DOCSLIB.ORG

Newsletter Volume 14, Number 1 June

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1 Newsletter Volume 14, Number 1 June. 2008 SUMMARIES by Robert Heaston have longer summaries. In this Issue: TH The Editor accepts re- Summaries by Topics of all of 15 NPA CONFERENCE papers. sponsibility for any mis- A. Philosophy of Science p. 1 This issue of the NPA Newsletter summarizes the papers interpretation of the pa- B. Special Relativity p. 3 of the 15th Natural Philosophy Alliance Conference, which pers. C. Electromagnetism p. 5 D. Quantum Mechanics p. 6 was held on 7-11 April 2008 at the University of New Mexico All of the papers E. Aether p. 8 in Albuquerque, NM. We are grateful to the American Asso- were grouped under eight F, Cosmology p. 11 ciation for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) for being able topics. These topics G. Mathematics p. 13 to hold our 15th Annual Conference in conjunction with the (number of papers in pa- H. General Relativity p. 14 83rd Annual Meeting of the AAAS-Southwest and Rocky Moun- Index of Titles & Authors p. 15 rentheses) are: Philosophy Articles: tain Regional Meeting (SWARM). We also offer our thanks to of Science (12); Special Long distance particpation the University of New Mexico and the Sandia National Labo- Relativity Theory (11); proves successful p. 17 ratories who were the local hosts. Electromagnetism (5); Conference Ptrocedings p. 18 The theme for the 15th Annual NPA Conference was Quantum Mechanics (15); “Building a Better Physics Paradigm”. Thomas S. Kuhn Aether (17); Cosmology (13); Mathematics (8); and General popularized the concept of a paradigm, mostly oriented to- Relativity Theory (7). The Editor did consolidate and move wards physics, in his 1970 book The Structure of Scientific some papers under other topics after reviewing the contents Revolutions. “Paradigms are universally recognized scientific in more detail. Summaries are placed in proximity to authors achievements that for a time provide model problems and so- with similar views. A brief discussion of the highlights of lutions to a community of practitioners.” Anomalies and crises issues and results are given at the beginning of each topic provide warning signals that a paradigm is in trouble and area. needs some adjustments or radical changes. Members of NPA point out a number of trouble spots and anomalies in the cur- Philosophy of Science. Twelve papers intentionally rent paradigm and make several suggestions on what might be evaluated the past, present, and the future of the physics a better approach to physics. paradigm. Challenges are expressed as questions. Are A total of 88 summaries of papers are contained in this changes in Newton’s law of gravity necessary? Can we be- NPA Newsletter. A little over half or 47 of the summaries th lieve that the Maxwell equations are universally applicable? were papers presented at the 15 NPA Conference and 41 Is Einstein’s light postulate still valid? Are critical cosmo- summaries of papers submitted in absentia. Papers were logical data being ignored? If the big bang theory is flawed, submitted by authors from Australia, Austria, Ecuador, what should take its place? Could rearrangement of the pri- France, Germany, Greece, India, Malaysia, Mexico, Poland, mary building blocks of the current physics paradigm pro- Russia, Sweden and the United States. If no abstract was con- vide leads to new theories? What are the connections be- tained in the “Conference Program,” or at www.worldnpa.org, tween electricity and gravity? What is dark matter? Do the no summary is included. Summaries were prepared with the laws of motion and spacetime need to be reexamined? Is the intent to report the most positive aspects that the authors con- universe finite or infinite? Does the goal of a theory of eve- cluded and how the results were obtained. But, a collective rything make sense? WANTED: An idea here that can influ- bit of advice to authors is in order. Many of the papers fail ence thinking everywhere. one or more of six criteria (most mainstream papers fail as Spencer [76]1 briefly reviewed the history of the found- well): statement of assumptions, definitions of terms, presen- ing of the Natural Philosophy Alliance and its first meeting tation of sufficient detail so as to replicate/reproduce, ability in San Francisco that featured Linus Pauling. Then she dis- to test or to observe directly or indirectly, simpler than com- cussed a series of questions and issues that will be challenges petitive approaches (Ockham’s razor), and a statement of the for the future. Is the velocity of light a constant as was postu- value added to the pool of knowledge. These are overlooked lated by Einstein? Or can we conclude that the universal in this case because a germ of an idea or a nascent talent needs time postulate, that the velocity of light is a constant relative the chance to grow. to the source at any instant, is the only postulate that is con- Notes, abstracts and complete papers, when available, sistent with all of the experiments hitherto analyzed? Is were used to prepare the summaries. Information on Newton’s law of gravity universally valid, or must it be www.worldnpa.org was particularly useful, thanks to David modified to take into account the seasonal variation that was de Hilster. Equations and special symbols were omitted be- discovered by Monti? Can we believe that Maxwell’s equa- cause of printing guidelines for the NPA Newsletter. Summa- ries average 136 words. Authors with only one paper tend to Note1: The bracketed numbers, e.g. [76], refer to the Index number on pages 14, 15 where the title and author address are provided 2 tions, as postulated by Einstein, are universally valid, or Klyushin used a Natural Philosophy Alliance must they be replaced with the New Gaussian Electromagnetic number of exam- 402 Russell Avenue Theory? We will also have to reexamine chemistry and the ples and equations Gaithersburg, MD 20877-2864 structure of the periodic table, quantum theory, quantum en- to pose his ques- Officers of NPA are: tanglement, and the promises of nanotechnology. Another tions. Domina Eberle Spencer, President, paper discusses what nuclear engineer Roger Rydin [66] and Müller [46] [email protected] Cynthia Whitney, Vice-President, some of his associates in the Natural Philosophy Alliance from Germany galilean electrodynamics (NPA) have to say about critical cosmological data that is be- suggests a list of @comcast.net ing ignored, about obvious errors in relativity theory, and nine topics that Francisco Muller, Vice-President, about new particle and gravitational theories that might point have become en- [email protected] the way to new directions in physics. All of the selected NPA trenched world- Uma Shama, Treasurer [email protected] authors point to theoretical failures in the Big Bang model, to wide in teaching Neil Munch, Secretary, unwarranted corrections made to experimental cosmological theoretical physics [email protected] data to make it fit the Big Bang model, and to conceptual er- that should be re- David de Hilster, Webmaster rors in particle physics brought about by including relativistic considered and [email protected] NPA’s website:,www.worldnpa.org theories and corrections that do not adequately explain all the tested as to their NPA Newsletter Editor: experimental data. Many of these new ideas represent simpler truth. And all of Robert J. Heaston, theoretical models that explain more experimental data, and them fail to pass [email protected] hence meet the essence of Ockham’s razor as areas worth de- the test. He gives veloping. brief comments on each topic, which are: 1) universal crea- Whitney [87] drew a blueprint of the historical develop- tion by one big bang; 2) solar systems creation from dark ment of physics in general, highlighting present-day contribu- matter; 3) circling of electrons in atoms; 4) neutron as an tions from Natural Philosophy Alliance participants in par- elementary particle, 5) the structure of neutrinos; 6) sizes of ticular. The metaphor for physics as a building project in- atomic nuclei; 7) group velocity / delay; 8) a missing fifth volves a number of unwieldy building blocks in not- Maxwell equation; and 9) nuclear forces other than electro- completely-stable relations to each other. Some of the major magnetism. building blocks were Newton, Maxwell, quantum mechanics, Rulers and clocks do not exist independently of the quantum chemistry, quantum electrodynamics, elemental par- world; they are only choices among phenomena. Time and ticle physics, special relativity, general relativity, big bang space do not exist without the other; they are the two faces of theory and the two-step light postulate. Stresses and strains the same substance. Guy [24] from France suggests that the are pointed out in the arrangement of the primary building primary substance is movement, which is associated with any blocks. Redesign/rebuilding efforts are recommended. After finite amount of matter, a finite amount of tangible reality. 15 years of nurturing within the NPA and a decade as Editor Space is associated with the cardinal aspect, the total ampli- of Galilean Electrodynamics, some of Whitney’s [88] ideas tude, the fraction of the movement; time is associated with are now getting attention. She has been asked to write articles the ordinal aspect, the process of the movement. The practi- for some “mainstream” journals. How did such a thing ever cal distinction between space and time does not refer to a start to happen? For what it may be worth to other NPA peo- pre-established break within reality, but is made possible ple with similar goals, she offered some comments on what thanks to the multiplicity of the material points of the world. has occurred. One bit of guidance that she offered was not to These considerations make it possible to reinterpret the the- try to replace existing theories such as special relativity or ory of relativity, and to re-write the Lorentz equations by general relativity theory but to build upon them in some posi- giving to time a temporary vectorial character.
Recommended publications
  • Pushing Gravitypushing

    Pushing Gravitypushing

    47584 cover 27/5/05 1:38 PM Page 1 Pushing Gravity Edwards (ed.) Since Newton’s time many have proposed that gravitation arises from the absorption by material bodies of minute particles or waves filling space. Such absorption would cause bodies to be pushed into each other's shadows. The principal early proponent of this idea was Georges-Louis Le Sage. This book explores: • The remarkable three hundred-year saga of Le Sage’s theory • Gravitational shielding and the experiments of Q. Majorana • New and recent Le Sage models Pushing Gravity Pu NEW PERSPECTIVES ON The reasons for the present resurgence of Le Sage-type models of gravitation LE SAGE’S THEORY OF GRAVITATION are their simplicity and depth - features desirable in any physical theory.Whereas shing Gravity Newton’s theory and (later) Einstein’s relativity were essentially mathematical descriptions of the motions of bodies in gravitation, Le Sage’s theory attempts to arrive at the very cause of gravity. - from the Preface by Matthew Edwards Apeiron Edited by Matthew R. Edwards Preface To many readers of physics, the history of theories of gravitation may be summed up approximately as follows. After a chaotic period featuring vortex ether models and the like, gravity was at last put on a firm scientific footing by Newton. In the following centuries Newton’s theory saw success after success, until a few unexplained anomalies, such as the advance of the perihelion of Mercury, paved the way for Einstein’s General Relativity. The latter theory has remained without serious challenge to the present day.
  • The Einstein Hoax

    The Einstein Hoax

    The Einstein Hoax The joke's on us "Ein stein" means "one stone", a metaphor for half a brain "The nation has been on the decline mentally and morally since 1870...Behind the Nazi party stands the German people, who elected Hitler after he had in his book and in his speeches made his shameful intentions clear beyond the possibility of misunderstanding. ... The Germans can be killed or constrained after the war, but they cannot be re-educated to a democratic way of thinking and acting..." Albert Einstein This "brilliant" jew is, of course, referring to a people who were almost totally destroyed in a world war, have succeeded in ridding themselves of the scourge of jews, and within half a century rebuilt their country to achieve family incomes almost twice as high as ours "Einstein rarely mentioned those who assisted him. Indeed, in all the famous 1905 papers that he published, only Michele Besso, his friend and sounding board, is mentioned. There is simply no other source material cited in any other of his 1905 papers." "But the 'energy of the atom' is something else again. If you believe that man will someday be able to harness this boundless energy-to drive a great steamship across the ocean on a pint of water, for instance-then, according to Einstein, you are wrong..." 1934, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette This front page article in which Einstein gave an "emphatic denial" regarding the idea of practical applications for the "energy of the atom" demonstrates even further that this jew is a "feeble minded ..
  • Beyond Einstein: Science and Society in the 21 St Century

    Beyond Einstein: Science and Society in the 21 St Century

    1 Beyond Einstein: Science and Society in the 21 st Century By Richard Moody Jr. Abstract Arthur Eddington traveled to Principe in Africa in 1919 with the express purpose of proving Einstein right about general relativity, by attempting to do the impossible. With primitive equipment, operating under unbelievably hostile conditions, Eddington read data during the Eclipse of 1919 to an extreme level of precision. This level of extreme precision has been endorsed by Professor Stephen Hawking and by Scientific American . Eddington’s motives were quite clear; he was an advocate for Einstein, due, in part, to the fact that both men shared the same political beliefs, Pacifism. In his zeal to be both peacemaker and kingmaker, Eddington engaged in corruption and derogation of the scientific data, the scientific method, and much of the scientific community. It surpasses the Piltdown Fraud, a blatant attempt to fool anthropologists into thinking that they had found the “missing link”, as the greatest Deception of 20 th Century science. The hallmark of any professional is consistency, but Einstein recanted on the absence of the ether, general relativity and the Cosmologic Constant. His fundamental failings in physics and math are unknown to the lay public, yet physicists have attempted to portray him as some great genius who towered above mere mortals. They promote as gospel, the agenda driven, unresearched, plagiarized, internet quality 1905 “Miracle Year” papers. The consistent policy of scientists, politicians, the media and the agenda driven public to promote Einstein to icon status has had disastrous repercussions for the National Security of this nation.
  • Electrodynamics

    Electrodynamics

    Sergey N. Аrtekha FOUNDATIONS OF PHYSICS (CRITICAL VIEW): ELECTRODYNAMICS The proposed book is devoted to a systematic analysis of the classical theory of electromagnetic phenomena. Some incorrectnesses for the application of mathematics in theoretical physics are discussed. Many controversial and insufficiently substantiated moments of the classical theory of electromagnetism are analyzed in detail: its foundations, interpretations, mathematical methods and consequences. The book contains an analysis of a number of electrodynamical experiments. All this shows the insufficient validity of the theory of electromagnetic phenomena and the need for serious work on its foundation. Also, the book discusses some alternative ideas related to electromagnetic phenomena. This book can be useful for students, graduate students, teachers, scientific and technical workers and anyone who is interested in the foundations of physics. Table of Contents Preface 3 Introduction 9 1. Electrostatics 12 2. Dielectrics 15 3. Electric current 26 4. Magnetic field 34 5. Equations of Maxwell 42 6. Energy of fields. Force 65 7. Radiation of waves 100 8. Passage of waves through mediums 119 9. Motion of charges in electromagnetic fields 129 10. Magnetism 141 11. Superconductivity 154 Conclusion 156 Appendix: Brief notes to related and alternative theories 158 Afterword 164 References 168 Preface There is nothing reprehensible in not following the herd of those going ahead, but moving in the way it should go. (Seneca) In our time, so-called formal signs came to the forefront as the main criteria for assessing scientific activity (in the past centuries, it would have been just ridiculous!). In the pursuit of good indices (the number of publications and citations), many scientists forget that science “does not tolerate fuss”.
  • What Is the Experimental Basis of Special Relativity?

    What Is the Experimental Basis of Special Relativity?

    03.11.2017 Experimental Basis of Special Relativity [Physics FAQ] — [Copyright] By Tom Roberts (look me up in the FNAL Phonebook) and Siegmar Schleif (email). October 2007. HTML/CSS coding and copyediting: John M. Dlugosz, 2007. What is the experimental basis of Special Relativity? There has been a renaissance in tests of Special Relativity (SR), in part because considerations of quantum gravity imply that SR may well be violated at appropriate scales (very small distance, very high energy). It has been seven years since the last update of this page, and there are over 60 new experiments, many of which are recent, ingenious, and improve bounds on violations of local Lorentz invariance by several or many orders of magnitude. To assist the reader in finding the updates, major changes to this page are in dark blue (tagged with <ins> in HTML). 1. Introduction Domain of Applicability Test Theories of SR Optical Extinction 2. Early experiments (Pre-1905) Roentgen, Eichenwald, Wilson, Rayleigh, Arago, Fizeau, Hoek, Bradley, Airy. 3. Tests of Einstein's Two Postulates Round-Trip Tests of Light Speed Isotropy Michelson and Morley Kennedy and Thorndike Modern Laser/Maser Tests Other One-Way Tests of Light Speed Isotropy Cialdea, Krisher, Champeny, Turner & Hill. Tests of Light Speed from Moving Sources Cosmological Sources: DeSitter, Brecher Terrestrial Sources: Alvaeger, Sadeh, ... Measurements of the Speed of Light, and Other Limits on it NBS Measurements, 1983 Redefinition of the Meter Limits on Variations with Frequency Limits on Photon Mass Tests of the Principle of Relativity and Lorentz Invariance Trouton Noble Other Tests of the Isotropy of Space Hughes-Drever, Prestage, Lamoreaux, Chupp, Phillips, Brillet and Hall.
  • The Eclipse Data from 1919: the Greatest Hoax in 20Th Century Science,” Infinite Energy, 87, 17- 25

    The Eclipse Data from 1919: the Greatest Hoax in 20Th Century Science,” Infinite Energy, 87, 17- 25

    1 Gthegeneralscience Sjournal Reprinted and modified from: Moody, R.H., 2009, “The Eclipse Data from 1919: The Greatest Hoax in 20th Century Science,” Infinite Energy, 87, 17- 25 The Eclipse Data From 1919: The Greatest Hoax in 20th Century Science By Richard Moody Jr. Abstract Prior to 1919, general relativity was an obscure theory by a rising star in physics, Albert Einstein. Based on the perceived need to test this complex and intriguing concept, it was held as gospel that the sunlight passing by the sun should be bent by the gravitational attraction of the sun, something known to Sir Isaac Newton and modified by Einstein. According to prevailing wisdom, this should be observable during a total solar eclipse when the shielding of the sun’s light permitted the observation of light from distant stars being “bent” around the sun. In an effort to play the role of peacemaker and kingmaker, Arthur Eddington traveled to Principe in Africa with the express purpose of proving Einstein right. Prior to that, he was an advocate for Einstein, due, in part, to the fact that both men shared the same political beliefs, Pacifism. In his zeal to be both peacemaker and kingmaker (Eddington wanted to be known as the man who discovered Einstein), Eddington engaged in corruption and derogation of the scientific data, the scientific method, and much of the scientific community. To this day, this completely manufactured data set is quoted by 2 prominent scientists and the organs of publication. It surpasses the Piltdown Fraud, an attempt by a “charlatan” to fool anthropologists into thinking they had found the “missing” link, as the greatest hoax of 20th and 21st Century science.