DOCSLIB.ORG

Northampton Gateway’ SRFI Development Proposal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Northampton Gateway’ SRFI Development Proposal Roxhill’s ‘Northampton Gateway’ SRFI Development Proposal Our Case Against Part A A submission to the Planning Inspectorate on the Environmental and Social Impacts on local communities, of a proposed industrial development of 5 million Sq. ft. on 500 acres of open countryside. Prepared on behalf of local communities by the ‘Stop Roxhill Northampton Gateway’ Action Group PINS Reference: TRO50006 Unique Registration ID Number: 20011012 1 Table of Contents 1. ROXHILL PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION – AN OVERVIEW......................................................................... 3 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................................... 4 3. PLANNING COMPLIANCE ................................................................................................................. 14 4. VALIDITY OF SITE SELECTION & ALTERNATIVE SITES ...................................................................... 27 5. RAIL ACCESS & CAPACITY ................................................................................................................ 30 6. AIR QUALITY .................................................................................................................................... 43 7. HEALTH IMPLICATIONS .................................................................................................................... 63 8. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ................................................................................................................ 81 8.1 Ensuring the Accuracy & Objectivity of Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA’s) ............... 81 8.2 Landscape .................................................................................................................................. 84 8.3 Public Rights of Way .................................................................................................................. 88 8.4 Ecology ....................................................................................................................................... 91 8.5 Cultural Heritage........................................................................................................................ 95 8.6 Flooding, Sewerage & Ground Water ..................................................................................... 101 8.7 Noise Pollution ........................................................................................................................ 105 9. EMPLOYMENT................................................................................................................................ 110 10. PUBLIC OPINION .......................................................................................................................... 114 11. CRIME........................................................................................................................................... 126 12. SUMMARY OF KEY CONCLUSIONS & OBJECTIONS ...................................................................... 129 APPENDIX A - SRNG ACTION GROUP TEAM MEMBERS DETAILS .................................................. 132 APPENDIX B - GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................. 133 2 1. ROXHILL PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION – AN OVERVIEW The Roxhill Northampton Gateway (RNG) application is for the development of a Strategic Rail Freight Interchange (SRFI) together with landscaping, access and other supporting infrastructure works. It consists of: • An intermodal freight terminal including container storage and HGV parking, with new rail sidings within the site to serve individual buildings. • Capability to provide a ‘rapid rail freight’ facility as part of the intermodal freight terminal. • Up to 6,000,000 sq. ft / 557,418 sq. m. (gross internal area) of warehousing and ancillary buildings. • New road infrastructure and works to the existing road network, including provision of a new access and associated works to the A508, a new bypass to the village of Roade, and substantial improvements to Junction 15 of the M1. • Strategic landscaping and tree planting, including retained diverted public rights of way • Earthworks and demolition of existing structures on-site. • The relocation of an Aggregates Depot; this was added to the scope of their proposal after the last and final round of Roxhill Northampton Gateways (Roxhill NG’s) public consultation meetings late last year (c. Dec 2017). Reference: 1. https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/projects/east-midlands/northampton- gateway-rail-freight-interchange/ 3 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction This submission paper to the Planning Inspectorate (PINS) is in direct response to Roxhills Northampton Gateways (Roxhill NG’s) Strategic Rail Freight Interchange (SRFI) proposal and has been compiled by multiple members of the Stop Roxhill Northampton Gateway Action Group (SRNG Action Group) who strongly object to Roxhill NG’s proposal. Details of the SRNG Action Groups Contact Details can be found in Appendix A. SRNG Action Group Objections – An Overview ES1 – A Strategic Proposal? Whilst the SRNG Action Group recognize the National Policy Statement for National Networks (NPSNN) policy requirement for the UK’s rail network to be expanded to cater for future growth in rail freight traffic and the need for the SRFI network capacity to be extended by the logistics industry to encourage more freight traffic, it is evident that Roxhill NG’s proposal is not aligned with the NPSNN policies. For example, Roxhills NG’s SRFI proposal does not: 1. Best serve the UK’s government driven objectives to expand the network of large SRFI’s across the regions especially in areas poorly served by such facilities at present. 2. Take into consideration that the NPSNN clearly states that existing operational SRFI’s and other intermodal Rail Freight Interchanges (RFI’s) are already predominantly situated in the Midlands and the North at this time. 3. Consider that the NPSNN also state that SRFI capacity needs to be provided at a wide range of locations to provide the flexibility required to match the changing needs of the market. The SRNG Action Group acknowledge that Roxhill NG’s proposal has been accepted as a strategic proposal for examination purposes by PINS, however, we challenge the unproven strategic nature of Roxhill NG’s proposal for the following/additional reasons: • Daventry International Rail Freight Terminal (DIRFT), only 18 miles from the Roxhill NG’s proposed SRFI site, already provides a SRFI (with more than adequate warehousing capacity) to serve the Midlands area for the foreseeable future. The historic take-up of space at DIRFT is less than 50,000m2 per annum. Unless a major change in buyer behaviour occurs or can be proven, DIRFT Phase III will provide capacity for over 15 years, therefore, granting consent for Roxhill NG’s SRFI proposal would risk the success of DIRFT by creating a situation whereby both sites would be competing for the same train paths. • Roxhill NG’s proposed site is situated halfway between major centres of production and consumption i.e. London and Birmingham. This contravenes the NPSNN policy to locate SRFI’s at major nodes. Planned investment in the Strategic Rail Network should target major freight flows from Felixstowe and Southampton to the West Midlands effectively bypassing Roxhill NG’s proposed SRFI location to the West and North. Only when paths are released by High Speed 2 (HS2) would there be any prospect of a significant modal shift from road to rail. The SRNG Action Group feel strongly that future and potential capacity should not be used as a justification for consent of Roxhill NG’s SRFI proposal as it cannot be accurately predicted or guaranteed. • Oversupply of SRFI’s in the region and undersupply in regions poorly served or currently lacking a SRFI would magnify regional economic imbalances and undermine national policy. 4 • Roxhill NG’s proposed SRFI site is too close to points of origin to permit economic rail freight for most users; a minimum viable rail freight range is 200 km and this is limited to bulk commodities which don’t require processing, sorting or repackaging. In addition, Roxhill NG’s SRFI proposal does not cater exclusively for such markets. • Realisation of drawbacks at Prologis Eurohub near Corby meant that its projected rail link was never laid. Indeed, the number of freight train movements in the UK has declined from approx. 416,000 train movements in 2003/04 to approx. 216,000 train movements in 2017/18 (source: http:// http://orr.gov.uk). Furthermore, recent reports confirm a decrease in the use of rail freight by 20% down to 0.4% growth from predictions of a 5% increase year on year. • Roxhill NG’s proposed SRFI site has an extensive history of bids and proposals to change its use from arable land to various industrial enterprises. All, thus far, have failed or were abandoned as respectively they contravene the Joint Core Strategy (JCS) and Local Planning processes. Roxhill are undoubtedly aware of these facts given that they were party to (some if not all) earlier/aborted proposals. They have stressed in their consultations that their proposed SRFI site lies within a ‘Golden Triangle’, but this term relates to road haulage only and not to road and rail – a fundamental misconception which Roxhill appear to have overlooked in their proposal. The aforementioned key points are reflected in the graphical maps directly below: RFI’s & SRFI’s in the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SEMLEP NORTHAMPTON WATERSIDE ENTERPRISE ZONE BOARD MEETING Minutes of the Meeting Held on Monday, 26Th March 2018
    SEMLEP NORTHAMPTON WATERSIDE ENTERPRISE ZONE BOARD MEETING Minutes of the meeting held on Monday, 26th March 2018. PRESENT: Board Ann Limb * Chair of SEMLEP Clive Faine * SEMLEP, Chair of Property Development and Infrastructure Delivery Group Cllr. Jonathan Nunn * Leader, Northampton Borough Council Cllr. Tim Hadland* Northampton Borough Council Paul Walker Northampton Borough Council Rick O’Farrell Northampton Borough Council Stuart McGregor Northampton Borough Council Amy Eyles LGSS Finance Carol Wood LGSS Finance Craig Forsyth Northampton Borough Council Terry Neville * University of Northampton Brian Binley * SEMLEP Board Member Marina Stafford Northampton Borough Council (Minutes) APOLOGIES Mike Todman BEIS Cllr. Andre Gonzalez de Savage * Northamptonshire County Council Andrew Parker BIS, Policy Advisor, Cities & Local Growth Unit Andrew Lewer MP, Northampton South Cllr. Matt Golby* Northamptonshire County Council Ed Chapman MHCLG Tom Wells* SEMLEP Board Member Roy Boulton Northamptonshire County Council * - Board member. 1. Welcome and Introductions AL welcomed everyone to the meeting and introductions were made. 2. Declarations of Interest AL asked if there were any declarations of interest. No financial or non-financial interests were declared. 1 | P a g e 3. Apologies Apologies were noted, as above. AL advised that she had chaired the Board since its inception, some seven years previously, and advised that she would be giving this up at the end of the year. AL gave a brief update on LEPs in general, and advised that 16 LEPs had been considered good, with some of the 16 being considered exceptional and that she was pleased to advise that SEMLEP was one of the exceptional LEPs. It is the SEMLEP Board’s intention to be exceptional in everything by the end of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Ouse and Waveney Project
    Transnational Ecological Network (TEN3) Mott MacDonald Norfolk County Council Transnational Ecological Network (TEN3) Little Ouse and Waveney Project May 2006 214980-UA02/01/B - 12th May 2006 Transnational Ecological Network (TEN3) Mott MacDonald Norfolk County Council Transnational Ecological Network (TEN3) Little Ouse and Waveney Project Issue and Revision Record Rev Date Originator Checker Approver Description 13 th Jan J. For January TEN A E. Lunt 2006 Purseglove workshop 24 th May E. Lunt J. B Draft for Comment 2006 Purseglove This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any o ther project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Mott MacDonald being obtained. Mott MacDonald accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequence of this document being used for a pur pose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person using or relying on the document for such other purpose agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm his agreement to indemnify Mott MacDonald for all loss or damage re sulting therefrom. Mott MacDonald accepts no responsibility or liability for this document to any party other than the person by whom it was commissioned. To the extent that this report is based on information supplied by other parties, Mott MacDonald accepts no liability for any loss or damage suffered by the client, whether contractual or tortious, stemming from any conclusions based on data supplied by parties other than Mott MacDonald and used by Mott MacDonald in preparing this report.
    [Show full text]
  • T1)E Bedford,1)Ire Naturaii,T 45
    T1)e Bedford,1)ire NaturaIi,t 45 Journal for the year 1990 Bedfordshire Natural History Society 1991 'ISSN 0951 8959 I BEDFORDSHffiE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY 1991 Chairman: Mr D. Anderson, 88 Eastmoor Park, Harpenden, Herts ALS 1BP Honorary Secretary: Mr M.C. Williams, 2 Ive! Close, Barton-le-Clay, Bedford MK4S 4NT Honorary Treasurer: MrJ.D. Burchmore, 91 Sundon Road, Harlington, Dunstable, Beds LUS 6LW Honorary Editor (Bedfordshire Naturalist): Mr C.R. Boon, 7 Duck End Lane, Maulden, Bedford MK4S 2DL Honorary Membership Secretary: Mrs M.]. Sheridan, 28 Chestnut Hill, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, Beds LU7 7TR Honorary Scientific Committee Secretary: Miss R.A. Brind, 46 Mallard Hill, Bedford MK41 7QS Council (in addition to the above): Dr A. Aldhous MrS. Cham DrP. Hyman DrD. Allen MsJ. Childs Dr P. Madgett MrC. Baker Mr W. Drayton MrP. Soper Honorary Editor (Muntjac): Ms C. Aldridge, 9 Cowper Court, Markyate, Herts AL3 8HR Committees appointed by Council: Finance: Mr]. Burchmore (Sec.), MrD. Anderson, Miss R. Brind, Mrs M. Sheridan, Mr P. Wilkinson, Mr M. Williams. Scientific: Miss R. Brind (Sec.), Mr C. Boon, Dr G. Bellamy, Mr S. Cham, Miss A. Day, DrP. Hyman, MrJ. Knowles, MrD. Kramer, DrB. Nau, MrE. Newman, Mr A. Outen, MrP. Trodd. Development: Mrs A. Adams (Sec.), MrJ. Adams (Chairman), Ms C. Aldridge (Deputy Chairman), Mrs B. Chandler, Mr M. Chandler, Ms]. Childs, Mr A. Dickens, MrsJ. Dickens, Mr P. Soper. Programme: MrJ. Adams, Mr C. Baker, MrD. Green, MrD. Rands, Mrs M. Sheridan. Trustees (appointed under Rule 13): Mr M. Chandler, Mr D. Green, Mrs B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Old Maltings and Former St Mark's Church, Green Street
    The Old Maltings and Former St Mark’s Church, Green Street, Northampton An Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment for Linfield Ltd by Jennifer Lowe Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd Site Code MGN 05/112 November 2005 Summary Site name: The Old Maltings and Former St Mark’s Church, Green Street, Northampton Grid reference: SP 7486 6032 Site activity: Desk-based assessment Project manager: Steve Ford Site supervisor: Jennifer Lowe Site code: MGN05/112 Area of site: 0.29ha Summary of results: The site is located within an area of high archaeological potential. The site is known to be located within the historic core of the town as previous work on and around the site has recorded Saxon and medieval defences in this area. This report may be copied for bona fide research or planning purposes without the explicit permission of the copyright holder Report edited/checked by: Steve Ford9 16.11.05 Steve Preston9 16.11.05 i Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd, 47–49 De Beauvoir Road, Reading RG1 5NR Tel. (0118) 926 0552; Fax (0118) 926 0553; email [email protected]; website : www.tvas.co.uk The Old Maltings and Former St Mark’s Church, Green Street, Northampton An Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment by Jennifer Lowe Report 05/112 Introduction This desk-based study is an assessment of the archaeological potential of a plot of land located on Green Street, Northampton (Fig. 1). The project was commissioned by Mr Henry Venners of The John Phillips Planning Consultancy, Bagley Court, Hinksey Hill, Oxford, OX1 5BS on behalf of Linfield Ltd and comprises the first stage of a process to determine the presence/absence, extent, character, quality and date of any archaeological remains which may be affected by redevelopment of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Plot 1, 4 Port Road, Duston, Northampton, NN5 6NL Guide Price
    Chartered Surveyors | Auctioneers | Estate Agents | Valuers Guide Price Plot 1, 4 Port Road, Duston, £250,000 Northampton, NN5 6NL An exciting new development of only three homes on the outskirts of Duston, close to Harlestone Firs and beautiful Northamptonshire countryside yet within a vibrant community with excellent access to major road & rail networks close by. DESCRIPTION Occupying three floors of accommodation each property has been carefully planned & designed to suit the needs of today's lifestyles. The ground floor will briefly comprise of a hall, cloakroom, sitting room, fitted kitchen/breakfast room with appliances and French doors onto the rear garden. The first floor comes with three bedrooms and a family bathroom whilst the second floor has the master bedroom with en-suite. Outside: the garden, approximately 25ft in length x 23ft wide, will be landscaped with an allocated parking space for one car. LOCATION The location gives excellent access to the M1 motorway (Junction 15a/16) and the A14, A1/M1 link road to the north and the M40 to the south west. Northampton Castle Station is only a short distance away with direct trains to London Euston with journey times of around one hour. Within the village of Duston there are numerous shops and amenities and Northampton Town centre offers more comprehensive amenities. The property is located on the edge of Duston and close to the Althorp Estate and Harlestone Firs. There are water sports to be found at Pitsford Res ervoir, golf at Collingtree Park, Chapel Brampton and Church Brampton and both primary and secondary schooling close by within the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbourhood Environmental Services
    Cabinet Member Report for Regeneration, Enterprise and Planning Northampton Borough Council 2nd March 2015 Regeneration The economic and physical regeneration of Northampton was one of this Administration’s key priorities on taking control of the Borough Council in 2011. All of the projects below have benefitted the residents of Northampton by generating inward investment, improving skills, modernising transportation links, creating more incentives for people to visit and generally supporting business in our town to create jobs and a thriving local economy. Project Angel Plans were approved in May 2014 to transform derelict land in the heart of Northampton into a new iconic headquarters and office building for Northamptonshire County Council, saving tax payers millions of pounds and generating a massive cash injection to the town centre economy. The building is due to open in autumn 2016 and bring 2,000 workers back into the town centre and the sod cutting ceremony took place on 10th February. University of Northampton In 2012, the University of Northampton announced plans to build a new single-site campus in the Enterprise Zone to capitalise on the links with research and innovation in technology. Plans were approved in July 2014 and the new campus is due to open in 2018. Work commenced in December 2013 on a new Innovation Centre opposite the Railway Station which will provide premises for up to 60 small and start-up businesses and enhance the Enterprise Zone offer for the town. The Innovation Centre will open this spring. In March 2014 the new Halls of Residence opened at St John’s bringing 464 students to live in the town centre and making Northampton a true University town Sixfields The Administration worked with Northampton Town Football Club to facilitate the redevelopment of Sixfields Stadium and the surrounding area with a £12 million loan deal which was announced in July 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • DELAPRE from Medieval Nunnery to Modern Public Park, Delapre Has a Rich and Varied History
    DELAPRE From medieval nunnery to modern public park, Delapre has a rich and varied history. Lying within a stone’s throw of Northampton’s busy town centre, the varied paths and trails detailed in this leaflet will lead you via parkland and woods, village streets and ancient buildings, back in time to a medieval world of royalty, religion and war. Delapre Lake DELAPRE Lying on the southern boundary of Northampton, Delapre & Hardingstone Delapre, with its 550 acres of parkland and gardens, has a * long and eventful history. From its beginnings as a Cluniac nunnery, Delapre was destined to become the temporary resting place of an English Queen, a War of the Roses battlefield, an 18th century country house and park, a 20th century home for Northamptonshire records ... until finally it became an attractive public park and home to Delapre Golf Complex. Delapre Park is approximately one mile, and Hardingstone HARDINGSTONE less than three miles from Northampton town centre. Lying on the outskirts of Northampton, Hardingstone’s For information about public transport to Delapre and ironstone and brick buildings are typical of many Hardingstone, please contact Traveline on 0870 608 2608. Northamptonshire villages. Many of the brick terraced Car parking is available at Delapre Abbey (approach via the houses in the High Street were built by the Bouverie driveway from London Road) and south of Delapre Lake Queen Eleanor’s Cross family (owners of Delapre Abbey from 1764 to 1946). (via the Delapre Golf Complex turnoff from the A45). Also in the High Street is the parish church of St. Edmund If you wish to report any problems with any of the routes 10 .
    [Show full text]
  • Northampton Heritage Open Days 2019 Coordinated by Northampton Borough Council and Supported by Northampton Town Centre BID
    Northampton Heritage Open Days 2019 Coordinated by Northampton Borough Council and supported by Northampton Town Centre BID. Further information about all participating venues Friday 13 – Sunday 15 September can be found at www.heritageopendays.org.uk St Peter’s Church @heritageopenday #HODs /heritageopendays @heritageopendays @heritageopenday #HODs /heritageopendays @heritageopendays www.heritageopendays.org.uk www.heritageopendays.org.uk Welcome to Heritage Open Days in Northampton Town Centre Venues Heritage Open Days is a national event co-ordinated locally by Northampton Borough All Saints’ Church, George Row, Northampton Council and run by volunteers who kindly give their time and expertise. It’s your chance to Friday, Saturday 9am – 6pm and Sunday 12 noon to 6pm see historic places and try out new experiences in and around the town – and best of all, it’s (services at 8am and 10.30am) completely FREE. Built in 1680 in the Wren style, the church replaces the larger This year’s event is extra special, as it marks 25 years since the start of National Heritage 11th century building which was destroyed in the 1675 Great Open Days, and Northampton has taken part every single year! Heritage Open Days in Fire of Northampton. Following the fire, King Charles II gave Northampton will run between Friday 13 and Sunday 15 September, but some venues and 1,000 tonnes of timber from his Royal forests at Salcey and attractions will remain open from 16 – 22 September as part of the extended National Rockingham to help re-build the church and his statue sits Heritage Open Days. above the carved portico to commemorate this donation.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment Appendices Biodiversity Character
    BIODIVERSITY CHARACTER ASSESSMENT APPENDICES CONTENTS APPENDIX 1 Datasets used in the Northamptonshire Biodiversity Character Assessment ................................................................. 03 APPENDIX 2 Natural Areas in Northamptonshire .............................................................................................................................................. 04 Natural Area 44. Midlands Clay Pastures ....................................................................................................................................... 04 Natural Area 45. Rockingham Forest .............................................................................................................................................. 09 Natural Area 52. West Anglian Plain ................................................................................................................................................ 14 Natural Area 54. Yardley-Whittlewood Ridge .............................................................................................................................. 20 Natural Area 55. Cotswolds ................................................................................................................................................................ 25 APPENDIX 3 Site of Special Scientifi c Interest Summaries .............................................................................................................................. 26 APPENDIX 4 Wildlife Site Summaries ....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Accounts 2017-2018
    The Wildlife Trust BCN Annual Report and Accounts 2017-2018 Some of this year’s highlights ___________________________________________________ 3 Chairman’s Introduction _______________________________________________________ 5 Strategic Report Our Five Year Plan: Better for Wildlife by 2020 _____________________________________ 6 Delivery: Wildlife Conservation __________________________________________________ 7 Delivery: Nene Valley Living Landscape _________________________________________________ 8 Delivery: Great Fen Living Landscape __________________________________________________ 10 Delivery: North Chilterns Chalk Living Landscape ________________________________________ 12 Delivery: Ouse Valley Living Landscape ________________________________________________ 13 Delivery: Living Landscapes we are maintaining & responsive on ____________________________ 14 Delivery: Beyond our living landscapes _________________________________________________ 16 Local Wildlife Sites _________________________________________________________________ 17 Planning __________________________________________________________________________ 17 Monitoring and Research ____________________________________________________________ 18 Local Environmental Records Centres __________________________________________________ 19 Land acquisition and disposal _______________________________________________________ 20 Land management for developers _____________________________________________________ 21 Reaching out - People Closer to Nature __________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • INFRASTRUCTURE SCHEDULE Transport
    Schedule of Significant Proposed Changes Section 18.0 / Appendix 4 – West Northamptonshire Infrastructure Delivery Plan – Schedule Extract INFRASTRUCTURE SCHEDULE Transport Ref Growth Infrastructure Requirement Required for Delivery Broad Cost Funding Location Growth at Body Phasing Est. Sources Northampton T1 NRDA A45/M1 Northampton Growth NRDA NCC/HA 2014 £12.24m Developer Management Scheme* (see table below) start T2 Northampton North West Bypass Phase 1 (A428 to Northampton Developer 2014 £11.3m Developer (West) Grange Farm) Kings Heath start T3 Northampton North West Bypass Phase 2 (Grange Northampton NCC/ 2021 £16.3m Developer (West) Farm to A5199) (West) Developer start T4 Northampton Sandy Lane Relief Road Phase 2 Norwood Farm Developer 2016 £5.42m Developer (West) related to Upton Lodge Norwood Farm /Upton Lodge developments T5 NRDA New Bus Interchange at Northampton Wider Area NBC 2013 £10m WNDC/ Town Centre start NBC T6 NRDA New Railway Transport Interchange at Wider Area Network 2014 £30m WNDC/ Northampton Castle Station Rail start NCC T7 Northampton Kingsthorpe Corridor Improvements Northampton NCC 2010 £3.8m NCC/ (West) (West) start Developer T8 NRDA Highway and Junction Improvements to Northampton NCC 2013 £1.2m NCC/NBC/ provide access to developments in the Town Centre - Developer St John’s area. St John’s Area T9 NRDA Plough Junction Improvements Northampton St NCC 2015 £3m Grant John’s Area Funded T10 NRDA Ransome Road Nunn Mills Link Road Avon Nunn Mills NCC/ 2014 £17.6m WNDC/ Developer start Developer T11 NRDA London Road Ransome Road Junction Avon Nunn Mills NCC 2011 £2.3m WNDC/ Schedule of Significant Proposed Changes Section 18.0 / Appendix 4 – West Northamptonshire Infrastructure Delivery Plan – Schedule Extract Ref Growth Infrastructure Requirement Required for Delivery Broad Cost Funding Location Growth at Body Phasing Est.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Recommendations on the New Electoral Arrangements for Northamptonshire County Council
    Draft recommendations on the new electoral arrangements for Northamptonshire County Council Electoral review June 2012 Translations and other formats For information on obtaining this publication in another language or in a large-print or Braille version please contact the Local Government Boundary Commission for England: Tel: 020 7664 8534 Email: [email protected] The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Local Government Boundary Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 100049926 2012 Contents Summary 1 1 Introduction 3 2 Analysis and draft recommendations 5 Submissions received 6 Electorate figures 6 Council size 6 Electoral fairness 8 General analysis 8 Electoral arrangements 9 Corby Borough 10 Daventry District 11 East Northamptonshire District 12 Kettering Borough 14 Northampton Borough 16 South Northamptonshire District 18 Borough of Wellingborough 20 Conclusions 21 Parish electoral arrangements 22 3 What happens next? 25 4 Mapping 27 Appendices A Glossary and abbreviations 28 B Table B1: Draft recommendations for Northamptonshire 31 County Council Summary The Local Government Boundary Commission for England is an independent body which conducts electoral reviews of local authority areas. The broad purpose of an electoral review is to decide on the appropriate electoral arrangements – the number of councillors, and the names, number and boundaries of wards or divisions – for a specific local authority. We are conducting an electoral review of Northamptonshire County Council to provide improved levels of electoral equality across the authority.
    [Show full text]