Trading Overseas in the Early Republic Lecture Finding Aid & Transcript
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY of AMERICA the Bill of Rights And
THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA The Bill of Rights and Federalism: An Interpretation in Light of the Unwritten Constitution A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the Department of Politics School of Arts and Sciences Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Philosophy © Copyright All Rights Reserved By Joseph S. Devaney Washington, D.C. 2010 The Bill of Rights and Federalism: An Interpretation in Light of the Unwritten Constitution Joseph S. Devaney, Ph.D. Director: Claes G. Ryn, Ph.D. According to conventional understanding, the primary purpose behind the framing and ratification of the Constitution was to preserve liberty through a form of government that provided for a highly structured system of federalism and separation of powers. The primary purpose behind the framing and ratification of the Bill of Rights was to allay Anti-Federalist fears that the Constitution did not sufficiently secure individual rights. For that reason, the original Constitution is frequently contrasted with the Bill of Rights. Yet distinguishing between the Constitution and the Bill of Rights obscures more about the nature of the Bill of Rights than it discloses. It is agreed that one of the primary Anti-Federalist objections to the Constitution was the absence of a bill of rights. A close examination of the debate over the absence of a bill of rights reveals that the first ten amendments to the Constitution occupy a much more complex place in the constitutional scheme than is commonly assumed. While individual rights did constitute an important theme during the ensuing debate concerning the importance of a bill of rights, they were not the only theme or even the prevailing theme. -
Salem Maritime National Historic Site
SALEM MARITIME NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE . MASSACHUSETTS ble for Salem to provide more men and ships channels of trade to Africa, Australia, and The same year the Grand Tur\ was dis by Hawthorne as a customs officer have been for privateering than any other port in the South America were explored. After the dis patched to the Cape of Good Hope and upon preserved. In the southeast room of the Cus United Colonies. From the beginning of covery of gold in California, Salem shipown her return, in 1785, was started on a voyage tom House are exhibits and panels which 1776 to the end of 1782, Salem averaged 50 ers were among the first to reap profits from that took her through the Indies and across illustrate and interpret for you the fascinating vessels continually at sea preying on enemy the trade around Cape Horn to San Francisco. the China Sea to Canton. These were but the history of Salem's oceangoing commerce. shipping and engaging enemy ships. However, the great increase in the size of first of a succession of voyages made into dis At the end of the war, the energy that had vessels which came with the decade of the tant seas before 1800. After this period of The Derby House been shown in privateering found an outlet in clipper ship, 1850-60, brought Salem's mari glory there followed a century of neglect, until THE Derby House, now the oldest brick a worldwide search for new markets. Pio time cycle abruptly to a close. Her land the sea walls of Derby Wharf were recon dwelling in Salem, was erected in 1761-62, neering voyages were made by Salem ship locked harbor was too shallow to accommo structed by the National Park Service in 1938. -
Salem Maritime National Historic Site Massachusetts
Salem Maritime National Historic Site Salem Maritime Massachusetts National Park Service Official Map and Guide - Large Print U.S. Department of the Interior 8 2 9 6 4 5 7 Orientation Center 3 Hatch’s Wharf Derby Wharf About Your Visit Salem Maritime National Historic Site is on Derby 1 Street, Salem, Massachusetts, 20 miles northeast of Boston. Groups may receive special service if advance arrangements are made at the site. For Your Safety Central Wharf Every effort has been made to provide for your safety, but you should be alert around the water- Touring the Site front and on the wharves. Watch your children. The wharves at Salem Maritime National For More Information Historic Site stretch out into the salt waters of Salem Salem Maritime National Historic Site Harbor, testifying to the city’s former dependence on the 174 Derby Street sea. The once-busy wharves and the buildings facing the harbor Salem, MA 01970 are remnants of the shipping industry that prospered in www.nps.gov/sama Massachusetts Bay’s oldest seaport well into the last century. The old waterfront area was designated a National Historic Site in 1938 because of the importance of commercial shipping to the early U.S. economy, the signifi- cance of the port of Salem (once the Nation’s sixth largest city), and the quality of the surviving seaport features. 1 Derby Wharf (1762), Hatch’s Wharf (1819), and Central Wharf (1791) are typical of the many wharves that once lined Salem Harbor. They were covered with dozens of warehouses—14 on Derby Wharf alone. -
Sweet Auburn, Fall 2013
Sweet Auburn Magazine of the Friends of Mount Auburn | Fall 2013 The Art of Memory: Monuments Through Time Fall 2013 | 1 President’sSweet Auburn Corner A publication of the President’s Corner Friends of Mount Auburn Cemetery Many of the pleasures of Mount Auburn are ephemeral, 580 Mount Auburn Street from the brightly-plumaged warblers and vibrant flowers Cambridge, MA 02138 of the spring to the spectacular foliage of the fall. But one 617-547-7105 johnston Jennifer by photo www.mountauburn.org feature remains constant throughout the year–the monuments Editorial Committee erected in the landscape to honor the memory of those buried here. These monuments, ranging from inscribed flat memorials Bree D. Harvey, Editor Vice President of Cemetery & Visitor Services to tall and grand works of sculptural art, appear to be solid Jennifer J. Johnston, Managing Editor unmoving stone, but they have lives of their own, both in Webmaster, Media & Imaging Coordinator the stories they tell and in their presence in the landscape David P. Barnett, Contributing Editor around them. Their stories live on through the research Dave Barnett President & CEO, Mount Auburn Cemetery and educational efforts of our historical collections staff Steve Brown / Preservation Craftsperson and volunteers, while their physical presence lives on through the work of our preservation Jessica Bussmann / Education & Volunteer Coordinator staff. In this issue, we explore the meaning and challenges of maintaining these monuments Jane M. Carroll / Vice President of Development of Mount Auburn and introduce you to the staff responsible for preserving them. We also Dennis Collins / Horticultural Curator provide examples of how new monuments continue to enhance the landscape as new memories and traditions are added to the collection that make the Cemetery a visible Candace Currie / Director of Planning & Sustainability representation of remembrance and love for those who have passed. -
Nathaniel Bowditch from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
Nathaniel Bowditch From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Nathaniel Bowditch (1773-1838), American mathematician and actuary Bowditch is often credited as the founder of modern maritime navigation. Born March 26, 1773 Salem, Province of Massachusetts Bay Died March 16, 1838 (aged 64) Boston, Massachusetts, U.S. Occupation Mathematician, ship's captain, and actuary Spouse(s) Elizabeth Boardman Bowditch, Mary Polly Ingersoll Bowditch Nathaniel Bowditch was an early American mathematician remembered for his work on ocean navigation. He is often credited as the founder of modern maritime navigation; his book The New American Practical Navigator, first published in 1802, is still carried on board every commissioned U.S. Naval vessel. In 2001, an elementary and middle school in Salem was named in his honor. Life and work Nathaniel Bowditch, the fourth of seven children, was born in Salem, Province of Massachusetts Bay, to Habakkuk Bowditch, a cooper, and Mary (Ingersoll) Bowditch. At the age of ten, he was made to leave school to work in his father's cooperage, before becoming indentured at twelve for nine years as a bookkeeping apprentice to a ship chandler. In 1786, age fourteen, Bowditch began to study algebra and two years later he taught himself calculus. He also taught himself Latin in 1790 and French in 1792 so he was able to read mathematical works such as Isaac Newton's Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica. He found thousands of errors in John Hamilton Moore's The New Practical Navigator; at eighteen, he copied all the mathematical papers of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. -
MOUNT AUBURN CEMETERY Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-8 OMB No. 1024-0018 MOUNT AUBURN CEMETERY Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: Mount Auburn Cemetery Other Name/Site Number: n/a 2. LOCATION Street & Number: Roughly bounded by Mount Auburn Street, Not for publication:_ Coolidge Avenue, Grove Street, the Sand Banks Cemetery, and Cottage Street City/Town: Watertown and Cambridge Vicinityj_ State: Massachusetts Code: MA County: Middlesex Code: 017 Zip Code: 02472 and 02318 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: X Building(s): _ Public-Local: _ District: X Public-State: _ Site: Public-Federal: Structure: _ Object:_ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 4 4 buildings 1 ___ sites 4 structures 15 ___ objects 26 8 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 26 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: n/a NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 MOUNT AUBURN CEMETERY Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this ___ nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. -
Asher Benjamin As an Architect in Windsor, Vermont
Summer 1974 VOL. 42 NO.3 The GpROCEEDINGS of the VERMONT HISTORICAL SOCIETY This famous architect built a meetinghouse and three private houses in Windsor before he left for Boston in 1802 ... Asher Benjamin as an Architect in Windsor, Vennont By JOHN QUINAN N August of 1802 the architect Asher Benjamin wrote from Boston to I Gideon Granger, the Postmaster General of the United States, seeking aid in obtaining a commission for a marine hospital in that city. Benjamin's letter identifies by name and location most of his first eight commissions - a rare and unusual document in American architectural history which enables us to trace his path northward from Hartford, Con necticut, to Windsor, Vermont. Benjamin wrote, in part: "Sir, I have since I left Suffield Conn. built the following houses, Viz. Samuel Hinckley, Northampton, William Coleman's Greenfield, Luke Baldwin's Esq., Brookfield, and a Meeting House and three other large houses in Windsor, Vermont, The Academy at Deerfield. l Most of these commissions have not fared very well. The Deerfield Academy building (Memorial Hall, 1798-1799) was altered sufficiently during the nineteenth century to obscure much of its original character. The Baldwin and Hinckley houses (both c.17%) were demolished early in the twentieth century and are lost to us, and it seems that the William Coleman house in Greenfield (1797) (Fig. 6) is the sole survivor of Benjamin's first decade of practice. But what of the four unnamed build ings in Windsor? Are they identifiable? Do they still stand in Windsor? Have they any special interest or significance? The four Windsor buildings are identifiable despite the fact that the three houses have been demolished and the meetinghouse has been altered I. -
H. Doc. 108-222
FOURTH CONGRESS MARCH 4, 1795, TO MARCH 3, 1797 FIRST SESSION—December 7, 1795, to June 1, 1796 SECOND SESSION—December 5, 1796, to March 3, 1797 SPECIAL SESSION OF THE SENATE—June 8, 1795, to June 26, 1795 VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES—JOHN ADAMS, of Massachusetts PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE—HENRY TAZEWELL, 1 of Virginia; SAMUEL LIVERMORE, 2 of New Hampshire; WILLIAM BINGHAM, 3 of Pennsylvania SECRETARY OF THE SENATE—SAMUEL A. OTIS, of Massachusetts DOORKEEPER OF THE SENATE—JAMES MATHERS, of New York SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES—JONATHAN DAYTON, 4 of New Jersey CLERK OF THE HOUSE—JOHN BECKLEY, 5 of Virginia SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE HOUSE—JOSEPH WHEATON, of Rhode Island DOORKEEPER OF THE HOUSE—THOMAS CLAXTON CONNECTICUT GEORGIA Richard Potts 17 18 SENATORS SENATORS John Eager Howard Oliver Ellsworth 6 James Gunn REPRESENTATIVES James Hillhouse 7 James Jackson 14 8 Jonathan Trumbull George Walton 15 Gabriel Christie 9 Uriah Tracy Josiah Tattnall 16 Jeremiah Crabb 19 REPRESENTATIVES AT LARGE 20 REPRESENTATIVES AT LARGE William Craik Joshua Coit 21 Abraham Baldwin Gabriel Duvall Chauncey Goodrich Richard Sprigg, Jr. 22 Roger Griswold John Milledge George Dent James Hillhouse 10 James Davenport 11 KENTUCKY William Hindman Nathaniel Smith SENATORS Samuel Smith Zephaniah Swift John Brown Thomas Sprigg 12 Uriah Tracy Humphrey Marshall William Vans Murray Samuel Whittlesey Dana 13 REPRESENTATIVES DELAWARE Christopher Greenup MASSACHUSETTS SENATORS Alexander D. Orr John Vining SENATORS Henry Latimer MARYLAND Caleb Strong 23 REPRESENTATIVE AT LARGE SENATORS Theodore Sedgwick 24 John Patten John Henry George Cabot 25 1 Elected December 7, 1795. -
The East India Marine Society's
Global Knowledge in the Early Republic The East India Marine Society’s “Curiosities” Museum Patricia Johnston On a cold January day in 1804, the Reverend William Bentley, pastor of the East Church, stood and watched a strange and exotic parade weaving through the streets of Salem, Massachusetts. A number of sea captains, who had just returned from Sumatra, Bombay, Calcutta, Canton, Manila, and other Asian ports, put on this public display to commemorate their recent business adventures. Bentley recorded in his diary, “This day is the Annual Meeting of the East India Marine Society. After business & before din- ner they moved in procession, . Each of the brethren bore some Indian curiosity & the palanquin was borne by the negroes dressed nearly in the Indian manner. A person dressed in Chinese habits & mask passed in front. The crowd of spectators was great.”1 The objects that the minister described demonstrate the global circula- tion of material culture in the Early Republic. Waiting in Asian harbors for trade opportunities, captains and crews swapped souvenirs that had literally circled the world. When they returned to their hometowns, they shared the objects they collected, both privately with acquaintances and publicly in mu- seums and parades that were widely covered in the newspapers. These global artifacts provide insights into the broad intellectual pursuits of the Early Republic, including natural history, ethnography, and aesthetics. The objects also illuminate early trade relations and cultural perceptions between Asia and the new United States. When displayed back in the United States, artifacts helped construct and reinforce social hierarchies in American seaports; they also expressed America’s arrival as a full participant in world commerce. -
Enumeration and Other Constitutional Strategies for Protecting Rights: the View from 1787/1791
ARTICLES ENUMERATION AND OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL STRATEGIES FOR PROTECTING RIGHTS: THE VIEW FROM 1787/1791 Mark A. Graber Constitutional designers employ many strategies for securing what they believe are fundamental rights and vital interests.' Specifying in the constitutional text the rights and interests to be protected is a common device. In a constitution that relies solely on enumeration as a rights-protective strategy, whether that constitution protects abortion rights depends on whether any provision in that constitu- tion is best interpreted as granting women a right to terminate their pregnancies. Enumerating the powers government officials may ex- ercise is a second rights-protective strategy. Government may not constitutionally ban partial-birth abortions, although no constitu- tional provision properly interpreted protects a right to reproductive choice, when no constitutional provision properly interpreted au- thorizes government officials to interfere with reproductive decisions. Structuring government institutions is a third rights-protective strat- egy, one that does not rely primarily on enumeration or interpreta- tion. Government officials do not ban abortion, even when at least some reasonable persons believe constitutional provisions are best in- terpreted as permitting legislative prohibitions, when the constitu- tional rules for staffing the government and passing laws consistently provide pro-choice advocates with the power necessary to prevent hostile proposals from becoming law. Equal protection is a fourth strategy for protecting fundamental rights. Elected officials are less inclined to ban abortion when they may not constitutionally confine that prohibition to certain social classes or racial groups. Professor of Government, University of Maryland, College Park; Professor of Law, Univer- sity of Maryland School of Law. -
John Winthrop (1587/88-1649), 1798 Samuel Mcintire (1757-1811
John Winthrop (1587/88-1649), 1798 Samuel McIntire (1757-1811) carved and painted wood 15 1/2 (h) (39.370) inscribed on the base: "Winthrop” Bequest of William Bentley, 1819 Weis 149 Hewes number: 155 Ex. Coll.: commissioned by the donor, 1798. Exhibitions: 1804, Independence Day Celebration, Salem Meeting House. 1931, "American Folk Sculpture," Newark Museum, Newark, New Jersey. 1957, "Samuel McIntire," Essex Institute, no. 8. 1977, "Landscape and Faction: Spatial Transformation in William Bentley's Salem," Essex Institute, no. 18. Publications: "Editor's Attic," The Magazine Antiques 21(January 1932): 8, 12. "Editor's Attic," The Magazine Antiques 28(October 1935): 138-40. Fiske Kimball, Mr. Samuel McIntire, Carver, The Architect of Salem (Portland, Maine: Southworth-Anthoensen Press, 1940): 138, fig. 362. Nina Fletcher Little, "Carved Figures by Samuel McIntire and his Contemporaries," Essex Institute Historical Collections 93(April-July 1957): 195-96, fig. 48. Susan Geib, "Landscape and Faction: Spatial Transformation in William Bentley's Salem," Essex Institute Historical Collections 113(July 1977): 217. This bust of John Winthrop was carved nearly one hundred and fifty years after the governor's death. It was commissioned by the Salem minister William Bentley (cat. #8) in 1798 as an addition to his "cabinet" of portraits of famous Massachusetts politicians and ministers. Bentley owned a painted miniature of the governor (cat. #154) that had been copied from a large seventeenth century canvas (cat. #153). Bentley loaned this miniature to the carver, Samuel McIntire, for the artist to use as reference for the carving. Bentley was familiar with the carver and his work. -
Few Americans in the 1790S Would Have Predicted That the Subject Of
AMERICAN NAVAL POLICY IN AN AGE OF ATLANTIC WARFARE: A CONSENSUS BROKEN AND REFORGED, 1783-1816 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Jeffrey J. Seiken, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2007 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor John Guilmartin, Jr., Advisor Professor Margaret Newell _______________________ Professor Mark Grimsley Advisor History Graduate Program ABSTRACT In the 1780s, there was broad agreement among American revolutionaries like Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton about the need for a strong national navy. This consensus, however, collapsed as a result of the partisan strife of the 1790s. The Federalist Party embraced the strategic rationale laid out by naval boosters in the previous decade, namely that only a powerful, seagoing battle fleet offered a viable means of defending the nation's vulnerable ports and harbors. Federalists also believed a navy was necessary to protect America's burgeoning trade with overseas markets. Republicans did not dispute the desirability of the Federalist goals, but they disagreed sharply with their political opponents about the wisdom of depending on a navy to achieve these ends. In place of a navy, the Republicans with Jefferson and Madison at the lead championed an altogether different prescription for national security and commercial growth: economic coercion. The Federalists won most of the legislative confrontations of the 1790s. But their very success contributed to the party's decisive defeat in the election of 1800 and the abandonment of their plans to create a strong blue water navy.