DOCSLIB.ORG

Food Systems for Healthier Diets in Nigeria

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Food Systems for Healthier Diets in Nigeria IFPRI Discussion Paper 02018 May 2021 Food Systems for Healthier Diets in Nigeria A Research Agenda Busie Maziya-Dixon, Thom Achterbosch, Delana Adelekan, Olutayo Adeyemi, Victor Ajieroh, Dare Akerele, Adebayo Akinola, Emmanuel Alamu, Siemen van Berkum, Kendra Byrd, Aafke Nijhuis, Makuachukwu Ojide, Adeyinka Onabolu, Johnson Onyibe, Ireen Raaijmakers, Folake Samuel, Harriette Snoek, Adekunle M. Yusuf, and Inge D. Brouwer CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (A4NH) INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), a CGIAR Research Center established in 1975, provides research-based policy solutions to sustainably reduce poverty and end hunger and malnutrition. IFPRI’s strategic research aims to foster a climate-resilient and sustainable food supply; promote healthy diets and nutrition for all; build inclusive and efficient markets, trade systems, and food industries; transform agricultural and rural economies; and strengthen institutions and governance. Gender is integrated in all the Institute’s work. Partnerships, communications, capacity strengthening, and data and knowledge management are essential components to translate IFPRI’s research from action to impact. The Institute’s regional and country programs play a critical role in responding to demand for food policy research and in delivering holistic support for country-led development. IFPRI collaborates with partners around the world. AUTHORS Busie Maziya-Dixon ([email protected]) is a Senior Food and Nutrition Scientist at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) in Ibadan, Nigeria. She leads A4NH Country Coordination and Engagement Team in Nigeria. Thom Achterbosch ([email protected]) is a Senior Researcher in development economics at Wageningen University & Research in The Hague, The Netherlands. Delana Adelekan ([email protected]) is a Professor of Public Health Nutrition at the Federal University of Agriculture in Abeokuta, Nigeria. Olutayo Adeyemi ([email protected]) is an Independent Consultant, formerly of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Abuja, Nigeria. Dr. Victor Ajieroh ([email protected]) is a Senior Program Officer for Nutrition at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Country Office in Abuja, Nigeria. Dare Akerele ([email protected]) is a Senior Lecturer at the Federal University of Agriculture in Abeokuta, Nigeria. Adebayo Akinola ([email protected]) is a Professor in the Department of Agricultural Economics at the Obafemi Awolowo University in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Emmanuel Alamu ([email protected]) is an Associate Scientist at International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Southern Africa Research and Administration Hub (SARAH) Campus PO Box 310142, Chelstone, Lusaka 10101, Zambia. Siemen van Berkum ([email protected]) is a Senior Researcher in agricultural economics at Wageningen University & Research in Wageningen, the Netherlands. Kendra Byrd ([email protected]) is a Nutrition Scientist at WorldFish in Malaysia. Aafke Nijhuis is a former research assistant at Wageningen University & Research in Wageningen, the Netherlands. Makuachukwu Ojide ([email protected]) is a Lecturer in the Department of Economics & Development Studies at Alex Ekwueme Federal University in Abakaliki, Nigeria. Adeyinka Onabolu ([email protected]) is a Senior Advisor on Food Security and Nutrition to the Honourable Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development in Abuja, Nigeria. Johnson Onyibe ([email protected]) is a Professor of Agronomy and Director of Research and Planning at the National Agricultural Extension and Research Liaison Services (NAERLS) at Ahmadu Bello University in Zaria, Nigeria. Ireen Raaijmakers ([email protected]) is a Senior Researcher in consumer behavior at Wageningen University & Research in The Hague, the Netherlands. Folake Samuel ([email protected]) is an Associate Professor in the Department of Human Nutrition and Dietetics at the University of Ibadan in Ibadan, Nigeria. Harriette Snoek ([email protected]) is a Senior Researcher in consumer behavior at Wageningen University & Research in Wageningen, the Netherlands. Adekunle M. Yusuf ([email protected]) is a Research Associate at IITA in Ibadan, Nigeria. Inge D. Brouwer ([email protected]) is an Associate Professor in the Division of Human Nutrition and Health at Wageningen University & Research in Wageningen, the Netherlands. Notices 1 IFPRI Discussion Papers contain preliminary material and research results and are circulated in order to stimulate discussion and critical comment. They have not been subject to a formal external review via IFPRI’s Publications Review Committee. Any opinions stated herein are those of the author(s) and are not necessarily representative of or endorsed by IFPRI. 2 The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on the map(s) herein do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) or its partners and contributors. 3 Copyright remains with the authors. The authors are free to proceed, without further IFPRI permission, to publish this paper, or any revised version of it, in outlets such as journals, books, and other publications. Contents ABSTRACT iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS v ACRONYMS vi I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. DIET QUALITY AS AN ENTRY POINT 6 III. CONSUMER BEHAVIOR AND PURCHASING POWER 11 3.1. Introduction 11 3.2. Motivation 11 3.2.1. Cultural norm, beliefs and taboos 11 3.2.2. Product characteristics affecting food choices 12 3.2.3. Aspiration 13 3.3 Ability 13 3.3.1. Knowledge 14 3.3.2. Skills 14 3.4. Opportunity 15 3.4.1. Income/ purchasing power 15 3.4.2. Gender issues 16 3.4.3. Globalization and foreign influences 16 IV. FOOD ENVIRONMENT 18 4.1. Overview 18 4.2. Access to Markets 18 4.3. Promotion 20 4.4. Food Safety Regulations 21 4.5. Economic Access 22 V. FOOD SUPPLY SYSTEMS IN NIGERIA 24 5.1. Agricultural Production Subsystem 24 5.2. Storage, transport and trade subsystem 29 5.3. Food transformation subsystem 32 5.4. Food retail and provision subsystem 38 VI. DRIVERS OF FOOD SYSTEM CHANGE IN NIGERIA 41 6.1. Introduction 41 6.2. Indirect drivers of Nigeria’s food systems 41 6.2.1. Biophysical and environmental drivers 41 6.2.2. Demographic drivers 42 6.2.3. Economic drivers 46 6.2.4. Innovation and technology drivers 48 6.2.5. Increased infrastructure 50 6.2.6. Sociocultural drivers 51 6.2.7. Political drivers 53 VII. SYNERGIES AND TRADE-OFFS BETWEEN DIETS AND OTHER OUTCOMES OF FOOD SYSTEMS IN NIGERIA 60 VIII. SYNTHESIS AND THE WAY FORWARD: AN AGENDA FOR POLICY RESEARCH 63 Annex 1. Overview of Research Questions 75 References 78 Tables Table 1. Gaps in Demand and Supply of Major Food Products in Nigeria (2016 Estimate) ...................... 32 Table 2. Description of the Categories of Processed Foods ........................................................................ 34 Figures Figure 1. Framework of the High-Level Panel of Experts on Food Systems and Nutrition ......................... 5 Figure 2. Ecologies and Crops Produced in Nigeria .................................................................................. 25 Figure 3. Agro-ecologies and animal protein sources in Nigeria ............................................................... 26 Figure 4. Percentage of population in urban and rural areas of Nigeria ..................................................... 43 Figure 5. Urban population by size class of urban settlement in Nigeria ................................................... 44 ABSTRACT Malnutrition, mostly resulting from poor food, health, and care practices, is related to physiological, socioeconomic, and psychological factors and remains one of the leading causes of mortality in children under five years of age in low- and middle-income countries. Nigeria, as with many parts of the world, is experiencing a multiple malnutrition burden, where undernutrition, including micronutrient deficiencies, exists alongside overweight, obesity, and associated diet-related non-communicable diseases. Recent data show that 37 percent of children under five years of age are stunted while 68 percent suffer some degree of anaemia. Overweight and obesity are also common among adults with prevalence rate of about 33 percent. The Nigerian government embraces sustainable food system approaches in its policy and programmes to address malnutrition problems in the country. Food systems approaches take a holistic understanding of all activities and processes involved in food production, processing, storage, transportation, trade, transformation, retail, and consumption. In this paper, we identify and discuss the types of research that can support the operationalization of food systems approaches to improving the quality of diets in Nigeria. Specifically, we structured a consultative workshop with key stakeholders, reviewed the literature, and applied food systems framework to the Nigerian context. The process enabled us to identify 39 research questions crucial to: understanding how changes in food systems can lead to healthier diets; identifying and testing entry points for improving availability and effective demand for healthier food; and creating at scale a supportive policy and market environment for achieving heathier and sustainable diets in Nigeria. Keywords: food systems, diet quality, consumer behavior, food environment,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gericht Entscheidungsdatum Geschäftszahl Spruch Text
    01.02.2018 Gericht BVwG Entscheidungsdatum 01.02.2018 Geschäftszahl I404 2177694-1 Spruch I404 2177694-1/5E IM NAMEN DER REPUBLIK! Das Bundesverwaltungsgericht hat durch die Richterin MMag. Alexandra JUNKER als Einzelrichterin über die Beschwerde von XXXX StA. NIGERIA, vertreten durch: RA Edward W. DAIGNEAULT gegen den Bescheid des BFA, Regionaldirektion Steiermark (BAG), vom 19.08.2017, Zl. 1085882908-151266702, nach Durchführung einer mündlichen Verhandlung am 23.01.2018 zu Recht erkannt: A) Die Beschwerde wird als unbegründet abgewiesen. B) Die Revision ist gemäß Art. 133 Abs. 4 B-VG nicht zulässig. Text ENTSCHEIDUNGSGRÜNDE: I. Verfahrensgang: 1. Der Beschwerdeführer stellte am 04.09.2015 einen Antrag auf Internationalen Schutz. Im Rahmen seiner Erstbefragung durch Organe des öffentlichen Sicherheitsdienstes am 05.09.2015 gab er als Fluchtgrund an, dass er homosexuell sei und man in Nigeria deshalb verfolgt und umgebracht werde. 2. Am 09.08.2017 wurde der Beschwerdeführer vor dem Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl, Regionaldirektion Oberösterreich (in der Folge: belangte Behörde), niederschriftlich einvernommen. Im Rahmen seiner Befragung gab er an, dass er in Enugu aufgewachsen und zur Schule gegangen sei. Er habe die Schule 1997 oder 1998 beendet und dann noch für einige Zeit seinen Eltern auf der Farm geholfen. Dann sei er irgendwann zu seiner Schwester und deren Mann nach Lagos gegangen, das sei auch schon vor langer Zeit gewesen, er könne sich nicht mehr erinnern, wann er nach Lagos gegangen sei. Seine Ausreise habe er von Enugu aus angetreten, er sei zuerst nach Lagos und dann weiter in den Norden des Landes gegangen. Es sei vor langer Zeit gewesen.
    [Show full text]
  • Twitter and Millennial Participation in Voting During Nigeria's 2015 Presidential Elections
    Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2021 Twitter and Millennial Participation in Voting During Nigeria's 2015 Presidential Elections Deborah Zoaka Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the Public Administration Commons, and the Public Policy Commons Walden University College of Social and Behavioral Sciences This is to certify that the doctoral dissertation by Deborah Zoaka has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Lisa Saye, Committee Chairperson, Public Policy and Administration Faculty Dr. Raj Singh, Committee Member, Public Policy and Administration Faculty Dr. Christopher Jones, University Reviewer, Public Policy and Administration Faculty Chief Academic Officer and Provost Sue Subocz, Ph.D. Walden University 2021 Abstract Twitter and Millennial Participation in Voting during Nigeria’s 2015 Presidential Elections by Deborah Zoaka MPA Walden University, 2013 B.Sc. Maiduguri University, 1989 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Public Policy and Administration Walden University May, 2021 Abstract This qualitative phenomenological research explored the significance of Twitter in Nigeria’s media ecology within the context of its capabilities to influence the millennial generation to participate in voting during the 2015 presidential election. Millennial participation in voting has been abysmally low since 1999, when democratic governance was restored in Nigeria after 26 years of military rule, constituting a grave threat to democratic consolidation and electoral legitimacy. The study was sited within the theoretical framework of Democratic participant theory and the uses and gratifications theory.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Speaker Bios
    BORLAUG SUMMER INSTITUTE ON GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY SPEAKER BIOS Philip Abbott Dr. Philip Abbott is a professor in the Department of Agricultural Economics at Purdue University. He teaches courses on mathematical programming, international trade, trade policy and agricultural development, macroeconomics and mathematical economics. His current research focuses on international trade and international agricultural development, and four of his students have won national awards for the quality of their dissertations. Phil has consulted for several domestic and foreign government agencies, including the United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization. He has been on the editorial boards of the American Journal of Agricultural Economics and the Journal of Development Economics. In addition, Phil has published numerous articles and studies. Recent publications include studies on Tariff Rate Quotas, Globalization, Wheat-Importing State Agricultural Commodity Production and Trade, Implications of Game Theory for International Agricultural Trade, American Journal of Agricultural Economics. He has been on the editorial boards of the American Journal of Agricultural Economics and the Journal of Development Economics. Notably he also serves on numerous committees including The International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium and The USDA–USTR Agricultural Technical Advisory Committee for Trade in Grains, Feeds and Oilseeds. Jay Akridge Dr. Jay T Akridge was appointed Dean of the Purdue University College of Agriculture in 2009. As dean he is responsible for administering academic programs in the College of Agriculture, the Indiana Agricultural Experiment Station, the Purdue Cooperative Extension Service and a number of state regulatory services. Prior to being named dean, Dr. Akridge was the James and Lois Ackerman Professor of Agricultural Economics at Purdue and served as director of the Center for Food and Agricultural Business and the MS-MBA in food and agribusiness management program.
    [Show full text]
  • Norman Borlaug
    Norman Borlaug Melinda Smale, Michigan State University I’d like to offer some illustrative examples of how scientific partnerships and exchange of plant genetic resources in international agricultural research have generated benefits for US farmers and consumers. 1. It is widely accepted that the greatest transformation in world agriculture of the last century was the Green Revolution, which averted famine particularly in the wheat and rice-growing areas of numerous countries in Asia by boosting levels of farm productivity several times over, lowering prices for consumers, raising income and demand for goods and services. Most of us here are familiar with the history of this transformation. • You will remember that the key technological impetus was short- statured varieties that were fertilizer responsive and didn’t fall over in the field when more of the plant’s energy was poured into grain rather than the stalk and leaves. • Less well known is that the origin of the genes that conferred short- stature in wheat was a landrace from Korea--transferred to Japan, named Daruma, and bred into Norin 10. Norin 10 was named for a Japanese research station, tenth selection from a cross. Later, Norin 10 was brought as a seed sample by an agronomist advisor who served in the MacArthur campaign after WWII. At Washington State University it was crossed to produce important US wheat varieties. The most extensive use of Norin 10 genes outside Japan and the US was by Norman Borlaug, who won the 1970 Nobel Peace Prize. He was the founder of the World Food Prize (won, for example, by Gebisa Ejeta).
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Report on Women and Men in Nigeria
    2018 STATISTICAL REPORT ON WOMEN AND MEN IN NIGERIA NATIONAL BUREAU OF STATISTICS MAY 2019 i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ ii PREFACE ...................................................................................................................................... vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ ix LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... xiii LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... xv LIST OF ACRONYMS................................................................................................................ xvi CHAPTER 1: POPULATION ....................................................................................................... 1 Key Findings ................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 A. General Population Patterns ................................................................................................ 1 1. Population and Growth Rate ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Payoff to Investing in Cgiar Research
    THE PAYOFF TO INVESTING IN CGIAR RESEARCH October 2020 (revised) Julian M. Alston, Philip G. Pardey, and Xudong Rao >>> Table of Contents KEY FINDINGS I What motivated us I What we did I What we found III Implications of our findings V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY VIII THE PAYOFF TO INVESTING IN CGIAR RESEARCH 1 1. Introduction 2 1.1 Report Roadmap 6 CONTEXT FOR THE ASSESSMENT 7 2. Evolving Structure of Global Agriculture, Agricultural R&D, and the CGIAR 8 2.1 Global Perspectives on Food, Agriculture, and R&D 8 2.2 The Global Incidence of Hunger and Poverty 11 2.3 The (Economic) Geography of Agriculture and Food Production 13 2.4 The (Economic) Geography of Agricultural and Food R&D Spending 15 Rising private-sector presence 17 Agricultural R&D versus total R&D 17 CGIAR spending 18 3. CGIAR Research Institutions and Investments 20 3.1 A Potted (Economic and Institutional) History of the CGIAR 20 Funding history 20 CGIAR spending breakdowns 23 3.2 Sources of Support for CGIAR Research 26 3.3 Previous Evaluation Reports 30 THE RETURNS TO CGIAR RESEARCH 34 4. Concepts, Methods, Measures and Data for the Analysis 35 4.1 Concepts and Challenges 35 4.2 Overview of the Evidence 36 4.3 Standardizing the ROR Metric 37 4.4 Selecting Data for the Analysis: Filtering 39 <<< 5. Evidence on the Returns to Investments in CGIAR Research 43 5.1 Distribution of Estimated BCRs 44 5.2 Regression Analysis 47 5.3 The BCR for CGIAR research 50 6. The Benefits From Investments in CGIAR Research 53 6.1 Scaling ROR Evidence: From BCRs to Benefits 53 6.2 Directly Estimated Benefits 58 6.3 Ground-Truthing Benefits 64 The (approximate) value of productivity growth 64 Simple approximate benefit-cost ratios 67 6.4 Reservations About the ROR Evidence 69 7.
    [Show full text]
  • BOKO HARAM NOTE N° 246 - Fondation Jean-Jaurès - 10 Février 2015 REGIONAL ISSUES AROUND the UPRISING Marc-Antoine Pérouse De Montclos*
    BOKO HARAM NOTE n° 246 - Fondation Jean-Jaurès - 10 février 2015 REGIONAL ISSUES AROUND THE UPRISING Marc-Antoine Pérouse de Montclos* *Associate Fellow, Africa hile the African Union plans to mobilise more than 8,000 men from Nigeria, Programme, Chatham Chad, Cameroon and Benin to fight Boko Haram, the following analysis House, London W focuses on the regional issues surrounding the crisis. The aim is not to concentrate on the origins or the social dimension of the sect; these have already been dealt with in field studies and secondary sources1. In a first part, the analysis shows that Boko Haram has been present in Niger, Chad and Cameroon ever since its birth in Maiduguri, in the Borno region, around 2002. Regarding territory, it also shows that we are not looking at an expansion of its area of control, but of its field of military actions since the armies of countries neighbouring Nigeria got involved in operations to erase the sect. In fact, the growing involvement of Niger, Chad and Cameroon in the fight against Jihadist terrorism has broken the mutual non-aggression pact that was in place. In an audio report dated the 6th of June 2014, Boko Haram threatened President Idriss Déby with reprisals if he was to join forces with Nigeria in their attacks on the sect. In addition to this, in an interview filmed and broadcast on the 28th of January 2015, a spokesman for the rebels stated that the group would stop attacking Niger and Chad if they stopped their offensive against the group. It appears that the international reaction to the threat of terrorism from Boko Haram could be a contributing factor in the future international expansion of a sect whose ire, until now, had been contained to Nigeria: they had not established links with a wider diaspora or coordinated efforts with other jihadist groups in the Sahel.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Card Reader and the 2015 General Elections in Nigeria
    Smart Card Reader and the 2015 General Elections in Nigeria Emmanuel Adeniran Alebiosu Department of Political Science Federal University Wukari, Nigeria [email protected] 08038436474 Abstract The real issue in the 2015 general elections in Nigeria was the use of the smart card reader. The smart card reader was a critical component in the elections. It was used for the first time in the electoral process of Nigeria and it remains one of the greatest technological innovations of the 2015 general elections. The smart card reader is a technological device setup to authenticate and verify on Election Day a Permanent Voter Card (PVC) issued by Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). The fundamental basis for the deployment of the technologically-based device by INEC was to ensure a credible, transparent, free and fair election in order to deepen Nigeria’s democracy. However, the use of the card reader generated debate among the election stakeholders before, during and after the 2015 general elections. One of such debates was the legality for the use of the device. This paper therefore examines the debate and the role of the card reader in the 2015 general elections. The paper also looks at the challenges and impact of the card reader on the election. The paper argued that considering the massive electoral fraud witnessed in general elections since Nigeria’s independence, the card reader should be used for future elections. Consequently, subsequent general elections in Nigeria should gradually continue to be technologically driven. Keywords: democracy, election, electoral democracy, electoral fraud, smart card reader, permanent voter card, technology 1 Introduction Election is the process of choosing a candidate for public office.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Social Management Framework Summary
    Language: English Original: English PROJECT: TECHNOLOGIES FOR AFRICAN AGRICULTURAL TRANSFORMATION COUNTRY: MULTINATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK SUMMARY Date: June 2017 Team Leader: J. N. CHIANU, Agricultural Economist, OSAN.0 Team Members: E. ATTIOGBEVI-SOMADO, Agronomist, OSAN.2 D. IHEDIOHA, Agro-Industry Specialist, OSAN.1 B. ABDULAI, Procurement Specialist, ORNG/ORPF H. DJOUSSOU-LORNG, Agricultural Economist, OSAN.2 F. ONDOBO, Agribusiness Specialist, OSAN.2 R. BAKO, Disbursement Assistant, ORNG O. IKUFORIJI, Consultant, Environment & Climate Change, OSAN.3 Appraisal Team Sector Manager: P.AGBOMA, OSAN.2 Sector Director: C. OJUKWU, OSAN Regional Directors: J. KOLSTER, ORNA A. BERNOUSSI, ORWA M. KANGA, ORCE E. FAAL, ORSA ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK (ESMF) SUMMARY Project Name: TECHNOLOGIES FOR AFRICAN AGRICULTURE TRANSFORMATION Project Number: P- Z1-A00-016 Country: MULTINATIONAL Department: AHAI Division: AHAI.2 Environmental Category: 2 1. Introduction TAAT is a flagship program of the African Development Bank’s Feed Africa Strategy designed to mobilize proven agricultural technologies that will increase production and value addition of key agriculture commodities. The program aims to overcome two key challenges attributed to the adoption of agriculture technologies i.e., limited consideration of newly emerging agriculture technologies (required to boost agricultural production) by regional member countries (RMCs) causing them to fall short of their impact targets and poor commercialization
    [Show full text]
  • CGIAR Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
    Plant Variety Protection and Technology Transfer: The benefits of public-private partnership Perspectives of the CGIAR Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers Lloyd Le Page, CEO Consortium Office, Montpellier, France. CGIAR Consortium: Who and where we are Consortium of 15 International Agricultural Research Centers that operate in over 200 locations world wide Formed in 2010 as part of reform of the CGIAR, this year 40 years old Consortium Office established in Montpellier, France in March 2011 IFPRI World Agro- CIMMYT Forestry CIAT Bioversity CIP ICARDA Africa Rice ICRISAT IITA IWMI ILRI World Fish CIFOR IRRI Our Vision Task : ❶To reduce poverty and hunger, ❷improve human health and nutrition, and ❸enhance ecosystem resilience How: • high‐quality international agricultural research • partnership and leadership Photo: CGIAR CGIAR Research Programs Main organizational mechanism for planning and conducting research Built on three core principles • Impact on system‐level outcomes • reduced rural poverty • improved food security • improved nutrition and health • sustainably managed natural resources • Integration across CGIAR core competencies • Appropriate partnerships at all stages of R&D CGIAR Research Programs CGIAR Research Programs Intellectual Assets and the Consortium The Consortium and its member Centers regard results and outputs of our research and development activities as goods for the public at large (IPGs) – committed to their widespread diffusion and use – seek to achieve maximum possible access, scale and
    [Show full text]
  • Technology and the Africa Rice Center
    Daniels Fund Ethics Initiative University of New Mexico http://danielsethics.mgt.unm.edu Debate Technology and the Africa Rice Center ISSUE: Should genetic modification be used to further economic development? In Africa, the rice industry is represented by the Africa Rice Center, formerly known as West Africa Rice Development Association (WARDA). The mission of the center is to contribute to poverty alleviation and food security in Africa, through research, development, and partnership activities aimed at increasing the productivity and profitability of the rice sector in ways that ensure the sustainability of the farming environment. The association started in 1970 and today boasts twenty-two African nations as members and partners with many international organizations, including the United Nations, European Commission, and the World Health Organizations. In carrying out its mission, the center recognizes three key barriers, including (1) low productivity and sustainability of rice, (2) poor quality of the marketed product, and (3) unfavorable market and policy environment. To overcome these issues, the center established a strategic plan, including the use of research and development protocols to bridge genetic diversity and produce new variations of rice and disease-resistant crops. The center's current technologies allowed for the introduction of NERICA (New Rice for Africa) rice varieties. NERICA was created by crossing O. glaberrima and O. sativa, two species of rice that demonstrate different strengths and weaknesses when grown in Africa. Rice farmers had long hoped to combine the best traits of the two species, but efforts had been fruitless. In the early 1990s, WARDA breeders turned to biotechnology in an attempt to overcome the infertility problem.
    [Show full text]
  • CGIAR at the World Food Prize Flyer
    CGIAR at the World Food Prize The World Food Prize will take place in October 2018 at their headquarters in Des Moines, Iowa. This prestigious event, including the World Food Prize Borlaug Dialogue and the World Food Prize Laureate Award Presentation, is a unique opportunity to showcase how CGIAR science is tackling humanity’s greatest challenges and to create more sustainable food systems. CGIAR will have a strong presence at the World Food Prize this year to celebrate our shared history and to showcase the future of CGIAR research in these five transformative areas: Nutrition, Genomics, Economics, Information and the Environment. In recognition of this year’s theme Rise to the Challenge, CGIAR will participate in: A pathway for research to 2030 A CGIAR Plenary Session, Borlaug Dialogue Rise to the Challenge: ‘A pathway for research to 2030’ – how will the global community implement high impact research to respond to humanity’s greatest challenges in: food security, environment, health, climate and jobs. What new strategies are required in agricultural research for development to deliver impact at scale by 2030 and to contribute to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)? To deliver what are some of the most promising, future-facing innovations in 5 global transformation areas: Nutrition, Genomics, Economics, Information and the Environment? Date and time: October 17, 14:10-15:10 PM Framing and moderation: Elwyn Grainger-Jones, Executive Director, CGIAR System Organization Speakers: Dr. Noelle Cockett, President of Utah State University Hon. Dan Glickman, Former U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, and Vice President and Executive Director, Aspen Institute Congressional Program Dr.
    [Show full text]