Kanopolis Lake Brochure
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Kansas Resource Management Plan and Record of Decision
United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Tulsa District Oklahoma Resource Area September 1991 KANSAS RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Dear Reader: This doCument contains the combined Kansas Record of Decision (ROD) and Resource Management Plan (RMP). The ROD and RMP are combined to streamline our mandated land-use-planning requirements and to provide the reader with a useable finished product. The ROD records the decisions of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for administration of approximately 744,000 acres of Federal mineral estate within the Kansas Planning Area. The Planning Area encompasses BLM adm in i sterad sp 1 it-estate mi nera 1 s and Federa 1 minerals under Federal surface administered by other Federal Agencies within the State of Kansas. The Kansas RMP and appendices provide direction and guidance to BLM Managers in the formulation of decisions effecting the management of Federal mineral estate within the planning area for the next 15 years. The Kansas RMP was extracted from the Proposed Kansas RMP/FIES. The issuance of this ROD and RMP completes the BLM land use planning process for the State of Kansas. We now move to implementation of the plan. We wish to thank all the individuals and groups who participated in this effort these past two years, without their help we could not have completed this process. er~ 1_' Area Manager Oklahoma Resource Area RECORD OF DECISION on the Proposed Kansas Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement September 1991 RECORD OF DECISION The decision is hereby made to approve the proposed decision as described in the Proposed Kansas Resource Management Plan/Final Env ironmental Impact Statement (RMP/FEIS July 1991), MANAGEMENT CONSZOERATXONS The decision to approve the Proposed Plan is based on: (1) the input received from the public, other Federal and state agencies; (2) the environmental analysis for the alternatives considered in the Draft RMP/Oraft EIS, as we11 as the Proposed Kansas RMP/FEIS. -
Suspended-Sediment Loads, Reservoir Sediment Trap Efficiency, and Upstream and Downstream Channel Stability for Kanopolis and Tuttle Creek Lakes, Kansas, 2008–10
Prepared in cooperation with the Kansas Water Office Suspended-Sediment Loads, Reservoir Sediment Trap Efficiency, and Upstream and Downstream Channel Stability for Kanopolis and Tuttle Creek Lakes, Kansas, 2008–10 Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5187 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover. Upper left: Tuttle Creek Lake upstream from highway 16 bridge, May 16, 2011 (photograph by Dirk Hargadine, USGS). Lower right: Tuttle Creek Lake downstream from highway 16 bridge, May 16, 2011 (photograph by Dirk Hargadine, USGS). Note: On May 16, 2011, the water-surface elevation for Tuttle Creek Lake was 1,075.1 feet. The normal elevation for the multi-purpose pool of the reservoir is 1,075.0 feet. Back cover. Water-quality monitor in Little Blue River near Barnes, Kansas. Note active channel-bank erosion at upper right (photograph by Bill Holladay, USGS). Suspended-Sediment Loads, Reservoir Sediment Trap Efficiency, and Upstream and Downstream Channel Stability for Kanopolis and Tuttle Creek Lakes, Kansas, 2008–10 By Kyle E. Juracek Prepared in cooperation with the Kansas Water Office Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5187 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2011 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. -
© 2006 Barbo-Carlson Enterprises Soderstrom Elementary Bethany
SHERIDAN To Coronado Heights Falun Smolan CORONADO To I-135 ALD CT COURT Assaria EMER Bridgeport Gypsum GARFIELD CIRCLE Salina CRESTVIEW DRIVE MEADOW LANE GARFIELD RUN NORTHRIDGE PHEASANT (County road) SUNSET WESTVIEW Välkommen Trail Trail Head COURT FIRST SECOND KANSAS Emerald Lake ALD COLUMBUS EMER NORMAL DIAMOND © 2006 NORMAL Barbo-Carlson Enterprises BETHANY DRIVE Lindsborg Bethany College Tree Station SAPPHIRE MAIN BUSINESS 81 ROUTE SWENSSON SWENSSON WELLS FARGO ROAD (SWEN SSON) Viking To Golf Valley Bethany n Elmwood Course Playground é College Cemetery GREEN Swensson Park Lindsborg Middle Birger Sandz Memorial Gallery OLSSON Smoky School Sandzén Valley MADISON High Gallery School WESTMAN Bethany COURT VIKING Home FIRST KANSAS McKINLEY ROOSEVELT SALINE Bethany Home THIRD STATE CHESTNUT STATE Soderstrom Soderstrom Elementary Elementary School MAPLE LILLGATAN CEDAR LINCOLN LINCOLN Downtown Lindsborg City Hall Community PINE Hospital K-4/HARRISON K-4/COLE CORONADO DRIVE (McPherson County’s 13th AVENUE / Saline County’s BURMA ROAD) CORONADO DRIVE (McPherson County’s 13th AVENUE GRANT MAIN lkommen Trail lkommen ä Red Barn V JACKSON for the Artsfor THIRD CEDAR CHERRY SECOND CHESTNUT WASHINGTON UNION Studio Museum Society Raymer UNION Red Barn Studio FIRST McPHERSON K-4 K-4 CEDARCLE Old Mill CIR Museum WILLOW LAKE DRIVE K-4 älkommenTrail V KANSAS LINDSBORG Trail Head Riverside Lindsborg Park & Lindsborg MS Community Hospital Smoky Valley HS Smoky Valley LAKESIDE Park Swimming K-4 DRIVE To Heritage Pool Kanopolis Lake MILL Marquette McPherson MAIN County SVENSK ROAD Old Mill Museum Smoky Hill River BUSINESS 81 ROUTE SVENSK ROAD To I-135 Maxwell Wildlife Refuge McPherson Roxbury. -
Kansas River Basin Model
Kansas River Basin Model Edward Parker, P.E. US Army Corps of Engineers Kansas City District KANSAS CITY DISTRICT NEBRASKA IOWA RATHBUN M I HARLAN COUNTY S S I LONG S S I SMITHVILLE BRANCH P TUTTLE P CREEK I URI PERRY SSO K MI ANS AS R I MILFORD R. V CLINTON E WILSON BLUE SPRINGS R POMONA LONGVIEW HARRY S. TRUMAN R COLO. KANOPOLIS MELVERN HILLSDALE IV ER Lake of the Ozarks STOCKTON KANSAS POMME DE TERRE MISSOURI US Army Corps of Engineers Kansas City District Kansas River Basin Operation Challenges • Protect nesting Least Terns and Piping Plovers that have taken residence along the Kansas River. • Supply navigation water support for the Missouri River. • Reviewing requests from the State of Kansas and the USBR to alter the standard operation to improve support for recreation, irrigation, fish & wildlife. US Army Corps of Engineers Kansas City District Model Requirements • Model Period 1/1/1920 through 12/31/2000 • Six-Hour routing period • Forecast local inflow using recession • Use historic pan evaporation – Monthly vary pan coefficient • Parallel and tandem operation • Consider all authorized puposes • Use current method of flood control US Army Corps of Engineers Kansas City District Model PMP Revisions • Model period from 1/1/1929 through 12/30/2001 • Mean daily flows for modeling rather than 6-hour data derived from mean daily flow values. • Delete the requirement to forecast future hydrologic conditions. • Average monthly lake evaporation rather than daily • Utilize a standard pan evaporation coefficient of 0.7 rather than a monthly varying value. • Separate the study basin between the Smoky River Basin and the Republican/Kansas River Basin. -
Microfilm Publication M617, Returns from U.S
Publication Number: M-617 Publication Title: Returns from U.S. Military Posts, 1800-1916 Date Published: 1968 RETURNS FROM U.S. MILITARY POSTS, 1800-1916 On the 1550 rolls of this microfilm publication, M617, are reproduced returns from U.S. military posts from the early 1800's to 1916, with a few returns extending through 1917. Most of the returns are part of Record Group 94, Records of the Adjutant General's Office; the remainder is part of Record Group 393, Records of United States Army Continental Commands, 1821-1920, and Record Group 395, Records of United States Army Overseas Operations and Commands, 1898-1942. The commanding officer of every post, as well ad commanders of all other bodies of troops such as department, division, brigade, regiment, or detachment, was required by Army Regulations to submit a return (a type of personnel report) to The Adjutant General at specified intervals, usually monthly, on forms provided by that office. Several additions and modifications were made in the form over the years, but basically it was designed to show the units that were stationed at a particular post and their strength, the names and duties of the officers, the number of officers present and absent, a listing of official communications received, and a record of events. In the early 19th century the form used for the post return usually was the same as the one used for regimental or organizational returns. Printed forms were issued by the Adjutant General’s Office, but more commonly used were manuscript forms patterned after the printed forms. -
State of the Resource & Regional Goal Action Plan Implementation
State of the Resource & Regional Goal Action Plan Implementation Report August 2018 Smoky Hill-Saline Regional Planning Area Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................2 WATER USE TRENDS ...........................................................................................................................3 WATER RESOURCES CONDITIONS .......................................................................................................5 GROUNDWATER ................................................................................................................................................ 5 SURFACE WATER ............................................................................................................................................... 6 WATER QUALITY .............................................................................................................................. 10 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS .......................................................................................................... 14 SURFACE WATER ............................................................................................................................................. 14 IMPLEMENTATION NEEDS ................................................................................................................ 16 REGIONAL GOALS & ACTION PLAN PROGRESS ................................................................................. -
Lake Level Management Plans Water Year 2017
LAKE LEVEL MANAGEMENT PLANS WATER YEAR 2017 KANSAS WATER OFFICE 2016 CORPS OF ENGINEERS, KANSAS CITY DISTRICT ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 CLINTON LAKE ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 HILLSDALE LAKE ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 KANOPOLIS LAKE ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 MELVERN LAKE ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 MILFORD LAKE ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 PERRY LAKE ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. -
The Explorer
Issue #97 February 2013 THE EXPLORER The Kansas Explorers Club is created to inspire, educate, and encourage the exploration and appreciation of Kansas...and to have fun doing it! Explorers are urged to look for the rural culture elements in each town — architecture, art, commerce, cuisine, customs, geography, history, and people. Kansas Sampler Foundation, 978 Arapaho Rd., Inman, KS 67546 620.585.2374 kansassampler.org [email protected] / [email protected] KANSAS IS 152! KANSAS DAY WAS JANUARY 29 105 DESTINATION PLACES It was a contentious time. The whole country was watching. Would Kansas come into the union as a IN 105 COUNTIES slave state or free state? The debates between pro-slavery and antislavery forces at Constitution In honor of Kansas Day, this will be an all-across-Kansas Hall in Lecompton were animated and ferocious. newsletter! If your quest is to go to every Kansas county, On January 29, 1861 President James Buchanan here is a starter kit of places that will help you see the signed into law that Kansas would become the 34th broad story of who we are and what we look like. state. We entered as a free state. Allen County: Humboldt’s interpretive signage helps us Learn more at Constitution Hall, 319 Elmore, in realize Kansas’s connection to the Civil War. Start with Lecompton. Open Wednesday-Saturday 9 a.m.- the Civil War monument in the town square. 5 p.m.; Sunday 1-5 p.m. kshs.org/constitution_hall A TIP ON DIGGING IN AS A KANSAS EXPLORER Find iQuest Shirts and a Quest Consider these Kit online at kansassampler.org. -
Lake Level Management Plans Water Year 2019
LAKE LEVEL MANAGEMENT PLANS WATER YEAR 2019 Kansas Water Office September 2018 Table of Contents U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, KANSAS CITY DISTRICT .................................................................................................................................... 3 CLINTON LAKE ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................4 HILLSDALE LAKE ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................6 KANOPOLIS LAKE .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................8 MELVERN LAKE .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................10 MILFORD LAKE ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................12 -
Kansas Byways INTERPRETIVE PLAN Monument Rocks
2014 Kansas Byways INTERPRETIVE PLAN Monument Rocks 1 Kansas Byways Interpretive Plan - Fermata, Inc. Kansas Byways Interpretive Plan - Fermata, Inc 2 Kansas sunflower 3 Kansas Byways Interpretive Plan - Fermata, Inc. Preface Go West, young man, go West and grow up with the country. --Horace Greeley or most of our early history the U.S. had clung to the Atlantic Coast. Yet F the United States exploded from a population of just fewer than 2 million in 1770 to 38.5 million in 1870. The Battle of Fallen Timbers in western Ohio (1794) removed the last vestiges of Indian opposition to westward immigration. The Louisiana Purchase (1803), followed by the early explorers such as Lewis, Clark, Pike, and Long, opened America’s eyes to the possibilities west of the Appalachian range. President Andrew Jackson’s Indian Removal Act of 1830 finally pushed the eastern tribes west of the Mississippi, and open the door to our western potential. We would cling to the Atlantic no longer. Funded in part by Federal Highway Administration Kansas Byways wayside welcome sign Three events precluded an incremental (and logical) expansion of the U.S. across the settlers from considering the area suitable for Great Plains. Although the Indian Removal Act agriculture. Suddenly California became the successfully forced tribes to the west, the lands destination of choice. where they settled, such as the Kansas territory, were declared out of bounds for settlement. Third, the discovery of gold in California in The barrier didn’t evaporate; the barrier simply 1849 accelerated the rush to the west coast. shifted west of the Mississippi. -
Congression .Al Record-House
1922. .CONGRESSION.AL RECORD-HOUSE. 8481 and fully given of the acts, policies, and motives of at least one, Committee on Military .Affairs may have five days in which to nncl, speaking for the Secretary of the Navy, of two of the mem file minority views. ber of your official family. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Illinois I am. sir, asks unanimous consent th.at any member of the Committee on 'Very sincerely yours, Military .Affairs may have five legislative days in whlch to file ALBERT B. FALL, Secretary. minority views on the bill H . .R. 11903. Is there objection? The PRESIDEN T, Mr. GARRETT of Tennessee. l\Ir. Speaker, reserving the The TFhite House. .right to· object, may I ask the gentleman if he is in a po ·ition NAVAL OIL RESERVE LEASES (S. DOC. 210). where he can inform the House as to the probability as to when this bill ·will be considered? Mr. SJUOOT. I submit a resolution and ask that it be read. Mr. McKENZIE. I will say very frankly to the gentleman The resolution ( S. Res. 305) was read, as follows : from Tennessee that I am not able to give him that information. R esolv ed, That the message of the President of the United States, with the accompanying communication from the Secretary of the Inte Personally I would be glad to see an early consideration of the rior, and illustrations, in response to Senate Resolution 282, requesting measuTe. cert ain information c-0ncerning naval reserve oil leases, be printed as M.r. -
Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks & Tourism
Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks & Tourism Alan Stark Supervisor – Arkansas & Neosho Regions Kansas State Parks Wilson State Park KANSAS OUTDOOR RECREATION ECONOMY •71,000 Direct Jobs •$7.3 Billion in Consumer Spending •$1.8 Billion in Wages & Salaries •$481 Million in State and Local Tax Revenue KANSAS STATE PARKS PARK FEE FUND BALANCE • 2018 Visitation – 6,897,836 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 • Facilities – 463 $4,000,000 FY 2013 $3,000,000 FY • Park Offices – 22 2014 FY 2015 $2,000,000 FY 2016 FY • Miles of Road – 400 $1,000,000 2017 $- • Boat Ramp Lanes - 173 Army Corps of Engineers Bureau of Reclamation • Clinton State Park • Cedar Bluff State Park • Cross Timbers State Park • Cheney State Park • Eisenhower State Park • El Dorado State Park • Glen Elder State Park • Elk City State Park • Lovewell State Park • Fall River State Park • Prairie Dog State Park • Hillsdale State Park • Webster State Park • Kanopolis State Park • Milford State Park • Perry State Park • Pomona State Park • Tuttle Creek State Park • Wilson State Park HAB – Blue Green Algae • Cheney State Park • Glen Elder State Park • Lovewell State Park • Meade State Park • Milford State Park • Prairie Dog State Park • Historic Lake Scott State Park • Webster State Park Effects of Blue Green Algae on Meade State Park Two consecutive years of blooms hurt park visitation and revenue • 2010 Visitation down 15,954 with $16,384.00 lost revenue • 2010 Park shut down to all water activities • 2011 Visitation down 31,525 with $37,247.00 lost revenue • 2011 No swimming and boating discouraged