DOCSLIB.ORG

Aloha-Reedville Existing Conditions Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aloha-Reedville Existing Conditions Report Aloha-Reedville Study & Livable Community Plan Existing Conditions Report June 2012 Appendix 10 This project also is funded in part through a Community Challenge Grant provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation / Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. This material is based upon work supported by the FHWA under TDGII-P-35/Cooperative Agreement No. DTFH61-11-H-00011. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the Author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the FHWA. The work that provided the basis for this publication was supported by funding under an award with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The substance and findings of the work are dedicated to the public. The author and publisher are solely responsible for the accuracy of the statements and interpretations contained in this publication. Such interpretations do not necessarily reflect the views of the Government. The Aloha-Reedville Study and Livable Community Plan is funded in part through a Construction Excise Tax (CET) grant from Metro. Aloha-Reedville Study and Livable Community Plan Appendix 10 Report: Public Involvement June 11, 2012 Page 1 of 1 10 Public Involvement Appendix The Public Involvement Appendix provides background and detailed information on the outreach plan, and community input received through a variety of activities. The appendix includes the: 1. Public Engagement and Communications Plan for Phase 1 2. Statistically Valid Random Sample Survey reports (the first of two to be conducted in the process): Baseline Report, Cross-Tabulated Report, and Verbatim Response Report 3. Stakeholder Interviews 4. Phase 1 Interim Public Involvement and Input Summary #2 (March – November, 20111) 5. Tualatin Valley Highway Corridor Plan Public Input Summary (November, 2011) 6. Summary of Public Engagement Best Practices Roundtable Discussions Public involvement efforts are guided by the Public Engagement and Communications Plan. The Public Engagement and Communications Plan is scheduled for annual revisions to incorporate improved ways to get the community involved and to jettison those approaches that are not meeting expectations. Several early public involvement efforts have already contributed to building a foundation of understanding about the community. Future engagement efforts will build upon this foundation. Two surveys (Statistically Valid Random Sample Surveys) will be conducted over the course of the What Is That Term? project. The baseline survey was completed in Statistically Valid Random September, 2011 representing the views of 394 Sample Surveys community members. A follow-up survey will be conducted in late 2013 to assess changes in These types of surveys are generally community viewpoints. used to predict the responses of a population (within a given error range) Stakeholder interviews were conducted to gain based upon a random sample of that knowledge from long-time residents, business population. owners, and property owners about the study area. In this case those responding to the The interviews also sought to identify other Aloha-Reedville survey represented community members who should be involved in the approximately the same percentages as process. the demographic groups in the Aloha Census data. The Phase 1 Interim summary will continually be built upon throughout the process and each Industry standards are a survey of 200 substantial addition will be re-assessed and a new for a population over 2,000. summary provided. This current summary captures input from about 600 comments. Two roundtable discussions were convened by the county to identify best practices in engaging historically under-represented communities. The discussions included representatives from county and regional organizations and agencies that have demonstrated success in reaching these community members. A summary highlights those best practice efforts. 1 This report builds upon Phase 1 Interim Summary #1 March – August, 2011 http://www.co.washington.or.us/LUT/PlanningProjects/alohareedville/index.cfm Aloha-Reedville Study and Livable Community Plan SUMMARY OF STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS October 21, 2011 JLA Public Involvement Aloha-Reedville Study & Livable Community Plan Community Interviews Summary November 18, 2011 Page 2 CONTENTS Introduction 3 Overview 3 Interview Format 3 Interview Findings 4 Consensus Themes 4 1. Infrastructure 4 2. Community Identity 5 3. Economic Development 6 4. Affordable Housing 9 5. Growth and Changing Population 10 6. Crime and Safety 10 7. Leadership 11 8. Area Planning and Zoning History 12 Suggestions for Community Engagement 13 Appendix A: Stakeholder Interview List 14 Appendix B: Interview Questions 15 www.co.washington.or.us/alohareedville Stakeholder Interview Summary Aloha-Reedville Study & Livable Community Plan Community Interviews Summary November 18, 2011 Page 3 INTRODUCTION The Aloha-Reedville Study and Livable Community Plan is a three-year effort to identify ways to enhance community livability and impact the future growth in the area. The study will identify transportation improvements and possible zoning changes that could support job growth, business development, increase affordable housing options, and provide more access to public transit and more options for biking and walking. Identifying these options along with community aspirations will play a vital role in discussions about where the community wants to go and how those outcomes could be achieved. Although this study is primarily a transportation, affordable housing and economic analysis, the study may serve as a catalyst for future planning efforts and discussion amongst service providers to the study area. Overview Between September and October, Eryn Deeming Kehe of JLA Public Involvement and Dena Marshall of Marshall Mediation (a sub-contractor to JLA) conducted 12 interviews with individuals who represent a range of local and regional interest groups, neighborhood associations, property owners and community facilities. The purpose of the interviews was to understand stakeholders’ perspectives and gather their input in order to learn about the project area and inform future outreach efforts. In addition to gathering information from key stakeholders, the interviews were intended to introduce and/or update them about the Aloha-Reedville Study and Livable Community Plan project. Interview Format Interviews were casual and conversational in format. Specific questions are contained in Attachment B. Questions ranged from stakeholders’ desired project outcomes and anticipated challenges, to their thoughts on the best ways to engage community members. www.co.washington.or.us/alohareedville Stakeholder Interview Summary Aloha-Reedville Study & Livable Community Plan Community Interviews Summary November 18, 2011 Page 4 INTERVIEW FINDINGS All interviewees were asked a series of questions according to their role in the community (see Appendix B: Interview Questions). The comments have been organized by topic and paraphrased to capture the main perceptions of the speaker. Comments are not attributed to any one person. Themes When asked about the community’s needs, a high level of agreement and interest was identified on the following topics: 1) Infrastructure The majority of interviewees describe Tualatin Valley Highway (TV Highway), a thoroughfare between Hillsboro and Beaverton, to be overly congested and in need of repairs, additional sidewalks and safe pedestrian crosswalks. In addition, there was general agreement that a successful plan will incorporate improvements to transportation infrastructure and public transit in Aloha-Reedville. The following list is a sample of infrastructure comments received in three categories: existing conditions, rail and freight, and areas of opportunity. These are direct comments from individuals and represent a sample of comments received. They do not necessarily represent the feeling of a majority of those interviewed. Existing Conditions a. Roads Roads in the area, including TV highway, are congested and in need of repairs. Some community members believe that TV Highway is unsafe because it is over capacity. The 1980s community plan did not result in needed infrastructure investments for all transportation modes, specifically, the Westside Bypass freeway that was planned. There are not enough crosswalks, traffic lights, or street lights on TV Highway and other major streets to make for safe crossing. People want to see more sidewalks on major streets. People do want to see bike lanes – believing that people will start to bike more often if they feel safe on the streets. Aloha-Reedville does not need a $2 million study. Funding should be spent on fixing existing infrastructure (roads, ditches, paving), as the private sector will respond. www.co.washington.or.us/alohareedville Stakeholder Interview Summary Aloha-Reedville Study & Livable Community Plan Community Interviews Summary November 18, 2011 Page 5 TV Highway has declined over the years; however Baseline seems to be holding its own. TV Highway has high volume of automobile traffic, proving bus lines in the area valuable. b. Rail and Freight The railroad is a big challenge. It’s hard to get to businesses on the other side of TV Highway. Infrastructure Areas of Opportunity The heart of the planning process must link back to the transportation plan. Construct safe passageways: more sidewalks, crosswalks, and street lights.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Existing Conditions
    Hillsboro Transportation System Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 Contents 3.1 Hillsboro Context.............................................................................................................. 3 3.2 Current Trends ................................................................................................................. 6 Increasing Population and Land Area .......................................................................................... 6 Increased Ethnic and Racial Diversity .......................................................................................... 8 Increasing Employment and Housing ........................................................................................ 11 Commute Patterns ..................................................................................................................... 15 3.3 Roadways 20 Number of Lanes ........................................................................................................................ 23 Speed Zones ............................................................................................................................... 23 Creek and Rail Crossings ............................................................................................................ 24 Average Daily Traffic .................................................................................................................. 29 Signalized Intersections ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Mobility Policy Update Examples of Current Approaches | Overview Oregonmetro.Gov/Mobility
    Regional Mobility Policy Update Examples of Current Approaches | Overview oregonmetro.gov/mobility April 2021 This overview and the factsheets OC NOTGNIHSAW OOC OC HAMONTLUM OOC C Introduction C N that follow summarize current H O in BBlvl A Pla vd Metro and the Oregon T urth P M o G E¡¢ £F C¤¥¥ A¥¦¢ practices related to how the R NNEE Four O N I Department of Transportation N mobility policy in the RTP and H T L S U (ODOT) are working together A M the OHP are used in different M W d R N Marine Dr s to update the policy on s s s a planning applications and a P P s us P u N how mobility is defined and N VancouverVancouver i li identify opportunities for l W C e S o n t l measured in the Portland area r H u improvement in an updated o e m C C le b n ia U s B in the Regional Transportation W llv e C L A R K C O R v NNEE M N v ariinen D L ARK policy. The factsheets were d d e Dr A MUMULTNOMAH C CO O r LTNOMAH Plan (RTP), local transportation e v Camas d developed through document n d v v C e e l N l O B B D L D system plans (TSPs), and when oombm r b r review and interviews conducted aar J N rd N WWashougalashougal St g In I nng J evaluating the traffic impacts n i te with agency staff on 12 examples t K N e E r r ve r NNEE KKilliilling swo e s s rthth Airp t t 3 o h of local comprehensive plan A S rt d a NW Yeon Ave t t WWaa NE Ma r R of recent system plans, plan R y rinnee DD t u e e NE Sandy Blvd Y L s s eon Sandy s A n Luther K amendments.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Transportation Baseline Report
    Transportation Baseline Report Oak Street Refinement Plan Forest Grove, Oregon DRAFT August 2020 Draft Transportation Baseline Report Project Information Project: Oak Street Refinement Plan Prepared for: 3J Consulting 9600 SW Nimbus Avenue, Suite 100 Beaverton, Oregon 97008 Reviewing Agency Jurisdiction : Forest Grove 1924 Council Street Forest Grove, Oregon 97116 Project Representative Prepared by : SCJ Alliance 8730 Tallon Lane NE, Suite 200 Lacey, WA 98516 360.352.1465 scjalliance.com Contact : Anne Sylvester, PTE [email protected] (360) 352-1465 Project Reference: SCJ 1902 .01 Path: N:\Projects\1902 3J Consulting, Inc\1902.01 Forest Grove Oak Street Area Land Use Refinement\04-Dels\01-Baseline\Transp\2020-0808 Draft Oak Street Area Transp Baseline.docx Oak Street Refinement Plan Draft Transportation Baseline Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ........................................................................ 1-1 2. REVIEWED DOCUMENTS AND PLANS ....................................................................... 2-1 2.1 State Documents and Plans ................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Regional Documents and Plans .......................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Forest Grove Documents and Plans ................................................................................... 2-2 2.4 Washington County Documents and Plans .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Date: January 27, 2021 To: Board of Directors From: Doug
    Date: January 27, 2021 To: Board of Directors From: Doug Kelsey Subject: ORDINANCE NO. 362 OF THE TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON (TRIMET) RETROACTIVELY ADOPTING APRIL 2020 AND AUGUST 2020 SERVICE CHANGES AND UPDATING ROUTE DESIGNATIONS (FIRST READING AND PUBLIC HEARING) 1. Purpose of Ite m Ordinance 362 requests that the TriMet Board of Directors (Board) retroactively adopt service changes and revise route designations now described in TriMet Code Chapter 22, Section 22.05. 2. Type of Agenda Item Initial Contract Contract Modification Other: Ordinance 3. Reason for Board Action The Board may adopt service changes and revise TriMet Code route designations only by adoption of an Ordinance. 4. Type of Action Resolution Ordinance 1st Reading and Public Hearing Ordinance 2nd Reading 5. Background In response to dramatic losses in ridership and adoption of health precautions due to the COVID-19 pandemic, TriMet implemented urgent service changes on April 5, 2020 and August 31, 2020. The first set of service changes were put in place on April 5, 2020 in response to a precipitous fall in ridership due to the outbreak of the pandemic. TriMet staff quickly developed a service reduction plan intended to protect transit service levels provided to low-income and minority communities, hospitals, and major job centers with a high percentage of low-wage jobs. The April 5, 2020 service reduction plan included: • No change in weekday service levels for 24 of 85 bus lines (28% of all lines) • Weekday service adjustments to 61 of 85 bus lines (72% of all lines) • Bus lines receiving weekday service adjustments transitioned from weekday service to Saturday service; lines without Saturday service had their weekday service modified to a lower level; span of service (later or earlier) was adjusted to accommodate demand • Bus lines with weekend service were adjusted to Sunday service for the entire weekend • Weekday MAX service was adjusted to operate every 15 min.
    [Show full text]
  • 2795 Se Tv Highway Prime Owner/User Retail Property with Income in Densely Populated Area of Portland Msa
    YOUR BUSINESS HERE 2795 SE TV HIGHWAY PRIME OWNER/USER RETAIL PROPERTY WITH INCOME IN DENSELY POPULATED AREA OF PORTLAND MSA ASHTON SUMMERS BRAD MACOMBER ASSOCIATE SENIOR ADVISOR 503.218.4380 503.218.4380 [email protected] [email protected] OR 201228656 | WA 140840 OR 200908061 | WA 95748 commercialintegritynw.com LEGAL DISCLAIMER The information contained in this marketing brochure is proprietary and strictly confidential. It is intended to be reviewed only by the party receivingYOUR it from Commercial BUSINESS Integrity, NW HEREand should not be made available to any other persons or entities without written consent of Commercial Integrity, NW. The information contained herein has been prepared to provide summary, unverified financial and physical information to prospective purchasers to establish a preliminary level of interest in the Subject Property. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN SHALL NOT BE A SUBSTITUTE FOR A THOROUGH DUE DILIGENCE INVESTIGATION. Commercial Integrity, NW has not made any investigation, and makes no warranty or representation with respect to the income or expense for the Subject Property, the future projected financial performance of the Subject Property, the size or square footage and improvements, the presence or absence of contaminating substances, PCBs or asbestos, the compliance with local, state and federal regulations, the physical condition of the improvements thereon, or financial condition or business prospects of any tenant, or any tenant’s plan or intentions to continue to occupy the Subject Property. The information contained herein has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable; however, Commercial Integrity, NW has not verified and will not verify, any of the information contained herein, nor has Commercial Integrity, NW conducted any investigation regarding these matters and makes no warranty or representation whatsoever regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington County LIT Meeting 4: Tualatin Valley Highway Meeting: Metro Local Investment Team, Washington County Date/Time: August 19Th, 2019
    Washington County LIT Meeting 4 (TV Highway) Washington County LIT Meeting 4: Tualatin Valley Highway Meeting: Metro Local Investment Team, Washington County Date/time: August 19th, 2019. 6:30 pm to 9 pm Place: Beaverton City Hall Council Chambers, 12725 SW Millikan Way, Beaverton, OR Purpose: Tour Tualatin Valley Highway, review project concepts and gather LIT member feedback. Attendance LIT Members Eman Abbas Sarah Beachy Tom Hughes Nina Kung Felicita Monteblanco Sushmita Poddar Piyawee Ruenjinda Jerome Sibayan Staff Anthony Buczek, Metro Tyler Frisbee, Metro Victor Sin, Metro Camilla Dartnell, Kittelson & Associates, Inc Allison Brown, JLA Public Involvement Travis Rumohr, JLA Public Involvement General Public Marah Danielson, ODOT Chris Deffebach, Washington County Craig Dirksen, Metro Savannah Edson, Matt Freitag, Oregon Department of Transportation Luis Hernandez, Cornelius Inna Levin, Metro/Task Force Ahne Oosterhof Stephen Robert, Washington County Gregory Robertson, Washington County Walter Robinson II, Getting There Together Charri Schairer, Tualatin Hills Parks and Recreation District Dick Schouten, Washington County Board of Commissioners Jean Senechal Biggs, City of Beaverton Anna Slatinsky, City of Beaverton 1 Washington County LIT Meeting 4 (TV Highway) Jamie Snook, TriMet Pete Truax, City of Forest Grove Jessica Vega Pederson, Multnomah County/T2020 Erin Wardell, Washington County Summary of Discussion Members were primarily concerned about safety issues along the corridor and access for those that work and live along the corridor. There was also concern that such a long corridor, with so many issues, might be too expensive to address in a complete way, and that consideration would have to be given to priority projects. Other issues, such as equitable access and problems with projected growth were brought up, but the primary focus was on safety issues and transit access.
    [Show full text]
  • Farm Fresh 2017 Denfeld Orchards
    2018 Farm Fresh 2017 Denfeld Orchards Savor -the- Harvest 1 TUALITY HEALTHCARE THIS IS THE TUALATIN VALLEY The Tualatin Valley is a destination fi lled with surprises at every corner. Explore the cities and towns that make up the Tualatin Valley and discover the more than 30 wineries, a dozen breweries, hundreds of miles of hiking and cycling trails and nature parks. Learn more at tualatinvalley.org. Your produce is local. Shouldn’t your health care be too? Where you get your care matters—for your health and for Hillsboro. For 100 years we’ve been finding new ways to keep our community healthy. Now, our partnership with OHSU is bringing the expertise of Oregon’s only academic medical center right here. Together, our deep commitment to Oregonians is making a difference in the care we offer: • Total joint care and five OHSU orthopedic The Tualatin Valley includes the cities of Banks, Beaverton, Cornelius, Durham, surgeons on staff. Forest Grove, Gaston, Hillsboro, King City, North Plains, Sherwood, Tigard, • Baby-Friendly® birth facility and OHSU Tualatin and Wilsonville, and the villages of Aloha, Gales Creek, Helvetia and Scholls. specialists for high risk pregnancies. • Award-winning stroke care and OHSU neurosurgery on site. tualatinvalley.org 1.800.537.3149 VISIT US AT: WWW.TUALITY.ORG INFORMATION: 503-681-1111 2 Explore Hillsboro | www.explorehillsboro.com Savor -the- Harvest 3 2018 MAKING THE MOST OF YOUR HILLSBORO EXPERIENCE Farmers’ markets. Top-notch restaurants. World-class out Magnolia Park in the Tanasbourne neighborhood for 03 From the Mayor wineries, microbreweries, and coffee houses. Hillsboro and an outstanding playground and water feature; or, head to [ ] Washington County offer an incredible diversity of flavors to Jackson Bottom Wetlands Preserve to experience 710 acres [04] City Information savor.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Sites Sites Construction Through Drive Workers ODOT — •
    Oregon residents and visitors, as well as the state’s economy. economy. state’s the as well as visitors, and residents Oregon recognize that a safe, efficient network of transportation systems is critical to to critical is systems transportation of network efficient safe, a that recognize technology to light the roads. Our goal is to keep Oregon moving, and we we and moving, Oregon keep to is goal Our roads. the light to technology use pathways in cities to leading efforts to improve Oregon’s use of solar solar of use Oregon’s improve to efforts leading to cities in pathways use We do a lot of things many people don’t realize — from creating multi- multi- creating from — realize don’t people many things of lot a do We crossings, commercial trucking and more. more. and trucking commercial crossings, highways, ODOT oversees the Department of Motor Vehicles, railroad railroad Vehicles, Motor of Department the oversees ODOT highways, official on site, if necessary. if site, on official Oregon has grown, so has ODOT’s mission. In addition to state and federal federal and state to addition In mission. ODOT’s has so grown, has Oregon Report any unsafe incidents to a flagger, police officer or other other or officer police flagger, a to incidents unsafe any Report - ODOT was first formed in 1913 as the state highway department. As As department. highway state the as 1913 in formed first was ODOT • Be alert, be visible, be patient. be visible, be alert, Be - for road work. It was one cent per gallon.
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Time Reliability on Urban Arterials Avinash Unnikrishnan, Ph.D., Sirisha Kothuri, Ph.D., Jason Anderson, Ph.D
    Exiting the Freeway: Travel Time Reliability on Urban Arterials Avinash Unnikrishnan, Ph.D., Sirisha Kothuri, Ph.D., Jason Anderson, Ph.D. Researchers from Portland State University (PSU) part- COMPARING THREE MAJOR ARTERIALS IN nered with Washington County, Oregon to offer da- WASHINGTON COUNTY, OR ta-driven strategies in prioritizing funding for travel time reliability improvements on their urban arterials. The vast Using Bluetooth data collected in 2017, the team com- majority of existing research on travel time reliability has pared travel time reliability for three major arterials in the focused exclusively on freeways. Funded by the National Portland, Oregon area: Institute for Transportation and Communities, PSU re- searchers Avinash Unnikrishnan, Sirisha Kothuri and Jason • OR 99W C. Anderson leveraged Bluetooth sensors provided and • Tualatin-Sherwood Road deployed by Bluemac Analytics to identify problem areas • Tualatin Valley Highway in the county. The researchers determined that Tualatin-Sherwood Road Set up at intersections throughout Washington County, has the lowest travel time reliability of the three corri- the sensors are able to calculate travel time from one in- dors. They also found that the westbound directions of tersection to another by matching Bluetooth signals from Tualatin Valley Highway and Tualatin-Sherwood Road devices in people’s cars. The researchers evaluated the have slightly higher reliability compared to their west- Bluetooth travel time data to understand the temporal bound directions. Of the selected corridors, OR 99W has variation in travel time reliability metrics on these urban the highest reliability, where the northbound is slightly arterials, including factors related to time of day, weath- more reliable than the southbound direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Staff Report: November 28, 2018 SR-2 West End District Mixed Use Development ZONING/VICINITY/AERIAL MAP
    APPLICANT’S Pacific Community Design, Inc. REPRESENTATIVE: Stacy Connery 12564 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 PROPERTY Sisters of St. Mary OWNER: 4440 SW 148th Avenue Beaverton, OR 97007 RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL of DR2018-0149 / LD2018-0034 / LD2018-0035 / LO2018-0006 / SDM2018-0010 West End District Mixed Use Development, subject to conditions identified at the end of this report. Staff Report: November 28, 2018 SR-2 West End District Mixed Use Development ZONING/VICINITY/AERIAL MAP Staff Report: November 28, 2018 SR-3 West End District Mixed Use Development BACKGROUND FACTS Key Application Dates Deemed Application Submittal Date 120-Day 365-Day** Complete* DR2018-0149 Oct. 17, 2018 Oct. 17, 2018 February 14, 2019 Oct. 17, 2019 LD2018-0034 Oct. 17, 2018 Oct. 17, 2018 February 14, 2019 Oct. 17, 2019 LD2018-0035 Oct. 17, 2018 Oct. 17, 2018 February 14, 2019 Oct. 17, 2019 LO2018-0006 Oct. 17, 2018 Oct. 17, 2018 February 14, 2019 Oct. 17, 2019 SDM2018-0010 Oct. 17, 2018 Oct. 17, 2018 February 14, 2019 Oct. 17, 2019 * Applicant requested the applications be accepted as complete upon submittal. ** Pursuant to Section 50.25.9 of the Development Code this is the latest date, with a continuance, by which a final written decision on the proposal can be made. Existing Conditions Table Zoning General Commercial (GC) Current Existing uses on site are commercial uses such as: retail, eating and Development drinking establishments, recreational facilities, and a fuel station. Site Size & The site is located on the northwest corner of TV Highway and SW Murray Location Boulevard, and is approximately 13 acres in size.
    [Show full text]
  • Fair Board Launches Calendar Battle Same July Weekend Earlier Grounds
    Bringing you the news Hillsboro Tribune marks fi rst year of publication — See Page A6 FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2013 • THE HILLSBORO LEADER IN NEWS • WWW.HILLSBOROTRIBUNE.COM • VOL. 02, NO. 31 • FREE Fair board launches calendar battle same July weekend earlier grounds. tioned Hillsboro resident Car- Resolution asks air this year brought howls of The sched- rie Abernathey. “Not a smart “We have never listed the fair weekend as one of our protest from some quarters. uling conflict move.” show organizers to Given that the two events offered the po- Although no significant preferred dates. Unfortunately, however, our avoid confl ict were literally across the street tential for con- troubles were reported during requested dates do not always work for the military from each other, the timing gestion and the competing schedules this jet team schedules.” By DOUG BURKHARDT was widely questioned. The confusion, and year, the Washington County The Hillsboro Tribune county fair brings in approxi- some citizens Fair Board made it clear it — Judy Willey, president, Oregon International Air Show mately 100,000 people each were irate. does not want to tempt fate for Having the Washington year, while the air show at- WILLEY “Who made a second time in 2014. On Sept. County Fair and the Oregon tracts about 60,000 to the Hills- the decision to 4, members unanimously ap- the OIAS avoid scheduling the “The Washington County International Air Show boro Airport — right across double-sched- proved a resolution formally air show during the last week (OIAS) scheduled for the Cornell Road from the fair- ule such big events?” ques- requesting that, in the future, of July.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Element
    CHAPTER SIX: TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 6.1 BACKGROUND Like many communities across the nation, Beaverton's development pattern evolved as a result of several economic and geographic circumstances that established the transportation framework of the City. The historic presence of a large beaver marsh in what is now central Beaverton, the advent of the railroad, and the community's early history as a commercial center of farming and logging activities all influenced its early settlement. The City’s location within the Tualatin Valley and its proximity to Willamette River commerce in Portland destined Beaverton to become a regional transportation hub. As the City grew, so did the demand for roads. The road systems of the various subareas reflect the transportation philosophies and attitudes during the times they were built. The central downtown area was the first to be officially platted and is characterized by the traditional grid pattern of streets. After the original traditional grid was established, subsequent street creation and extension patterns varied greatly as incremental development demanded. East Beaverton residential areas, such as Royal Woodlands, developed with a series of long local streets. In contrast, south Beaverton developed at a time when residents wanted to be protected from through traffic. The result was a maze of short, circuitous, dead-end streets that fulfilled this goal but overburdened the few connecting local streets and adjacent collector and arterial streets with high residential traffic volumes. The road system west of Murray Boulevard was initially designed to serve farming needs. It has proven to be inadequate in accommodating the travel needs of more recent residential development.
    [Show full text]