WOMAN's. ART JOURNAL
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Press Release
Press Release April 2015 Miss Piggy to Receive Her First Award at the 2015 Sackler Center First Awards at the Brooklyn Museum on June 4 Event to Feature Miss Piggy in Conversation with Gloria Steinem Kermit the Frog to Attend Ceremony Miss Piggy, ultimate diva and star of stage and screen, who has inspired generations throughout the world, will receive her very first award at the annual Sackler Center First Awards at the Brooklyn Museum. Kermit the Frog, who has received numerous awards and accolades in his lifetime, will be in the audience to witness this great honor. The awards ceremony and reception will take place at the Brooklyn Museum on Thursday, June 4, from 5 to 7 p.m. A private reception will be followed by the award presentation to Miss Piggy by Elizabeth Sackler. Miss Piggy, who was recently called “The Gloria Steinem of the Muppet world” by the Daily Beast, will give a brief acceptance speech, followed by a 20-minute video retrospective of her career, after which she will take the stage with Ms. Steinem, who has been on hand for the Sackler Center First Awards since its 2012 launch. The Muppets Studio will be sponsoring several groups attending this special event including children and their families from Ronald McDonald House New York, a temporary home-away-from-home for families battling pediatric cancer; Brooklyn-based Girl Scout Troops 2081 and 2158; Brooklyn-based Girls for Gender Equity; and artists from Groundswell, a community mural project. The annual Sackler Center First Awards celebrates women who have broken gender barriers and made remarkable contributions in their fields. -
Alice-Neel-Biography.Pdf
ALICE NEEL Biography 1900 Born in Merion Square, Pennsylvania 1984 Died in New York, NY Education 1925 Philadelphia School of Design for Women (now Moore College of Art and Design), Philadelphia, PA Solo Exhibitions 2022 Alice Neel: Un regard engagé, Centre Georges Pompidou, Paris (catalogue) 2021 Alice Neel: People Come First, Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY 2019 Alice Neel: Freedom, David Zwirner, New York, NY (catalogue) Neel / Picasso, Sara Kay Gallery, New York, NY 2018 Alice Neel in New Jersey and Vermont, Xavier Hufkens, Brussels 2017 Alice Neel: The Great Society, Aurel Scheibler, Berlin (catalogue) Alice Neel, Uptown, David Zwirner, New York; traveled to Victoria Miro, London (catalogue) 2016 Alice Neel: Painter of Modern Life, Ateneum Art Museum, Helsinki; traveled to Gemeentemuseum, The Hague; Fondation Vincent Van Gogh, Arles; Deichtorhallen, Hamburg (catalogue) Alice Neel: The Subject and Me, Talbot Rice Gallery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK (catalogue) 2015 Alice Neel: Drawings and Watercolors 1927-1978, David Zwirner, New York, NY (catalogue) Alice Neel, Thomas Ammann Fine Art AG, Zurich [exhibition publication] Alice Neel, Xavier Hufkens, Brussels (catalogue) 2014 Alice Neel/Erastus Salisbury Field: Painting the People, Bennington Museum, Vermont Alice Neel: My Animals and Other Family, Victoria Miro, London (catalogue) 2013 Alice Neel: Intimate Relations, Drawings and Watercolours 1926-1982, Nordiska Akvarellmuseet, Skärhamn, Sweden (catalogue) People and Places: Paintings by Alice Neel, Gallery Hyundai, Seoul (catalogue) 2012 Alice Neel: Late Portraits & Still Lifes, David Zwirner, New York (catalogue) 2011 Alice Neel: Family, The Douglas Hyde Gallery, Dublin (catalogue) Alice Neel: Men Only, Victoria Miro, London (catalogue) 2010 Alice Neel: Painted Truths, The Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, Texas [itinerary: Whitechapel Gallery, London; Moderna Museet Malmö, Sweden] (catalogue) Alice Neel: Paintings, L.A. -
Alice Neel/Erastus Salisbury Field
Painting the People Alice Neel/Erastus Salisbury Field Fig. 1: Erastus Salisbury Field (1805–1900) Fig. 2: Erastus Salisbury Field (1805–1900) Julius Norton, ca. 1840 Sarah Elizabeth Ball, ca. 1838 Oil on canvas, 35 x 29 inches Oil on canvas, 35⅛ x 29¼ inches Bennington Museum, Bequest of Mrs. Harold C. Payson (Dorothy Norton) Mount Holyoke College Art Museum, South Hadley, Massachusetts Photograph by Petegorsky/Gipe by Jamie Franklin rastus Salisbury Field (1805–1900) and Alice Neel (1900–1984) were masters of the portrait within their respective periods and cultural settings. Though separated by a hundred years and working in distinct styles and contexts, the portraits painted by Field, one of America’s best known nineteenth-century itinerant artists, and Neel, one of the most acclaimed portrait painters of the twentieth century, have a remarkable resonance with one another. Alice Neel/Erastus Salisbury Field: Painting the People, an exhibition at the Bennington Museum in Vermont, examines the visual, historic and conceptual relationships between the paintings of these two seemingly disparate artists. Critics, curators, biographers, friends of the artist, and the artist herself, have referenced the relationship between “folk” or “primitive” painting and Neel’s portraits. However, this is the first exhibition to examine this facet of Neel’s work directly. By looking closely at Field’s and Neel’s political, social, and artistic milieus and the subjects depicted in their portraits, the exhibition seeks to reexamine the relationship between modernism and its romantic notions of the “folk,” while providing us with a more nuanced understanding of these important artists and their work. -
THE MARY H. DANA WOMEN ARTISTS SERIES: from Idea to Institution
4 THE JOURNAL OF THE THE MARY H. DANA WOMEN ARTISTS SERIES: From Idea to Institution BY BERYL K. SMITH Ms. Smith is Librarian at the Rutgers University Art Library During the 1960s, women began to identify and admit that social, political, and cultural inequities existed, and to seek redress. In 1966, a structural solidarity took shape with the founding of NOW (National Organization for Women). Women artists, sympathetic to the aims of this movement, recog- nized the need for a coalition with a more specific direction, and, at the height of the women's movement, several groups were formed that uniquely focused on issues of concern to women artists. In 1969 W.A.R. (Women Artists in Revolution) grew out of the Art Worker's Coalition, an anti- establishment group. In 1970 the Ad Hoc Women Artists Committee was formed, initially to increase the representation of women in the Whitney Museum annuals but later a more broad-based purpose of political and legal action and a program of regular discussions was adopted. Across the country, women artists were organizing in consciousness-raising sessions, joining hands in support groups, and picketing and protesting for the relief of injustices that they felt were rampant in the male-dominated art world. In January 1971, Linda Nochlin answered the question she posed in her now famous and widely cited article, "Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?" Nochlin maintained that the exclusion of women from social and cultural institutions was the root cause that created a kind of cultural malnourishment of women.1 In June 1971, a new unity led the Los Angeles Council of Women Artists to threaten to sue the Los Angeles County Museum for discrimination.2 That same year, at Cal Arts (California In- stitute of the Arts) Judy Chicago and Miriam Schapiro developed the first women's art program in the nation.3 These bicoastal activities illustrate merely the high points of the women's art movement, forming an historical framework and providing the emotional climate for the beginning of the Women Artists Series at Douglass College. -
“My Personal Is Not Political?” a Dialogue on Art, Feminism and Pedagogy
Liminalities: A Journal of Performance Studies Vol. 5, No. 2, July 2009 “My Personal Is Not Political?” A Dialogue on Art, Feminism and Pedagogy Irina Aristarkhova and Faith Wilding This is a dialogue between two scholars who discuss art, feminism, and pedagogy. While Irina Aristarkhova proposes “active distancing” and “strategic withdrawal of personal politics” as two performative strategies to deal with various stereotypes of women's art among students, Faith Wilding responds with an overview of art school’s curricular within a wider context of Feminist Art Movement and the radical questioning of art and pedagogy that the movement represents Using a concrete situation of teaching a women’s art class within an art school environment, this dialogue between Faith Wilding and Irina Aristakhova analyzes the challenges that such teaching represents within a wider cultural and historical context of women, art, and feminist performance pedagogy. Faith Wilding has been a prominent figure in the feminist art movement from the early 1970s, as a member of the California Arts Institute’s Feminist Art Program, Womanhouse, and in the recent decade, a member of the SubRosa, a cyberfeminist art collective. Irina Aristarkhova, is coming from a different history to this conversation: generationally, politically and theoretically, she faces her position as being an outsider to these mostly North American and, to a lesser extent, Western European developments. The authors see their on-going dialogue of different experiences and ideas within feminism(s) as an opportunity to share strategies and knowledges towards a common goal of sustaining heterogeneity in a pedagogical setting. First, this conversation focuses on the performance of feminist pedagogy in relation to women’s art. -
Rosalyn Drexler at Mitchell Algus Ans Nicholas Davies
bringing hard-edged , often ro lent imagery from film noir alll tabloid culture into the Poi arena. Known also as a plat wright and novelist , Drexler r her youth enjoyed a brief stintas , a professional wrestler. Ths dual -ven ue selection of bol '60s work and recent painting! and collages more than proves the lasting appeal of her literale comic sensibility. Sex and violence are he intertwined themes. Se/f-Port,a, (1963) presents a skimpily cloo Sylvia Sleigh: Detail of Invitation to a Voyage, 1979-99, oil on canvas , 14 panels, 8 by 70 feet overall; at Deven Golden. prone woman against a rel background with her high heel. in the air and her face obscurocf Gardner is good with planes, import, over the years , of her Arsenal , a castlelike fortress by a pillow . The large-seal! O both when delineated as in self-portraits as Venus as well built on an island in the early image s in what is perhap. Untitled (Bhoadie, Nick, S, Matt as the idealized male nudes of 20th century by eccentr ic & Tim playing basketball, The Turkish Bath (1973), art crit Scottish-American millionaire Victoria) or when intimated as in ics all, including her husband, Frank Bannerman to house part Untitled (S pissing). The latter the late Lawrence Alloway. of his military-surplus business. was one of the best pieces in Perh aps the practice harks Sleigh first glimpsed the place the exhibition. The urine spot on back to Sleigh 's charmed from the window of an Amtrak the ground is delicately evoked, girlhood in Wales; perhaps train, and on a mild spring day as is the stream of urine, which it ha s something to do with a some time later she organized a has the prec ision of a Persian European tendency to allegory riverbank picnic to take advan miniature. -
Drawing Upon Themselves: Women's Self-Portraits in A
DRAWING UPON THEMSELVES: WOMEN'S SELF-PORTRAITS IN A MAN'S WORLD Submitted by Monica Ann Mersch Department of Art In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Fine Arts Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Spring 1996 CLEARANCE FOR ART HISTORY RESEARCH PAPER FOR M.F.A. CANDIDATES This paper must be completed and filed before the final examination of the candidate. This clearance sheet must be filled out and filed in the candidate's record. I have completed and filed the original term paper in art history in the Art Department office and I have given a copy to the course instructor. Course Number Year 0/tf I Yl~t1--~ Student signature Instructor signature ~a.~Adviser signature 1 Drawing Upon Themselves: Women's Self-Portraits in a Man's World A man can do well depending only upon himself and can brave public opinion; but a woman who has done well has only accomplished half her task; for what others think of her counts no less than what she in fact is (Radisch 441 ). As long as people who call themselves artists have depicted others, they have also created images of themselves. As far back as Hildegaard von Bingen in the twelfth century, and probably before, almost every artist or artisan who has picked up a pen, a brush, or a chisel has been concerned with the depiction of self. Male artists have had the ability to present themselves as they are, as subject and artist, without a division between the two. Women artists have historically traveled a slightly different, and considerably rougher path than their male counterparts. -
Women, Art, and Power After Linda Nochlin
Women, Art, and Power After Linda Nochlin Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/octo/article-pdf/doi/10.1162/OCTO_a_00320/1754182/octo_a_00320.pdf by guest on 28 September 2021 MIGNON NIXON In November 2001, thirty years after Linda Nochlin wrote “Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?,” Carol Armstrong, then director of the Program in the Study of Women and Gender at Princeton, convened a conference, “Women Artists at the Millennium,” to consider the galvanizing effects of the essay on art and art history. Armstrong emphasized that the event’s focus would be “the contemporary situation.” 1 For those two days, we would think with Nochlin about what had changed after 1971—after the essay, after the women’s liberation movement, after the emer - gence of a feminist discourse in art and art history—and about how that discourse continued to evolve as feminism, in all its critical articulations, reimagined the ques - tions art and art history might pose. “At its strongest,” Nochlin declared, “a feminist art history is a transgressive and anti-establishment practice meant to call many of the major precepts of the discipline into question.” 2 But as it turned out, those gathered in Princeton that November weekend were also compelled to think with Nochlin about what was to come after the attacks of 9/11, after the invasion of Afghanistan, and after a political regression to delusions of mastery and supremacy that threatened to undo three decades of collective work on “women, art, and power.” A shadow “hung over us so immediately that the triumphalism that seemed to hover around the notion of ‘women artists at the millennium’ was converted into its epically anxious opposite,” Armstrong recalled. -
The Museum of Modern Art: the Mainstream Assimilating New Art
AWAY FROM THE MAINSTREAM: THREE ALTERNATIVE SPACES IN NEW YORK AND THE EXPANSION OF ART IN THE 1970s By IM SUE LEE A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2013 1 © 2013 Im Sue Lee 2 To mom 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am deeply grateful to my committee, Joyce Tsai, Melissa Hyde, Guolong Lai, and Phillip Wegner, for their constant, generous, and inspiring support. Joyce Tsai encouraged me to keep working on my dissertation project and guided me in the right direction. Mellissa Hyde and Guolong Lai gave me administrative support as well as intellectual guidance throughout the coursework and the research phase. Phillip Wegner inspired me with his deep understanding of critical theories. I also want to thank Alexander Alberro and Shepherd Steiner, who gave their precious advice when this project began. My thanks also go to Maureen Turim for her inspiring advice and intellectual stimuli. Thanks are also due to the librarians and archivists of art resources I consulted for this project: Jennifer Tobias at the Museum Library of MoMA, Michelle Harvey at the Museum Archive of MoMA, Marisa Bourgoin at Smithsonian Institution’s Archives of American Art, Elizabeth Hirsch at Artists Space, John Migliore at The Kitchen, Holly Stanton at Electronic Arts Intermix, and Amie Scally and Sean Keenan at White Columns. They helped me to access the resources and to publish the archival materials in my dissertation. I also wish to thank Lucy Lippard for her response to my questions. -
Double Vision: Woman As Image and Imagemaker
double vision WOMAN AS IMAGE AND IMAGEMAKER Everywhere in the modern world there is neglect, the need to be recognized, which is not satisfied. Art is a way of recognizing oneself, which is why it will always be modern. -------------- Louise Bourgeois HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES The Davis Gallery at Houghton House Sarai Sherman (American, 1922-) Pas de Deux Electrique, 1950-55 Oil on canvas Double Vision: Women’s Studies directly through the classes of its Woman as Image and Imagemaker art history faculty members. In honor of the fortieth anniversary of Women’s The Collection of Hobart and William Smith Colleges Studies at Hobart and William Smith Colleges, contains many works by women artists, only a few this exhibition shows a selection of artworks by of which are included in this exhibition. The earliest women depicting women from The Collections of the work in our collection by a woman is an 1896 Colleges. The selection of works played off the title etching, You Bleed from Many Wounds, O People, Double Vision: the vision of the women artists and the by Käthe Kollwitz (a gift of Elena Ciletti, Professor of vision of the women they depicted. This conjunction Art History). The latest work in the collection as of this of women artists and depicted women continues date is a 2012 woodcut, Glacial Moment, by Karen through the subtitle: woman as image (woman Kunc (a presentation of the Rochester Print Club). depicted as subject) and woman as imagemaker And we must also remember that often “anonymous (woman as artist). Ranging from a work by Mary was a woman.” Cassatt from the early twentieth century to one by Kara Walker from the early twenty-first century, we I want to take this opportunity to dedicate this see depictions of mothers and children, mythological exhibition and its catalog to the many women and figures, political criticism, abstract figures, and men who have fostered art and feminism for over portraits, ranging in styles from Impressionism to forty years at Hobart and William Smith Colleges New Realism and beyond. -
"Women's Work: Homage to Feminist Art" Curated by Cindy Nemser
Contact Audrey Frank Anastasi 917. 880-8337 (not for publication) [email protected] Cindy Nemser 718. 857-9456 (not for publication) [email protected] TABLA RASA GALLERY and THE FEMINIST ART JOURNAL present "Women's Work: Homage to Feminist Art" curated by Cindy Nemser March 28 - May 13, 2007 Artists Reception: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 5:30 - 8:00 PM Gallery hours: THURSDAY, FRIDAY & SATURDAY Noon - 5:00 pm Other weekdays: by appointment 718. 833-9100, 718. 768-0305 [email protected] http://www.tablarasagallery.com/ Renowned pioneer of the Feminist movement, art historian and critic Cindy Nemser returns to the world of contemporary art to curate an all women's exhibition entitled “Women’s Work: Homage to Feminist Art” at Tabla Rasa Gallery, 224 48th Street, Brooklyn, opening on March 28, 2007. The exhibition features great women artists who emerged in the 70’s, some of whom have obtained the widespread appreciation they richly deserve and others who still haven’t achieved full recognition. Some of the famous artists in the exhibition are Eleanor Antin, Hannah Wilke, Lila Katzen, Audrey Flack, Howardena Pindell, Nancy Grossman and Deborah Remington. Others who are now beginning to get their due are Dotty Attie, Sylvia Sleigh, Mary Grigoriadis, Judith Bernstein, and the legendary performance artist/writer Lil Picard. To give the exhibit a richer overlay of meaning, and in homage to these giants of feminist art, Nemser has selected additional contemporary women, such as, Orly Cogan, Irene Hardwicke Oliveri, Audrey Anastasi and Bec Stupak, among others, to create a visual dialog between the older women artists of the feminist second wave and the younger women of the emerging third wave. -
A Finding Aid to the Woman's Building Records, 1970-1992, in the Archives of American Art
A Finding Aid to the Woman's Building Records, 1970-1992, in the Archives of American Art Diana L. Shenk and Rihoko Ueno Funding for the processing of this collection was provided by the Getty Foundation. Funding for the digitization of this collection was provided by The Walton Family Foundation and Joyce F. Menschel, Vital Projects Fund, Inc. August 2007 Archives of American Art 750 9th Street, NW Victor Building, Suite 2200 Washington, D.C. 20001 https://www.aaa.si.edu/services/questions https://www.aaa.si.edu/ Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Historical Note.................................................................................................................. 2 Scope and Content Note................................................................................................. 3 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 3 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 4 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 5 Series 1: Administrative Files, circa 1970-1991....................................................... 5 Series 2: Education Programs,