Hoosier Hoedown Tab Summary January 24-25, 2015

Indianapolis Indiana

Team Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Summary 1030 - Northwestern W W L L W W L L CS PD Δ v. 1359 Π- v. 1299- Π v. 1440 Δ- v. 1437 - 4 4 1031 - - Northwestern +11W +8 T 10W W3 +31 W +23 L L4 L3 21.5 CS +53PD Δ v. 1549 Π v. 1339 Δ v. 1462- Π - v. 1288- 4 3 1 1032 - Northwestern +12 L L0 +37 W +10 W +7W W2 L6 L1 CS16 +57 PD Π- v. 1438- Δ v. 1053 Δ v. 1358 Π- v. 1111- 4 4 1070 - Eastern W2 L2 +10 L L+8 +13 W +11 L 15L L7 13.5 CS +16 PD Kentucky Δ v. 1143- -Π v. 1437- Δ v. 1339- Π - v. 1163 - 2 6 - 1076 - Miami +7W 4L 12W W9 +13W W4 W5 1W CS18 PD3 Π v. 1548- Δ v. 1111 + Δ v. 1143+ Π v. 1438 7 1 1077 - Miami +11 W 10 W +3W 2L +23W 13L +10 W +10L 18.5CS +62 PD Δ v. 1191 Π v. 1440- Π v. 1300- Δ v. 1173- 5 3 1078 - - Miami +7L +4 T W+9 L4 W+5 3L +3L 3L CS18 +18 PD Π- v. 1111 Δ v. 1548- Π v. 1191- Δ -v. 1375 - 2 5 1- 1111 - - Illinois - W7 0T +4 L L2 +17W W6 W7 W3 CS19 PD4 Chicago Δ v. 1078 Π - v. 1076- Π v. 1359 Δ v. 1032+ 5 2 1 1141 - Loyola W+7 W 0 L3 L2 +33 W +2 W4 +15 W W7 17.5CS +81 PD Δ v. 1054+ Π - v. 1173- Δ v. 1601 Π v. 1462 6 2 1143 - Loyola +15W L25 W6 W6 +12L L +3 +7W +7W 15.5 CS +57 PD Π v. 1070- Δ v. 1439 + -Π v. 1076- Δ v. 1449+ 5 3 - 1163 - North Central +4L L7 +6 L L2 23W W13 +15W 10W CS15 PD6 Δ- v. 1173 - Π - v. 1359- Π v. 1463 Δ + v. 1070 + 4 4 -

11 9 4 2 +6 +1 5 1 13.5 25 1173 - Lewis W W W W L L W L CS PD Π v. 1163 Δ v. 1141 + Δ- v. 1190 - Π v. 1077- 5 3 1190 - - Chicago +11 W +9W +6W 6T W10 W6 +3L L3 20.5 CS +16 PD Π v. 1601 Δ v. 1315 Π v. 1173 Δ- v. 1299 - 5 2 1 1191 - - Chicago +20 L +13 L W+6 0T +10 W +6L W12 W10 CS21 +33 PD Π - v. 1077- Δ v. 1463 Δ v. 1078- Π v. 1358 4 3 1 1288 - Bradley L4 L7 +15 W W 0 +6W 17W +12W +2 W CS12 PD+7 Δ - v. 1299 - Π v. 1054 Π v. 1548 Δ v. 1031 + 6 2 1299 - Bellarmine W6 W14 +21W +39 W +9W +6 W +6W W1 CS19 +62 PD Π v. 1288 Δ v. 1030+ Δ v. 1438+ Π v. 1190 8 0 1300 - Bellarmine +14 W +6L +10 W W3 +9W L3 +12 W +10 W 19.5 CS +67PD Δ v. 1437- Π v. 1449 Δ v. 1077 - Π v. 1315 6 2 1301 - Murray State +6 L L5 +10L +15 L +3 L L5 +7L +2 L CS19 +33 PD -Π v. 1315- Δ- v. 1601 - -Π v. 1054- Δ- v. 1463 - 0 8- 1315 - - Xavier 34W 21W 39L 18 T 10W 9T 23L 11 L CS13 165 PD Δ v. 1301+ Π - v. 1190 Π v. 1549 Δ - v. 1300 - 3 3 2 1338 - Kentucky +34 W L21 W6 W0 +6L L 0 W7 L2 15CS.5 +47PD Δ v. 1462- Π v. 1375 -Π v. 1437- Δ v. 1549- 4 4 - 1339 - Kentucky +10W 4L +3L +3 L 12W 4L +3L 6L CS20 7PD Π v. 1611- Δ- v. 1031 - Π v. 1070- Δ- v. 1548 - 2 6 - 1358 - Eastern W+9 W4 37L 10 L +4 L L13 19L 8L 12.5CS PD78 Michigan Π v. 1463 Δ -v. 1438 - -Π v. 1032- Δ- v. 1191 - 2 6 - 1359 - Eastern +7 L +4 L W1 W1 13L 11 L W12 W2 CS15 PD29 Michigan Π - v. 1030- Δ v. 1163+ Δ- v. 1111 - Π v. 1602 4 4 - 1375 - Wheaton W8 11 L +4L L2 W33 24W +9W +7 W 14.5CS PD54 Π v. 1602 - Δ -v. 1338 - Δ v. 1439+ Π v. 1078 5 3 1437 - Indiana +5W L5 W3 W3 +11W W5 +7 W +3 W 10CS.5 +20PD Π v. 1300- Δ v. 1070+ Δ v. 1338+ Π v. 1030 7 1 1438 - Indiana +5W W6 +9W W12 +12 L L4 +4L +3 L 1CS6 +43PD Δ v. 1032 Π v. 1358 Π v. 1299 Δ v. 1076 4 4 + + - - - - - 1439 - Indiana +2W L2 +1 L L1 L9 3 L W10 10W CS21 PD26 Δ v. 1449- Π - v. 1143- Π- v. 1375- Δ v. 1611+ 3 5 1440 - - Indiana +2W 2 T W6 L2 11L 5L +29 L L 12 CS15 +19 PD Π v. 1053 Δ v. 1077- Δ- v. 1030 - Π- v. 1601- 2 5 -1 1449 - Kentucky W+1 0L +4L 9L W31 23W 12L L5 CS15 PD75 Π v. 1439- Δ- v. 1300 - Δ v. 1602+ Π- v. 1143- 3 5- 1462 - Case Western +2W L2 W15 10W +19W L3 15L 10 L CS15 28PD Π v. 1338- Δ v. 1602+ Π v. 1031- Δ - v. 1141 - 4 4 1463 - - Case Western +4L 10L +31L 14T +2L L7 W7 W7 15CS.5 +20PD Δ - v. 1358 - Π- v. 1191 Δ - v. 1163 - Π v. 1301 2 5 1 1548 - Iowa W7 L4 W15 0 L L6 L1 +23 W +11 W 10.5CS PD+1 Δ v. 1076- Π v. 1078- Δ - v. 1288 - Π v. 1339 4 4 1549 - - Iowa +10L 11 T +2W W4 L9 T6 +19W +8 L 17.5CS PD+9 Π- v. 1031 Δ v. 1611+ Δ -v. 1315 Π v. 1338- 3 3 2 1601 - Minnesota 12L 0L +17 W W1 L6 L0 +6W W3 14CS.5 PD+2 Δ- v. 1190 - Π v. 1301 Π- v. 1141- Δ v. 1440+ 4 4 1602 - Minnesota W13 20L +39 L +18 L 12L L3 +12L L5 CS14 +26 PD Δ v. 1375- Π- v. 1462- Π- v. 1449- Δ - v. 1359 - 1 7- 1611 - Xavier +5W L5 31L 14L W19 L3 L9 L7 CS16 83PD Δ v. 1339 - Π- v. 1549- Δ v. 1053- Π- v. 1439- 2 6 - 1053 dropped dropped Northwood +4L 9 T 17L L1 +2W 3 L 29out 14 11 out 67 Δ -v. 1440 Π- v. 1032- Π v. 1611- 1054 dropped dropped Northwood L1 L0 10L 8L +3W W2 out out Π- v. 1141- Δ- v. 1190 - Δ v. 1301+

15 25 21 39 +10 9 for the *Tab Note: In light of both Northwood teams dropping out before round 4, their average ballot per round was calculated for that round. This was then used calculation of their opponents CS.

Top Team Rankings st

1nd Place Bellarmine (1299)

2rd Place Miami (1076)

3th Place Indiana (1437)

4th Place Bradley (1288)

5 Place OutstandingBellarmine Attorneys (1300) Clio Sophia-Koller Sriya Siens 18 ranks Π Tori Latus IllinoisChicago – (1190) 18 ranks Δ Chicago (1191) 18 ranks Δ Chicago (1111) 18 ranks Δ Shannon Price Xavier (1315) 18 ranks Π MikeSamantha Slyvester Guttenberg NorthIowa (1548) Central ( 18 ranks Δ Chris Prescher Wheaton (1375) 18 ranks Π 1163) 18 ranks Δ Dhurti Patel Indiana (1439) 18 ranks Δ DeanSpe Olsen Indiana (1437)

19 ranks Δ ncer Tackett Miami (1076) 19 ranks Π Maya Rich Eastern Michigan (1358) 19 ranks Δ Bryan Wood Northwestern (1032) 19 ranks Δ Adam Farr Bellarmine (1300)

20 ranks Π OutstandingJohn Carl Grey III Witness Bellarmine (1299)

18 ranks Π Chen He Northwestern (1031) 18 ranks Π GadielErin Rotter Northwestern (1032) 18 ranks Π Frank Ungerer Northwestern (1030) 18 ranks Π Williams Chicago (1190) 18 ranks Π Kevin Jeffrey Bellarmine (1300) 18 ranks Π Logan Murphy Kentucky (1338) 18 ranks Δ NatalieRiddhi SSnyderhah Case Western (1462)

19 ranks Δ Loyola (1143) 19 ranks Π DaltonCalvin SandersStanley Indiana (1437)

20 Δ Eastern Kentucky (1070)