Project Reports SS17 Total.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Project Reports SS17 Total.Pdf EDUCATIONAL NETWORK ON SOIL AND PLANT ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT (EduSapMan) Summer School Soil & Water 2017 Practical exercises Content: 1. Stomatal kinetics in response to CO2 and its relation to stomatal size and density 2 2. Soil compaction and oxygen in soil 12 3. Soil zoology 17 4. Land properties influenced by land use and fertilization 25 5. Fast Plant test with various substrates and composts 49 6. Allelopathy experiment with Estonian trees 60 1 1. Stomatal kinetics in response to CO2 and its relation to stomatal size and density Markus Hügel, Kateřina Kabeláčová, Thomas Link-Hessing, Claude-Eric Marquet and Patrick Waldhelm Supervisors: Tiina Tosens, Linda-Liisa Veromann 1 Introduction Water use efficiency (WUE) is very often topic lately. The level of greenhouse gas CO2 is rising. That means, inorganic C is more available for plants to assimilate, but for photosynthesis is important water also. So on the other hand there is problem with water sufficiency, because of greenhouse gases, the average temperature of the planet is rising and dry areas are expanding. Plants are under a constant stress, because of drought. 2 Materials and methods 2.1 Measuring stomatal conductance and photosynthesis Materials: - Two plants Platanus orientalis (normal and stressed) - Fern Microsorum diversifolium - Two instruments GFS-3000 Portable Photosynthesis System Procedure: There were used two plants Platanus orientalis and one fern Microsorum diversifolium. One P. orientalis was not watered for seven days and the second P. orientalis was well watered. Plants were kept under artificial conditions. Plane trees were kept under the light intensity of 1000 µmol/m²s, 22 °C and 65% humidity. The M. diversifolium was kept under artificial light at 600 µmol/m²s, 22 °C and 65% humidity. Experiments were done in the plant physiology laboratory. The stomatal conductance and the photosynthesis were measured with two instruments GFS- 3000 Portable Photosynthesis System. At first chambers of the machines were adjusted to 2 these settings: temperature 25 °C and humidity 65%. The light settings differed: For plane trees it was set to 1000 µmol/m²s and 600 µmol/m²s for M. diversifolium. The CO2 levels in chambers were changed during measurements. At first the experiment begun with 400 ppm of CO2, then 100 ppm and at the end 800 ppm. Changes of CO2 levels were made after a stabilization of assimilation and stomatal conductance. There was also measured the time of a stabilization. Figure 1: GFS-3000 Portable Photosynthesis System Figure 2: P. orientalis leaf in measurement chamber 3 2.2 Stomatal size and density measurement Materials: - Transparent nail polish, transparent tape, slides - Light microscope, PC, Image-J software Procedure: The “varnish”-method was used. The leaf which was previously used for measuring, was coated with clear nail polish on the bottom of the leaf. Leaf-veins were avoided. After the nail polish was dry, transparent tape was sticked on it and pulled off. The tape with the dry varnish was sticked on the slides and analysed under the light microscope. Photos of the leaf bottom imprint were taken in a magnification of 100 and 200. To calculate the stomatal size the length and width of 10 stomata for each plant were measured with the computer program ImageJ. The stomatal size was calculated by multiplying the length with the width. To obtain the stomatal density the amount of stomata on three different parts of the leaf bottom were counted. To acquire average density the formula: number of stomata / area. Figure 3: Leaf bottom surface imprint on slides 4 Figure 4: Stomata of M. diversifolium at 200 magnification 5 Figure 5: Stomata of P. orientalis at 200 magnification 3 Results During the first experiment gained data about the stomatal conductance and the photosynthesis are in tables 1 and 2. Graphs in figure 6 and 7 were constructed from these data and from CO2 levels. We calculated values of WUE according to this formula: 퐴푠푚푙푎푡표푛 푊푈퐸 = 푝ℎ표푡표푠푛푡푒푠푠 푠푡표푚푎푡푎 푐표푛푑푢푐푡푎푛푐푒 Table 1: CO2 Assimilation of the three test plants CO2 P. orientalis (normal) P. orientalis (drought) M. diversifolium [ppm] 100 1,07 0,02 0,51 400 6,86 0,97 3,5 800 12,26 2,37 6,84 6 Figure 6: CO2 Assimilation of the three test plants Table 2: Stomata conductance of the three test plants CO2 P. orientalis (normal) P. orientalis (drought) M. diversifolium [ppm] 100 103,4 9,1 52,2 400 58,6 9,9 33,7 800 42,2 9,6 33,8 7 Figure 7: Stomata conductance of the three test plants WUE values were transferred into the table 3 and figure 8. Stabilization periods of plants was inserted into the table 4. Table 3: WUE of the three test plants CO2 P. orientalis (normal) P. orientalis (drought) M. diversifolium [ppm] 100 10 2 9 400 117 97 103 800 290 246 202 8 Figure 8: WUE of the three test plants Table 4: Stabilization period of the three test plants Measurement P. orientalis (normal) P. orientalis (drought) M. diversifolium 1. 40 min 8 min 62 min 2. 13 min 4 min 13 min 3. 22 min 5 min 17 min Summary 75 min 17 min 92 min The stomatal size and density are shown in figure 9 and 10. 9 Figure 9: Stomatal size of the three test plants Figure 10: Stomatal density of the three test plants 10 4 Discussion We observed reactions of stomata to different levels of CO2. The plant which was stressed by drought had lower stomata conductance than other plants. It could be related to the physiological mechanism which tend to protect the plant from complete dryness. The plant was stressed even more when there was low CO2 level. At the level 100 ppm well-watered plants managed to open the stomata more than the plant which suffered by drought. At the level 800 ppm plants had enough of CO2 in the chamber so they could close stomata. Even though the difference between plane trees is very visible, for better significance and good strength of the experiment, it would be good to do the experiment with more plants and different species. The varnish method showed us how simple it is to observe stomata structures and compare them between different plant families as gymnosperm and angiosperm. According to the evolution, we can suggest that angiosperm plants have smaller stomata structure and higher density compared to ancient gymnosperm family. On the other hand the habitat of the fern is more humid so it can manage to have bigger stomata than the plane tree. We realized that the fern needs more time to open stomata and have slower reaction to the changes of CO2 levels. For better resolution, there would be needed to have wide range of gymnosperm and angiosperm species to compare. 5 Conclusion The plane tree which suffered by drought had low stomata conductance during the whole experiment. The measuring took for 17 minutes in total and gs values were 9,1; 9,9 and 9,6 -1 mmolH2O. WUE values were 2; 97 and 248 µmolCO2∙mmolH2O . Well-watered plane tree had higher values. Stomatal conductance values were 103,4; 58,6 and 42,2 mmolH2O. WUE values -1 for well-watered plane tree were 10; 117 and 290 µmolCO2∙mmolH2O . The measuring took for 75 minutes. The fern had slightly lower values in comparison to well-watered plane tree. Values of stomatal conductance were 52,2; 33,7 and 33,8 mmolH2O. WUE values were 9; 103 -1 and 202 µmolCO2∙mmolH2O . The measuring of the fern took for 92 minutes. 11 Summer School Soil & Water Tartu 2017 Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Marian Kazda, Ahmed Sharif 2. Soil compaction and oxygen in soil Linda Ahner Milan Varsadiya Laurie-May Gonzales Bernhard Glocker Contents 1 Introduction 2 Materials and Methods 3 Results 4 Discussion 5 Conclusion 6 References 12 1 Introduction Nowadays drip irrigation has gained more important in agriculture and has been used very intensively on the fields. Although this is a more sustained way to irrigate the plants, it limits oxygen availability for plant roots by creating a nearly saturated condition. Furthermore, high soil compaction also affects the amount of oxygen content in soil which changes gas exchange. In general, gas exchange is also affecting growth and activity of roots and soil organisms, and leading to an alteration of chemical processes (Ampoorter et al., 2010). For instance, N fertilization has significant effect on microbial CO2 respiration and communities functioning. This was also proved by laboratory incubation experiments (Kowalenka et al., 1978). In Summary soil compaction involves the compression of pores, which leads to decreased porosity, increase in dry bulk density and reduce hydraulic conductivity. The questions of this short experiment were “Soil with organic manure has more oxygen depletion rate than soil without manure” and “Soil managed with organic fertilizer contains lower bulk density”. 2 Materials and Methods Six samples were collected on 26th of June 2017 from the long-term fertilization experiment-site IOSDV in Tartu. Two samples were collected from the same field without organic fertilizers and without manure, two from the same field but with manure. And the last two samples were collected from the field with an alternative organic fertilizer. The samples were collected in metal cylinders from five centimetres under the surface and these were put in plastic cups. The second part was in the laboratory. First, the samples were weighted and after that all samples were flooded with double distilled water (ddH2O) until the complete soil was saturated. All samples got an oxygen sensor through the plastic lid. For the measurement, the “FIBOX LCD” was used.
Recommended publications
  • Tillage and Soil Ecology: Partners for Sustainable Agriculture
    Soil & Tillage Research 111 (2010) 33–40 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Soil & Tillage Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/still Review Tillage and soil ecology: Partners for sustainable agriculture Jean Roger-Estrade a,b,*, Christel Anger b, Michel Bertrand b, Guy Richard c a AgroParisTech, UMR 211 INRA/AgroParisTech., Thiverval-Grignon, 78850, France b INRA, UMR 211 INRA/AgroParisTech. Thiverval-Grignon, 78850, France c INRA, UR 0272 Science du sol, Centre de recherche d’Orle´ans, Orle´ans, 45075, France ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Much of the biodiversity of agroecosystems lies in the soil. The functions performed by soil biota have Tillage major direct and indirect effects on crop growth and quality, soil and residue-borne pests, diseases Soil ecology incidence, the quality of nutrient cycling and water transfer, and, thus, on the sustainability of crop Agroecosystems management systems. Farmers use tillage, consciously or inadvertently, to manage soil biodiversity. Soil biota Given the importance of soil biota, one of the key challenges in tillage research is understanding and No tillage Plowing predicting the effects of tillage on soil ecology, not only for assessments of the impact of tillage on soil organisms and functions, but also for the design of tillage systems to make the best use of soil biodiversity, particularly for crop protection. In this paper, we first address the complexity of soil ecosystems, the descriptions of which vary between studies, in terms of the size of organisms, the structure of food webs and functions. We then examine the impact of tillage on various groups of soil biota, outlining, through examples, the crucial effects of tillage on population dynamics and species diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil and Litter Invertebrates and Heterotrophic Process: 1997 Revision
    ES/ER/TM-126/R2 Toxicological Benchmarks for Contaminants of Potential Concern for Effects on Soil and Litter Invertebrates and Heterotrophic Process: 1997 Revision This document has been approved by the East Tennessee Technology Park Technical Information Office for release to the public. Date: ES/ER/TM-126/R2 Toxicological Benchmarks for Contaminants of Potential Concern for Effects on Soil and Litter Invertebrates and Heterotrophic Process: 1997 Revision R. A. Efroymson M. E. Will G. W. Suter II Date Issued—November 1997 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management under budget and reporting code EW 20 LOCKHEED MARTIN ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. managing the Environmental Management Activities at the East Tennessee Technology Park Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant Oak Ridge National Laboratory Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant under contract DE-AC05-84OR21400 for the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY PREFACE This report presents a standard method for deriving benchmarks for the purpose of “contaminant screening,” performed by comparing measured ambient concentrations of chemicals. The work was performed under Work Breakdown Structure 1.4.12.2.3.04.07.02 (Activity Data Sheet 8304). In addition, this report presents sets of data concerning the effects of chemicals in soil on invertebrates and soil microbial processes, benchmarks for chemicals potentially associated with United States Department of Energy sites, and literature describing the experiments from which data were drawn for benchmark derivation. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to thank Carla Gunderson and Art Stewart for their helpful reviews of the document. In addition, the authors would like to thank Christopher Evans and Alexander Wooten for conducting part of the literature review.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Fauna: Key to New Carbon Models Authors
    SOIL Discuss., doi:10.5194/soil-2016-19, 2016 Manuscript under review for journal SOIL Published: 14 April 2016 c Author(s) 2016. CC-BY 3.0 License. 1 1 2 Soil fauna: key to new carbon models 3 4 Authors 5 6 Juliane Filser1*, Jack H. Faber2, Alexei V. Tiunov3, Lijbert Brussaard4, Jan Frouz5, 7 Gerlinde De Deyn4, Alexei V. Uvarov3, Matty P. Berg6, Patrick Lavelle7, Michel Loreau8, 8 Diana H. Wall9, Pascal Querner10, Herman Eijsackers11, Juan José Jiménez12 9 10 1Center for Environmental Research and Sustainable Technolgy, University of Bremen, General and Theoretical 11 Ecology, Leobener Str. – UFT, D-28359 Bremen, Germany. 12 email: [email protected] 13 * Corresponding author 14 15 2Alterra, Wageningen UR, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands 16 email: [email protected] 17 3Laboratory of Soil Zoology, Institute of Ecology & Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky prospekt 33, 18 119071 Moscow, Russia 19 email: [email protected] 20 email: [email protected] 21 4Dept. of Soil Quality, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands 22 email: [email protected] 23 email: [email protected] 24 5Institute for Environmental Studies, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Benátská 2, 128 43 Praha 2, 25 Czech Republic 26 email: [email protected] 27 6Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Ecological Science, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The 28 Netherlands 29 email: [email protected] 30 7Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Centre IRD Ile de France, 32, rue H. Varagnat, 93143 Bondy Cedex, France 31 email: [email protected] 32 8Centre for Biodiversity Theory and Modelling, Station d'Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale, UMR 5321 CNRS & 33 Université Paul Sabatier, 2, route du CNRS, 09200 Moulis, France 34 email: [email protected] 35 9School of Global Environmental Sustainability & Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Fauna: Key to New Carbon Models
    SOIL, 2, 565–582, 2016 www.soil-journal.net/2/565/2016/ doi:10.5194/soil-2-565-2016 SOIL © Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Soil fauna: key to new carbon models Juliane Filser1, Jack H. Faber2, Alexei V. Tiunov3, Lijbert Brussaard4, Jan Frouz5, Gerlinde De Deyn4, Alexei V. Uvarov3, Matty P. Berg6, Patrick Lavelle7, Michel Loreau8, Diana H. Wall9, Pascal Querner10, Herman Eijsackers11, and Juan José Jiménez12 1Center for Environmental Research and Sustainable Technology, University of Bremen, General and Theoretical Ecology, Leobener Str. – UFT, 28359 Bremen, Germany 2Wageningen Environmental Research (Alterra), P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, the Netherlands 3Laboratory of Soil Zoology, Institute of Ecology & Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky prospekt 33, 119071 Moscow, Russia 4Dept. of Soil Quality, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, the Netherlands 5Institute for Environmental Studies, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Benátská 2, 128 43 Praha 2, Czech Republic 6Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Ecological Science, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands 7Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Centre IRD Ile de France, 32, rue H. Varagnat, 93143 Bondy CEDEX, France 8Centre for Biodiversity Theory and Modelling, Station d’Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale, UMR5321 – CNRS & Université Paul Sabatier, 2, route du CNRS, 09200 Moulis, France 9School of Global Environmental Sustainability & Dept. Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1036, USA 10University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Department of Integrated Biology and Biodiversity Research, Institute of Zoology, Gregor-Mendel-Straße 33, 1180 Vienna, Austria 11Wageningen University and Research Centre, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Articles, and the Creation of New Soil Habitats in Other Scientific fields Who Also Made Early Contributions Through the Weathering of Rocks (Puente Et Al., 2004)
    Editorial SOIL, 1, 117–129, 2015 www.soil-journal.net/1/117/2015/ doi:10.5194/soil-1-117-2015 SOIL © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. The interdisciplinary nature of SOIL E. C. Brevik1, A. Cerdà2, J. Mataix-Solera3, L. Pereg4, J. N. Quinton5, J. Six6, and K. Van Oost7 1Department of Natural Sciences, Dickinson State University, Dickinson, ND, USA 2Departament de Geografia, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain 3GEA-Grupo de Edafología Ambiental , Departamento de Agroquímica y Medio Ambiente, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Avda. de la Universidad s/n, Edificio Alcudia, Elche, Alicante, Spain 4School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia 5Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK 6Department of Environmental Systems Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH Zurich, Tannenstrasse 1, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland 7Georges Lemaître Centre for Earth and Climate Research, Earth and Life Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium Correspondence to: J. Six ([email protected]) Received: 26 August 2014 – Published in SOIL Discuss.: 23 September 2014 Revised: – – Accepted: 23 December 2014 – Published: 16 January 2015 Abstract. The holistic study of soils requires an interdisciplinary approach involving biologists, chemists, ge- ologists, and physicists, amongst others, something that has been true from the earliest days of the field. In more recent years this list has grown to include anthropologists, economists, engineers, medical professionals, military professionals, sociologists, and even artists. This approach has been strengthened and reinforced as cur- rent research continues to use experts trained in both soil science and related fields and by the wide array of issues impacting the world that require an in-depth understanding of soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Faunal Activities and Soil Processes : Adaptive Strategies That Determine
    F Faunal Activities .and Soil Processes: Adaptive Strategies That Determine Ecosystem Function P . LAVELLE I . Summary ................................................. 93 II . Introduction ............................................... 94 III . The role of invertebrates in the soil system ....................... 96 N . Adaptive strategies of soil organisms: the sleeping beauty and the ecosystem engineers ........................................ 97 V . Microfauna: microbial regulation in micro-foodwebs ...............101 A . The composition of micro-foodwebs ........................ 101 B., Distribution and dispersal of microsites ..................... 103 C. Evidence for the functional importance of micro-foodwebs: effects on SOM dynamics ...................104 VI . Saprophagous arthropoda: the litter transformers ..................105 A . Niche .............................................. 105 B . Structures ............................................ 105 C. Effects on physical parameters of soil ...................... 106 D . SOM dynamics ....................................... 106 E. Effects on plant growth in microcosms ..................... 108 VII. Termites and earthworms: the ecosystem engineers ................108 A . Roles ............................................... 108 B . Effects on physical structure ............................. 109 C. Effects on SOM dynamics ............................... 115 D. Effects on plant growth ................................. 118 Vm . Conclusions .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Future for Soil Ecology ? Connecting the System Levels
    Eur. J. Soil Biol. 37 (2001) 213−220 © 2001 Éditions scientifiques et médicales Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved S1164556301010871/FLA A future for soil ecology ? Connecting the system levels: moving from genomes to ecosystems Opening Lecture to the XIII ICSZ “Biodiversity of soil organisms and ecosystem functioning” Herman Eijsackers* Alterra Green World Research, POB 47 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands and Institute for Ecological Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands Received 18 August 2000; accepted 23 July 2001 Abstract − As an introduction to the XIII ICSZ “Biodiversity of soil organisms and ecosystem functioning” the question is raised what contribution soil ecology has made to general ecology. Although the appearance of soil ecological papers in general ecological journals is limited, soil ecologists have had a major contribution to especially functional aspects of ecology like nutrient release and energy turnover mechanisms, perhaps partly due to the applied character of soil ecology. As a way forward it is suggested to unify further work and scientific discussions according to five research themes: 1. Combined spatial and temporal heterogeneity; 2. Scaling up from individual mobility via distribution patterns to bio-geography; 3. Structural and functional biodiversity: from gene- to ecosystem level; 4. Nutrient cycling/energy transfer at the micro- to macro-level; 5. Adaptability from bacteria to ecosystems: is there a mutual mechanism connecting genetic variation with ecosystems´ adaptive mechanisms? © 2001 Éditions scientifiques et médicales Elsevier SAS micro- and macro-scale connections / nutrient cycling / organism adaptability / soil ecology / spatial and temporal heterogeneity 1. INTRODUCTION 2000 to discuss the way forward in the 21st century (see for an overview [27]).
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and the Challenge of a Multifunctional Use of Soil
    Ecology and the challenge of a multifunctional use of soil Patrick Lavelle(1) (1)Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (Instituto TSBF), Apartado aereo 6713, Cali, Colombia. E‑mail: [email protected] Abstract – Soil zoology and soil ecology have become very active fields of research since the early 1990s. A search in the ISI Web of Science databases showed a steady increase in publications about that theme over the last two decades, and 3,612 bibliographic references were found for that theme for the period of 2004 to 2008. The researches covered mostly soil environmental issues, toxicology and ecology. The issue of theoretical development in soil ecology is discussed, and arguments are presented against the idea that the soil ecology theory is deficient. Finally, the need for a general model of soil function and soil management is discussed and some options are presented to reach this goal. Index terms: auto organization, panarchy, soil ecology, soil zoology. Ecologia e o desafio do uso multifuncional do solo Resumo – A zoologia e a ecologia do solo tornaram-se áreas de pesquisa muito ativas a partir do início da década de 1990. Uma busca realizada na base de dados ISI Web of Science mostrou um gradual aumento no número de publicações sobre o assunto nas últimas duas décadas, tendo sido encontradas 3.612 referências bibliográficas para o período de 2004 a 2008. As pesquisas abordaram principalmente assuntos ambientais, toxicologia e ecologia. O desenvolvimento da teoria em ecologia do solo é discutido, e são apresentados argumentos contra a ideia de que existe deficiência na teoria em ecologia do solo.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Arthropods in Maintaining Soil Fertility
    Agriculture 2013, 3, 629-659; doi:10.3390/agriculture3040629 OPEN ACCESS agriculture ISSN 2077-0472 www.mdpi.com/journal/agriculture Review Role of Arthropods in Maintaining Soil Fertility Thomas W. Culliney Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Center for Plant Health Science and Technology, USDA-APHIS, 1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 300, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-919-855-7506; Fax: +1-919-855-7595 Received: 6 August 2013; in revised form: 31 August 2013 / Accepted: 3 September 2013 / Published: 25 September 2013 Abstract: In terms of species richness, arthropods may represent as much as 85% of the soil fauna. They comprise a large proportion of the meso- and macrofauna of the soil. Within the litter/soil system, five groups are chiefly represented: Isopoda, Myriapoda, Insecta, Acari, and Collembola, the latter two being by far the most abundant and diverse. Arthropods function on two of the three broad levels of organization of the soil food web: they are plant litter transformers or ecosystem engineers. Litter transformers fragment, or comminute, and humidify ingested plant debris, which is deposited in feces for further decomposition by micro-organisms, and foster the growth and dispersal of microbial populations. Large quantities of annual litter input may be processed (e.g., up to 60% by termites). The comminuted plant matter in feces presents an increased surface area to attack by micro-organisms, which, through the process of mineralization, convert its organic nutrients into simpler, inorganic compounds available to plants. Ecosystem engineers alter soil structure, mineral and organic matter composition, and hydrology.
    [Show full text]
  • The Values of Soil Animals for Conservation Biology
    Available online at www.sciencedirecl.com --" EUROPEAN JOURNAL Of -.;- ScienceDirect SOll BIOLOGY ELSEVIER European Journal of Soil Biology 42 (2006) S23-838 http://france.elsevier.comldirectlejsobi Original article The values of sail animaIs for conservation biology a b c b T. Decaëns ,*, II Jiménez , C. Gioia , G.J. Measeyb, P. Lavelle •Laboratoire d'écologie-ECOD/V, UPRES EA /293, université de Rouen, 76821 Mt Saint Aignan cedex, France b Laboratoire d'écologie des sols tropicaux, lRD, 32, Avenue Henri-Varagnat, 93143 Bondy cedex, France C Bureau d'élude AL/SE. 228, ZAC de la Forge-Seret, 76520 Boos, France Available online 21 July 2006 Abstract It has taken time for the international community to accept the idea of biodiversity values, a concept which had previously been restricted to the limited aesthetic and touristic aspects ofwildlife. This situation changed following the International Convention on Biodiversity in Rio de Janeiro (1992), which focussed on "the forgotten environmental problem" ofbiodiversity erosion and made the first clear reference to the values of living species. Biodiversity values refer to direct or indirect, economic or non-economic interest, a given species or ecosystem may represent for human populations. These values are generally split into intrinsic and instrumental (use) values, the last category itself being divided into direct and indirect economic values. Obviously, each of these values cames different weights, and cannot be considered as being weighted equally in terms of justification for species or ecosystem conservation. Soil is probably one ofthe most species-rich habitats of terrestrial ecosystems, especially if the defmition is extended to related habitats like vertebrate faeces, decaying wood, and humus ofhollow trees (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Fauna: a Retrospection with Reference to Indian Soil
    International Journal of Research Studies in Zoology (IJRSZ) Volume 2, Issue 3, 2016, PP 17-38 ISSN 2454-941X http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2454-941X.0203003 www.arcjournals.org Soil Fauna: A Retrospection with Reference to Indian Soil Umesh Kumar1, Rajendra Singh 1S. R. Degree College, Gajpur, Banspar, Gorakhpur Department of Zoology, D.D.U. Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, U.P., India [email protected] Abstract: Soil is a living, dynamic ecosystem. Healthy soil is packed with microscopic and larger organisms that perform many vital functions including converting dead and decaying matter as well as minerals to plant nutrients. Different soil organisms feed on different organic substrates. Their biological activity depends on the organic matter supply. Nutrient exchanges between organic matter, water and soil are essential to soil fertility and need to be maintained for sustainable production purposes. Where the soil is exploited for crop production without restoring the organic matter and nutrient contents and maintaining a good structure, the nutrient cycles are broken, soil fertility declines and the balance in the agro-ecosystem is destroyed. Soil organic matter - the product of on-site biological decomposition - affects the chemical and physical properties of the soil and its overall health. Soil ecosystem supports a complex of animal communities of which soil arthropods were of prime importance since they constitute the major component of soil mesofauna in all types of soils. The soil arthropods includes a variety of mites, collembolans, pseudoscorpions, centipedes, millipedes, symphylans, diplurans, proturans, hymenopterans, coleopterans etc. they play an important role in releasing nutrients and improve productivity within the forest ecosystem (less disturbed ecosystem) by decomposition process.
    [Show full text]
  • Micromorphology of Soils Micromorphology of Soils
    MICROMORPHOLOGY OF SOILS MICROMORPHOLOGY OF SOILS E.A. FITZPATRICK Department oj Soil Science University oj Aberdeen, UK LONDON NEW YORK CHAPMAN AND HALL First published 1984 by Chapman and Hall Ltd 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Published in the USA by Chapman and Hall 733 Third Avenue, New York, NY to017 © 1984 E.A. FitzPatrick Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1984 ISBN-13: 978-94-010-8946-3 e-ISBN-13: 978-94-009-5544-8 DO I: 10.1007/978-94-009-5544-8 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted, or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data FitzPatrick, E. A. Micromorphology of soils 1. Soils - Analysis I. Title 631.4'1 S593 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data FitzPatrick, Ewart Adsil. Micromorphology of soils. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Soil micromorphology. I. Title. S593.2.F58 1984 631.4 83-24002 Contents Preface page Xl Acknowledgements Xlll 1 Principles of thin section preparation 1 1.1 Choosing the size of the thin section 1 1.2 Collecting the sample 2 1.3 Removing water from the sample 2 1.4 Impregnating the sample 2 1.5 Lapping the impregnated sample 3 1.6 Polishing the impregnated sample 4 1.7 Grinding, lapping and polishing the 5 slide 2 Preparation ofpolished blocks and thin 6 sections ofsoils 2.1 Collection ofsamples
    [Show full text]