DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Spaces Open Minds Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Spaces Open Minds Report Local Spaces: Open Minds Inspirational ideas for managing lowland commons and other green spaces An Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Published by the Chilterns Conservation Board in March 2015 Local Spaces: Open Minds Inspirational ideas for managing lowland commons and other green spaces o CONSERVATION BOARD HITCHIN The M1 Chilterns Area of DUNSTABLE LUTON Outstanding Natural AYLESBURY Beauty TRING HARPENDEN WENDOVER HEMEL BERKHAMSTED HEMPSTEAD PRINCES RISBOROUGH CHESHAM M25 CHINNOR M40 M1 STOKENCHURCH AMERSHAM CHORLEYWOOD WATLINGTON HIGH BENSON WYCOMBE BEACONSFIELD MARLOW WALLINGFORD M40 N River Thames M25 0 5 10 km HENLEY-ON-THAMES GORING M4 0 6 miles M4 READING Acknowledgements The Chilterns Conservation Board is grateful to the Heritage Lottery Fund for their financial support from 2011 to 2015 which made the Chilterns Commons Project possible. We are also grateful to the project's 18 other financial partners, including the Chiltern Society. Finally, we would like to pay special tribute to Rachel Sanderson who guided the project throughout and to Glyn Kuhn whose contribution in time and design expertise helped to ensure the completion of the publication. Photographs: Front cover main image – Children at Swyncombe Downs by Chris Smith Back cover main image – Sledging on Peppard Common by Clive Ormonde Small images from top to bottom – Children at home in nature by Alistair Will Hazel dormouse courtesy of redorbit.com Orange hawkweed by Clive Ormonde Grazing herd, Brill Common by Roger Stone Discovering trees on a local nature reserve by Alistair Will Local Spaces: Open Minds Determining and setting out a future for key areas of open space, like the 200 commons Preface scattered across the Chilterns, is essential, but a daunting challenge for any individual. However, commons and open spaces are areas for collective action. Whilst many people will recognize their value and importance, that does not make the task of securing a sustainable future for them any easier. The value of such places can be quantified in many ways; it might be their importance for health activities such as walking, riding or cycling, or more peaceful activities such as enjoying fresh air. The cultural and historical importance of these places has been explored in the companion book – Our Common Heritage. The biodiversity value of these places is well known but none of these attributes alone will ensure that these dispersed areas remain 'local open spaces'. Moreover, if you add all of these together you would not reach their true value. Imagine, if you can, that they are not there, and instead a housing estate or enclosed farmland or even an industrial estate takes their place. What would you have lost? Don't worry, this is not going to happen as legislation protects commons – but, more importantly, the people who have read and acted on the ideas set out in this book will ensure that commons and other local spaces remain open, used and treasured for generations to come. This set of reports looks to the future and provides a refreshing look at how commons and open spaces can be enjoyed, treasured and valued. But it goes further than that because it offers some real insight into the key challenges facing commons across the south of England which are no longer in agricultural management. Each report encourages us to have an open mind about these local spaces, not to preserve them as they are, or as we think they should be, but to make them the centre of a thriving and buzzing community; places to explore and be creative, to bring meaning to our increasingly sedentary lives. Such places should not be managed from afar by people who have little or no local connection, nor lack the funds for management because of constraints on the public purse because the vital knowledge, skills, creativeness and determination all exist within the Chilterns. The overall theme of the five reports is to bring a new meaning to these local spaces by extending the current experiences and showing what might be possible. Local spaces, like the 200 commons in the Chilterns, have survived many struggles and perils, and they still need to. The challenges for the 21st century in areas like the Chilterns is neglect, not abandonment, because these places are 'used' and in many ways 'valued'. However, the management they receive is often not local enough or sufficiently linked in to the life of the community. They are shared spaces and this requires us to work alongside other people in our community – and that is a very good thing with many benefits. Natural The first report, Natural Neighbourhoods, sets out on this journey by using examples from Neighbourhoods across the country of specific programmes that can help communities develop new ideas to help all take ownership of local spaces in a positive way. This rethink around local spaces is especially important for those with poor health and low levels of social interaction as they benefit most from access to high quality local open spaces. Where these interactions take place, the results can be transformative. In the past, common land has kept those most in need alive and provided a backbone to society. There is no reason why it should not do so again. Local Spaces: Open Minds Page 1 Nature’s In Nature's Classrooms, Alistair Will sets out a challenge to all. While there is a great deal Classrooms of opportunity to be outdoors, much of this activity is organised and many do little informal exercise. Local spaces, especially commons, provide an excellent alternative classroom. The report explores potential for science and nature, as well as art, history and geography. But it need not stop there as there is no reason why maths, physics and even philosophy could not feature as well. Local open spaces are a great place for projects that often combine a range of subjects under one topic, as the case studies show, especially the discussion on barriers and 'making things happen'. A good start is to know if you have a local open space and, if so, what is on or in your local space so, if someone asks you, you are able to give an informed reply. Open Doors The use of local spaces for recreation might sound obvious, but it would be a mistake to skip over the Open Doors report by Vicky Myers. Why, when we say that we value being in the natural environment more than ever, do we have the lowest physical and mental health? Because people are less sure of what they are 'permitted' to do, connecting and promoting recreational activity has been a core thrust of the Chilterns Commons Project. This can be easily replicated as it makes sense to join up cycle routes with bike hire companies and to provide maps of various walking routes on line or via phone apps. Areas like the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, and commons in particular, will always be popular and that is a good thing; working together to enhance our enjoyment across all generations is crucial. Changing In her second report, Changing Environments, Vicky Myers looks at the state of the natural Environments environment and sets out a very convincing case as to the way the commons in the Chilterns need to be managed for nature. The climate is changing and nature, like us, needs to do adapt. However, much past human activity acts as a barrier so we need to think of these open spaces as part of a wider natural network. There is an important message here for local government and community groups as well as for us as individuals – nature needs room to breathe. Monitoring open spaces for a range of species (butterflies, newts or bumblebees) is a good indicator of the high value areas, and these are often commons. Profit or Loss In the final report, Profit or Loss, Victoria Edwards assesses the issue of funding the management of open spaces. As the other reports have made clear, management is critical to their future but it is also true that management costs in both resources and time. Finding suitable monetary arrangements to re-invest in them is therefore important. The wide range of ideas presented should be considered carefully by all. Valuing an open space according to its true worth means that people will pay if they can see that the money is re- invested back into the site management. Vigilant and persuasive people acting on behalf of the site will also make sure that any new development or similar activity has appropriate mitigation, and the open spaces within the Chilterns provide a good environment for this to take place. All of these reports, written by national experts in their respective fields, have the same aim – to re-invigorate those living in the Chilterns and further afield to think and act positively about the local spaces around them. These open spaces, especially the commons, may be small and spread widely throughout the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, but that means they are closer to their local communities and collectively are more important. For them to stay important, people need to value them, not just use them, and act to enhance them. To find out how, read on and then enjoy them all the more. Christopher Short Countryside and Community Research Institute, University of Gloucestershire and Chairman of the Foundation for Common Land Local Spaces: Open Minds Page 2 Local Spaces - Natural Neighbourhoods Duncan Mackay Ideas to help communities create healthier, happier, greener places close to where people live through traditional common land principles and the creation of new commons. Introduction: Places of human habitation within or adjacent to the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) come in all shapes and sizes from remote rural hamlets to large urban areas.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Newsletter Index May 2021
    Wycombe Wildlife Group (WWG) newsletter index (Revised 26 May 2021) Wycombe Wildlife Group has produced a newsletter 3 times a year since the Group was formed, initially as Wycombe Urban Wildlife Group, in 1989. Copies of all the newsletters issued have been placed on this website to provide a record of the history of the Group and some of its achievements and failures in carrying out its planned objectives. This index includes reports and articles published in the newsletters containing material relating to wildlife species and their conservation, wildlife habitats and their management, as well as listing past activities such as walks, talks and visits. The list is divided into categories to make it easier to find items on particular subjects. Each item on the list shows the number of the newsletter in which it was published.By selecting the relevant issue number from the list of issued newsletters, you can view or, if necessary, download that issue. This index will be updated following the issue of each future newsletter, and amended to take account of any changes considered necessary following the receipt of comments and/or suggested changes from members. Index of WUWG/WWG newsletter items (Revised May 2021) Group activities 24 hour Wildlife Watch Marathon (Issues 5, 6 and 24) Chair Museum wildlife garden (Issue 8) Create a Hedgerow project (Issue 34) Creation of bat hibernaculum at Booker (Issue 6) Grange Farm and Terriers Farm - fauna and flora surveys (Issue 35) Hang on to hedgerows project (Issues 30-32) Hedgehog survey (Issues 5
    [Show full text]
  • Little Ouse and Waveney Project
    Transnational Ecological Network (TEN3) Mott MacDonald Norfolk County Council Transnational Ecological Network (TEN3) Little Ouse and Waveney Project May 2006 214980-UA02/01/B - 12th May 2006 Transnational Ecological Network (TEN3) Mott MacDonald Norfolk County Council Transnational Ecological Network (TEN3) Little Ouse and Waveney Project Issue and Revision Record Rev Date Originator Checker Approver Description 13 th Jan J. For January TEN A E. Lunt 2006 Purseglove workshop 24 th May E. Lunt J. B Draft for Comment 2006 Purseglove This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any o ther project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Mott MacDonald being obtained. Mott MacDonald accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequence of this document being used for a pur pose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person using or relying on the document for such other purpose agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm his agreement to indemnify Mott MacDonald for all loss or damage re sulting therefrom. Mott MacDonald accepts no responsibility or liability for this document to any party other than the person by whom it was commissioned. To the extent that this report is based on information supplied by other parties, Mott MacDonald accepts no liability for any loss or damage suffered by the client, whether contractual or tortious, stemming from any conclusions based on data supplied by parties other than Mott MacDonald and used by Mott MacDonald in preparing this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfly Conservation Upper Thames Branch Silver-Washed Fritillary
    Butterfly Conservation Upper Thames Branch Silver-washed Fritillary Report 2006-7 Mick Campbell Many thanks to everyone who sent in sightings of Silver-washed Fritillary, in particular Chris Brown who monitored Crowsley Park Wood on a daily basis throughout the season, capturing the timing of different events, such as pairing and roosting habits of this beautiful butterfly. From the left: Silver-washed Fritillary male on bramble showing the distinctive black streaks of scent-scales near the middle of the forewing; female on buddleia; and the valezina form of the female (photos © Peter Hall, David Redhead & Tony Croft respectively) The Silver-washed Fritillary is a strong, fast flying woodland species, preferring mixed woodland with an open canopy, sunny glades and rides, with bramble as the favoured nectar source. They lay their eggs on oaks and rough-barked conifers where their foodplant of violet is present nearby. Interestingly, a report was also received from Jan Haseler in 2007 of a female appearing to oviposit on alder. Silver-washed Fritillary has been expanding its range in recent years and in the hot summer of 2006 it was particularly successful, with ‘wanderers’ turning up in 12 gardens, compared with 3 sightings in gardens during the 2007 season. First sighting Last sighting Number seen 2006 22-Jun-06 24-Aug-06 389 2007 17-Jun-07 07-Sept-07 306 As this species has a very long flight period, the peak emergence is difficult to pinpoint, but the maximum numbers are counted from about 11th July through to 10th August, with the first females being noted 2-3 weeks after the first male is sighted.
    [Show full text]
  • Festival of Nature
    MK Festival of Nature 1-8 July 2017 A special week-long programme of activities to celebrate the beautiful and inspiring nature found in Milton Keynes’ green space. www.MKfestivalofnature.org Berkshir #MKFoN Buck Oxfordshiringhamshire e e Milton Keynes Natural History Society Discover the great outdoors in our green city With over 5,000 acres of beautiful parks, woodlands and lakes to explore, you’re never far from nature. The Parks Trust is an independent, self-funded charity and we care for and maintain the green space across Milton Keynes. We ensure these spaces are expertly maintained and managed and we also plan, develop and invest for the future, so that everyone can enjoy the outdoors, now and forever. • Over 200 annual events from Proms in Campbell Park to World Picnic, organised runs to led walks – there’s something for everyone Discover your parks, check out upcoming • Outdoor learning and education for all ages events, read a little more about us and fi nd • Parties and exploring for adventurers big and small out how you can volunteer on our website at • Watersports and aquatic fun • Volunteering opportunities www.theparkstrust.com Everyone is welcome See you there! 2 14730 PAR_General-Advert_A4 (12) JS.indd 1 16/11/2016 16:24 Welcome Welcome to our guide to Milton Keynes’ frst ever festival of nature. Organised in partnership by The Parks Trust, Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Wildlife Trust and Milton Keynes Natural History Society, the Festival of Nature is a celebration of the fascinating and varied nature that can be found across the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildberkshire, Buckinghamshire & Oxfordshire
    Winter 2020 Berkshire, Buckinghamshire Wild & Oxfordshire FARMING FOR WILDLIFE The truly green revolution poised to speed nature’s recovery WHAT’S IN A NAME? The magical relationship between language and nature WINTER WILDLIFE Heroic hedges Discover the wildlife that thrives in our hedgerows Farming and wildlife HAMBLIN/2020VISION MARK Welcome 10 They are compatible! Your wild winter Ready for nature’s recovery The best of the season’s wildlife and The pandemic continues, but with talk of a ‘green where to enjoy it on your local patch recovery’ there could yet be a silver lining that puts people and the environment first. These are unprecedented times and with the RIC MELLIS RIC Agriculture and Environment Bills currently making their way back through Parliament, nature’s recovery now rests in the hands 3 Wintertime wonders of politicians. We have been fighting hard alongside other Wildlife Trusts Wildlife wows this winter to ensure that the bold promises made on securing a future for wildlife come to fruition. We continue to lobby for the best possible outcome. Thank you The Agriculture Bill could transform our countryside. BBOWT will We achieve more by working facilitate this truly green revolution at the local level, offering the as one. Your membership helps expertise and vision for a landscape rich in wildlife, for all to enjoy. In fact, fund vital conservation and we’ve already started and this autumn launched our new Land Advice campaign work that protects vulnerable birds. Discover what Service to help farmers and landowners manage their land in a more else we are achieving together nature-minded way.
    [Show full text]
  • T1)E Bedford,1)Ire Naturaii,T 45
    T1)e Bedford,1)ire NaturaIi,t 45 Journal for the year 1990 Bedfordshire Natural History Society 1991 'ISSN 0951 8959 I BEDFORDSHffiE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY 1991 Chairman: Mr D. Anderson, 88 Eastmoor Park, Harpenden, Herts ALS 1BP Honorary Secretary: Mr M.C. Williams, 2 Ive! Close, Barton-le-Clay, Bedford MK4S 4NT Honorary Treasurer: MrJ.D. Burchmore, 91 Sundon Road, Harlington, Dunstable, Beds LUS 6LW Honorary Editor (Bedfordshire Naturalist): Mr C.R. Boon, 7 Duck End Lane, Maulden, Bedford MK4S 2DL Honorary Membership Secretary: Mrs M.]. Sheridan, 28 Chestnut Hill, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, Beds LU7 7TR Honorary Scientific Committee Secretary: Miss R.A. Brind, 46 Mallard Hill, Bedford MK41 7QS Council (in addition to the above): Dr A. Aldhous MrS. Cham DrP. Hyman DrD. Allen MsJ. Childs Dr P. Madgett MrC. Baker Mr W. Drayton MrP. Soper Honorary Editor (Muntjac): Ms C. Aldridge, 9 Cowper Court, Markyate, Herts AL3 8HR Committees appointed by Council: Finance: Mr]. Burchmore (Sec.), MrD. Anderson, Miss R. Brind, Mrs M. Sheridan, Mr P. Wilkinson, Mr M. Williams. Scientific: Miss R. Brind (Sec.), Mr C. Boon, Dr G. Bellamy, Mr S. Cham, Miss A. Day, DrP. Hyman, MrJ. Knowles, MrD. Kramer, DrB. Nau, MrE. Newman, Mr A. Outen, MrP. Trodd. Development: Mrs A. Adams (Sec.), MrJ. Adams (Chairman), Ms C. Aldridge (Deputy Chairman), Mrs B. Chandler, Mr M. Chandler, Ms]. Childs, Mr A. Dickens, MrsJ. Dickens, Mr P. Soper. Programme: MrJ. Adams, Mr C. Baker, MrD. Green, MrD. Rands, Mrs M. Sheridan. Trustees (appointed under Rule 13): Mr M. Chandler, Mr D. Green, Mrs B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reading Naturalist
    The Reading Naturalist No. 53 Published by the Reading and District Natural History Society 2001 Price to Non Members £2.50 T H E R E A D I N G N A T U R A L I S T No 53 for the year 2000 The Journal of the Reading and District Natural History Society President Mr Rod d’Ayala Honorary General Secretary Mrs Catherine Butcher Honorary Editor Dr Malcolm Storey Editorial Sub-committee The Editor, Dr Alan Brickstock, Mrs Linda Carter, Mr Hugh H. Carter Miss June M. V. Housden, Mr David G. Notton Honorary Recorders Botany: Mrs Linda Carter, Fungi: Dr Alan Brickstock Entomology: Mr David G. Notton Invertebates other than insects: Mr Hugh H. Carter Vertebrates: Mr Hugh H. Carter CONTENTS Obituary 1 Members’ Observations 1 Excursions Meryl Beek 2 Wednesday Afternoon Walks Alan Brickstock 5 Meetings (1999-2000) Catherine Butcher 6 The Fishlock Prize 7 Membership Norman Hall 8 Presidential address: Some Mycological Ramblings Alan Brickstock 9 Natural History Services provided at the Museum of Reading David G. Notton 13 A Mutant Foxglove Malcolm Storey 16 Sehirus dubius (or should that be dubious!) Chris Raper 17 Hartslock – a Local Success Story Chris Raper 17 Recorders’ Reports Malcolm Storey 19 “RDB” and “N” status – The Jargon Explained Rod d’Ayala 19 Recorder’s Report for Botany 2000 Linda Carter 20 The New Berkshire Flora Malcolm Storey 23 Recorder’s Report for Mycology 2000 Alan Brickstock 24 Recorder’s Report for Entomology 2000 David G. Notton 27 Recorder’s Report for Invertebrates other than insects 2000 Hugh H.
    [Show full text]
  • Beetles of Hertfordshire – Corrections and Amendments, with an Update on Additional Species, and Other Important New Records Trevor J
    Lepidoptera (butterfl ies): Andrew Wood, 93 Hertfordshire Environmental Records Centre, Bengeo Street, Hertford, SG14 3EZ; Tel: 01992- Grebe House, St Michael’s Street, St Albans, AL3 4SN, 503571; email: [email protected] and records Tel: 01727 858901; email: [email protected] via www. hertsmiddx-butterfl ies.org.uk/recording- new.php A big thank you to Trevor James and Rev Tom Gladwin for an enormous recording eff ort for the Hymenoptera (Formicidae; ants): Phil Attewell, County over many years. Trevor is taking a step 69 Thornbury Gardens, Borehamwood, WD6 1RD; back but still involved with the fl ora. He remains the email: [email protected] recorder for Beetles. Many thanks to our new recorders for taking on Hymenoptera (bees and wasps), millipedes groups this past year. Drs Ian Denholm and Alla and centipedes: Stephen Lings Email: lings24@ Mashanova will be managing the fl ora,David Willis btinternet.com the arachnids and Stephen Lings the bees, wasps, millipedes and centipedes. There are still a number of Coleoptera (beetles – general): Trevor James, 56 vacancies for particular groups. If anyone has some Back Street, Ashwell, Baldock, SG7 5PE; Tel: 01462 expertise/interest in any of the groups below or any 742684; email: [email protected] groups not currently covered within Hertfordshire, please contact the Chair of the Biological Recorders, Dr Coleoptera (water beetles): Stuart Warrington, 8 Ronni Edmonds-Brown, Department of Biological and Redwoods, Welwyn Garden City, AL8 7NR; Tel: 01707 Environmental Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, 885676; email: stuart.warrington@ nationaltrust.org. Hatfi eld, AL10 9AB Email: v.r.edmonds-brown@herts.
    [Show full text]
  • MK Landscape Sensitivity Study to Residential Development
    October 2016 Landscape Sensitivity Study to Residential Development in the Borough of Milton Keynes and Adjoining Areas FINAL Landscape Sensitivity Study to Residential Development in the Borough of Milton Keynes and Adjoining Areas 1 St John’s Square Final Report London, EC1M 4DH T: +44 (0)207 253 2929 Prepared by Gillespies LLP F: +44 (0)207 253 3900 October 2016 www.gillespies.co.uk Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Methodology 5 3 Identification of Development Model and Landscape Attributes 8 4 Susceptibility Criteria 8 5 Assessment of Landscape Sensitivity to Residential Development 10 6 Landscape Assessments 11 INTRODUCTION 1. Introduction 1.1.1 Milton Keynes Council (MKC) is currently developing 1.1.3 The main aims of this study are; a new Local Plan. Planning to meet housing need will be a key part of Plan:MK. This is to comply with the requirement in the To assess the sensitivity of the 30 landscape areas around National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) (Paragraph 14) that Milton Keynes, Newport Pagnell, Woburn Sands and Olney to residential development Local Plans should met objectively-assessed needs unless any adverse impacts of doing so would significantly and demonstrably To identify where particular land areas may have greater or outweigh the benefits, or that specific policies in the NPPF indicate less capacity for residential development that development should be restricted. In assessing potential site options, the NPPF states that ‘allocations of land for development should prefer land of less environmental value’ (Paragraph 17). The Local Plan should bring forward allocations which are consistent with these various requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment Appendices Biodiversity Character
    BIODIVERSITY CHARACTER ASSESSMENT APPENDICES CONTENTS APPENDIX 1 Datasets used in the Northamptonshire Biodiversity Character Assessment ................................................................. 03 APPENDIX 2 Natural Areas in Northamptonshire .............................................................................................................................................. 04 Natural Area 44. Midlands Clay Pastures ....................................................................................................................................... 04 Natural Area 45. Rockingham Forest .............................................................................................................................................. 09 Natural Area 52. West Anglian Plain ................................................................................................................................................ 14 Natural Area 54. Yardley-Whittlewood Ridge .............................................................................................................................. 20 Natural Area 55. Cotswolds ................................................................................................................................................................ 25 APPENDIX 3 Site of Special Scientifi c Interest Summaries .............................................................................................................................. 26 APPENDIX 4 Wildlife Site Summaries ....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 90
    WYCOMBE and SOUTH BUCKS WILDLIFE NEWS Registered Charity SEPTEMBER 2019 No: 1075175 It was mentioned in the last newsletter that the rare Yellow Bird’s Nest (Monotropa hypopitys) grows in Lambridge Wood. This photograph of that species was taken there on 28 July 2019. Wycombe Wildlife News is published 3 times Issue 90 a year to promote the Group and wildlife Contents include: issues, and inform members and the public of its activities. Walk to Munces Wood and Hollyhill Wood 51 Visit to Sands Bank LNR 52 Edited and produced by: Roger Wilding Gomm Valley visit Walk at Moorend Common 53 Content written by Roger Wilding except where Visit to Black Park 54 shown otherwise Butterfly walk at Stoke Poges Memorial Gardens 55 Drawings and proof-reading: Frances Wilding Making space for invertebrates 56 A possible interesting new local plant Photographs: Roger Wilding recording project The results of a change of grassland Printed by: Greens, Lincoln Rd, High Wycombe management 57 Garden tweets 58 Views expressed in this newsletter are those of the Other reported wildlife observations around authors and not necessarily those of the Group. our area 59 Your Group needs you 60 For the purposes of management of the Group, membership information is held on computer. Editorial lthough our newsletter is only published three times year, the time for Apreparing another issue always seems to come round so quickly. It has been my practice until now to include the copy date for the next issue on the front Wycombe Wildlife page of each newsletter and I have always waited until that date before writing Group is a registered any reports or articles, in the hope that someone else will submit something for charity with the inclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Common Ground
    Finding common ground Integrating local and national interests on commons: guidance for assessing the community value of common land Downley Common in the Buckinghamshire Chilterns. About this report This work was commissioned by Natural England and funded through its Ma- jor Project on Common Land. The objective of the work, as given in the work specification, is to identify mechanisms to recognise and take account of local community interests on commons, hence complementing established criteria used in assessing national importance of land for interests such as nature con- servation and landscape. The intention is not that community interests should be graded or weighed and balanced against national interests, but rather that they should be given proper recognition and attention when considering man- agement on a common, seeking to integrate local and national aspirations within management frameworks. Specifically, the purpose of the commission was to provide information to enable the user or practitioner to: i be aware of issues relating to the community interests of common land, ii assess the importance of common land to local neighbourhoods, iii engage with communities and understand their perspectives, iv incorporate community concerns in any scheme examining the future and management of commons. The advice and views presented in this report are entirely those of the Open Spaces Society and its officers. About the authors This report is produced for Natural England by Kate Ashbrook and Nicola Hodgson of the Open Spaces Society. Kate Ashbrook BSc Kate has been general secretary (chief executive) of the Open Spaces Society since 1984. She was a member of the Common Land Forum (1983-6), and the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions’ advisory group on the good practice guide to managing commons (1997-8).
    [Show full text]