've even tried certified mail And m,Congressman Owens outright refuses to answer his 1992 Candidate Survey; despite your postcards, calls, and letters urging him to answer. Clearly, Congressman Owens is trying to hide his views on compulsory unionism. And since presidential front-runner is vowing to sign Big Labor's entire political agenda into law, where Utah's Senators stand on Risht to Work is critical. Big Labor already has a veto-proof majority in t.he House of Representatives. And the U.S. Senate is teetering on the edge of falling totally under the control of union power brokers. If the union bosses ha-re their way, Taft-Hartley Section 14(b) will be repealed in the 103x3 Congress.

As you know, if 14(b) is repealed, Utah's popular state Right to Work law will be automatically wiped out! But there is some good news. Cocgressman Owens's opponent, , has vowed to represent the overwhelming majority of Utah citizens by promising 100% support for Right to Work. Would you please contact Mr. Owens and those running for the House of Representatives and tell them 75% of Utah citizens want them to support their Right to Work. This year, the union bosses are licking their chops in anticipation of controlling houses of Congress. They will stop at nothing to convince Congressman Owens to ignore his pro- Right to work constituents, and pressure Mr. Bennett into taking back his pledge. That's why it's absolutely vital that you contact the candidates and tell them to stand up for the people oE Utah, and not give in to union-boss pressure. Unless you turn the heat all the way up, Congressman Owens won't tell you where he stands on Right to Work. Congressman Owens is trying to stonewall Right to Work members, but his record in Congress speaks volumes. Representative Owens has been one of Big Labor's most reliable water carriers in Congress. Last June, he helped union- boss lobbyists ram 's Pushbutton Strike bill (H.R. 5/S. 55) through the House by a 247-182 vote. UI

4 As you know, if this bill passes, union bosses Will Call any strike they wish, and win any strike they call, easy as pushing a button -- bankrupting small businesses and throwing workers off their jobs. And Congressman Owens voted to allow Big Labor to dragoon 2.9 million federal employees, and countless private citizens into the union-boss political machine by voting to trash the 53-year-old Hatch Act. Congressman Owens constantly votes in lockstep with Big Labor demands, and unless Utah citizens overwhelm him with protests, he will continue to follow the same path as your U.S. Senator. On the other hand, Bob Bennett answered his survey in 100% support for Right to Work, and has pledged to fight Big Labor power grabs in the Senate.

,-1:./:.;, The future of the Riqht to Work may dependon where Utah's .... . Senators stand on cQmDulsQrv-unionism leuislation. i.j.. With several Risht to Work stalwarts like retirinq. Big Labor is pumping millions of dollars into 34 States -- includincr Utah -_ to buy a veto-proof majority in the Senate. Write, call and/or pay a personal visit to Congressman Owens -- as well as those running for the U.S. House of Representatives in your area -- before it's too late. Pre s Con ressman Ow n to re udiate his coz relationshi with &qSLaborq-- tell hi: :ou expgct him to defeid your Right'to Work, not the powers and privileges of Big Labor. He can only ignore your protests so long. If you and other Right to Work members scream loud enough. you will force Congressman Owens to choose between the public iriterest and the union-boss gaecial interest. Also thank Bob Bennett for his pro-Right to Work pledge. Because of his stand against forced unionism, the union political machine has targeted Mr. Bennett. He's under intense pressure to compromise his position. Encourage him to remain firm in supporting your Right to Work.

And I hope you'll do one mare thing. Please return the enclosed Survey '92 Action Reply. This will let me know you received your Survey '92 results, and have contacted the candidates about their answers. That way I'll know when I have to crank up the volume even more. I've had to stretch my budget to conduct our Survey '92 program. So if you can, please include a special contribution of $200, $100, $50 or $25 to help cover the costs of this effort. WQntact the candidates TODRY -- that's most important. Sincerely,

Reed Larson P.S. Congressman Wayne Owens has refused to renounce his votes for forced unionism. If Utah citizens pour on the Dressure. he miaht feel the heat and aee the liqht -- and SURDOKt Riqht to Work. Contact him today. I GR8 I. ST F CA B

Colorado eont. Utah cont. U.S. Senate Questions# 123456789 DMriat 6 :I c2mstfonsIY: 123456789 Tom Kolbe-D N--N-NYN- Questions#: 123456789 Ben Campbell-D ------(303) 850-9867 1303) 837-0565 Dan Schaefer-R ------Jane3 Hansen-R YYYYYYY-Y Terry Considine-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y (3031 989-2100 (801) 451-5218 (303) 757-2567 Ron Holt-D --y --____ (801) 544-0963 U.S. House of Representatives RlPhdat 2 Questions# 123456759 -D ------_-- U.S. Senate (801) 532-5241 ------Greene-R YYYYYYYYY ! Pat Schr:eder-D - Questions#: 1234 5 6789 Enid i LJb31 866-1230 Richard Stallings-D ------(801) 521-2808 %pond Diaz Aragon-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Dirk Kempthoene-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y ~ p03) 320-6607 District 3 ~ ;,a -D ------U.S. House of Representatives (8011 226-1112 Questions#: 1 2 3 4 5 6 75 9 Richard tlarrington-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y District 1 (801) 324-6102 Latty LaRocco-D ------Rachel Gilbert-R YYYYYYYYY

District 2 J.D. Williams-D ------Mlchael Crapo-R YYYYYYYYY

i Redder-D ------1 !=$03) 224-9767 U.S. Senate Wayne Allard-R YYYYYYYYY Questions# ~ (3031 226-2226 123456789 Wayne Owens-D ------(8011 524-4394 Charles Oriez-D ------Rcbetr. Bennett-R YYYYYYYYY (3031 798-3236 (801) 583-2635 Joel Hefley-R YYYYYYYYY (303) 933-0044

~~ Survey Questions

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the “services” 6. Will you support amendiilents to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidates opposed by union forces him to accept? members?

2. Will YOU suppon re@ of the provisions in f&djaws which 7. Will YOU oppose so-called “anti-double breasting” legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has, as ils primary goal. to forcibly unionize employees of consmction comoanieQ. ~-- 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley AcS which authorizes state Right to Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy fhe Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union political 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal anti-extortion stature? 9. Will you oppose legislation that would punish or require the firing of employees who choose IO work during a smke. and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, stale, giveunion officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees LO pay union dues? - Note: The National Right to Work Committee, of course, endorses no candidates. We arc a nonpanisan organization. Bu: we believe that you as a Right to Work supporter lm: eniillcd to know which candidates will support the right of every American to cam a living - without having 10 pay union bosses for the privilege. ._. Tie information below b helpful in explaining the questions on the reverse side of this form.

A union, under present federal laws, is empowered to Reorganization Act of 1970 and executive orders dating back to represent and bind all employees in a company’s bargaining the administration of President John F. Kennedy. unit - including employees who oppose the union and don’t 6. Labor unions are the only private organization the want its “services.” in US. which can legally force individuals to pay dies into their This monopoly bargaining power. generally described as treasuries. “exclusive bargaining rights,” deprives employees of heir right The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) prohibits onion to bargain for themselves. Union officials fought for this power officials from giving any of these dues dollars direclly to a and refuse to give it up; yet they complain they are “unfairly candidate for federal office. burdened by the legal obligation” to represent nonmembers. At the same time, FECA permits union officials to use Such complaints are intended to pave the way for compelling workers’ compulsory dues dollars for “in-kind” political fmancial suppon from dled“free riders” for representation spending on goods and services to elect candidates fox federal they do not want. offices. The f~ngof workers who refuse to pay union dues and/or These “in-kind expenditures are in addition to union PAC fees is explicitly sanctioned by both the National Labor contributions; they are seldom - if ever - documented or Relarims Act and the National Railway Labor Act. reported to the Federal Electicr. Commission. Section 7 of the NLRA. for example. stipulates that No official statistics for total union “in-kind” expenditures employees shall have “the right to refrain” from participating in are available. But Labor columnist Victor Riesel estimated that union activities “except to the extent that such right may be this so-called “soft money” amounted to 10 times more than affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor what union PACs gave in cash conuibutions. Based on that organization as a condition of employment.” yardstick, union “soft money” in 1990 exceeded $350 million. The problem of compulsory unionism was created by 7. In recent years. legislation has been introduced in Congress Congress. It will not be solved until Congress repeals the to automatically impose union representation upon workers of existing federal authorizations of compulsory unionism. nonunionized companies which have even the slightest In 21 states, wage earners - except those covered by the economic links to unionized companies. National Railway Labor Act - lare shielded from compulsory Even though the nonunionized and the unionized companies unionism by Right to Work laws. each perform separate and distinct work, the compulsory union The guarantee is typical of these laws, saying, ‘The conuact would be automatically imposed upon the nonmion right of persons to work shall not be denied or abridged on workers, without even the show of an election conducted by the account of membership or nonmembership in any labor union or Natiopal Labor Relations Board to determine worker support. labor organization.” The “anti-double breasting” legislation would also encounge The authority of states to adopt and enforce such laws is Common Situs picketing by permitting union organizers to use dfmed by Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley amendmenv; to a dispute with a single subcontractor as an excuse to picket wd the National Labor Relations Act. shut down all thc other subcontractors at a job site. Extortion. as a technique. is extremely useful to union 8. Legislation has been introduced repeatedly in Congress 1~ officials in obtaining such demands as conipulsory union shops, loosen the SO-year-old Hatch Act’s restrictions against panisan “agency” shops, compulsory hiring halls and irrevocable dues political activity by federal employees. check-off clauses. Federal union officials now wield monopoly bargaining While most criminal law is administered at the state and local power over federal employees, which makes union officials the level. some criminal activities (including extortion). which sole conduit for civil servants in collective bargaining and obstruct interstate commerce, have been deemed by Congress to grievance situations. be so imponant that they should be covered by federal statutes. Current proposals to weaken the Hatch Act lack explicit As the federal law currently stands, union officials have prohibitions against the use of monopoly bargaining power 10 unique special immunities from prosecution for threatening LO coerce civil servants into supporting federal union officials’ commit or committing felonies - such as murder. polifical agenda. manslaughter. maiming, arson. aggravated properly destruction, 9. Legislation has been introduced in Congress that would explosives or firearms offenses, etc. - IO obtain collective bargaining demands. prevent employers from hirrng permanent replacement workers during a strike. For the past several years. Congress has been confronted by The bill’s provisions would also penalize workers who bills designed to authorize the forced unionization of public choose not to strike by giving preferential. post-strike hiring employees at various levels of government. privileges to strikers. Several of these proposals are aimed at state, county and Since an employer is unlikely to find employees who will municipal employees and would nullify existing state laws work during a violent strike under these conditions, employers which shield public employees from union coercion. would be forced to cave in to every demand by union officials Other bills would strip postal workers and other federal - including the demand that workers who refuse to pay union employees of the freedom of choice guaranteed by the Poswl dues be tired. 1992 SURVEY QUESTIQN§ 1. Will you oppose all effons '9 repal or weaken Utah's Right lo Work law? 2. Will you oppose legislation in Ulah designed lo grml "exclusive bargaining" powers lo public sector unions? 3. WrII you oppose legislation designed IO grant "agency siiop" privileges to public or private sector union officials? CANDIDATES FOR GOVERNOR

Ltl P2 #3 Ul Y2 63 #I (I2 113 hicnill Coak - IP Y Y Y RiaGum-P ... Cmy R. Van Worn - A YYY

Linda Meugcr-Agin .I . - . StswulHnnron-D .-_Frmk W. Risllins ~ 1A N Y Y Mike Lcavill. R - . . EisMorGar&-SW ...

CANDIDATES FOR LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR

a1 PZ P3 #I t44 #3 #I n2 113 Cenc Mcuger.Agin. I ... Paul. JUlandn~D .-.,411~ Hcu Psderren - A YYY Wxlliun Ah- SW ... hlncer Hntch Menill. I . - - OIsm Walkcr- R ..~

CANDIDATES FOR STATE SENATE

PI 11 #3 #I XZ #3 (I1 I283 JLMLku ... Fred FinliNon R* ...... ' .. - Lmy Glnke . R YYY Smti Howell .D* NYY NNY CIaymn "Winmi' Bullrr . L YYY I1Lrtrlfll4 alafrlrl_?d RhukL.3 Craig Pctcrran . R* YYY Lyle Hillymd - R' YYY Blaze Whanon - D 11. K. PM5. D LIwd Wmhcrslon .P NYY Slevcnr "Woody" Pedcnon .R YYY Monte Williamson - D YBB IiawSLu lmLkL4 Charles SICWM. R ... IlMchxl Suvcn KCI~EI. D ... Ode Smngllam - D ... Oavid Adm- R ... Howard Slephcnron - R YYY Mike Dmiuirh - Do ".. ahtLwJl luslKks Eldon Money. Do ... llMKkLu Brent Richards - R YYY Cay Peterson. P' YYY Sid WUle. D NNY Wllimn- D QMLkua m Robert F. Montgomery .,R ... David Watson .R YYY Stephen Rcer .R' ... David Nuffa - D ... hiuy Ilnmmond - D ... QiaukLu Thorns Nelson. I ... Glade Niclren -Re YYY Joseph Hull. D ... CANDIDATES FOR STATE ROUSE OF REPRESENTATIVIES

nl u2 83 dl112 w3 #I 112 113 UuLul lmulwJ3 fmcr Ringham - R YYY Cynlhia knren .R * - - NonS~cphnu-R YYY Eli Anderson. D ... Grant holmM. D' ... CaleVoiihl .D' ... Belh Ienrcn - I QhlLLu2 w . R* YYY Jarcph Murray - R YYY CencThoinpron .D NNN Hayncr Fullcr - D' ... Don Bush - R YYY Richard Putridge. L YYY Urnon Borgeson - D* QuLlSu? Lnrm Livingston. L NYY PLSldrll Dlniel Enrly - R ... Stcphcn Bodily - R* YYY lahn Aninglon .D* ... lthLkta Clinl Fumer - D ... Blake Chvd - R YYY alrtrlct_lp 0.Sibbp Smith. D ... QLuIu3 Douglu Holmcr .R YVV... Fred Hunrakker .R* YYY Patricia Luran .D* ... n!strrzll6 Kevin Gun - R* YYY w JuLCku. Donald Hillman. D ... Evan Olrcn - R. YYY Dougl- Pcrcrran - R Y Y Y Paaiciallunr -L YYY Dcll Johnson - D ... Byron Anderson. D* ... QhukLu ruutLlA Muda Dilrse - R YYY hianin Stephens .8' YYY 0- Adair. R Y Y Y PanicinHcners-D ... C.W. "Cy" Frciton .D ... -V. DeMont Wibcrg .D* Y Y Y JoeJudd-L YYB Allon timothy. I suy Vandalza - P YYY XI I( II ((2 a3 #l n2 ti3 DLslrle1116 ... Phil Ubi. R* YYY Lowcll Nclron. R YYY . . - SwnnWay-D ... Chrirline Robinson - D YYY DLalllLL31 Raymond Short. R YYY YYY Y Y Y B.I. Vuuooacndoll-D ... . . - GlmD~~vir-I ... lllaKMa Doyle Mortimrr . R DlalrlclJB Rick Slorcy - D YYY Chulcr Pipkin .R ... Arlo lmer .DO ... luULm& Norman Nicken. R. YYY QlaLkla Michcel Weddoups. R* YYY l.u.wuB b%%i?n. R' YYY lomc PI- - D ... R. Lce Ellcrlson - R' YYY luna Gowrm - D ... Rodney Rogcrson - D IJlukuu 1. Reme Hunm - R* YYY IllrJrlrtda Nomm Fiunerald. Ir.. R YYY A. Pmicia Spiegcl .D ... Icll Alermdn .R YYY ...... LkuSul Dlrtrlrt.0 DWid Ode,. R* YYY JordmTmcr .R* YYY Sun &bank. D YYY QhlLku4 Puo Sua- D ... ulJiCu2 Byron Harward - R' David Brunahan - R YYY Beryl Fumr - L YYY RL¶ILuA Pad Shepherd. D ... FrdPignlnclli .D* ... Ktthi Smith - L ... BlsLrLrt61 RassU Schmil - IA YYY lirnolhy Schow - I ... 1. Brent Hayrnond. R* YYY ClanBird - D YBB RhwsL2s RMLkul Robert Huucn .R YYY Kelly Atinran. D* Lususu6 David loner. D ... Ern Maran. D* E. 0."WWoods. P ... Dlatrlcl?L4 Rob Wddrop. L Rokt Killpack - R LusucU2 Bob Jmer Camslock - 1 ... Gmrgc Monkan. D Bill Wright . R' YYY Loren HrnmcL .A YYY Lxsukus Melvin Brown - R* ... Leonard Blackhem. R YRR - ...... Kmcth Bvdge .D NNN Bovd Rrathcrrcn . D YYY RYY JmukU.6 Irby Anington .R YYY iuukLf& ... Kmy LeLhmm .D Mackse Potter .R .. YYY Tom Msidiewi - D .. DhILuA! RuLkus Norman Riggs .R YYY llhukcu Afton Bmdshaw - R. YYY Dmcll lorgenien .D* Bradley Johnson. R YYY Ken Buchi .D ... Jamcs Porter - 0 Ron krhy .L BYY lawAL4u Dm Simons. R YYY ILhlIMA Kwt Orcuion .D. lylc Anderson - R YYY YYY DmNakni-D BNN ... 6lbwSLu YYY Russell Cannon. R ... .-. Mike Chabricr .D ... %k%k?Bowrnm - R YYY Chris Eskclson. L NNN lil&L&u ... Qbuklm James Yardlev. R. YYY SIevO W.lton. L NYY Cluk Rekr .R YNY YYY Will Marshall - L ... €uukLu Richud Evm - R Y Y Y Shirley lensen. R YYY Muy Cuhn- D ... RcnetChristcnien- D . - . MetJohnson-R YYY Chidm Pcvcc .L YYY Betty Chrirtcnscn - I ... DMrJsuz LlhubJs R. Mom Eva. R . - - John Hichm -R ... L!ucklA Mulin Spmncer .D ... Dixie Andru~. D ... Clifford Hc(n .8 ... Ki1tyBurlon.L YYY AIIm Rurhmn .DO ... Jmet Ericlan .A ... Dlrzrlrlu. David Un .R ... LuILuu Cluk Newhall. D ... Gaylc hhwcm- R N Y Y Peter Budnick-L YYY - Refused 10 Rerplnd Ned Hcndrickron .D* ... . WE5 "01 Surveyd ICKY &KO". L NYY Dcnoicr an Incumbent BCVCI~YEvms .R YYY cmklslA A Arncrirm 0.0.Cmrhan .R YYY D lkrnnnat httrry Cutlet .D - . . DmRice-R YYY I Indcpndcnt CMdidrlc Rnymord Mummy. D YYY IA lndc~nrlcnlAmerican llkc&Lu IP lndpndcnt Party Mark Whiuacr - R ... L Libertarian hdy AM Bunmb .D ... Chrirune Fox .R -.. -&ma Lee Eirenhut. D ...

NOIE: The Nalional Right lo Wmk Committee. of come, endorses no candidaim. We nre n nonpartisan arganimtion. But we believe mal you. 89 a Right to Wok Suppo~,arc cnlilled lo know which cmdidaas wiil support the right of- American to get or keep a job - without having io pay union bows for thc privilege. TO : Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Conunittee $001 Braddock Road Springfield;’VA 22160

FROM. : 2,

. . ..

- $200 $100 - $50 - $25- Othr Please make checks payable and return to: MRTWC

...... P ...... , ~ :-.i ..

... .- . __ ...... _...... -- ,., : . :.,.:,,. ' .. .: ... . ~. . ,,.,...&.:I ,~ ...... _....-. ;...A ......

...... 1.2 -

The National Ripht to Work Committee's Washineton- D.C Hdmarlw is loated at our nation's -Pi-the tal at 8a)l Braddock Road. Suite 500 * S-,L.--k$l-l(W)V @.el 3257892. Because IRS has mizedpJKlWC .a tax exempt under IRCSer Ml(c)(4). which rmmitsunlimited lobbving, mbutionsare not tax deductible a3 charitable contributiong.

. Dedr Conunittee Member: Three strikes and you're out. Governor and John Rauh both want to be 's next U.S. Senator. In the last few months, I have sent Governor Gregg and Mr. Rauh L2x.ee letters pleading with them to tell constituents whether they will vote against legislation to force New Hampshire workers to pay union dues. And still, Governor Gregg and Mr. Rauh outright refuse to answer their 1992 Candidate Surveys in support of Right to Work. Clearly, neither politician will take a stand against compulsory unionism. And since presidential front-runner Bill Clinton is vowing to sign Big Labor's entire political agenda into law, where NW -Hammhire's Senators stand on Rioht t o Work is critical. Big Labor already has a veto-proof majority in the House of Representatives. And the U.S. Senate is teetering on the edge of falling totally under the control of union power brokers. If the union bosses have their way, Taft-Hartley Section 14(b) will be repealed in the 103rd Congress. As you know, if 14(b) is repealed, all state Right to Work laws will be automatically wiped out! But there is some good news. Independent candidate Larry Brady has vowed to represent the overwhelming majority or' New Hampshire citizens by promising 100% support for Right to Work. Mr. Brady is a proven fighter for the Right to work cause, and has vowed to take a leadership role in advancing Right to Work if New Hampshire citizens send him to Washington. Please contact Governor Gregg and Mr. Rauh and those running for the House of Representatives and tell then 75% of New Hampshire citizens want them to support their Right to Work. This year, the union bosses are licking their chops in anticipation of controlling houses of Congress. They will stop at nothing to convince Governor Gregg and Mr. Rauh to ignore their pro-Right to Work constituents, and pressure Mr. Brady into taking back his pledge. Unless you turn the heat all the wdy up, neither Mr. Gregg nor Mr. Rauh will take a stand in favor of Right to Work. Ask Governor Gregg why he killed a New Hampshire Right to work bill the first chance he got. Last February, doing the bidding of AFL-CIO bosses. Governor Gregg pulled strings and twisted arms behind the scenes to pressure previous Right to Work supporters in the State House to vote with Big Labor against Rep. Gary Daniels' Right to Work bill LH.8. 1432). Under coercion by Governor Gregg, several. Republican tnembers of the State House abandoned their previous support for worker freedom and crushed the bill by a vote Of 211-134. ii ti

And his refusal to answer his survey makes me think that his pledge to veto a New Hampshire Right to Work bill was more than just an isolated incident. The Democratic candidate, John Rauh, is the darling of the state AFL-CIO, and has been endorsed by union bosses all over New Hampshire. Mr. Rauh seems to be following in the footsteps of his father, who was an arch foe of worker freedom, and actually dragged the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation to court in an attempt to steal the names of the Foundation members. On the other hand, Independent candidate Larry Brady answered his survey in 100% support for Right to Work, and has pledged to fight Big Labor power grabs in the Senate. The future of the Riqht to WoIk may deoend on where New HamDshire's Senators stand on ComDulsory-unionism leqislation.

Write, call and/or pay a personal visit to Governor Gregg and Mr. Rauh -- as well as those running for the U.S. House of Representatives in your area -- before it's too late. 2. relations hi^ with Biq Labor -- tell them you expect them to defend your Right to Work, not the powers and privileges of Big Labor.

They can only ignore your protests 30 long. If you and other Right to Work members scream loud enough, you will force Governor Gregg and Mr. Rauh to choose between the p&J& interest and the union-boss soecial interest. Also thank Larry Brady for his pro-Right to Work pla8ge. Because of his stand against forced unionism, the union political machine has targeted Mr. Brady. He's under intense pressure to compromise his position. Encourage him to remain firm in supporting your Right to Work. And I hope you'll do one more thing. Please return the enclosed Survey '92 Action Reply, so I'll know you received your Survey '92 results, and have contacted the candidates about their answers.

I've had to stretch my budget to conduct our Survey '92 program. So if you can, please include a special contribution of $200, $100, $50 or $25 to help cover the costs of this effort. antact the candidates TODAY. It's crit ical. 1~ 1992 SURVEY ~UE~~I~~~ I 1. Wfl you support enactment of a state Right to Work law by the New Hampshire Legislature? I 2. Wa you support the repeal of monopoly bargaining privileges union officials currently have over public employees? I 3. Wiu you oppose so-called "agency shop" legislation in the public sector?

#1#2 #3 #I #2 #3 N B B MiriamLuce-L YYY IDATES FOR STATE SENATE

-. . ,. ,i #1#2 $3 #1#2 #3 #1#2 a3 :& p&&l.JQ District 18 Cmla Lamirm.de - D -_- Clesson Rlaisdell . D* John King - D* _-. plcderick King ~ R NNY Jane Lane - R John Follansbee - L YYY

Lawrence Constantine ~ R ___ District I? .. __.Gerald Shennan - D ~.~

YYY Alan Gmupc ~ L YYY Richard Rwman - R* David Wheeler - R YYY ___ District 12 _.. NNN Barbara Baldizar - D ___ YYY Thomas Stawasz - R YYB District 4 District 21 John Lake - D YNN District 11 - DL _-_ David ParLer - L YYY Debora Pignatelli - D N B N Amos Tournsend - R YYY LeoFm-RO ___ Donald Davidson - R YYY District 27 Disnict.S rkaiaI4 Bob Slein - L YYY

heRow - D Thomas Colantuono ~ R' Joseoh Delxhuntv - Re Ralph Hough - R* Pete'Murphy - D. ._. Lliaiau District 6 Carol Carstarphen - D -__District 23 Charles Grnrsic - D ___ Paul Siegler - L YYY Beverlv Hollineworth - DC _--

George Lovejoy ~ R YYY Susan Mche- R' NNN District 7 District 1Q District 24 Dnvid Plourdc - I) - - ~ RonaldMachos-D .-_Burt Cohen - De __. Ma& Bendcr - L ___ Scott Ives - L - - . W.DouglasScamman. Jr. - R N N Y David Curia ~ R* N N N EleanorPodles- R* YBB Pistrict 8 District 17 George Dunmd - D' N N B PaulBruwn-L YYY John S. Banes - R YYY District 9 Richard Frank - D Sheila Roberge - Re

#I #2 13 Don Frost - D ...

Soseph Elcock ID - D N N N AlbertCarista- L- William..~~ Winter~~.~ ~ - L~. YYY Cul'Johnson - R* Y Y Y CharlesHampe-L YYY David Lawton - R Y Y Y JaneMmay-D --.w Justin Paschal - D SuzmeWoy-D ... Robert L. Hyman - L YYY Thomas Cain - R' ... Gregory Lindland - L ..- w Robert Hswkins - R' ... Burton Knight I1 - D ..- Francine Wendelbe. R -.. Alice Ziegra - R' YYY RobLallam - R _..w Paul Golden - R* YBB William Joscelyn - D* .-_Richard Campbell - R' Y Y Y Linda AnnSmih-R YYY Thornas Salatiello . D* ... Wdliam Hawk - R Y Y Y P3uI J.King -D ... 11 #2 #3 #l #2 #3 E.&& GhWl CQQd Cordon Bdeu- R Robcn Delano ~ R YY Joseuhine Mayhew - D* -__ o.. ,.. i i'. , HeathaQlrirm-D ' N .N 'N' :AdriarncPAuchaL-D ;. Kim c. smith - L YYY--_ cQ€!d w Lynn Horton - R' RobNewmmb - L C;mn Dewhirst - R* Y Y Y irrneRott-D= CQQd Robm Holbrook - R* highton Ran - R*

Thomas Rice. Jr. ~ R* Ralph Rosen - R* !&A Roben ber~ R* Harold Burns - R* __-

Niel Young ~ R Dallas Gilbert - D - iemeth Cole - I* Kaxa Mare- D Richaxd Defosses - D ches'l Dons MaLely - D Wliam Riley - D' Angie Argiropolis - D Bob Byme -b Phil Davis - D GkS4

Stephen Avq ~ R YYY

Dean ShanLlc. Jr. ~ R -__ Dw Bumham - D* -__

Doris Haddock ~ D NNN BNCCMcCuUey - I ... ___ EdMears-D YYY GhE2 31a HOIWCU- D H. Charles Royce - R Jams Wiswell - D _. Joseph Manning - R Anthony R. Harp - L YYY Hu@ J. Landis - L i'i ad.!? i Edmund S. Foley - L YYY John Hunt - R* YYY Donald Philbrick - R YNY -.... ChELu Richard Hill - I* Swey Cole - R* YYY Stephanie Eaton - R YBY David Perry - R* YBB Kathleen Wind - R* --- Carol Jcffery - D YYY ... vlrgil Mullins ~ D ... m ... RichordTrelfa ~ R* __- Ches_l? Dorothy Blodgett - D YYY

Donald Crutchlev ~ P.' YYY Wi~iamP. Pea& - L --- w Barbara Richanison - D Deborah Mcnwaine - Do __- s$nz Charles Lacomb - I, ... Mildred Besch - R* GtlsLi David Skclley ~ L William J. Pearsail - L YYY w Elaine Miller - 5 Kaiherine Menger - Rb Wmen Priest ~ D NNN

Bonnie Ham ~ R YYY w mal4 Jeb Bradlev ~ R* YBB lim Depecol - Do M Relf G. Fogg - L YYY Paul Lamotr. R* DouglassTeschner - R* Ronald Russell - D Allenw Wiggin - R* Frederick Mohr. Jr. - R' __- !adL!J chcslfl YYY Robert Foster - R" David Pierce - R -__ YYY

Howad Sanders ~ R* H. 7'haycr Kingsbury - D' YYY Sid Lnvett - D ...

William McCvthy ~ D Noma Schrader - D Michael LaPierre - D YYY David Dow - R* __- Chd GeAdePearson .R" Wil!iam Driscoll - R" YYY Stephen J. Varone - L YYY James HOK.SII- R* -._€bd3 G3.a Rob~Mkuirk - D ... Emily Evans - R Nils Larson. Jr. ~ R* YBY 'limoty Robertson - D Edward Cordon - R __.

Anne Smih ~ D NNN

David W. Wilbur ~ L _._ckLl9 Pwdra Jones - D __- Marshall Gordon -D ___ David Avery - R YYY Sarah BOM~U- D ._-Robert Hardy - R YBY Q@ John hurent ~ R* YYY Candy Pierce - R _-- Jeff Emery - L YYY David Young .R' ... Richard Champagne - D' NNN Alson Brown - R YYY Norman Bellerive - L ... Margaret Lynch - D* NNN Kaherine Foster. D* YYY David J. Zebuhr - L NYY Alex Mooney - R Wanda McNamara - R YYY Fred Cadeton - R YYY GmLl Lmdc McNamara - R NNN

Pat Menill - R' YYY Marion Copenhavc; ~ D* ... Frederic Foss .R YYY Elizabeth Crory - D ... I #1#2 rt3 #1 #2 63 ' Robert Guest - De 1 Sharon Nordgrm - D* -_- ham-R YBY . . Y Y Y GeorgeWright-R Y Y Y: Gail Rvctor - D ... YY Y tii1122 YY.~ uniu.3 Stanlev Searles. SI. - R YYY Patricia ~aryBmwn ..D ..* Scott R. Bowden - L Y B B Shawnlaswr-R i Charles Gibson - L __-Joan Tate R 1w Charles Ferguson - R* YYY G. Philip Rodgers - R 1 William Row - R - GaryDaniels-R* YYY Alida Weergmg - R

Keith Monmef ~ R Willard Young - R Gwu3 Stltan Wing - R YYY William Arseneault - D 1 Richvd Lougec - R* .. - Annekwis-D ___ Kevin Riley - D NNiu' l Clifton Below - D .. kronica Sherman ~ D Gwrge Baker. Sr. .DO __.

Jma DeWirt ~ D Amy Bagley - D iiilu! 1 Eliot Page ~ D N Thomas Kirby - D i Pamela Bean ~ Re Michael Marcinkowski - D

I Channine Brown - R* - Sonny Johnson - D -_- Nina Camn ~ D

--~ Andrew J. Borsa - Garret Cowenhoven R* YYY - L - Carol Holden - R* -_- James Fenton - R Elizabeth Lawn - R* YYY Richard Hagan - R Tom Stama - D ... 0.0 --~ Chris Johnson - D fm22 YY V Leonard Smith - R _-_ -Iwlls Amy Bollenbach - L YYY Dana Kelley - R* NNN Dorothy Bdwers . R* YYY Hiu.26 YY Y Burke - R YYY Arthur W.Ketchen - L Barbara Upcon - R -__SUZ~ Frankr - R David Wuslow - L NYN Mark Holt R

YY Y George R. McGee - L YYY Veronica Marquis ~ R

YY Y Christopher I. Kelleher ~ L YYY David Diamond - D ~. Thomas Kane .D ___ Philip Ackerman - D" -- JohnVmUden-D YYY George Todgham - D .. .Roland Sallada - R* YY Y KulBerJrdi-D i.-:Tmothy Wmman - D -- u .j : HiU.6 Stefan Silverston - D m Pew Wells. SI. - R Mary Jane Thorp - D Ruth Ayer - D NNN Sandie hard- D Richard Butler ~ D NNY mLl2 Alice Record - R* Paul Perkins - R YYY Leon Calaws 11. - R YYY Stanley Vandealosk - R* NeA Kurk - R YYY Loren Jean - R YYY Robert Mercer - RY Marc D. Luther - L YYY mu Mary Boucha - D ... ltIlua8 Elizabeth Moore - R* Sylvia Holley - R Roger Hall - D HilLl.8 Anhur Ferlan - R*

Fmlay C. Rothhaus - L' -__Byron Buckingham ~ R Frederick Ahrens - R YYY Norman Bergeron - D ___ haDodge - R YYY Robert Daigle - D* NNN Dennis Fields - R -__ LauraKane-D -.-Gary Greenberg - R -__

B~ceHunter - R YYY Robert L'Heureux ~ R .__mL29 Kxcn McRac - R* YYY Robert Kcllcy - R YNB David Cow - D* Frederick Branch - R YYY Robert Miliigm - R .._Alphonse Haettenschwiller . -_. Daniel McNerney - R' Derek Thibcault - D YYY John Smart ~ D Barbara Grirtin - D ... Randy Shepherd - D ___ Steve Kuchinski - R' __. Maggie Dolbow - D ... Michael Bannan - D ... Tom Alciere - L NYY

Joann D'Avanza - D ... Carolyn Disco ~ D ... Greta Mom - D .." Hilw m Ilene Themen - D ... Donnalee Lozeau - R* Merm Dyer - Re Christine White - D .." Stephen Drake - D ... Stanley Pitas - R* John Gibson - D ... Paula Philbrook ~ D _.. Edward Hmblin - D John Hostage - D ..- Jmes Shea - D u Bonnie Packard - R Hi1131 "-9 Jane Clemons - D ... Eleanor Amidon - Re YYY Richard Saucy - D NNN Phillip Germain - D ... Thomas Arnold. Jr. . R YBB Roland Lefebvre - D* YNN ... Barbara Burckes - R Alan Thornaier ~ R YYY l&DJl Betty Hall - D* NNN Janet Hart - L ... Kathleen Giacoponello -R .. . . Glenn Formica - D -.. Paul McCoy - L ...

Linda Foster ~ D ... HiUl mL22

Mary are. R YYY Paul hon~ R Hal Melcher D ... - Greg Hanselman - D' ... Clacdette Jean ~ D "N Howvd Man. Re YYY Lucien Bergeron ~ D Roland Morrissetre - D "N #I #2 # #1#2 #3 Hillxi "i Skdun B& - D* - . - - RavmondBucklev-D* . Roirrt Dawc Sr. - D Dike neming - D .Y N Y HaroidRichardson-D 3 '; Snge lensen - D Richard DuBois. D - - - Beuyhewny-D --- Bonnie McCann - RE Frances Riley - R* Y Y Y BradDo~~ey-L YYY EkkthCepritis - R Werie Cook - Re Y Y Y StewartNelson Jr.. L YYY George Elides - R Jarquelyn Domainsue - R* Y Y Y PnbiciaA.Monahan-L YYY Danielle Donovan - L Y Y Y SusanCma-R _.. Hilu! Jeannine Bernier - L Y Y Y C.Wi1liamlohnson- R' YYY Frederick Mews- Re Christopher P. Agan - L Y Y Y RichnrdKennedy-R -..

Francis Donovan ~ De MqEllen Martin - D* Hiu5 w Jean Misiwin - D Janet Bany - R YBB Jovce Johnson - D* .-.

William Desrosiers. Jr. ~ R* NNN &des Chandler - L ... llill25 EliichzimmCrrm~-L YYY Richard Chssse - De Gerald Gosselm - D* NNN MGlI.9 Antlrrmy Karm - D Michael R. Capone - L w Glen G~ais~ D Raymond Cummings - D Theresa Drabinowicz - D* LauraHildIeth-D IIill44 James Gcke - D John White - D' Samuel Langley - D N' N N Frank Reidy - D* Jnck Willis - R YYY

Neil Folev ~ D Richard Barberin R' YYY ~.. Irene Meisier - R' Robert Lockwood ~ R' Howard DLUXIS- R Henry Stapleton - R YYY Chrislinc McMahon - R NNN

YYY Douglas Hall ~ Re

Gacton MOM- L YYY Marlyn Flanders ~ R

Carl Ceruso ~ R YYY Barbara Parker ~ D Bernard Ganity - R Y. Y Y Charles Yeaton - D' JeanCote - D Douglas Could Jr. - R 'Z.. Haold Amirdt - D Rodolphe Paquette - D* m ,..' Michael Morello ~ R Roland Turgenn - D* Sarah Cmway - D YNY

' Wmmn MECarty - R Robert Asselin - D Lowell Ayr;.!~~ R* YYY ..i"i.- Deborah beau-Fleming - R Ray Lange: - R YY' Terry Pfdf I R NNN 'xilm Estelle Dion - D Hmld Worthen, Jr. - R Y Y Y SocratesMakris-D Nancy Beasley - R Y Y Y RuthMachas-D Monte Rehlander - R Dorothv Worthen - R Y Y Y LillianRheault- R' Randall Shaw - R ___ Eugene Gagnon - R' Gabriel Daneault - D' ___ Bob Chabot - R George Letoumeau - 0" NNN Maurice Regan - D w Jay Ward - D w John Chandler - R* YYY Lionel Johnson~ - D* Earle Chandler ~ R' YYY Cornelius Keane - D* Howard L Wilson - L YYY =Tracy - D --. MadeIyn Ahlgren - D Lucinnna Nakiel - D -__Cam1 Spada - D YYN

Leo Pcpino - R* Daniel Narkiel ~ D Martin Feuerstein ~ R* YBY Sean McLaughIin - R ___ Robert Gilbreth - R' Ks~hleenSou - R YBY MCrL.2 James Whittemore - R.

Denis Bovin ~ L ... Avis Nichols - R' Thomas Houlahnn - R m?LE ...... uilul William Kidder - R' Mary Holmes - R* .. Bernard lucbkm - R Sheq Could - D Lany Dugan - D "_ Ronald Charpentier - R Thomas StotIer - D Lawrence Johnson - R Michael Munroe - D Daniel Healy - D* Mau Ncwland - D

Roger LaRochelle ~ D* MsXL3

Francis Laughlin ~ D* Thea Braiteman - D* NBB f&gJ.@ Barbara French - D N B B William H.Main - L Y 'i Y mlA2 Bernie hach- R Y B Y AnneCoughlin-D -.. Beniamin Bardv D' Mike Hill R* ... , ~~ - - Donna Soucy ~ D; w Roben Murphy ~ D* .__Rick Trombly .D* --- John G. Elsnau - L YYY Lany J. Bud - L Y Y Y Paul Fillion - R* ._.

Lana Dykstra ~ R ... Mark Hopkins - D ... Danielle Rogin - R NNN kkII-5 Carry Rogier - R NNN Chris Brock .L YYY Daniel Courcherne - D ... Steven Levy - L .-- HU Michael Whalley .R Y B Y CarolineGross - R* ... Norma Champagne ~ R YNY Patricia Coley - R YYY MsILl!? Edward Cmttv - D* NNN Mary AM Lewis - R* Y Y Y J. Allen Bennett - R Patricia D,& - D* ... Derek Owen - D ... Daniel C. Proctor - I.

Charles LeClerc ~ D* -.. Michael R. McMylus - L Y Y Y C~olMoore-D #1#2 #3

Pahicia Dowling - R KalhrynAranda-R HaktDrake - R* YYY

Phillip hsa- R Janet Corny ~ R YYY

Jennifer Soldati - D* SdDowd ~ R Bob Fesh .R Rock 25 ~kz2 George Katsakiores - R Georpe Rubin - R* YYY i Katherine Ronm - D RebaLee - R Debo& Woods - R' _-.

~ John Waltenr R Maurice MacDondd - R Louis Gargiulo - R YYY Don Milln - R Silvia Chaplain - D _-- !m Rober~Pullman - R Jean Gregg-Lincoln - D _-- 1 Mariorie Buessine - R YYY i J. V&licox Brown"- D _-_&cJ& Ndieflanagan - R YYY David 1. Bwson - L IMcKL24 Keith Gaignea~li- L _-_ Douglas G. Harrigan - L 1 MichaelClntin-D Barbara Garofalo - D

1 MiriamIXrrm-D* ik?&l2 Stephanie Micklon ~ D I Marv Jane Wallner - Da Wlliam R. Discipio - L YYY Samuel Gigliotti - D _-_Wvian Clark - R YYY Dan Breton - D YYY Ed Pumm n - R ___ Doris Raherty - D John Oliver - D ... Carlos Figuema - D Joseph Herdade - D 'Q& w Marcia Leighninger - D 1 Robcn Johnson - R* L . .. - - .. , Leroy Duke - R Jeanne Macaskill - D Merilyn Senter - R Marilyn Campbell - R* Beverly Gage - R* ___ &d&! FrediGuse-R ... Peter Simon - R YYY - R* Mw L. Par&-Bonser - I ... C. William Johnson - R --- Bernard Raynowska ~ R' ..~ ... Stephen Buco - 8. ___ E~MB Donna Sytek - R* YYY %% Williamson - R YYY John Flanders - R NNN Richard Noyes ~ R ___

Deborah Marvit - D ___ David Welch ~ R YYY Wur Smith - R* YYY

Kenneth Wevln ~ R YNB Donald Roulston - L* ... &cJ& Marjorie Bakes - R 36hn Hoar. Jr. - R Bprkzz

Rick Newman ~ D NNN Patricia Skinner - R*

Roben A. Bonsn - I ... Lois Beaulieu ~ R Carol Yennaso - R John ViWe - L ... W~lfredBeaulieu - R Margaret Halon - D _-_ Albert Caswell - Do Janet S. hdt- R ...

M Betsy cw ~ D C. Donald Shitch - R Joseph Schanda, Sr. -DE Rock2 Harold Flaherty - D Anhur Klemm - R* Tom St. Martin - D Kenneth A. Bodwell - L James Rosencrantz - D* Bprkze Stephen Therrien - D William Boucher - R' YYY Joseph Stone - R YYY Sandra Fowler-Mitchell - D Beby McKinney - R* YYY John Hemey - D - R* __. lk!d Jack Heath - D Daniel Blake - R .. - . Harriet Cndy - R YYY Sherman Chester - R Robert Hazelton - R YYY Donald Gonnw - D ... Thaddeus Klemarczyk - RC Manin Bove - R YBY

Harold Magcon - R* Karen Hutchinson ~ R* NNN Rock2 Carmela Dipietro - R* Edward Bwggemann - D NNN

Patricia Cote - R David Flanders ~ R' Michael Foley - D _--

William Crum. JP. - R YYY Patricia Kelley ~ D _--

Leo Beauchamp ~ D &cJ& William Longmaid - D Charles Felch - R4 --_ Elizabeth Moody - D Frank Palazzo - R' YYY Anne Warner - D Jon Beaulieu - R YYY Benjamin Moore - R -.. Gregory Warner - D _.. Charlotte Lister - D Francis TXiIhdeau - D -.. Douglas H. Currie. L NYY Horace Cressy - D ... James K. Wallack - L YYY Bedill Patricia O'Keefe .D -.. Charles Cote. R YYY Rock 30 Lm Beauchamp - D ... fbzxu Laura Pmwlakos - D* Ken Malcolm - R' RQ&Q Andrew Christie, Jr. - R* ... Rock 31 Marian Lovejoy - R .__Sharleene Hurst - R' ... MarthaClark - D* YYY Thomas Hemenway - R YYY Leroy Thayer - R' YYY JoM Stewart - L YYY Katharin halt - R -._PLQdix2 Dana E. Nonis - L ___ Edward Dunham - D ... Joseph MacDonald - D* ... Calvin Warburton - L ... Bonnie Groves - D -__ Harold Crossman. R ... Francis McNeil - D -_. Rock 13 James McDonough - D Rcck 33 MmL. watts. L YYY Wendell Ring - D Anthony Syracusa - D* ._. Jennifer Coon - D YYY Juanita Bell - D* N N N #I #2 #3 #I #2 #3 #1#2_-- #3

wlmmEw &rah ~ D --- Y N Y RdphTom-R' YYN ., . . Erlom Elliot - D ... SPBU Bill Knowles ~ D8 YYY Wliam McCann - D* -__ Robert Drye - R YYY Roland Hemon - D -__Peter Burling - D' NNN Gary Cilmore - DL YYY Raymond Bowles - R ... m Thomas Behrens - R" YYY Arthur Pellctier - D wl6 Baldwin Doming0 - D --- James Splaine - D* _.-David Mae- D -_- Merle Schotanus - R* YYY Harold Whirchouse. Jr. - R YYY Marsha Pelletier - D Paula Khey - R*

Ann Torr - R* Gordon Flint ~ R' -.-

Charles Reynolds ~ R Beverly Rodeschin - R' YYY FrankIin Ton - R Fred& Peyron - R" YYY sm2 Jim McMahon - L YYY Hsvey Tmm - D _-- &LLK Peter Franklin .. D ... Rdbat McKinley - R __-ARhurC~rn-R' Mlliam Kincaid - D'

sIS3.3 James Gaskell ~ R YYY William Tsiros - R* YYY al..&u Carol Starnatalcis - D' ___ Hdmy Sullivan - D. YYY Roben Boyk ~ D Ronald Chagnon - D ... Clair Snvda - D -SUI~6 Francis kmcent - Db Irene Domini - R' s3ias Donald Pagentle. D" folur O'Brien - D9 NNN Dana Hiltiard - R YYY

John Young ~ R* YYY Todd Marsh - R ___ Eric Lmdblade ~ R' J.mes York - L _-- Rea- R YYY James s&.& Donald Thompson, Jr. - R YYY

_-.Rose Ma~icRogers - D ~ D NNN YYY Frank Callaghan - D Charles Puksta - L ... James McManus - R Sm.6 w Elaine Hashem - Do _-- Ann Holl - D George Musler - R* BBY Richard Longo - D ___ Richard Kruega - R' Clyde Douglas. R' YYY -Stra I Sandra Kern - R* YYB Patricia Hambrick ~ D* _-. David Allison - D* Sual'l w Julie Brown - R' YYY sllllll

Kalherine Wheeler - D* _-- George Brown - D _-- Joan Kane ~ D Deborah Menia - D _-- Randall Bowen - L ... Lorraine Palma - D Amanda Menill - D* _-_ Jacqueline French - L ... John Middleton - X* SU2lUtIELodcr-D __- Robert Porter - R' I. Jcrrold Jackson - R _-- sua18

Donald Sumna - R .--Ravmond Lundbam ~ D ___ Pabicia Dunlap - R ...

Key: N No Y Yes B Blank Response - Refused to Respond * \vas not Surveyed * Denores an Incumbent

I NOTE: The N3tiOnd Right io Work Comrniitee, of cotme. endorses no candidates. We are a nonDartisan orp.anization. But we believe I YOU, as a Right io Work supporter, are entitled io know which candidates will supp& the righiof gvgy hirrerican to get or I keep ajob - without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. U.S. Senate Questions# 123456789 Judd Gfegg-R ------John Rauh-D ------Larry Brady-I YYYYYYYYY US. House of Representatives

Questions1): 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 District 1 Bill Zeliff-R YYYYYYYYY Bob Preston-D ------

aMrict 2 Dick Swett-D ------Bill Hatch-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Key: Y =Yes N =No - =NoResponse

Survey Questions

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the “services” 6. Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse IO accept that Campaign Act to prohibit thc use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidates opposed by union forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you suppon of Lhe provisions in federal hws which 7. Will YOU Oppose so-called “aiid-dnuble breasting” legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has, as its primary goal, to forcibly uniouize employees of construction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley Act. which authorizes state Right to Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act, which proiecu; federal employees from union political 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the feded anti-extortion statute? 9. Will you oppose legislation that would punish or require the tiring of employees who choose to work during a strike. and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal. state, give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees to pay union dues?

Note: The National Right to Work Commitlee. of course, endorses no candidates. We are a nonpartisan organization. But we believe that you as a Right to Work supporter are entilled to know which candidates will support the right of every Ameriwn 10 em3 living - without having to pay union bosses for the privilepe. 1 BACKGROUNDER ,. 9 The information below is helpful in enplainjng thc questions on the revase side of this form. 11 ’ 1. A union. under present federal laws, is empowered to Reorganization Act of 1970 and executive orders dating back LO i represent and bind all employees in a company’s bargaining the adminisuation of President John F. Kennedy. I unit - including employees who oppose the union and don’t want its “services.“ 6. Labor unions are the only private organization in he U.S. which can legally force individuals to pay dues into their I This monopoly bargaining power. generally described as “exclusive bargaining rights.” deprives employees of their right 1EaSUIiC.S. I The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) prohibits union i to bargain for ihemselves. Union officials fought for this power officials from giving any of these dues dollars directly to a i and refuse to give it up; yet they complain they are “unfairly candidate for federal office. burdened by the legal obligation” to represent nonmembers. 1 At the same time, FECA permits union officials to use Such complaints intended pave the way for compelling are to workers’ compulsory dues dollars for “in-kind” political ::., fmcial support from so-called “free riders” for representation ’ spending on goods and services to elect candidates for,federal ? they do not want. offices. g-1. .. The f~ngof workers who refuse to pay union dues and/or These “in-kind” expenditures are in addition IO union PAC 1s.k fees is explicitly sanctioned by both the National Labor contributions: they are seldom - if ever - documented or i i.;

~ Relations Act and the National Railway Labor Act reponed to the Federal Election Commission. No official statistics for total union “in-kind” expenditures ..+.~. Section 7 of the NLRA. for example, stipulates that .:.:.._ .. employees shall have “the right to refrain” from participating in are available. But Labor columnist Victor Riesel estimated that ; :* this so-called “soft money” amounted to 10 times more ban :i,1’- .. union activities ”except to the extent that such right may be j 1 affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor what union PACs gave in cash contributions. Based on that ’ organizluion sacondition of employment.“ yardstick, union “soft money” in 1990 exceeded 5350 million. .>.

TO : Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road Springfield, VA 22160 FRON :

..:.. ,.'~.. . ..,.. , ...... r.Lending me the'results of the Right.,to Work candidate Survey. To,make sure :.the.'candidates':,know. where"x stand .on Right to Workiissues, I.have: .. . - Contacted the candidates to urge them to support Right to Work. Enclosed a contribution of: i

Please make checks payable and return to: NRWC The National &&t to Work Committee's Washinwon DC IHeadqusrtcrs LS loc~led31 OW nation's noi- tal at 8M)l Br addock Rad. Suite SIXI Sorirrcfield. VA 22160 - Telcuhonc (8M) 325-7892, knuw the iRS hm mznizdNWC s) bx exempt under IRC Sec jOl(cJ(4). which mitsunlmited lobbnne rmtributiocs aw not OX deductible oscharitablecon~butions. Dear c'onuai ttee Member: Three strikes and you're 'Out. Senator Ernest Hollings wants another term as South Carol ina' s U .S . Senator. In the last few months, I have sent Senator Hollings Lixes letters pleading with him to tell his constituents where he stands on Right to Work. I've even tried certified mail. And &JJ, Senator Hollings outright refuses to answer his 1992 Candidate Survey; despite your postcards, calls, and letters urging him to answer.

-1 Clearly, Senator HOllingS is trying to hide his views on ~.~ c I compulsory unionism. And since presidential front-runner Bill Clinton is vowing to sign Big Labor's entire political agenda into,law, *re South Carolina's Senators stand on Risht to Work is crLt ical . Big Labor already has a veto-proof majority in the House of Representatives. And the U.S. Senate is teetering on the edge of falling totally under the control of union power brokers. If the union bosses have their way, Taft-Hartley Section 14(b) will be repealed in the 103rd Congress. As you know, if 14(b) is repealed, South Carolina's popular state Right to Work law will be automatically wiped outl But there is some good news. Senator Hollings's opponent, Tommy Harnett, has vowed to represent the overwhelming majority of South Carolina citizens by promising 100% support for Right to Work. Would you please contact Senator Hollings and those running for the House of Representatives and tell them 75% of South Carolina citizens want them to support their Right to Work. This year, the union bosses are licking their chops in anticipation of controlling &&h houses of Congress. They will stop at nothing to convince Senator Hollings to ignore his pro- Right to Work Constituents, and preasure Mr. Harnett into taking back his pledge. Thac's why it's absolutely that you contact the candidates and tell them to stand up for the people of South Carolina, and not give in to union-boss pressure. Unless you turn the heat all the way up, Senator Hollings won't tell you where he stands on Right to work. Senator Hollings is trying to stonewall Right to Work members. but his record in Congress speaks volUmeS. Senator Hollings has not exactly been a Right to Work advocate in the Senate. Just recently, he voted to block enforcement of the 1988 Supreme Court && ban on the use oE forced dues for politics. And Senator Hollings voted to allow Big Labor to dragoon 2.9 million federal employees, and countless private citizens into the union-boss political machine by voting to trash the 53-year- old Hatch Act. On the other hand, Tommy Harnett answered his survey in 100% support for Right to Work, and has pledged to Eight Big Labor power grabs in the Senate. The future of the Riqht to Work mav devend on where South Carolina's Senators stand on comoulsorv-unionism leqislation. -Work -Work stalwarts retirinq, Big Labor is ~~... . pumping millions of dollars into 34 states -- mudins South Carolina -- to buy a veto-proof majority in the Senate.

.....A .~....,.... Write, call and/or pay a personal visit to Senator .. Hollings -- as well as those running for the U.S. House of ....i,I- .. > Representatives in your area - before it's too late. Press Senator Hollinss to reoudiate his cozv relationshig with Biq Labor -- tell him you expect him to defend your Right to Work, not the powers and privileges of Big Labor. He can only ignore your protests so long. If you and other Right to Work members scream loud enough, you will force Senator Hollings to choose between the public interest and the union-boss suecial interest. Also thank Tommy Harnett for his pro-Right to Work pledge. Because of his stand against forced unionism, the union political machine has targeted Mr. Harnett. He's under intense pressure to compromise his position. Encourage him to remain firm in supporting your Right to Work. And I hope you'll do one more thing. Please return the enclosed Survey '92 Action Reply. This will let me know you received your Survey '92 results, and have contacted the candidates about their answers. That way I'll know when I have to crank up the volume even more. I've had to stretch my budget to conduct our Survey '92 program. So if you can, please include a special contribution of $200, $100, $50 or $25 to help cover the costs of this effort. But contact the candidates TODAY -- that's most imuortant. Sincerely,

Reed Larson P.S. Senator Ernest. Iiollings has refused to renounce his votes for forced unionism. If South Carolina citizen-g-uron-the GR 3

Flotlda cont. Florida cont. U.S. Senate Ouoillonf.: 123 4 5 67 89 .. . . OUQ8II08SI: 1 23 45 6 7 8 9 - - Richard Sholby-D ------YYYYYYYYY Richard Sellers-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y U.S. House of Representatives 0ueol)onso: 123456709 Dm=l& 1 Hllllan Brerar-D ------sonny Ca1lahm-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Dudat 2 GQorqo W*ll*ca. Jr.-D ------Terry Everett-R YYYYYYYYY GEORGIA OirtXM 5 Sonate Dhtdot 3 Karen Thuman-D US. Glen BI0udar-D --y _--_-- TO^ fiogm-a Queallons4: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Dan Siodqo-R YYYYYYYYP Wyche Foulnr, Jr.-l> ------Ol&rlot 6 (4041 331-0697 DenLon-D Phll Paul Coverdell-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y YY cllfford Steams-R U.S. House of Representatives OI.+rM 1 Dan Webscar-D QuesIIonsI: 1 2 345 6789 -R Dfotrlct 1 Rd rhara tlir i 5t rn.37-D Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 'I OImtlM 0 19111 001-1819 Chuck Kovaleakl-D Jack Klnqstnn-R YYYIYYYIY Blll Wolhnn-R Dbtrlof 2 DU4M 9 Sanford Biihop-D Michael Blllrakls-R 14041 374-3531 Cheryl Knapp-D Jim Uudley-R DhtZlot 10 Karen Moffltr-0 ARKANSAS Bill Y0"nq-R US. Senate aosaiionse i 23 4 5 6 78 0 Dlstrict 4 Dale Bunpars-D Y-Y Y Y Y Y -- Cathey SLrl"belq-1l Mike Il~~kdbeB-a KYYYKYYYY 1.1041 636-9110 John Linder-P US. House of Repreerentatlves Dintriot 5 Cnrosllonsa 123456780 John LEulS-0 nhtria i 12011 >25-3001 Blanche Lambciz-n ------Paul Srnbier-R ~erryiiayes-a KYYYYYYYY Dbatzict 6 mst~i&2 Tony CenLer-D _.__ Ray Thorton-O - - - - - .- New Glnqrlch-R YYYY YYYY DennlJ Scott-R YYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYNY DberLct 7 Dbtriat 3 Ge019e Oarden-D .... John VanHlnklo-D n ------N-Y--N-NN 14041 425-2820 Tlm Hutchlnaon-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y YKYYYYYYY A1 Bevcrly-R YYYY YYYY

Dbtrlot 4 Dbtrmt 16 DbCrlot 8 8111 MCCYOn-D ------John Comerford-D J. Roy Rowland-O __--..__ Jay Dickey-R YYYYYYYYY Tom LBUIS-R 12021 225-6531 Ilokrc Cunnlnqham-R YYYY YYYY tlutciat 11 FLORIDA Carrlo hk-0 Dbtrlct 9 Nathan Deal-U YYYY YYYY U.S. Senate o*mtriUt 1s 11061 281-1991 Hagda Davls-D Daniel Aeckcr-R NNYN YNNN Ileana RO3-IChtlnen-R ------DI.atrl& 10 8111 Grant-E YIYYYYIIY Dhtdbi 19 ------Don Johnson-D YYYY YYYY Harry John3ton-D - 1409) 245-9293 U.S. House of Reprosentatlves krry mtz-a YYYYYYYYY Ralph Iludqens-R YYYY YYYY OIJrollonB~123468789 OhtZLat 20 Dbtrlot 1 .. .. . Dhtrlct 11 Psror DaULsch-0 - - - - Cynthlr McKinncy-D ..-...__ -D YYYYYYYYY narllyn Bonllla-a** ------Terry KULChe1-R YYYYKYYYY 14041 241-5514 Beverly Kenncdy-R** K YY KY K Y Y Y Woodrow LOYelC-R YYYY YYYY Survey Questions 1. Do you believe an cmployee who docs not went the ''services'' of a 6. Will you support omendnientr Io the Fcdrral Election Campaign Act Iu labtr mion should have Ihc w refuse to ac02pt lhar union as his pohibit lhc UY alcompulsory union dues and fcci lor political causes trclurivt rcwmwiv+ which ledcrd law now lor- him 10 cccqn7 and cmdidalcr npporcd by union mmheid 2. Will you rupporr repeal of the provisions in fcdcral 1.w whish 7. Will you o~rssa-criied "anti.doul,lc brewing" lcgirlniiun lhrt has. auho~imcompvlsan unionhml ~1 its primmy goal. IO loreibly unbnirc employees al CO~~UUF~~UR 3. Do you favor prumnion of Section 14(b) of the Talt-Hullcy Act. cornpanics7 which irulhorirer mtc Right lo Work hwr7 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken of deslroy the Hatch Act. which 4. Would you aupport legislation to end the spccid immunity union poiceir fedcral employccr from union political cnrcionl ollicidr presently enjoy from prorecution under the lcdernl anti- 9. Will you opplrc legirlniiuo dioi would punish or rquirc he firing 01 caonion ,

- -I Now 7hu slional Rieht 10 Work Commitlec. of mum. rndones no candidalu. We arc a mnprlimn nrgmizsiion. nut we klicvc that uWJ u L Rial-1 10 Work ruppner Lis cnlM 10 bow whichcmdidnlcs will wppor1 $hexi8hi nl every Ammicm 10 EMI living - without having 10 pay union bsw lor Ihe pivilcgc. ! I. North Carolina cont. South Carolina cont. I MlSSISSIPPI auarllonsu: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Quedloniu: 7 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 House of Represen DhtXId U.S. J. Iloward Cable-R Y Y Y Y I 1 Y Y Y 5 .. . . John SpraZt-D - - QUeSllOnlI: 123456788 7 18011 321-1114 Dmrla 1 Dbtrlot Il0r"P-R YYYYY-YYY Charlie Role-D - - - .- - - - Willlam Janls Hhliten-D I ~otarcAnderson-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 18031 49d-2541 I' 12021 225-4306 Clvde WhlCakel-R Dhtriot 6 .. - .. .. - - Y Y Y Y '1 Y - Y Jim Clyburn-D YYYYYYYY I8011 929-CZ08 John Chase-R YYYYYYYIY Hikc Espy-0 I8031 669-0181 I6011 146-1400 Dorothy Banford-R TENNESSEE US. House of Representatives

16011 693-6681 Qu~~lIon?)#:123456789 Nlchnel Wllllami-R Dl=trlat John S~evens-D 4 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 1 Y nlke Parker-D Charles Taylor-R 16011 965-4085 Jack HcMlllan-R 16011 815-1291

DMriot 5 &ne Taylor-D I6011 582-3246 Paul llarvey-R NORTH CAROLINA US. Senate

US. House of Representatives QuesUonsr: 123456789

Dlntzht 2 Floyd Speoce-N YYYYYYV-Y 18031 254-5120 . .. - - - .- DUWM 3 YYYYYVYYY James Bland-R YYYYYYYYY 18031 641-1408 Butler Mrrlck-D Y Y Y - Y N Y - Y 18031 225-1301

Dbtr- 4 Llz PatteisOn-D .- - - - - .- - Key: (8031 582-3650 Y =Yes ~~be~cinqiis-n YYKYIYYYY I8031 242-6440 N =Nu - = Na Rerpiinse ** = Runuft in District BACKGROUNDER The informaion below is helpful in explaining llic qusrlionr on bc ISVCIIC ride or this form. 4

RIQET 'EO WORK ACTION REPLY

TO : Reed Larson, President National Right to Work committee 8001 Braddock Road Springfield, VA 22160 FROM:

,.,?.>,'I . . ' ,. ; ;l . Thank you for etending me tlao.resultsOP' the Right to Work Candidate Survey.' To make sure the candidates know where .Z stand on Right to Work issues, I have: - Contacted the candidates to urge them to support Right to Work. - Enclosed a contribution of:

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC .

I...

...... ^. , :,.-, ...... ,. ., .. I... i ... ..,. :; t.'...... _.~\ ! - .; i.:.... I

...... '!-,...... ~ ...... - ....-...... - f;

3 ...c; ... hA

..-. .

., ..', .... .r

7he National baht Io Work Committee's Wrshineton DC. H4sume1-s19 laatxi at our nahon's QPI- I(- A 22160 lWhQ PI at 8001 -4. ' dV Te Fe (sM)325-7892.hu set he IRS ha4 recomized NRMIC bxexembt &dm IRC Sec 50l(cK4)>which&&& un&nited lobbvink mlsam not @x deduch'ble as chan'table mntn'butions. NC

National Right to Work Committee 0 8WI Braddock Rd. + Springfield. VA221600 (8W)325.7892

October 5, 1992

Dear Conunittee Member: Three strikes and you're out. Senator Terry Sanford wants another term as North Carolina's U.S. Senator. In the last few months, I have sent Senator Sanford three letters pleading with him to tell his constituents where he ..:.;...... -. stands on Right to Work. .. ;: ! E :I_ I've even tried certified mail. And still, Senator Sanford outright refuses to answer his 1992 Candidate Survey; despite your postcards, calls, and letters urging him to answer. Clearly. Senator Sanford is trying to hide his views on compulsory unionism. And since presidential front-runner Bill Clinton is vowing to sign Big Labor's entire political agenda into law, where North Carolina's Senators stand on Risht to Work is critical. Big Labor already has a veto-proof majority in the House of Representatives. And the U.S. Senate is teetering on the edge of falling totally under the control of union power brokers. If the union bosses have their way, Taft-Hartley Section 14(b) will be repealed in the 103rd Congress. As you know, if 14(b) is repealed, North Carolina's popular state Right to Work law will be automatically wiped out! But there is some good news. Senator Sanford's opponent, Lauch Faircloth, has vowed to represent the overwhelming majority of North Carolina citizens by promising 100% support for Right to Work. Would you please contact Mr. Sanford and those running for the House of Representatives and tell them 75% of North Carolina citizens want them to support their Right to Work. This year, the union bosses are licking their chops in anticipation of controlling &!tJ houses of Congress. They will stop at nothing to convince Senator Sanford to ignore his pro- Right to Work constituents, and pressure Mr. Faircloth to take back his pledge. That's why it's absolutely vmthat you contact the candidates and tell them to stand up for the people of North Carolina, and not give in to union-boss pressure. Unless you turn the heat all the way up, Senator Sanford won't tell you where he stands on Right to Work. Senator Sanford is trying to stonewall Right to Work members, but his record in Congress speaks volumes. In 1990 and 1992, Senator Sanford voted to overturn the 1988 Supreme Court I&& ban on the use of forced dues for politics. Again and again, Senator Sanford has voted to force workers to pay for political causes they don't agree with. NC

A few months ago, only massive public outcry from North Carolina citizens -- lead by you and other Right to Work members kept Senator Sanford from voting for Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill (S. 55/H.R. 5). Senator Sanford waited until the last possible minute to vote against Ted Kennedy's bill -- he knew his vote would not put the union bosses over the top. As you know, if this bill passes, union bosses will call any strike they wish, and win any strike they call. easy as pushing a button -- bankrupting small businesses and throwing workers off their jobs. Now Senator Sanford wants you to give him another term. And without massive protests from North Carolina-citizens now, I'm afraid Senator Sanford may vote to give the union bosses the Pushbutton Strike bill after the heat is off next year.

The future of the Riqht to Work my deoend on where North Carolina'sostandon-unionism leuislation. With several RiQht to Work stalwarts retiring, Big Labor is pumping millions of dollars into 34 states -- includins North Carolina -- to buy a veto-proof majority in the Senate. Write, call and/or pay a personal visit to Senator Sanford -- as well as those running for the U.S. House of Representatives in your area -- before it's too late.

.. . :i-~ Press Senator Sanford to reoudiate his COZY relationship i..- 2 .-. I with BiQ Labor -- tell him you expect him to defend your Right to .I! ..~. Work, not the powers and privileges of Big Labor. He can only ignore your protests so long. If you and other Right to Work members scream loud enough, you will force Senator Sanford to choose between the & interest and the union-boss soecial ititerest. Also thank Lauch Faircloth for his pro-Right to Work pledge. Because of his stand against forced unionism, the union political machine has targeted Mr. Faircloth. He's under intense pressure to compromise his stand. Encourage him to stand firm in supporting your Right to Work. And I hope you'll do one more thing. Please return the enclosed Survey '92 Action Reply -- so I'll know you received your Survey '92 results, and have contacted the candidates about their answers.

I've had to stretch my budget to conduct our Survey '92 program. So if you can, please include a special contribution of $200, $100, $SO or $25 to help cover the costs of this effort. :DAY .- h 's most im ort nt. Sincerely,

P.S Secator Terry Sanford has refused to renounce his votes for forced unionism. If North Carolina citizens pour on the p2 suwuort RiQht to Work. Contact him today. GR 3 - R OF FEDERAL CAN ES ALABAMA Florida cont. Florida cont. U.S. Senate auertionrii: 1 2 3 4 s 6 7 8 s Oussllonr Y: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 Dbtrlot 2 Dl.trld 11 OuesllonsII: 123 4 5 678 9 Pete PeLar,a"-o ------I - Lincoln Dlaz-Odlart-R ------Rlchilrd Shelby-D ------Ray Wdqner-R YYYYYYYYY Richard Scllera-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y DLatrkt 22 DbtrM 3 Gwen Margo119-0 - .. ------. US. House of Representatives Corrlno 0rown-D** Clay Shau-R - - .- .- - - - Andrew Johnson-0'. Steve Kcllcy-R** YYKYYYY-Y DMrlof 23 Don Wcldnor-R** YYYYYYYYY -De* - - .- .- - Alcoe HdStlnU.-D** NNNNNNNNN DbtrM 4 Ollver Pdrker-R'. ------MdtLor 1ldlC-D Ed Fleldlng-R*. YYYKYYYYY 1904) 398-0900 Tllllo Fouler-R GEORGIA Dlatrlat 5 -0 U.S. Senate TO^ iioqan-~ OuesUonaa: 123456789 Wyche Fouler, Jr.-D Dbtrloe 6 ------14041 331-0691 Phll Dcncon-D Paul Y Y Y 'I Y Y Y Y Y Cllfford Srearnr-R Coverdell-R ,... U.S. House of Representatives .. DbtrM 7 .. . . Dan b!&xLer-D i.. . I i T:j John Mica-R . . .. YYYYYYYYY Dbtrlat 8 KOvaIeskI-D Chuck Jack King~~an-R YYYYYYYYY Blll McCollum-R Dimtrht 2 DbtrM 9 Sanford Bishop-D Mlchaal Blllrakls-R 14041 324-35:! Cheryl Knapp-0 Jlm Dudley-R DMZlat 10 Dhtrlat 3 ARKANSAS Karen Mofflrr-D Rlchard Ray-D Bill Younq-R 14041 561-3J64 Mac Colllns-R Dbtrlat 11 -0 Dlatriot 4 Mark Sharpe-R Cnchsy Stclnberg-O (4041 636-5110 DMrlat 12 John Llndor-R Charles Canady-R Tom Him*-D DWL1at S John I.evlr-D Dhtrlof 13 12021 225-3801 Rand snell-D Paul SLabler-R Brad Baker-Re' YYYYYYYYY Dan Mlllor-R*. Y Y Y 'i Y Y Y Y Y Diotrlot 6 Tony Cenrcr-D DIatrlat 14 NW ~inqrich-R Porter Gw5-R YYYYYYYNY DfiltXM I DMrlat 15 George Oarden-0 Jlm Bacchus-D N-Y--N-NN 14041 025-2820 Blll Tolloy-R YYYYYYYYY AI Bcverly-R Dlstrlat 16 DIatXlofJ. ROY Rouland-0 0 John Comerford-0 .- - .- .- . Tom buls-R YYYYYYYYY 12021 225-6511 Robcir Cunnlnqham-R Dldriot 17 FLORIDA Carrle *et-D DbUlat 9 Nathan Ooal-D YYrrYYYYy U.S. Senate Dbtziat 10 17061 201-1992 Maqdd OdVII-D Oanlel Oecker-R NNYNY YNNN lleana Ros-Lchclnen-R ------Dierlat ¶O a111 Grant-R YYYYYYYYY Dbtziat 19 Harry Johnston-D - - .. ------Dan Johnson-D YYYYYYYYY House of Representatives (4041 245-9293 US. Larry WL1-R YYYYYYYYY Ralph Hudqons-R YYKYYYYYY aueailonsI: 123456789 Dbtrlat 20 Dlstrloe Dintriot 1 Derei Doursch-D - .- .- .- .- 11 Earl Il"tLo-0 YYYYYYYYY Bonills-R.. - - - - CynLhla UcKlilney-0 Marllyn - - - - - 14041 243-55'14 Terry Ketchel-R YYYYYYYYY Y Y Y 7 Bcverly Xcnnedy-R.. Y Y Y Y Y modrow LOWLL-R Survey Questions

1. Do you hlicvc M cmplaycc who doer not Want the ''IErVices'' of a 6. Will you ruppfl amcndmenlr 10 Le Fcdiral Elcction Campaign Acl ID labor union should have the righl to rcfurc 1O accept La1 Union &s his prohibit the UIC ofcampulrary union dues and leer lor political cmsa exclusive rcprcreniative. which ledera1law now forcer him 10 awcpl? and candidaes apposed by union members? 2. Will you support repeal oi Ihc provisions in federal laws which 7. Will you aplarc ro-enlld "onti-double brcaning" lcgirlalion Ln has. aulhorizc compulsory unionism? SI ils primary goal. tu forcibly unionirc ernployccs of consumlion 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14(b) ai the TafI.Hartlsy Aci. companim? which authoriicr Righl Io Work laws? slilc 8. Will you oppose legidnlion 10 wcvkcn or destroy lhe Hatch Act, wl"ch 4. Would you support Icgirlatian to end Ihc rpccial immunity union poteclr fcdcral ernployecr ham union political carcion? officials presently enjoy from prosccution undcr thc federal anti. 9, will you oppore leBislaljon D, satortion IlSlUlS? employees who ehoors to work during a IU*E.ud give union officials 5. Will you oppoic the forced unionization of icdcral. stale. cauniy and Le powcr IO shut down buiincrrci hat rcfurc to fora Lck mploycci municipd employ^^^? IC pay Union ducr?

Note: The National Right to Work Comrnitlct. ofmurre. mdoncs no candidBa. We PC a nonpnniran organiistion. But we bclicve Lat you u IRight ID Work rupponer KC enlillcd ID how which cnndidaisr will $upport Le right alevery hericm ID ema living - wihout having 10 pay union barrer for Le privilcgc.

~~~ MISSISSIPPI North Carolina conl. South Carolina cont. U.S. House ot Represent auastionad): 123456789 auosiionso: I 2 3 4 5 67 8 9 J. Hawaid Coble-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y DktZiot 5 . . . . auosiioni u: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B @ John Spratt-D - - - - - nhtriot 1 18011 377-1114 Jamie Whltten-D .- .-. - - - - Willlam tioriic-R YYYYY-IYY 1202) 225-4306 10031 494-2641 Clyde Whltakcr-R Y Y 1 Y 1 'I 1 Y Y 16011 842-8191 nutriot 8 Dlntrict 6 w. G. 1lef"et-D YYYYYYY-Y Jlm Clyburn-D - .------. DistIiat 2 Coy PrlveLtc-R YYYYYYYYY IROI) 9z9-070~1 Hlko Espy-D - .- - - - .- - Joho Chasc-R YYYYYYYYY 16011 J46-1400 (8031 669-818) Dorothy Benford-R ------

rJlOtr1at 3 TENNESSEE t. v. -sonny* U.S. House of Represenlatlves mntgonery-o YYYYYYYHY 16011 693-6601 Ouosllon9s: 123456788 Hlchaol Hllllaml-R ------

I6011 965-4005 Jack HcNlllan-R YYYYYYYYY 16011 015-1291

nhtr1aC 5 ten0 Taylor-D ------16011 502-1246 P~UInarveY-R YYYYYYYYY SOUTH CAROLINA U.S. Senate DUtriot 4 CAROLINA Jlm Caawr-D NORTH QuesUons#: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 B Dale Johnson-R U.S. Senate fritz noiiinqJ-o ------18031 719-8400 Distrlot 5 Ouerllona#: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 9 Tommy Hartnett-R Y 1 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Hob Clsmenc-D Teriy Sanford-D ------18031 804-4244 Tom Stone-R Lauch Fa1rCloth-R Y Y Y Y Y Y I Y Y U.S. House of Reprosentallves DUtricit 6 U.S. House of Represenlatlves Hart Gordon-D aueitianri: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 e Mdr3h.3 Blackburn-R 0uoshns.s: I 23458780 DlStrM 1 Dhtzlot 1 Blll 0beISt-D _-_-_.__~ Dutrlot 1 EUd ClayLO"-D - - - - - .- - . la031 521-4946 David Davls-D Ted Tyler-R YYYYYYYYY Arthur Ravenel, Jr.4 Y Y Y 'I Y Y Y A Y Don Sundquist-R I0031 122-0114 Diat*i& I DULrlot 8 Tlm Valentlno, Jr.-D ------Dlstriat 2 John Tanner-D Dan Oavls-R YYYYYYYYY Floyd Spence-R YYYYYYY-Y 18031 254-5120 District 9 Harold Ford-D - .. . . .- . D4ntl.M 3 Chorles Black-R YYYYYYYYY Jam3 Bland-R YYYYYYYYY 10031 641-1408 Butler. Dorrlck-D Y Y Y - Y N Y - Y 180Jl 225-5301

Key: 10031 502-3650 Y =Yes Robert Inglls-R YYYYYYYYY 10031 242-6440 N =No . = No Response ** = RunulTin Distrlcl RIGHT TO WORK ACTPOM REPLY

TO : Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road Springfield, va 22160 FROM :

_..l _..l .. . i.._ 5 Dear Reed: ....I i i

Thank you for sending me the results of I the Right to Work Candidate Survey. To make sure the candidates know where stand on Right 1 to Work issues, I have: Contacted the candidates to urge them to - support Right to Work. - Enclosed a contribution of:

I_ $200 $100 $50 - $25- Othi Please make checks payable and return to: NR!IWC !

i

L

The National Rivht to Work Committee'sWashineton D.C. Headmartem is laared at OUT nation's api- tal at 8001 Braddock Road. Suite 5M) Sorinefield. VA 22160 e Teleahone (Boo) 3257892. Because the IRS has reromized NRTWC as lax exempt under IRC Sec 501(c)(4). wspermits unlimikd Iobb~nG Donhibutions are not BYdeductibleas charitable rnntrib~@!.~ National Righl lo Work Commiitec 0 8M)I Braddock Rd. 0 Springlicld. VA 22160 0 (8W) 325-7892 October 5, 1992 Dear Committee Member: Three strikes and you're out. Congressman Byron Dorgan wants to be 's next U.S. Senator. In the last few months, I have sent Congressman Dorgan three letter8 pleading with him to tell his constituents where he stands on Right to Work. I've even tried certified mil. And w,Congressman Dorgan outright refuses to answer his 1992 Candidate Surrvey; despite your postcards, calls, and letters urging him to answer. Clearly, Congressman Dorgan is trying to hide his views on compulsory unionism. And since presidential front-runner Bill Clinton is vowing c .. to sign Big Labor's entire political agenda into law, where North I!...... Dakota's Se nators stand on Riaht: to Work is critical. Rig Labor already has a veto-proof majority in the House of Representatives. And the U.S. Senate is teetering on the edge of falling totally under the control of union power brokers. If the union bosses have their way, Taft-Hartley Section 14(b) will be repealed in the 103rd Congress. As you know, if 14tb) is repealed, North Dakota's popular state Right to Work law will be automatically wiped out! But there is some good news. Congressman Dorgan's opponent, Fargo Commissioner Steve Sydness, has vowed to represent the overwhelming majority of North Dakota citizens by promising 100% support for Right to Work. Unfortunately, , one of the candidates vying for North Dakota's U.S. House seat is following Congressman Dorgan's lead by refusing to say where he stands on Right to Work. Would you please contact Mr. Dorgan and Mr. Pomeroy and tell them 75% of North Dakota citizens want them to support their Right to work. This year, the union bosses are licking their chops in anticipation of controlling houses of Congress. They will stop at nothing to convince Congressman Dorgan to ignore his pro- Right to Work constituents, and pressure Mr. Sydness into taking back his pledge. That's why it's absolutely vuthat you contact the candidetes and tell them to stand up for the people of North Dakota, and not give in to union-boss pressure. Unless you turn the heat all the way up, Congressman Dorgan won't tell you where he stands on Right to Work. Congressman Dorgan is trying to stonewall Right to Work members, but his record in Congress speaks volumes. Representative Dorgan has been one of Big Labor's most reliable water carriers in Congress. Last June, he hclped union- boss lobbyists ram Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill (H.R. 5/S. 55) through the House by a 247-182 vote.

As you know, if this bill passes, union bosses will call any strike they wish, and win any strike they call, easy as pushing a button -- bankrupting small businesses and throwing workers off their jobs. And Congressman Dorgan voted to allow Big Labor to dragoon 2.9 million federal employees, and countless private citizens into the union-boss political machine by voting to trash the 53-year-oldHatch Act. Congressman Dorgan constantly votes in lockstep with Big Labor demands, and unless North Dakota citizens overwhelm him with protests, he will continue to follow the same path as your .., U.S. Senator.

j.. ..~ ..... On the other hand, Fargo Commissiorier Steve Sydness answered .....I :.2 his survey in 100% support for Right to Work, and has pledged to 'i ...'i 3 .... .-.. fight Big Labor power grabs in the Senate. of n wher North ..- The fut.ure the Rish3 n .. DGn. .-~.. ~.~ ..-:I- With several Riqht t 0 Work stalwarts reti'ru, Big Labor is i-.e.=: i pumping millions of dollars into 34 states -- includinq North Dakota--- to buy a veto-proof majority in the Senate. Write, call and/or pay a personal visit to Congressman Dorgan -- as well as those running for the U.S. House of Representatives in your area -- before it's too late. Press consressman DOrqan to reoudiate h is cozv relation- with Ric. Labor -- tell him you expect him to defend your Riqht to Work, not the powers and privileges of Big Labor. He can only ignore your protests so long. If you and other Right to Work members scream loud enough, you will force Congressman Dorgan to choose between the Q!&JA,G interest and the union-boss soecial, interest. Also thank Steve Sydness for his pro-Right to Work pledge. Because of his stand against forced unioniam, the union political machine has targeted Mr. Sydness. He's under intense pressure t5 compromise his position. Encourage him to remain firm in supporting your Right to Work. And I hope you'll do one more thing. Please return the enclosed Survey '92 Action Reply. This will let me know you received your Survey '92 results, and have contacted the candidates about their answers. That way I'll know when I have to crank up the volume even more.

I've had to stretch my budoet to rnnduct. nwr SII)LVL~~'92 program. So if you can, please include a special contribution of $200, $100, $50 or $25 to help cover the costs of this effort. But con tact t he candidates TODAY -- t hat's most imoortant.

P.S Congressman Byron Dorgan has refused to renounce his votes for forced unionism. Jf North Dakota citizens oour 0n thg essure. he might feel the heat and se e the lisht _- and suooort Riqht to Work. Contact him today. I. Nebraska cont. w 1sco NS I N Wisconsin cont. Questions #: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3 3 3~s~:i-= a '...... :.-;-, . . . . - . . .. ".... ,.. ..

3iatrict 3 i ...... ' ..,. ~ ...... - - - - - ,. .i!V<. : I.,;.:,.;,:..:: ~..,.I,,: - , . i ... , .. ,. U.S. Senate I Questions Y: t 2 3 J 5 6 7 8 9 I ' -...--.... an-; .- .- - - - . . : ., I ',, , : .. , , 1 ;Le.,, SydceSS-.? ..... ~... U.S. House of Representatives Questions 1: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 i ;;!I:. ;,:~ersy-C .. . . - - - I 1^.. ~ .?e- , , .. , : . . : , ..: I.,.... ~.I_>, x-? .... . ~. 1 =-. = .i.. .! , :? z 11: SOUTH DAKOTA U.S. Senate

3J.S. House of Representatives Key: -- I Y =Yes ! N =No 1 - =No Response L IOWA Minnesota cont. Ouesrionst: 123556739

- . - - .- - ..

I .I i ., . ., , . , ., .,.

District 5 - - - - .- - .-

,,',YY.,Vi.,'......

NEBRASKA U.S. House of Representatives Questions#: 123456789 MINNESOTA Dintzict 1 U.S. House of Representatives (luestions1: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 District 1 1..--i ?enny-D ------153'1 375-I:Bi Survey Questions SD

Naiionnl Right IO Work Commiiiee e 8001 Braddock Rd. 0 Springfitid. VA 22160 Q (800)325-7892

October 5, 1552 Dear Committee Member: Three strikes and you’re out. Senator wants another term as South Dakota’s U.S. Senator.

.. In the last few mcnths, I have sent Senator Daschle ... letters pleading with him to tell his constituents where he k!.. .. . stands on Right to Work. i’i. ~. I’ve even tried certified mail. -* .. And u,Senator Daschle outright refuses to answer his .-.~- , 1992 Candidate Survey; despite your postcards, calls, and letters *. ji urging him to answer. Clearly, Senator Daschle is trying to hide his views oii compulsory unionism. And since presidential front-runnerBill Clinton is vowing to sign Big Labor’s entire political agenda into law, where South Dakota’s senator3 sta nd on R isht to Work is critical. Big Labor already has a veto-proof majority in the House of Representatives. And the U.S. Senate is teetering on the edge of falling totally under the control of union power brokers. If the union bosses have their way. Ta€t-Hartley Section 14(b) will be repealed in the 103rd Congress. As you know, if 14(b) is repealed, South Dakota’s popular state Right to Work law will be automatically wiped out! But there is some good news. Senator Daschle’s opponent, Charlene Haar, has vowed to represent the overwhelming majority of South Dakota citizens by pledging 100% support for Right to Work. Unfortunately, Congressman Tim Johnson, who is seeking another term as South Dakota’s member in the U.S. House of Representatives, is following Senator Daschle‘s lead by refusing to say where he stands on Right to Work. Mr. Johnson’s opponent, John Timer, answered his survey in full support of protecting your Right to Work. Wocld you please contact Senator Daschle and Congressman Johnson and tell them 75% of South Dakota citizens want them to support their Right to Work. This year, the union bosses are licking their chops in anticipation of controlling houses of Congress. They will stop at nothing to convince Senator Daschle to ignore his pro- Right to work constituents, and pressure Mrs. Haar into taking back her pledge. That’s why it’s absolutely that. you contact the candidates and tell them to stand up for the people of Souch Dakota, and not give in to union-boss pressure. Unless you turn the heat all the way up, Senator Daschle won’t t 1.1 you where he stands on Right to Work. Senator Daschle is trying to stonewall Right to Work members, but his record in Congress speaks volumes. Senator Daschle has been one of Big Labor's most reliable water carriers in the Senate. Just recently, he helped union- boss lobbyists come within just three votes of quashing debate, and ramming Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill (H.R. 5/S. 55) through the Senate. As you know, if this bill passes, union bosses will call any strike they wish, and win any strike they call, easy as pushing a button -- bankrupting small businesses and throwing workers off their jobs. And Senator Daschle voted to allow Big Labor to dragoon 2.9 million federal employees, and countless private citizens into the union-boss political machine by voting to trash the 53-year- old Hatch Act. Senator Daschle constantly votes in lockstep with Big Labor demands, and unless South Dakota citizens overwhelm him with protests, he will continue to follow the same path if South Dakota voters send him back to Washington. On the other hand, Charlene Haar answered her surv'ey in 1000 support for Right to Work, and has pledged to fight Sig Labor power grabs in the Senate. The future of the Risht to Work may deuend on where South Dakota '8 Senators stand on compulsory-unionism lesislation. With several Risht to Work stalwarts retiring, Big Labor is pumping millions of dollars into 34 states -- includins South Qj&&&j -- to buy a veto-proof majority in the Senate. Write, call and/or pay a personal visit to Senator Daschle -- as well as Congressman Johnson -- before it's too late.

Press Senator Daschle to reuudiate his COZY relationship with Bis Labor -- tell him you expect him to defend your Right to Work, not the powers and privileges of Big Labor. He can only ignore your protests so long. If you and other Right to Work members scream loud enough, you will force Senator Daschle to choose between the interest and the union-boss awecial interest. Also thank Charlene Haar for her pro-Right to Work pledge. Because of her stand against forced unionism, the union political machine has targeted Mrs. Haar. She's under intense pressure to compromise her position. Encourage her to remain firm in supporting your Right to Work. And I hope you'll do one more thi g. Please return the enclosed Survey '92 Action Reply. ThiP will let me know you received your Survey '92 results, and have contacted the candidates about their answers. That way I'll know when I have to crank up the volume even more. I've had to stretch my budget to conduct our Survey '92 program. So if you can, please include a special contribution of $200, $100, $50 or $25 to help cover the costs of this effort. But contact the candidates TODAY -- that's most imuoreant.

Reed Larson P.S. Senator Tom Daschle has refused to renounce his votes for forced unionism. If south Dakota c itizens uour on thg pressure. he miclht feel the heat and see the lisht -- and ~PwOrtR isht to Work.. Contact him today. s GR 5 I Minnesota cont.

U.S. Senate Senate Ouestions #: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8~~ 9 us. Timothy Droogsma-A Y YYYYYYYY QuesUons1Y: 123456789 QuesUonsiU: t23456789 (507) 387-7801 Jean Lloyd-Jones-D ------Geri Rothman-Serot-D ------Charles GrassLey-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y y Y Christopher Bond-R ------DLBtrM 2 David Minge-D U.S. House of Representatives US. !-rouse of Representatives (6121 269-8863 Cal Ludeman-R Questions#: 123456789 Questions#: 123456789 (507) 354-1994 Oi&Pi&l Distri4t 1 Jan Zonneveld-D NNY-YYYYY W?.lliam Clay-D DiStrlnt 3 Jim Leach-R YYYYYYYYY Arthur Mntgomery-R Paul Mandell-D Jim Rarnstad-R ~iak2 LJiStrict 2 1612) 884-0266 David Nagle-D NNNNNNNNN Joan Horn-D Jim Nussle-R YYYYYYYYY Jam; Talent-R DLatrht 4 Bruce Vento-D ..Uetrld3 D.%&xM 3 1612) 225-4577 -hlaine Ekxter-D ------_ .... ~.. Richard Gephardt-D Ian Maitland-R i.. i aim Light foot-R YYYYYYYYY Mack Holekamp-R 1612) 645-8412 ...... itp4 DiStriat 4 Direriot S I:. ea1 Smith-D ------Ike Skelton-D Martin Sabo-D Paul Lunde-R YYYYYYYYY John Carley-R Stephen Moriarty-R

:=ni&riot5 Dirtriof 5 Diat.ziut 6 CFrd Grandy-R ------__ 7.. Alan Wheat-D Gerry Sikorski-D <;-! Edward Moody-R Rod Grams-R !'i 1612) 422-8570 DMrM 6 .. . ._ Pat Danner-D DMrbt 7 i' , Tom Coleman-R Collin Peterson-0 6: 1 US. Senate Bernie Omann-R (612) 654-6911 .- Questions#: 123456789 DMrM 7 i..kloria O'Dell-D ------Patrick Deaton-D Me1 Hancock-R Dintriot 8 Epb.. Dole-R YYYYYYYYY . ... James Oberstar-D U.S. of Representatiwes D-M 8 Phil Herwig-R House Thad Bullock-D YYYYYYYYY 1612) 369-4143 Questions#: 123456789 Bill Emerson-R --YYYYY-Y Dktriut 1 Duane West-D ------DirtrM 9 -R YYYYYYYYY Harold Volkmer-D RLck Hardy-R U.S. House of Representatives -2 -D ------Questions #: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Jim Van Slyke-R YYYYYYYYY District 1 NESO Gerry Finnegan-D ---_-_--- lxEtl%& 3 US. House of Representatives (402) 477-3730 Tom Love-D ------_ Doug Bereuter-R YYYYYYY-Y -R YYYYYYYNY Questions 1: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 3 DLstrict 1 Dbtrict 2 atstrict4 Tim Penny-0 ------Peter Hoagland-0 ------Dan Glichn-D --y -----_ (507) 835-1184 Ron Staskiewicz-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Eric Yost-a YYYYYYYYY Survey Questions 1. Do you believe rn employee who does not want the "services" of a 6. Will you suppon amendments u, the Federd Election Campaign Act to labor unjon should have he right 10 refuse 10 accept ha union a his prohibit the use of compulsory union dues and fees for political causes exclusive representative. which federal law now forces him 10accept? and candidates opposed by union mcmkrs? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in federal laws which 1. Will yor! oppose so-called "antidouble breasting" legislation that has. authorize compulsory unionism? as its primvy goal. lo forcibly unionize employees of consuuction 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. companies? which authorizes smte Right to Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation fa weden or destroy heHatch Act. which 4. Would you support legislation 10 end the special immunity union protects federal employees from union political coercion? officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal anti- 9. Will you oppose legislarion that would punish or he extomon statue? require ruing of employees who choose to work during a strike. and give union officials 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal. state. county and hepower shut down businesses hat refuse 10force heir employees municipal employees? 10 pay union dues?

~~~~ ~ Note: The National Right to Work Committee. of cuurse. endorse no candidates. We are a nonpartisei organization. But we believe hat you ns a Righr lo Work supponer are entitled M know which candidates will support the right of every American to ema living - wiihour having 10 pay union bosses for ihe privilege.

~ ~- Wisconsin cont. I . Jebnska cont. W *.QuesUonsX: 123456789 Question?,#: 123456789 District 8 i % ------3 Questions# 123456789 Cacherine Helms-0 Lawe?? Fisher-D ___------Russell Feinqold-0 ------Toby Roth-R YYYYY YYY? 3ill Barrett-R YYYYYYYYY Robert Kasten, Jr.-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y - Y Dbtrict 9 Questions#: 123456789 Ingrid Buxton-D - - I ------DiartrM I. James 1 Les hspin-D _____---- Sensenbrenner, Jr.-R - Y YYY Y Y Y Y Mark Neumann-R Y-YYYYYYY I U.S. Senate Questions#: 123456789 DLtsFct 2 Ada Deer-D 3yron Dorgan-D ------Kluq-R Steve Sydness-R YYYYYYYYY Scott U.S. Mouse of Representatives DL+rM 3 Paul Sacia-D ------Questions# 123456789 Steven Gunderson-R - - earl Pomesoy-D ------+lorn Korsmo-n YYYYYYYYY DistrM 4 , I I: Gerald Kleczka-D ------<:.; 1 ::; Joseph Cook-R YYYYYYYYY L.,.. . DL+rM 5 ..e- ! ------is Thomas Bdrrett-D I U.S. Senate Donalda Ann Hammersmit h-R YYYYYYYYY L. Questions#: 123456789 rCn, DascNe-D ------DirtrM 6 Cbarlene Haar-R YYYYYYYYY ------jli Peggy Lautenschlager-D Thomas Petri-R ------U.S. House of Representatives Key: .~~. DirtrM 7 Y =Yes ._.~ QueslionsO: 123456789 David Obey-D ------N =No '& Johnson-D Dale Vannes-R - = No Response Jahn Thr-R YYYYYYYYY

;-:j~. 1 .... ~ .::,.., ..

BACKGROmER The infomiation below is helpful in explaining the questions on the revase side of hii form. :. h Urum undcrprrmu f0dP.l Lw.L empowd to rcp-=zmt md bid aU anploye in chldce gwm~.=dby de Pcsld Rwrpnizatim An d !970 and exuvtivc ordm dating back yy'shrg-g Unu - Lrludiq qloymwho -c the mion and dm't wvu ils u) hsamnLunnlaon of Rsridmt John F. Kmdy. ImncQ- 6. bbor unions am ths only private orgmktion in dc U.S. whish can IsgaUy forcs individh u) pay dun inu) thclr t-riu BIGPET TO WORX ACTHQPJ REPLY

TO : Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road Springfield, QA 22160 , ;.

..~I. .I. . FROM: ......

, i! ...... ?,...... >.,. .

- $200 $100 .- $50 - $25- Other Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC

. P

i

... .---. I . ::.>

L ret

A COALITION OF EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYERS

REED URSON. Preria*nf

October 26, 1992 Dear Georgia Mder: Right to Work is in deep trouble. Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the Union bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip over the U.S. Senate. .- .~ ... .. _._ .....: /> If Organized Labor takes control over both the White House . i_-: and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in i'i jeopardy -- including your own. Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'll work to repeal Sectibn 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work laws. I have taken emergency action to alert Georgia citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify your Right to Work law. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support for compulsory unionism. In case you missed it, I've attached a copy of the advertisement we are running this week in the Albany Herald. Similar versions are running iiz newspapers in Right to Work states across the country. I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads not only in Georgia, but also in other Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed over $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending power grab.

WASHINGTON O.C. HEAOQUARTERS: 8001 BRAOOOCK ROAO. SUITE 500 SPRINGFIELD. VIRGINIA 221B0 * TEL. (703)321-9820 "Americans must haw lhe right bul nor be compelled !o join labor unions" But I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support COmpUlSOry unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to join a union to feed his family. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they're still listening. Please, please, call Governor Clinton IMMEDIATELY at 1 (900) 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is morally wrong, and economically disastrous for Georgia. And call Senator Wyche Fowler, a candidate €or Georgia's U.S. Senate seat, and urge him to publicly oppose compulsory unionism and defend your Right to Work law. And if you can, please send a special contribution today to help us cover the additiofial cost of this last-minute advertising blitz. Georgia's Right to Work law may depend on it. Sincerely,

Reed Larson P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft- Hartley Act, thousands of Georgia jobs will be lost. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ads. I

Cali Curernvr Biii Ciiniun PII l6Ml3ZS-WFZ Caii Senator \Vyche Fowior 1 (44341 331-0657

's A Warning to Georgia Workers. Small Businesses. Taxpayers and Consumers From Ihe National Right lo Work Committee Bill Clinton and Wyche Fowler Want to Force Senabr Wyche Fowler also Betrays Georgia's You to Pay Union Dues to Work in Georgia Rigkt to Work Law

As Gumnor. Bill Clinton bneccd-L. P~QOUIhis bwv's Rwhi to Just a iew months ago. Senator Fowler voted WCCE Io Work law to lure new jobs adWLIII burincrwr IO Arianu. enact Senator Ted Kennedy', Fxshbuaon Smke bill IS. 551. In fact. Arkan-' %ght to Work I11wlwhich allows workers to Tl~cStnke bill would have forccd workers to strike. Union choose whclhcr or not to pay union dues) enabled Bill Clinton "uiganizen" would cd1 virtually any strike lhey wish and to host dat his sule "rank 1st tn rhc country in gmwd of win any rmke they in&. Employers could bc forced to tirc new jobs.. , md 4th in income incrcw." workcn who disobey union stnkc orders. I 'Whatever Y'aM Want': Clinton Trades IiSensior Fowler hdprevalcd. Kcnnedy's Pirhbunon Right to Work for Big Labor Support Stnke bill would have blown a gapping hole in Georgia's Right I to Work law Kennedy's Smkc bill fell just 3 YOICPrhon of But to win the ruppan oi Orgsnizcd Labar's massive passape In rhhc US.Senate . . . no ro Scnvw Fowler. political michine (which dumps UVC~5350 million into icdcnl electcons each ycari. Bill Clinton now promises the Senator Fowler is widi frum YOU AR-CIO hc'll bctny htr own ruie youn by -ad - Hundreds of Gcarp members of the National Right IO rc~alingall ?IIWIC Right to Work laws. Work Cammiitce have contnctcd Senator Fowler urging him In his cimpargn book. Purring Pcnplr Firs. Bill Clinton to answer the Committee'\ Candidate Survey. But Senator wmtc thc magic .*or& unron ocficids IO wat to hcar "I Fowler relbrcr to IC11 you whcthcror not hc'll dcfcnd your wppn rcpcal of Section lab1ofrhc Tdi.Hmlcy Act." Right to Work law next year Seciton lUbl uthonzes state lcgisl~turcrtoenact Right IO Senator Fowler.\ upponcnt. Paul Coverdell. plcdpcs to Work IJW,. Repal Sectiun i4 tbi wouid rcpcii ail 21 ui suppon Right IO Wurk. 1W9 - dipccmlly Georgia's Right ~alcRight to Work laus - including Gccrgn'r. to Work law. Sendlor Fowler ,hould publicly vow 10 suppon Unlor you change Bill Clinton's mind. hc and Senator Right to Work. too. Wychc Fowler may rcpeal your Right to Work law and force lens of thousands oiGeargra workers 10 pay union dues or Union Controi over the White How and be tircd. Rousnmk ofjobs Umld be lorrfomver Congress = Ford Unionism ...... UNLESS YOU TURN BILL CLINTON AND WYCHE HELP SAVE GEORGIA'S RIGHT i FOWLER AROUND ON RIGHT TO WORK NOW. union TO WORK! power broken may be able to pass juri about aiy law hey Tell Clinton and Fowler not 10 force Georgia j want tn the first 100 days oi a Clinton Adminirmtton. workers to psy union dues. Right now is the kst lime. Now's when the pliticians This dvcnircmcnt is pard for with volunmry conmbuuonr ! arc ~ttlllistenins IO YOU. Give 'cm an euful. imm Georgia mcrnbm of rhe Nalmnal Righz to Work Cornmince ! who klicvc that cvrry WO~~LI~should have !he nghl. but nM tx cornpllcd. Io p!n a union $0der Io yct or keep -A job. To help pruirct Ccurgm'r Right 10 Work law. dchy the EDII ui thn Advcniwment. or ior more miomition rmcludmg copes ! oi zhc odidacs' Right 10 Work C~nddiieSuwey\t. plr~: j 1) Call 1 18001 325-7892. or 21 Mail B contribution .,wvable to NRTWC. 8001 Bnddock Rwd. 11500, Springncld. VA 22160. .

ICunVltuilomnnxlnllrllurllhr I Emergency Citizen ctien Re

To : Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite 500 Springfield, Virginia 22160

Reed : With Bill Clinton vowing to destroy Right: to Work, and with Big Labor on the verge of buying a lock grip on the U.S. Senate, I want to help turn the heat all the way UD on Governor Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. I have: __ Called Governor Bill Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. __ Enclosed a contribution tc pay for the ads you are already running in newspapers across the nation: __ $1,000 __ $500 __ $200 __ $1.00

- $25 I_ Other ($ )

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC. The National Right to Work Committee's Washhaton D.C. Headauarters is Iocatt? at OUT nation's =Pi- la1 at 8fm Br addcck Ro ad. Suj& 500 Saringfield. VA 22160 Telephone (8M)) 325 -7a92. ~eca~ IRS has recomized NRnnlC as hxexempt under IRC Sp contributions are not tax deductibleascharitableconhib~itions. 1') ' I

October 26, 1992 ! Dear Member: ...... _..j5:... _...... Right to Work is in deep trouble. <.!I-~ li'i-.__ Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union

But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running chese ads not only in Idaho, but also in other Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting OR your future support, I have already borrowed over $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending power grab.

WASHINGTON D.C. HEADOUARTERS: 8001 BRADDOCK ROAD. SUITE 500 0 SPRINGFIELD. VIRGINIA 22160 TEL. (703)321-9820 "Americans musf have fhe right but nof 88 COf?1pell8d io join labor unions"

~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ But I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support compulsory unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to join a union to feed his familv. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they're still listening. Please, please, call Governor Clinton IWDIATELY at 1 (800) 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is morally wrong, and economically disastrous for Idaho. And call Congressman Richard Stallings, a candidate for Idaho's U.S. Senate seat, and urge him to publicly oppose compulsory unionism and defend your Right to Work law. And if you can, please send a special contribution today to help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising blitz. Idaho's Right to Work law may depend on it. Sincerely,

Reed Larson P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his wily and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft- Hartley Act, thousands of Idaho jobs will be lost. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ads. Call Governor Bill Clinton at I (800)325-9992 Call Congressman Richard Stallings al 1 (208)336-1992

A Warning Io Idaho Workers. Small Businesses. Taxpayers and Consumers from the National RighI to Work Commjllee Bill Clinton and Richard Stdings Want to Congnessm;m Richard Stdings also hmys Force You to Pay Union hato Work in Idaho Idaho's Right to Work Law Aa Govcmur. Bill Clinton brdggcd ah~this SWIG'S Kght to Last yc% Congrerman Stallings voted to cnilct Senator Work 1.w 10 iurc new job, md smdl buaiiiC>s$Lo rLlmnia. Ted Kmncdj'i Pushbutton Stnkc hill :S. 55). Ilhe Stnkc In fm. Arlwrwr' Right ro Work 1a.o iwhich airows *.o&rrm hdl would have foorccd worken ro mike. Union "orgmiLerS" chmv whclcr or not to pay union dua) cnablcd Bill Clinton would call vinually any mike they wish and win any sVike lo bast that his suu ''ranks 151 in thc counlry in gmwth of they incite. Employers could be forced to fire workers who I new jobs. . .ind 4th in income incrcu." Jisoky union strike ordcn. 'Whatever Y 'all Want': Clinton 'Rads Right IfCongrerrmanSl4iings had prevailed. Kennedy's Pushbutton Stnke hill wuuld have blown P gaping hole in to Work for Big Labor Support Idaho's Right to Work law. Kennrdy'r Strike bill sailed But IO win thc ruppm of Organlrcd Labor's massive through the U.S.Hourc of Repmwntativcr . . . thanks to poliucd machine (which dumps over $350 million into Cungrcrrmin Stallingr. fedcml ~lccttonseach ycw. Bill Clinton now promiscr the AFLCIO he'll betray his own sate - and yours -by repealing dl 21 S141C Righ! to Work laws. Hundreds of Id&" mcrnberj of thc National Right 10 In his cmprign b0o)i. Pulling Proplc Firrr. Bill Clinton Work Committee have contacted Conaressman Stallinm wmtc th: magic words union officials so want to hcm: "I support repeal of Sstxon IJlbl ofthe Taft-Hartley Act: Scction 14bl authonz~sstale icgislaruwr io en& Righc IO Work laws. Repeal of Scction I4ib) would rcpnl all 21 S~PLRighl to Work laws - including ldaho's. Utrlcs you change Bill Clinton's mind, hc and Scnau: Candidatc Rich& Sldlingr may rcpul ywr Kghl to Work publicly v&v tu suppan Right to Work. too. law and forcc tens of thousands of I&o workcrs 10 pay union 'Union Control over the Walite How and ,-~---.------~Con- = Forced Unionism I u- UNLESS YOU TURN BILL CLINTON AND RlCHARD i HELP SAVE IDAHO'S RIGHT TO WORK! ! STALLINGS AROUND ON RIGHTTO WORK NOW union power broken m;ly be able to pass just about my law j workers tu pay uiuan dues. thcy wmin thc fin! lo0 days of3 Clinton Adminisualion. Right now is the best rime. Now's when the politicians : from Idaho mcmbcm of rkc Nauunrl Wighi IO Work Commttec arc std lirlcning Io YOU. Givc 'em an earful. ! who bclirvr Lhl CVCN worker should haw the fight. huc not be ! From:

To : Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite 500 Springfield, Virginia 22160

Reed : With Bill Clinton vowing to destroy Right to Work, and with Big Labor on the verge of buying a lock gri? on the U.S. Senate, I want to help turn the heat all the wav UD on Governor Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Sew. I have: - Called Governor Bill Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate.

__ Enclosed a contribution to pay for the ads you are already running in newspapers across the nation:

- $1,000 __ $500 I_ $200 - $100

- $25 __ Other ($ )

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC. -The Nanonal Ri&t to Work Committee'\ Wshmmon DC, Headquarters u located at our nation 9 e?!- UBoo1 Braddock Road. Suite 500 Sonnvheld. VA 22160 Teleohone (ROO) 325-7892. Bpc3u& IRS bm rrcow~izedNRTWC as tax exempt under IRC Sec 501(c)(4). which oermits unlimited Icbbwng. conmbubons are not tax deductible JS chantable conmbubons iaflonal Right To ark Committee

A COALITION OF EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYERS

REED URSON. Preildenf

October 26, 1992 Dear North Carolina Member: Right to Work is in deep trouble. .... -. i;._ .! ...~...... ~ - ~. Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union .~ .....ii%.. . bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip ever .=. . ~...... ~. , the U.S. Senate. If Organized Labor cakes control over both the White House and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in jeopardy -- including your own. Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he’ll work to repeal Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work laws. I have taken emergency action to alert North Carolina citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify your Right to Work law. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support for compulsozy unionism. In case you missed it, I‘ve attached a copy of the advertisement we are running this week in the Raleigh Sews & Observer and the Greensboro News & Recorq. Similar versions are running in newspapers in Right to Work states across the country. I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads not only in North Carolina, but also in other Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee’s financial limits. Counting on your future supportl I have already borrowed over $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor’s impending power grab.

WASHINGTON D.C. HEAOOUARTERS: 8001 BRADDOCK ROAD, SUITE 500 0 SPRINGFIELD. VIRGINIA 22160 TEL. (703)321-9820 ”Americans must have the right but not be comDelled lo ioin labor unions” But I need your additional support right away to cover the coscs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support compulsory unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to join a union to feed his family. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they’re still listening. Please, please, call Governor Clinton IMMEDIATELY at 1 (800) 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is morally wrong, and economically disastrous for North Carolina. And call Senator Terry Sanford, a candidate for North Carolina’s U.S. Senate seat, and urge him to publicly oppose compulsory unionism and defend your Right to Work law. And if you can, please send a special contribution today to help us cover the additional cost of this last-mintite advertising ,blitz. North Carolina’s Right to Work law may depend on it. Sincerely,

Reed Larson P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft- Hartley Act, thousands of North Carolina jobs will be lost. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ads. .

4

Call Governor Bill Clinton a1 1 ISM)) 325-9992 Call Senator Terry Sanfnrd a1 I IRW)) 722-1992

~~ 1 A Wamiug IO NodCarolina Workers. Small Buinaser, Taxpayers and Consumers from the Natiod Rl&t to Work COmmitIet ' Bill Clinton and Terry Sanford Want to Force You to .§enator Terry Sanford Farces Workers to Fund BQ Pay Union Dues in Order to Work in North Carolina Lahor PoWs- Including HiF Reelection As Governor. Bill Clintoi, brnggcd about his rote's Right Just 3 few weeks ago. Senator Sanford voted IO kcep llrc io Work law io lure new .!oh 3nd ma11 huvncws 1" fcrctd ducr union bosws skim fmm Amencan workcrs' Arkansas. In fxt. their Right IO Work law iwhich ~llows pwkccr flowing into his mleciion bid. Sanford voted to wnterr to chmw whether or not IO pay union dues) cnnblcd block implemcnution of the Supreme Coun'r 1988 Beck Bill Clinton IO baut La1 "Arkms;ls ranks 1st In thc country decision. which outlawed the UIC. of workcrs' forced dues for in gmwth of ncw jobs and 4th in incomc wrcu." union politics. 'Whatever Y'all Want': Clinton %des Right to If Lniltor Snnioni had prevailed. the dcslruction of Beck Work for Big Labor Support would have bankmllcd Big Labar's polilicd machine wifh forccdducr wages imm workers - money which Big Labor But io win ihc suppon of Organized Labor's massivc 15 spending to mlect Terry Sanford. The pmporal to gut political machine (which dumps ow5350 million into Bed $11 psi 4 voles shon of passragc in the U.S.Senate ... no fcdenl elections each ycul. Bill Clinton now promises fhc thanks to Senator Sanford. AFL-CIO he'll bcmy his own IUIC- and youn -by repealing all ?Ismtc Right IO Work laws. Senator Word is Hiding from YQU In his c.mpaign book. Puning People First, Bill Clinton Hundreds of NohCarolina rncrnkrs of llrc National wmc the magic words union officials so want to hear: "I Righi 10 Wort Commincc have conractcd Sssator Saniord by suppon repeal ofScclion IJlbl aifhc raft-Hanky Act." phone. by mal. and by poscd. urging him to answcr he Sccrion I4b) 3UthO"ZCs sue legirlarurrr to enact Right 10 Cornmince's Candidate SUNCY. But Senator Sanford refuses Work laws. Repeal of Scrlion lab) would repeal all ?Isale to icII you whcthcr or not he'll defend your Right io Work eight io Nark laws - including Nom Carolina's. law "Cll yew. Unlcrr you change Bill Clinton's mind. hc andTerry Senator Sanford's opponent. Lauch Famloth. pledges Io Sanford may rcpcd your Right to Work law and force icns of ~ppnRight to Work 100% -especially Nonh Cmlinn'r lhourands of Nonh Carolina workcrs io pay union dues or k RlgBt to Work law. Senator Sanford should publicly vow to Sml. Thofiourands ofjobr would bc lor~fom~er wppn Right to Work. too. UNLESS YOU NRN BILL CLINTON AND TERRY SANFORD AROUND ON RIGHTTO WORK NOW union HELP SAVE NORTH CAROLMA'S RlGKT TO WOW! power bmkcrr may bt able to psrr just htany law thcy Tell Cllnton aid Sanford no1 10 (om Nonh CamUna want in fhe firs1 100 days of a Clinton Administration. wor?icn to pny union dua Righl now is the bcst limc. Now's when the politicians This dvmiument is pud for wiih volun- conmbutionr arc still listening to YOU. Give 'em an euful. from Nanh Cyolinr mcmbcrs of the National Right to Work Commincc who klmcIhU every vwkcr rhodd haw the nght. but na bc mmpelled. IOpin a unmo 10ordcr IO st M keep P I&, To help pmtect Nonh Cmlina'r Rqhi ID work law. deiny iRe COY ol this aducn!wmcnl. or for mure inlormation (including CDP~EI of thC cnndndnlrr' Right to Work Cwdidalc Sutvcyrl. pku: llCdl1800l315-7892,or 2) Mall a contribution mvablt IDNRTWC. From:

TO : Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee SO01 Rraddock Road, Suite 500 Springfield, Virginia 22160

Reed : With Bill Clinton vowing to destroy Right to Work, and with Big Labor on the verge of buying a lock grip on the U.S. Senate, I want to help turn the heat all the way up on Governor Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. I have: __ Called Governor Bill Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. - Enclosed a contribution to pay for the ads you are already running in newspapers across the nation:

__ $1,000 ~ $500 __ $200 - $100

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC. The National Ri&t to Work Committee's Washineton D.C. Headquarters is lea!& at our nation's cwi: tal at Boo1 Braddock R oad. Suite 5W * Smeld.VA 22160 9 TeleDhone (BIN) 325-7892. Because the IRS hareco~izcd NRTWC as tax exemDt under IRC Sec 501(c)(4),which permits unlimited lobbving, contributions are not tax deductible as charikblecontributim, onel Right.?a rk Committee .. _- A COAUTION OF EMPLOY& -AND EMPLOYERS

REED URSON. Pr#rldonl

October 26, 1992 Dear Member: Right to Work is in deep trouble. Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip over the U.S. Senate. If Organized Labor takes control over both the white House and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in jeopardy -- including your own. Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'.ll work to repeal Section 14ib) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work laws. I have taken emergency action to alert Nevada citizens that Governor Ciinton intends to nullify your Right to Work law. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support for compulsory unionism. In case you missed it, I've attached a copy of the advertisement we are running this week in the Elko Presq and the Reno Gazet te Journal. Similar versions are running in newspapers in Right to Work states across the country. I a! doing everlthing I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help.

Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 OF $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads not only in Nevada, but also in other Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed over $300,000 to alert ths American people to Big Labor's impending power grab.

WASHINGTON D.C. HEADOUARTERS: 8001 BRADDOCK ROAD, SUITE 500 * SPRINGFIELD, VIRGINIA 22160 TEL. (703)321-9820 "Amencans must have Kls fight but no1 be compel/ed 10 join labor mons'' I-. . . NV

But I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to yo any further into debt. ?lease help me make the politicians who support compulsory unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who :q believe that :q ni n t his familv. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) zround on Right to Work, NOW, while they’re still listening. Please, please, call Governor Clinton IMMEDIATELY at 1 (800) 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is morally wrong, and economically disastrous for Nevada. And call Senator , a candidate for Nevada‘s U.S. Senate seat, and urge him to puhlicly oppose compulsory unionism and defend your Right to Work law. And if you can, please send a special contribution today to help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising ,blitz. Nevada’s Right to Work law may depend on it. Sincerely,

Reed Larson P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft- Hartley Act, thousands of Nevada jobs will be lost. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ads. 1953:

.. ;.. I :.,i .:I .....,.. i... ~, .~ .~.. ~1 ..~......

Call Governor Bill Clinton at I ~800)325-9992 Call Senator Hnny Reid 31 1 1702) 598-199

- w? A Warning to Nevada Workers. Small Businesses, Taxpayers and Consumers from lhe National Right 10 Work 5i Clinton and Harry Reid Want to Forre Senator fimy Reid also Retrays Nevada's You to Pay Union Dues to Work in Nevada Right a0 Work Law As Gumnor. Bill Clinmn bnggcd about hrr SLUC'S Righi to Juri a icw months ago. Senator Rcrd voted wire toenacr Work law io IURnew jobs and small busincsscs to Ahnws. Senator Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill 6.55). 7he In fxt. iukmw' Right to Work law Iwhich allows rorkrr to Stnke bill would have forced workers io ruikc. Union chow wkIher or no1 to pyunion ducs) cnablcd Rill Clinton "orgmzen" would call vinually any suikc lhcy wish and to boat that hs SPW "&1st in Ihe counvy in pmhof win any rinke they Incite. Employers could bc forced to fire new jobs.. . mdWI In momc mcmzc" workcn who disobey union stnke orders. 'Whatever Y'aU Want': Clinton %des If Senaior Reid had prtvatled. Kennedy's Pushbunon Smke bill would have blown o @ping hole in Nevada's fight 10 Right to Work for Big Lahr Support Work law. Kennedy', Smke bill fell just 3 wales shon of But to win the suppn of Orgonrzed Labor's massive pzwgc ~nhe U.S. Sen- . . . no thanks to Senator Reid. political machine lwhich dumps over 5350 million into fedenl elections each yew. Bill Clinion now promius Ihc Senator Reid is Hiding from YOU Am-CIO he'll ktnyhis own sutc .-and youn - by HundxLof Nevada members of the National Right to all SPIC 10 waling 21 Right Wohlaws. Work Committee have conlasted Senator Reid urging him IO In his cmpatgn bock. Purling People Firsr. Bill Chon answer the Committec'r Candidate Survey. But Senator wmv the magic words union o6cials 50 want to hem "I Reid refuses to tell you whether or not he'll defend your ruppon repd of Section 1Nb) of Ihc Taft-Hartley Act." Righi to Work law next yex. Section I4bIauthonus state Icgislatum to enact Right to Scnaior Rcids opponent. Dcmm Dahl. plcdgcs to ruppon Work laws. Rcpeal ofkuon 14 (bl would repal all ?I %ght io Work ILW4 - crpecially Nevada's Kighl 10 Work state Right to Work laws - including NevJda'r. law. Senator Rc!d should publicly vow io suppon Right to Unlcrs you change Bill Clinton's mind. he md Senator work. 100 Harry Reid may rqzal your Righi to Work law and force tens of thourmd.5 ai Nevada worken io pay union dues or be Union Contd over the White House and fired. Thxwdsofjobr would br lor: former Con- = Forced U~oh -~------~ UNLESS YOU TURN BILL CLINTON AND HARRY SAVE NEVADA'S RIGHT TO j REID AROUND ON RIGHT TO WORK NOW! union HELP WORK! power brokers miy be able to pass just about any law Icy Tell Clinton and Reid not to force Nevada workers 1 want in ihc first IW days of a Clinton Administration. lo pay union dum Right now is the kittime. Now'r when the politicians Thir advcntwrnenc IS pad lor with volunrary crrnmbutiani ; are sit11 liswning to YOU. Give 'cm an earful. irom Nevada mcrnbcn of Iht National Righi Io Work Carnmittcc who bclicrc ilul every worker Thould hare the nghi. but not be I compcllnf. mpn1 union I" udzr Io gel or keep J )ob. To hclp prniecl Ne\ulr'i Right IO Wcxk lw. dciny (hc cost ; of lhir zdvemumcnc. or for more tniormruon tmcluding copics j ofthc candillucs' hghtlo Work Cnndidxc Survcy>l. plcaw: ; 1) Call I 1800) 32.7892. or 2) Mpil a contribullon oavablc to NRTWC. .! From:

TO: Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite 500 Springfield, Virginia 22160

Reed : With Bill Clinton vowing to destroy Right to Work, and with Big Labor on the verge of buying a lock grip on the U.S. Senate, I want to helo turn the heat all the wav up on Governor Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. I have: - Called Governor Bill Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. __ Enclosed a contribution to pay for the ads you are already running in newspapers across the nation:

__ $1,000 I_ $500 - $200 ~ $100

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC. ....

The National Ripht to Work Committee's Washinaton DC Headausrters IS located ~t our nation's aDi- tal et 8001 Braddock Road. Suite 500 Sunnef idd. VA 221647 TeleDh one 1800) 325- 7892 YxJllc IRS has recomwcd NRTWC as tax exempt under IRC 0%~ SOl(c)~w~ichpermits unlimited lobbwna conm$uhons are not bxdeductible as chanteble contnbubons UT

.,. ^. A COAUTION OF EMPlWYEES AND EMPLOYERS

REED URSON. Pmrldonl

October 26, 1992 Dear Utah Member: Right to Work is in deep trouble. Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip over the U.S. Senate. If Organized Labor takes control over both the White House and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in jeopardy -- including your own. Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he’ll work to repeal Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work laws. I have taken emergency action to alert Utah citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify your Right to Work law. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support for compulsory unionism. In case you missed it, I’ve attached a copy of the advertisement we are running this week in the Ogden @-inex. Similar versions are running in newspapers in Right to Work states across the country. I am doing everything 1 can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads not only in Utah, but also in other Right to Work states? I am litexally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee’s financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed over $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor’s impending power grab.

WASHINGTON D C HEAOOUARTERS 8001 8RA000CK ROAO. SUITE 500 SPRINGF!ZLO. VIRGINIA 22180 0 TEL. 1703) 321-9820 “Americans musl have fhe righf buf not be compelled lo lorn labor unions” b. ..

But I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further into debt.

Please help me make the politicians who support COmpUlSO?7y unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to i‘oin a union to fee$ his familv. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they‘re still listening. Please, please, call Governor Clinton INMEDIATELY at 1 (800) 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is morally wrong, and economically disastrous for Utah. And call Congressman Wayne Owens, a candidate for Utah’s U.S. Senate seat, and urge him to publicly oppose compulsory unionism and defend your Right to Work law. And if you can, please send a special contribution today to help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising blitz. Utha’s Right to Work law may depend on it. Sincerely,

Reed Larson P.S. If Governor Clinton Sets his way and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft- Hartley Act, thousancis of Utah jobs will be lost. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ads. '"PII

c u t to r

'Whatever Y'all kVant': Clinton Trades Right to Work for Big IAor Support

Hands Off the Fdomand .Jobsof Utah Citizens! .. From:

To : Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite 500 Springfield, Virginia 22160

Reed : With Bill Clinton vowing to destroy Right to Work, and with Big Labor on the verge of buying a lock grip on the U.S. Senate, I want to heir, turn the heat all the way UD on Governor Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. I have: - Called Governor Bill Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. - Enclosed a contribution to pay for the ads you are already running in newspapers across the nation: - $1,000 __ $500 __ $200 __ $100

- $25 - Other ($ )

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC. ,. . '.

The National Ripht to Work Committee's Washineton D.C.Headauarters is located at OUT nation's -Pi- ta raddock Road. Suite 5(M Sorinefield. VA 22160 T o e IN) 375-7892. Btmuse th i$;t?&kized NRnnlC as tax exemot under IRC Sec 5Ol(c)(~)?%~ zrmits unlimited lobbvin; contributions are not tax deductible as charitable contributionq A COALITION OF EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYERS

REED URSON. Pmltdenl

October 27, 1992 Dear South Carolina Member: Right to Work is in deep trouble. i ;'-i ! Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union 1 5:. bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip over , El , . r3 the U.S. Senate.

5 =. If Organized Labor takes control over both the White House , L. -..- j j, and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in ii ;:/ jeopardy -- including your own. Bill Clinton ha5 promised the AFL-CIO he'll work to repeal - ~... Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section iJ 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work .. laws. LTTI- cj I have taken emergency action to alert South Carolina citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify your Right to Work law. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support for compulsory unionism. Enclosed, please find a copy of an advertisement I am sending to newspapers throughout South Carolina. Similar versions are sunning in newspapers in Right to Work states across the country. I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads not only in South Carolina, but also in other Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed more than $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending power grab.

WASHINGTON DC HEADOUARTERS: 8OC1 BRADDOCK ROAD, SUITE 500 e SPRINGFIELD. VlPGlNlA 22160 e TEL. I7031 321-9320 "Americans musl have lhe righl buf no1 be COrnOeIled to join labor unions" SI

But I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support compulsory unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to ioin a union to feed -. -. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they're still listening.

Please, please, call Governor Clinton IMMEDIATELY at 1 (800) 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is morally wrong and economically disastroils for South Carolina. And if you can, please send a special contribution today to help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising blitz. South Carolina's Right to Work law may depend on it. Sincerely,

P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft- Hartley Act, thousands of South Carolina jobs will be lost. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ad. 19541993Y P

Call Governor Bill Cllnlon at 1 (800)325-9992

A Warning IDSoulh Carolina Workers, Small Busioerscs, Tarpayers md Consumers from the Yalional Right to Work CommitIa

RiU Clintnn Wants tn Fnrw Yois tnPm llnion “rote Ihc magic wuads unim ofkids so wult 10 bur. ‘I

inton Trades Right Union Control over the WhiteHouseand ork for Big Labor Support Congress = Forced Unionism But to & of Orgadb’s massive UNLESS~~~JTIJRYBILLCLINTONAROUNDON pdiuml machioc (which dvmps over 5350 millim into RIGHT TO WORK NOW. uiun power hhKmay be ablc I& elezimr uch year). BiU Clinton now pomiw the (0 pu just about MY law &cy want in rbe frst 100 days of n AnClOhs’Ubrmyhisopns~te-~dy~~-by Clinrm Adminisaatiion. rrplling 111 21 suk Right to Work laws. Right now is the bal time Now’s when the politicians ln his crmpigo bwk. Puling Peopk Firsr. Bill Qiton IIC ruli iisming w ruu. Give *mUI ~arfu~.

HELP SAVE SOUTH CAROrn,\’S RIGHTTO WORK!

Hands and

PM 1) Clll 1 325-7891.or 2) Msll a roolribullon pmysblc to NRTWC, 8001 Bmddock Rod. Moo. Springfield. VA U16a I~QEaUlMIl“~.~) The National Rieht to Work Committee'sWashington D.C. Headauarters is located at our nation's cad- &,I at 8001 Braddwk Ro ad. Suite 500 * S&@eld. VA 22160 0 Teleph one &300) 325-789%. Beauwthg IRS has recotmized NRWC as tax exempt under IRC Sec SOl(d(4). which wn=!!s unlimited lobbvin& contributions are not tax deductible as charitable contributions c

From:

TO: Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite 500 Springfield, Virginia 22160 Reed: With Bill Clinton vowing to destroy Right to Work, and with Big Labor on the verge of buying a lock grip on the U.S. Senate, I want to help turn the heat all the way UD on Governor Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. I have: - Called Governor Bill Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. - Enclosed a contribution to pay for the ads you are already running in newspapers across the nation: __ $1,000 __ $500 - $200 - $100

- $25 - Other ($ )

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC. ht

A COALITION OF EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYERS

REED URSON. Pmmam

October 27, 1992 Dear Alabama Member': Right to Work is in deep trouble. Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip over the U.S. Senate. If Organized Labor takes control over both the White House and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in jeopardy -- including your own. Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'll work to repeal Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work laws. I have taken emergency action to alert Alabama citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify your Right to Work law. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support for compulsory unionism. Enclosed, please find a copy of an advertisement I am sending to newspapers throughout Alabama. Similar versions are running in newspapers in Right to Work states across the country. I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads not only in Alabama, but also in other Right to Work states? I am litexally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed more than $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending power grab.

WASHINGTON DC HEADOUARTERS. 8001 BRADDOCK ROAD SUITE 500 SPRINGFIELD. VIRGINIA 22160 * TEL 17031 321-9820 "Americans must have the right but nor De compelled lo ioin labor unrons" AL

But I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support compulsory unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to ioin a union to feed his or her familv. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they're Still listening.

Please, please, call Governor Clinton IMMEDIATELY at 1 (ROO) 325-9992 and tell him his support €or compulsory unionism 1s morally wrong and economically disastrous for Alabama.

" And if you can, please send a special contribution today to si help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising 0 blitz. Alabama's Right to Work law may depend on it. Sincerely,

P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft- Hartley Act, thousands of Alabama jobs will be lost. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ad. !.‘ . , I !

Cali Governor Bill Clinlon at 1 (8031 325-9992

Bill Clinton Wants to Force You to Pay Union wae the magic wads union omciab LO want 10 hur: “I suppat repeal of Seuion 1qb) af&e Tdc-Hutley Act.’. Dues to Work in Alabama Smim 14@) iulhaksue legislalures io cnsa Righl lo As Gwema. Bill Clhm ha&@ ihua his sum‘s Right IO Work laws. Repiof Scstim 14@) would mpeii dl 21 sxa.uj Wdhw 10 lun ncwpbs and small buricsp~IO Man- Right lo Woe laws - including Alzha’r. h~~s‘RightIOW~Irw(PbichrUowrMrhrlw In Unlas you chlnge Bill Chum‘r mind. he md a =cy) Big choose &a (1 D(I IO pyunim duu) enabled Bill CIhx Usx cmwlled Sammay rcpnl ywRighr IO Wdr IN 1O~~bi~~P”~~lsi*~~~~in~~dncwmd forcc vnr of thousands ofAlabsmn uakeir IO pyUnim *... Wd 41h in incmre incruu” dues cu bc ft. Thcuraha/iobJ wwld C /mI/orm,: ‘Whatever Y’all Want’: Clinton Trades Right Union Control over the White Mouseand to Work for Big hbor Support Congress = Forced Unionism But IO rwin.lhe NWof Orgtnhcd Labor’smassive IINLESS rou nrrw BEL CLLYIYN ARO~ON poliliol machine (which dumps ovnf35D .milliw inlo RIGHT TU WORK NOW. uiw power troken may be nblc fcderrl elreurns ucb yur). Bill Clinton now porniseel he 10 pss just abut my law they wmnt in lhc fit 100 days of a AFLCIO ha‘ll bemy his own IUP - wid yarn -by CUnlar Adminirmtion. rrpulmg dI 21 sule Right 10 Work hws. Ri&t now is bebut umc Now’s when thc polilickns are SUIlimning lo YOU. Give ’em an earful.

RIGHTTO WORK!

i &yw%-Ha. - BrnbSi - tu P I To klp-*l.brmr’sRl$tthII WOn b-. i 6klynl-oollhLa~orn.rrlar~ &ranmlnl (M,u+a PI uli E.odibrer’ i R1~~wOn~s~),p~: . .?

From:

To : Reed Larson, President National- Right to Work Conunittee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite 500 Springfield, Virginia 22160

Reed : With Bill Clinton vowing to destroy .Right to Work, and with Big Labor on the verge of buying a lock grip on the U.S. Senate, I want to help turn the heat all the way up on Governor Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senace. I have: - Called Governor Bill Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. - Enclosed a contribution to pay for the ads you are already running in newspapers across the nation: __ $1,000 __ $500 - $200 __ $100

- $25 I_ Other ($ )

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC. manorial beht to Work Cornm~ttec'sWashmEton DC Headquarters ISIoG::~ at our nahon's WPI- 5Wl 0 bnnefield. VA 22160 TeleDhone (800) 57892 the tal atSOQLBraddwkB_Ro&Swte ~ 32 kr~se IRS has recomized NRlWC as tax exempt under IRC Ser. 501(c)(4).which Dermits unlimited lobbving. g&&ibulions are not tax deductible 3s charitable contributions. ..

A COALITION OF EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYERS

REED URSON. Pioilden1

October 27, 1992 Dear Arkansas Member: Right to Work is in deep trouble. Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip over the U.S. Senate. If Organized Labor takes control over both the White House and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in jeopardy -- including your own. Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'll work to repeal Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work laws. I have taken emergency action to alert Arkansas citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify your Right to Work law. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support for compulsory unionism. Enclosed, please find a copy of an advertisement I am sending to newspapers throughout Arkansas. Similar versions are running in newspapers in Right tci Work states across the country. I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads not only in Arkansas, but also in other Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed more than $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending power grab.

WASHINGTON D.C HEADOUARTERS' 8001 BRADDOCK ROAD, SUITE 500 8 SPRINGFIELD, VIRGINIA 22160 0 TEL. (703)321-9820 "Americans must have rhe righl bul nor be compelled to join labor unions"

~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ - ~ ~~ 9ut I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support compulsory unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to join a union to feed his or her familv. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they're still listening.

Please, please, call Governor Clinton IP4MEDIATELY at 1 (800) 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is morally wrong and economically disastrous for Arkansas. And if you can, please send a special contribution today to help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising blitz. Arkansas' Right to Work law may depend on it. Sincerely,

P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14b) of the Taft- Hartley Act, thousands of Arkansas jobs will be lost. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ad. Bur io win de suppon of Chglnizcd Mrmasiivc IINLESS YOU TUP3 BILL CLINTON AROUND ON political madinc (which dumps over 5350 million inka RIGHT To WORK NOW, union power Omkcrs may bc ablc fcdml clstims each ycu). Bill Clitm now porn& Ibc to prrjus1 abutmy law they want in de fist 1W days of a AnUOhe‘ll brmy his owSUP. - and ym- by Clincon Adminisnation. repuling dl 21 s(1v Right u) Work law. Righi now is the ktlime. Now’s wha the politicimi In his cmpignbmk. Punning Ptople Finr. Bill Clinlm am roll liiming w YOU. Give ‘man earful.

HELP SAVE ARRILLYSAS’S f RIGHT TO WORK! Tell Bill Cllalon no1 u) forre Arkanru j workem (s pay union dua

.. 1) Cdl1(800) 325-7892. or ! 2) Ma11 a contributlao payable IO j hXlWC. 8001 Brsddock Road. ; rtsoq Springfield. VA 2.2160, ! i.. . i

Emergency itixen Action Re

From:

To :

Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite SO0 Springfield, Virginia 22160

Reed : With Bill Clinton vowing to destroy Right to Work, and with Big Labor on the verge of buying a lock grip on the U.S. Senate, I want to help turn the heat all the wav up on Governor Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. I have: - Called Governor Bill Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate.

- Enclosed a contribution to pay for the ads you are already running in newspapers across the nation: - $1,000 __ $500 __ $200 - $100

__ $25 - Other ($ )

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC. 1.. .

-k -k Committee'sWashineton D.C. Headquarters is located at ow nation's ad- tal at Boo1 Braddock R oad. Suite 50 Suringfield. VA 22160 Terne (800) 32578 92. kusethq 1RS has recornized NRTWC as tax exemut under IRC Sec 501(c)(4), which Permits unlimited lobbvina pntributions are not tax deductible as charitable contributions. I a COALITION OF EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYERS 1 I REED uRSON PI.S~OCOI

October 27, 1992 Dear Arizona Member: Right to Work is in deep trouble. Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip over the U.S. Senate. If Organized Labor takes control over both the White House and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in jeopardy -- including your own. Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'll work to repeal Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work laws. 1 have taken emergency action to alert Arizona citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify your Right to Work law. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support for cornpulsary unionism. Enclosed, please find a copy of an advertisement I am sending to newspapers throughout Arizona. Similar versicns are running in newspapers in Right to Work states across the country. I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads not only in Arizona, but also in other Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed more than $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending power grab.

WASHINGTON DC HEADOUARTERS 8001 BRADDOCK ROAD. SUITE 500 e SPRINGFIELD. VIRGINIA 22160 e TEL 1703i 321-9820

"Amerrcans musl have Ihe righl but nor De ComPelled to loin labw UnIOnS"

~~~ ~ ~ ~ But I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support compulsory unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to ioin a union to feed his or her family. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they're still listening.

Please, please, call Governor Clinton IMMEDIATELY at 1 (800) 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is morally wrong and economically disastrous for Arizona. And if you can, please send a special contribution today to help us cover the a.dditiona1 cost of this last-minute advertising blitz. Arizona's Right to Work law may depend on it. Sincerely,

P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14(b) of the Tsrft- Hartley Act, thousands of Arizona jobs will be lost. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ad. Bill Clinton Wants to Force You to Pay Union wok lhc magic words unim officials so want IOhru: "I suppat rcpl oiScuion 14@j ofrhc TaRHlnlcy Act." Dues to Work in ArhM Seuim 14@) aulaizu SUP lcgi~la~~~loeruct Right lo As Gmana. Bill Clintm bagged lboln his SUB'SRight to Wdhws. RcpllofSaclim 14@) wddre& 111 21 s&P W~Lwwllunne~upbrd~butineswrtoI\r~. Right LO Work laws - including Mmona'r. In ha. Arkuuu' Right lo Wdr law (which rUwr wcvtrri u, Unless you chrngs BIU Clinwk mind, he and a new Big In chmv whuher u noL pylmim dues) enabled Bill Clinrm Lba connoiled Senale may rcpwl ywRighl to Wdr Lw toboraIhuhis .ye"rdslain rk mnyin gmwh ofnew md faccvnr of Ihwwdr of Arizona workers u, pay union pba . .. mddh in income inaclr" dues CT be fd.Thwrondr @job1 would be lo~rformec 'Whatever Y'all Want': Clinton Trades Right Union Control over the White Houseand to Work for Big Labor Support Congress = Forced Unionism But to win Ihc suw of Organucd LaWs massive UNLESS ~auwBILL CLINTON h~outiuON politiirol mrchiie (which dumps OYU S350 millim into RIGKT TO WORK LVOIV.union power brokers may k able fcdml elestims uch yurl. Bill Clintm now pomiwr the ~plsrjus~aboutmyI~w~~~ywultinrhefust~00&yso~~ AFJXIO hc'U bemy his own sue -md yaor -by Clinlon Admmisaa~ion. rrputiag 21 SUB Right w Work laws. dI Right now is Ihc bat time. Now's when lepoliticians are nil1 lirvning LO YOU. Give 'an IS earful.

! Tell Dill Cllntoo not 10 force Ariwna i workcn to ps) union duez 1 '(b*.draN.cmai.pid&.i?h*ohnwy I SOnulbutlou from Atlzrm momters 01 ua

To blp pmw AJurm.', Ki* u) WDIt hr. ! *hyfhmdlDis~OlfOfWm I kfmml!Qn Cop" 01 UZ ClilOU~' : R1~u)Wmt~taSwcy'l,?b: From:

TO:

Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite 500 Springfield, Virginia 22160

Reed : With Bill Clinton vowing to destroy Right to Work, and with Big Labor on the verge of buying a lock grip on the U.S. Senate, I want to helg turn the heat all the way up on Governor Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. I have: - Called Governor Bill Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. - Enclosed a contribution to pay for the ads you are already running in newspapers across the nation:

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC. The National Rwht to Work Committee's Wnshlnnton DC Headquarters IS located at our nihon-

131 at EO1 Braddoc~~~~ Road.~~ Sute ~ 500 Svnnefield. VA 22160 Televhone (80)32 5-7892 BCCJUS~ k ~ as IRS has mcoenized NRWC B hx exemvt undm contributions are not hr deductible as charitable contributions. Ihtionel Right To os& Committee

A COALITION OF EWLOY€ES AND EMPLOYERS

REED URSON. Piemden1

October 27, 1992 Dear Florida Member: Right to Work is in deep trouble. Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip over the U.S. Senate. If Organized Labor takes control over bnth the White House and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in jeopardy -- including your own. Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'll work to repeal Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work laws. I have taken emergency action ti) alert Florida citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify your Right to Work law. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support for compulsory unionism. Enclosed, please find a copy of an advertisement I am sending to newspapers throughout Florida. Similar versions are running in newspapers in Right to Work states across the country. I am doing everything 3 can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to iorce every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads not only in Florida, but also in other Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Conunittee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed more than $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending power grab.

WASHINGTON DC. HEADOUAATERS BOO1 BRADDOCK ROAD, SUITE 500 * SPRINGFIELD. VIRGINIA 22160 TEL (7031 321-9820 "Americans must have the righf but nor be compelled to join labor unions"

~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ -~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ But I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support compulsory unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to ioin a union to feed his or her familv. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they're still listening.

Please, please, call Governor Clinton IMMEDIATELY at 1 (8001 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism 1s morally wrong and economically disastrous €or Florida. And if you car., please send a special contribution today to help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising blitz. Florida's Right to Work law may depend on it. Sincerely,

P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft- Hartley Act, thousands of Florida jobs will be lost. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ad. Bill Clinton Wants to Force You to Pay Union WMI: !he rnrgic wmdr uniw oificirls so want lo hex “I suppat reprl of Seuion 14(b) of the Tafl-Hmlcy Act.” Dues to Work in Florida Sravm la(b) auIhhaizea sute legirliturcr toenaci Right to As Govma. Bill Clirucn hrgaed ibau his IUIC’SRight ID Work laws. Rcpeil of Section 14(b) wwld repal all 21 YIV: Wd1.w ID lure new pbr and small hrrinesws ID ,bk.nur. Right 10 Work laws - including Roridr’r. In iau. Nnnss’ RightloWds law (which ailawswortrri ID Unlcrr ywchange Dill Clinm’r mmd. he and a new Big ch- whether a nol w pyuniin dudcnibled Bill Clinm Labconsolled Smaa may rqxx1 yow Right ID Work law robtuh~thiswrlc”r~rIscmIhf~uym~rou~dnew and f- lwls of houran& of 19onda wukcrs ID pyUnlcm pbs. , . and 4h in ineomc ulourc.” dues OT be (ired. Thouad cfjobr vwld h Ioiljorrw ‘Whatever Y’all Want’: Clinton Trade Right Union Control over lhe White Moue and to Work for Big hbor Support Congress = Forced Unionism But to win the suwai Orgnnaed Liba’r massiw U?~ESSYOU nw BEL CLI~ONAROUND ON plitiol machine (which dmps ovcrS350 rnillicm inlo RIGHT TO WORK ,VOW, unicm power brokers may be dblc federal elccticns each yur). Bill Clintm now pomiwr the io pass just ~tmtany law hey want in Lc Erst 1W days 01a AFL-CIOhe’ll bemy his own SUE - and yws- by Clinton Adminissation. repling dl 21 SUERight to Work laws. Right now is thc beit time. Now’s whcn Ihe polilicianr In his cmpign bd.Puling Pcoplr First. Bill Clinm UE still listening to YOU. Give ‘em m urful.

j I) Call I (800) 3ZS7892 or mergency citizen ction Re

TO : Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite 500 Springfield, Virginia 22160

Reed : With Bill Clinton vowing to destroy Right to Work, and with Big Labor on the verge of buying a lock grip on the U.S. Senate, I want to help turn the heat all the way up on Governor Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. I have: - Called Governor Bill Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. __ Enclosed a contribution to pay for the ads you are already running in newspapers across the nation: __ $1,000 - $500 - $200 - $100

- $25 - Other ($ 1

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC. 7he National Rivht to Work Committee's Washinzton D.C. Headauarters is located at our nation's ad- tal at 8001 Braddcxk Road. Suite 500 Suueld.VA 22160 Tow(800) 3257692. Because the IRS has recognized NRTWC as tax exernDt under IRC set 501(c)(4). which Dermils unlimited Iobbvk contributions are not tax deductible as charitable contributions, Ii or

A COALITION OF EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYERS

REED URSON, P,rf,d#nl

October 27, 1992 Dear Iowa Member: Right to Work is in deep trouble. Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip over the U.S. Senate. If Organized Labor takes control over both the White House and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the Country is in jeopardy -- including your own. Bill Clinton has promised &he AFL-CIO he‘ll work to repeal Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work laws. I have taken emergency action to alert Iowa citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify your Right to Work law. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support for compulsory unionism. Enclosed, please find a copy of an advertisement I am sending to newspapers throughout Iowa. Similar versions are running in newspapers in Right to Work states across the country. I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads not only in Iowa, but also in other Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee’s financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed more than $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor’s impending power grab.

WASHINGTON D C HEADOUARTERS. 8001 BAADOOCK ROAD. SUITE 500 e SPRINGFIELD. VIRGINIA 22160. TEL 17031 321-9820 “Americans must have rhe right but not be COrnQeiied lo loin labor unions”

-- ~ ~__ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ I I 1 IA i i 1 I I I I But I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support compulsory unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to join a union to feed his or her familv. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they're still listening.

Please, piease, call Governor Clinton IMi4EEIA'TELY at 1 (8GG) 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is morally wrong and economically disastrous for Iowa. And if you can, please send a special contribution today to help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising blitz. Iowa's Right to Work law may depend on it. Sincerelv.

P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft- Hartley Act, thousands of Iowa jobs will be lost. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ad. F 192-1993?

ii Cd1 Governor Bill Clinton at 1(800)325-9992

3 e

A Warning lo Iowa Wori;ers, Small Businmes, Taxpapnand Conslrmrrsfmm IheNalionaI Right lo Work Committee

rt:ntnn tn in D.," irninn WOE masic wwds oificirlr so van1 IO hcac "I nmY." bLIIIW.. won*=.."..la 6". rnrw".LC vn...".A 1". "J VI..".. he I ~~ union wppircpA ai Seuicn 14(b) of Ihc Tdr-Hdcy AcL'. Dues to Work in Iowa Scuim 14(b) authffizes stav. legishnucs to CMU Right 10 Ar Govcma. Bill CLm bagged rbau his sua's Ri@l LD Wak laws. Re+ of Secucn 14(b) vwld =pal JI 21 sak Righl lo Work !awl - including Iowa's.

wt-s luhis sllle"m

'Whatever Y 'all Want': Clinton Trades Right Union Control over the White House and ~LI Work for Big Labor Support Congress- = Forced Unionism Bur LO win leNW of OIganiUd Lab's massive UNLESS YOU TL?uy BILL CLINTON AROUND ON political machbc (which dumps over 5350 million inlo RIGHT TU WORK NOW, union power brokers may be able feddelscrims a& year), Bill Clintm ilow promisees the w pass just about my lay. lhcy want in hc furt 100 days of a AFL.CI0 he'U kayhis omstltc -and y- -by Clinton Adminirmtion. ~&ing 111 21 sw Righl Wok laws. Lo Right now is lhc hst time. Now's wibm the politicians Ia hb UmpigF. bdr. Purring People First. BiU Clinm are $till 1i;tCning IOYOU. Give 'mUI orful.

HELP SAVE IOWA'S RIGHT TO WORK!

s! I) CAI 1 @LW 3257892. or 2) Mail a contribution payable 10 NRTWC, 8W1 Brnddock Road, WO.Springfleld. VA ZtlW. (cmmhnm, rn'w' Wr-wci From:

TO : Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite 500 Springfield, Virginia 22160

Reed : With Bill Clinton vowing to destroy Right to Work, and with Big Labor on the verge of buying a lock grip on the U.S. Senate, I want to help turn the heat all the way UQ on Governor Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate-. I have: - Called Governor Bill Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. __ Enclosed a contribution to pay €or \ the ads you are already running in newspapers across the nation:

__ $1,000 __ $500 _. $200 - $100

__ $25 - Other ($ )

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC. I’ I

The National Ripht to Work Committee’s Washineton D.C. Headauarters Is located at OUT nation’s cam- laI&&W&dh&eMIA221 M Teleuhone (RM) 325-7892, kauwthe __ ~~~~~~ ~. ~ ~~ ~ IR5 has recomized NRWC as tax exemot under IRCSec 501(c)(4). which uermits unlimited lobbying, contributions are not tax deductible as cha~itablecontributions. 1 he itte

A COALITION OF EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYERS

REED VIRSON. Pteslaam

October 27, 1992 Dear Member: Right to Work is in deep trouble. Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip over the U.S. Senate. If Organized Labor takes control over both the White House and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in jeopardy -- including your own. Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'll work to repeal Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section .. .. . i..i 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work 'U laws. I have taken emergency action to alert Kansas citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify your Right to Work law. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton tQ back away from his support for compulsory unionism. Enclosed, please find a copy of an advertisement I am sending to newspapers throughout Kansas. Similar versions are running in newspapers in Right to Work states across the country. I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads not only in Kansas, but also in other Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed more than $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending power grab.

WASHINGTON D C HEADOUARTERS 8001 BRADDOCK ROAD SUITE 500 e SPRINGFIELD VIRGINIA 22160 * TEL 17031 321-9620 "Amerxans must have Ihe rrghl bur nc1 De cOmDelled 10 loin labor unions" But I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support compulsory unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to ioin a union to feed his or her familv. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they're still listening.

Please, please, call Governor Clinton IMMEDIATELY at 1 (800) 325-9992 and tell him his support fsr compulsory unionism is morally wrong and economically disastrous for Kansas. And if you can, please send a special contribution today to help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising blitz. Kansas' Right to Work law may depend on it. Sincerely,

P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft- Hartley Act, thousands of Kansas jobs will be lost. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ad.

From:

TO :

Reed Larson, President National Right ta Work Committee 8001 Braddeck Road, Suite 500 Springfield, Virginia 22160

Reed : With Bill Clinton vowing to destroy Right to Work, and with Big Labor on the verge of buying a lock grip on the U.S. Senate, I want to help turn the heat all the wav up on Governor Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. I have:

_I Call.ed Governor Bill Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. - Enclosed a. contribution to pay for the ads you are already running in newspapers across the nation: __ $1.000 __ $500 __ $200 __ $100 - $25 __ Other ($ \

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC. The Nahonal fL&t to Work Committee's Washindon DC Ue;ldauxters LS located at ow nation's uPi. tal at 8001 Braddock Road. 5u1te500 Sonneh?Id, VA 22160 Tewone (ROO) 325-7892. kau' the Eharccoenued NRTWC IPX exempt undcr 1RC Sec SO1 lcM4). which ~cmr1tsunlimited lobbving conmbuaons are not tax deducnble;lF chantable contnbiihonj. ational Right ?o Work Committee I j A COALITION OF EMPLOYEES AND TMPLOYERS i REED LARSON. Pisrdaol

October 27, 1992 Dear Louisiana Member: Right to Work is in deep trouble. Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completeiy to the union bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip over the U.S. Senate. If Organized Labor takes control over both the White House and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in jeopardy -- including your own. Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'll work to repeal Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section .-.. . i,i 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work 'i 'i , .-i i.; laws. I have taken emergency action tu alert Louisiana citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify your Right to Work law. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support for compulsory unionism. Enclosed, please find a copy of an advertisement I am sending to newspapers throughout Louisiana. Similar versions are running in newspapers in Right to Work states across the country. I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed ts force every US. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads not only in Louisiana, but also in other Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed more than $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending power grab.

WASHINGTON D C HEADOUARTERS. 8001 BRADDOCK ROAD. SUITE 500 0 SPRINGFIELD. VIRGINIA 22160 TEL I7031 321-9820 "Amerrcans musf have Ihe righl buI not be cornDelleU to foin labof un1on.s'' -~~ ~~ ~~ ~- But I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support compulsory unionism €eel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to join a union to feed his or her familv. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they're still listening. Please, please, call Governor Clinton IMMEDIATELY at 1 (800) 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism 1s morally wrong and economically disastrous for Louisiana. And if you can, please send a special contribution today to help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising blitz. Louisiana's Right to Work law may depend on it. Sincerely,

P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft- Hartley Act, thousands of Louisiana jobs will be lost. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ad. I C' I.

isia

' ...... ,-:...... s : -1

;--., ....~... .., :. i.-, :>II:

...~,... -.. i-1

HELP SAVE LOUISIISIAVA'S RlGHTKI WORK!

1) Cdl 1 iSW 315784 or From:

TO :

Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite 500 Springfield, Virainia 22160

Reed : Xith Biil Ciincon vowing to destroy Right to Work, and with Big Labor an the verge of buying a lock grip on the U.S. Senate, I want to helD turn the heat all the wav up on Governor Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. I have: - Called Governor Bill Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. - Enclosed a contribution to pay for the ads you are already running in newspapers across the nation:

__ $1,000 __ $500 __ $200 - $100

- $25 __ Other ($ )

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC. The National Riht to Work Cornrnittee’r.Washineton D.C. Headmartem is located ot our nation’s upi- tal at 8co1 Brad dock Road. Suite 5W Sprinefield. VA 22160 TeleDhon e (800) 325-7892. Because the IRS has recorrnized NR’IWI: as tax exernut under IRC Sec 501(c)(4), which Dermits unfirnitedlobhving. cc A COALITION OF EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYERS

REED URSON. Presm!oI

October 27, 1992 Dear Mississippi Member: Right to Work is in deep trouble. Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip over the U.S. Senate. If Organized Labor takes control over boch the Whice House and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in jeopardy -- including your own. Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'll work to repeal Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section 14(bl authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work laws. I have taken emergency action to alert Mississippi citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify your Right to Work law. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support for compulsory unionism. Enclosed, please find a copy of an advertisement I am sending to newspapers throughout Mississippi. Similar versions are running in newspapers in Right to Work states across the country. I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues LO get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads not only in Mississippi, but also in other Right to Work states?

I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work . Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed more than $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending power grab.

WASHINGTON DC HEADQUARTERS 8001 BRADDOCK ROAD. SUITE 500 e SPRINGFIELD VIRGINIA 22160 TEL 17031 321-9820

"Amerrcans must have rhe righl but nor be compe!!ed IO ;om labor unions" But I need your additional supporr. right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support compulsory unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to join a union to feed his or her family. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they're still listening. Please, please, call Governor Clinton IMMEDIATELY at 1 (800) 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is morally wrong and economically disastrous for Mississippi. And if you can, please send a special contribution today to help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising blitz. Mississippi's Right to Work law may depend on it.

P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft- Hartley Act. thousands of Mississippi jobs will be lost. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ad. 5utto~Ihc~ppcnafOrginLcd~~'smarrivt UNLESSYOUTllRNBILLCLIPrrONARO'JNDON poliuul machine (which dumps over S3SO millioa in10 RlGHr TO WORK NOW. union power brokers msy be able fedml cktims etch year). Bill Clinzm now pOmiXS rhe w pa" just about my low bey WUI in herust 100 days of a AFLClO he'll baray his own SUP-- md YM -by CLinua Adminisnilion repding all 21 SUBRight Worlr Lur. to Right now is lebest limr Now's when leplilicians h his campaign W. PuffingPeople Fwrf. Bill Clinun art still listening 10 YOU. Give 'man &I.

phye 1) Call I@W) 3257892, or 2) Mail n conlrlbutloo papblc to NRTWC. 8WI Braddock Rond, #540, Springfldd. VA 221a ,cnr.b-uoa"~lur) From:

To: Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite 500 Springfield, Virginia 22160

Reed : With Bill Clinton vowing to destroy Right to Work, and with Big Labor on the verge of buying a lock grip on the U.S. Senate, I want to help turn the heat all the wav up on Governor Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. I have: - Called Governor Bill Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. __ Enclosed a contribution to pay €or the ads you are already running in newspapers across the nation: - $1,000 - $500 - $200 __ $100

__ $25 __ Other ($ 1

Please make checks payable and return to: MRTVVC. The National Ri&t to Work Commiltce's Waqhinmon DC. Headsumen is located at our nation's cwi- tal a: WI Br addock Road. Suite 500 0 ~DnnRfIdd~u re IRS has rrcoenwd NRTWC hxexcmot under IRC Sec 501(c)(4). which errmils unlimited lobbvinr: contributions JW not fax deductible as charitable rontnbuhonn. A COALITION OF EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYERS

!I REED LARSON. Preitdml

October 27, 1992 Dear Nebraska Member:

i ", si.. Right to Work is in deep trouble. ._..f ?! 5.'Ti Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union ii , i :L: basses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip over the U.S. Senate. *- \ I .. . 17: ~ .~. If Organized Labor takes control over both the White House and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in jeopardy -- including your own.

L* ?=I.... Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'll work to repeal Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section ii 14(b) authorizes s:ate legislatures to enact state Right to Work ILI._ i'.1 laws. . _I.. I have taken emergency action to alert Nebraska citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify your Right to Work law. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support for compulsory unionism. Enclosed, please find a copy of an advertisement I am sending to newspapers throughout Nebraska. Similar versions are running in newspapers in Right to work states across the country. I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads not only in Nebraska, but also in other Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed more than $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending power grab.

WASHINGTON 0 C HEADOUARTERS 8001 BRADDOCK ROAD SUITE 500 0 SPRINGFIELD VIRGINIA 22160. TEL 1703)321.9820 "Amercans musr have fhe rrghl bul nor be compelled lo lorn labor untons"

~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~ But I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support compulsory unionism feel Che ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to ioin a union to feed his or her family. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they're still listening. Please, please, call Governor Clinton IMMEDIATELY at 1 (800) 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is morally wrong and economically disastrous for Nebraska. And if you can, please send a special contribution today to help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising blitz. Nebraska's Right to Work law may depend on it.

Ic;nPmYDly,------

P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14(b) of the Tafc- Hartley Act, thousands of Nebraska jobs will be lost. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspager ad. A Warning to Nebraska Workew Smlli ausinesq Taxpayers and Consumers from the Nalional Right lo Wo* Cornmiltee

Bill Clinton 'wants to Force You to Pay Union wae thc magic wards ltnim ofliciali IO WML to hear: 'I suppimpul ofSedon 14(b) of LeTdt-Hnrtley AcL" Dues to Work in Nebmka Smim Id@) auhksuu bgirlarurrs w auaRighrlo As Goqcma. 89 Qiolm hggdlbun his sw'a Riel 10 WdIws Rep4 of ktim 14%) wuarld rep1 all 21 Iulc PlhlrhWUlhmIlWj&dodhlSi5=WWu,Arkro?U RigBtW Work laws- including Neharb'r. lo fm%t#msd Righ11O wat: law (Wtlich ~swkr,k? Unksyouchroge BillClinuxl'smind. hemdducwBig rbme &lca srbahacrm w pylmicaducr) cnrbled Bill L&a cmmU.4 Srmlc may repeal ymRight U) Wak law mbDLs1bhia swc '& lain tk amtry in pod dnew Md face ms of hcwmdr of Nchhwaken w pyuaim pba.. .d4lhin inc.culc bsr" dues a be fdThouondr djdu w4bm larr fmmz 'Whatever Y'all Want': Clinton Trades Right Union Control over the white Mowe and to Work for Big Labor Support Unionh ConmaI = Forced Bu w ria he ~olOrg&aimiLdnr'smauive UNLESS YOU BILL CllNTQN AROUM) ON poliiul muhii (which dumps over $350 dlim ion RIGHT TO WORK NOW.tmim power tmkm may be able I& d&ms uch year), Bill Clinua now pmniwr the wpp.ujw~iboutmyIawthcyw~tintheTmt1CQdayiota Ana0 be'U bemy his owmu - Md ycun -by Chua Admiiunlioe "pulmg all 21 sum RighI w work laws. Righi now is tbe bat lime Now's when tho polilicios In his umpiga bc& Pvning Ptoplr Firrr. Bill Clem arc SUI lisming w YOU. Give 'cm M csrfvL

.. TDbb Q.I&um Wlrt hr. i (* . ,.

From:

To : Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 araddock Road, Suite 500 Springfield, Virginia 22160 Reed: With Bill Clinton vowing to destroy Right to Work, and with Big Labor on the verge of buying a lock grip on the U.S. Senate, I want to help turn the heat all the wav UD on Governor Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. I have:

I_ Called Governor Bill Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. - Enclosed a contribution to pay for the ads you are already running in newspapers across the nati-on: - $1,000 __ $500 - $200 __ $100

I_ $25 __ Other ($ )

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC. nn tal at Boo1 Rrsddock Road. Stale 333 SD~ield. VA 22160 Telephone (900) 32L7fl42 &c;lusc the IRS has recomized NRTWC as tax exempt under IRC Sec 501(c)(4). which Dennits unlimited lobbving. (onmbl!honsarecbuhons ationat light To Work Committee

A COALITION OF EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYERS i October 27, 1992 1 Dear North Dakota Member: Right to Work is in deep trouble. 1 ..i'.,-.. j ~:7j 1 Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union i: i: bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip over ._.!!: .. the U.S. Senate.

ir , $ -. Organized Labor takes control over both the White House ._~ If .~.! i, and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in i.?

--...~. ._.- .. Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'll work to repeal -.jj . Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work .. >..! 3i-l laws. I have taken emergency action to alert North Dakota citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify your Right to Work law. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support for compulsory unionism. Enclosed, please find a copy of an advertisement I am sending to newspapers throughout North Dakota. Similar versions are running in newspapers in Right to Work states across the country. I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads not only in North Dakota, but also in other Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed more than $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending power grab.

WASSINGTON DC HEADOUARTERS 8001 BRADDOCK ROAD SUITE 500. SPRlNGFlEL,D VIRGINIA 22160 TEL 17031 321-9620 "Amer!cans must have Ihe fight but nor be compelled to join labor UnlDnS"

~ ~~ ~ I. I.

But I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support compul.sory unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to ioin a union to feed his or her familv.

. .I -; We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they're still listening.

?le2se, please, call Gover-c?r Cliriton IMMEDIATELY at 1 (800) 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is morally wrong and economically disastrous for North Dakota. And if you can, please send a special contribution today to help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising blitz. North Dakota's Right to Work law may depend on it.

P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft- Hartley Act, thousands of North Dakota jobs will be lost. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ad. But I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support compulsory unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to join a union to feed his or her familv. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they're still listening. Please, please, call Governor Clinton IMMEDIATELY at 1 (800) 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is morally wrong and economically disastrous for South Dakota. And if you can, please send a special contribution today to help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising blitz. South Dakota's Right to Work law may depend on it. Sincere1y,

P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft- Hartley Act, thousands of South Dakota jobs will be lost. ?lease send a special contribution today to heip pay for running the attached newspaper ad. I i ittee 1 A COALITIQPI OF EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYERS

~ REED LARSON. Ptefmeor

I I October 27, 1992 I Dear Tennessee Member: ! I f.1 Right to Work is in deep trouble. , _= 1

~ _-Yf, Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union cd.. bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip over the U.S. Senate. i; i...

rr,SA:-~ If Organized Labor takes control over both the white House t5=i and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in J jeopardy -- including your own.

z.3 a7=.. . Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'll work to repeal Section 14(b) of the Taft-Xartley Act. AS you know, Section '=_ 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work ;..I--. laws. I have taken emergency action to alert Tennessee citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify your Right to Work law. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support for compulsory unionism. Enclosed, please find a copy of an advertisement I am sending to newspapers throughout Tennessee. Similar versions are running in newspapers in Right to Work states across the country. I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clintor. has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000. $100 or $25 to help us cover th2 costs of running these ads not only in Tennessee, but also in other Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed more than $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending power grab.

WASHINGTON D C HEADQUARTERS 8001 BRADDOCK ROAD. SUITE 500 SPRINGFIELD. VIRGINIA 22160 * TEL (7031321-9820 "Ameficans must have rhe righl bur nor be cornDeiled lo join labor unions"

~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~ - ~- ,’ . ..* . TN

But I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support compulsory unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to join a union to feed his or her familv. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they’re Still listening.

Please, piease, call Governor Clinton IMMEDIATELY at 1 (300) 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is morally wrong and economically disastrous for Tennessee. And if you can, please send a special contribution today to help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising blitz. Tennessee’s Right to Work law may depend on it. Sincerelv.

P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft- Hartley Act, thousands of Tennessee jobs will be lost. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ad. BiU Clinton Wants to Force You to Pay Union 'MW lemagic wads unim ailicinls Y) "."I w hw. 'I suppat re@ of Section Iqb) of Ihe Tafl-Hdey ACL" Dues to Work io Tennessee Seaion 14b) auhabu su~IegisLnverro cmuRigh11o As hema: Bill CXmm hgsd pban hi a'sRight w Wuk law% Repeal of SDC~14@) wddrcpl d121 p1m Wak law LO hmnew pbr and mall twinuxa LO Artannur. Right to Work laws - including TCMUW'S. h La Ahnsas' Ri@tw Wuk La, (which daws Mrtrrr LO Udcn ymchlngc Bill Clinm's mind. hc and a new Big cboorc *&RUM WOpy eC-0 duu) unb!ed Bill flblon LsbIcmmlltd Smlu may -1 yarr Right lo Wd1.v w blhuhir si&"& lu in the camuy ia gmMh dnew md faMI of lhwuods of Tmeru+ wmkm w pyunim jobr .. . vld4Ih in inmme incrux- dues a be Ti. Thwnndr djobs rauld br imc fornrr. 'Whatever Y'all Want': Clinton Trades Right Union Control over the White House and to Work for Big bbor Support Congress = Forced Unionism BuLO win Ihc mpp" of 0rg.nbed Wsmassive UNESS YOU TUXW BIU. CLINTON AXOUNJ ON polkiol machim (which dumps over S3.50 milhinlo RIGHT 70WORX NOW. unim prer hkmmny be able fcdenl clcctans uch yor). Bill Clwm now pmivs &he w psl jus .b"lmy 1.w ley Waul in hefm1 IM) days of a An430 he'll bemy his own sum - md yam- by Clinm Adminirmtioa. rcpJing 9 21 sure Right to Work laws. Right MW is the beu time Now's when hepolil*iuu h hu umplign bx&. f'vlring Pcopk First. Bill Clinm arc SUIlistming w YOU. Give *eman urful.

RIGHTTO WORK! TCIIBIII ciiaion DOI w rarco 0 Tcnocooc rorkmw pay union dum. I ill c

.

J From :

To: Reed Larson, President Naticml Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite 500 SpriEgfield, Virginia 22160

Reed : With Bill Clinton vowing to destroy Right to Work, and with Big Labor on the verge of buying a lock grip on the U.S. Senate, I want to help turn the heat all the wav up on Governor Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. I have: __ Called Governor Bill Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. - Enclosed a contribution to pay for the ads you are already running in newspapers across the nation: - $1,000 __ $500 - $200 - $100

- $25 __ Other ($ )

Please make checks payable and return to: NR34C. i' .. i .,

The National Right to Work Committee's Washineon D.C. Headquarters is located at our nationk- !ai: at 80 IRS has recoenized NRTWC ,m tax exempt under IRC Sec SOI(d(4). which permits unlimited lobbving, contributions are not hxdeductible as charitable contributions. Emergency Citizen

TO :

Reed Larson, President National F.ight to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite 500 Springfield, Virginia 22160

Reed : With Bill Clinton vowing to destroy Right to Work, and with Rig Labor on the verge of buying a lock qrip on the U.S. Senate, I want to help turn the heat all the wav up on Governor Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. I have: - Called Governor Bill Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. __ Enclosed a contribution to pay for the ads you are already running in newspapers across the nation:

__ $1.000 __ $500 __ $200 __ $100

- $25 __ Other ($ )

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC.

Emergenc citizen Action

From:

To :

Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite 500 Springfield, Virginia 22160

Reed : With Bill Clinton vowing to destroy Right to Work, and with Big Labor on the verge of buying a lock grip on the U.S. Senate, I want to help turn the heat all the wav up on Governor Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. I have: __ Called Governor Bill Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate.

__ Enclosed a contribution to pay for the ads you are already running in newspapers across the nation:

- $1,000 __ $500 __ $200 - $100

- $25 __ Other ($ 1

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC. The National fhht to Work Committee's Washinnton D.C. Headquarters is located at Our notion's Uti- tal at 8001 6raddock Road. Suite 500 0 Snrinnfie&.-~A 22160 * Tebkne (800) 325-7692. Rwause & IRS hsrrcognized - NRnVC JS bxexempt under IRC Sec 501(c)(4). whtch permits unlimtted lobbving, ccuhon9 National light To Work Committee I A COALfTtON OF EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYERS

October 27, 1992 Dear South Dakota Member: Right to Work is in deep trouble. Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip over the U.S. Senate. ..1 -...... -..- .. If Organized Labor takes control over both the White House ...... $'i.. . and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in jeopardy -- including your own. Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'll work to repeal Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section .~..... ld(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work ~~. laws. .::, .. I have taken emergency action to alert South Dakota citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify your Right to Work law. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support €or compulsory unionism. Enclosed, please find a copy of an advertisement I am sending to newspapers throughout South Dakota. Similar versions are running in newspapers in Right to Work states aciross the country. I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads not only in South Dakota, but also in other Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed more than $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending power grab.

WASHINGTON DC HEAOQUARTERS. 8001 BAADDOCK ROAO SUITE 500. SPRINGFIELD. WlRGlNJA 22160 * TEL 1703; 321-9820 "Americans musl have the right bul nor be comQelled lo loin labor Unions"

~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ___- ~ ~~ ~ Call Governor Bill Clinton at I (800) 325-9992

W?

A Warning lo South Dakota Workers, Smdl BusinwqTaxpaycrs and Consumers frnm IheYationaI Right lo Work Committee

wae the magic wads unim officials IO wan1 lo he= "I ...^ NO~Lrcasl of Seuion 14W of the Tafl-Hdcv Act."

ant': Clinton 'Ikades Right Union Control over the White House and Work for BiLaboh Support Congress = Forced Unionism Bur U, win he suppar of Orgmk,ed Wsmassive Uh'LEiS YOU naU BILL CLINTON AROUND ON polilhl machine (which dumps over $350 millim inlo RlGKT To WORK NOW, unim Ferbmken may k able fcdcnl elections uch yur), Bill Clinira now pomiws the lo piis just abut my law they want in the lirri 100 days af a AFL-CIO he'll buny his omsmc -and ynos -by Clintm Adminism?ion. quhgdI 21 suo Right 10 Wok laws. Right now is he bat timr Now's when the pcliticians In his cmpign bxk. Pwfing People NwBill Oinm are still lirlcning w YOU. Give 'cm an earful.

u- HELP SAVE SOU" DAKOTA'S RIGHTTO WORK!

d

I) Cdl 1 @W) 3L5-789l. or 1) Mail s canlributlon payable ID NRTWC. 8001 Brzddock Road. 8500, Springfield. VA 22160. (Cmdnbnea Milo( u. -2-1 lbe National Rraht to Work Cornmrttee'~Wa5hurRlon DC Headquarters e located at our narion's QDI- tal at 801 Rraddock R oad. Sulte jM) SDnnp.ii&. VA 22lM) Tcleohone (800)32 5-7692 Ekco use the IRS has rccomized NRTWC as tax exemDt under IRC Sec jOI(d(4). which wnnrts unlimrlcd lobbvlne conrnbuhons arc not tax drductible35 chonlahlecontnbutroni I A COALITION OF EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYERS

REED UASON. Prrsicenr

October 27, 1092 1 Dear Texas Member:

&'I Right t3 Wsrk is in deep trouble.

z >. ..- Governor Bill Clinton has sold out ccmpletely to the union

iii Y I bosses. And Orcanizeci Labar seems poised to buy a lock grip Over the U.S. Senate. If Organized Labor takes control over both the White House and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in jeopardy -- including your own. Bill Clintor, has promised the AFL-CIO he'li work to repeal Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartiey Act. As you know, Section 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work laws. I have taken emergency action to alert Texas citizens that Governor Clintor. intends to nullify your Right to Work law. 1 am doing all I caE to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his suppcrt for compulsory unionism. Enclosed, please find a copy of an advertisement I am sending to newspapers throughout Texas. Similar versions are running in newspapers in Richt to Work states across the country. I am doing everything I can to alert the public that GoverEor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keop a job in America. But I need your help.

Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads not only in Texas, but also in other Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed more than $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending power grab. T t

au: i need yocr addicional support richt away to cover the c sts of chase ads. Pruder.ce will Eat allow me to go any further into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support ccmpulsory unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be fcrced to join a union to feed his or her familv. We mus: turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Righc to Work, NOW, whiie they're still listening.

Please, please, call Governor Clinton Ik%EDiZ.TELY at 1 (800) 325-9992 and tell hin his support for compulsory unionism is morally wrong and economically disastrous for Texas. Ar.d if you caz, please send a special contribution today to help us caver the additional cost of this lasc-minnte advertising blitz. Texas' Kipht to Work law may deFend on i:.

P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft- Hartley Act, thousands of Texas jobs will be lost. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ad. I

i

~ I

1;

s

i.

Call Governor Blll Cllnton nt 1 (800)325-9992

9

A Warnine IO Texas Workers. Small Business. Tuoaven and Conrumen lrom the National Right lo Work Committee

Bill Clinton Wants to Force You ta Dues to Work in Texas I xhtthi ubt law lo hm new+ and SML h ha ma’Right lo wair I*” cboae wh&lerUMx lo pay urn8 lo bun IDuhls rue ‘iankr lrcm B *. . . llld 41b u1 mcunc LDCR.%” Wbatever Y’aU Want’: C1 inton Trade Rght Union Control over the White House and Work for Big Labor Support Congress = Forced Unionism Bur~rvinIhc~pponotDrglnhed~ba’,rniriive UNLESS rou TJRNBIU. CLINTON AROUND ON plitiul machine (which dumps OVCT S350 million mm RIGHTTO WORKNOW.union pwakokersm8yberblc fcdml claGms uch year). Bill Clinim now pomiwr the tops~jui~bou~anyl~wthey wlntio hefirst 1M)daysofa AFL-CIO he’ll kmyhis own sue - and yam- by Clint00 A4minishuoa reprlmg 21 sate Right lo Work 1~’~s. dI Right now is the brrt time. Now’s whm the politicians h hb urnpip bodr. Pmhg Ptoplr F”3f. Bill Clinim ut SUI ~islmingIO You. Givc ‘em m &I.

a ency Gitize ction Re

TO :

Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee

? 8001 Braddock Road, Suice 500 Springfield, Virginia 22160

Reed : With Bill Clinton vowing to destroy Right to Work, and with Big Labor on the verge of buying a lock grip on the U.S. Senate, I want to help turn the heat all the way up on Governor Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. I have: - Called Governor Bill Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. - Enclosed a contribution to pay for the ads you are already running in newspapers across the natior?: __ $1,000 - $500 __ $200 __ $100

~ $25 - Other ($ )

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC. The NJhond Rtnhl to Work Cornmittre's Wshmaon DC Headquarters IS loc~ledat our nation'; a01- tal nt 8001 Brsddock Ro R d. Sulte 5M) Sp& eld. VA 22160 Teleohone (800)325 -7892 kauw rhe 1 rontnbuhons are nnt lax dcductible as chantable conmbuhon,. A COALITION OF EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYERS

REED URSON Prezidenl

October 27, 1992 Dear Wyoming Member: Right to Work is in deep trouble. Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip over the U.S. Senate. If Organized Labor takes control over both the White House and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in jeopardy -- including your own. Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'll work to repeal Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section .. . 14(bl i! authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work ?! I laws. .i.. c; I have taken emergency action to alert Wyoming citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify your Right to Work law. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support for compulsory unionism. Enclosed, please find a copy of an advertisement I am sending to newspapers throughout Wyoming. Similar versions are running in newspapers in Right to Work states across the country. I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clictoc has vowed ta ferce 2very U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads not only in Wyoming, but also in other Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed more than $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending power grab.

WASHiNGTON DC HEADOUARTERS 8001 BRADDOCK ROAD SUITE 500 SPRINGFIELD VIRGINIA 22160 TEL (7031321-9820 "Amerrcans musr have the fighl but nor be comoelled to loin labor unions'' ~~- WY

But I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support COmpUlSOry unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that yo one should ever be forced to ioin a union to feed his or her family. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they're still listening.

Please, please, call Governor Clinton IMMEDIATELY at 1 (800) 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is morally wrong and economically disastrous for Wyoming.

And if you can, please send a special contribution today to help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising .... blitz. i.... .i ...G.. , : :I Wyoming's Right tu Work law may depend on it. Sincerely,

P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft- Hartley Act, thousands of Wyoming jobs will be lost. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ad. BiU Clinton Wsnts to Force You to Psy Union ww the magic wdrunim officials sa want to hear: "I suppat re+ of Scuioo 14(b) ofthe Tdt-Hmley ACL" Dues to Work in Wyoming Seslim 14@) ruluizu sue legiilituns toemu Right 10 As Gwma. Bill Clim hg@ abhis SUI'S Right w WdINS. Rep1of Section 14@) =wid mpil ill 21 IUI Wdbw to IM new pbr uid small huinuru to Arlrmnur. Right to Work laws - including Wyam'ng'r. In6a.rirl;mur'RighLw WmkLw(whichallowrw?kn!o Uniar you chsngc Bill Clinun'r mind. he and a new Big cboosc whether u om w pywlim due) eorbld Bill Clim Lbx cmuollcd Saaumay repeal yan Right w Wuk law wbw4lhubis rule"nnkr Istin &-uy in gmMh dnew md faVnS of lhouundr Of Wymhg WCdcrS lo ply wlim pbr... and4lhin bmme baras&" ducs Q bc fmd Thadcjj&x would IC loir/orcvcr. 'whatever Y'all Want': Clinton "rad6 Right union Control Over the White House and to Work for Big Labor Support Congress = Forced Unionism But to win the sum of Orgldrzed Labor's massive UNLESS YOU TEUV BILL CLIsWN AROUM) ON pdiuul machine (which dmnprovcrS350 million into RIGHTTO WOW NOW. union power broksrs may be able fcdcnl cleftimns crch yur), Bill CIintw now pomiws Iha w prrjust atout my law lhcy want in the fun 1W days of P AFL-CIO he'll huryhis omSUI - md yunr - by Clinlon Adminisrntioll. mpllingd121 suIRightto Worklaws. Right now is Ihc bur time Now's when the palLicianr arc still liitming to YOU. Give 'em m orful.

1) CJI 1 (800)3lS789f or 2) M~ll8 conlributloa psjable to MTWC. 8001 Braddock Road, Mw. Spring~eld.VA 22160. (ChmhunW M nL1, YI -mYr, From:

TO: Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 1 8001 Braddock Road, Suite 500 Springfield, Virginia 22160

Reed : With Bill Clinton vowing to destroy Right to Work, and with Big Labor on the verge of buying a lock grip on the U.S. Senate, I want to help turn the heat all the wav up on Governor Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. I have: - Called Governor Bill Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. - Enclosed a contribution to pay for the ads you are already running in newspapers across the nation: __ $1,000 __ $500 - $200 - $100

- $25 - Other ($ )

Please make checks payable and return to: NRWC. The National Rat to Work Committee's Washin@on D.C. Headauarten is located at ow nation's caaDi- -dock Road. Suite 500 Sorinefield. VA 22160 Teleuhone (8001 325-7892. Recause the IRS has recoanized NRTWC ils tax exempt under IRC Sec 501(c1(4). which permits unlimited lobbving, contributions are not tax deductible as charitable contributions iete

A COALITION OF EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYERS

REED URSON. Ptealaonl

October 27, 1992

Dear Virginia Member: Right to Work is in deep trouble. Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip over the U.S. Senate. If Organized Labor takes control over both the White House and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in jeopardy -- including your own. Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'll work to repeal Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work laws. I have taken emergency action to alert Virginia citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify your Right to Work law. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support €or compulsory unionism. Enclosed, please find a copy of an advertisement I am sending to newspapers throughout Virginia. Similar versions are running in newspapers in Right to Work states across the country. I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads not only in Virginia, but also in other Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed more than $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending power grab.

WASHINGTON D C HEADOUARTERS. 8001 BRADDOCK ROAD. SUITE 500. SPRINGFIELD. VIRGINIA 22160 0 TEL (7031 321-9820 "Amerrcans musl have Ihe righf bul no1 be Compelled lo loin laboi unions''

~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ VA

But I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support compulsory unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to join a union to feed his Or her familv. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they're still listening.

Please, please, call Governor Clinton IMMEDIATEL'r' at i (6003 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is morally wrong and economically disastrous for Virginia. And if you can, please send a special contribution today to help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising blitz. Virginia's Right to Work law may depend on it. Sincerely,

P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft- Hartley Act, thousands of Virginia jobs will be lost. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ad. ,

Bill Clinton Wants to Force You to Pay Union wdc mngic words union officids u) wmt lo her. "I mpptmanl of Scaion 14(b) of ihc Taft-Hartley Act.'' DMSto Work in Virginia Sdm 14@) rutkhaizu sue legisinurns Y, enad Right 10 I\I Govema. E9 CZam bagged absa his SUE'S Right LO Wdlaws. Remof Sscliao I+) wwld mpal all 21 sue Wai; law lo llvc new jobr md smd hiacrru LO hrlrmru. Right to Work laws - including Viamia's. hI.4Abnru'Rightm Wdhw(which.Ilows~rhrs~~ Unlas you change BU ClinM's mind, he and a new Big choorewanawpyuniardua)enlb~edBill ainm Lborcmmllcd Smis may -1 ywRigblto Wak law lobanhuhir rwc'nnts lrtin hwq yl pwhdnew and faccM of thousands of V~+ni,.~..iawaken to pay wlim j&. . . and 4th in incane inous~" dues m bc fd. TWdcfjobs wuld k losr/orrvrr. 'Whatever Y'all Want': Clinton 'had6 Right Union Control Gver the White House and to Work for Big Labor Support Congrers = Forced Unionism But LO win he of Orgmizcd Urn's massive UNLFSS YOU TURN BILL CLINTON AROUND ON politiul machine (which dumps over $350 miUim into RlGM To WORK NOW. union power brokers may be able federal cls~timseach year). Bill Clircn now pomivs he LO pnss jusl about my law they want in lefurl LOO drys of a AnCIO he'll bmay his own SUI- and yours - by Clinm Admioiradon. repuling dl 21 sate Right to Work Lws. Right now is lekt time. Now's when lepoliticians In his umpign e.PuIing Pcoplc fusf.BiU QinM KC still lisvning Lo YOU. Give 'em an urfui.

RIGHTTO WORK! Emergency Citizen Action Re

From:

To: Reed Lsrson, President Nations1 Right to Work Committee I 8001 Eraddock Road, Suite 500 Springfield, Virginia 22160

P.54 : With Bill Clinton vowing to destroy Right to Work, and with Big Labor on the verge of buying a lock grip on the U.S. Senate, I want to help turn the heat all the wav up on Governor Clinton and the -candidates for the U.S. Senate. I have: __ Called Governor Bill Clinton and the candidates €or the U.S. Senate. - Enclosed a contribution to pay for the ads you are already running in newspapers across the nab'Lon : __ $1,000 __ $500 - $200 __ $100

__ $25 __ Other ($ )

Please make checks payable arid return to: NRTWC. The National Rivht to Work Committee's Washington D.C. Headquarters is located at our nation's -Vi- 1-a 1-a oad S 'te 500 * S ri m 22160 .Teienhone (81x))3257892. kauleLhL: IRS has recoenized NRWC as t3x exemDt under IRCSec. 501(c)(4). which wmib unlimited lobbving, contributions are not tax deductible as charitable contributions ~E~Q~D~ TO : RE, RG, , DBK, ME, REF, mx, PRS, SHS, SJ (I-Copies) , BLS

DATE : Attached are samples of the followf~sailings (Xerox copies are substituted in so e instances). Drop dates, codes hagd counts can bd obtained fro the purchasing departreat.. Please $a not COEqmwimtS of tha packages back to purchasing (Carriers, etc. 1. amnal Right To oak Gomrnittee

A COALITION OF EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYERS

REED LARSON. Prosldmi

October 26, 1992

I Dear Member: , ,.__~~. t2~' , i--..i~:..7 Right to Work is in deep trouble. i; ; . .- Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union . ._.. basses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip ovsr the U.S. Senate. ._.i'n.. .. g si If Organized Labor takes control over both the White House and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in -.- jeopardy . -:.3 Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'll work to repeal 5 Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section i!j i!j :4b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work laws. I have taken emergency action to alert citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify all 21 state Right to Work laws. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support for compulsory unionism. Attached, please find a copy of the advertisement we are running in Right to Work states across the country. In some states, I have borrowed money to pay for the ad. In others, our tight finances have forced me to simply ask editors to run the ad as a public service. (Even if they won't run the ad for free, I hope our requests will prompt some favorable editorials.) I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads in Right to Work states?

WASHINGTON DC. HEADQUARTERS 8001 BHADDOCK ROAD, SUITE 500 SPRINGFIELD, VIRGINIA 22160 TEL. (703)321-9W0 "Americans musf have the righf but nor be compelled to join labor unions" *. 't

I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed over $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending power grab. But I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support compulsory unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to join a union to feed his family. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they're still listening.

Please, please, call Governor Clinton IMMEDIATELY at 1 (800) 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is morally wrong, and economically disastrous for America.

\*.,;! And if you can, please send a special contribution today to :-. I t ;., help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising blitz. The future of Right to Work may depend on it. Sincerely,

Reed Larson

P.S If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills all 21 state Right to Work laws by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act, thousands of American jobs will be lost or driven overseas. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ads. /. ' c ,

Bill Clinton and Richard Stding Want to Congressman Richard SWgsalso Betrays Force You to Pay Union Dues to Work in Idaho Idaho's Right to Work Law As Covcmor. Bill Clinton brqgrd about his IUIC'S bght to Last year. Congressman Stallingr voted to enact Senator Work law to IUIC ncu juhr admall businesses IO &kannr=. rCd K~I~~~~J~.,~u,itt~~~,strlic bcii (s. 35). neSI& In f,xt, kkmus' Right IO Work lw (which allows workrs to bdl wuuld haw lbrced workers to mke. Union "0q;mizcrs" chmr whether or not to pdy union dues) cnablcd Bill Clinton would cit11 vinuslly any strike they wish and win any strike to baut that his swtc "mlr 1st in thc caunry in growth of they mcitr. Employers could h: forced to RE workers who ncw jobs . . , and 4th in momc incTc.Ly." disobey union strike orders. 'Whatever Y'dl Want': Clinton 'hdes Right If Congressman Stallings had prevailed. Kennedy's Fbhhuttan Stnkc hill would havc blown a gaping hole in to Work for Big Labor Support Idaho'r Right to Work law. Kcnnedy'r Stnkc bill sailed But to win the rupprn of Organized Labor's milsbivr through the USHouw of Reprercnwliver . . . thanks to palitical ntxhinr. (which dumps over 5350 million into Congressman Stalling>. fcJcml e1ect;onr cxh yeul. Bill Clinton now promises the AFL-CIO he'll bctny his own mtc -and yours - by C0-m Stauing is Hiding hwn YOU rcpcding dl 21 state Righi to Work laws. Hundreds ofIdaho members of thc National Right to In his campaign balk. Purfrn# Pmple Firs!. Bill Clinton Work Commiace have conlacled Congrtsrmm Slallings wrote thc magic words union officiillr so want to hear: "I urging him tu answer the Commitse's Candidate Survey. ruppon E~ZII of Section 141h) of the Taft.n-HanlcyAct." But Congmiman Stallings rciuws to tcII you whether he'll ktion 14lb) authorizer stale Icgislatulrs to enxt Right to defend your Right to Work law in the US. Senate next year. Work laws. Rcpcil of Section I4 (b)wuuld rcpcal dl 21 Cungrcssman Stallings' opponent. Dirk Kempthomc. state Right to Work law%- including Idaho's. pledger to suppon Right to Work 100% - cspccidly Unless you chmgc Bill Clrntan'r mind. hc and Scnatc Idaho'\ Right to Work law. Conglrrsmnn Stdlings should Candidale Richad Stallingr may re@ your Right to Work publicly vow to suppan Right to Work, tw. law and farcc ICN of thousands of Iddm wuorhrs lo pay union dues or tc lid. ntrwsdofjobr would br lost forcwr Union Control over the White Howand .-~------,Congress = Ford Unionism UNLESS YOU TURN BILL CLINTON AND RICHARD j HELP SAVE IDAHO'S RIGHT TO WORK! STALLINCS AROUND ON RIGHT TO WORK NOW I Tell Clinton and Slallings not to force Idaho i union power broken may bc able to pass jus1 aboul any law they want in the first 100 days of a Clinton Adminismatian. Right now i; the ksttime. Now's when thc polilicims xe w11 listening to YOU. Give 'em an earful. From:

To : Reed Larson, President National Right tu Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite 500 Springfield, Virginia 22160

Reed : With Bill Clinton vowing to destroy Right to Work, and with Big Labor on the verge of buying a lock grip on the U.S. Senate, I want to helr, turn the heat all the way UD on Governor Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. I have: __ Called Governor Bill Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. - Enclosed a contribution to pay for the ads you are already running in newspapers across the nation: __ $1,000 __ $500 __ $200 __ $100

__ $25 - Other ($ )

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC. The Nnhonnl R eht lo Work Committees Waqhmmoo DC HeJdaumlers !s lmfedJI oiir nation's UPJ- 131 at 8001 Braadwk Road. Swte 5M1 SDnneh:!d. VA Teleuhone (80)325-7892 fkc3uw?52& - ~~ ~~ DIM IRS has recomized NR"JC as tax exempt under IRC $c 501(c)(4). which permits unlimited IobbVinE contributions are not tax deductible as charitable contributions. .;I ,....,.. L~i ...ij~.- .. ;‘_I..

..I. ..

,T7, ..- . BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMSsION :“J .. ) .... In the Matter of .. Witness Subpoena to ) MUR 3774

#d-. The National Right to) 1 :::j WorkCommittee ) , .- < , i.2

DOCUMEWTS PROM NRTWC

DEPART REEDLARSON 8001 BRADOOCK ROAD SPRINGFIELD.VIRGINIA 22.160

October 23, 1992

Dear . I'm writing you a personal letter today because I'm very concerned about how Congressman wlll vote on compulsory-unionism legislation if he becomes Colorado's next U.S. Senator. If, as a U.S. Senator, Ben Campbell continues to vote to hand compulsory-unionism powers to Big tabor, ColoradQ will suffer. And SO will the entire nation. Until now, Congressman Campbell has voted wit& the union hierarchy and against individual freedom for workers and small businesses almost every time. As one of Big Labor's most reliable water carriers in the U.S. House of Representatives, CoEgressman Campbell helped pass Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill (I3.R. 5/S. 55). The Strike bill failed with only one vote to spare in the Senate. And in 1990, Mr. Campbell voted twice in the House to allow government union chieftains to declare open season on harassing 2.9 million federal employees and thousands of U.S. taxpayers to support the union political machine by repealing the Hatch Act. Big Labor came just two votes shy of corralling enough senators to override President Bush's veto and wt the 53-year-old law. Mr. CampbeLl's vote in the Senate could put Big Labor over the top on these ana countless other union-boss power grabs. Organized tabor is within a whisker of total control over our federal government. If the union political machine sweeps Colorado and just two other Senate seats into Big Liibor's vote column (and possibly the White House as well), Mr. Campbell could cast the key Senate vote to enact the entire union-boss political agenda into law.

He could vott to destroy all state RiZjht to Work laws by abolishing Section la(5) of the Taft-Hartley Act, enact Lie 3ushbutton Strike bill, repeal the Batch Act, ana force all government employees to pay union dues to swell Big Labor's political and organiziag coffers. That's why I've urqed you to inundarz C~ngrsssmanCampbell with phone calls, i?tt.-rs and ?osxar.ls. Tbcusancs of angry Colorado citizefis are urging his to support iii5h.c :J Worlc. 10784939

But Congress Campbell continues to st wall. Your protests seem to be falling on deaf ears. Why is Ben Campbell ignoring you and the rest of the huge majority of Colorado citizens who oppose compulsory unionism? Union operatives have stuffed $505,000 into his campaigns for the U.S. House and now the Sanate. And that cash is only the tip of the iceberg. Union political pros have probably dumped ten times that into Congressman Campbell's campaigns in the form of "soft money" -- partisan get-out-the-vote drives, phone banks, and full-time paid "volunteers.I' So while congressman Campbell is refusing to tell Right to Work supporters his position on forced unionism, union lobbyists know he'll vote any way they say. It's a simple (if sleazy) arrangement. He votes their way -- they bankroll his congressional and senate campaigns with forced-union dues stolen from American workers. Please call Congressman Campbell now at (303) 837-0565 and urge him to repudiate his support for forced unionism. Only youl howls and screams can make Congressman Campbell renounce his cozy relationship with Big Labor. Tell Congressman Campbell you won't stand for his political dirty pool of taking Big Labor backroom payoffs -- while he stonewalls Colorado citizens. Tell him he's not fooling anvbody, and urge him to stop voting to force workers to pay union dues. On the other hand, Mr. Campbell's opponent, Terry Considine, respond to his survey 100% & Right to Work. Mr. Considine has promised to help &GEJ Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill, fight for tougher enforcement of the Supreme Court's ban on the use of forced dues for politics, oppose efforts to require public servants to pay union dues, and crack down on strike violence. However, Mr. Considine is under intense pressure from union goons to renounce his Right to Work support. It's vital that you tell Mr. Considine not to back down. Please call him at (303) 757-2567 and tell him the people of Colorado support his pledge.

Reed Larson

P.S Congressman Ben Nighthorse Campbell must feel the heat from concerned citizens like you to stop voting to force workers to pay union dues. Now is the time, in the face of a tough U.S. Senate battle, when he is most likely to mend his Washington ways. Please call him today. CO

US. Senate QUQS~OIlSI: 12345678% auesuons#: 123856789 Di.+rint 3 BMrbst 6 auesuena~:I 23456789 Mike Calihac-D ------Tom Kolbe-5 N--N-NYN- @en Campbell-D ------1303) 320-3918 (303) 850-9867 (3031 837-0565 Scott Mc1~is-R YYYYYYYNY Dan Schaefer-R -__------Terry Considlne-R 'Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y (303) 242-4623 (3031 989-2100 (3031 757-2567 DA&.Xt 4 1 US. House of Representatives Tom Redder-D ------1303) 224-9767 i OU~S~UM~S#:I. z 3 4 s 6 7 e B Wayne Allard-R YYYYYYYYY I :>: (1 ai&ri& 1 .: 1 I3031 226-2226 ~: Pat Schroeder-D -_------, ii' -. (303) 866-1230 aLtrM 5 I ++ ------:.:/ Raymond Diaz Aragon-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Charles Oriez-D - Key: ' +. (303) 320-6607 .%J 1303) 798-3236 Joel Hefley-R YYYYYYYYY Y =Yes:' ' LDUtriat2 1303) 933-0044 N =NO , ... - - - - - I - - - :... David Skaggs-D - =NoResponse ... !:: (303) 650-7886 . .. , .. !-:i L- Bryan Day-R YYYYYYYYY .. (3031 422-8692

it.. id

.. -. !. 1. Do you believe an employee wko does not want the "services" 6. Will you support amendments to the Federal Elect& of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dys union his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidates opposed by, union as .... . forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you suppoxt repeal of the provisions in federal laws which 7. Will you oppose so-called "anti-double breasting" lqislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has, as its primary goal, to forcibly unionize employees of construction companies? 3. Do you favor presavation of Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act, which authorizes state Right to Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to wden or desboy the Match Act, which protects federal employees €iGm union political 4. Would you suppon legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextonion statute? 9. Will you oppose legislation hat would punish or require the firing of employees who choose to work during a smke, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, srate, give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees to pay union dues?

Note: The National Right to Work Committee, of course, endorses no candidates. we are a nonpanisan organization. But we believe tllat you as a Right to Work suppmr are. entitled to know which candidates will support the right of every American to earn a living - without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. rile inlormation below is helpful in explaining the questions on the rev- side of this fm. A union. under present federal laws, is empowered to the administration of President John F. Kennedy. represent and bind all employees in a company's bargaining unit - including employees who oppose. the union and don't 6. Labor unions are the only private organization in the U.S. want its "services." which can legally force individuals to pay dues into their This monopoly bargaining power. generally described as !xeaslRies. "exclusive bargaining rights," eprives employees of their right The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) prohibits union to bargain for themselves. Union officials fought for this power officials from giving any of these dues dollars directly to a and refuse to give it up: yet they complain they are "unfairly candidate for feded office. burdened by the legal obligation" to represent nonmembers. At the same time, FECA permits union officials to use Such complaints are intended to pave the way for compelling workers' compulsory dues dollars for "in-kind" political financial support hmsodled "free riders" for representation spending on goods and sewicee to elect candidates for fedenl they do not want. offices. 'ihese "in-kind" expendim are in addition to union PAC The firing of workers who refuse to pay union dues and/or contributions; they seldom if ever documented or fees is explicitly sanctioned by both the National Labor are - - repopted to the Fdeiai Election Commission. Relations Act and the. National Railway Labor ACL Section of the NLRA. for example, stipulates that No oficial statistics for total union "in-kind" expenditures 7 available. But Labor columnist Vitoe Rile~timted employees shall have "the right to refrain" from participating in an that union activities "except to the extent that such right may be this so-called "soft money" mounted to 10 times no= tm affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor what union PACs gave in cash contributions. Bdon that organization as a condition of employment" yardstick, union "soft money" in 1990 exceedled $350 million. The problem of compulsory unionism was created by 7. In recent years, legislation has been inaoduced in Congress Congress. It will not be solved until Congress repeals the to automatically impose union representation upn workers of existing federal authorizarions of compulsory unionism. nonunionized companies which have even the slightest In 21 states, wage earners - except those covered by the econmic W to unionized companies. National RaiIway Labor Act - are shielded from compulsory Even though the nonunionized and the unionized companies unionism by Right to Work laws. each perform separate and &*hct wck. the compulsory union The Florida guarantee is typical of these laws, saying, 'The contract would be automatically imposed upon the nonunion right of persons to work shall not be denied or abridged on workers. without even the show of an election conduckd by the axaunt of membership or nonmembership in any bbor union or National Labor Ftelafions Board to determine workersuppoh labor orgailaon." 'ihe "anti-double bmwringw1egi&it2..rr would also encourage The authority of states to adopt and enforce such laws is Common Situs picketing by pennitning union o&s to use reaffii by Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley amendments to a dispute with a single subcontractor as an excuse (0 picket and the National Labor ReIations Act. shut down all the other subcmcrs~torsat a job site. 4. Extortion, as a technique, is extremely useful to union 8. Legislation has been inaoduced ze-peatedy in Congress to omCials in obtaining such demands as compulsory union shops, loosen the 50-yearaldl Hatch Act's restrictions against partisan "'agency" shops, compulsory hiring halls and irrevocable dues political activity by federal employee.. check-off clauses. Federal union officials now wield monopoly bargaining Wemost dnallaw is administered at the state and local power ovez f&d employees. which makes union officicials the level, some criminal activities (including extortion), which sole conduit for civil servants in collective bargaining and obsrmct interstate commerce, have been deemed by Congress to grievance situations. be so important that they should be covered by federal statutes. Current proposals to weaken the Hatch Act lack explicit As the federal law currently stands, union officials have prohibitions against the use of monoply bargaining power to unique special immunities from prosecution for threatening to commit or committing felonies - such as murder. coerce civil servants into supporting federal union officials' manslaughter, maiming. arson, aggravated property destruction. political agenda. explosives or firearms offenses, etc. - to obtain collective 9. Legislation has been introduced in Congress that would bargaining demands. prevent employers from King permanent replacement workers 5. For the past several years, Congress ha$ been confronted by during a strike. bills designed to authorize the forced unionization of public The bill's provisions would also penalize workers who employees at various levels of government. choose not to sake by giving preferential. post-suike hiring Several of these. proposals are aimed at state, county and privileges to strikers. municipal employees and would nullify existing stale laws Since an employer is unlikely to find employees who will which shield public employees from union coercion. work during a violent strike under these conditions, employers Other bills would strip postal workers and other federal would be forced III cave iii to every demand by union officials employees of the fdom of choice gumteed by the Postal - including the demand that workers who refuse to pay union Reorganization Act of 1970 and executive orders dating back to dues be fired. To: Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Conunittee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite %500 Springfield, VA 22160

From:

i

Dear Reed:

I have:

Called the candidates.

Written a personal letter or otherwise contacted the candidates.

Enclosed a contribution Of: ,

$25 $50 $100 i

$530 Other

Please make checks payable and return to: NRWC. Thhc Nalion~lbeht IO Work Cammllleei Wmhmmon DC Hexlauarters ts lmtcd at our nalion's opt- 1AIdV N). 78 .Bel"$?& Iffi has mamized NRTNC LF haexcmut under IRC ST. jmfc)(4). which mihunlimiled lobbwnt conlnbrioonb JIP not hi deductible 3, chsntoble mnlnbuhons REEDLARSON 8001 BRADDOCKROAD SPRINGFIELD.VIRGINIA 22160

October 23, 1S32

Dear . . I'm writing you a personal letter today because I'm very concerned ahout how Congressman Richard Stallings will vote on compulsory-unionism legislation If he becomes Idaho's next U.S Senator. If, as a U.S. Senator, Richard Stallings continues to vote to hand compulsory-Wonism powers to Big Labor, Idaho will suffer. And so will the entire nation. Until now, Congressman Stallings has voted with the union hierarchy and against individual freedom for workers and small .. businesses ahost every time. c2.. . As one of Big Labor's most reliable water carriers in the U.S. House of Representatives, Congressman Stallings helped pass Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill (H.R. 5,'s. 55). The Strike bill failed with only one vote to spare in the Senate. And in 1990, Mr. Stallings voted twice in the House to allow government union chieftains to declare open season an harassing 2.9 million federal employees and thousands of U.S. taxpayers to support the union political machine by repealing the Hatch Act. Big Labor came just two votes shy of corralling enough senators to override President Bush's veto and gut the 53-year-old law. Mr. Stalling's vote in the Senate could put Big Labor over the top on these and countless other union-boss power grabs. Organized Labor is within a whisker of total control over our federal government. If the union political machine sweeps Idaho and just two other Senate seats into Big Labor's vote column (and possibly the White House as well), Mr. Stallings could cast the key Senate vote to enact the entire union-boss political agenda into law.

Ze could vota 'io destroy Idaho's hard-won Eiqnt to Work law by akolishing Section 34jb) of the Taft-Hartley Act, enact the Bushbutton Strike bill, repeal Cle Iiatch Act, and force all qovealment enployees to pay union dues to swell Big Labor's political and organking coffers.

That's why I've urged you to inundate Cangrossman Stallinqs tilth phone calls, ;.ttzcrs and postcards. Thousands of angry Idaho citizens aze urging him to support Riqnc to Work. !. But Congress Stallings continues to ewall. Your protests seem to be falling on deaf ears. Why is Richard Stallings ignoring you and the rest of the huge majority of Idaho citizens who oppose compulsory unionism? Union operatives nave stuffed $270,500 into his campaigns for the U.S. House and now the Senate. And that cash is only the tip of the iceberg. Union political pros have probably dumped ten times that into Congressman Stallings's campaigns in the form of "soft money" -- partisan get-out-the-vote drives, phone banks, and full-time paid "volunteers" . So while Congressman Stallings is refusing to tell Right to Work supporters his position or. forced unionism, union lobbyists know he'll vote any way they say. It's a simple (if sleazy) arrangement. He votes their way -- they bankroll his congressional and senate campaigns with forced-union dues stolen from American workers. Please call Congressman Stallings at (208) 336-1992 and urge him to repudiate his support for forced unionism. Only howls and screams can make Congressman Stallings renounce his cozy relationship with Big Labor.

i~.-I : Tell Congressman Stallings you won't stand for his political .. . , ... , .: .- L1 dirty pool of taking Big Labor backroom payoffs -- while he stonewalls Idaho citizens. Tell him he's not fooling my and urge him to stop voting to force workers to pay union dues. On *&e other hand, Mr. Stalling's opponent, , Pjg respond to his survey 100% far Right to Work. Mr. Kempthorne has promised to help Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill, fight for tougher enforcement of the Supreme Court's ban on the use of forced dues for politics, oppose efforts to require public servants to pay union dues, and crack down on strike violence. However, Mr. Kempthorne is under intense pressure from union goons to renounce his Right to Work support. It's vital that you tell Mr. Kempthorne not to back down. Please call him at (208) 336-0092 and tell him the people of Idaho support his pledge. Sincerely,

Reed Larson P.S. Congressman Richard Stallings must feel the heat from concerned citizens lake you to stop voting to force workers to pay union dues. Now is the time, in the face of a tough U.S. Senate battle, when he is most likely to mend his Washington ways. Please call him today. ID

.. '. I

U.S. Senate auestionsPI: 123456789 Richard Stallings-O ------(208) 336-1992 Dirk Kempthorne-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y (208) 336-0092 I. . US. House of Representatives Qu~sti01~88:123456789 luntslue I Larry LaRocco-D ------Rachel Gilbert-R YYYYYYYYY

Dintsiat 2 J.D. Williams-D ------Michael Crapo-R YYYYYYYYY

. -$. 1. Do you believe an employee wwb, does not want Ute "savices" 6. Will you support amendments to the Federal Elecuon of a Iabi~union should have the right to re& to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory mion dues union as his exclusive repmenrative, which federal law now and fees far political caws and candidata ~~BxIby en forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in feded laws which 7. W& you oppose socded "anti-double bmting" legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has, as its primary goal. forcibly uni~nizeemployees of conmction compnies? 3. Do you favor pmmation of Section le)of the Taft-Hartley Act, which authorizes state Right to Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or desmy the Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union po!ldcal 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecudon under the federal antiextonion statute? 9. Will you oppose legislation that would punish or quire the firing of employees who choose to work during a strike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state, give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees to pay union dues?

Mote: The National Right to Work Committee, of come. endorses no candidates. We are a nonpartisan organization. But we believe that you as a Right td, Work supporter are entitled to know which candidates will support the right of every American to earn a living -without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. The information below is helpful in explaining Ihe - auestions on the reverse si& of this form. 1. A union. under present federal laws. is empowered to the administration of President John F. Kennedy. represent and bind all employees in a company’s bargaining Labor unions the only private organi~ationin the U.S. unit - including employees who oppose the union and don’t 6. are want its “services.” which can legally force individuals to pay dues into their This monopoly bargaining power, generally described as rIcaswies. “exclusive bargaining rights,” deprives employees of their right The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) pmhibiu union to bvgain for themselves. Union officials fought for this power officials from giving any of these dues dollars dieeclly to a and refuse to give it up; yet they complain they are “unfairly candidate far federal office. burdened by the legal obligation” to represent nonmemb. At the same time, FECA pennits union officials to use Such complaints are intended to pave the way for compelling workers’ compulsory dues dollars for “in-kied” political fmcial support from socalled “free riders” for representation spending on goods and seMces to elect candidates for federal they do not want. offices. These “in-kind“ expen$itures are. in addition to union PAC The fuhg of workers who refuse to pay union dues and/or contributions; they seldom if ever documented cr fees is explicitly sanctioned by both the National Labor are - - reported to the Federal Election Commission. I i..! Relations Act and the National Railway Labor Act .. No official staristics for total union %-kind” expenditures .....i 1 Section 7 of the NLRA, for example, stipulates that employees shall have “the right to refrain’’ from participating in axe available. But Labor columnist Victor Riesel estimated that union activities “except to the extent that such fight may be thii so-called “soft money” amounted to 10 times more than ~. affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor what union PACs gave in cash conaibutions. Based on that ...... organization a condition of employment.” yardstick, union “soft money” in 1Mexceeded $350 millio!?. . .. as i. I The problem of compulsory unionism was created by 7. h recent years, legislation has been introduced in Congress Congress. It will not be solved until Congress repeals the to automatically impose union qresentation upon workers of .. . ._ existing federal authorizarions of compulsory unionism. nonunionized companies which have even the slightest - In 21 states, wage earners - except those covered by the economic links to miznized companies. National Railway Labor Act - are shieIded from compulsory Even though the nonunionized and the unionized companies unionism by Right to Work laws. each perform separate and distinct work, the compulsory union The Florida guarantee is typical of these laws. saying, The conmct would be automatically imposed upon the nonunion right of persons to work shall not be denied or abridged on workers, Without even the show of an election c~nductedby the account of membership or nonmembership in any labor union or National Labor Relations Boanl to detamine worker support. labor obganizatim.” The “antidouble breasting“ legislation would ahencourage The authonty of states to adopt and enforce such laws is Common Situ picketing by permitting union organizers to use dmed by Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley amendmenfs to a dispute with a single subconIxactur a an excuse to picket and rk National Labor Relah’ons Act shut down all the ob-. wbtmmat a job site. . ’ 4. Extortion, as a technique, is extremely useful to union 8. Legislation has been intnduced repeatedly in Congress to officials in obrainiig such demands as compulsory union shops, loosen the 5O-yeawld Hatch Act’s mtrictiork against partisan . ,.. “agency” shops, compulsory hiring halls and irrevocable dues political activity by federal employees. ., check-off clauses. Federal union officials now wield monopoly bargaining White most aiminal law is administered at the state and local power over federal employees, which makes union ofticials the level. some criminal activities (including extortion), which sole conduit for civil servants in collective bargaining and obstruct interstate commerce. have been deemed by Coneto griwance situations. be so important that they should be covered by federal statutes. Current proposals to weaken the HaEh Act lack explicit As the federal law currently stands. union officials have prohibitions against the use of monopoly bargaining power to unique special immunities horn prosecution for threatening to commit or committing felonies - such as murder, coerce civil sewants into supporting federal union officials’ manslaughter, maiming. arson, aggravated property desrmction, political agenda. explosives or firearms offenses, etc. - to obtain coilective 9. Legislation has been introduced in Congress that would bargaining demands. prevent employers from king permanent replacement workers 5. For the past several years, Congress has been confronted by during a strike. bills designed to authorize the forced unionization of public The bill’s provisions would also penalize workers who employees at various levels of government. choose not to strike by giving preferential. post-strike hiring Several of these proposals are aimed at sfate, county and privileges to strikers. municipal employees and would nullify existing state laws Since an employer is unlikely to find employees who will which shield public employees from union coercion. work during a violent smke under these conditions, employers Other bills would strip postal workers and other federal would be forced to cave in to every demand by union officials employees of he freedom of choice guaranteed by the Postal - including the demand that workers who refuse :o pay union Renrganization Act of 1970 and executive orders dating back to dues be fired. To: Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Conunittee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite 1500 Springfield, VA 22160

From:

Dear Reed:

I have:

Called the candidates.

Written a personal letter or otherwise contacted the candidates.

Enclosed a contriSution of: I__

$25 $50 $100

-- $500 Other

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC. IE has m~zdNRlWCm bxexempt under lRC% Ml(d(4).which mi%unllmiled lobbvr& pntnbuhonr arc not tax drductible ~sch~nlnblrmnlnbuhons. REEDLARSON 8oOI BRADDOCK ROAD SPRINGFIELD. VIRGINIA 22160

October 23, 1992

Dear : I'm writing you a personal letter today because I"m very concerned about how Senator Terry Sanford will vote on compulsory- unionism legislation if North Carolinians vote him another term. If Senator Sanford continues to vote to hand compulsory- unionism powers to Big Labor, North Carolina will suffer. And SO will the entire nation. Until now, Senator Sanford has voted with the union hierarchy and against individual freedom for workers and small businesses almost every time. Terry Sanford is one of Big Labor's most reliable water carriers in the Senate. In 1990 and 1992, Senator Sanford voted to overturn the 1988 Supreme Court &.& decision, which forbids the use of forced dues for politics. Again and again, Senator Sanford has voted to force workers to pay for political causes they don't agree with. And in 1990, Mr. Sanford voted twice to allow government Union chieftains to declare open season on harassing 2.9 million federal employees 'and thousands of U.S. taxpayers to support the union political machine by repealing the Hatch Act. Big Labor came just two votes shy of corralling enough senators to over- ride President Bush's veto and gat the 53-year-old law. Mr. Sanford's vote in the Senate could put Big Labor Over the top on these and countless other union-boss power grabs. Organized Labor is within a whisker of total control over our federal government. If the union political machine sweeps North Carolina and just two other Senate seats into Big Labor's vote column (and possibly the White House as well), Mr. Sanford could cast the key Senate vote to enact the entire union-boss political agenda into law.

Be could vote to destroy North Carolina's cherished Rignt to Work law by abolishing Section l4(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act, enact the Pusbhutton Strike bill, r3peal Lbe Eiatch Act, and force all qoverment empLoyeos to gay union dues to swell ai5 Labor's poiitical and organizing coffers.

ThaZ's IJ;".~ i've urqed you to irmndat? Ser,azor Sanford wit-\ pi--one calls, Ittzers azc posicards. Thousands 02 angry NDrt!! Carolina citizens urging him to support R But Senator Sanford continues to stonewall. Your protests seem to be falling on deaf ears. why is Terry Sanford ignoring you and the rest of the huge majority of North Carolina citizens who oppose compulsory unionism? Union operatives have stuffed $455,000 into his campaigns for the Senate. And that cash is only the tip of the iceberg. Union political pros have probably dumped ten times that into Senator Sanford's campaigns in the form of "soft money'' -- partisan get- out-the-vote drives, phone banks, and paid "volunteers." So while Senator Sanford is refusing to tell Right to Work supporters his position on forced unionism, union lobbyists know he'll vote any way they say. It's a simple (if sleazy) deal: He votes their way -- they bankroll his campaigns with forced union dues stolen from American workers. Please call Senator Sanford at (800) 722-1992 and urge him to repudiate his support for forced unionism. Only howls and screams can make Senator Sanford renounce his COZY relationship with Big Labor. Tell Senator Sanford you won't. stand for his political dirty pool of taking Big Labor backroom payoffs -- while he stonewalls North Carolina citizens. Tell him he's not fooling anvbody, and urge him to stop voting to force workers to pay union dues. On the other hand, Mr. Sanford*s opponent, Lauch Faircloth, &!&J. respond to his survey 100% a Right to Work. Mr. Faircloth has promised to help Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill, fight for tougher enforcement of the Supreme Court's ban on the use of forced dues for politics, oppose efforts to require public servants to pay union dues, and crack down on strike violence. However, Mr. Faircloth is under intense pressure from union goons to renounce his Right to Work support. It's vital that you tell Mr. Faircloth not to back down. Please call him at (919) 790-1111 and tell him North Carolinians support his pledge.

Reed Larson

P.S. Senator Terry Sanford must feel the heat from concerned citizens like you to stop voting to force workers to pay union dues. Now, in the face of a tough U.S. Senate battle, is when he is most likely to mend his Washington ways. Please call him today. I NC

US. Senate Questions#: I 23456789 QueSBoPrSI: 123456789 Dlatri0.t 4 Bis&i& 10 Qucstions1: 123456789 David Price-D Ben Neill-D ------Terry Sanford-D ------Vidry Goudie-R T. Cass Ballenger-R Y Y YYY YYYY (800) 722-1992 Lauch Fairclorh-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Dhtriat 5 m&siUk 11 (919) 790-1111 Stephen Neal-D YYYYYYYNY John Stevens-D --* ------Richard Burr-R YYYYYYYYY Charles Taylor-R YYYYYYYYY ' U.S. House of Representatives airtrinc 6 Robin Hod-D J. Howard Coble-R

" '! Eva Claytor,-D ------DistrM 7 ;'.'! ::.., Ted Tyler-R YYYYYYYYY Charlie Rose-D --.~ Robert Anderson-R i!lDMriot 7. ~! Tim Valentine, Jr.-D ------Diatrkrt 8 j: Don Dads-R YYYYYYYYY W. G. Hefner-D YYYYYYY-Y :...... ~ Coy Privette-R YYYYYYYYY L?'D,il€triat 3 H. Martin Lancaster-D Y Y Y Y Y - Y N Y Dbtriet s . Tom!, Pollard-R YYYYYYYNY Row Blake-D J. Alex McMillan-R .~...... -. .~<: ... .

~. !!..~ ,. :-! .i.: .. Survey Questions

2. Do you believe an employee who does not want the "Savices" 6. Will you support amendments eo the Federal Election of a labor Union should have the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to pmhibit the use of compds~ryunion dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees fm plitical causes and candidates opped by union forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you suplwrepeaI of the pmvisions in federal laws which I. Will you oppose socalled "antidouble breasring" legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has, as its primary goal, to forcibly mionbe employes of conskuction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley ACLwhich authorizes sme Right to Work laws? 8. Will you oppose Icgklation to weaken or desmy the Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union political 4. Wouid you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antieatortjon statute? 9. Will you oppose legislation that would punish or requiie: the firing of employees who choose to work during a strike. and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionizarion of federal, state, give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees to pay union dues?

~ ~ ~~ ~~~ Note: The National Righi to Work Cornmitee, of course, endorses no candidates. We are a nonpartisan organization. But we believe that you as a Right to Work supporter are entiriled to know which candidates will support the right of every American to e3111 a living - without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. BACKGROUNDER . The information below is helpful in explaining the quucstions on the SVBY side of this form.

8- 1. A union, under present federal laws, is empowered to the administration of Resident John F. Kennedy. represent and bind all employees in a company‘s bargaining unit - including employees who oppose. the union and don’t 6. Labor unions are the on!y private organization in the U.S. want its “services.” which can legally force individuda ?n pay dues into their This monopoly bargaining power, generally described as treasuries. "exclusive bargaining rights,” deprives employees of their right The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) phibits union M &upin for themselves. Union officials fought for this power officials from giving any of these dues dollars directly to a and refuse to give it up; yet they complain they are “unfairly candidate for federal office. burdened by the Iegal obligarion” to represent nonmembers. At the same time, FECA permits union officials to use Such complaints m intended to pave the way for compelling workers’ compulsory dues dollars for “in-kind” political fmcial suppost from so-called “free riders” for representation spending on g& and services to elect candidates for federal they do not want. offices. These “in-kind” expenditures are in addit& to union PAC The firing of workers who refuse to pay union dues and/or contributions; they are seldom - if ever - documented or fees is explicitly sanctioned by both the National Labor reported to the F&dElection Commission. Act and National Railway Labor Act. Relations the No official stgtiStics for total union “in-kind“ expenditures Section 7 of the NLRA. for example, stipulates that available. But Labar columnist Rim1 estimated that employees shall have “the right to refrain” ffom participating in are Victor rhis so-cd~ed“soft money” amounted to 10 more dnn union activities “except to the extent that such right may be times affected by an agreement requiting membership in a labor what union PACs gave in cash contributions. Based on that organkuion as a condition of employment.“ yardstick, union ‘“softmoney” in 1990 exceeded $350 rnillim The problem of compulsory unionism was created by 7. recent y-, legjbtion has apeen hmu&in congress Congress. It will not be solved until Congress repeals the to automatically impose union Bepresentation upon workers of ._.. existing redd authorizations of compulsory unionism. nonunionized companies which have even the slightest In 21 staies, wage earners - except those covered by the economic links to unionized companies. National Railway Labor Act - are shielded from compulsory Even thmgh the nonunionized and thc unionized cmpanies unionism by Right to Work laws. each perform separate and distinct woslc. the compulsory union The Florida guarantee. is typical of these laws, saying, “The contract would be automatically imposed upon the nco*mion right of persons to work shall not be denied or abridged on workers, without even the show of an election conducted by he acCOUnt of membership or nonmembership in any labor union or National hbaRelations kard to &mine worker suppon. labor orgulizatim.” The “anti-double breasting” %gislationwould also encourage Ihe authority of states to adopt and enforce such laws is Common Situs picketing by pitting union ow- to use Raffimred by Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley amendmene to a dispute with a single subcontraam as an excuse to picket and

the National Labor Relations Act. shut down all the other subcoQeaCtors at a job site. ’ I . 4. Extortion, as a technique, is extremely useful to Union 8. Legislatiom has been hudiiced -My in Congress a0 officials in obtaining such demands as compulsory union shops. loosen the 50-year-old Hatch Act’s mrictio~against man “agency” shops, compulsory hiring halls and irrevocable dues political activity by fed& employees. .. check-off clauses. Federal union officials now wield monopoly bargaining While most crimina( taw is administered at the state and local power over fddemployees. which makes union ofticials the level, some criminal activities (including extortion), which sole conduit for civil Servants in collective bargaining and obmct interstate commerce. have been deemed by Congress to grievance &dons. be so imponant that they should be covered by federal statutes. Cment proposals to weaken the Hatch Act lack explicit the federal law currently union officials have As stands. prohibitions against the use of monopoly bargaining power M unique special immunities from prosecution for threatening U) commit or committing felonies - such as murder, coerce civil servants into supporting federal union officials’ manslaughter, making, arson, aggravated properly desmction, political agenda. explosives or firms offenses, e&. - to obtain collective 9. Legislation has been introduced in Congress that would bargaining demands. prevene employes- fmni hiring permanent replacement workers during a suike. 5. For the past serpsral yws. Congress has been confronted by bills designed to authorize the forced unionization of public The bill’s provisions would also penalize workers who employees at various levels of government choose not to smke by giving preferential, post-strike hiring Several of these proposals are aimed at state, county and privileges to strikers. municipal employees and would nullify existing state laws Since an employer is unlikely to find employees who will which shield public employees from union coercion. work during ;1 violent smke under rhese conditions, employers Other bills would strip posral workers snd other federal would be forced to cave in to every demand by union officials employees of the freedom of choice guaranteed by the Postal - including the demand that workers who refuse to pay union Reorganimtion Act of 1970 and executive orders dating back to dues be fired. To: Read Larson, President National Right to Work Conunittee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite 1500 Springfield, VA 22160

From: -

Dear Reed:

I have: Called the candidates.

Written a personal letter or otherwise contacted the candihtes.

Enclosed a contribution oE:

$25 - $50 $100

- $500 Other

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTMiC. Tho National Rieht Io Work Cnrnrnillcc's Washineton D.C. Headquart- is lmlcd =I our nationii CIDL- t,?lhtAool BrJddock Road. Suite 5M 0 Spnnefield. VA Z160 Tehhone (8W)325-78 ?2 Becau the REED LARSON 8081 BRAODWK ROAD SPRINGFIELD. VlllGlNlA 22160

October 23, 1992

Dear What do Democrat John Rauh and Republican Judd Gregg -- who are both vying to be your next U.S Senator -- have in common? They have both actively opposed Right to Work this year. At least John Rauh has the honesty to admit it. Be endorsed compulsory unionism on his 1992 Right to Work Candidate Survey. But Judd Gregg may be trying to snow you about his past record on Right to Work -- and even about his current position. Of the major candidates for the seat, only Independent Larry Brady has had the guts to consistently stand up against Organized Labor's political machine. Just 8 months ago, Governor Gregg almost single-handedly quashed the New Barnpahire Right to Work bill pending at that time In the New Hampshire House of Representatives. To kill the bill, he twisted tihe arms of dozens of Republican representatives who had previously supported Right to Work. Since Mr. Gregg is favored to win the Senate race, and Big Labor is only a vote or two shy of enaeting its entire political agenda, his track record on Right to Work is of especially grave concern. If Governor Gregg supports compulsory unionism in the Senate as he did this past year as governor, OUP &ion could face economy- paralyzing strikes, and higher inflation and taxes. Way back on July 17, I sent Governor Gregg a Right to Work Candidate Survey to nail down his position on specific pieces of forced-unionism legislation -- Governor Gregg refused to answer. So I sent Judd Gregg a copy of the survey July 31. And you and thousands of New Hampshire citizens deluged his office wiapostcards and phone calls urging him to support Right to Work.

Aliain, hs refused ts respond.

I $enc a second copy of the survey Saptember 10, and r2portsd Mr. Gregg's actions again. You put so much heat on Governor Gregg for hls azroga~crefusal t3 lsvel with you about his Rigkt to Work record, he was to respond. 4000030

Governor Gregg started mailing out copies of his survey answers to our members, who sent them on to me. In an accompanying letter, he implied he returned his survey weeks ago, and claimed he has Zd.W.lG2 supported Right to Work. He even accused E of "grossly misrepresenting" position on forced unionism. Just the opposite. Everything I reported to you about Governor Gregg was 100% correct. According to the Manchester Union Leadel;, the New Hampshire AFL- CIO Political Director has been crowing all year about how Mr. Gregg did the union bosses' dirty work for them by killing the Right to Work bill (H.B. 1432) 211-134. And in 1989 he assured the New Hampshire AFL-CIO convention that he wouwl' 1 that came to his desk. Even on his tardy survey response (which I still have not received from him), Mr. Gregg endorses the root of compulsory unionism -- Big Labor's monopoly bargaining privileges, which force union-boss I' representation" on workers who don't want it. And he also claims he'll support a Nationa.1 Right to Work law. If so, why did he kill a Right to Work law for New Hampshire? Why would he vote to give out-of-state workers the rights ha denied to his own constituents? Very curious indeed. One thing's for sure. If Judd Gregg becomes a U.S. Senator, he needs to remember that his past support for compulsory unionism sparked a firestorm of constituent anger. That's the only way to stop him from doing it again, if he wins his campaign. That's why I'm asking you to take three actions immediately. First, call Governor Gregg at 626-1212 and urge him to publicly apologize for killing your Right to Work law. If you put enough heat on Governor Gregg, you can force him to prove his professed conversion is genuine by opposing forced unionism in the Senate. Then, call John Rauh at 644-5552 and insist he change his anti- Right to Work position. And, don't leave out Independent Larry Brady. He's under major pressure to back off from his support for Right to Work. Call him at 641-5900 and encourage him not to buckle. Sincerely,

Reed Larson

P.S. Also call leading wbernatorial candidate Steve Merrili at 627-9292. He says he supports Right to Work "in principle." Urge him to support it in Dractice next year, if elected. Tell him not to kill the New Hampshire Right to Work bill the way Governor Gregg did this year. U.S. Senate auaatronst: 123456789 Judd Gregg-R* -YYYYYYYY (6031 626-1212 John Rauh-D NNN-NNNNN (603) 595-9353 Larry Brady-I YYYYYYYYY (603) 641-5900

US. House of Representatives Qucotions #: 123 45 67 89 -1 Bill Zeliff-R YYYYYYYYY Bob Preston-D ------msb%at2 Dick Swett-D ------Bill Hatch-R YYYYYYYYY

- - -- , -- * Governor Judd Gregg’s actual survey response has still not been received by the Committee. However, these responses are derived from the survey he is distributing to New Hampshire Right to Work Supporters and is claiming to have sent to us. Candidates for Governor on back

1. Jh you believe an employee who does not want the “services” 6. Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a !abor union should have the tight to refuse 0 accept &at Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidates opposed by union forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you sqpn rqdof the provisions in federal laws which 7. Will YOM oppose so-called “antidouble breasting” legislation authorize compulsory unionism? ahat has, as its primapy goal, to forcibly unionize employees of conmction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley * Act. which authorizes state Right to Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act, which p~otect~federal employees from union political 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextortion slatute? 9. Will you oppose legisla&onthat would punish or require the firing of employees who choose ra work during a strike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal. state, give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees to pay union dues?

Note: The National Right to Work Committee. of course, endorses no candidates. We are a nonparlisan organization. But we believe that you as a Right to Work supponer are entilled 10 know which candidates will support the right of every American to earn B living - without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. 1. Wiil you mpprt enacmtnt of a SW Right to Work law by the New Kmpshirc Legislature?

2. W9 you support the rep4 of monopoly bargaining privileges union officialscurrmtly have over public employees?

aaa aaa &MP Win Newtrm- R Y Y Y SlcveMd-R _-_Calvin warbururn- L .-- M phiuippe Colc st P.O. Box 365 Manchater(n101 Raymond 03077 --_ DcbornhAnrcMn-D B B B MmmLuse-L YVY RR 1. BQX42 mad 03777 Windharn*lo 0308 Rod _-- Narman D'Amours- D _-- 134 chase way Mmhster 03104 - - - NedHelms-D NNN P.O. Box 1780 Mamhesrcr03105 To: Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee BO01 Braddock Road, SuLte t500 Sptingfield, VA 22160

From:

Dear Reed:

I have:

Called the candidates.

Written a personal letter or otherwise contacted the candidates.

Enclosed a contribution of:

- $25 $50 $100

$500 Other

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC. The Nahcn3l RIJII lo Work Committees Washmeton DC. Hd;dsuartm19 lnaled at our nation's ad- tal at 8001 Bdd& Road. Swte Hy) * Sonng&JAU 22160 * Mmhonc (WI37C.7892. &U%E!k IRs has m-ocnized MlTwC ss bxexemit undn IRC Sec Xll(cl(4). which wrmib imlirnWd lobbnng. mnmbuhnns are not bxdedumhle ~~ch=ntableconmbutions. REEDLARSON 8001 BRADDOCK ROAD SPRINGFIELD. VtRGlNlA 22160

October 23, 1992

I'm writing you a personal letter today because I'm very concerned about how Senator Harry Reid will vote on compulsory- unionism legislation if Nevadans vote Urn another term. If Senator Reid continues to vote to hand compulsory- unionism powers to Big Labor, Nevada will suffer. And so will the entire nation. Until now, Senator Reid has voteci with the union hierarchy and against individual freedom for workers and small businesses almost every time.

Harry Reid is one of Big Labor's most reliable water carriers in the Senate. This past June, Mr. Reid helped Tad Kennedy try to ram his Pushbutton Strike bill (H.R. 5/S. 55) through the Senate. The Strike bill failed wiu1 only one vote to spare.

And in 1990, Mr. Reid voted twice to allow government union chieftains to declare open season on harassing 2.9 million federal employees and thousands of U.S. taxpayers to support the union political machine by repealing the Hatch Act. Big Labor came just two votes shy of corralling enough senators to over- ride President Bush's veto and gut the 53-year-old law. Mr. Reid's vote in the Senate could put Big Labor over the top on these and countless other union-boss power grabs.

Organized Labor is within a whisker of total control over our federal government. If the union political machine sweeps Nevada and just two other Senate seats into Big Labor's vote column (and possibly the White House as well), Mr. Reid could cast the key Senate vote to enact the entire union-boss political agenda into law.

Ee could vota to destroy Nevada's cherished Riqht to Work law by abolishing Section l.l(b) of the Taft-Tiartley Act, enact the Pusiicutton Strike bill, repeal the Hatch Act, and force all goverment employees t3 pay union dues to swell 3ig Labor's polizical and orsanizing coffers.

mAaz's why I've urged you to inundate Senatcr Reid 'dit3 phcr.a calls, lsttzrs and postcards. Thocsands cf angry Nevada citi2er.s are urgin~him to support Right to Nor?<. 5154725

But Senator Reid continues to stonewall. Your protests seem to be falling on deaf ears. Why is Harry Reid ignoring you and the rest of the huge majority of Nevada citizens who oppose compulsory unionism? Union operatives have stuffed $407,000 into his campaigns for the Senate. And that cash is only the tip of the iceberg. Union political pros have probably dumped ten times that into Senator Reid's campaigns in the form of "soft money" -- partisan get-out- the-vote drives, phone banks, and paid "volunteers. So while Senator Reid is refusing to tell Right to Work supporters his position on forced unionism, union lobbyists know he'll vote any way they say. It's a simple (if sleazy) deal. He votes their way -- they bankroll his campaigns with forced-union dues stolen from American workers. Please call Senator Reid at (702) 598-1992 and urge him to repudiate his support for forced unionism. Only howls and screams can make Senator Reid renounce his cozy relationship with Big Labor. Tell Senator Reid you won't stand for his political dirty pool of taking Big Labor backroom payoffs -- while he stonewslls Nevada citizens. Tell him he's not fooling anvbody, and urge him to stop voting to force workers to pay union dues. On the other hand, Mr. Reid's opponent, Demar Dahl, respond to his survey 100% Right to Work. Mr. Dahl has promised to help stQP_ Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill, fight for tougher enforcement of the Supreme Court's ban on the use of forced dues for politics, oppose efforts to require public servants ta pay union dues, and crack down on strike violence. However, Mr. Dahl is under intense pressure from union goons to renounce his Right to Work support. It's vital that you tell Mr. Dahl not to back down. Please call him at (702) 737-8800 and tell him Nevada citizens support his pledge.

Reed Larson

I.S. Senator Harry Reid must feel the heat from concerned citizens like you to stop voting to force workers to pay union dues. Now, in the face of a tough U.S. Senate battle, is when he is most likely to mend his Washington ways. Please call him today. NV e

US. Senate auestions%: I 23456789 Harry Reid-0 ------(702) 598-1992 Oemar Oahl-R YYYYYYYYY (702) 737-8800 U.S. House of Representatives Ouwtionrrr: 123456789 D-M 1 .... is J. Coy Pettyjohn-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y i' . .. (702) 259-8683 James Bilbray-0 _----I--- .. ... (702) 369-8155 -.~...... ?! DMrM 4 Pete Sferriizza-0 ------(702) 324-7383 Barbara Vucanovich-R Y YYYYYYYY

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the "Services" 6. Will you support amendments to the Federal Election ofalaborunionshouldhavetherighttorehrsetoaecept~t Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory m-on dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fee$ fax politid causes and candidates opposed by union forces him to accept? membas? 2. Will you support r@ of the provisions in fa&laws which 7. Wiil YOU 0- so-called ''antidouble breasthg'' legblation mlhorize compulsoty unionism? thaf has, as its primaty goal, to forcibly unionize employees of construction commies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14@) of the Taft-Wey Act. which authorizes state Right to Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union political

4. Woeid YOU SUUDO~leaislation to end the sDecial immuniw coercion?...~~~~~~ union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextortion statute? 9. Will you oppose legislation that would punish or require the I firing of employees who choose to work during a mike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state, give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county arid municipal employees? refuse to force their employees to pay union dues'?

Note: The National Right to Work Committee, of course, endorses no candidates. We ate a nonpartisan organbtion. But we believe that you as a Right to Work supporter are entided Io know which candidates will suppart the right of every American LO earn a living - without having to pay urion bosses for the privilege. ACKGROWEW The information below is helpful in explaining the questions on the reverse side of this form. I A union, under present federal laws, is empowered to the administration of President John F. Kennedy. represent and bind all employees in a company’s bargaining unit - including employees who oppose the union and don’t 6. Labor unions are the only private organization in the US. ww its “services.” which can legally force individuals to pay dues into their This monopoly bargaining power, generally described as treasuries. “exclusive bargaining rights;” deprives employees of their right The Federal Election Campaip Act (YEA) prohibits union to bargain for themselves. Union officials fought for this power officials from giving any of these dues dollars directly to a and refuse to give it up: yet they complain they are “unfairly candidate for federal office. burdcned by the legal obligation” to represent nonmembers. At the same time, FECA permits union officials to use Such complaints are intended to pave the way for compelling workers’ compulsory dues dollars for “in-kind” political financial support from so-called “free riders” for representarion spending on goods and services to elect candidates for federal Lhey do not want offices. These “in-kind” expenditures are ir. zddition to union PAC me figof workers who refuse to pay union dues and/or contributions; they are seldom - if ever - docuncnted or fees is explicitly sanctioned by both the National Labor repomd to !he Fed& Election Commission. Relations Act and the National Railway Labor Act No official swistics for union “in-kind“ expenditures Section 7 of the NLRA, for example, stipulates that total available. But columnist Riesel estimated that employees shall have ”the right to refrain“ from participating are Labor Victor in this so-called “soft money” amounted to 10 times more than union activities ”except to the extent that such right may be affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor what union PACs gave in cash confributions. Based on that organization as a condition of employment.“ yardstick, union “soft money” in 1990 exceeded $350 million. The problem of compulsory unionism was created by 7. h recent years, legislation has been inwduced in Congress Congress. It will not be solved until Congress repeals the to automatically impose union representation upon workem of existing federal authorizations of compulsory unionism. nonunionized companies which have even the slightest In 21 states. wage eamers - except those covered by the economic linlrs to unionized companies. National Railway Labor Act - are shielded from compulsory Even though tk nonunionized and the unionized cornparues unionism by Right to Work laws. each perform sqarate and distinct work, &e Cmpdwey union Ihe Florida guarantee is typical of these laws, saying. “The contract would be automatically imposed upon the.nonunion right of persons to work shall not be denied or abridged on worken, without even the show of an election conducted by the account of membership or nonmembership in any labor union or National Labor Relations Boarca to &&mine wo&er support.--.- labor organization.” The “anti-double breashg” legislation wddalso ehcolvdge The authority of states to adopt and enforce such laws is Common situs picketing by permitting union organken 1Q we mfhned by Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley amendments to a dispute with a sin& subconi.mctor as an excuse to picket and Relations: Act. ~. the National Ihx shut down all the ohrsubeontractors ata job de. . . ’ ., , . Extortion, as a technique, is extremely useful to union 8. Legislation has been inhodueed repeatedly in Congress to officials in obtaining such demands as compulsory union shops, loosen the 50-year-old Hatch Act’s restrictions against partkm , ... “agency” shops, compulsory hiring halls and irrevocable dues political activity by Fed& employees. .~.. .,... 4 chedr-off clauses. Federal union officials now wield monopoly bargaining While most criminal law is administered at the state and local power over fdedemployees. which makes union’offki+qthe level, some criminal activities Gncluding extortion). which sole conduit for civil servants in collective bargaining and obstruct interstate commerce, have been deemed by Congress to grievance situations. be so important that they should be covered by federal statutes. Current proposals to weaken the &tch Act lack Explicit As the federal law currently stands, union officials have prohibitions against the of.monopoly bargnining power unique special immunities from prosecution for tlhreatening to cnse to commit or committing felonies - such as murder, coerce civil servants into supporting federal union officials’ manslaughkr, maiming, arson, aggravated property desmction. plitid agenda. explosives or firearms offenses, etc. - to obtain collective 9. Legislation has been introduced in Congress that would bargaining demands. prevent employers from hiring permanent replacement workers For the past several years, Congress has been confronted by during a strike. bills designed to authorize the forced unionization of public The bill’s provisions would also penalize workers who employees at various levels of government. choose not to strike by giving preferential, post-suike hiring Sevenl of these pmposak are aimed at state. county and privileges to strikers. municipal employees and would nullify existing state laws Since an employer is unlikely to find empbyws who will which shield public employees from union coercion. work during a violent smke under these conditions, employers Other bills would strip postal workers and other federal would be forced to cave in to every demand by union officials employees of the freedom of choice guaranteed by the Postal - including the demand that workers who refuse to pay union Reorganization Act of 1970 and executive orders dating back to dues be fired. To: Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite +SO0 Springfield, VA 22160

From:

Dear Reed:

I have: - Called the candidates. Written a personal letter or otherwise contacted the candidates.

Enclosed a contribution of:

$500 - Other

Please make check payable and return to: NRPWC. The National Rilt to Work Camrnitte's Washineton D.C. Headauarters is looted at our nation's cmi- tal at 8001 Braddock Road. Suite 500 * Sorinefield. VA U160 Telephone (800)3257892. Because the IRS has rccoanized NRTWC as tax exempt under IRC Ser 5014)(4).which mitsunlimited Iobbvine contributions are not tax deductible ascharitableconhibutions REEDLARSON 8001 BRADDOCKROAD SPRINGFIELD.VIRGINIA 22160

October 23, 1992

Dear I'm writing you a personal letter today because I'm very concerned about how Senator Ernest "Fritz" Hollings will vote on compulsory-unionism legislation if South Carolinians vote him another tern. If Senator Hollings continues to vote to hand compulsory- unionism powers to Big Labor, South Carolina will suffer. And so will the entise nation. Until now, Senator Hollings has voted with the union hierarchy and against individual freedom for workers and small businesses almost avery time. Senator Hollings has not exactly been a Right to Work advocate in the Senate. Just recently, he voted to block enforcement of the 1988 Supreme Court && ban on the use of forced dues for politics. And in 1990, Mr. Hollings voted twice to allow government union chieftains to declare open season on harassing 2.9 million federal employees and thousands of U.S. taxpayers to support the union political machine by repealing the Hatch Act. Big Labor came just two votes shy of corralling enough senators to override President Bush's veto and gut the 53-year-Old law. Mr. Hollings' vote in the Senate could put Big Labor aver the top on these and countless other union-boss power qrabs. Organized Labor is within a whisker of total control over our federal government. If the union political machine sweeps South Carolina and just two other Senate seats into Big Labor's vote column (and possibly the White House as well), Mr. Hollings could cast the hey Senate vote to enact the entire union-boss politica1,agendainto law.

He could voce t3 destroy South Carolina's cherished Riqnt to Work law by abolishing Section l4(b) of the Taft-Zartlay Act, enact the Pushbutton Strike bill, repeal the Batch Act, and forca all government employees to pay union clues to swell Big Labor's political and organizing coffers.

That's why I've xrged you ts inundate Sesator Eoliings wit2 phcr-e calls, 1et:ars and postcards. Thousands of angry Scut:? Carolina citizens ar2 urging him to support Riqht to Work. 6061830

But Senator Hollings continues to stonewall. Your protests seem to be falling on deaf ears. Why is Ernest Hollings ignoring you and the rest of the huge majority of South Carolina citizens who oppose compulsory unionism? Union operatives have stuffed $209,000 into his campaigns for the Senate. And that cash is only the tip of the iceberg. Union political pros have probably dumped ten times that into Senator Hollings' campaigns in the form of "soft money" -- partisan get- out-the-vote drives, phone banks, and paid "volunteers.'' So while Senator Hollings is refusing to tell Right to Work supporters his position on forced unionism, union lobbyists know he'll vote any way they say. It's a simple (if sleazy) deal. He votes their way -- they bankroll his campaigns with forced-union dues stolen from American workers. Please call Senator Hollings sow at (803) 723-0700 and urge him to repudiate his support for forced unionism. Only howls and screams can make Senator Hollings renounce his cozy relationship with Big Labor. Tell Senator Hollings you won't stand for his political dirty pool of taking Big Labor backroom payoffs -- while he stonewalls South Carolina citizens. Tell him he's not fooling, anvbodv, and urge him to stop voting to force workers to pay union dues. On the other hand, Mr. Hollings' opponent, Tommy Bartnett, respond to his survey 100% & Right to Work. Mr. Hartnett has promised to help stop Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill, fight for tougher enforcement of the Supreme Court's ban on the use of forced dues for politics, oppose efforts to require public sewants to pay union dues, and crack down on strike violence. However, Mr. Hartnett is under intense pressure from union goons to renounce his Right to Work support. It's vital that you tell Mr. Hartnett not to back down. Please call him at (803) 720-8860 and tell him South Carolinians support his pledge.

Reed Larson P.S. Senator Ernest Hollings must feel the heat from concerned citizens like you to stop voting to force workers to pay union dues. Now, in the face of a tough V.S. Senate battle, is when he is most likely to mend his Washington ways. Please call him today. sc FC c

US. Senate Questions#: 123456789 V3atriat 2 Questions#: 123456789 Floyd Spence-R YYYYYYY-Y Fritz Hollings-D ------(803) 254-5120 :803) 327-1114 (803) 723-0700 lilliam Home-R YYYYY-YYY Tomy Hartnett-R YYYYYYYYY DiptrM 3 :803) 494-2641 (803) 720-8860 Jams Bland-R YYYYYYYYY (803) 641-1408 li.triat 6 US. HOWBof Representatiwes Butler Derrick-D YYY-YNY-Y rim Clyburn-D ------929-0208 ~ (8031 225-5301 :803) I ::+. Questions#: 125456789 fohn Chase-R Yyyyyyyrr .L:’cUstriQ 1 Virtriat 4 ,803) 669-8787 ;e pill Oberst-D -- , ... .. ------Liz Patterson-D ,::zi (8031 527-4946 (803) 582-3650 .:-‘Arthur .. Ravenel, Jr.-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Bob Inglis-R i (803) 722-0174 (8031 242-6440

....~ ..?...... ~. . :I

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the “Sercsices” Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory Union dues union as his exclusive represenfalive, which federal law now and fees fm political causes mol canndidam opposed by union forces him lo accept? memb? 2. Will you supprt repeal of the provisions in federa( laws which WjU you oppose soczlued “anti-buble bming” fegislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has, as is primary gd. to forcibly unionize m.p!oyes of consrmctiar. sompanies? 3. Do you favor peservation of Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley Act, which authorizes smRight to Work laws? Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union political 4. Would you suppan legislation to end the special immunity ccwion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextortion statute? Will you oppose legislation ^btwould punish or require the king of employees who choose to work during a s&e. and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state. give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees to pay union dues?

Note: The Nation& Right to Work Committee, of course, endorses no randidabx. We aea nonpanisan organization. But we believe that you as a Right to Work supparrcr are entided to know which candidates will support the right of every American to ema living - without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. The information below is helpful in explaining the questions on the revaxside of hiis form.

~ A union. under present federal laws, is empowered to headministration of President John F. Kennedy. represent and bind all employees in a company’s bargaining unions are the only private organi7ation in the U.S. unit - including employees who oppose the union and don’t 6. Labor want its “sewices.” which can legally force individuals to pay dues into their This monopoly bargaining power, generally described as ueasuries. “exclusive bargaining rights,” deprivps employees of their right The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) prohibits union to bargain for themselves. Union officials fought for this power officials from giving any of these dues dollars directly to a and refuse 60 give it up; yet they complain they are “unfairly candidate for federal office. burdened by the legal obligation” to represent nonmembers. At the same time, FECA permits union officials tC use Such complaints are intended to pave the way for compelling workers’ compulsory dues dollars for “iri-kind” political fmcial support fhom so-called “free riders” for represenwon spending on goods and services to elect candidates for federal they do not want. offices, ?hese “in-hid” expenditures are in addition to union PAC The f~ngof workers who refuse to pay union dues and/or contributions; they are seldom - if ever documented or fees is explicitly sanctioned by both the National Labor - reported t~ the Federal Election Commission. Relations Act and the National Railway Labor Act. No official statistics for union “in-kind” expenditures Section 7 the NLRA, for example, stipulates that total of available. But Labor columnist Eesel estimated that employees shall have “the right to refrain” from participating in are Victor this so-called “soft money” mounted to 10 times more than union activities “except to the extent that such right may be what union PACs gave in cash contributions. Bawl that affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor on organization as a condition of employment.” yardstick. union “soft money” in 1990 excded $3.50 million. The problem of compulsory unionism was created by 7. In recent ym.legislation has been introduced in Congress Congress. It will not be solved until Congress repeals the to aulomaticaUy impose union repmentation upon workers of existing federal authorizations of compulsory unionism. nonunionized companies which have even the slightest In 21 states, wage earners - except those covered by the economic links to unionized companies. National Railway Labor Act - are shielded from compulsory Even though the nonunionized and the unionized companies unionism by Right to Work laws. each perform separate and distinct wsrlr, the compulsory mkra The Florida guarantee is typical of these laws, saying. ‘The contract would be automatically imposed upon the nonunion right of persons to work shall not be denied or abridged on workers. without even the show of an election conducted by the account of membership or nonmembership in any labor union or Nationai LabRelations Board to determine worker support labor organization.” The “anti-double bating” legislation would also wcourage. The authority of states to adopt and enforce such laws is Common Situs picketing by permitting union organizers to use reafiimed by Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley amendments to a dispute with a single subconmutar its an excuse U, picket and the National Labor Relations Act. shut dovm all the other subconuactors at a job sine. Extortion, as a technique, is enaemely useful to union 8. Legislation has been introduced repeatedly in Congre.ss to o&%s in obtaining such demands as compulsory union shops, loosen the .5(ryear43!5 Hatch Act’s wtrictions against partisan “agency“ shops, compulsory hiring halls and irrevocable dues political activity by fdedemployees. ., . chedc-off clauses. Federal union officials now wield monopoly bargaining While most criminal law is administered at the state and local power ova fedd employees. which inaka union officials the level, some criminal activities (including extortion). which sole conduit for civil Servants in collective bargaining and obstruct interstate commerce, have been deemed by Congress to grievancx situations. be so important that they should be covered by federal statutes. Current proposals to weaken the Hatch Act lack explicit As the federal law currently stands, union officials have prohibitions against the use of monopoly bargaining power to unique special immunities from prosecution for threatening to coerce civil servanis supporting federal uaion officials’ commit or committing felonies - such as murder, into manslaughter, maiming, arson, aggravated property destruction, political agenda. explosives or firearms offenses, etc. - 60 obtain collective 9. Legislation has been introduced in Congress that would bargaining demands. prevent employers from hiring permanent replacement workers For the past several years. Congress has been confronted by during a strike. bills designed to authorize the forced unionization of public Tine bill’s provisions would also penalize workers who employees at various levels of government. choose not to smke by giving preferential, post-strike hiring Several of these proposals are aimed at state, county and privileges to smkers. municipal employees and would nullify existing state laws Since an employer is unliely to find employees who will which shield public employees from union coercion. work during a violent strike under these conditions, employers Other bills would strip postal workers and other federal would be forced to cave in to every demand by union officials employees of the freedom of choice guaranteed by the Postal - including the demand that workers who refuse to pay union Reorganiw’jon Act of 1970 and executive orders dating back to dues be fired. To: Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Codttee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite 8500 Springfield, VA 22160

From:

Dear Reed:

I have - Called he candidates. - Written a personal letter or otherwise . contacted the candidates. - Enclosed a contribution of:

___ $25 - $50 $100

$500 ___ Other

Please make checks pqable and return to: NRWC. Ths Nztional Rieht Io Work Cornmitlfds Washiicton D.C. Headauarters is located at our nation's u&

mnmbuhons arenot tax dcdu%ble a5 chantable contnbutions. October 23, i992

Dear Member: I'm writing you a personal letter today because I'm very concerned about how Congressman Wayne Owens will vote on compulsory-unionism legislation if he becomes Utah's next U.S. Senator. If, as a U.S. Senator, Wayne Owens continues to vote to hand compulsory-unionism powers to Big Labor, Utah will suffer. And so will the entire nation. Until now, Consressman Owens has voted with the union hierarchy and against individual freedom for workers and small businesses almost every time. As the second biggest recipient of union-boss political cash in the entire U.S. House of Representatives, Congressman Owens helped pass Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill (H.R. 5/S. 55). The Strike bill failed with only one vote to spare in the Senate. And in 1990, Mr. Owens voted twice in the House to allow government union chieftains to declare open season on harassing 2.9 million federal employees and thousands of U.S. taxpayers to support the union political machine by repealing the Ratch Act. Big Labor came just two votes shy of corralling enough senators to override President Bush's veto and gut the 53-year-old law.

Mr. Owens's vote in the Senate could put Big. Labor over the ' top on these and countless other union-boss power grabs. Organized Labor is within a whisker of total control over our federal governme2t. If the union political machine sweeps Utah and just t%o other Senate seats into Big Labor's vote .column (and possibly the,WhiteHouse as well), Nr. Owens could cast'the key Senate vote to enact the entire.. union:tos,S political acjenka 'iato law. ..

--A= -TO~=53 destroy Riqht Woik 13~;~ . .. czuld. Utah'~cherished t~ by aim~:3~i2~Sasti.~ i4<3! ol the Taft-:iartlsy Act, -Inact %=e 3usihbutt3n Stri:rt bill, ,-%?ea1 k\e %tch Act, and Er-ce all scve,xnent emplsvees ~3 pay union cues ts swell 3ig hkor'; ,GAL"&L k-cal anC sr5anizinq coffars. .. . That'j ,,ii::i C'vt ti=.;& :rcu tJ i.?Uaddte COF.gZ?SXClZ CVv'22S ..d:L? ?i?cno calls, latc2rs.. aT.6 pcstcards. Thousaxis oE aA.i.;:y 5'tJ1? citt=tns +:B urr;ing xx =a su;igorz 'iight to Wczk...... __I,.

seen to be faliinr; or. %

Xh:; is Way-e 2.ziess ignoring you and t:?e 3: thc kcqe .. rssz sa:ozity of L'tah cir-zens who oppose ccmpulaory xiioniam? ._ uzicn oper.3zi-7~3have stuffed 53C3, COO inT.3 his campai':r.a Zar -,ne U.S. Zouse zinc now the Senate.

.\nc! thaz casn is mil7 the tip of the iceberg. Unior. pclizical pr-; ha7;e czobably dumped ten times thaz into Congressman svens's campaigns in the form of "soft money" -- ?artisan qet-out-ti?e-vote drives, phone banks, ana full-time gaid "voluntzers. 'I

So while Corgressman Owens is refusing to teii Right to Work supporters his posiclon cn forced unionism, union lobbyists know he'll vote any way they say. it's a simpla (if sleazy) arrangemefit. Iis votss their way -- they banltroii his congressional and senate campaigns with forced-union dues stolen from American workers.

Please caLL Cscgressman Cwens at (801) 486-1992 and urge hix to repudiate his support for forced unionism. Only howls and screams caz maks Congressman Owens renoiince his cozy relationship wit;? Sic; Labor.

Tell Ccngrossaan Cwens you won't stand for his political circy pool of falricg 3ig Labor backroom payoffs -- while he stonewalls Utah citizens. Tell him he's not fooling i?nvbodrr, and urge him to stop voting to force workers to pay union dues.

On t3.e other haxd, Nr. Owen's opponent, Bob Zennett, respond to his survey 100% Right to Work. Mr. 3ennett has promised to help stoD TeG Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill, fight for tougher enforcement of the Supreme Court's ban or, the use of forced dues for politics, oppcse effor-is ts rquira public servants to pay ur,ion dues, a.zd crack down on strike violence.

ncwever,.- Nr. 3enn5tt is under intense pressure from uzicn goons t3 renourxe his ?..-h--5--L to Work support. It's vital that till X:. 3erxett noz ;D back down. ?lease call him at (go:) 523.- 9534 azl tell hlrn ::IZ seople of Utah supporz 1213 alidge. l!-

j U.S. Senate 0uesfions;Y: 123456785 ;Jape '>dens-3 ------1801) 486-139. 3o&erc i?ennec2-3 < '! 'I 'i '! '! .< y y I1 !3c:) 521-3524

US. House of Representatives Questions#: 123456789 DM=ict 1 James Ransen-?I .,Y,,".,, . . . . .,.,- . Y. (801) 45i-52!8 ;ion Uoic-0 (801) 544-9963

Key: Y =Yes N =NQ - =NoResponse

Survey Questions

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the "services" 6. Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory anion dues union as his exclusive represenutive, which fedenl law now and fees for plirid causes and candidates opposed by union forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in fedenl hws which 7. Will you oppose so-called "anti-double breasting" legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has, as its primary goal. to forcibly unionize employees of construction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14@) OF rhc Taft-Hdey Aci which authorizes sute Right to Work laws'? 3. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or desuoy the Hatch .Act, which protects federal employees from union politic31 4. Would you support legislation to end he special immunit:i coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under !hc federal anti-2xtonion surute?

5. Will you oppose the forced unionizirion -.I' iederai. stxt. county and municipal tmployees': BACKGROUNDER fnc inibrmation below is helpful in explmninq I~C questions on the reversc side of 911sform.

~ ! .\ mion, unde: prc:;snt fccieral !aws. is empowered to ihc administration ?rrcsidcnt John i xprcsent and bind AI cmployces In 2 company’s bargaining b. Lbor ilnions m the only private organi;.;luon in !.he US. unit - including smplovcs ,who .~pposcthe anion and don‘t ‘want its “services.” wntch anlegally forc:: individuals 10 pay dues into their This monopoiv mrgainins power, generally described as trc~sunes. “exclusive bargaining ngh&.” deprives cmployees of their right The Fcdcral Elcction Cmpagn Act (FECA) prohibirs union (0 bargain for themselves. Union oificials fought for this power officials from giving any of thcse dim dollars directly to 3 and refuse 10 give it up; yet they ;omplain they =e “unfairly cmdidate for federal office. burdened by the legal obligation” to represent nonmembers. A1 the same time, FECA permits union officials to use Such complainrs are inccnded io pave the way for compelling workers’ compulsory dues dollars for “in-kind” political financial support from so-called “frc:: riders” for representation spending on goods adservices to elect candidates for federal .. .. they do not want. offices. ~..l.. I :: lhesc “in-kind expenditures are in addition to union PAC .$j The fing of workers who refuse to pay union dues and/or contributions; they are seldom - if ever - documented or iii. fees is explicitly sanctioned by both the National Labor reported to the Federal Election Commission. LJ.~. .. Relations Act and I~CNational ~i~wayLabor ACL .. . No official statisucs for tomi union “in-kind“ expenditures i’! Section 7 of the NLRA. for example, stipulates that are available. But Labor columnist Victor Riesel estimated [hat .j employees shall have “the right 10 refrain” frnm p3rticipaling in - this so-called “soft money” amounted to IO times more than .. union activities “except to the extent that such nght may be .. what union PACs gave in cash contributions. Based on that :/..__ aifected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor L. yardstick, union “soft money” in 1990 exceeded $350 million. . .. organization 3s a condition of employment.” ..ji i The problem of compulsory unionism was created by 7. In recent years, legislation has been introduced in Congress Congress. 11 will not be solved until Congress repeals the to aummatically impose union representation upon workers of existing federal authorizations of compulsory unionism. nonunionized companies which have even the slightest In 21 states. wage earners - except those. covered by he economic links to unionized companies. National Railway Labor Act - are shielded from compulsory Even though he nonunionized and the unionized companies unionism by Right to Work laws. each perfomi separate and distinct work, the compulsory union The Florida glurantee is typicd of these laws. saying. “The contract would be automatically imposed upon the nonunion right of persons to work shall not be denied or abridged on workers, without even the show of an election conducted by the account of membership or nonmembership in any labor union or National Labor Relations Board to determine worker support. labor organization.” The “anti-double breasting” legislation would also encourage The authority of states to adopt and enforce such laws is Common Situs picketing by permitting union organizers to use rdfmed by Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley amendments to a dispute with a single subconmctor as an excuse to picket and the National Labor Relations Act. shut down all the other subcontractors at a job site. Extortion. as a technique, is extremely useful to union 8. Legislation has been introduced repeatedly in Congress 10 officials in obtaining such demands 3s compulsory union shops, lwsen the 50-ym-old Hatch Act’s restrictions against partisan “agency” shops, compulsory hiring halls and irrevocable dues political activity by federal employees. check-off clauses. Federal union officials now wield monopoly bargaining While most criminal law is administered at the slate and lccal power over federal employees, which makes union oEficials the level. some criminal activities (including extortion). which sole conduit for civil servants in collec~ivebargaining and obsnuct interslate commerce, have been deemed by Congress to grievance situations. be so imponant that they should be covered by federal smtutes. Current proposals to weaken the Hatch Act lack explicit As the federal Law currently smnds. union officials have prohibitions against the use of monopoly bargaining power 10 unique special immunities from prosecution for threatening 10 commit or committing felonies - such as murder. coerce civil servants into supporting federal union officials’ manslaughler, maiming. arson, 3gg3vated property desauction, political agenda. explosives or firexms offenses. stc. -- to obtain collective 3 . Lcgislation has been introduced in Congress that would bargaining demands. prevent cmp1oye:s from hiring permanent replacement workers For the past several years. Congress has bem confronted by duni~sa stxikc. bills designed ;o uthorizc ;he fcrced mionintion oi guhiic The bill’s provisions would also penaliz: worker:; who smployces at *iarious lcvels oiZovcrnmcnt. Aose not IO stxikc by giving prefc:cntial, post-tuike !wins Several ai rhese ?rop:.sais arc aimed it ;we. county 2nd jrivilcgcs D sdkcrs. municipal raployees and would 3uilii:i -xisting iute :aws Sincz an .,mpioyer is unlikely IO find :mpioycts uno xtil ,vnich .ihie!d ydic nciovc-s from .anon :x:c:t)n. work during -J siioient ;trike under these conditions. :m Other 511s -uouiu xr:p ysui ‘vorscs inti :)thcr fcde:d would :x iorcxi ‘0 caw :n :o ~er,hnand jy mion .)I IC:LIJS ::II~; - :nc!utiin< :ne :emand ‘.hat wIrkcrs .who -c

From:

Dear Reed:

I have:

Called the candidates.

Written a personal letter or otherwise contacted the candidates.

Enclosed a contribution of:

$25 $50 $100

$500 Other

Reed Larson BM)1 Braddd Road. Suile SOLl Springfield. Virginia 22160

October 26, 1992 Dear Wisconsin Member: I'm writing you today because I'm very concerned about how State Senator Russell Feingold will vote on compulsozy-unionism legislation if he becomes Wisconsin's next U.S. Senator. Xf. as a U.S. S-es to had m oowers to Bi9 LabQ& Wiscpngu)' Will sw. And so will the entire nation. As a Wisconsin State Senator for 10 years, Mr. Feingold has voted with the union hierarchy and against individual freedom for workers and small businesses every time. One of Big Labor's most reliable water carriers, Mr. Feingold sponsored and rammed through the Wisconsin Senate a Pushbutton Strike bill "clone" (S.B. 70) which, like U.S. Senator Ted Kennedy's federal bill, would force employers to punish or even fire workers who resist union-boss strike orders. If Governor Tormny Thompson had not heeded Right to Work advocates' pleas to veto this bill, it would have incited violent atrikee. increased Biu Labor's Bower to force workers to D~Y union dues, and drive; more businesses and good jobs out of-the Badger State. State Senator Feingold hao also actively pushed for a bill (S.B. 2621 to strip University of Wisconsin employees of the right to bargain for themeelves over their wages and benefits by forcing them to accept union 'representation: Handing faculty union czars this monopoly bargaining privilege would bring the inflated costs, declining quality and bloated bureaucracy I- common in Wisconsin's union-boss ruled primary and secondary schools -- to higher education. F-:: Mr- F-:: GadlUs-. GadlUs-. Organized Labor is within a whisker of total control over our federal government. If the union political machine sweeps Wiscollsin and just two other U.9. Senate Beats into Big Labor's camp (and possibly the white House ao well), Mr. Feingold could cast the key vote to enact the entire union-boss political agenda into law. He could vote to destroy all Right to Work laws by abolishing Section 141b) of the Taft-Hartley Act, enact the Pushbutton Strike bill, repeal the Hatch Act, and force all government employees to pay union dues to swell Big Labor's political and organizing coffers. That's why I've already asked you to inundate Mr. Feingold with phone calls, letter9 and postcards. Thousands of angry Wisconsin citizens are now urging him to support Right to Work. But State Senator Feingold continues to stonewall. You+ protests seem to be falling on deaf ears. Why is Russell Peingold ignoring you and the rest of the huge majority of Wisconsin citizens who oppose compulsory unionism? Maybe it's because Russell Feingold is up to his ears in union forced-dues 'in-kind" campaign favors. Paul Gigot of the respected Wall Street Jour& points out Chat Mr. Peingold is

__ I- strongly backed by the big-time, big-money Wisconsin Education Association Council [WEAC) teacher union. WEAC. a subsidiary of the National Education Association INEA) union, has dumped hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of hidden "soft" money into Mr. Feingold's campaign in the form of partisan get-out-the-votedrives, phone banks, and full-time, paid 'volunteers. 'I WEAC has even lent one of its former officers, Morris Andrews, to Mr. Feinyold as his campaign chairman. Until recently, Andrews was the top boss of WEAC and is considered the heaviest of the heavyweight special interest lobbyists in Madison. Now he's there making certain Big Labor gains control of another Senator. So while Mr. Feingold is refusing to tell Right to Work supporters his position on forced unionism, union lobbyists know he'll vote any way they say. It's a simple (if sleazy) arranqement. He votes their way -- they bankroll his State Legislative and U.S. Senate campaigns with forced-union dues stolen from American workers, Please call State Senator Russell FeinsoXd now at (6081 251- 7800 and urge him to rewudiate his suwwort f OP forced. unionism. Only ~Q!X protests can make Mr. Feingold renounce his cozy relationship with Big Labor. Tell State Senator Feingold you won't stand for his political dirty pool of taking Big Labor backroom payoffs -- while he stonewalls Wisconsin citizens. Tell him he's not fooling 9- , and urge him to stop voting to force workers to pay union dues. Qn< th er h R K Bid reso0nd to h is survey cf- rally in favor of Risht to Work and a1most alwavs voted for Riaht to Work in the U.S. Senae. Mr. Kasten has voted to Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill, fought for tougher enforcement of the Supreme Court's ban on the use of forced dues for politics, opposed efforts to require public servants to pay union dues, and supported a crackdown on strike violence. Unfortunately, Senator Kasten did vote to gut the Hatch Act. This bill would have allowed union officials to browbeat the 2.9 million federal employees and thousands of U.S. taxpayers into supporting the union political machine. In 1991, Big Labor came just two votes shy of corralling enough senators to override President Bush's veto and gut the 53-year-oldlaw. Now union czars are pressuring Mr. Kasten intensely to renounce all support for the Right to Work. It's vital that you urge Mr. Kasten to reconsider his support for Hatch Act repeal. please call him at (414) 354-100Q and tell him the w eoule of Wisconsin QJdBI)ozt his dedse on au pther Risht t o Work issuea.

P.S. State Senator Russell Feingold must feel the heat from concerned citizens like you 'eo stop voting to force workers to pay union dues. Now is the time, in the face of = tough U.S. Senate battle, when he is most likely to mend hia waye. please call him todu. U.S. Senale Questions#: 123456789 auestions#: 123456789 Distrht 3 DMriot 7 Questions# 1234567814 Paul Sacia-D ------David Obey-D ------Russell Feingold-D ------Steven Gunderson-R ------Dale Vannes-R YYYYYYYYY Robert Kasten, Jr.-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y - Y DlrtrM 4 Distrht 8 Gerald Kleczka-D ------Catherine Helms-D ------Joseph Cook-R YYYYYYYYY Toby Roth-R YYYYYYYYY

Dbtr3at 5 Dintriot 9 Thomas Barrett-D ------Ingrid Buxton-D ------Donalda Ann James Hamnersmith-R YYYYYYYYY Sensenbrenner, Jr.-R - Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y D-iot 6 Peggy tautenschlager-D ------Thomas Petri-R ------

, ~.l., .. .,;...... ,, ......

. . I. c 0 Key: .. .

Y =Yes N =No

.. survey Questions

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the “services” 6. Will YOU support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuss to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidates opposed by union forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in federal laws which 7. Will you oppose so-called “anti-doub!e breasting” legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has. as its primary goal, to forcibly unionize employees of construction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley Act. which authorizes state Right 16) Work iaws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy 5: Hatch Act, which protecls federal employees from union political 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextortion statute? 9. Will you oppose legislation that would punish or require the firing of employees who choose to work during a snike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state, give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees IO pay union dues?

Note: The National Right to Work Committee. of course, endorses no candidates. We are a nonpartisan organization. But we believe rhat you as a Right to Work supporter are entitled to know which candidates will support the right of every American to em3 living - without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. The infomation below is helphl m explaining the questions on the revase side of lhis fm.

A union, under present federal laws, is empowered to Reorganization Act of 1970 md executive orders dating back to represent and bind all employees in a company's bargaining the administmion of Plresident John F. Kennedy. unit including employees who oppose the union and don't - 6. Laboa unions are the only private. organization in the U.S. want its "services." which can legally force individuals to pay dues into their This monopoly bargaining power. generally described as tlwswies. "exclusive bargaining rights," deprives employees of their right The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) prohibits union to bargain for themselves. Union officials fought for this power oficids from giving any of these dues dollars diaectly'to a and refuse to give it up; yet they complain they are "unfakly candidare for federal office. burdened by the legal obligation" to-wtnonmembers. At the same time. FECA permits union officials to use Such complaints are intended to pave the way for compelling workers' compulsory dues dollars for "in-kind" political fuiancial support from sc-called "free riders" for representation spding on goods and services to elect candidates for federal they do not want 0ftiR.S. The firing of workers who refuse to pay union dues and/or These "in-kind" expenditures ape in &tion to union PAC fees is explicitly sanctioned by both the National Labor contributions; they are seldom - if ever - documented or Relations Act and the National Railway Labor Act. reporteal to the Fed& Election Commission. Section 7 of the NLRA, for example, stipulates that No official statistics for total union "in-kind" expenditures employees shall have "the right to refrain" from participating in are available. But Labor coiqnist Victor Ria! &npd Ih;U union activities "except to the extent that such right may be this sxdkd '%oft money" amounted to i0 times morithan affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor what union PACs gave in cash contributions., Based 'on @at organization as a condition of employment." yardstick, union ,"soft money" in 1990 exceeded.. $350.. million. .. . The problem'of compulstiry unionism created by was 7. IR recent ye&. legislation has been introduced inconps Congress. It will not be solved until Congress repeals the to automatidly impose union hepresentation upon workcrs'df existing federal authorizations of compulsory unionism. nonunionized companies which have Ihe:s .. , even In 21 states. wage'&ners - except those covered by the economic liito $ionized companks. National Railway EaboiAct - are shielded from compulsory Even though 'be nonunionized and the unionized unionism by Right td Work laws. - each perform sebarate and distinct work, the com*.Gon . .The l%rida.guarantee is typical -of lhese laws, saying, 'The contract would be automatically imposed upon the,+o$+ion right of persons to work shall not be denied or abridged on workers, without even tRe &ow account of membership or nonmembership in any labor union or National Labor Rela@onsBod labor organituion." The "anti-double b&soing" I The authority of states to adopt and enforce such laws is Common Situs picketing by Fitting mion organizers UJ use reaffirmed by Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley amendments to a dispute with a single subcontractor as an excuse to picket &d the Natiom! Labor Relations Act. shut ..down . all the other subcontractorsat ajob Site. . ' !

Extortion, as a technique, is extremely useful to union 8. ' Legislation has been introduced repeatedly in Congress to officials in obtaining such demands as compulsory union shops, loosen the 50-year-old Hatch Act's reSerictiOns agaim "agency" shops. compulsory hiring halls and irrevocable dues political activity by federal employ&. check-off clauses. Federal union officials now wield monbpoly bargaining While most criminal law is administered at the state and local power over federal employees, which makes union officials le level, some criminal activities (including extortion). which sole conduit for civil servants in collective bargaining and obstruct interstate commerce, have been deemed by Congress to grievance situations. be so important that they should be covered by federal statutes. Current proposals to weaken the Hatch Act lack explicit As the federal law currently stands, union officials have prohibitions against the use of monopoly bargaining power to unique special immunities from prosecution for threatening to coerce civil servants into supporting federal union officials' commit or committing felonies - such as murder, political agenda. manslaughter. maiming, arson, aggravaed pniperly destruction, 9. Legislation .has been.introduced in Congress that would explosives or firearms offenses, etc. - to obtain collective prevent employee from hiring permanent replacement workers bargairig demands. during a strike. For the past several yem, Congress has been confronted by The bill's provisions would also penalize workers who bills designed to authorize the forced unionization of public choose not to strike by giving preferential, post-strike hiring employees at various levels of government privileges to strikers. Several of these proposals are aimed at state, county and Since an employer is unlikely to find employees who will municipal employees and would nullify existing state laws work during a violent strike under these conditions, employers which shield public employees from union coercion. would be forced to cave in to every demand by union officials Other bills would strip postal workers and other federal - including thc demand that workers who refuse to pay union employees of the freedom of choice guaranteed by the Postal dues be fired. To: Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite 8500 Springfield, VA 22160

From:

Dear Reed:

I have:

Called the candidates. - Written a personal letter or otherwise contacted the candidates.

Enclosed a contribution of:

$25 - $50 $100

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC. The National Richt to Work Cornrnittcc's Washineton D.C. Headquarters i9 louted at our nation's clpi- tal at ~~1 Braddock Road. Suite 500 Sorinefield. VA 2lfJ3 Teleohone (8M) 325-7892. Because the IRS lies recoenized NRTWC as tax exemot under IRC Sec. jfll(cl(4, which wennits unlimited lobbvine -mntnbutions 3rc not tax deductible as charitable contributions. CA Reed Larson 8001 Braddock Road, Suite 500 Springfield, Virginia 22160

October 26, 1992 Dear Committee Member: The Right to Work Survey results for your congressional district are in -- and I'm very alarmed. I'm ven d isturbed that Conuressman Vic Fazio refused to jV* Mr. Fazio won't say whether he will defend struggling California workers and small businesses from destructive forced- unionism legislation. 1 But his record in Congress speaks volumes. As one of Big Labor's most reliable water carriers in the House of Representatives, Mr. Fazio helped Ted Kennedy ram his job-destroying Pushbutton Strike bill (S. SS/H.R. 5) through the House. The Strike bill has already passed the House, and Big Labor is within three votes of pushing it through the Senate. The Pushbutton Strike bill would force employers to fire workers who resist union-boss strike orders, allowing Big Labor to take over thousands of now-independent businesses and jobs. This scheme could cripple our economy -- destroying thousands of jobs and bankrupting hundreds of businesses. And Ted Kennedy's bill would blow a huge hole in all state Right to Work laws. Vic Fazio also voted three times to gut the Hatch Act. If the Hatch Act is destroyed, Big Labor would have the power to dragoon 2.9 million federal workers (and countless private citizens) into the union political machine. Mr. Fazio even refused to defend a state's right to enact a Right to Work law. He won't tell California citizens whether or not he would vote to destroy all state Right to Work laws by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. And union operatives have stuffed more than $161,000 into Vic Fazio's re-election campaign as a payoff for his votes. And the cash is only the tip of the iceberg. Union political pros have probably dumped in ten times the amount of cash Mr. Cox has received in the form of "soft money" -- partisan get-out-the- vote drives, phone banks, and full-time, paid %olunteers.lt On the other hand, Bill Richardson answered his Risht to Work -Candidate Survev 100 Dercent in favor of Risht to Work. Mr. Richardson pledged to fight Ted Kennedy’s job-destroying Strike bill. And he promised to protect the Iiatch Act, and fight Big Labor attempts to destroy all 21 state Right to Work laws. I don‘t know why Mr. Pazio won’t answer his survey. Maybe he thinks he can take a “middle ground” between slavery and freedom. But there’s one thing Mr. Fazio may be forgetting:

&lm unionism and surmort Right to Work. For the next few days the politicians will be paying much closer attention to what you tell them. Please do two thinqs to catch the candidates’ ears: 1) Contact Mr. Richardson and Mr. Fazio bv mail and/or by phone. Call Bill Richardson at 916-344-4592 and thank him for pledging support for Right to Work. Then call Mr. Fazio at 916-978-4381and tell him to stop hiding his views and embrace Right to Work. Tell him to return his tainted Big Labor cash. 2) Also. dease comulete and return the enclosed Risht to Work Survey ReDly with (if Dossible) a contribution to helD- Day for the Riaht to Work Carididate Survev Drouram. Thanks so much for helping the Committee’s Survey program. You and other members are the secret to our success.

P.S. With Big Labor’s power in Washington already growing stronger, it’s more important than ever to urge the candidates for Congress to support Right to Work. Tell Mr. Fazio to come clean on Right to Work by repudiating his compulsory-unionism votes and answering his survey in full support of worker freedom. Also, thank Bill Richardson for his 100 percent pro-Right to Work pledge. Urge him to resist all Big Labor pressure to back down. CA e

auesncns#: 123456789 QuorUcns#: 123456%89 Qirtrfdt S Dpstriat 11 Robert Matsul-D ------Patricia Garmndi-O ------1916) 551-2846 (916) 776-1492 Robert Dinsmore-R Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Richard W. Po*-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y (916) 929-1930 (2091 835-4247

DiRlM 0 nintde 12 LVM WOOlseV-0 ------I Tom Iantos-D _____-_-- (707) 795-9495 Jim Tomlin-R YYYYYYYYY 1714) 434-1992 Bill Filante-R YYYYYYYYY (415) 572-8953 (415) 492-1711 US. House of Representatives Dl~tziatl3 .. Qistsiat 7 Pete Stark-0 ---_----- i. .~. Questions#: 123456789 George Miller-D ------(510) 635-1092 t5lOi 602-1880 Verne Teyler-:: YYYYYYYYY Dave Scholl-R YYYYYYYYY (510) 538-8117 (707) 425-3381 DLtriat 14 Db.trLat 8 -0 ------Nancy Pelosl-D ------i4i5) 495-4910 -. (415) 556-4862 TGm Huenhg-R YYYYYYYYY Marc Wolin-R y--y ----- (415) 327-2992 (415) 771-8039 bihriat 15 ,j Dlatzfnt 9 Nom Mineta-D ------Ronald V. Dellums-D ------(408) 984-6676 -.'.I::: (510) 763-0370 Robert Wick-R Y-yYYYY-Y (408) 296-3300 . . ._. ,,.? , DhtadOt 10 . ...: Wendell H. Williams+ .. , . , L' ------Qlstriat 16 K. L. Richardson-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 1510) 937-4551 ------c. j Don Edwards-D . , .. .. .- (916) 344-4592 Bill Baker-R YYYYYYYYY (4081 247-1711 _------' ' ,.:7+LG (510) 932-2537 Ted Bundesen-R --,I> (408) 742-6655 .. .sj Patricia Malberg-D ------...... 7.a. (9161 645-9260 ., 'L John Ooollttle-R YYYYYYYYY (202) 225-2511 I

.I :. . .I/

1. Do you believe an employee who dues not want the "services" 6. Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative. which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidates opposed by union forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in federal laws which 7. will you oppose so-called "antidouble b-hg" le&hr;on authorize comuulsorv unionism? tkat has, as its primary goal, to forcibly unionize employees of construction companied 3. Do YOU favor preservation of Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley Act, which authorizes state Right 10 Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act. which urotects federal emolovees.< from union WliZkd 4. Would you supwrt legislation to end the special immunity cmrcinn?.. . . - .. I union officials bresenGy enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextonion statute? 9. Will you oppose legislation that would punish or require the firing of employees w!x choose 10 work during a snike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state, nive union officials the Dower to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? &fuse to force their employees to pay union dues? I Note: The National Right to Work Committee. of course, endorses no candidates. We are a nonpanisan organization. But we believe that you as a Right to Work supporter are entitled to know which candidates will support the right of every American to earn a living - without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. Questions# 123456789 Qwrstions#: 123456789 Questions #: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 DistriQ 11 D-lat 30 riat 43 Leon E. Panetta-D ------j -D Takano-D ------(408) 649-3555 I (213) 722-0405 1714) 820-7836 ' Bill McCampbell-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 1 Morry Waksberg-R -R YYYYYYYYY

~ (408) 372-9230 1 1213) 858-8808 (714) 682-1992

I nietria 18 nwM31 DLrtriot 44 , -D Matthew t&rtinez-D Georgia Smith-D --- Y-N--- I (209) 527-1914 , (2021 225-5464 (714) 275-3224 Reuben Franco-R AI McCandless-R YYYYYYYYY

~ DiEtri& 10 (310) 281-8395 (619) 340-2900 ' Richard Lehman-D 1 1209) 487-5760 , Uatrlat32 0i.etlUt 45 ! Tal Cloud-R 1 Julian Dixon-D Patricia McCabe-D ____-__--

~ (209) 233-1151 (2021 225-7084 (714) 960-6237 I -R ------i DMriOt20 DbtxIat 33 (202) 224-2415 Calvin Dooley-D Lucille

' .-~ (202) 225-3341 I Roybal-AllaZd-D 46 ! i:..ia HWt-R , (2131 268-6601 Robert Banuelos-D ------.a<- (209) 488-3133 Robert Guzman-R I 1714) 647-5306 , ii (213) 560-8494 Robert Dornan-R YYYYYYYYY , i:i Ddptrka 21 (714) 971-9292 i;? Bill Tbomas-R YYYYYYYNY Dintrlat 34 Richard Newhouse-L ------Estehan Torres-D .. Dbtr%at 22 (213) 695-0702 Blrtrid 47 i;, Gloria Dchoa-D John Anwiller-D ------T=:< (805) 568-2186 J. Hernandez-R (714) 458-1657 i, C_. -R (310) 698-2286 -R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y li.i (805) 897-1800 Diperfzrt 35 (714) 474-8683 -D .~~.Dbtriat 23 (213) 233-0733 -xiat 40 Anita Ferguson-D Nate Truman-R Michael Farber-D ------ti (805) 658-1803 (619) 749-6938 i -R DMrio+ 36 I Ron Packard-R YYYYYYYYY .~ (805) 522-4487 -D 1619) 7 -3 I 438-0443 (310) 395-1977 . Joan Flores-R I -de53 Anthony Beilenson-D (213) 485-3347 -D ------(818) 345-1560 (619) 231-8700 Tom Wlintock-R DLtriat 37 Judy Jarvis-R YYYYYVYYY 1805) 987-9797 Walter Tucker-D 1619) 292-1142 (310) 763-5850 Wstrdat 25 Distriat 50 James Gilmartin-0 DbtrM 30 -D ------(805) 251-8484 Evan Braude-0 (619) 236-6688 Howard McKeon-R (310) 590-6919 Tony Valencia-R YYYYYYYYY 1805) 252-8931 -R (619) 287-8681 (310) 985-8300 -at 26 nirtriat 51 Howard Berman-D Pliatrict 39 Bea Herbert-D YNYYNNNNN (818) 891-0543 Molly McClanahan-D (619) 756-1552 Gary Fotsch-R (714) 738-6311 Randy CuMfnghdm-R ------(818) 767-1078 -R (619) 287-8851 (714) 871-0270 DistriQ 27 DL7txIak 52 DaUg Kahn-D nmlat 40 Janet Gastil-D ------(818) 798-7581 Donald Rusk-D 1619) 765-0111 Carlos Moorhead-R (714) 792-9749 Duncan Hunter-R YYYYYYYYY (8181 247-8445 Jerry Lewis-R (619) 579-3001 (714) 862-6030 nt.triat 28 Al Wachtel-D DintrM 41 (714) 621-8000 Bob Baker-D David Dreier-R 1310) 948-7960 (818) 339-9078 -R (ii4) 861-3844 Di6triae 29 eenry Waxman-D DLtriet 42 (213) 651-1040 George Brown, .7r.-D Mark Robbins-R (202) 225-6161 . =NoResponse (213) 608-5629 Richard Rutan-R (8051 824-4600 D = Democrat R = Republican I = Independent E = Libertarian To: Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite #500 Springfield, VA 22160

From:

Dear Reed:

I have:

Called the candidates.

Written a personal letter or otherwise contacted the candidates.

Enclosed a contribution of:

$25 $50 -_I $100

$500 Other

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC. ..

The Notioirol Rirhc to Work Committee's W3shinr.ton D.C. Headquarters is loc3led at our notion's aDi- e1 3t 8001 Rroddock Road. Suite 3Xl - Swri~&fi& VA 2160 TeleDhone (800) 325-782L ~II~the IRS hos recomizcd NKTWC 3s tax exempt under IRC SeC jOl(d14). which mnnlts unliniitvd lobhving, conmbutinn.: .ire not bxdcdiicrible3s chont~hlecontributions. IL-16 Reed Larson 8001 Braddock Rod, Suite 500 SpringtMd. Virginia 22160

October 26, 1992

Dear Committee Member: The Right to Work S-Jrvey results €or your congressional district are in -- and I'm very alarmed. I'm verv disturbed that Consressman John Cox refused to answer his I992 Ricrht to Work Candidate Survey. Mr. Cox won't say whether or not he will defend struggling Illinois workers and small businesses from destructive forced- unionism legislation. But his record in Congress speaks volumes. As one of Big Labor's most reliable water carriers in the House of Representatives, Mr. Cox helped Ted Remedy ram his job- destroying Pushbuttori Strike bill (S. 55/H.R. 5) through the House. The Strike bill has already passed the House, and Big Labor is within three votes of pushing it through the Senate. The Pushbutton Strike bill would force employers to fire workers who resist union-boss strike orders, allowing Big Labor to take over thousands of now-independent businesses and jobs. This scheme could cripple our economy -- destroying thousands of jobs and bankrupting hundreds of businesses. And Ted Kennedy's bill would blow a huge hole in all state Right to Work laws. John Cox also voted to kill the Hatch Act. If the Hatch Act is gutted, as Big Labor is demanding, union bosses would have the power to dragoon 2.9 million federal wclrkers (and countless private citizens) into the union political machine. Mr. Cox even refused to defend a state's right to enact a Right to Work law. He won't tell Illinois citizens whether or not he would vote to destroy all state Right to Work laws by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. And union operatives have stuffed more than $89,000 into John Cox's campaigns as a payoff for his votes. And that cash is only the tip of the iceberg. Union political pros have probably dumped in ten times the amount: of cash Mr. Cox has received in the form of "soft money" -- partisan get-out-the-votedrives, phone banks, and full-time, paid "valunteers.'I On the other hand, Donald Manzullo answered his Risht to Work Candidate Survey- 100 percent in favor of Risht to Work. Mr. Manzullo pledged to fight Ted Kennedy‘s job-destroying Strike bill. Also, he promised to protect the Hatch Act, and fight Big Labor attempts to destroy all 21 state Right to Work laws. I don’t know why Mr. Cox did not answer the survey I sent him. Maybe he thinks he can get away with taking a “middle groundt1between slavery and freedom for Illinois workers. But there’s one thing Mr. Cox may be forgetting: An overwhelmins maioritv of Illinois citizens OPPOSE forced unionism and support Risht to Work. For the next few days the politicians will be paying much closer attention to what you tell them.

...... Please do two thinqs to catch the candidates’ ears: F; h;: 1) Contact Mr. Manzullo and Mr. Cox by mail. and/or bv Dhone. ’?...... >..I :=: 1 . .~._. Call Donald Manzullo at 815-394-1992 and thank him for his pledge to support Right to Work. Call John Cox at 815-987-4326 and tell him to stop hiding his views and embrace Right to Work. Tell him to return his tainted Big Labor cash. 2) Also, please comlete and return the enclosed Riqht to Work Survev ReDlV with (if possible) a contribution to help Dav for the Right to Work Candidate Suwev Droqram. Thanks so much for helping the Committee‘s survey program. You and other members are the secret to our success.

Reed Lairson P.S. With Big Labor’s power in Washington already growing stronger, it’s more important than ever to urge the candidates for Congress to support Right to Work. Tell Mr. Cox to come clean on Right to Work by repudiating his compulsory-unionism votes and answering his survey in full support of worker freedom. Also, thank Donald Manzullo for his 100 percent pro-Right to Work pledge. Urge him to resist all Big Labor pressure to back down. U.S. Senate Quostions1: 123456789 DkhrM 8 QUOSHOIIS~: 123456789 Sheila smith4 ------John Cox, Jr.-D -D ------(708) 776-9292 (815) 987-4326 Richard Williamson-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Philip Crane-R YYYYYYYYY Donald Manzullo-R Chad Koppie-C ------(3121 394-0790 (815) 394-1992 Joe Dillier-I ---YYYYYY US. House of Representatives (708) 991-8551 DbtlAQk 3.7 -D auostionse: I 23456789 Dints* 9 Ken Schloemer-R mat1 Sidney Yates-D -------D ------Herb Sohn-R ------DiK&iat 18 Jay Walker-R YYYYYYYYY Ronald Hawkins-D i r. Diet- 10 Robert Michel-R :.. !mts!iat 2 John Porter-R Y Y YYYYYY Y ii iM1 Reynolds-D ------Michael Kennedy-D ------Di&riat 19 C:Ron Blackstone-R YYYYYYYYY -D r:=/ Dhtriot 11 Douglas Lee-R r>- 3 George Sangmeister-D ------iWilliarn 0. Lipinski-D ------Robert DhtrLat 20 ..k.- Harry Lepinske-R YYYYYYYYY Herbo1sheher-R YYYYYYYYY Ris!ard Durbin-D .._ -R ...ignUdcg . .~ -riot 12 l7-j Luis Guttierrez-0 ------Jerry Costello-D ------. I Hildegarde Mike Starr-R ------: Rodriguez-Schieman-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y - Y DLmtsi& U :'$&td& 5 Harris Fawell-R YYYYYYYYY aa0 Rostenkowski-D ------Dennis Michael -' Elias Zenkich-R YYYYYYYYY Temple-D YYYYYYYYY _.: ?+&xiat 6 Dlrtrl.& 14 := Barry Watkins-D ------Jonathan Rem Hyde-R Y YYY Y YYYY Abram Reich-D ------J. -R ------bkriatl -D ------DL~rtriat15 NO- Bocclo-R ------Charles Mattis-D ------Thomas Ewing-R ------

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the "services" 6. Will you support amendments eo the Federal Election of a labor union should have heright to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative. which federal law now and fees for political awes and cmdidaw opposed by union forces him to accept? membm? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in federal laws which 7. Will you oppose so-cded "anti-double breaseing" legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has, as its primary goal, to forcibly unionize employees of construction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation OF Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley Act, which authorizes state Right to Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union political 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextortion statute? 9. Will you oppose legislation that would punish or require the tiring of employees who choose to work during a strike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal. state. give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees to pay union dues?

Note: The National Right to Work Committee, of course, endorses no candidates. We are a nonpartisan organization. But we believe that you as 3 Right to Work suppowr m entided IO know which candidares will support the right of every American to earn a living -without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. ’Ihe information below is helpful in explaining rhe questions on the reverse side of this form.

’ 1. A union, under present federal laws, is empowered to Reorganization Act of 1970 and executive orders dating back to represent and bind all employees in a company’s bargaining the administration of President John E Kennedy. unit - including employees who oppose the union and don’t 6. Labor unions the only Mvate oFganization in le want its “wvices.” are u.s. which can legally force individuals to pay dues into their This monopoly bargaining power. generally described as txeasuries. “exclusive bargaining rights.” deprives employees of their right Tine Fed& Election Campaign Act WCA) prohibits union to bargab for themselves. Union offiiials fought for this power officials from giving any of these dues dollars directly a and refuse to give it up; yet they complain they are “unfairly to candidate for federal office. ._, burdened by the legal obligation” to represent nonmembers. At the same time, FECA permits union officials to use Such complaints are intended to pave the way for compelling workers’ compulsory dues dollars for “in-kind“ political I 1 financial suppt from so-called “hxx riders” for representation -I spending on goads and Services to elect candidates for federal = theydonotwan!. offices. The fhgof workers who refuse to pay union dues and/or These ”in-kind” expenditures are in ,addition to union PAC _%_*..,I % fees is explicitly sanctioned by both the National Labor contributions: they are seldom - if ever - docuqen@:or Relations Act and the National Railway Labor Act. repted to the Federal Election Commission. . Section 7 of the NLRA. for example, stipulates that No official statistics for total union “h-kind” employees shall have ‘%e right to refrain“ born pdciphg in are available. Bat labor columnist Victor R union activities “except to the extent that such right may be this so-called “soft money” amounted B’10 affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor what union PACs gave in cash contributions. orpization a wndition of employmen!.” yardstick, union “soft mqy”in 1991) exceded as ,.‘ ‘G,.. q&%%.’ The problem of c’dmpulsory unionism was created by 7. In recent years, ~qis~on ha^ been intmdud” Congress. It will not be solved until Congress repeals the to automatically impunion representation up& , .~ existing federal authorizations of compulsory unionism. ZJ nonunionized companies which have even the- ’ . 3. In 21 states. wage earners - except those covered by the economic links to unioniwl National Railway LAm Act - are shielded from compulsory Even though the non& unionism by Right to Work laws each perform sep- and distinct The Rorida &amme is typical of these laws, saying, ‘The conpct would be automatically imposed right of pkm& m‘work shall not be denied or abridged on workes. ivibobt eien the &ow of an eiec account of membership or nonmembership in any labor union or Natiod Labor Retations Board to de labor organk&n.” The “anti-double bmting” legis! The authority of states to adopt and enforce such laws is Common Situs picketing by permitting union or reafhned by Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley amendmenls to a dispute with a single subcontractor as an excuse.m’:piic.!cet.and.. , the National Labor Rela6ions Act. shut down all the olher subnaactors at a job site. ’: .: ..:. , 5. Extortion. as a technique, is extremely useful to union 8. Legislation has been introduced repeatedly in Congress ,m officials in obtaining such dmmds as complsory union shops. loosen the SO-yf%r-old Hatch Act’s reStrictim against p-i .. I ”agency” shops. compulsory hiring halls and inevocable dues political activity by federal employees. . . .:;,; ,; chcdc-off clauses. Federal union officials now wield monopoly bargaining While most criminal law is administem3 at the sfate and local power over federal employees, which makes union offiisthe level, some criminal activities (including extortion), which sole conduit for civil servants in coI6ective bargaining and obsmct interstate commerce. have been deemed by Congms to grievance situations. be so important that they should be covered by federal statutes. Current proposals to weaken the Hatch Act lack explicit As the federal law currently stands, union officials have prohibitions against the use of monopoly bargaining power unique special immunities from pmsecution for threatening to coerce civil servants into supparting federal union officials’ c3mmit or committing felonies - such as murder, political agenda. manslaughter, maiming, arson, aggravated property deshuction. Legislation has been introduced in Congress that would explosives or firearms offenses, etc. to obtain collective 9. - prevent employers from hiring permanent replacement workers bargaining demands. during a strike. 5. For the past several years, Congress has been confronted by The bill’s provisions would also penalize workers who bills designed to authorize the forced unionization of public choose not to smke by giving preferential. post-strike hiring employees at various levels of government. privileges to suikers. Several of these proposals are aimed at state, county and Since an employer is unlikely to find employees who will municipal employees and would nullify existing state laws work during a violent s&e under these conditions, employers which shield public employees from union coercion. would be forced to cave in to every demand by union officials Other bills would strip postal workers and other federal - including the demand that workers who refuse to pay union employees of the freedom of choice gwteed by the Postal dues be fired. ht t 8

To: Reed Larson, President National Ri.ght to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite t500 Springfield, VA 22160

From:

Dear Reed:

I have:

Called the candidates.

Written a personal letter or otherwise !-;if contacted the candidates. Enclosed a contribution of:

$25 $50 $100

$500 Other

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC. The National Right to Work Committee's Washintton D.C. Headauarters is located at our nation's sui- tal at 8001 Braddock Road. Suite 500 * Sorinz-25-7892. Because the IF5 has recognized NRTWC as tax exemDt under IRC Sec. 501(c)(4), which permits unlimited lobbving, contribliiions are not tax deductible as charitable contributions.

. OH Reed Larson 8001 Braddock Road, Suite 500 Springfield. Via22160

October 26, 1992

Dear Committee Member: The Right to Work Survey results for your congressional district are in -- and I'm very alarmed. I'm very disturbed that refused to answer his Candidate Survev. Mr. Strickland won't say whether he will defend struggling Ohio workers and small businesses from destructive forced-unionism - legislation. But the union bosses are courting Mr. Strickland heavily, dumping thousands of dollars in cash into his campaign. And that cash is gnly the tip of the iceberg. Union polj.tica1 pros have probably dumped in ten times the amount of cash Mr. Strickland has received in the form of "soft money1' -- partisan get-out-the-votedrives, phone banks, and full-time, paid "volunteers. Big Labor will pull his , and Ted Strickland will become a reliable water carrier in Congress. The union bosses will call on Ted Strickland to help Ted Kennedy ram his job-destroying Pushbutton Strike bill (S. 55/M.R. 5) into law. The Pushbutton Strike bill would force employers to fire workers who resist union-boss strike orders, allowing Big Labor to take over thousands of now-independent businesses and jobs. This scheme could cripple our economy -- destroying thousands of jobs and bankrupting hundreds of businesses. The Big Labor hierarchy will 'also instruct Ted Strickland to gut the Hatch Act. If the Hatch Act is destroyed, Big Labor would have the power to dragoon 2.9 million federal workers (and countless private citizens) into the union political machine. Mr. Strickland refused to defend a state's right to enact a Right to Work law. He won't tell Ohio citizens whether or not he would vote to destroy all state Right to Work laws by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. Gn the other hand, Consressman Bob McEwen answered his Riaht to Work Candidate Survev 100 Dercent in favor of Risht to Work. Congressman McEwen has been a proven fighter against compulsory unionism in the House of Representatives. He helped lead a tough battle against Ted Kennedy's job- destroying Strike bill. And he voted twice to guard American citizens from union-boss political coercion by protecting the Match Act. I don't know why Mr. Strickland won't answer the survey I sent him. Maybe he thinks he can get away with taking a "middle ground" between slavery and freedom for Ohio workers. But there's one thing Mr. Strickland may be forgetting: An overwhelmins maioritv of Ohio citizens OPPOSE forced unionism and sumort Risht to Work. For the next few days the politicians will be paying much closer attention to what you tell them. Please do two thinss to catch the candidates' ears: 1) Contact Consressman McEwen and Mr. Strickland bv md and/or bv Dhone. Call Congressman Bob McEwen at 614-353-5171 and thank him for his support of Right to Work. Then call Mr. Strickland at 614-259-4493 and tell him to stop hiding his views and embrace Right to Work. Tell him to return his tainted Big Labor cash. 2) Also. Dlease comlete and return the enclosed Risht to Work Survey RF?D~Vwith (if Dossiblel a contribution to helu Day for the Risht to Work Candidate Survev Drosram. Thanks so much for helping the Committee's Survey program. You and other members are the secret to our success.

P.S With Big Labor's power in Washington already growing stronger, it's more important than ever to urge the candidates for Congress to support Right to Work. Tell Mr. Strickland to come clean on Right to Work by answering his survey in full support of worker freedom. OH

U.S. Senate Qus3UonsI: 123456789 QuesUons S: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ui.trtot 7 Disteick 16 Quastionst#: 123456789 Clifford Heskett-D Warner Mendenhall-D -------D -------R -R ------Michael DeWine-R ------8 n- 17 Fred Sennet-D NNNYNNNNN Jams Traficant, Jr.-D------

~ US. Mouse oi Representatiwes -R YYYYYYYYY Salvatore Pansino-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Questions# 123456789 WLat9 Dm18 m&xiot1 Karcy Kaptur-D --D ------Steve Grote-I YYYYYYYYY Xen Brown-R ’ Bill Ress-R YYYYYYYYY , ::ii David Mann-D ..------DbtXiat 10 nhtziat 19 i;: -i& 2 -D Eric Fingerhut-D ------cf Thomas Chandler-D N N N N N N N N N -R Robert Gardner-R YYYYYYYYY --: Bill Gradiscn-R ------I:! DAatrht 11 -D :_ Tony Hall-D ---- .. ---- - Beryl Rothschild-R ’.~ ’. Peter Davis-R YYYYYYYYY i .I id D.btdatp2 ;::I Dhtriat 4 Robert Fitrakis-D .i Raymond Ball-D -------R Michael Oxley-Ti ------.... .~. . _. Dbtldat 13 s.j 5 -D ’ -R ------Margaret Mueller-R

6 DMrM 14 .Ti Ted Strickland-D ------Tom Sawyer-D ii: (6141 259-4493 Robert Morgan-R Bob McEuen-R YYYYYYYYY (6141 353-5171 Dbt-datl.5 Richard Cordray-D -R

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the “services” 6. Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right D refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees for politid causes and candidates opposed by union forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in federal laws which 7. Will you oppose so-called “anti-double breasting” legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has, as its primary goal, to forcibly unionize employees of consauction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14(b) of the Taft-Haatley Act, which authorizes state Right to Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union political 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextonion statute? 9. Will you oppose legislation that would punish or require the f~ngof employees who choose to work during a strike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal. state. give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees IDpay union dtm?

Note: The National Right to Work Committee, of course, endorses no candidates. We are a nonpartisan organization. But we believe Lhat you as a Right to Work supporter are entitled to know which candidates will support the right of every American to earn a living - without having 10 pay union bosses for the privilege. BACKGROWER The informatian betow is helpful in explaining the questions on &e reverse side of rhis fm.

! 1 1. A union, under present federal laws. is empowered to Reorganization Act of 1970 and executive orders dating bzk to represent and bind dl employees in a company's bargaining the administration oFPresident John F. Kennedy. unit including employees who the union and don't - oppose 6. unions the only private organization the U.S. want its "seavices." are in which can 1ega:ly force individuals to pay dues into their This monopoly bargaining power, generally described as ..., .. .. . treasuries. "exclusive bargaining rights." deprives empbyees of hheir right The Election Campaign Act (FECA) prohibi& union to for themselves. Union offiials fought for this power Federal bargain officials bmgiving my of these dues dollars dimdy-to 8 and reFuse. to give it up; yet they complain lhey are "unfakly candidate for feded of&e.' :_ .. ..~! burdened by the legal obligation" to represent nonmembers. .At the ,same time, FECA permits union officials to use Such complaints are intended to pave the way for compelling workers' compulsory dues dollars for "in-&indl.political financial support from "free riders" for so-calIed representation spending on goods and services D.elect candidates for fe.4 they do not want. OfiiCeS. The fhgof workas who refuse to pay union dues andlor These "in-kind" expenditures aw in aEdi fees is explicitly sanctioned by both the National Labor conaibutions; 'Lkey are seldom - iE ever Relations Act and the Narional Railway Labor Act. reported tb the FedenI Election Commission. Section 7 of the NLRA. for example, stipulates that No official statistics for total union "in-kin employees shall have '%e right to refrain" fium participating in are available. Ect hbor columnist Victor union activities "except to the extent that suck right may be this so-called "soft money" amounted to affec6ed by an agreement requiring membership in a labor what union PACs gave in cash conaibu organization as a condition of employment." yardstick, union "soft money" in 1990 exceded The problem of compulsory.unionism was created by 7. I" &At years, legislation has Congress. It will not be solved until Congress repeals the to autoRlatldly impose. union repre .= I existing federal authorizations of compulsory unionism. i// li - nonunionized companies which I 3. In 21 states. wage earners - except those covered by the eCon6mic'Iink.j to utnionized companies , ' National Railway Labor Act - are shielded from compulsory Even Ihough the nonunionized and the unionism by Right 10 Work laws. each perfq Separate and distinct work, the compulsory ,*on Wl%iida guarantee is typid'of these laws. saying, 'me contract would be automatically imposed upon the'nonimion right of persons to work shalf not he denied or abridged on workws. without even the.show of an election codu+ by the muntof membership or nonmembenhip in any labor union or National Labop Relations Board to determine work+ w,, labor organization.- .The"anti-double breasting" legislation would also'encoumge The authority of states to adopt and enforce such laws is Common Sinus picketing by permitting union organiz& u) reaffirmedby Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley amendments to a dispute with a single subcontractor as an excuse to &kt and Ihe National Labor Relations Act. shut down all the other subcontractorsat a job sit& 4. Extortion, as a technique, is extremely useful to union 8. Legislation has been introduced repeatedly in Congress .to officials in obtaining such demands as compulsory union shops. loosen the 50-year-old Watch Act's restrictions against.. partisan "agency" shops, compulsory hiriag halls and irrevocable dues political activity by feral employees. .. ..L~ , check-off clauses. Federal union officials now wield monopoly bargaining While most aiminal law is administered at the sk%z and local power over federal employees, which makes unbn officials the level, some criminal activities (including extortion), which sole conduit for civil servants in collective bargaining and obstruct inwtate commexce, have been deemed by Congress to grievance situations. be so important that they should be covered by federal statutes. Current proposals to weaken the Hatch Act lack explicii As the federal law cmntly stands, union officials have prohibitions against the use of monopoly bargaining power 10 unique special immunities from prosecution for threatening to coerce civil servants into supporting federal union officials' commit or committing felonies - such as murder, political agenda. manslaughter, maiming, arsan, aggravated property destruction, 9. Legislalion has been inuoduced in Congress that would explosives or firearms offenses, etc. - to obtain collective prevent employers from hiring permanent replacement workers bargaining demands. during a strike. 5. For the past several years, Congress has been conhnted by The bill's provisions would also penalize workers who bills designed I," authorize the forced unionization of public choose not to snike by giving preferential, post-strike hiring employees at various Ievels of government privileges IO strikers. Several of these proposals are aimed at state, county and Since an employer is unlikely to find empioyees who will municipal employees and would nullify existing state laws work during a violent suike under these conditions, mployers which shield public employees from union coercion. would be forced to cave in to every demand by union officials Other biIIs wouId strip postal workers and other federal - including the demand that workers who refuse to pay union employees of the freedom of choice guaranteed by the Postal dues be tired. To: Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite #500 Springfield, VA 22160

From:

Dear Reed:

I have:

Called the candidates.

Written a personal letter or otherwise contacted the candidates.

Enclosed a contribution of:

$25 $50 __ $100

-- $500 Other

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC. The National Rieht to Work Committee's Washinrton D.C. Headwaters is located at our nation's cwi- tal at 8M)I Braddock Road, Suite 500 Sorinefield. VA 'Dl60 0 TeleDhone (8W)325-7892.Bewuse the IRS has recomized NRTWC as tax exempt under IRCSec. 501(c)(4). which mitsunlimited !obb~n& contributions are not tax deductible 3s charitable contribum. PA Reed Larssn 8001 Braddock Road, Suite 500 Springfield, Virginia 22160

October 26, 1992

Dear Committee Member: The Pennsylvania Right to Work Survey results for your congressional district are in -- and I’m very alarmed. I’m verv disturbed that both Conqressman Bill Goodlins and Shallenser Paul Kilker refused to answer their 1992 Risht to Work Candidate Survev. Because Mr. Goodling has been in Congress for 18 years and is the highest ranking member of his party-on the Education and Labor Committee, it is especially important to look at his views on compulsory unionism. Mr. Goodling won’t say whether or not he will defend struggling Pennsylvania workers and small businesses from destructive forced-unionism legislation. But his record in Congress speaks volurries. Mr. Goodling sponsored a slightly different version of Ted Kennedy’s job-destroying Pushbutton Strike bill (S. 55/H.R. 5) in the Ho’iise of Representatives last year. Thank goodness, his bill failed. But Congressman Goodling’s bill gave Big Labor added momentum to ram Kennedy’s Strike bill through the House. And if either the Kennedy or Goodling Strike bill passes the Senate (where Kennedy’s version fell only three votes short this past June), employers would be forced to fire workers who resist union-boss strike orders, allowing Big Labor to take over thousands of independent businesses and jobs. Representative Goodling‘s scheme could cripple our economy -- destroying thousands of jobs and bankrupting hundreds of businesses. And Bill Goodling‘s bill would blow a huge hole in all state Right to Work laws. Despite numerous protests from his constituents, Congressman Goodling still brags about his role in nearly passing the Kennedy- Goodling bill. And Bill Goodling also voted to kill the Hatch Act. If the Hatch Act is gutted, as Big Labor is demanding, union bosses would have the power to dragoon 2.9 million federal workers (and countless private citizens) into the union political machine. Mr. Goodling even refused to defend a state‘s right to enact a Right to Work law. He won’t tell Pennsylvania citizens whether or not he would vote to destroy all state Right to Work laws by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. On the other hand. Indenendent candidate Tom Humbert answered his Risht to Work Candidate Survev 100 Dercent in favor of Risht to Work. Mr. Humbert pledged to fight Ted Kennedy's job-destroying Strike bill. Also, he promised to protect the Hatch Act, aizd fight Big Labor attempts to gut all state Right to Work laws. I am concerned that Mr. Goodling did not answer the survey I sent him. Perhaps Mr. Goodling hopes he can avoid a clash with the union moguls by hiding his stand on Right to Work. Or maybe he thinks he can tzke a "middle ground" between slavery and freedom. But there's one thing Mr. Goodling may be forgetting:

An overwhelmins ma1'oritv of Pennsvlvania citizens OPPOSE forced unionism and sumort Risht to Work. For the next few days the politicians will be paying much 7, ... , __.. :I closer attention to what you tell them...... -, Please do two thinqs to catch the candidates' ears: 1) Contact Mr. Humbert. Mr. Kilker and Mr. Goodlins bv mail and/or bv Dhone. Call Mr. Humbert at 717-632-4844 and thank him for pledging support for Right to Work. Then call Paul Kilker at 717-757-2757 and tell him to stop hiding his views and embrace Right to Work. Lastly, call Congressman Goodling at 717-757-5656 and tell him to stop promoting forced unionism. 2) Also, olease complete and return the enclosed Risht to Work Survev RePlv with (if possible) a contribution to helo uav for the Risht to Work Candidate Survev Drosram. Thanks so much for helping the Committee's survey program. You and other members are the secret to our success.

P.S. With Big Labor's power in Washington already growing stronger, it's more important than ever to urge the candidates for Congress to support Right to Work. .. .PA ..

U.S. senate auesuonrIlf: 1234567~9 QuosMonaI: 123456789 D1.trSat I Biutriat 18 Qu@rtlonat: 12346678111 Peter Xosunayer-D ------Frank Pecora-D ------Lynn Yeakel-D ------Jams Greenwood-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Rick Santom-R ------Arlen Specter-R ------John Perry 111-L YYYYYYYYY DietSbt. 9 BMzld 19 Bud Shuster-R ------Paul Kilker-D ------U.S. House sf Reprssentatiwes (717) 757-2751 Dj28kiat 10 Bill Gocdling-R ____----- QUClDtiVfIS#: 123456789 Joseph McDade-R ------(717) 757-5656 M%ki&l Tom Humbee-I YYYYYYYYY Craig Snyder-R ------Di8txiGt 11 (7171 632-4844 Paul Kanjorski-D ------Michael Fescina-R ------Diaeriat 20 Austin Murphy-D -_------Dbtriatl2. Bill Townsend-R Y YYYYYYYY John Murtha-0 ------Dbtriat 21 DMdQ 13 John Harkins-D ------Marjorie Wzvinsky-D ------Tom Ridge-R -.._------Jon Fox-R YYY-YYYYY ..

DU?cxiat 14 William Coyne-D --- --_--- Byron Kinq-R Y-YYYYYY- DiaIxiat w Paul McHdle-D ------Don Ritter-R ------

DlstrWc 16 Robert Peters-D ------Robert. Walker-R ------

DMmt17 Bill Sturges-D ------George G@kas-R YYYYYYY-i: . .~ . ..

.'. .',i',P, ;. ~ ...... 'i

..

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the "services" 6. Will you support amendments to the Federal Elhon of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept lhat Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees for political. causes and candidates alpposed by Union forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in federal laws which 7. Will you oppose so-called "anti-double breasting" legislation authorize ~ompulsoryunionism? that has, as its primary goad, to forcibly unionize employees of consrmction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley Act, which authorizes state Right to Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union political 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextonion statute? 9. Will you oppose legislation that would punish or require the fing of employees who choose to work during a strike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal. state, give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees to pay union dues?

Note: The National Right 10 Work Committee, of course, endorses no candidates. We are a nonpanisan organization. But we believe that you as 3 Right to Work supporter are entitled u) know which candidates will support the right of every American to ema living - without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. BACKGRQWER The infomaiion below is hdphrl m explaining the questions on the revem side of this form.

A union. under present federal laws, is empowered to Reorganization Act of 1970 and exmttive odm dating back 10 represent and bind all employees in a company's bargaining the administration of President John F. Kennedy. unit - including employees who oppose the union and don't 6. only private orgmkkon in the want its "services." Labor are the U.S. which can legally force individuals to pay dues into tneir This monopoly bargaining power, generally described as ...... "exclusive bargaining rights," deprives employees of their right lr&es.-:r The Election Campaign Act (J3CA)prOhiits union to bargain for themselves. Union officials fought fw this power FederaI officials fny giving any of these dues dollars 'dirsctly.. 'p a and refuse to give it up; yet they complain they are "unf;rirly can~&&f& federal oftice...... burdened by the legal obligation" to represent nonmembers. AI &e same 'time, FECA permits union officials ,to*,use Such coppIairts are inrended to pave the way for compelling workers' compulsory dues dollars for %-kind" political fmiaI support frum so-called "free riders'' €or representation ~ spending goods and services elect candidates for federal they do not want. on to OfticeS. ..._.-...,- The fhgof workers who refuse to pay union dues and/or These "in-kind" expenditures are in. addition to Union~... G>l., PAC fees is explicitly sanctioned by both the National Labor canbibutions; they are seldom - if ever - d&Gmented.. or Relations Act and the National Railway Labor Act reported to the Fed& Election Commission. .I Section 7 of the NLRA, for example, stipulates that No official statistics for total union "k-hd" e.x@ndhiks employees shall have "the tight to re&" frum participating in union activities "except to the extent that such right may be affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor organization as a condition of employment" The problem of compulsory unionism was created by Congress. It will not be solved until Congress repeals the existing federal authorizations of compulsory unionism. ..,.. , ..,., .. In 21 stakjs,.kage earners - except those cover& by he

National Rd*-yL.ab& Act '- are shielded hmcompulsory unionism byRight to Work laws. . -. ,.nem-@.@,-tee is.,typical of tbese laws, saying, '%e right of persons to work shall not be denied or abridged on account of membership or nonmembership in any labor union or labor organization." The authority of states to adopt and enforce such laws is reaffkmed by Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hanley amendments to the National Labor Relations Act. Extortion, as a technique, is extremely useful to union 8. Le&lation has been introduced repeatedly in Congress officials in obtaining such demands as compulsory union shops, loosen the 50-year-old Hatch Act's restrictions against partisan ., .. "agency" shops, compulsory hiring halls and irrevocable dues politid activity by federal employees. . . .. , check-off clauses. Federal union officials now wield monapdy'bargainiflg While most criminal law is administered at the state and local power over fed& employees, which makes union officials the level, some criminal activities (including extortion). which sole conduit for civil servants in collective bargaining and obstruct interstate commerce. have been deemed by Congress to grievance situations. be so important that they should be covered by federal stalutes. Current proposals to weaken the Hatch Act lack explicit As the federal law currenuy stands, union officials have prohibitions against the use of monopoly bargaining power to unique special immunities ti-om prosecution for threatening to coerce civil servants into supporting feded union officials' commit or committing felonies - such as murder, political agenda. manslaughter, maiming. aggravated property destruction. arson, 9. Legislation has been introdaced in Congress that would explosives or firearms offenses, etc. - to obtain collective prevent employen fmm hiring permanent replacement wopkers bargaining demaids. during a suike. For the pas scvenl years. Congress has been confronted by The bill's provisions would also penalize workers who bills designed to aulhorize the forced unionization of public choose not to saike by giving preferential, post-strike hiring ernployem at various leve!s of government. privileges to strikers. Several of these pmposals are aimed at state. county and Since an employer is unlikely to find employees who will municipal employees and would nullify existing state laws work during a violent suike under these conditions, employers which shield public employees from union coercion. would be Forced to cave in to even demand by union officials Other bills would strip posral vvorkers and other federal - including the demand that workers who refuse to pay union employees of the freedom of choice guaranteed by the Postal dues be fired. To: Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite #500 Springfield, VA 22160

From:

Dear Reed:

I have

Called the candidates.

Written a personal letter or otherwise contacted the candidates.

Enclosed a contribution of:

- $25 $50 $100

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC. The National RiJlt to Work Committee's Wshinrrton D.C. Headmarten is located at our nation's oui- tal at 8or71 Braddock Road. Suite 5On Surinefield. VA 22160 Telephone (800)325-7892. Eecause the IRS has recoenized NRTWC as fax exempt under IRC Sec 501(c)(4), which Dennits unlimited lobbving, contributions are noi iay dedrrc!iblesschoritablc contributions. FL

8601 Braddock Road, Suite 50 Springfield, Virginia 22160

October 26, 1992

Dear Committee Member: I'm writing you today because I'm very concerned about how Tom Mims will vote on compulsory-unionism legislation if he becomes your next Congressman. I've sent Mr. Mims his 1992 Right to Work Candidate Survey three times. Thousands of pro-Right to Work Floridians have deluged him with phone calls, postcards, and letters urging him to answer his survey in favor of Right to Work. But Tom Mims refuses to respond. If, as a U.S. Congressman, Tom Mims votes to hand compulsory- unionism powers to Big Labor, Florida will suffer. And so will the entire nation. i The union bosses are eyeing Florida's 12th District ,g greedily. With pro-Right to Work Congressman Andy Ireland .!?j .. retiring, Big Labor is trying to move your District into its vote column. And Big Labor's candidate is clearly Tom Mims. The union hierarchy believes Tom Mims will be one of Big Labor's mast reliable water carriers in the U.S. House of Representatives. With Big Labor gearing up to take total control over our federal government with huge majorities in both houses of Congress, and possibly a lackey in the White House as well, every pro-Right to Work vote in Congress will be vital. Mr. Mim could vote to enact the entire union-boss political agenda into law. He could vote to destroy Florida's cherished Right to Work law by abolishing Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act, enact the Pushbutton Strike bill, repeal the Hatch Act, and force all government employees to pay union dues to swell Big Labor's political and organizing coffers. That's why I've urged you to inundate Mr. Mims with phone calls, letters, and postcards. Thousands of angry Florida citizens are urging him to support Right to Work. But Mr. Mims continues to stonewall. Your protests seem to be falling on deaf ears. Why is Tom Mims ignoring you and the rest of the huge majority of Florida citizens who oppose compulsory unionism? Union operatives have stuffed thousands of dollars into Tom Mims ’ campaign. And that cash is only the tip of the iceberg. Union political pros have probably dumped in ten times the amount of cash Mr. Mims has received in the form of llsoftmoney” -- partisan get-out-the-votedrives, phone banks, and full-time, paid %olunteers. It So while Mr. Mims is refusing to tell Right to Work supporters his position on forced unionism, union lobbyists know he’ll vote any way they say. It‘s a simple (if sleazy) arrangement. He votes their way; they bankroll his campaigns with forced-union dues stolen from American workers. Please call Mr. Mims now at (813) 665-2790 and urge him to repudiate his support for forced unionism. Only Y_OUT howls and screams can make Mr. Mims renounce his cozy relationship with Big Labor. Tell Mr. Mims you won’t stand for his political dirty pool of taking Big Labor backroom payoffs -- while he stonewalls Florida citizens. Tell him he’s not fooling anvbodv, and urge him to stop voting to force workers to pay union d~s. .ri>.- ...., : :I On the other hand, Mr. Mims‘ opponent, etharles Canady, a respond to his survey 100% for Right to Work. Mr. Canady has promised to help Stop Ted Kennedy’s Pushbutton Strike bill, fight for tougher enforcement of the Supreme Court’s ban on the use of forced dues for politics, oppose efforts to require public servants to pay union dues, and crack down on strike violence. However, Mr. Canady is under intense pressure from union goons to renounce his Right to Work support. It’s vital that you tell Mr. Canady not to back down. Please call him at (813) 644-2877 and tell him the people of Florida support his pledge.

P.S. Tom Mims must =eel the heat from concerned citizens like you to keep him from voting to force workers to pay union dues. Now is the time, in the face of a tough campaign, when he is most likely listen to you. Please call him today. U.S. §enat@ Ouertions# 123456789 Bob Graham-D ------Bill Grant-R YYYYYYYYY US. House QP ~~~~~~n~~~w~~ ou,asuon~il):123456780 Wriae 12 Charles Canady-R YYYYYYYYY (813) 644-2817 Tom Mims-0 ------(813) 665-2790 li ...... ,.

...... ,,,...... :-. . :. ~: . , , ...... :. -. i .. ,.U. , L! ..

...... I.

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want Ihe “services” 6. Will you support amendments to.lhs Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit ?.he use of compulsory union due union as his exclusive representative. which federal law now and fees for political awes and candidales ~pgosedby union forces him to accept? members?

2. Will YOU Support repeal of the provisions in feded laws which 7. Will you Oppose *=-called “antidouble bwling” legislation authorize compulsory unionism? i. mai 15s. as irr primary goal. to forcibly unionize employees of consrnrction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. which authorizes sme Right to Wok laws? 8. vjili you oppose legislation IO weaken or destroy rht: Harch Act, which protecfs federal employees from union political 4. Would you suppon legislation IO end the special immunity coercion? union officials presenlly enjoy from prosecution under the 9. Will you legislation lhat would punish or &e federal anti-sxtonion smxe? oppose quire firing of employees who choose IO work during a sbike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization o

A union, under present federal laws, is empowered to Rearganization Act of 19?0 and ereculi.ue orders dating back IO represent and bind all employees in a company's bargaining the ahinisIralion of President John F. Kennedy. unit - including employees who oppose the union and don't 6. unions the only private organization in the want its "mica." Labop are US. which legally force individuals to pay dues into their This monopoly bargaining power. generally described as can "exclusive bargainrng rights," deprives employees of their right aeasulies. The Fedd Election Campaign Act (FECA) prohibits union IO bargain for themselves. Unior! officials fought falhi power officials from giving any of these dues dollars directly to a and refuse IO give it up; yet they complain they are '*unfairly candida^ for federal office. burdened by the legal obligation" represent nonmembers. ID At the same time. FECA permils union otficials to use Such complaints are intended w pave the way for compelling workers' compulsory dues dollars for "in-kind" poIitica1 finarrcial mppon 6'om riders" €or repmlairon so-called "fne spending goads and senices elect candjdates for federal they do not want. on to offices. The firing of workers who refuse to pay union dues and/or These "in-kind" expenditures are in addition IO union PAC fees is explicitly saactioned by both the National Labor conmbutions; they are seldom - if ever - documented or Relations Act and the National Railway Labor Act reported to the Fedeml Ueztion Commission. Section 7 of the NLRA, for example, stipulates that No official sl;llisdcs for total Union "in-kind" expenditures employees shall have 'Lhe right IO reham" from Wcipating in are available. But Labor columnist Victor Riesel esMth union activities "except IO the extent that such right may be chis so-called "Soft money" mounted to 10 times more ahan affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor what union PACs gave in cash conbibutions. Based on lhal organization as a condition of employmenL" yardstick, union "Soft money" in 1990 exceededS350 million. .. ' The problem of compulsory unionism was created by 7. merit years. Iegislation has been inarwiu~edin'congrea Congress. It will not be solved un~ilCongress repeals the w automatically impose union repmenlation upon, of exisling feral authorizations of compulsory unionism. Woilras nonunionized companies which have even the slightest ...... In 21 states. wage earners - except those coverecl by the economic links m.unionized companies.' Narional Railway Labor Act -- are shielded from compulsory Even though the nonunionized and the unionbed wmkies unionism by Right IO Work laws. each perform sepak and distinct work, the compulsory hion The Rorida guaranlee is typical of lhese laws, saying, "The contract would be automatically imposed upon .t&e'nb~union right of persons lo work shall not be denied or abridged on workers, without even the show ofan elecrion condud by le account of membership or nonmembership in any labor union or Nai& Labor Relations Board IO determine warker"suppon " labor organization." The "antidouble brasting" legislation would ald encourage The authority of states IO adopt and enforce such laws is Common Situs picketing by permitting union organke&h use reaffmed by Section 14(b) of che Taft-Hartley amendmenls to a dispu~with B single subconrracwr as an excuse IO pickt and the National Labor Relaions Act. shut down all heohr subcnnmtors at ajob site. ' : Extortion. as a technique. is extremely useful to union G. Legislation has been in~ducedrepeawdly in'conongnss' IO officials in oblaining such demands as compulsory union shops, loosen the 50-year-old Hatch Act's restrictions against panisan "agency" shops, compulsory hiring halls and ifrevocable dues political activity by federal employees. .. check-off clauses. Federal union officials now wield monopoly bargaining While most criminal law is administered at the SUE and local power over fedd employees, which makes @ion 0ftlci.d~rhe level, some criminal activities (including extortion). which sole conduit for civil servants in collective bargaining and obstruct hlerslale commerce. have bndeemed by Congress IO grievance situations. be so knportant that they should be covered by federal sratutes. Cmenl proposals to weaken the Hatch Act lack explicit As the federal law cunently stands, union officials have prohibitions against the use of monopoly bargaining power to unique special immunities from prosecution for thmtening w coerce civil servants into supporting federal union officials' commit or committing felonies - such as murder, polinical agenda. mansbughwx, maiming, arson. aggravated property destruction. 9. Legislation has been introduced in Congress hat would explosives or firearms offenses, e&. - to obtain collective bargaining demands. prevent employers from hiring permanent replacement workers during a soike. Far the past several years, Congress has been confronted by The bill's provisions would also penalize workers who bills designed IO aurhorize the forced unionizatjon of public choose not lo strike by giving preferential, post-smke hiring employees at various levels of government. privileges to strikers. Several of these proposals are aimed at safe. county and Since an employer is unlikely tn find employees who will municipal employees and would nullify existing %ate laws work during a violent saike under these conditions, employers which shield public employees from union coercion. would be forced to cave in 'u3 every demand by union officials Other bills would suip poslal workers and other federal - iduding the demand that workers who refuse to pay union employees of the freedom of choice guamnleed by the Postal dues k. rued. The Notional Riaht to Work Grnrnil!re's Washinaton. D.C. He~dquartersis loaled at our "anon's caoilal at 8001 BrJddock Road. Suite 500 Sorinafield. VA 22160 Teleohone 003)321-9820. the IRS has recomized tax exempt-under jOl(c)(4). which permlis Because ~ ~~ NRTWC ~ ~~ as IRC ~ - Src. unljm&d lobbvink &mibutions are not tax deductible as charitable con@ibutiona TO : Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite #SO0 Springfield, VA 22160 FROM:

Dear Reed: ..

Thank YOU for sending me the results.of

the Right to Work Candidate Survey. 'To.make.' sure the candidates know where stand on " Right to Work, I have: .. - Called and/or written the candidates ,to'-. urge them to support Right to Work. ..,, -',:: 1 .: - Enclosed a contribution of: __ $25 __ $50 - $100

-. $200 - Other

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC November 16. 1992

Dear Georgia Member, Now that Bill Clinton has been elected President, your Senator may hold the fate of Right to Work in his hand. Your Senator may be the one who decides the future of Section 14(b) of the Tsft-Hartley Act, which allows Georgia to keep its cherished Right to Work Law. He may cast the deciding vote on Senator Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill, giving Big Labor the power to terrorize any business with a crippling strike -- easy as pushing a button. Your Senator may also be the one to conscript nearly 3 million federal employees into the union bosses' political amy -- with marching orders paid for with your tax dollars -- by repealing the 53-year-old Hatch Act. With Bill Clinton in the White House. the Senate will be the last redoubt of worker freedom. One vote in the Senate could determine the fate of Right t@ Work. Or, one vote could enact union-boss power grabq into law. If the Pushbutton Strike bill and Hatch Act repeal become law, you know what will happen to Georgia and the entire country: skyrocketing taxes and inflation will follow in the wake of bankrupted small businesses and lengthening unemployment lines as union organizers seek to control countless workers. The crucial mestion is. where do Georsia's Senate candidates stand on Riqht to Work? Incumbent Wvche Fowler refuse8 to say . In the past few months, I have written Mr. Fowler three times imploring him to tell his constituents where he stands on Right to Work. I've even tried certified mail. Still, Mr. Fowler continues to defy his constituents' right to know his views on the issues that will directly affect their lives. But after looking at Mr. Fowler's voting record in the U.S. Senate, it is clear what he's trying to hide. He voted on June 11th and June 16th of this year to quash a pro-Right to Work filibuster and enact the Pushbutton Strike bill, which would hand union "organizers" the power to punish or even fire workers who dare to go to their jobs in defiance of a union-boss strike order. By penalizing workers for resisting the union czars, the Kennedy Strike bill would have blown a huge hole in Georgia's Right to Work law. In June 1990. Senator Fowler voted in lockstep with the union czars to repeal the Hatch Act which protects federal employees from getting ensnared in partisan politics. This political payoff would have allowed union officials to browbeat 2.9 million federal employees and thousands of U.S. taxpayers into supporting the union political machine. I don't know whether Wyche Fowler supports Organized Laher's plans to wipe out Georgia's and 20 other state Right to work laws through repeal of Taft-Hartley Section 14(b). He won't say. But since he voted to gut your Right to Work law when he backed Ted Kennedy's job-destroying Strike bill, I must fear the worst. What's more, grateful union barons have delivered to Mr Fowler over $380,000 since 1986 from union-brass PACs. And experts agree that Big Labor has dumped ten times that amount into Mr. Fowler's campaign in the form of illegal "soft" money for phone banks, get-out-the-votedrives and paid "volunteers. All this paints the picture of a union boss puppet who shows no signs of cutting the strings that bind him to the union .~ bosses. ! ': .. . r-/ l.~i --ou...... ?-I Call (404) 331-0697, or pay a personal visit to Sen. Fowler. .. i- ...~ Demand that he repudiate his past support for forced ...! /: unionism. .. ~ -. ji I Onlv a deafeninq roar of arotest from Georqia's aro-Riqht to Work maioritv at thir clo3e3d xnd his ways. There is some good news. Mr. Fowler's opponent, Paul ...;-, Coverdell, has leveled with you and vowed 100% commitment to +=: j .-.. protect your Right to Work. But, Mr. Coverdell is under intense pressure from the union hierarchy to back down from his courageous stand. Please DhOne your thanks and encouraqement to Mr. Coverdell at (404) 320-1992. And I hope you wil.1 do one more thing. I had to spend money I didn't have to send you this special alert. Even though the Committee already has overdue bills from this year's battle against forced unionism, I had no choice. I had to enlist you and all Georgia Right to Work members in this last, crucial fight to save Georgia's Right to Work. So if you can, please return with the enclosed Right to Work Action Reply, a special contribution of $200, $100, $50 or $25 to help, defray the costs of this effort. But contact the candidates TODAY -- that's most imaortantl

P.S. Now that Big Labor has elected Bill Clinton President, your Senator's vote counts more than ever. If Georsia's citizens turn- heat ua hiqh enouqh even Wvche Fowler will see the m. Contact him today. Tell him to defend your Riqht to Work. Call (404) 331-0697. Also, please call Mr.-Coverdell to thank him for supporting Right to Work. His number is (404) 320-1992. 1 ci'.

~ Q

Candidates for the U.S. Senate

Quesiions#: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 h'yche Fowler, Jr.4 ------ Senate Washngton, DC 20510 (404) 331-0697

Paul Coverdell-R YYYYYYYYY 2804 kndrews Dr., NW , CA 30305 (404) 320-1992

I. Do you believe an employee who does not want the "services" 6. Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act KO prohibit the use of compulsory unioe dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidates opposed by union forces him U, accept? members? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in federal laws which I. Will you oppose so-called "anti-double breasting" legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has. as its primary goal, to forcibly unionize employees of construction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hanley Act which authorizes state Right to Work hws? a. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union political 1 1. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion'? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the i 9. 1 federal anti-extonion statute'? Will you oppose legislation hat would punish or require the tiinns of employees who choose tn work durinz a srrike, and : 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, State. give union officials the power IO shut down businesses ths[ Lounty and municipal employees? ieiuse w force their employees :o pay union (dues.'

Note: The Yational Right to Work Committee. of course. endorses nu candidates. We are 3 nonpartisan organization. 9ut we believe chat you s a Right to Work supponer xe entitled to how which candidates will support the ngbr of ~'*:sr:i .\mericm to tarn a living - wilhout having IO pay union bosses for the privilege. J BACKGROWER The information below is helpful in explaining the qucstions on the reverse side of Lhis iorm.

A union. under present federal laws, is empowered to Reorganization Act of 1970 and executive orders bung back to 1 I. i represent and bind all employees in a company’s bargaining the adminisnation of President John F. Kennedy. unit including employees who oppose the union and don’t i - 6. Labor unions are the only private organization in the US. I want its “services.” which can legally force individuals to pay dues into their I This monopoly bargaining power, generally described as treasuries. “exclusive bargaining rights.” deprives employees of their right The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) proltibiLs union to bargain for themselves. Union officials fought for this power officials from giving any of these dues dollars directly to a and refuse to give it up; yet they complain they “unfairly __ are candidate for federal office. .. burdened by the legal obligation” to represent nonmembers. At the same time, FECA permits union officials to use Such complaints intended to pave the way for compelling ‘I:. are workers’ compulsory dues dollars for “in-kind” political financial support from so-called “free riders” for representation ~ spending on goods and services to elect candidafes for federal I *.+0 they donotwant. i’i offices. The fing of workers who refuse to pay union dues and/or These “in-kind” expenditures are in addition IO union PAC fees is explicitly sanctioned by both the National Labor contributions; they are seldom - if ever - documented or Relations Act and the National Railway Labor Act reponed to the Federal Election Commission. Section 7 of the NLRA. for example, stipulates that No official sz*&tics for total union “in-kind” expenditures employees shall have “the right to refrain” from participating in are available. But Labor columnist Victor Riesel estimated that union activities “except to the exzent that such right may be this so-called “soft money” amounted to 10 times more than affccted by an agreement requiring membership in a labor what union PACs gave in cash contributions. Based on that organization a a condition 3f employment.” yardstick, union “sofr money” in 1990 exceeded $350 million. The problem of compulsory unionism was created by 7. recent years, legislation has beer! Lmoduced in Congress Congress. It will not be solved until Congress repeals the In to automatically impose union representation upon existing federal authorizations of compulsory unionism. warkers of nonunionized companies which have even the slightest 3. In 21 sutes, wage earners - except those covered by the economic links to unionized companies. National Railway Labor Act - are shielded from compulsoty Even though the nonunionized and the unionized companies unionism by Right to Work laws. each perform separate and distinct work, the compulsory union The Sori& guarantee is typical of these laws, saying. “The contract would be automatically imposed upon the nonunion right of persons to work shall not be denied or abridged on workers, without even the show of an election conducted by the account of membership or nonmembership in any labor union or National Labor Relations Board to determine worker suppon labor organization.” The “anti-double bating” legislation would also encomge The authority of states to adopt and enforce such laws is Common Situs picketing by permitting union organizers t= *&e reaffirmed by Section 13@) of the Taft-Hartley amendments to a dispute with a single subcontractor as an excuse to picket md Ihe National Labor Relations Act. shut down all the other subconfractors at a job site. 4. Extortion, as a technique, is extremely useful to union 8. Legislation has been introduced repeatedly in Congress to officials in obtaining such demands as compulsory union shops, loosen the 50-ps-old Hatch Act’s restrictions against partisan “agency“ shops, compulsory hiring halls and irrevocable dues political activity by federal employees. check-off clauses. Federal union officials now wield monopoly bargaining While most criminal law is adminisrered at the state and Iccd power over federal employees. which makes union officials the level, some criminal activities (including extortion), which sole conduit for civil servants in collective bargaining and obstruct interstale. commerce, have been deemed by Congress to grievance situations. be so important that they should be covered by federal statutes. Current proposals to weaken the Hatch Act lack explicit As the federal law currently stands. union officials have prohibitions against the use of monopoly bargaining power to unique special immunities from prosecution for threatening to coerce civil servants into supporting federal union officials’ commit or committing felonies - such as murder. political agenda. manslaughter. maiming. arson. aggnvaled property destruction. 9. Legislation has been introduced in Congress that would explosives or firesrms offenses. ZIC. to obtain collective - prevent employers from hiring permanent replacement workers bargaining demands. during 3 suike. For rhc past scvenl yem. Congress has been confronted by The bill’s provisions would also penalize workers who bills designed to suthorizc :he forctd unionk’ation of public choose not !o stnke by giving preferential. post-strike hiring srnployees 31 various levels oi government. privileges to smkers. Severd or’ Ihesc proposals xc aimed it jute. ‘zounty And Since an cmployer is inlikely !o tind employees who will nunicipal employees 2nd would nullify ;xisting rute laws work during a violent suike under these conditions. employers ,which shield public mployces from anion cxxion. would be tbrc:d to cave in io every demand by union oCficiCids Other bills ,would strip posul workers md other fedem1 - including the demand Lhat workers who refuse 10 pay unicr, mplo1;ces ci the frc-dom oi choice :uxmtcd by Ihc Posd dues lx fired. Candidates for the U.S. Senate

Questloos#: 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Wyche Fowler, Jr.-D ------ Washington, DC 20510 (404) 331-0697

...... Paul Coverdell-R YYYYYYYYY .. 2804 Andrews Dr., NW Atlanta, GA 30305 (404) 320-1992

Survev Ouestions

Do you believe an employee who does not want the “services” Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulmry union dues union as his exclusive representative. which federal law now and fees for political causes and cmdidates opposed by union forces him to accept? members? Will you supporr repal of the provisions in federal laws which Will you oppose so-called “anti-double breasting” legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has, as its primary goal, to forcibly mionize employees of construction companies? Do you favor preservation of Section Id@) of the Taft-Hartley Act, which authorizes state Right to Work laws? Will you oppose legislation lo weaken or destroy the Hatch Act, which protecn federal employees from union political Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the Will you oppose legislation that would punish or require the fedenl and-exlonion sratule? tiing of employees who choose ID work during a strike, md Will you oppose the forced unionization ai fcderal. swtc. give union oificials the power to shut down busincsses that ;oun:y md muiucipal employees! refuse UJ force their employees to pay union dues’!

Note: The National Right LO Work Committee. of course, endorses no candidates. We are il nonpartisan o:gl;nization. But we believe that you s a Right to Work supporter 32e enaded (0 know which candidates will suppon [he 5ght of ever)/ .\mencan 10 rm il living - without having to pay union bosses for [he privilege.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ TO : Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road Springfield, VA 22160

From: -

Dear Reed: Thank you for updating me on the results of the Right to Work Candidate Survey. To make sure the candidates know where I stand on Right to Work issues, I have: ___ Contacted the candidates to urge them to support the Right to Work.

I_ Enclosed a contribution of:

__ $25 __ Other , , A Project of the National Right to Work Committee November 18, 1992 Ii i 1 Dear Georgia Member: 1 I'm writing you a personal letter today because I'm very concerned about how Senator Wyche Fowler will vote on compulsory- unionism legislation if he is sent to Washington as your U.S. Senator to join Big Labor President Bill Clinton.

.... i If, as a U.S. Senator, Wyche Fowler continues to vote to -:..:.,.~. hand compulsory-unionism powers to Big Labor, Georgia will ?../ ?../ i-... : - .. suffer. And so will the entire nation. i' j Until now, Senator Fowler has voted with the union hierarchy <- and against individual freedom for workers and small businesses ... .. almost every time. 5...: j 1: As one of BFq Labor's most reliable water carriers in- .-...... U.S. Senate, Senator Fowler voted to Dass Ted Kennedv's :<_. is- Pushbutton Strike bill (H.R. f/S. 55). The Strike bill failed with only two votes to spare in the Senate. ...~. ,...... ~...:: ... And in 1990, Mr. Fowler voted to allow government union chieftains to declare open season on harassing 2.9 million federal employees and thousands of U.S. taxpayers to support the union political machine by repealing the Hatch Act. Big Labor came just two votes shy of corralling enough Senators to override President Bush's veto and gut the 53-year-oldlaw. Mr. Fowler's vote in the Senate could put Big Labor over the top on these and countless other union-boss power grabs. Orsanized Labor is within a whisker of total control over our federal qoverment. Now that union bosses control the White House and have picked up strength in the Senate in the 1992 e1ections;Mr. Fowler could cast the key Senate vote t.0 enact the entire union-boss political agenda into law. Senator Fowler could vote to destroy Georgia's hard-won Right to Work law by abolishing Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act, enact the Pushbutton Strike bill, repeal the Hatch Act, or fill Big Labor's political coffers with taxpayer dollars by supporting legislation to force federal workers to pay union dues. That's why I've urged you to inundate Senator Fowler with Fhone calls, letters and postcards. Thousands of angry Georgia citizens are urging him to support Right to Work. But Senator Fowler continues to stonewall. Your protests seem to be falling on deaf ears.

8001 Braddock Road, Suite 500 a Springfield, Virginia 221 60 Tel. (800) 325-7892 Whv is Wvche Fowler isnorins YOU and the rest of the huae maioritv of Georaia citizens who omose comDu1soz-v unionism? Union operatives have stuffed $380,000 into his campaigns for the U.S. Senate. And that cash is only the tip of the iceberg. Union political pros have probably dumped ten times that amount into Senator Fowler's campaigns in the form of tlsoft"money -- partisan get-out-the-votedrives, phone banks, and full-time paid "volunteers. So while Senator Fowler is refusing to tell Right to Work supporters his position on forced unionism, union lobbyists know he'll vote anv way thev say. It's a simple (if sleazy) arrangement. He votes their way; they bankroll his congressional and senate campaigns with forced-union dues stolen from American workers.

Please call Senator Fowler now at (404) 331-0697 and Urge him to remdiate his suDport for forced unionism. Only howls and screams can make Senator Fowler renounce his cozy relationship with Big Labor. Tell Senator Fowler you won't stand for his political dirty pool of taking Big Labor backroom payoffs -- while he stonewalls Georgia citizens. Tell him he's not fooling anvbodv, and urge him to stop voting to force workers to pay union dues.

On the other hand. Mr. Fowler's ODDonent. Paul Coverdell. did reswond to his survey 100% for Risht to Work. Mr. Coverdell has promised to help Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill, fight for tougher enforcement of the Supreme Court's ban on the use of forced dues for polikics, oppose efforts to require public servants to pay union dues, and crack down on strike violence. However, Mr. Coverdell is under intense pressure from union goons to renounce his Right to Work support. It's vital that vou tell Mr. Coverdell not to back down. Please call him at (404) 320-1992 and tell him the peowle of Georsia surmort his pledqe.

P.S Senator Wyche Fowler must feel the heat from concerned citizens like you to stop voting to force workers tG pay union dues. Now is the time, in the face of a tough U.S. Senate battle, when he is most likely to mend his Washington ways. Please call him today. Dear If you haven't answered the National Right to Work Committee's Candidate Survey with 100% support for Right to Work, please do so. If you have already answered the Candidate Survey with 100% support for the Right to Work, thank you. I urge you, as a candidate for Congress] to represent my views and oppose all forms of forced unionism. I'll be watchinq to see whether YOU answer. and how you answer.

sincerely ,

Dear If you haven't answered the National Right to Work Committee's Candidate Survey with 100% support for Right to Work, please do so. If you have already answered the Candidate Survey with 100% support for the Right to Work, thank you. I urge you, as a candidate for Congress, to represent my views and oppose all forms of forced unionism. I'll be watchina to see_ whether YOU answer, and how you answer.

Sincerely,

Dear If you haven't answered the National Right to Work Committee's Candidate Survey with 100% support for Right to Work, please do so. If you have already answered the Candidate Survey with 100% support for the Right to Work, thank you. I urge you, as a candidate for Congress, to represent my views and oppose all forms of forced unionism. I'P1 be watchincr to see whether y ou answer. and how YOU answer.

Sincerely,

.. Place Stamp Here

Candidate for U.S. House of Representatives

Place Stamp Here

Candidate for W.S. House of Representatives

Place Stamp Here

candidate for U.S. nouse of Representatives GA

Candidates for the U.S. Senate

QU~QUS#:123456789 Wyche Fowler, Jr.-0 ------United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 (404) 331-0697

Paul Coverdell-R YYYYYYYYY 2804 hdrews Dr., NW Atlanta, GA 30305 (404) 320-1992

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the “services” Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a fabor union should hwe the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidates opposed by union forces him to accept? members? 2. Wili you support repeal of the provisions in feded laws which Will you oppose so-called “anti-double breasting” legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has. as its primary goal, to forcibly unionize employees of construction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley ACS which authorizes state Right to Work laws? Will you oppose legislation to weaken or desuoy the Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union political 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal anti-extonion statute? Will you oppose legislation that would punish or require the firing of employees who choose to work during a strike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state, give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse u) force their employees to pay union dues?

~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~ Note: The National Right to Work Committee. of course, endorses no wndidatcs. We are a nonpartisan organization. But we believe that you as a Right to Work supporter are entitled to know which candidates will support the right of every American to earn a living - without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. The infamation below is helpful in explaining Ihe questions on the revuse si& of lhis form. I

1. A union, under present federal laws, is empowered to Reorganization Act of 1970 and executive orders dating back to represent and bind all employees in a company’s bargaining the adrfiinismtion of President John E Kennedy. unit - including employees who oppose the union and don’t want its “services.” 6. Labor unions are the only private organization in the U.S. which can legally force individuals to pay dues into their This monopoly bargaining power, generally described as I “exclusive bargaining rights,” deprives employees of their right treasuries. 1 The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) prohibits union 1 to bargain for themselves. Union officials fought for this power officials from giving any of these dues doliars directly to a i and refuse to give it up; yet they complain they are “unfairly burdened by the legal obligluion” represent nonmembers. candidate for federal office. to At the same time, FECA permits union officials to use Such complaints intended to pave the way for compelling i ~i.1 are workers’ compulsory dues dollars for “in-kind’’ political _.I ficial support from so-called riders” for representation , ._+:. . “free spending on goods and services to elect candidates for federal they donotwant. offices. The fhgof workers who refuse to pay union dues and/or ‘yhese “in-kind” expenditures are in addition to union PAC , il fees is explicitly sanctioned by both the National Labor conaibutions; they are seldom - if ever - documented or Relations Act and the National Railway Labor Act repod to the Federal Election Commission. Section 7 of the NLRA, for example, stipulates that No official statistics for total union “in-kind” expenditures employees shall have “the right to refrain” from partkipalhg in are available. But J&or columnist Victor Riesel estimated that union activities “except to the extent that such right may be this so-called “soft money” amounted 60 10 times more than affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor what union PACs gave in cash contributions. Based on that organizarion as a condition of employment” yardstick, union “soft money” in 1990 exceeded $350 million. The problem of compulsory unionism was created by In years, legislation has introduced in Congress Congress. It will not be solved until Congress repeals the 7. recent been existing federal authorizations of compulsory unionism. to automatically impose union representation upon workers of nonunionized companies which have even the slightest In 21 states, wage eamers - except those covered by the economic links to unionized companies. National Railway Labor Act - are shielded from compulsory Even though the nonunionized and the unionized companies unionism by Right to Work laws. each perform separate and distinct work, the compulsory union ’Ihe Florida guarantee is typical of these laws, saying. ‘The contract would be automatically imposed upon the nonunion right of persons to work shall not be denied or abridged on workers, without even the show of an election conducted by Ihe account of membership or nonmembership in any labor unisn or National Labor Relations Board to determine worker support. labor organizarion.” The “ah-double breasting” legislation would also encourage The authority of states to adopt and enforce such laws is Common Situs picketing by permitting union organizers to use reaffmed by Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley amendmenls to a dspute with a single subcontractor as an excuse to picket and the National Labor Relations Act. shut down all the other subcontractors at a job site. 3. Extortion, as a technique, is extremely useful to union 8. Legislation has been inuoduced repeatedly in Congress to officials in obtaining such demandrj as compulsory union shops. lmsen the 50-year-old Hatch Act’s restrictions against padsan ”agency” shops, compukoty hiring halls and irrevocable dues political activity by federal employees. check-off clauses. Federal union officials now wield monopoly bargaining While most criminal law is administered at the state and local power over federal employees, which makes union offkids be level, some criminal activities (including extortion), which sole conduit for civil servants in callective bargaining and obstruct interstate commerce, have been deemed by Congress to grievance situations. be so important that they should be covered by federal statutes. Current proposals to weaken the Hatch Act lack explicit As the federal law currently stands, union officials have prohibitions against the use of monopoly bargaining power to unique special immunities from prosecution for threatening to coerce civil servants into supporting federal union officials’ commit or committing felonies - such as murder, ptitical agenda. manslaughter, maiming. arson, aggravated property desmction, explosives or firarms offenses, etc. - to obtain collective 9. Legislation has been introduced in Congress that would bargaining demands. prevent employers from hiring permanent replacement workers during a strike. 5. For the past several years, Congress has been confronted by The bill’s provisions would also penalize workers who bills designed to authorize the forced unionization of public choose not to strike by giving preferential. post-mike hiring employees at various levels of government. privileges to strikers. Several of these proposals are aimed at state, county and Since an employer is unlikely to find employees who will municipal employees and would nullify existing state laws work during a violent suike under these comditions, employers which shield public employees from union coercion. would be forced to cave in to every demml by union officials Other bills would strip posfal workers and other federal - inciuding the demand that workers who refuse to pay union employees of the freedom of choice guaranteed by the Postal dues be fired. I. ,/ 5

TO : Reed Carson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road

..i: Springfield, VA 22160 From:

Dear Reed: Thank you for updating me on the results of the Right to Work Candidate Survey. To make sure the candidates know where 1: stand on Right to Work issues, I have: -Contacted the candidates to urge them to support the Right to Work. - Enclosed a contribution of: - $200 __ $100 $50 - $25 __ Other

Please make checks payable and return CQ: "WC 9 December 2, 1992 To : Executive Committee From: Karl Gallant Re: Federal Legislation

Introduction As the smoke clears from the 1992 Federal Election scene, we find ...... ourselves gazing upon a political landscape unlike any we have seen i:.l .. in some time. L1:.-,.. .J ._... h..J _- Despite modest GOP gains in the House, and a net draw in the 8- ! Senate, the Democrats Still maintain a firm majority in both federal legislative bodies. George Bush's political tailspin has given Bill Clinton the White House. For the first time in twelve years, the party of Kennedy and Metzenbaunn controls the entire federal government. The good news for the Right to Work cause has been the success of our aggressive Federal Survey program, which focused heavily on securing enough pledges from newly-elected Senators to keep us within range of mounting a successful filibuster against the union bosses' Pushbutton Strike Bill. In this report to you, I would 1.ike to analyze the Federal elections results, recap the flurry of legislative activity we experienced at the dose of the last Congress, and look ahead to the new dangers facing us in 1993.

I. Federal Election Results A. Senate

In Georgia, last week's Punoff vietory bf pro-Right to Work Paul Coverdell over Wyche Fowler gives the GO2 44 votes in the Senate, identical to their margin in the last Congress. The defeat of Fowler helps compensate for the loss of anti Strike Bill votes in Wisconsin (Bob Kasten), and in California (John Seymour). Also, pro-RTW Lauch Faircloeh in North Carolina defeated Terry Sanford, an ally of Big Labor. Sanford voted against the Strike Bill in this election year, but would have defected once safely back in his Senate seat for another six years.

1 fD Unfortunately, open seat races in California and Colorado produced disappointing results, with pro-Right to Work Republicans (Bruce Herschensohn and Temy Considine) getting dragged down by Bush's free-fall and thus losing to Big Labor militants ( and Ben Nighthorse Campbell).

However, retiring pro-RTW Senators in Utah and Idaho, (Jake Garn and Steve synuns) were replaced by pro-worker candidates (Bob Bennett and Dirk Kempthorne). Also in the plus column, New Hampshire Governor Judd ereggs who killed a state RTW bill, was farced by our survey program to pledge his opposition to the Strike Bill. (Retiring New Hampshire Senator was a consistent [pro-~wvote. ) TO sum up, we lost two anti-Strike Bill votes in Wisconsin and California, but we gained back those two votes in North Carolina and Georgia. In addition, we hope that the near-defeat of Fritz iiollings by a pro-RTW challenger will shore up the South Carolina Senator's increasingly unreliable vote on our issues. At this time, we count 37 solid votes against cloture on the Strike Bill -- an excellent base from which to mount our drive to secure the 41 votes we need to sustain the filibuster. B. House The massive infusion of new blood into the House this year yielded Only insignificant gains for the GOP -- just 10 seats. Key factors in the disappointing results for the GOP were Bush's abysmal performance in California, and the Democrats' total control of the redistricting process in Texas. Two positive developments for RTW did occur. First, dozens of fresh new RTW supporters were elected. These people will provide a fertile recruiting ground for bill sponsorship, fundraising assistance, and other forms of Right to Work activism. Even more important, these freshmen may very well provide the balance of power to catapult RTW activists like Dick Anney, Tom Delay, and Bill Paxon into House GOP Leadership positions.

11. Legislative Wrap Up for 102nd Congress As you recall from my September report, our major legislative concerns had been resolved by the start of autumn. However, we did face a blitzkrieg of relatively obscure, but very significant eleventh-hour attempts by the union bosses to increase their coercive powers.

2 0 A. Lobby Discloswe. A bill by Senator Levin to hamstring the free speech of voluntary groups like NaTWC through onerous reporting requirements was passed out of the Government Affairs Committee. Federal Legislation used Senate holds to block the bill from the Senate floor. B. Digital Audio Tape. A bill that required the collection of royalties on the sale and distribution of computer-driven musical recording equipment and tapes, would also have diverted a huge portion of *.ese royalties directly into the treasuries of the Musicians' union and the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists# union, with no strings attached. With the help of Senator Helms of North Carolina and Senator Smith of New Hampshire, Federal Legislation blacked passage of the bill until its proponents adopted language requiring the funds to be paid to an escrow account, to be administered by a manager independent of the unions, to be paid directly to artists, whether or not they are members of the union.

C. Expanding the NW. Federal Legislation blocked a bill that would have forced employees of foreign vessels to pay dues to United States union bosses. While American workers would not have been involved, the bill would have increased Big Labor's compulsory dues warchest. D. Teacher Union t*EducationllBill. Federal Legislation helped line UP votes against cloture to end debate on a bill that would have authorized tens of millions of tax dollars to subsidize the NE% bosses' political agenda. Cloture failed by a margin of 59-40. E. Hetzenbaum Bankruptcy Amendment. Senator Metzenbaum attached an eleventh-hour amendment to a bankruptcy reform bill that would have put union collective bargaining contracts ahead of all other creditors in bankruptcy proceedings. The amendment slipped through the Senate, but Congressmen Dannemeyer and Delay killed it by objecting to unanimous consent on consideration of the bill in the House. F. ERISA Pre-emption. Federal Legislation helped line up Senate holds on a bill that would have allowed union ofricials to pass state laws requiring construction apprentices to become members of the union in order to receive the training they need to get jobs.

111. Coming- Attraction in the 103rd Congress. While we remain well within range of maintaining our filibuster against the Strike Bill in the next Congress -- or against any other attempt to amend the MLRA to give union bosses more power to force workers to pay dues -- we may lose ground on issues like Hatch Act and Campaign Reforin where union bosses are attempting to bend the rules of the political game more in their favor.

3 9 9 Since these political rules changes also generally cut against the GOP as well, in the past Congress we were able to coalesce with enough Senate Republicans to sustain Presidential vetoes. Under Clinton, we do not have that veto cover. A. Strike Bill. Look for this bill to be introduced and moved through the House and Senate Labor Committees eaxly in the session. It remains a top priority for the AFL-CIO. However, Clinton will try to avoid getting bogged down on labor law fights early in his Administration, so we probably will not see floor action on the bill until later this year,at the earliest.

~l .. ..~.-. 8. Hatch Act Repeal. Our Senate Republican allies may be able to .... :/-.... delay and further water down Hatch Act repeal, but Clinton has ..._ . TI.. promised to deliver this one to the postal. union bosses. There will probably be too many GOP defections fcx us to successfully filibuster. This issue will come out of the chutes early in the session. C. Campaign Deform. The term limits movement, and public rage Over

. .. Congressional scandals is putting the heat on Congress to reform iLi itself. Senior congatessmen want to pass some kind of campaign law revisions that can masquerade as r@fom, while actually further entrenching incumbents who survived this year's eiection. Further restrictions on PAC contributions seems likely, but the whole campaign reform issue could bog down over taxpayer financing of elections. We will continue to highlight the need for reform of forced dues politics, especially if Clinton deletes Bush's recent steps to implement the decision. D. Lobby Disclosure. Look for Big Labor Democrats to try again to hoist the banner of reform with a bill to knock the NRTWC out of operation with onerous, one sided lobby reporting requirements. The legislature could possibly require US to disclose our contributor lists to the Big Labor-controlled Congress. We could face this issue very early next year. E. Senate Rules Changes. Because the Big Labor Democrats failed to completely knock out our filibuster capability, we are on full alert against any attempts by them to weaken the power of minority factions in the Senate to impact the legislative process. A drive to weaken the Senate Rules that protect filibusters, and to impose qermaneness requirements on Senate amendments, are distinct possibilities when the Senate reconvenes in January. F. Unraveling of Beck regulations. In October, President Bush belatedly finalized regulations requiring union bosses to meaningfully report political expenditures ta the Department of Labor. Also, the DOL has been printing and distributing official government notices concerning && rights to federal contractors. We can expect Clinton to immediately begin to wipe out these gains,

4 % 9 while he also tries to further enhance Big Labor's grip in the National Labor Relations Board. Clinton will have at least two NLRB terms to €ill when he taxes the oath of office in January.

i

5 i7-1 I ._ j -......

;?.A; BEPOIRE TEE IFEDERAE ELECTION CQMMISSIQN

&.?.> -.&.?.> .. In the Matter of ) f'! b_i- Witness Subpoena to ) MUR 3774 c.: The National Right to) 31&I Work Committee ) aetd hn,Reeident

October 30, 1992

Tonight I had a very disturbing emergency meeting with my attorneys. I'm staying later than usual this evening to get this letter off to you immediately because I must make a critical decision right away that will affect you and all our members. My decision will depend solely upon your advice . . . and your financial support. That's why I've enclosed a special Membership Authorization Form. Here's what's going on: The union bosses' favorite federal bureaucracy is at it again. Big Labor's Federal El@ction Commission operatives are continuing their 17-year battle to silence your National Right to Work Committee. My attorneys told me toniqht that the union-boss puppets at the Federal Election Commission will order me to stop mobilizinq hundreds of thousands of Americans aqainst union-boss power grabs in Congress. In fact, the FEC would actually prohibit us from reporting to you or any other American which Senators and Congressmen support Right to Work -- and which ones don't. I will not even be allowed to tell you and your neighbors how candidates for the House and Senate have voted on Right to Work, so you can urge them to oppose compulsory unionism when the candidates are most likely to listen. The FEC is tryinq to cripple our ability to stop danqerous union leqislation in Congress. ~f we continue to oppose union- boss power qrabs in Conqress as we have in the past, I face the danqer of multimillion-dollar fines and a jail term!

Washington D.C. Headquarters * 8001 Bnddock Road. Suite 500 Q SpMgtield. Virginia 22160 (703) 321-9820 Page 2

In fact, I may even be questioned in court for writing this letter tonight. I must make a decision soon. Should I allow the Federal Election Commission to tie my hands during 1993? Or should I defy their regulations . e . and face prosecution by the federal bureaucracy? Please give me your answer on the enclosed Membership Authorization Form and return it in the self-addressed envelope. If you and other members want me to proceed with our efforts to block anti-Right to Work legislation in the Congress (and I hope you do), I will also need your financial help. So please enclose a generous contribution for this battle, if you can.

.,... .. This threat by the FEC bureaucrats proves that Big Labor is ..... preparing for a political attack far more serious than the -..._ .. , ..i.. Kennedy-Metzenbaum Pushbutton Strike bill, which they came within three votes of ramming through Congress last year. Here's why I'm concerned: The union bosses are still flush with cash after amassinq .. ~. ii. .. the bigqest election war chest in history in 1992. The mob- ..__ . ?: ht.s ::I :., dominated Teamster union joined with the AFL-CIO to build the most powerful political machine in America. The Teamster union president vowed to "create the greatest political giant this country has ever seen." The union brass is making a grab for the power to launch -- and win -- violent, cripplinq strikes nationwide. Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike Sill has majority support in both houses of Congress and could be rubber-stamped into law early next year. The union bosses are seeking to transform the federal bureaucracy into the political arm of the AFL-CIO. Congress -- with certain support from the Clinton Administration -- is close to repealing the Hatch Act, which protects public servants from political arm-twisting by government union officials. This could ne a "do or die" session of Conqress. If the union bosses give themselves such power over the electoral system, Big Labor would get a lock grip on our government lasting for decades. If I don't begin immediately to build opposition to the union bosses' "wishlist," we will lose battle after battle in quick order. Page 3

Time and time again, you have stopped these power grabs dead because you have written or called your elected representatives in response to my letters to you from the National Right to Work Committee. Now, the union bosses are trying to silence me . . . and you. This year, you and I held of€ several union-boss schemes by razor-thin margins. Next year we face defeat on many of these same bills . . . if the FEC bureaucrats succeed. What AFL-CIO power brokers would do with all this power is _. no secret: ...... :/ -.~. ..Ii... . *** DRIVE THE ECONOMY FURTHER INTO RECESSION. The Pushbutton ..:. -> . :, Strike bill (H.R. 5/S. 55) would force employers to fire workers on union-boss orders -- and would cripple the nation .. .. with violent, job destroying strikes. ...- ..~. ...~..~. . :I *** PARALYZE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WITH ILLEGAL STRIKES. Strikes by police, fire fighter and teacher unions have ~..-. paralyzed cities for 15 years. Now, the union elite is , :,i_i .... trying to expand their power by ramming the Federal Forced 1. Dues bill (H.R. 3672) through Congress, requiring all 2.9 million federal workers to pay dues -- or be fired. *** OUTLAW 21 STATE RIGHT M WORK LAWS IN ONE FELL SWOOP. Not since 1978 have the union iobbyists controlled so many votes in the House and Senate. If they elect just a handful more of their cronies, they will be able to repeal Section 14 (b) of the Taft-Hartley Act which authorizes states to enact Right to Work laws. I am deeply concerned. if Biq Labor can grab such enorwrpus power in 1993, there will be virtually no check on their political machine in the years ahead. The union bosses will crush any candidate running for Congress who dares oppose them. The union bosses are already licking their chops. Unless we act quickly, the bureaucrats at the Federal Election Commission will make it impossible for us to stop these dangerous schemes in Congress. Our program to stop union power grabs in Congress is simple. Because seven out of every ten Americans support Right to Work, we can put a lot of heat on individual Congressmen and Senators. The FEC insists we can’t do that anymore during election years. They say by tellinq you where your Conqressmen and Senators stand on Right to Work, I may influence your vote. The FEC election regulators contend that’s illegal electioneerinq. Page 4

Basically, the union bureaucrats have demanded that I dismantle our lobbying operation during election years -- precisely at the time it has its greatest impact. Naturally, this ruling applies only to groups like the National Right to Work Committee. Union officials, by contrast, are free to spend all the forced dues they can t= buy elections. Top legal experts tell me that this attempt by union puppets in the FEC to shut down our program violates several decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court and is flatly unconstitutional. :,...~ .... ., !:; But they also warn me that if I challenge the FEC rulings', I .. ~ . >i.. .. may face a huge, tax-funded lawsuit which could stretch on for :.~., . ;! decades and cost us as much as $430,000.

.. In addition to potential million-dollar fines and legal ..... penalties, I also face an enormous funding challenge. Our ... .. I' i program to keep Congress from "giving away the store" to union bosses will require at least $2.9 million. Despite the financial burdens and legal risks, I think we must qo forward with our proqram to stop union-boss legislation In 1993. The union bosses must not be allowed to take ov@r small businesses, destroy our economy, raise our taxes, and extort money from American workers.

But this i5 your National Right to Work Committee, not mine. I cannot and will not take this step without your authorization. That's why I've enclosed your Membership Authorization Form. You must help me make this agonizing decision: Give in to the union bosses and endanger our nation's future; or face an enormous, expensive lawsuit by the federal election regulators? If I am to qo forward with this effort (which I am hopin you will allow), I will need more than just your authorizatio:. I will need your financial support as well. Our battles against the Pushbutton Strike bill and the union's Hatch Act Repeal bill this year have left me with no resources to continue in 1993. And without your emergency contribution, it will be very difficult, if not impossible, to fight the union bosses in Congress and wage an expensive legal battle in the courts. I desperately need your advice and financial assistance. Here's what I'm hoping you will do today: 1) Sign and return the Membership Authorization Form. I need your backing to go ahead with our glans to fight the union-boss agenda in Congress 9- even if we must defend the Committee against costly lawsuits. 2) Enclose the larqest contribution you can possibly afford to support this major program and possible trial. I'm hoping you will be able to help with a special contribution of $600 or at least $300. But perhaps you could afford even more. Every dollar, every quarter, every dime will be used to defeat dangerous union-boss schemes in Congress. lease respond soon. This is one of the most far- tions I have ever had to pose to you. The future of Right to Work is at stake. If the people are heard, I am sure Right to Work will survive. But if the union bosses silence the American people -- even for just one year -- more workers will be forced to pay union tribute to keep their jobs; our government will again be dominated by radical union puppets: small businessmen wiil face a new wave of union regulations, vandalism and strikes; the recession will deepen and union bosses will once again fill their bank accounts with your tax dollars. Only action by National Right to Work Committee members like you can stand in their way. So I hope your answer will be: PRQOCEEIP. The danger we face from a union-controlled Congress is far too menacing for us to hesitate . Without your authorization and your personal contribution, the union bosses will succeed in silencing our voices in 1993. Please let me know where you stand, today.

Reed Larson P.S. Please don't delay. Without your permission to act (and a special contribution of $600, if possible), the FEC bureaucrats will shut down our efforts to defeat the union-boss agenda in Congress in 1993. FROM: I .D.# H3023 01605 SMTH099J

TO: Reed Larsoa National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road, #500 Springfield, VA 22160

Reed, as a member of the National Right to Work Committee, I authorize you to generate massive public opposition to compulsory unionism in the 1993 Congress and to inform the American people how their Congressmen and Senators vote on Right to Work. And. to help cover the costs of this program and the legal battle which may ensue, I am enclosing a special contribution of: $600 $300 Other

MEMBER SIGNATURE

DATE

(Please make checks payable to NRTWC.)

8001 Braddwk Road, Suite SO0 * Springfield, Virginia 25160 (403)321-9820 c&lhuhons am not tax deductiblc as chmlablemnlnbuhons Dear Member: No time to explain. The FEC's legal vendetta has drained over $470,000 from the Committee's bank accounts. ! ,_ Because Judge Jackson is expected to nile any day, leading to an almost certain and expensive appeal, 1: fear the costs of this t Big Labor attack will only escalate.

Your advice and immediate contribution 1 E:: are needed now more than ever. Please answer "I. .- my letter immediately.

You must help me decide. i Should I Let the FEC bureaucrats succeed in silencing Right to Work supporters in 1993? Or should I go forward with next year's massive battle against compulsory- unionism legislation in Congress -- and risk fines and more huge attorney bills? Please let me have your answer today.

BEFORE3 TNE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Cii In the Matter of ) -2 i:7[._ Witness Subpoena to ) MUR 3114 The National Right to) ?_i, i;l WorkCommittee ) <:: <:: , .! -.L1

DOCUMENTS FROM NRTWC

DEPART 3?- 4?- 5?- 6-, 7- 8-

i i2zi I :'. 1 .# Thank you for taking my call yesterday

..<. And thanks for agreeing to sign the petitions to the Senate

:.....I-.. :,. and President-elect Bill Clintor? to help me mobilize opposition nationally to Big Labor's legislative blitzkrieg when Congress 31.. convenes just weeks from now...... _.... r:, r:, But I'll need more than your petitions. I'll need your ...- a generous financial help as well. .- b> El With Bill Clinton's election, and Big Labor picking up 5ks strength in the U.S. Senate, you and I now face our toughest battle in 16 years to Dreserve our Risht to Work. Up to now, we were outgunned in the House arid Senate. But we had just enough strength to (barely) sustain a veto or filibuster when necessary. Now there is no margin of safety. With Bill Clinton and the new Congress about to take office in January, you and I must move fast to get ready. Big Labor's game plan for the new union-label Congress is very clear -- and very alarming: Target Number 1 -- The Ted Kennedy Pushbutton Strike-. Big Labor's Strike bill would give union czars the power to punish or fire workers who refuse to go on strike. If passed, the Ted Kennedy- Strike bill would empower union militants to call any strike they wish and win every strike they call -- as easy as pushing a button. You and hundreds of thousands of Right to Work members united last year to stop the Strike bill in the Senate -- by a margin of only 3 votes.

-Tarset Number 2 -- Hatch Act ReDeal. Destroying the federal Hatch Act would conscript 2.9 million

WASHINGTON D.C.HEhDQUAR?TRS: 8001 BRADWCK ROAD. SUITE 500 SPRINGFIELD. VIRGINIA 22160 TEL (703) 321-9820 Somehow, you and I must stov them. That's where our National Mobilization Plan will play such a critical role. Here's the game plan:

1) You and I must slow the union lobbyists down in Congress. Even though our side is heavily outgunned in Congress, there are still ways to delay and stall legislation. We must gum up the machinery at every stage, to buv time to alert the vublic. 2) Next, you and I must mobilize the 75% of Americans who support Right to Work. Survey after survey shows you an8 I have a solid majority behind us. But unless they are warned about the union elite's plans, and given the tools to fight back, Big Labor will steamroll its power grabs into law. 3) Then we focus public opposition on Capitol Bill. If you and I turn the heat up high enough, we can turn the votes we need and stop Big Labor's agenda. Everv politician has a melting point -- they can only withstand much pressure from their constituents. . . . And it's our job (yours and mine) to turn up the heat to reach that melting point. You and I and the vast body of Americans who agree with us must keep pouring on the pressure until Congress has no choice but to listen to the people who pay their salaries.

But we must start now -- t:odav. And it all besins with YOU and the uetitions vou hold in your hands. I need your signed petitions to the U.S. Senate to turn the heat all the way up -- and make the Senate see the light. The politicians need to be reminded that Right to Work members are watching their every move -- and will be outraged if they hand Big Labor the power grabs it wants. Your signed petition to President-elect Clinton is also very important. As Governor of Arkansas, Mr. Clinton never dared attack his state's Right to Work law. It was too popular, and the prosperity it fostered was just too important to the workers, families and small business owners of Arkansas. I've already sent matsrials to the printer. I'm prepared for a SO-state offensive. You and I must move fast if we're going to be ready to flood Capitol Hill with protest petitions on January 5.

That's whv- I need vour contribution of $16-.OO, S15-.00 or

I_12- riqht away. Your contribution will help pay for the phone banks, printing, postage and countless other costs of alerting 167,000 Americans in a. few sh-rt weeks. The danger you and I face is even greater than when Jimmy Carter sat in the White House. With Bill Clinton as our new President, I can only see victory after victory for Big Labor...... Unless, with your help, I can mobilize all the Committee's 1.7 million members -- and hundreds of thousands of -additional Americans who agree with us, but who aren't vet Dart of

Iour coalition. I need your signed petitions to the new Senate and President - - -and your contribution of $16-.OO, $15-.00 or 12- -- today.

The war to defend Right to Work begins now. You and 1 must mobilize immediately. Please respond today. Sincerely,

&LReed Larson P.S. Now that Bill Clinton has been elected President, nothing stops Congress from enacting the union elite's forced- unionism agenda . . . nothing except you. First they'll push Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill, which would gut all state Right to Work laws, and give union "organizers" the power to blackmail businesses into forcing their employees to pay union dues. If the union lobbyists win that one, they'll try to destroy -all state Right to Work laws by repealing Taft-Hartley Section 14 (b). I need your signed petitions to deliver to the Senate and the President-elect.

And . must have your contribution of $16--00, $15-.OO or 12- TODAY so I can launch a nationwide mobilization to stop Congress from selling America out to Big Labor. *,-

.. . ..

-L :' ._. .. , .

1I November 12, 1992 I Mr. XxxXX XXXXXX XXXX xxw[ Xxxxx Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55419

Dear XXXXWWOO[: * --1 Thank you for taking my call yesterday and agreeing to sign the enclosed petitions which I have prepared in your name. And thanks, also, for your pledge of $50.00 to help mobilize additional opposition nationally to Big Labor's legislative blitzkreig before Congress convenes just weeks from now. With Bill Clinton's election, and with Big Labor's picking up strength in the U:S. Senate, you and I now face our toushest battle in 16 vears to preserve our Ricrht to Work. Up to now, we were outgunned in the House and Senate. But. we had just enough strength to (barely) sustain a veto or filibuster when necessary. Now there is no marsin of safety. With Bill Clinton and the new Congress about to take office in January, you and I must move fast to get ready. Big Labor's game plan for the new union-label Congress is very clear -- and very alarming:

Tarqet Number 1 -- The Ted Kennedv Pushbutton Strike bill. Big Labor's Strike bill would give union czars the power to punish or fire workers who refuse to go on strike. If passed, the Ted Kennedy-Howard Metzenbaum Strike bill would empower union militants to call any strike they wish and win every strike they call -- as easy as pushing a button. You and hundreds of thousands of Right to Work members united last year to stop the Strike bill in the Senate -- by a margin of only 3 votes. Tarset Number 2 -- Hatch Act ReDeal. Destroying the federal Hatch Act would conscript 2.9 million Somehow, vou and I must stou them. That's where our National Mobilization Plan will play such a critical role. Here's the game plan:

1) You and I must slow the union lobbyists down in Congress. Even though our side is heavily outgunned in Congress, there are still ways to delay and stall legislation. We must gum up the machinery at every stage, to buy time to alert the mblic. 2) Next, you and I must mobilize the 75% of Americans who support Right to Work. Survey after survey shows you and I have a solid majority behind us. But unless they are warned about the union elite's plans, and given the tools to fight back, Big Labor will steamroll its power grabs into law. 3) Then we focus public opposition on Capitol Hill. If you and I turn the heat up high enough, we can turr? the votes we need and stop Big Labor's agenda. Everv politician has a melting point -- they can only withstand much pressure from their constituents. . . . And it's our job (yours and mine) to turn up the heat to reach that melting point.

You and I and the vast body of Americans who agree with US mmt keep pouring on the pressure until Congress has no choice but to listen to the people who pay their salaries. But we must start now -- todav. And it all besins with vou and the Detitions vou hold in vour hands. I need your signed petitions to the U.S. Senate to turn the heat all the way up -- and make the Senate see the light. The politicians need to be reminded that Right to Work members are watching their every move -- and will be outraged if they hand Big Labor the power grabs it wants. Your signed petition to President-elect Clinton is also very important. As Governor of Arkansas, Mr. Clinton never dared attack his state's Right to Work law. It was too popular, and the prosperity it fostered was just too important to the workers, families and small business owners of Arkansas. Based on your pledge of $50.00, I've already sent materials to the printer. I'm prepared for a 50-state offensive. You and I must move fast if we're going to be ready to flood Capitol Hill with protest petitions on January 5.

So Dlease return riqht awav the $50.00 contribution- pledaed vesterdav. Your $50.00 will pay for the phone banks, printing, postage and countless other costs of alerting 167,000 Americans in a few short weeks. The danger you and I face is even greater than when Jimmy Carter sat in the White House. With Bill Clinton as our new President, I can only see victory after victory €or Big Labor ...... Unless, with-vour help. I can mobilize all the Committee's 1.7 millicm members -- and hundreds of thousands of additional Americans who aqree with us, but whoaren't yet part of our coalition.

..- : I need your signed petitions to the new Senate and the new , ..I <:: <:: j President -- and your contribution of $50.00 -- todav. , . .. . The war to defend Right to Work begins now. You and I must mobilize immediately. Please respond today.

A Sincerely,

. Reed Larson P.S. Now that Bill Clinton has been elected President, nothing stops Congress from enacting the union elite's forced- unionism agenda . . . nothing except you. First they'll push Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill, which would gut state Right to Work laws, and give union "organizers" the power to blackmail businesses i.nto forcing their employees to pay union dues. If the union lobbyists win that one, they'll try to destroy -all state Right to Work laws by repealing Taft-Hartley Section 14 (b). I need your signed petitions to deliver to the Senate and the President-elect. And I must have your $50.00 pledge TODAY so I can launch a nationwide mobilization to stop Congress from selling America out to Big Labor. Reed Larson National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite SO0 Springfield, VA 22160

Mr. xXXXX XXXXXX XXXX XxxXX xXXXX Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55419

A 1109 XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Reed, now that Big Labor has complete control of Congress and the White House, the only way you and I are going to stop the union bosses from getting everything they want is to mobilize hundreds of thousands more Americans to join our fight . I've signed the attached petitions to the Senate and President-elect Bill Clinton for you to deliver when Congress reconvenes in January.

To helr, YOU launch the Nationwide Mobilization of tens of thousands more Americans to stor, Consress from sellinq out America to the union bosses, I am:

I_ including my pledged contribution of $50.00 - increasing my contribution to:

[ 1 $100.00 [ 1 $150.00 I I Other

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC Big Labor is expecting Congress to ratify its compulsory unionism agenda. including the Ted Kennedy- Howard Metzenbaum Strike bill, the Hatch Act Repeal bill and the Federal Fobced Dues bill. and Congressional leadership, already beholden to Big Labor, is now even more likely to give Ihe union high command whatever it wants, and Caving in to the union special interests would bankrupt small businesses, hike taxes, send inflation sky- ward, cripple American competitiveness, and send good jobs overseas. and Seventy-five percent of all Americans support the Right to Work - and oppose giving mom coercive power to union officials, THEREFORE: As your constituent. I urge you to heed the vast majority of Americans who oppose compulsory unionism by fighting the forced-unionism power grabs that union lobbyists will be introducing in this session of

Mr. XXXXX XXXXXX Minneapolis

...

whereas: Big Labor is expecting Congress to ratify its compulsosy unionism agenda, including the Ted Kennedy- Howard Meaenbaum Strike bill, the Hatch Act Repal biU and the Federal Forced Dues bill, and whereas: Congressional leadership. already beholden to Big Labor, is now even more. likely to give the union high command whatever it wants. and whereas: Caving in to the union special interests would bankrupt small businesses, hike taxes. send inflation sky- ward, cripple American competitiveness, and send good jobs overseas, and wherPA3.s: Seventy-five percent of all Americans support the Right 10 Work - and oppose giving more coercive power to union officials, THEREFORE: As your constituent. I urge you to heed the vast majority of Americans who oppose compulsory unionism by fighting the forced-unionism power grabs that union lobbyists will k introducing in this session of Congress.

-:--- ~ -- -- City state __ \ ' 3- Ps 4- 5- 6-, 7- 8- :i j , i...... -., .:;:> Dear 3-: .- .....7.-i . i, Thank you for speaking with my assistant yesterday.

- si:. And thanks for agreeing to consider signing petitions to the ...:%l- .. Senate and President-elect Bill Clinton to help me mobilize i;!i.i opposition nationally to Big Labor's legislative blitzkrieg when i Congress convenes just weeks from now. ...~. -...... _...~ ;:- j But I'll need more than your petitions. I'll need your generous financial help as well. With Bill Clinton's election, and Big Labor picking up strength in the U.S. Senate, you and I now face our toushest battle in 16 vears to Dieserve our Riqht to Work. Up to now, we were outgunned in the House and Senate. But we had just enough strength to (barely) sustain a veto or filibuster when necessary. Now there is no marsin of safety. With Bill Clinton and the new Congress about to take office in January, you and I must move fast to get ready. Big Labor's game plan for the new union-label Congress is very clear -- and very alarming :

Tarset Number 1 -- The Ted Kennedv Pushbutton Strike bill. Big Labor's Strike bill would give union czars the power to punish or fire workers who refuse to go on strike. If passed, the Ted Kennedy-Howard Metzenbaum Strike bill would empower union militants to call any strike they wish and win every strike they call -- as easy as pushing a button. You and hundreds of thousands of Right to Work members united last year to stop the Strike bill in the Senate -- by a margin of only 3 votes. Tarset Number 2 -- Hatch Act Repeal. Destroying the federal Hatch Act would conscript 2.9 million

WASHINGTON D.C. HMDQUAKTEW 8001 SRADWCK ROAD. SUITE 500 * FPRINGFIELC. VlRGlNU 22160 * TEL (703) 321-9820 federal workers into the union political machine. And it would expose countless private citizens to political harassment from federal bureaucrats who are also union officials.

This scheme came within 2 votes of becoming law in 1990. Now Big Labor has even more votes in the Senate. We may be able to turn it around, but it won't be easy. Tarqet Number 3 -- The Federal Forced Dues bill. Introduced by Rep. Patsy Mink (D-) last session, the Federal Forced Dues bill would empower government union chiefs to coerce all federal employees to pay union dues -- or lose their jobs . Of course, that means 2.9 million federal employees will owe their jobs to Big Labor -- not to the taxpayers. Imagine what'll happen to your taxes when the federal government is taking orders from the union brass -- not you or your elected representatives. What will veterans, retirees and others do when federal agencies, VA hospitals, and other vital services are shut down by bitter strikes? (Of course, strikes will be illegal -- but thac's never stopped the union brass before!) The trillion-dollar federal government will become Biq Labor's Drouertv -- available to build and expand the unioQ bosses' coercive emuire. Then the union high command, their appetite for power whetted, would go for the big prize . . . Tarqet Number 4 -- Reueal of Taft-Hartley Section 14(b). Taft-Hartley 14(b) enables states to enact Right to Work laws. tow,wiDe out all 21 state Riqht to Work laws-. By wiping out Section 14(b), Big Labor's ambition is to lock down every Right to Work state as union-boss territory, ready for union "organizers" to invade and conquer. And Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'll sign repeal of Taft-Hartley Section 14(b) as soon as it reaches his desk. In the past, you and I fought heavy odds just to hold back these job-killing, economy-wrecking, coercive bills -- but we did hold them back. Now we again face a desperate fight. The new Congress will be ready and eager to give Big Labor everything it wants. 3 Somehow, YOU and I must stop them. That's where our National Mobilization Plan will play such a critical role. Here's the game plan:

1) You and I must slow the union lobbyists down in Congress. Even though our side is heavily outgunned in Congress, there are still ways to delay and stall legislation. We must gum up the machinery at every stage, to buy time to alert the public.

2) Next, you and I must mobilize the 75% of Americans who support Right to Work. Survey after survey shows you and I have a solid majority behind us. But unless they are warned about the union elite's plans, and given the tools to fight back, Big Labor will steamroll its power grabs into law. 3) Then we focus public opposition on Capitol Hill. If you and I turn the heat up high enough, we can turn the votes we need and stop Big Labor's agenda. Everv politician has a melting point -- they can only withstand much pressure from their constituents. . . . And it's our job (yours and mine) to turn up the heat to reach that melting point. You and I and the vast body of Americans who agree with us must keep pouring on the pressure until Congress has no choice but to listen to the people who pay their salaries.

But we must start now -- today. And it all beqins with YOU and the petitions YOU hold in your hands. I need your signed petitions to the U.S. Senate to turn the heat all the way up -- and make the Senate see the light. The politicians need to be reminded that Right to Work members are watching their every move -- and will be outraged if they hand Big Labor the power grabs it wants. Your signed petition to President-elect Clinton is also very important. As Governor of Arkansas, Mr. Clinton never dared attack his state's Right to Work law. It was too popular, and the prosperity it fostered was just too important to the workers, families and small business owners of Arkansas. I 1-

That's why, if you and I do our job, we can convince President-elect Clinton of the foolishness of picking a fight with 75% of the American people. When Bill Clinton hears from hundreds of thousands of pro- Riqht to Work Americans, he may not be auite so eager to expend his political capital carryinq- water for Biq Labor. So please sign and return the petitions to the Senate and President-elect Bill Clinton today. I also need to mobilize hundreds of thousands of additional Americans. I can't do that until I have vour financial support.

I ..! ~ -1 Before Election Day, I committed every resource I had to try , :.. jii -8 to avert Big Labor's election steal. The Committee mailed nearly 2 million candidate information packets to Right to Work supporters in all 50 states to enlist their help in turning around their candieates. Organized Labor made big gains in the U.S. Senate, but our efforts helped avert an even worse disaster. Even though we're outnumbered in the Senate, we are still within striking distance of turning around enough votes to stall and even stop forced- unionism legislation. But the result is that Committee bank accounts are virtually empty -- with hundreds of thousands of dollars in bills to pay! With your contribution, I will be able to begin warning hundreds of thousands of Americans, who aren't members of the National Right to Work Committee, about the threat. You and I must mobilize more citizens to join forces with us. We must turn on the heat, raise our voices to a deafening roar, and put all the pressure we can on Washington. It's the only way you and I can stop Congress from obeying the union lobbyists. After all, most Americans aqree with us. But I don't think they realize how dangerous the situation is. By telephone, by mail, by every means we can, you and I must enlist the pro-Right to Work majority in our cause. Otherwise we'll lose. And the union bosses will win. I'm preparing to call approximately 167,000 Americans before Congress convenes. And I'll write hundreds of thousands more. I'm going to try to spread our message through radio, newspapers, "v -- every means 1 can -- to contact as many Americans as possible by the end of the year. My plan is to alert up to one million Americans. ..

I've already sent materials to the printer. I'm prepared for a 50-state offensive. You and I! must move fast if we're going to be ready to flood Capitol Hill with protest petitions on January 5. That's why I need vour contribution of $16-, $15- or 12- risht away. Your contribution will help pay for the phone banks, printing, postage and countless other costs of alerting 167,000 Americans in a few shrt weeks. The danger you and I face is even greater than when Jimmy Carter sat in the White House. With Bill Clinton as our new President, I can only see victory after victory for Big Labor...... Unless, with your helD. I can mobilize all the Committee's 1.7 mil-lion members -- and hundreds of thousands of additional Americans who aqree with us, but who aren't yet part of our coalition. I need your signed petitions to the new Senate and President .. -- - of $16-, $15- 12- -- ij_. and your contribution or today- ....-...... - The war to defend Right to Work begins now. You and I must mobilize immediately. Please respond today. Sincerely,

P.S. Now that Bill Clinton has been elected President, nothing stops Congress from enacting the union elite's forced- unionism agenda . . . nothing except you. First they'll push Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill, which would gut all state Right to Work laws, and give union "organizers" the power to blackmail businesses into forcing their employees to pay union dues. If the union lobbyists win that one, they'll try to destroy -all state Right to Work laws by repealing Taft-Hartley Section 14(b). I need your signed petitions to deliver to the Senate and the President-elect.

And - must have your contribution of $16-, $15- ox 12- TODAY so I can launch a nationwide mobilization to stop Congress from selling America OUL to Big Labor. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxXXXXxxxxxxxxxxxxx XxXxxxXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX: I need your immediate help in stopping Bill Clinton and a union-label Congress from quickly enacting Big Labor's legislative blitzkrieg when congress convenes -- just weeks from now. With Bill Clinton's election and Big babel: picking up strength in the U.S. Senate, you and I ww face our tou9hest battle in 16 veg r# tO r)reserve ou r ~icrht- to WQ&.

Will you sign the enclosed petitions to Pseeident-elect Clinton and to the United State8 Senate?

And will you help with a contribution as well? With Bill Clinton and the new Congress about to take office in January, you and I must move fast. Big LabOr'B game plan for the new Congress is very clear -- and very alarming: Tarqet Number 1 -- The Ted Kennedy Pus& utton Strike bill. Big Labor's Strike bill would give union czars the power to punish ox fire workers who refuse to go on strike. If passed, the Ted Kennedy-Howard Metzenbaum Strike bill would empower union militanix to call any strike they wish and win every strike they call -- as easy as pushing a button. Last year, you stopped the Strike bill in the Senate -- by a margin of only 3 votes.

Tarqet. Numbe r 2 -- Hatch Act Repeal. Destroying the federal Hatch Act; would conscript; 2.9 million federal workers into the union political machine. And it would expose countless private citizens to political harassmerit from federal bureaucracs who are also union officials. This scheme came within 2 votes of becoming law in 2990. NOW Big Labor has even more votes in the Senate. We niay be able to turn it around, but it won't be easy. araet Nu&e r3 -- The Federal Force? Dues bill. Introduced by Rep. Patsy Mink (D-Hawaii) last session, the Federal Forced Due8 bill would empower government union chiefs to coerce all federal employees to pay union dues -- or lose their jobs . Of cliursel that rneane 2.9 million federal employees will owe their jobs to Big Labor -- net: to the taxpayers. Imagine what'll happen to your taxes when the federal governnrent is taking orders from the union braas -- not you or your elected representatives. What will veterans, retirees and others do when federal agenciea, VA hospitals, arid other vital semicttbt are ehut duwri by bitter strikes? (Of course, strikes will be illegal -- but that's never stopped the union brass before!) The trill.ion -dollar federal qovernment will become Bi;g Labor's moprtv -- available to bu ild and exDand the uniw bosses' coercive empire. Then the union high command, their appetite for power whetted, would go for the big prize . . . Targetealof Taft -Hartlev Sect ion 14 (b). Taft-Hartley 14(b) enables states to enact Right to work laws. Destro_vin_s Section 14(b) would, in one blow. 21 state Ricrht to Work laws. By wiping out Section 14(b), Big Labor's ambition is tu lock down every Right to Work state as uriiori-boas territory, Loady for union "organizers" to invade and conquer. And Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CLO he'll sign repeal of Taft-Hartley Section 14(b) as soon as it reaches his desk. In the past, you and I fought heavy odds just to hold back these job-killing, economy-wrecking, coercive bills -- but we did hold them bac.k . Now we again face a desperate fight. The new Congress will be ready and eager to give Big Labor everything it wants. $omehow. VQU 8 :id I must atov th~. That's where our National Mobilization Plan will play such a critical role. Here's the game plan:

1) You and P must slow the union lobbyists dowri in Coriyrevs. Even though our side is heavily outgunned in Congress, there

'...~~ are still ways to delay and stall legislation. i :. ..~ , 8 ._ -1 must up tiitI!$ ... . We gum the machinery at every stage, Lo buv LO '7 jrlert the ...... ~... Dublie. ...I! 2) Next, you and I must mobilize the 75% of Americans who support Right to work. Survey after survey shows you and I have a solid majority behind us. But unless they are warned about the union eliee's plans, and given the tools to fight back, Big Labor will steamroll its power grabs into law.

3) Then we focus public opposition 011 Capitol Hill. 3E you and I turn the heat up high enough, we can turn the votes we need and stop Big Labor'e agenda. Every politician has a melting point -- they can only withstand so nmch pressure fron Lheir conetiluents . . . . And it's our job (yours and mine) to turn up the heat to reach that melting point. You and I and the vast body of Americans who agree with us must keep pouring on the pressure until Congraas has no choice but to listen to the peuple who gay their salaries.

--*:. --*:. r w -- with vau andPaetitioiis -vou hs 1c in vou r hand@. I need your signed petitions tQ the U.S. Senate to turn the heat all the way up -- arid nuke the Serlate Bee the liyht., The politiciaas need to be reminded that Right to Work members are watching their every move -- and will be outraged It' they hand Big Labor the power grabs it wants. Your signed petition to President-ebect Clinton is a1.s~very important. AS Governor oi: Arkansas, Mr. Clinton never dared attack hi6 state's Right to Work law. It was too popular, and the prosperity it fostered was just too important to the workers, families and am11 business owners of Arkansas. That's why, if you and I do our job, we can convince President-elect Clinton of &he foolishness of picking a fight with 758- of the hericaii people. . .. . Wheil Bill Clititoii heat-8 from hundreds Of thouaaIldS of ULV- piqht to Work Americans, he may not be quite so eager to oxweiiQ his pplitical cagita1 carryin? water for Biq Labor. So please sign and return the petitions to the Senat@ and President-elect Bill Clinton today.

I also need to mobilize hundreds of thousands of additional

Americana. I can't do that unt-2 I wvou13 liriaricial suu,uo~+~. Before Election Pay, I committed every resource I had to try to avert Big Labor's election steal. The Committee mailed nearly 2 million candidate information packet8 to Right to Work supporters iii all 50 states to enlist their help in turning around their candidates. Organized Labor made big gains in the W.S. Senate, but our efforts helped avert an even worse disaster. Even though we're outnumbered in the Senate, we still within striking distance of turning around enough votes to stall and even atop forced- unionism legislation. But the result is that Committee bank accounts are virtually empty -- with hundreds of thousands of dollars in bills to pay1 With your contribution, I will be able to begin warning hundreds of thousands of Americans, who members of the National Right to Work Committee, about the threat. You and 1 must mobilize more citizens to join forces with us. We must eurn on the heat, raise our voices to a deafening roar, and put all the pressure we can on Washington. It's the only way you and I can stop Congress fsom obeying the union lobbyists. After all, moat Americans aq ree with up. But I don't think they realize how dangerous the situation is. By telephone, by mail, by every means we can, you and I must enlist the pro-Right to Work majority in OUI cause. Otherwise we'll lose. And the union bosaes will win. I'm preparing to call approximately 167,000 Americans before Congress convenes. And I' 11 write hundreds of thousaiidv nwre. I'm going to try to spread our message through .radio, nswspapsrs, TV -- evary means I can -- to contact as many Americans as possible by tne end of the year. My plan is to alert up to one million Americans. I've already sent materials Lo the printer. I'm prepared €02 a SO-sLate offensiv@.

You and 1 nust niave fast if we're going to be ready to'flood Capitol Hill with protest petitions on January 5.

That'B why 1: need QOUT contribution af $3NPC. SZHPC o r SHPC: aright: away. Your contribution will help pay for the phone banks, printing, postage and countless other costs of alerting 167,000 Americans in a few short weeks. The danger you and 1 face is even greater than when Jimmy Carter sat In the White House. With Bill Clinton as our new Presidelit, I can only aee victory after victory Cor Big Labor. . .

. . .Unless. with vow r helD. I can mill ZP all the Committee's 1.7 millinn members -- and hund-0 Q f thousands of sdditional Americw s wh u mree with us, &t who aren't vee D art of our coalition. 5 need your signed petitions to the new Senate and President -- your contribution of $3HPC, SZHPC or SHPC -- !&&&g. The war to defend Right to Work begins now. You and I must mobilize immediately. Please respond today. Sincerely,

Reed Larson

P.S. Now that Bill Cliritorl has been elected President, nothing stops Congress from enactinig the union elite's forced- uriioxiism agenda . . . nothing except you. First they'll push Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill, which would gut all state Right to Work laws, and give union llorganizerslBthe power to blackmail businesees into fOrChy their employees to pay union dues, If the union lobbyists win that one, they'll try to destroy state Right to Work laws by repealing Taft-Hartley Section 14 (b). I need your signed petitions to deliver to the Senate and the President-elect.

And I must have your contribution of $SHPC, $2HPC or $HPC TODAY SO I can launch a nationwide mobiliakiLiorl LO $Lop

~ ~~ I. I I I \sc\c1a- I ddFZ?\ A COALITION OF EMPCOYEES AND EMPLOYERS

REED LARSON. Prmdenl XXXX XX, 1992

xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx Dear XXXXXXXXXX: Thank you for contacting me about the phone call you received from the National Right to Work Committee Telecommunications Department. As you know, the National Right to Work Committee is dedicated to fighting compulsory unionism at every level. The union mongols have a $9,000,000-a-dayarmy of "organizers" and propagandists ready to storm Capj.to1 Hill or take to the streets to enhance Organized Labor's power. But your National Right to Work Committee depends on scores of thousands of concerned citizens like you -- people who are willing to contact public officials at both the national and state levels. Most of the time, I rely on Actiongrams and other special member mailings to alert you to Big Labor's grabs for power and money -- and what you and I must do to stop them. But occasionally I don't have time to send a letter. On those occasions, I must mobilize thousands of Committee members at. a moment's notice to counter the union hierarchy's forced-dues political clout. I'm sure you see the value this tool can have in our fight against compulsory unionism. For example, a flood of last-minute phone calls from Committee members killed the renomination of union-boss lackey Mary Cracraft to the National Labor Relations Board just last December. Cracraft was an apparent shoo-in until that €ha1 hour -- even after the flood of letters, postcards and petitions fr.om

WASHINGTON D.C. HEADOUARTERS: ROO1 BRADDOCK ROAD. SUITE 500 SPRINGFIELD, VIRGINIA 22160 o TEL (703)321-9820 "Americans nws! haw IhP t,.gt)r I)!,! wf lx ~'ntw~oli~rifo ~orr! Inhor LI~OIIS'' '. ..

thousands of Right to Work supporters inundated the White House. On very short notice in early 1991, I was able to contact 5,700 pro-Right to Work Iowans. They, in turn, made over 3,700 phone calls in 72 hours, convincing Governor Terry Branstad to reverse his position and veto a bill designed to let union officials take over Iowa's public schools. As you can see, phone calls by our menbers can make the difference between victory and defeat for the Right to Work. That's why I'd like to be able to contact you by Ehone when it becomes necessary to turn the heat the way up on the politicians. ... I do understand that some members prefer not to be . .. Li ... . contacted by phone. If you wish, I can code our files so yc.~ f:! will no longer receive phone calls -- or receive only action- oriented calls. Just send back the enclosed reply form with your preference marked. However, I hope you'll allow me to continue to contact you by phone so you'll be kept up to date on the latest events affecting Right to Work -- and to let you know when direct and i.mmediate action is needed. Again, thank you so much for contacting me with your concerns. Please don't hesitate to write if I can be of any assistance.

Reed Larson \

P.S. Please mark your preference on the enclosed reply form so we can comply with your wishes. Because the union czars have a $9 million-a-day political battalion they can instantly deploy to enhance Big Labor power, 1 sometimes need to rely on phone calls to mobilize Committee members. But if you like, I can make sure you receive fewer calls, or no calls at all -- whatever you prefer. Just use the enclosed form to let me know. TO : Reed Larson National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite 500 Springfield, VA 22160

FROM: xxxxxxwu[xxx xxxx xx xx x x x x XXXXxxxXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX xxxxx xxxxxxxx Please indicate your preference:

I'd like to continue to be contacted by phone when necessary to keep me up to date on the activities of the National Right to Work Comnittee and know when my immediate action and financial support are needed. Please call me when my immediate action is needed. I prefer not to be called about membership renewal or to be asked for a contribution. Please code the Committee's files so I will no longer be contacted by telephone.

Sincerely,

(signature) NO POSTAGE NECESSARY IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES I FIRST CLASS MAIL 2873 SPRINGFIELD. VA I PERMIT NO. WSTAQE WILL BE PAID BY ADDRESSEE

REED LARSON NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK COMMITTEE 8001 BRADDOCK ROAD SPRINGFIELD, VA 22151-9986 ...~. ::.- ! .....~. . i :J ---,..I . . .. I ! ..?<-! .i : , '. .'< .! i , I .. ...~ ...... p-j

.,. ,

'!.. Whucos: Big Labor is erptciing Congress IO ratify ~IScompulsory unionism agenda, including Le Tcd Keaxdy- Howard Meoenbaum Strike bill. the Hash ACI Repeal bill and Le Fcdcral Forced Dues bill. and Whereas: Congressional leadership. already beholden IO Big Labor, is now even more liely 10 give Ihe unim high command whaavcr it wants. and Whereas: Caving in lo he union special inmess would tankmpt small businesses. hike mes. scnd inflation sky- ward, cripplc Amcrican compctitivcnms. and send good jobs overseas, and Wherw: Sevenly-five percent ofall Americans supprt LeRighi w Work - and oppose giving mon cmrcive power 10 union officials. THEREFORE: As your consiilucnt. I urge you 10 hced the vas1 majority of Americans who oppow: compulmry unionism by fighting lhc forced-unionism power grabs rhai union lobbyism will be intmducing in Lissssion of

Mr. Wonderful Sample Chocolate City

Not

Senator Robert C. Bysd

Whereas: Big Labar is cxpcciing Congress 10 ratify is compulsory unionism agenda, including Le Ted Kennedy- lloward hlcocnbaum Strike bill, lhc Hatch ACI Rcpcal bill and heFederal Forced Dues bill. and Whereas: Congrcssional Icadcrship. alrcatly beholdcn u) Big Labor. is now wen more likely 10 give Le union high command whatever ii wants. and Whcra: Caving in IO the union special intcrcsu would banklupl small biainesscs. hike lanes, send inflation sky- ward. cripplc American compsutivcncsr. and send good jobs ovews. and Wherw: Scvciily-fivcpercenl ofa11 Amcricans supporl Ihc Right ID Work - and oppose giving more coercive pwer to union officials. TflEREFORE: As your conslilucnl. I urge you lo heed the vas1 majority ofAmericans who oppose compul.wry unionism by fighung Ihc forced-unionism power grabs hat union lobbyism will bc invoducing in this session of

City Mr. Wonderful Sample Chocolate City

Mifizenr qefifim fo Senator John D. Rockefeller, IV

Whcrcas: ihg 1.3hl)r IS cipccling Congress IO raily ILS compulwry amionism agenda. including Lc Ted Kennedy- llowud .\lrvcnl13urn Smke bill. the Ihtch Act Re@ bill and rhc Fcdcral Forced Dues bill. and Whcreax Congressional lmdcrship. dready bchuldcn ID Big Labor. is now Even more lihcly lo give che union high command uhaaw il wanis. and Whercas: Caving in IO he union spxial inieresu would hnktupi small businesses. hikc mes. send innalion sky- ward. cripple American conipctiuvencss. and scnd good pbs otcrscas. and Whercay: Scwnl).fivr percent of all Amcricans suppnn the Right IO Work -aid oppose giving more coerciw p*rr Io union olfichls. ‘REREFORE: As bout consliluenl. I urge )uu IO hcul llie \3slmajCniy of Amencans whoopp%compalwry unionism h) fighung !he lorccd.unionirm purr grshiIh31 union lobbjisls will be inuaducing in his ses,ionol COngrC%S. Signa~urc city Slate __ Mr. Wonderful Sample Chocolate CiIy wv i

The National EWht to Work Committee's Washineton D.C. Headauarters 1s located at our nation's cmital at 800 1 Braddock Road. Suite 500 * SordnEfleld. VA 22 160 0 TeleDhone 18001 325-7892. ]Becau e . rnits unlimited Iobbvtng. contributions qre not tax dcductible as charitable contributfons.

~~~ --~~- - BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION CQMMISSIQN

-.. ..x ..x In the Marter of ) .... . F?- Witness Subpoena to ) MUR 3774 1 The National Right to) .. . [:: .. Work Committee ) /I , i Li

DOCUMENTS FROM N,PTWC

EPA ENT 21 VOLUME 38. NUMBER 11 November 1992

9 i~ . RiFht to \\orL. nicmhers thumaned Big ..Lahrir'\ dri\r. to enact Sens. Ted .Kcnncd! tI)-51.1,, I a~~dfhvard Metzen- hauni'z tlI-Ohiol Pu5hhutton Strike hill .(S.5SIH.K. 51III thc rraning days of fhe :. .IOMCongro,. The, ~es\i<~iiadjourned in October ~.'nithow cnxtin; the jeh-dcmoying legis-

: i Committee I'rehident Reed Larson praised Comniittcc nien1berS "whose sac- rifice and dedication made this victory possihle." In recogni7,iiig Right to Work mem- bers' couragtouz fight to stop the Push- button Strike bill. Larson hoped to both "emphasize ho\v significant their success is" and "inspirt them for the battles yet ahead."

Right to Work Members Riglir to Work mivnhcm .stopped rhr $I2 billion union-boss tnuchine's drive 10 emcf ihe Stalled Strike Bill Pushburton Strike hill in !he S~~nrrr~. In U.S. Senate fhe Right to Work filibusier. attempt and only 3 on their second. Committee mcmher5' ?(!-month strug- Unable to overcome the ground swell "The battle is not over yet." snarled gle agdinhf rhe SlriAe hill reached a cli. of public oppohition. Mitchell tailed nar- Metzenbaum after Mitchell's second max in thc U.S. Senate in June. rowly both times. offensive fell short. At !ha! lime. Senate Majority Leader Union lobbyists came within 5 votes Several weeks later. Metzenbaum George Mitchell (D-Maine) truckled to of gagging resistance 10 the Kennedy- threatened to insert the Strike legislation his union-bo\\ financiers and thrust the Metzenbaum Strike bill on their first See Courage page 2 Pushbutton Sfrike bill to the Senate floor for a vote. Backed by National Right to Work Committee members. Sen. (R-Utah), Sen. Steve Symms (R-Idaho) Senate Sandbags Beck Ruling Stealing a BIece for ehe Rock and other pro-worker freedom senators Pro-Big Labor nmjori? ofsctimors Nl3union elite and Prudetirial rip off led an extended debate - or filibuster - wfefor fimed-dues poliiii,.s ...... 2 teachers, iaapayers ...... 4 to block the cenain passage of the hill. (The Sfrike hill had already been rub- ber-stamped by the L'.S. House in June 1991.) hlitchcll Iricd I\\I~.c10 yu;i\h dehste and force passage nl the Puhhhutton Strike bill hy attemptin! III in\ohc cloture and kill ~

or even dismissal from their jobs. And union “organizers“ would wield their massive new powers in every state ‘The seal ~WQWin to destroy busines\e\ and jobs. jack up into a giant appropriations bill in order to the cost of iiving. wring taxpayers dry. ram his power grab through just before the U.S. Congress adjourned. and force even more workers to pay However. the Committee’s federal union dues. legislative staff again sounded the alarm. In the face of member protests. Met- Recognizing Members’ Sacpifices zenbaum backed down. embers who never InaporQarnd for Future Fight Committee Will Lead gave up, never gave “The rea1 heroes in the fight against Fight Again in 1993 the Strike bill were thousands of Com- in, and never lost mittee members who never gave up, Big Labor strategists are dready plan- never gave in, and never lost faith.” said ning their drive ro enact the Strike bill in faith. Committee President Larson. 1993. ‘*Somemembers contributed financial- Union lobbyists expect the new Reed Larson, ly to support this fighi. Congress to be even more dominated by National Right to Work “Others canvassed their family mem- union-label pals than the last Congress Committee President ber.5, neighbors and coworkers to collect was. petitions to Congress against the Strike So the National Right to Work Com- bill.” marvelled Larson. mittee will need to collect and deliver “I hope the victory we won in 1992 even more than the 475,000 petitions - and thereby gain the leverage to force will be a reminder to every member who delivered in 1991 and 1992. more workers under union-machine con- took part that we can overcome the power trol. and money of Big L.abor when we fight Strike Bill Would Undermine The Strike bill would blow a giant together.“ he continued. State Right to Work Laws hole in the nation’s 21 state Right to “What’s more, Right to Work mem- Work laws by gutting protections for bers will face an even fiercer fight in Under the guise of banning so-called employees who refuse to obey the union 1993,” warned Larson. “permanent replacement workers.” the czars’ whims. “Right to Work members know the Pushbutton Strike bill would hand union Under this restrictive legislation. union bosses won’t give up either. so I bosses the power to force employees out workers would have to obey union-boss hope they’ll be inspired by their victory on strike - as easy as pushing a button strike orders or risk pay cuts, demotions, to fight on.” he concluded.

Big Labor allies in the US. Senate put on the use of union dues for politics. etly squirreled away an mendmerit in the their mouths where their money is, voting The regulations Big Labor tried to kill Labor Appropriations bill (H.R. 5671) to in September to keep compulsory union- would require union officials to furnish eliminate funding for enfmement by the dues sewer money flowing into their feder- the Department of Labor with detailed Department of Labor of the Supreme al campaigns by blocking implementation records of their political and other non- Court’s Beck decision. of the Supreme Court’s 1988 Beck ruling. collective bargaining expenses. Had the Committee not spotted this Only an on-the-spot filibuster. quickly Based upon this information. workers anti-worker proposal and sounded the organized by the National Right to Work could demand a reduction in union dues alarm, it could have slipped rhrough Committee. blocked Organized Labor‘s equal to the amount spent by union offi- Congress and become law. sneak attempt to vacate the Beck ruling. cials on all nonbargaining activities. But Karl Gallant. the Committee’s vice president for federal legislation. In the Beck decision. the Supreme Despite majority support for the Beck sported the Beck repeal and alerted Sen. Court ruled that federal labor law does repeal, Big Labor fell four votes short of Phil Gramm (R-Texas). Cramm helped the votes needed to shut down the fili- not allow union bosses to compel work- 60 block the union bosses’ back-room power buster led by pro-Right to Work senators. ers to pay union dues for politics and grab by immediately launching a fili- other noncollective bargaining expendi- buster. When the union-label majority tures by union officials. Committee Exposes ‘Sneak’ could not overcome the Right to Work- A 56 to 38 majority of the Senate Anti-Worker Proposal backed filibuster. they removed the anti- backed the Labor Appropriations bill that worker amendment from the appropria-.. . would have defunded Labor Department On September 9. Sens. tions bill. enforcement of the Supreme Court‘s ban (D-Iowa) and Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) qui- See Beck next page 2 candidates for federal office. intense pressure from Right to Work But this reponed PAC money repre- members earlier this ye%.

~ .. :.. i ~~,,,r,,,,,~.,l.l,,,,,,,W<, : sents only a fraction of Big Labor's President Bush finally heeded three ~.., immense political empire. and a half years of member protests in ' ~'Union Bosses Have Experts estimate that the illegal. or April when he moved to implement the 'Bought' Senate "soft." money spent by union power bro- Supreme Court's ban 011 misuse of union kers - on phone banks. get-out-the-vote dues for politics. Kationcll Right to Work Committee drives and pa.id. full-time "volunteers" - The Senate's effort to block enforce- President Reed Larwn >aid he was relieved is up to ten times greater than reported ment of the regulations and thwart the hat the Bcd dcci3inn has mnived for now contributions. law simply proves that the lopsided Big hut alarmed that \(I many senators voted to Labor majority in both houses of "force American workers to fuel the Worker fights Attacked Congress was installed there with illegal pipeline oi unicin-due\ sewer money flow- By Union Bosses forced-dues cash. ing into federd cainpsignr." Politicians who survive on a steady "We won chi, one." Lsrson said. "But The Bush Administration's (still flow of forced-dues campaign cash will not the fact that a whhtantial majority of the incomplete) regulations that came under tolerate even a modest effort to restrict Bi,g Senare voted to kill this Supreme Coun fire in the U.S. Senate were a product of Labor's illegal political activities. ruling and force American workers to fund senatorr' reelection campaigns proves this Iegirlatise hody has uuly been bought and paid tor hy union officials." I It proves a\ uell that the union-boss agenda cannot stand the light of day. "Rather than face public scrutiny - and Right to Work member opposition - the union lobhyisk tried to slide their anti-worker proposals into law by bury- ing them in the middle of an enormous appropriations hill." Larson added. Senators' Union-Dues Gravy Thin

A recent Wci'clsliingfoiiPosr report, based on Federal Election Commission (FEC) data. showed the 70 largest Big Labor PAC3 ;ilonc \pent imirc than 516 niilliun through the wcond quaner of thih election year to huy elections tbr their handpicked The top brass of the 1.1 million-strong Forced-Unionism Statutes NEA unions, and corrals teachers undcr National Educational Association (NEA) Build NEA Bower Base union control. teacher union is sucking tax dollars and UniServ is a shadowy army of over power from citizens adparents across the Coercive laws in 34 states put the 1,500 well-paid union professionals nation and is very close to locking down NEA union elite in the position to control which the NEA high command has monopoly control over America’s schools. curriculum and job requirements - as deployed in every area of the coimtry. As rulers of what is already the nation‘s well as. in many cues, the power to force Thanks to UniServ’s ruthless efficiency. largest union, the NEA hierarchy hinders the firing of teachers and other school the NEA is well on the way to winning the learning, siphons off tax revenues into fat employees who refuse IO pay union dues. battle to conaol America’s schools. bureaucracies, saddles American teachers This forced-dues control enables NEA Yet most Americans have never even with indusmal-style work rules. and fosters union bosses to funnel tax dollars into heard of the NEA teacher union’s UniServ. ;-‘I a “hate-the-school-board”mentality. building their political machine and away UniServ commandos are trained in ....~ .. . takeover tactics developed by the late ..;.: As a result, American students are from schoolchildren who should benefit militant socialist Saul Alinsky and others. :_i denied the preparation they need to com- from ever-increasing “education” taxes...... pete in today’s global economy. ’That’s why, even as per pupil expendi- The NEA union’s hibliography of il The increasingly radicalized teacher tures have skyrocketed during the past training materials .include$ Alinsky‘s union autocracy is well on the way decade, student test scores in NEA-con- Johti L. Lewis (an admiring account of ..~~ toward its god of becoming the only trolled schools have stagnated at low lev- the exlortionate exploits of the infanlous -.. .. door to the teaching profession. els. or dropped. Mine Workers’ union chieftain) and .~...... “When we negotiate. we’re not intsrest- Rules for Radirrils. long duhbed the :-i At the 1970 NEA Convention, George Fischer. ex-NEA president, looked forward ed in saving them (the taxpayers1 money. “bible” of radical politics. ~. to the day when the union would realize its “We’re interested in getting for our- UniServ operatives draw an average. - .. .. “dream of controlling who enters. who selves,“ admitted an ex-union boss from annual salary of 1672.000. more than twice .. ~ stays. and %holeaws the profession.“ West Carrollton. Ohio in a rare moment the wages of the average teacher (whose of candor. -. The NEA union hiernrchy‘s drive to forced dues pay UniSrrv agents‘ way). .. . control teacher certification is increasing- .~: ...... ~.. ly successful. NEA’s UniServ Is Teacher Union Bosses With a monopoly on teachers in many Forced Unionism’s Target School Boards parts of the country, NEA union officials Shock Trcpops iue able to call strikes and impose their Primary UniServ goals are more power for the NEA union machine. and demands time after time. Unseen and unknown IO most Ameri- Children, parents. taxpayers and many cans. an elite corps of NEA union field more compulsory dues flowing into dedicated teachers are held hostage by operatives known as UniServ infiltrates union coffers. the NE4 teacher union canel. and manipulates school systems and local set, UniSerr new pup

A Ye NEA/UniServ militants and the they’ve had for 38 years. NEA’s Fairfax County, Virginia sub- Hundreds of school employees will sidiary have manipulated the county’s have to leave trusted dwtors and hospi- school board into handing Prudential tals for unfamiliar ones. most of whom Insurance Company a teacher health practice out of state. insurance contract that is $4.5 million more expensive than the bid offered by Committee Expases the county’s previous insurer. NEA Bras’s Motive Meanwhile. NEA officials received $8.6 million in 1988 and $9.9 million in The National Right to Work Com- 1989, a 30 percent CUI of the premiums, mittee has exposed the sweetheart to “administer” teachers’ life insurance health insurance deal with Prudential as policies for Prudential. part of a plot Io bilk taspayers and Since then. evidence suggests Pruden- teachers across the country out of mil- tial and the NEA have concealed the life lions and millions ofdollars. insurance kickbacks to avoid suspicion. In October the Committee mailed Teachers are outraged because Pru- Right to Work advocates throughout NEA teacher union bosses get a hefry dential’s health plan restricts their Fairfax County a letter revealing the “piece of riie rock” when teachers pay choice of doctors and hospitals and is insitrunce premiums to Pmdentiul. generally inferior to the coverage See Bid-Rigging tie.rt puge

4 I by the NEA union czars through seized school boards not only pick teachers‘ pockets. but also soak taxpayers. In the 1989-90 school year, the aver- age per pupil expenditure in the 2 I states permitting such contracts was $5.683. That’s $1,534 higher than states without forced dues for teachers. Yet SAT and other student achieve- ment scores routinely drop whenet’er MEA union bosses lock down control through teacher monopoly bargaining and “agency shops.” RTEA’s U&ew Coerces Educators and Citizens Using Violence and Division

UniServ also promotes the use of vio- lent tactics often associated with industri- al trade union bosses. Top NEA union officials directly pro- mote. incite and coordinate Teamster- style harassment of school board rnem- bers and teachers. Taking a page from the UniServ play- book, an lndiana State Teachers Associa- tion regional coordinator. Richard Corn- stubble. was arrested outside a school .. board member‘s house holding a bag of j union-boss slate to take over the city’s paint and varnish remover over the school board. which had resolutely opposed school board member’s car. the NEA‘s compulsoly-unionism demands. In Comstubble’s car. polics found a can Union mogul Felice Strauss later of spray paint. a piece of concrete. a sledge NEA union hosses are especially boasted. ”It Wasn‘t until changed the hammer. and a city map marked with X’s effecti,e in u5ing ,heir L,~~s~~~,political WP composition of the school board . . . that indicating the homes of three school board ,” u,re,( control c,f local school members who were not sufficiently com- we were able to bargain for , . . organiza- boards from parent\ and taxpayers. pliant to NEA union-boss demands. In 1988. NtA-affiliated union kinmins tional security 1i.e.. forced-union dues.]” in Long Becrch. California handpicked a The compulsoq-dues contracts sought See Incite pugc 6

UniServ Agent hierarchy. Manipdates School Board Coercing school boards to create union boss-dominated committees to The Fairfax County scandal began “advise” school officials is a favorite NEA’s well-orchestrated operation to tactic of the NEA union brass. infiltrate and influence multimillion- when an NEA/UniServ employee and They call it “collaborative” bargain- dollar purchases by a school system for FEA union officials manipulated the a probable cut of the take. school board to create an “employee“ ing - and it’s a way to manipulate school boards even in states. like Vir- The Committee has a150 obtained committee to revamp the school sys- ginia. which have no teacher monopoly documenis showing that the NEA’s tem’s health care coverage. UniServ organizers nationwide are bargaining statutes. After seizing control of that com- In recent weeks, the National Right trained to steer contracts and influence mittee, UniServ agenl Rick Willis and purchasing in behalf of favored vendors. to Work Committee has heard from his FEA cronies cut a $35 million-a- teachers and school board members that Prudential. apparently a major year drai with Prudential to provide favored vendor, also “contributes” to UniServ operatives are hatching similar NEA front groups and maintains other health insurance for Fairfax school health insurance plots elsewhere in Vir- sweetheart business deals with the employees. according to the local ginia and in other states. teacher union behemoth. Reston Times. If you know of NEA union-boss Alerted to the Big Labor rip-off, Com- If the arrangement follows the pat- manipulation of health insurance plans. mittee members are now encouraging tern of !he NEA-Prudential life insor- please write Mark Mix. Committee Vice angq teachers to exercise their Right to ance deal. as much as a third of the President for State Legislation. 8001 Work by rri:.ning from the Fairfiix Edu- teachers‘ premiums. over 510 million-a- Braddock Rd.. Springfield. Va. 22161). cation Awoci;i:iwi I FEhl union year. may be routed bud to the NEA or call (703)321-9820.

5 (-,11/,1,,,1< (1 In1111 pow NEA agent Cornstubble was dresed entirely in black and had remoyed the dome light from his car. “Somebody trained him well.” said the targeted school board member. Union boss-sponsored violence is a product of the “us against them” animosi- ty fostered by union bosses. Jo Seker, retired educator and former director of Concerned Educators Against Forced Llnionism (CEAFU), recalled one of the experiences that inspired her to fight for oppressed teachers. In 1972. a UniServ “director” assigned to her school asked her how many grievances she had filed as head of her local NEA union affiliate. When Seker responded that she did not have to file grievances because rela- tions with the school administration were friendly. the UniServ operative snapped. forced-dues privileges w,hereverthey exist. any other public employee could he ”That’s not good enough. But until every state protects teachers’ forced to accept union-bos\ 7epresenta- “You’re not doing your job.” rights. rhr Committee‘s sister organization, tion.” and then be forced to pry for it to He wamed. ”You have to file at least 30 the National Right to Work Legal Defense boot. grievances a year. or you‘re not doing your Foundation. is striving to minimize the job.” harm of forced unionism by advancing Teachers and Taxpayers worker-freedom cases in the courts. Have an Advocate Even in Right to Work §tats, While over S4 percent of American Union Bosses Coerce Teachers public school teachers live in states where State and local politicians. reluctant to they can be fired if they refuse to pay take on Big Labor or deeply indebted to One way teacher union bosses do a union dues, the U.S. Supreme Court’s it, are resisting mlbrceiiien~(if the safe- “job” on education is by using their con- 1986 Cliica,qo Tearhers Union Y. Annie guards for public school teachers‘ politi- trol of teachers’ liability insurance to Lee HII~SOSDNdecision (won by Foundation cal freedom set bzh in HII~\~III. coerce educators to join the NEA union attorneys) prohibits the “agency fees” The Committee’, tducatim branch. - even in Right to Work states. workers are forced to pay from being Concerned Educators Xg.iinst Forced In the 1980s. Tennessee Gov. Lamar spent on politics. Unionism (CEAFU). ha\ btepped into the Alexander (now U.S. education secre- In Hird.sm~.the High Court unani- fray to assist the couragr.ou\ teachers and tw;: was savaged by the NEA hierarchy mously ruled that the union hierarchy other citizens who oppow [he YEA union when he proposed the state provide class- cannot conscript a single penny from chiefs’ coercive tactic\. room liability insurance for all public public .secror nonunion employees with- “The nation pays n !errible price as school teachers. out establishing that seized money will be long as Big Labor rely, \upreme over The NEA union czars fought against spent entirely on collective bargaining America’s tax-funded puhlrc dxds--- this benefit because they wanted to con- activities. the declining test score\ (11today forecast tinue misleading teachers with claims that If properly enforced. this precedent our nation’s decline in cximperitiveness classroom insurance could be obtained would restrain the NEA union chiefs and vitality of tomorrow.” *aid Commit- only by submitting to Big Labor rule. from converting their army of UniServ tee President Re,-L ‘ drwn.I ’ To preserve their power, the NEA operatives into political organizers who “Industrial-style conipul\ory unionism union bosses fought for and maintained buy elections 21 every level from local is denying millions of our children the their monopoly on this pet recruitment school boards to the White House. proper education they duw\s. premium even though it meant sacrificing Enforcement of Hudson could help cut “But the Committee and CEAFU are the interests of the NEA rank and file and the ranks of the tax-and-spend, anti-busi- fighting back by advancing ieachers‘ con- other teachers. ness, NEA-puppet politicians who now stitutional right not lo hmhroll the union dominate so many state legislatures and political machine.“ exp1ainr.d Lnrson. Teachers Enjoy the US.Congress. Right to Work nisniher%who have Some Protection But f/icd.ssorr is being flouted. observed the NEA forced-unionism ahus- Due to Hudson Precedent Even if enforced. the Hiidson ruling es in their cornmunit!,. cir \rho uould like would offer only partial relief from more information on Conctrned Educa- The National Right to Work Cornmiltee forced unionism. tors Against Forced L‘niwi\m. %hould is striving to pass state Right to Work and The only permanent solution is to contact CEAFU. Monopoly Bargaining Repeal bills which enact state Right to Work laws and repeal Write Cathy .lone, ;it 8001 Braddock would eliminate the NEA teacher union state monopoly representation sratutes. Rd., Suite 500. Sprin~fielil.Va. 22160. or bosses’ exclusive representation and This would ensure that no teacher or call (703)32 1-85IO.

6 er Walter L-. Allen. a farmer and fornier were forced to pay dues under an "agency factory worker who faced down union shop" scheme. violence. u;1\ elected chairman of the In 1967. Marker led a large group of National Right to Work Committee hoard aircraft production workers in suing the of directon in Septemher. Machinists union to prevent union offi- Allen. aho ha3 served on the Commit- cials from using their forced "agency tee's hoard since 198.5. was chosen by the shop" payments for political purposes. hoard's executive ccmmittee to succeed Marker's ground-breaking lawsuit. the late Committee Chairman Gerald known initially as the Sray case, paved Marker. the way for the U.S. Supreme Court's Allcn ail1 %er\cas chairman until the I984 €/lir/F~ihand I988 Beck decisions. full hoard's annual meeting in 199.3. Both the N/is/Fails and Beck deci- sions. won by Naiional Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation attorneys, I Chairman hlarker's barred the misuse of workers' compulso- ..1 Achievements Vital ry "agency fees" for politics. i For Right to Work After many years of fighting coercive unionism on the plant floor and in the ~-.Marker died of cancer August 20 ai courtroom. Marker was elected io the ~- his home in Van Nuys. California. Committee's board of directors in 1973. Walter Allen is taking the helm of the ..-.:.. AS an emplo!ee of the McDonnell- .. He served as chairman from August National Right to Work Commirree as rhr j Douglas aerospuce firm for 23 years. Ger- 1986 until his death. iiew chairman of the board of directors. ... . ald Marker first suffered under compulso- Committee President Red Larson paid --.. . ry unionim in 19.51. when he Was forced tribute to Marker at his memorial service. With the help of attorneys provided by : ~!to join the Electrical Workers union. Speaking for "the hundreds of thou- the National Right to Work Legal ' In 1963. Marker helped to lead .. sands of Right to Work members for Defense Foundation, Mr. Allen posted j.. i employec prote\t\ and lawsuits opposing .. whom Gerry's leadership has meant SO local and appellate court triumphs over ..z~ i the compulmry-union shop contracts much." Larson said that Marker's "quiet the malicious campaign of coercion and which Presidcnt John Kennedy personal- couraze and resolute dedication to princi- retribution conducted by IAM officiis. ly attempted ((1 lbrce upon thousands of ple have inspired us all. But a politically motivated Ohio aerospace employees across the nation. "The Right to Work movement and the Supreme Coun stole the 172,000 award- S'hilc he succeeded in defeating the cause of libeny have been strengthened as ed Mr. Allen and his coworkers and indi- den?and for compulsory-union member- a result of Geq's geai accomplishments cated they were liable to pay a "strike ship. Marker and his fellow employees and leadership." Larson added. fine" to IAM union officials. In a dissenting opinion, Justice Roben New Chairman E. Holmes said IAM union officials "were A Veteran of the Fight directly responsible" for "the numerous For Worker Freedom tire slashing?,. window smashings and other incidents of property damage." In 1971, union officials told Walter Foundation attorney Glenn Tauhman Allen he must join the International called the proceeding "an outrageous Association of Machinists (IAM) union example of judicial thievery." to keep his job at the F. E. Myers Pump Instead of being demoralized by this Company in Ashland. Ohio. bitter setback. Chairman Allen hzs inten- When Mr. Allen defied a strike order sified his commitment to the struggle during a 1980 strike. he and his cowork- against forced unionism. ers endured vicious verbal attacks and Allen paid tribute to his predecessor as public threats from IAM union officials. chairman, calling Marker "a warrior for Union thugs swerved cars onto the side- freedom, who was tried but never found walks to terrorize the workers. threatened wanting. to assault them with large metal objects, "Following in Gerry's footsteps won't and harassed them for weeks as they per- be easy," continued Allen. "hut with the formed safety-sensitive tasks at work. help of the Committee's 1.7 million Gerald Morkrr's "quiet courage and res- Union ruffians also dumped nails on members. we'll keep fighting Big Labor olute drdicarion ro principle" inspired the workers' driveways and posted tyranny until freedom is restored for Right to Work .rupporter.c. "scab" signs in their yards. every American worker." The Federal Election Comniibsion (FEC) is crafting new federal regulations in its vendetta to hamsiring the National Right to Work Committee. Big Labor's errand boys at the FEC have been backed into a comer by recent federal coun dings limiting their power to harass independent citizen groups like the National Right to Work Committee. But in their latest attempt at regulatory double-dealing, the FEC has proposed a set of "revised speech codes that could. in practice, put an airtight gag on the First Amendment rights of the Commit- tee and other citizen groups. while leav- ing Big Labor's massive illegal forced- dues political machine untouched. FEC Slams Right to Work, Ignores Big Labor's Forced-Dues Campaigning Labor politicians to panhandle for money .siriojt to the Mondale campaign. The Supreme Court has repeatedly at forced dues-funded union conventions. Then the FEC bureaucrats attacked the confirmed that an organization - provid- "In Iawwit after lawsuit. the federal Coinmittee for illegally /ie/pIti,q the Mon- ed it does not use its issues mail to courts have repeatedly negated the EC's dale campaign. "expressly advocate" the election or wide-ransing. 16-year vendetta against Eight years later. the FEC is still defeat of a politician - is protected from free speech." \aid National Right to Work deinanding a S 100.000 fine from the FEC censorship under the First Amend- Committee Preiident Reed Lanon. Committee. as well a> il court order inent of the US.Constitution. "But each time the taxpayer-financed directing the Comniittce iir\er to investi- But the new FEC guidelines - sup- union power hrokers at the FEC weak in gate Big Labor's illegal politicking posedly in compliance with these rulings behind the coun's rulings and bureaucrat- hchemrs again. - would mfully authorize bureaucrats to ically do everything they can to thwart control nearly every activity of these con- the ccxn's reaffirmation of our constitu- FEC Bends Under Pressure stitutionally protected groups. tional rights of free hpeech." From Right to Work Supporters In testimony to the FEC delivered October I-!. Karl Gallant. Committee vice Bureaucrats Still Smarting The Committee ha\ uaged a two- president for federal legislation, told the From Right to Work Probe pronged counteroffensive during the last Commissioners IO make major changes in five years. the proposed regulations. Gallant charged This is only the late\t attempt by FEC Through nationu ide peiitinn drives and that as a result of the FEC's assault on operatives to carry water for union bosses. other efforts. the C~iiniiii!cc.ehas brought the First Amendment. "hardworking citi- In 19x4. the National Right to Work pressure on Congrrs. IO iiit df funding zens . , , are losing their fundamental Committee - conipelkd to act by the for the FEC and pu,hed Icdcral bureau- right to petition the government." FEC's indillerence to Big Liibor's illegal crats to conform their rezulations and The National Right to Work Commit- politicking - announced. at a nationally activities to U.S. Supreme Court rulings. tee. for instance. could possibly run afoul reponed pres, wnference. it would invrs- The FEC itself ;Ichno\*IecIpedthe Com- of the FEC's new regulations simply by tigate Walter Slundals'h presidential mittee'.; effom. Writing in the July 1992 mentioning the name of a political candi- campaign tu probe it was illegally accept- Feilerrr[ Registrr. the FEC complained date in its correspondence with its own ing under-[he-tahle union-boss support. that it had heen deluged trirh more than members. The Comniiitee reported its findings to 17.(W letters from C&niiiittcc members. But. ahese same regulations would the FEC. In one caw. the Slondale cani- "The vabt majority ut the commenters expand Big Labor's massive. illegal paign wah lurced ((I pay back more than bubmitted virtually identical letters urg- "soft" money spending. S398.OUO in illegal campaign contrihu- ing the Commi\non to act ta\orably on Existing abuses of compulsory union tions. hut the FEC took !to action to pun- NR(T1WC'i rulc-rn;ihing petition." the dues for politics - in-kind spending on ish the union hw\e> [or breaking the law. FEC reported. phone hanks. get-out-the-vote drives and Instead. tiutraged union officials To keep the heat OII. the Committee mail explicitly backing a candidate - charged thc i't)tntiitttee with illegal cam- will won be rcne\\ing it\ iiatiotiitde would continue to be sanctioned under paign acti\iti<\. The union bosses petition drive. a4,ing Coii>iiiirtee mem- the FEC's new guidelines. in defiance of claimed that the Conimittee. *how inves- her5 to den theii clccted s>llicialsto the the Beck ruling. tigator\ \cr\cd J\ \,>Iutitcersin 3 Mondale FEC's continuing ellorl\ to underinine One FEC proposal would allow Big phone h;inh. h.d ctig~gedin illegal oppii. free \perch. 8 ...... :

After \\ Inning one 01 the most dramat- - . ic victoric\ in 1' S. clectoml history. top union official\ arc n(iu wll-positioned to enacl their entirc. political wish list in the first huiidred d+\ of the Clinton Admin- istriiti(iii. For thc fir.! ~inxsince Jinmy Caner's narrw 19X triumph. the union po!itical machinc. ha, elected a union-label presi- dent ;I\ ne11 ii\ a Congrcs\ eager to rub- ber-stclmp BI; Lahor's lorcrd-unionism agcnJ;i. Clinton'+ ~OII~ILI~\I.along with Orga- nixd Labor', continuing control of the LIS. Senale. piiiiii 10 ;I "honeymoon" Gn Capitol Hill rh;it may prow a nightmare for the Anierican people.

Union Hierarchy Bought I Candidate Clinton

Bill Clinton could never have made his dramatic journey from the Statrhouse in Little Roch. Ark.. to the White House withnut [he hnckiiig of Organized Lahor's 512 hillion empire. And union official5 would only deliver the Democratic nomination and the presi- dency to Bill Clinton on one condition: that he embrace their entire coercive pro- gram. In their campaign hook. Pitrring Peo- ple firsr. Clinton and his running mate. AI Gore. complied. and uttered the words that secured Clinton's pact with Big After pluying the unioti bosscp ' time during his cuinpuign. President-elect Bill Clinton is Lahor: "We suppon the repeal of Section eager 10 work hand-in-hand wilh Congress IO enor1 Orxanimi Labor's agenda. 14(h)of the Taft-Hanky Act." Repeal of Section 14th) would instanl- Iy destroy all 21 slate Right to Work law. A\ pan 01 hi, hnrfiiiii with the union elite. Clinton tapcrl! \

J'W Conquest 11ii.i'~'-7 In 1989 and 1990. both the L1.S teacher certification standards" hoard and House and U.S. Senate voted overwhelm empower this agency to call the shots in ingly to gut the Hatch .Act. every school in Ail1trica from its Wash- Kennedy'.; Puhhbutton Strike hill ;is soon Only ~ill-ou!oppositioii from the ington. D.C. hcadquartcr\. As reported by University Virginia as it reaches his desk. National Right to Work Committee of political science professor Larry Sabato. The Strike bill swept through the US. secured ;I veto from ;I now-defeated Pres- the "NEA [union) is going to have a House of Representatives in 1991 and ideot George Bush and saved the Hatch enjoys the backing of the heavy union- Act at that time. major role in shaping education policy under a Clinton Administralioii." label majority of U.S. senators. In dozens of states where the NEA The Strike bill would enable union Teacher Union Mastem barons are currently able to dictate who despots to force employers to fine. To 'Shape' Clinton gets a teaching job. taxpayers are already demote or even fire workers who defy Education Policy being gouged to pny for soaring "educa- strike orders, thus sharply increasing Big tion" expenditures even as school chil- Labor's power to blackniail "uncoopera- Political observers predict the top dren lean less and less. brass of the 2.1-million strong National tive" businesses. destroy jobs. and jack The whole nation may face a similar up inflation and taxes. Education Association (NEA) teacher fate. unless National Right to Work Com- President-elect Clinton is even union will wield enormous clout in the mittee members and other citizens mobi- promising to assist government union Clinton Administration. lize against Clinton'\ \ell-out of educa- bosses' drive to take over the giant feder- Clinton's NEA overseers are sure to tion to the NEA bosses. al bureaucracy by supporting repeal of demand that he deliver federal tax dollars the 53-year-old federal Hatch Act. to an NEA-controlled, so-called "national Sw Pact pge 7

Squandering the record high public gent public disclosure rules. approval ratings he enjoyed little over a One of the union hipip' most cffec- year ago, President George Bush equivo- tive types of "soft" money rxpcnditures cated himself and his party into a humlli- ~~~~~~~~~~~~ is the phone bank. ating 370-168 electoral vote defeat in Statfeed by paid or unpaid union "vol- ourselves. .e unteers," these bank\ conduct partisan November at the hands of Big Labor can- voter registration and support grt-out-tht- didate Bill Clinton. 6ciinton~~~~~~~~ Bush's landslide defeat can largely be vote drives for candid;lte\ of the uiuon- attributed to one fatal flaw: his inability have won without label. to forcefully confront his enemies and In 1992. press reports credited AFL- oprcly embrace his friends. [Organized] CIO phone hunks with gcneriiting record The most powerful force opposing turnout on Election DJL tor Clinton/Gore Bush's reelection was the union-boss William N. Bywater and local kind-picked uiuiiii-ho\s candi- dates in all 50 htates. political machine. which illegally spent International Union of tens of millions of dollars in workers' Some examples: Electrical Workers Resident Union political operilti\rs hlunketed forced dues to put Arkansas Cov. Clinton in the White House. State uith 350 wparaw phone Yet, throughout his term. Bush hanks. These included a ttt11) automalrd ignored the repeated requests of Right to one run by Ainericw Fsder;iti(in of State. Union Bras Scheme County and Municipal Eini)loyee* Work members that he forcefully con- (AFSC.ME) union hw\r\. front Big Labor's illegally-funded politi- To Undercut Poiitid Union agents dclugd uith cal empire. Finance Restrictions over 1.500 calls a night li'm one union Then after an election-year conversion local in Ponland. during the spring primaries when Bush Reponed contributions hy union polit- 0 And in Columhu\. Olit~i.union ofti- belatedly announced modest measures to ical action ummitters (PACs) represent cials operated a .iO-mliri phcine hank. the curtail illegal union-boss spending. he only an e\tiinated Yrt of the total Big .JPL-CIONew hraggecl Scptember 3. failed to follow through. Labor contrihutions made to union-boss On Election it v.t>rkc.d. Kew As a result of the Bush Administra- lapdog candidates. Da). York. Oregon and Ohin .dl \bent for Bill tion's feeble efforts to implement the More importonr >re the "in-kind" 0.' "soft" money contributions that union Clinton and wilt union.l.ihe1 wutorh to Supreme Court's Beck decision barring Washington. bosses \Iphon otf trom their massive forced-dues politics. union political czars The AFL-CIO coordinated it% phone forced-due, \lu\h funds. bragged that Bush's Executive Order c;impaign with direct in;iiltng\ :md a hupr 11-800 would have "no effect'' on their The\? hiddrii ionirihution\ ;ire not electioiieering schemes. subject to etihcr yxnding limits or rtrin- Sec, Slush Fund !l<'.ll /'".$" 2 their dues wed for p(il~iii;~lpurpohes. refused to make a clearly pro-Right to But Lahor Seeretar! I.>nn Martin Work appointment to the NLRB. (~,W,,!,,,<,/11Illli t,,.L', : nwer found timc to cm! tn~tthew mea- Committee members warned Bush canvas\inp eltciri ,Armed with "persua- sures. Though she did have time to about the foolhardiness of pandering to riw card\" and handhill\. AFL-CIO can- endorse compulhor) uni~)niwi. the desires of the union brass throughout \a>serh got out the union-boss message In a pre-elecrion jnier\iew. Martin his tenure as President. lace to facc boasted to syndicated iolk show host Bush didn't listen and the union politi- Larry King that during her political cal machine made him pay dearly at elec- Teacher Unions career she has "oppmed Right to Work tion time. AbProvide Millions laws." "We congratulated ourselves" for con- ]In Illicit Services Not until 6 dup belorr Buhh's elec- tributing to Bush's defeat. said William toral shellacking did ,Martin finally issue H. Bywater, president of the International Union ho\\r. (uund other more direct ... ,way\ to delner the White House to Bill ,Clinron.

~'.. The National Education Association ... 'INEAI union. lor exaniple. "loaned" ' ;approniniar~~l!00 01 its 500 political stalter3 to the C'linronlGorr campaign and .planned to h;i\r around 100 staff in the -::'fisltlduring thc 1a\t tuo w,eeks before .. ielcctiori d;i!, plmtcd Dehra DeLee. direc- 'tor 01 g~i\ernriicnirelations for the NEA I.~-union in the Octoher 1-1 issue of Ediccu-

: i rirrrr l\'wL. hlan! NE:\ 3tate or local subsidiary ,>unionre\en piid tur substirute teachers :so that teacher union political zealots could c;lnip;iipi Cull time at the end of the election ~ea~~iii. And for iiiw (11 19Y1. the NEA union convened iis niiinthl! and weekly publi- cation3 inici blatant propaganda lor Clin- torilGore and othcr favored candidareb. They even mailed ten5 of thousands of new' financial reporting form\ (LM?s) poster5 to thrir tcachcrs nationwide to Union of Electronic Workers. display at 5chc)iilh. designed to clearly illustrutc union politi- "He [Clinton] couldn't have won with- cal spending. out [Organized] Labor." Bywater crowed. Bush Labor Appointees This was much too late to \,low down Ignored Big Labor Abuses Big Labor's illegal schemes. Bush Intransigence Paved way Other Bush otficials ohmuctcd Beck For Big Labor's Emdskide During 1992. w,hile this massive polit- enforcement, ical operation ua5 hu*ily insuring the James Stephens. National Labor Rela- With Bush appointees delaying 2nd elrc-tion of uriicwlnhd cmdidafes in open tions Board (NLRB) chairman and a declawing enforcement of Beck rights, defiance of tedeml larr. Bush Adminis- 1990 Bush appointee. vowed in May to Big Labor was able to deploy its best tration appoinfeer did nothing to crack draft 5rt.k regulations that "fit the needs'' campaign technology with impunity. down on this crooked activity. of union brass. With massive off-the-books campaign Even after George Bush finally heeded In September, Stephens and several donations. Big Labor has now obtained in Right to Work members' pleas and issued other Bush appointees on the NLRB Bill Clinton a rubber-stamp President to Executive Order 12800. his appointees made good on his pledge, putting forth collaborate with a compliant Congress. delayed and derailed any meaningful proposed Beck rules that alloa Big Labor Bush and his pro-Big Labor burzau- action until it with too late. to spend workers' forced dues on a u,ide crats ignored this massive evasion of Bush's order required employers with variety of activities explicitly banned by statutory and constitutional law aimed at federal contracts to notify workers of the Supreme Court. themselves and the American prople in a their right not to pyfor union-boss poli- Right to Work supporters spent Bush's misguided attempt to avoid confrontation ticking and other noncollective bargain- first three years in office deluging him with the union bosses. ing activitiss. with appeals to act on I914 right enforce- As a result. union kingpins now have .At the \;iiiie tiiiie. liii\li tlirc'cted [lie II~L'II~to \lo\\ do\vn [hi\ u~ii(~~i-h~i\~jup- the poliriccll IIILI~CIC both to enact tlic'ir Lahor Depaniiiriii UI ltmitilatc rule3 it1r gernaut. economy-~reckingagenda and to further uniwi riiwnher3 to rwrtioii01 Ignoring those pleas. the President enrich thrir campaign machine. p 3 National Education Association (NEA) ic stonewal~ingand deceptive accounting union officials are breaking the law. practices, the NEA hierarchy manage to Over rhe Jast decade. rhe CDIJ~Shave keep many of the union's 2.1 million repeatedly barred NEA union bosses members in the dark about its true activi- from using teachers' compulsory-union ties. But even the NEA's own data paints dues to build their political empire and a damning picture of its illegally-funded finance other activities unrelated to col- political machine. lective bargaining. The NEA chart reproduced below. But that's precisely what NEA union adapted from one appearing in NE4 Now, bigwigs continue to do. shows clearly that NFA bigwigs continue The NEA union's own published data to defy the courts arid seize dues for PR - combined with evidence unearthed in campaigns. unspecified lawsuits and other recent coun cases - shows clearly that the activities ruled nonchargeable in recent NEA union brass continue to divert 66 Io court rulings. 90 percent of teachers' forced dues into Of the average $96 in dues paid to the politics and other nonbargaining aciiviues. national NEA union annually by teachers "Even the most consrrvativr analysis and other school employees. the chart of the NEA's published expenditures shows that only 56.5 I was allocated for reveals a simple fact: NEA union officials. "'contract negotiation" - 7 percent of the in flagrant violation of the law. spend total. Bill Clinron has carered Io flit NEA elite more money advancing their own political By contrdst. NEA union bosses udmit- by flooring e.r-NEA chief Mu? Ftmell as agenda than on any other union activity." red spending nearly three times that much his education secreruar?.. charged Mark Mix, the Committee's vice - $15.28 - on exclusively nonbargain- president for shxe Jegislarion. ing acfivities.including politics. ing parelits snd taxpayers who rrsisc "It's bad enough to prohibit teachers (In addition to national NEA union "agcncy shop" schemes forcing teachers lo from negotiating with school boards for dues. teachers pay an average $200 to pay tribute to NEA union chiefs. themselves - and then force them to pay 5300 every year to state and local NEA The result: declining student achieve- 'fees' for Big Labor 'representation' -- subsidiaries.) ment test scores and skyrocketing educa- but compelling teachers to pay for poli- The Committee estimates at least 50 tion costs as NEA union bosses win con- tics they disagree with really takes the percent of the balance of NEA union dues trol over more and more schools. cake." Mix added. is funnelled into political and lobbying In the 21 states permitting agency activities hidden behind labels like "Gen- shop contracts. for example. taxpayers Funding for NEA Union-Bm eral Field Assimnce." "External Public had to pay an average of 51 531 inore to Politics Shrouded in Secrecy Relations." "Legal Defense'' and the educate a student during the 1989-90 biggest. "L'niServ Stafting." school year than taxpayers in non-agency Through a comhination of bureaucrat- It's likely most teachers have never shop states. heard of L'niSew. Yet, UniScw absorbs INI~rlrun N jfih court Sheds Eight on of all national NEA union dues. and is union-Boss Politics, nothing less than a forced dues-fundrd cadre of political operatives who, posing Spells out Teachers' Righas as "educators." buy votes for Big Labor The National Right to Work Commit- candidates and compulsory-unionism leg- tee is striving to shut off the llow of com- islation every*here. pulsory-union dues into the YEA union (See "Forced-Dues Politics Sank bosses' political empire b) palsing state Bush's Rerlwtion Hopes." pages 2-3.) Right to Work laws u hich would climi- The training manual for the more than nate the NEA union autocrats forceddues I .500 well-paid UniServ operatives is a privileges. tract long considered the "bible" of radi- The Committee is aiw weking rep1of cal politics. the late Sau! Alinsky's Rules monopoly bargaining I;bir\ hich compel .fir Rudiculs. conscientious teacher5 to ~cccptunion mil- In it. UniServ operatives can read itants as their "exclusive reprewntaiives." about Alinxky's commitment lo power But until such law\ :ire passed. the over principle. Committee's .;is[:: organiration. the "lr is [he creation of the instrument or National Right io Work Legal Defense the circumstances of power that provides Foundation. is fighting Iv protect teach- The NEA's own figures reveal that NEA the reamn." r\lin>ky wrote. ers' rights in the couns - uhich hare left miun bosses illegally divert ut least tivo- Heeding their mentor's advice. UniServ little doubt about ahat union hohscs ccin rhirds of feuclrer.s'fiirced dws iiiro poli- operative\ ha\e limhed their efforts on ~.rrpu,w rics triid other nonburguiiiirig ucriti/ies. controlling Iwal \chool boards and silenc- .srr Scam 4 ed pursuit of power and total contempt "That means everyone interested in for the cows shows that the only perma- protecting the constitutional rights of c,~,,l,,,,'~~'tl~~~~~:,WO 4 nent solution to their abuse of teachers' teachers and other public employees must rights is to enact state Right IO Work laws get behind the Committee's efforts to and cannor do u ith teachers' forced dues. and repeal state laws sanctioning union enact Right to Work statutes in every sin- In IWI. the V.S. Supreme Court ruled monopoly representation. in Lch~~rrL. f-c,rris Fuculrj Assnciarioii gle state." Only then would reachers be able to He urged leachers victimized by NEA that nonunim teachen Sorced to pay dues refuse "representation" by union bosses union bosses to as a conditicvr of eniployment (an "agen- under "agency shop" schemes that force contact the National cy lee"r c'iliiiioi he compelled to finance them to fund Big Labor's political Right to Work Committee and its educa- activitim not dircctl) related to collective machine. tion wing, Concerned Educators Against bargaining lor their unit. "The Couns have repealedly ordered Forced Unionism (CEAFU). In Lc'hrivr:. the Michigan judge who the NEA hierarchy to open irs books and Teachers and others interested in edu- initinll! tried the case concluded that YO let teachers exercise their constitutional cation who would like more information rnr of cmipulwry agency fees paid rights," said Right to Work Committee about CEAFU should write Cathy Jones ~'.. : to an NE.A alliliare by teachers at Ferris Vice President Mark Mix. at 8001 Braddock Rd., Springfield, Va. -- . State Unitervt! were illegall! spent on "But they won't play by the rules. 22160, or call (703) 321-8519. ~~: nonh;trgsining iicfis,ities.

~.. .j Thekc acti\ IIICS included support for

~ the nuclsar Ircc/c movement. lobbying to rili\tl hlichipan propen? taxes. and many

~ . public relanom campaigns. : * The L1.S Supreme Court agreed and declared union ho\\e\ violated the teach- William K. Lomason, vice chairman ers' Firs1 Amendment right of free speech of the National Right to Work Commit- hy cmnpdlrrig them to pay for union pol- iticking. tee. died of cancer September 2 in Atlanta. Ga., at the age of 82. NEA to Court: So A philanthropist who generously What?! shared his time and money with a vari- Confident that their deceptive ety of worthy causes. Bill Lomason accounting praciiceh w,ill stymie any devoted much of his life to protecting teacher tr) :rig to ehercise his constitution- American workers' freedom to choose al rights. NEA union barons continue to whether or not to join a union. publicly del! the L'OU~L. As chairman of the board of Douglas Following Lr.hnr~r/.the National Right Lomason Company, a Nonh Ameri- to Worh Lrpal Defense Foundation can automobile parts supplier headquar- renewed a hitter legal hattle with the Indi- tered in Farmington Hills. Mich., Lorna- son's company provided jobs for over 5500 people. He expanded the operations of the Indiana teacher>. Foundation attorneys 90-year-old company, co-founded by challenged IEA ofticials to prove their his father, from the original plant in Bill Lomason will be missed but has claim that the? spent 95 percent of non- Detroit to over 20 factories in 11 states. already inspired many to continue his members' due\ on collective bargaining. Though he was a successful business- fight for worker freedom. (The'1EA'Iiad'ptL'viods~'SLLedmore man, Lomason's support for Right to :. . ., than 1.000 nonunion Indiana teachers to Work was grounded in his concern over Trustees of the National Right to Work intimidate them intu forking over fees compulsory unionism's harm 10 workers. Legal Defense Foundation. equal Io 95 percent OS full union dues.) Lomason dared to fault General As a resident of Georgia, Lomason This June. an Indiana Supreme Coun Motors (GM)management for selling actively supported that state's Eghr ro judge sided with Foundation attorneys in out its employees to union chieftains iz Work law. Albro II Indjunu ~d~~l~~Jl~O~l.4ssoriaiion. schemes that eroded GM's competitive- Since he was born in Detroit and ordering !he IEA to pay back $120,ooO in ness and destroyed jobs - even though maintained strong ties lo Michigan. illegd forced dues and slash their nonmem- GM was Lomason's main customer. Lomason also led the Michigan Right to bers' forced dues hy at least 50 percent. Work Association. But. defying both the U.S. and Indiana bmawrn Advanced "Bill's leadership and encourage- Supmme Coum. EAofficials responded by Worker Freedom ment in our organization will be greatly miling letters to nonunion teachers wm- missed,'' said Committee President ing them !hey would hc charged "about the In Variety of Roles Reed Larson. same percent as before" the ruling. The Comnunee's Board elected Bill 'This stalwart of the Right to Work Right t~ Work Laws Key to Lomason Vice Chairman of the Board in movement has inspired the rest of us in 1970 after he served 3 years as a member. Winning Teachers' Rights our quest to attain full worker freedom He also served on the Board of in America." I..arson added. 8 The NE.\ union oiiicials' single tnind- 5 Tht wandal-pl.ipcd L'nited \Yay I)!' Big Labor Flunkies eliminates conipetitise hiclding. That ,.\merlcn (LtV.41. reeling trom the On the United Way PayroU cnww the w\t d pnn idIng ..\cryice." alleged financial inismanagement ~ttd to the needy will 2150 \!iyn)cket. Such management practices quarider contribu- \vasie of its former president, William Besides promising to buy Big Labor. Aramony. still won't come clean on its the United Way grants union officials the tions. and provide a sneaky way of sweetheart deal with AFL-CIO bigwigs. extraordinary privilege of placing union diverting substantial amounts of money to unionmachine organizing. The deal. outlined in ;I clandestine agents on the UWA payroll. "Cooperative Rfcmorandum of Under- The pact rcquires the UWA to hire a At Risk standing Between the United Way and "Director of Labor Panicipation" and six United Way's Reputation the AFL-CIO." includes requirements full-time AFL-CIO "Community Ser- that the charity discriminate against Unfortunately. the United Way of vices Liaison Representatives," all cho- America received a rop rating from the goods. sewices and suppliers that don't sen by AFL-CIO fat cats. wear the union label. National Charities Information Bureau. These strategically placed union issued just before the disclosure of What's more, the U'NA even agrees to enforcers guarantee United Way officials hire union operatives to mn United way alleged corruption aid cronyism. includ- will kowtow to the An-ClOs top brass. "community service projects." ing the wanton misuse of funds by former This humiliating concession ponrays a President William Ararnony. United Way leadership prostrate before A History of Dirimination Public confidencc in the UWA Organized Labor. remains low. and contrihtitions iire down. Against Nonunion Workers The corruption spiwned by UWA's United Way Keeps Everting unholy pact with the union hierarchy has The anti-freedom Memorandum of Cash to Big Laim yet to be addressed. Understanding has dictated United Way Indeed. in response to an inquiry last policy for decades. The Committee has repeatedly urged June by National Right to U'orh Commit- The National Right to Work Commit- tee President Reed Laison. then-interim tee first exposed the then-secret agree- the United Way to terminate these poli- cies that transier contributions directly to UWA President Kenneih Uain denied ment in 1971. there was anything untouard in the At that time. the United Way promised hand-picked union bosse. But the United Way st "hleniorandum of Understanding." [he AFL-CIO it w>ould "purchase, when- Dam implau\ibly confended the past ever available. only union-made goods The UWA continues to spend donors' funds to install union-boss operatives on "simply indicates that the two organiza- and services." tions will work together in nieeting the ser- its staff and. thereby. discriminate against Beset by donors outraged that their vice needs of our country." In other words, nearly 90 percent of American workers charitable contributions were funding Big business as usual at CWh headquiiners. Labor. the UWA "revised" the Memoran- who hare chosen not to join a union. duni in 1979. The new agreement retains By favoring a handful of union-boss A Chace bo Start Fmh? the same preferential policy. only in suppliers. the UWA guarantees that over- slightly different words: the United Way head costs will continue to balloon. The Uriited Way htr :iriothsr chance to of America "will conrinue to purchase Excluding the overwhelming majority of restore public confidence nou that iorrner union made goods and services whenever potential sources of goads and services. Peace Corps directi,r El;iine Chao has reasonably available." because they're nor "union only," a11 hut assumed control. She faces a dauniing LA: rntrtring the crcdibiility of a chllrity ri\cii uiih chargea of waste and tnismanagr'nitnt. Step one is for Chilo [ti hced Commit- tee President Reed Liirqon', .idvice and repudiate the infamou\ Sleiiii>randurnof Understanding. Larwn \\II>Ic C'hao thi5 month. urging her 10 tcrininate the UWh's policy of \en ins .I\ ii I irtual front for the AFL-CIO. "Perhaps the United \.\';I) has wrren- dered so much to [he uiiioii ho\\e\ that it's too late to hre;ih tree.'. Laraon observed. "But nothing will ch;ingt a\ Ions il\ the 'hlemorandum of L'nclcr\t-nDianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Russell Then, the Committee will reach out to reaches the White House." Larson con- Feingold (D-Wis.) over anti-Strike bill as many of the 754 of Americans who cluded. incumbents. But they may have fallen agree with Right to Work as its finances just short of their goal. allow. Union Bosses Still Run Senate, Before the elections, Commitfee meni- "We will need to do a lot :o iurn the But commietee9s~fforts bers in several states prevailed upon candi- hear up on Bill Clinton and Congress ill1 Avert Total Disaster dxcs tor open Srniite \eat\. includinp Dirk the way to the ineltiny point." Larwn wid Kcniprhome (R-l&.th~ii and kbCl7 Bennett "But the Coiwnittec's tnemhcrs aren't In addition tu their monui~~cnialcam- (R-Utah). to vo\v re4stance to the Strike quitters. They will keep fightin; until a11 p";n IIJ c.li.ct Hill Cliiii<)nprc\idi!nt. hill itnd dl forms of forced unionism. the politicians cry 'uncle!"' 7 WELLINGTON. NEW ZEALAND - Labor Relations Act. prevent employees Bolstered by an 18-month old national from negotiating directly with their Right to Work law banning compulsory- employers about wages. benefits and work union membership. this secluded South rules. even if the employees don't desire Pacific island nation. located some 900 union niemkenhip or representation. miles southeast of Australia. is beginning to recover from years of economic stag- AFL-CIO Chieftain sea iiation and high unemployment. Threat to Privileges The New Zealand economy failed to grow at all from I986 to mid-1991 and American union bosses shrilly defend the criiical manufacturing sector was their monopoly-bargaining power to herd shrinking. workers under Big Labor conrrol. But once the new federal Right to Then union officials turn around and Work law took effecr in May 1991. the use this jealously guarded power. which picture staned to brighten. they hypocritically call a "burden." to The New Zealand GDP has rrlured to justify forcing workers to pay their "fair and grow at a healthy 3% annual rate. share" in union dues for "reprexntation" manufacturing expons are soaring 150 a the workers never wanted. yea. AFL-CIO fat cats are decrying the All this has occurred despite B world- Respoi?dbi,q to hroad public support for removal of Big Labor's miinopoly-bar- wide economic slowdown. wnrkrr frrrilom, Prime Minister Bolger (The successful reform has caught the huiinrdfiwcrcf uiiion;.sm in 1991. gaining "burden" in New Zealand. attention of Australian workers and busi- Referring fo the refonn as ;I "deregula- nesses still languishing under Big Labor laws. New Zealand labor bosses seized tion virus," the Augu.~tI7 .4FL.z-C/0 "dies monopoly. more special privilexes than in practically wailed that its most "onerim a5pect" is In October. voters in the southeast any other lree world country. the "so-called freedom to contract." Australian state of Victoria elected a new The increasingly competitive world Citing New Zealand union chief Ken government committed to following New economy in the 1980s drove home the Douglas, the AFL-C/O .SPII.Vimparted Zealand's example by repealing forced message to New Zeoland workers and with a shudder that thi5 ineiins "unions unionism.) businessmen that they could no longer are required to represent indit idual work- "New Zedand's economic renaissance afford to be shackled by compulsory ers only at their rqwt." provides Americans with a glimpse of the unionism. AFL-CIO Prehident LJne Kirkland magnificent boom our country could set New Zealand's National Party. one of knows full well [hat hi, political off by repealing coercive federal labor the country's two major political parties. machine's iron grip (her Cimgrehs will Ii~ws." declared Reed Larson, president of responded to growing public sentiment make it very difficult to replicate the New the National Right to Work Committee. by making a campaign promise to restore Zealand reform in the Cnilcd Sts~es. "The New Zealand experience also the Right to Work. Nonetheless. Kirkland ha\ reacted proves we can win. Decades-old forced- The National Pany then routed the rul- with alarm. unionism statutes are not set in stone in ing Labour Pan? in the 1990 frderol elec- In January. the National Right to Wtvik Australia. Canada or the United States. tions. taking 68 out of 97 seats in Parlia- Committee is launching a rcnei\ed Ieg- Pro-Right to Work citizens can unite and ment. islative drive to repeal [he monopoly-hu- abolish destructi\,e laws," Lason contin- After assuming office. the new prime gaining provisions in icderal labor law. ued. minister. Jim Bolger. acted immediately thus protecting American ~\orkerxl'rom to keep the National Pany's promise. compulsory union reprewntatitm. Popular Rebellion Bolger sv.iftly uhhered through Parlia- Kirkland apparentl) tear\ the Commit- Led to 1991 Labor Act ment legislation that abolished forced tee may in time succeed in ;hi> eifm union membcrship and union officials' "We cannot assume [hi\ irce-market Big Labor politicians gave New monopoly-bargaining privileges, under idolatry will stay in Ne\* Lealand." the Zealand union czars the power to force which nonunion workers are forced Io AN-CIO chief hurled. workers to join unions back in 1936, only accept union-ho>s "representation" in "It is a global msrke[place and one year after American union boss-pup- contract negoriations. employers are eager to uw he notion oi pet politicians did the same thing. Monopoly-hargaining statutes. such as internationitl competiii\ciic.\ . . . to limit Unimpeded by state Right to Work those impwd in the U.S. by the National our collective action." he r.oncluded.

I I 8 2

VOLUME 38, NUMBER 10 October 11982

:.. With the 1992 campaigns in their final :.’ . stages. Big Labor’s political machine is

~.i : poised to capture the prize union officials have sough; for decades - a veto-proof ..super majority in both chambers of Congress and a puppet in the White House, Arkansas GOY.Bill Clinton has fully caved in to union-boss political pressure by vowing to support federal legislation that would nullify all 21 state Right to Work law. In his campaign book. Purring People Firs:. Clinton and his running mate, Ten- nessee Sen. AI GoIe. promise to “suppon the repeal of Section 14(b) of !he Taft- Hartley Act.” which would instantly wipe out every state‘s liberty to protect its citi- zens‘ Right to Work. (For more on Clin- ton. seep. 3.) With President Bush’s mixed record on compulson unionism and his personal ythe union bosses .wr*epIIrc Srnurr and rkr Wnite House. Clinton i’ow’sIO abolish all unpopularity hurting Right to Work can- Rigkr ro Work lam: “Wr .support rlw repeal of Srcrion 14(h)of the Taft-HartleyArt.“ didates in the polls. the only hope of tum- ing the tide is the National Right to Work across America the right to withhold sup- sought exclusively by and for federal Committee’s Citizen Alert program. in pon for union-boss strikes without being postal union czars - failed in 1990 by which Committee members are putting penalized or even tired as a result. only two Senate votes. heat on Senate candidates to answer the passageof the bill would incite a wave If this bill had passed. 2.9 million fed- Committee’s 1991 Survey fully in favor of violent. national strikes. destroying eral workers would have been dragooned of Right to Work. into a new union-boss political machine, jobs and reigniting infla:ion. While politicians beholden to Big imperiling the freedom of countless ordi- Labor have long controlled the U.S. And Sen. John Glenn’s (D-Ohio) House of Representatives, Right to Work Hatch Act repeal (S. 914/H.R. 20) - See Sweep page 2 advocates have valiantly maintained a ioehold in the Senate sufficient to stave off countless forced-unionism proposals. But a shift of even two or three Senate Whatever Y’all Want Nat’l Endowment for Coercion seats could give union lobbyists the extra Bill Clinron trades home stutr’s Riglir Taxpayer dollars help AFL-CIO build muscle they need lo ram a whole range of compulsory-unionism statutes into law. to Work to u11ion nro~uls....._...... 3 M.orldnide empire .... ~ ...... 7 For instance. this June, Sen. Ted Kennedy’s (D-Mass.) Pushhutton Strike hill failed to pass the Senate by only three votes. Th? jiih-dcbtrtl! in$ Strike hill (S. 5VH.R. 5). which >teamrolled through the House in 1991. would deny irorkers to take a stand against forced unionism b supporters by pledging steadfast opposi- answering the Right to Work Survey. tion to forced unionism in his 1992 Sur- 1 vcy. while Hogsett has not responded. [ ‘I ,Vf,,,!,,~,I/I ?,or,“,<’<’ I Seymour’s tailurc 10 answer the Sur- vey is puzrlinp, hince he voted in June to nary citizens. block passage of the Strike bill. Seizing just a kw more seats in the But Ms. Feinstein‘s silence is easier to Senate could empower the union bosses understand. events Sen: Frank to pass a host of other coercive schemes She has already pocketed more than - including even repeal of Section I4b) S156.000 in Big Labor cash alone, and of the Taft-Hartley Act. perhaps IO times that amount in union- And many political experts are pre- machine political “soft” money, like h unionism, has dicting Organized Labor will achieve sig- phone banks, paid “volunteers,” and par- failed thus far nificant advances this campaign year. tisan get-out-the-vote drives. to answer his Right to Work survey. Challenger Tony Smith (D) is also Union Strategists Jubilant New Hampshire keeping his views on Right to Work a Over Campaign Prospects Granite State Right to Work secret from Alaska citizens, but in his supporters avidly hope that the case the union bosses have let the cat out ...... With an estimated 5350-400million successor to retiring pro-Right to of the bag by launching phone banks, -.... hidden campaign war chest illegally Work Sen. Warren Rudman will door-to-door campaigns. and other hid- :..! amased from workers‘ forced-union dues. also oppose compulsory unionism. den “soft money“ political activities to ...... buy Smith’s loyalties. ti union political operatives are confident Democratic candidate John Rauh. dar- they will make the gains they need to enact ling of the AFL-CIO. is in a horse race the special interest legislation they want. with Republican Gov. Judd Cregg. .. Big Labor’s massive forced-dues sup- L.ike Raufi. Gregg has balked at The retirement of Sen. Steve , i..: ..~...... port explains why it holds such a answering his Right to Work Survey. Symms (R), a leader in the -.. -. i; i formidable grip over Senate incumbents Union lobbyists give Gregg due credit for Committee’s battle to stop the and challengers. killing a Right to Work bill behind the hushbunon Strike bill. threatens ...... Union-boss puppet incumbents such scenes in New Hampshire this year. to leave a big hole in the Com- .....- as Wyche Fowler (D-Ga.), Richard Shel- Only Independent candidate Larry mittee’s thin line of defense in the Senate. >: .~. by (D-Ala.) and Tom Daschle /D-S.D.) Brady has responded 10 his Survey fully Vying for the seat are union-label Rep. show no sign of abandoning their alle- in favor of worker freedom. Richard Stallings (D). who voted for the .. .. :[. .. giance to the union hierarchy and forced- Strike bill and Hatch Act repeal, and

_i:~/2 ..I dues politicking. Boise Mayor Dirk Kempthome (R). who And the union political chieftains have Senate challenger Joe “I am has promised to support Right foWork. a shining opportunity to increase the nion!“ Hogsett (D) raked in a number of Big Labor lapdogs in the Sm- inimum of $800,000 in union ate this year: . contributions for his successful 1990 race for Secrelq of Sure. Having assembled another $232.000 Appointed Sen. John Sey- in union PAC money for his new cam- mour (R) and challenger paign. Hogrett is obviously in Big Rep. Wayne Owens (DI. I supporter Dianne Feinstein (D) - Labor’s pocksr. of the Kennedy Strike bill and Big who is way ahead in the Incumbent Dan Coats (R) has heeded Labor’s Hatch Act repeal. is attempting polls - have both refused the requests of Indiana Righi to Work to conceal his pro-forced unionism record from concerned Ctuh cisizens by stonewalling requests that he answer his Right to Work Survey. However. Owens can’t hide the over $622.000 in union kingmakers’ cash he has accepted over the past six years (making Rep. Owens the wcond great- est recipient of Organized Labor’s largess now in the entire Congress). Owens’s opponent. businessman Roben Eennett (R). came out whole- heartedly in Favor of Right 10 Work this August after hearing from Utah Right to Work advocates.

Committee Counterattacks With ‘Citizen Alert‘ Ph In a lasr-ditch hid to prevttnt a Big Labor romp this hll. the National Right

Srr Counterattack fit>.vr puet’ LITTLE ROCK - On the presidential campaign trail. Arkansas Gov. Bill Clin- ton (D) is crwing abut his home state's vibrant job market and light tax burden to convincc .Anierican voters that he holds the ke) to reviving our stagnant national econoni!. In a sHap tor the union political machine's minaive. behind-the-scenes support. houc\er. Clinion has vowed to .: destroy one 01 \he most imponant factors . . behind Ark;msa>'s prosperity: its Right to .: ..Work la\\. Though Gov. Clinton doesn't "want to be taggrd as IOrpmized] Labor's candi- ' date." as one union boas admitted to the :..' L0.y Att,qcs/c'.\ltntt3.v. Clinton's sellout ...~ i gives union polilical agents the green

~ light lo "carry the water and get the guy -- elecred."

...- : Aa Arkansa governor for nearly I? years. Clinton recognized the overwhelm- . . ing popularti! of the state.'^ Right to .. '. Work law. ...: Even during the New Hampshire pri- all the way. Pushbutton Strike bill (S. SS/H.R. 5). mary campaign. Clinton said that. while On May I I. the AFL-CIO No+~scon- which would force employers to punish he opposed pa\sing more state Right to Work lawh. hc wouldn't tell people in firmed that he had pledged to wipe out all or even fire workers who defy Big Labor states that have already banned forced 21 state Right to Work laws. strike orders. unionism "they don'i have the right to Clinton's staff declared he would sign The Strike si!! would tear the hem out Section make [that] decision." repeal of Taft-Hartley 14b) "as of Arkansas's and other state Right to But that wam't enough for the bosses soon as it reaches his d4." Work laws by stripping employees of their of Big Labor - on whom his nominaion Bill Clinton has also pledged his sup- depended. Clinton soon was forced IO go port for Sen. Ted Kennedy's (D-Mass.) See Clintonpuge 6

Thanks to a strong Cornminee mem- support of its many dedicated members bership pssh. many candidates who had to pay for the mailings. advertising. and Conlmirrd frcm pqpr 2 been sitting on the fence are currently on other methods that may be necessary," to Work Committee's 1992 "Citizen the record as fully supporting the Right to Larson added. Alert" program has now become a Work. (Cornminee members m encour- nationwide drive. aged to examine the enclesed roster.) 'Time Is Never Ti Short' This month. nearly 300,000 pro- But the Committee must do more to Right to Work citizens have been alen- alen additional workers, business peo- Although the formal deadline for ed to how their candidates answered the ple, consumers and taxpayers. answering the 1992 Survey has passed, 1992 Right to Work Survey, and the However. the Committee's capacity Committee members and other Right to to mobilize those Americans depends Committee has invited these members Work supporters need to continue their to pressure unresponsive candidates to on further financial support for the efforts to convince their candidates to stand up for worker freedom. Committee's Citizen Alert program, The final deadline for answering the Committee President Reed Larson said. resist the forces of compulsory unionism. 1992 Survey has now passed in every "We've made good progress so far They should continue trying to con- state. and the Committee is including a -but the union-boss machine is so rich vince those candjdates who are already full repon of the final results with this and powerful, Right to Work supporters beholden to the Big Labor bosses to repu- month's NEWSLETTER. can only fight back by speaking out diate forced-dues politicking. and thank The "Citizen Alert" enables Commit- loud, strong, and clear (and getting pro-Right to Work candidates for stand- tee members to turn up the heat on the friends and neighbors to do so. too). ing up for individual employees' rights. politicians - convincing them to heed "But. because warning the American "Although the hour is late. time is the vieus 01 the 75 percent of Americans people ih 311 exprn\ivc. undcrtahing. the never IOO sliorl to gel !OUT cantlidale who oppxcompulmn unionism. Committee will need the full financial on record." declared Reed Laraon.

3 tr. s anufacturiing Jobs Flee state as ig Labor ow Takes hIINNE..ZPOLIS - \V'hile Minnesota become an rxainplr of Ted Kcnnedy's union hosses bask in the coercive power vision of America - union-boss control granted to them uhen the state Legisla- forcing industry and growth to go else- ture passed a "clone" of Sen. Ted where. while Big Labor prospers and the Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill last rank-and-file suffer." said Reed Larson. year. jobs and growth are fleeing the president of the National Right to Work \late. Committee. 'The Minnesota Strike bill. a mirror "Two of the most prosperous cities in image of the economy-wrecking Iegisla- the CIS..Sioux Falls. South Dakota. and tion Kennedy (D-blass.). iz pushing in Fargo, North Dakota are both in Right to the U.S. Senate (H.R. S/S.S5). was Work states. and just over the border adopted last year by the Minnesota state from Minnesota - the only state with its own Pushbutton Strike law." continued .. L.cbi.7 s I aturc. The hill became law when Gov. Arne Larson. Carlson "forgot" to veto it until a dny loo Minnesota's industries are also mov- ing to neighboring Iowa. another Right to .. tare. The Strike legislation. now law. man- Work state. and Wisconsin. Wisconsin dates dismissal or other penalties for Gov. Tommy Thompson heeded worker freedom advocates by issuing a timeiy .~ workers who defy union-boss strike orders. veto of a Wisconsin Strike bill "clone" ...~ c.d,wi 1l.t \ rr:ri~rq,Mit~t~~.wtu'.s PitsAhrdt- .. A year later. Right to Work advocates' last year. rot1 Srrifc hill .slip lris tnitid. c.o.s~ingMin- ~arningshave been confirmed that the t~c~.~:~rmii/li~i~\uttds iijjthr. .. hlinnesota Strike bill would cause violent Big Labor Pushes mow Shte Strike Bills .. strikcs. hankruptcies and jobs (0 to guson points out in an ,August "Business other states. World" column. three of Minnesota's Within two weeks after Minnesota's most profitahk ;rnd highest-paying com- In addition to beeking more money Strike bill became law. a Teamsters panies - HoneyueII. Gnisys. and Con- and power, Big Labor chieftains are liiwyer told Ramsey County District trol Data - have cut their in-slate pay- backing state-level "clones" of the Judge Salvador Rusas that the new law rolls in hdf. Kennedy Strike bill as propaganda to put means union thugs cannot be enjoined And \IInn~s~~~~~~slargeht employer. more pressure on Congrcb\ to enact the from threatening or dmaging the proper- 3M. has adr.i\cd Clinnesora not to expect Pushbutton Strike bill. ty of bo-called "replacement" workers. any more plant\ to he built in the stale. The federal Strike bill has already Rather than face losses and bankrupt- Ferguhon concludes that manufactur- passed the U.S. House 01 Representa- cy trom exorbitant union-boss dcmands. ing as ;I \\hole. \chich until recently tives. However, sight to Work members employers are moving where the union enjoyed healthy growth in Xlinnesot;i. is across rhe nation have died union lob- bosses don't rule. now "drying up in the land 0' lakes." byists. only three vote^ \hart of their .As the \Vu// Sfrwr J:)itrnu/'s Tim Fer- "On a state scale, Minnesota has goal, from ramming the Strike bill through the Senate. Minnesota is the only \[ate. so far. to comply with Big Labor demands. Bur Big Labor is pushing Strike bill "clones" in Delaware. New Jersey. 'Llontana. Wis- consin. Illinois and Pennsylbmia. Minnesotans Fight To Get Jobs Back

With the assistance of the National Right to Work Conmitree. Minnesota cit- izens are rushing to stop the of jobs from their $t3te. Minnesotans for Freedom to Work - a new grassroots. state-leiel organization - has begun battling to liff the pall of compulsory unionism (ha1 hangs over Minnesota. Minnesotans concerned about the state's economic future \hould contact Kirk Shelly. in care of Minnesolans for Freedom to Work. 1041 Grand Ave.. #3SO. St. Paul. Minn. 55 105. DENVER - Bent on freeing their slate from the shackle\ of compulsory union- ism. Coloradam are fighting harder than ever to coni ince their state politicians to suppon the RIght to Work. Colorado Citizen\ for Right to Work. a nex group that has mobilized a groundsxell of grassroots support for worker freedom. is working toward pas- sage of a state Right to Work law. .. . With the help of the National Right to Work Committee. the Colorado group is about to kind up it\ 1992 Candidate Sur- vey program. in uhich pro-Right to Work ..~Coloradanr ha\e flooded candidates with .. thousands postcard\. letters and phone .. of ~. . calls urging thrm to renounce forced unionism. ~~ Already many poliricians who were Stare Sen. Ronnie Allison (left/ ond Rep. Stan Johnson were rossed out of the stare Leg- .. . .. riding the fence have come out against islarirre by consritirenrsfed up wiili their pro-union boss voring records. forced unionim ... And the Colorado Employee Rights codified the Supreme Coun’s Beck deci- And after accounting for living costs Campaign Committee (CERCC). the sion outlawin;,: the use of forced dues for and taxes, families in neighboring Right .... group‘s independently funded political politics. and Rep. Stan Johnson (D-Bout- to Work states enjoy real incomes that are action arm. is helping to elect targeted der) opposed a state Right to Work bill in roughly equal to or higher than those of pro-worker freedom candidates running 1991. Colorado families. against union-boss yes men. “Sen. Allison and Rep. Johnson This is true whether comparing big In the August 1 I primary. two notori- refused to stand up for worker freedom, urban centers like Denver and Salt Lake ous Big Labor incumbents lost to Right and angry constituents tossed them out of City. or smaller communities like Foe! to Work advocates. after being targeted their jobs.” observed Mark Mix, the Collins and Cheyenne. by CERCC. National Right to Work Committee’s State Sen. Bonnie Allison (R-Edgewa- vice president for state legislation. Citizens Take on ter) voted against a bill that would have Union Bosses Big Labor Czars Repressed 1991 Right to W~rkBill More than 39,000 Colorado citizens are digging in to fight the coming State- 6s6!n. Allison and Though !he union brass defeated a house battle over their Right to Work. Righhr ro Work hill (H.B. 1267) by n nar- Colorado’s union bosses, who want to ep. Johnson refus row 3 1-30 vote in the Colorado House of keep collecting forced dues from unwill- Representatives in 1991. Right to Work ing workers. are trying to brand Right to advocates are planning Stad Up fQS WQ ro renew their bat- Wark as “anti-union.” tle in the Statehouse in 1993. “What the union bosses are saying is Outlawing forced unionism as a condi- tion of employment will attract new jobs that they can only keep their jobs by forc- angry ~~~s~~~~e~~§and strengthen Colorado’s economy. ing workers to join -that workers, given During the last three years, union-boss a free choice, will abandon the union tossed them out of featherbedding and strike violence have bosses’ plantation. caused thousands of manufacturing jobs “Right to Work supporters know that to flee Colorado, even as neighboring when workers see a union truly represent- Right to Work states like Utah. Kansas ing them, they won’t hzve to be forced to Mark Mix, National and Nebraska gain jobs in this high-pay- pay tribute - they’ll gladly sign up.” Right to Work ing sector. According to a study by the said John Paulton. executive director of Committee Vice President Fanrus Corporation. a leading business Colorado Citizens for Right to Work. For State Legislation relocarion consullant. stztes without Colorado citizens who want to help Right ((1 IVorl, 1;tu \ nc‘rr auromatically conviiicr the L.egi4aturc to enact a Right elirninared by half of all companies look- to Work law should contaci Paulton at ing to expand or relocate. (303) 863-0609. 5 BY C~FFQRDJ. LEVY A simmering labor Jispute at a kosher supermarket Four workers suffered minor injurk, including a in Brooklyn turned violent yesterday when members of broken wrist, and were taken eo Caledonian Hospiial, a food workers’ union pushed past police harricades he said. inro the store and fought nonunion workers, leaving At least eight police officers broke up the dispute, four people injured, the poke and witnesses said. which ended about 2:45 P.M.,said Sgt. Mary Wrensen, The union, Local 342-50 of the United Food and a police spokeswoman. Commercial Workers, has been trying to enlist the There were no arrests. workers at the Kosher Plaza Supermarket :iince it Sergeant Wrensen said the police had regularly opened in March. assigned officers to the store to keep the picketing But many workers were not interested, according to union members away from the entrance. employees interviewed yesterday, prompting the union “We had to get them out of the store,” said Ruben to regularly picket the store at 1223 Coney Island Miranda, a 38-year-old clerk. Avenue in Flatbush. “Ie wasn’t right. Four buses drove up to the store about 1:15 1?M. and “They were harassing people. about 100 union members gutout-and began demon- “Words were-exchanged and they jumped Vinnie, ‘stracing, the police and witnesses said. the guy from produce. The store is one of the few kosher supermarkets in “1 sprayed mace co get them off Vinnie.” the New ‘fork metropolitan area and caters to the large A spokesman for the union could not he reached Orthodox Jewish population in Brooklyn. yesterday. Mike Feldman, a 28,year-old butcher at Kosher Plaza, Fight in the Store said he had rejected the union because working condi- Richard Scher, owner af Kosher Plaza, said some tions at the supermarket were excellent. union members then walked into the store and hesin “I’ve worked in many other places in my life and fighting with nonunion workers who had asked them this is the place that treats me best,” Mr. FelJman said. to leave. “I have no prohlems.” Reprint hmthe NEW YORK TIMES, Tuesday. September 8,1992

care combine to give Arkansas urban dent Bush ro change course and grant families higher real incomes to spend their full support to Right to Work. C,V~M~Jjh, p~ -1 than families in forced-unionism states Bush’s stated support for Right to right to refrain from supporting union offi- like California. Connecticut and Pennsyl- Work was undercut just a few weeks ago cials’ strikes without fear of suffering pay vania. by his Administration’s capitulation to curs. demotions or dismissal. But the record shows that Arkansas’s AFL-CIO building trades‘ bosses on the Organized Labor came within three ~ccessis not the result of any secret for- Boston Harbor cleanup project. ~otesof snuffing a Right to Work fili- mula contrived by Bill Clinton. Scorning personal pleas from Commit- buster and bulldozing the Strike bill Like Arkansas, a majority of Right to tee President Reed Larson. in July the Bush through the Senate in June - risking Work states - unlike nearly all forced- Justice Department filed 3 second brief mors strikes. devastating job losses and unionism states -- have continued to pressuring the Supreme Court to impose expand manufacturing employment dur- soaring inflation. union-only hiring discrimination in Boston ing the lingering recession. Harbor. and set a devasuting precedent for Right to Work Arkansas Arkansas’s lower taxes are typical of all other public works projects. Right to Work states. where urban fami- “If the Bush Administration prevails Beats Recession lies in iY87 paid only about half as much in this case. 2nd U.S. tax- in state and local taxes as in Big Labor- payers will get soaked as the waste and In touting Clinton’s “record in ruled states 151.1XO vs. S2.758). inefficiency that are earmarks of Arkansas.” the Clinton campaign boasts If Clinton makes good on his threat to monopoly unionism jack up !he cleanup’s that. under Clinton. Arkansas has bucked eliminate Amrrica’s Right to Work pock- costs by as much as a billion dollars.” the national economic malaise by contin- ets of prosperity. the national economy will noted Larson. uing to add new manufacturing jobs over do worse than \!agnate. I! will collapse. “Bush has also made a wries of pro- the past three years. union boss appointments to the powerful Clinton boosters also trumpet the fact Clinton, Bush Urged National Labor Relations Board.“ Larson that Arkansas’s state and local !axes as a To Change Course added. share of personal income rank fifth low- ”Only grassroots pressure from pro- est in the nation. Since last February. the National Right to Work Americans can persuade It‘s true that good jobs. lower taxes Right to Work Committee and its mem- Clinton and Bush to svmd up to the union md mort! affordable housing and health bers have prerced Gov. Clinton and Presi- elite.” he concluded. 0 6 9 is Q

A3 this month's NEWSLETTER goes io press. the union-label U.S. Congress has just emkrrled another %IOmillion in taxpayers' mone) to assist the AFL-CIO hierarchy's drive Io spread compulsory unionism around the world. Congres\ will launder this misappro- priation through [he so-called National ,Endowment for Democracy (NED). .; The NED's tas-funded global organiz- ling drive for the AFL-CIO's brass is 'focusing on building outposts to corral 'workers in rhe fledgling republics of 'Easrem Europc. ., NED President Carl Gershman. ex- ..:executive director of a socialist fringe ipan! whore leadership is dominated by !AFL-CIO union bosses. is helping AFL- CIO czars squander tax dollars to pursue . .~ .. . their international agenda with virtually j no congressional oversight. : Union-bos3 control of the NED allows ... ! the AFL-ClO union hierarchy to swallow

~ up nearly 40 percent of the NED's tax- payer funded hudgci. International Union Moguls Seek to Obliterate Forced-Unionism Foes The AFL-CIO brass on the NED board. including American Federation of Teachers union kingpin AI Shanker and Bricklayers union boss John Joyce, have vetoed the suggestion of even a single penny of NED tax money going into union movements advocating freedom of Virginia AFL-C/O top dog Datiiel E. LeBlanc (righrJis happy 10 sratid in Leniii's skd- choice for workers. ow as IIP uses US.ta.ve.7 IO coerce East European workers to join his union. ..For ).car$. thc National Alliance of Postal and Federal Employees (NAPFE). that the WCL should not exist." Custer "Commitiee members must expose the a 65.000 member union that opposes told Insiglir magazine. program as a tax-wasting, compulsory- compulsory unionism. has applied for Bulgarian. Polish and other East Euro- unionism scheme that forces every taxpay- NED grants to expand its training pro- pean trade unionists have confirmed that er to pay tribute to the union hierarchy," gram for union officials from developing the NED threatened to cut off their fund- warned Karl Gallant, the Committee's vice countries. ing if they affiliated with the pro-volun- president for federal legislation. But Shanker. Joyce and their cronies tarism WCL. "If pro-Right to Work taxpayers speak on the NED board have made cemin tax- up. they can force Congress to buck the payer dollars are funnelled only to AFL- Committee Seeks Relief union bosses and stop funding the pro- CIO-controlled unions that force workers For Abused Tapayes compulsory unionism National Endow- tojoin and pay dues. ment for Democracy." continued Gallant. Carlos Custer. the Argentine who In anticipation of a fierce battle over Gallant urged Commitree members lo heads NAPE'S parent union. the World the National Endowment for Democracy's wri!e their senators at the US. Senate, Confederation of Labor (WCL). shares 1993 appropriation. the National Right to Washington. D.C. 205 IO. the belief that trade unionists should Work Committee is launching a grass- "Or call (202) 224-3121 arid ask for "respect plurali\ni iind make the most roots campaipn to prevent Congress from your senators and congressman by effecii\e unil! in pItir;tli~m\\iIhoui \vastitif nil! iiiore I:I\ re\ etiw to I'inailcc iimw." Grtllan~stid. rhreata and hlackiii;lil." Big Labor'.. uorldwide forced-dues "Tell them tu cut off funding tor the The AFL-CIO. h

_I THE .\‘ATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK COMMITTEE’S WASHINGTON 0 C HMDQL!ARTERS IS LOCATED AT OUR NAT10NS CAPITAL AT ,YINlI RR.4DDOCK ROAD. .S(i‘lTE 500 SPRlNGflUD. I’X ‘7160 - TELEPHONE ININ)) .K<-Wi2 AECAL‘SE THEIRS HAS RECOGNIZED NRWC .AS T.4.Y ESEVPT L’.C‘DER IRCSEC. .VJllCJf4), WHICH PERMITS L’NU,~ftTEDLOBBYING. C0.t IRIHl TIO.\S ,ARE NOT TAX DEDL’CTIBLEAS CHARITABLE CO.UTHIRl’TlO.’VS -