DOCSLIB.ORG

American Tree Farm System – Landscape Management Plan for the State of Georgia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
American Tree Farm System – Landscape Management Plan for the State of Georgia AMERICAN TREE FARM SYSTEM® LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT PLAN State of Georgia i Landscape Management Plan Creation Plan Development and Composition The American Forest Foundation (AFF), in conjunction with Southern Forestry Consultants, Inc.(SFC), developed the original components, outlines, structure, and drafts of the Landscape Management Plan (LMP) and the associated geodatabase. AFF and SFC also worked cooperatively to evaluate and incorporate edits, comments, and modifications that resulted in the final LMP and geodatabase. Natural Resource Professional Support Committee AFF consulted regularly with staff from the Georgia Forestry Commission (GFC) to seek their input on various thematic, structural, and scientific components through multiple drafts of this LMP. Additionally, GFC staff facilitated access to and procurement of publicly available geospatial data during the development of the geodatabase. Additional Stakeholders AFF also sought input from a variety of additional stakeholders with expertise in the natural resources, planning, certification, and regulatory disciplines. Like the Support Committee, these additional stakeholders did not necessarily endorse all components of the LMP, nor does AFF imply a consensus was reached. These additional stakeholders included: • American Forest Management • Southern Regional Extension Forestry • Association of Consulting Foresters • The Nature Conservancy • Belle W. Baruch Foundation • University of Georgia • Bishop Brothers Forestry Consultants • US Army – Fort Jackson • Boise Cascade Company • US Fish & Wildlife Service • Four W Forestry Group • USDA Farm Service Agency (FSA) • Georgia Conservancy • USDA Forest Service • Georgia Department of Natural Resources • USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service • Georgia Farm Bureau (NRCS) • Georgia Forestry Commission • WestRock Company • Georgia-Pacific Corporation • Weyerhaeuser Company • Georgia Tree Farm • Georgia Wildlife Federation • Interfor Corporation • International Paper Company • Longleaf Alliance • National Wild Turkey Federation • Palmetto Conservation Foundation • Pee Dee Land Trust • Pinova Solutions • Preservation Tree, LLC • Quality Deer Management Association ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.1. Forest Resource Professionals .......................................................................................... 3 1.2. Adaptive Management ....................................................................................................... 4 1.3. 2015-2020 ATFS Standards of Sustainability within the LMP ........................................... 5 1.4. Forest Stewardship Program Standards within the LMP ................................................. 12 1.5. A Forester’s Field Guide for Using the Landscape Management Plan with Landowners . 13 1.6. A Landowner’s Field Guide for Using the Landscape Management Plan......................... 15 2. SITE SPECIFIC CHARACTERIZATION THROUGH GEODATABASE TOOLS ............................ 18 2.1. Instructions for Use.......................................................................................................... 18 2.2. Geodatabase Layer Descriptions ..................................................................................... 18 3. ECOREGIONS (LEVEL III) ........................................................................................................ 26 3.1. Southwestern Appalachians ............................................................................................ 26 3.1.1. Forest Types Within Ecoregion .............................................................................. 29 3.2. Ridge and Valley .............................................................................................................. 29 3.2.1. Forest Types Within Ecoregion .............................................................................. 29 3.3. Blue Ridge ....................................................................................................................... 29 3.3.1. Forest Types Within Ecoregion .............................................................................. 30 3.4. Piedmont ......................................................................................................................... 30 3.4.1. Forest Types Within Ecoregion .............................................................................. 30 3.5. Southeastern Plains ........................................................................................................ 30 3.5.1. Forest Types Within Ecoregion .............................................................................. 31 3.6. Southern Coastal Plain .................................................................................................... 31 3.6.1. Forest Types Within Ecoregion .............................................................................. 31 3.7. Ecoregions Application to Landscape Management Plan ................................................ 32 4. HYDROLOGIC CATEGORIES ................................................................................................... 34 5. OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................. 36 5.1. Common Landscape Objectives ...................................................................................... 36 5.1.1. Forest Land Conservation and Retention .............................................................. 36 5.1.2. Support Healthy Forest Products Industry ............................................................. 43 5.1.3. Watershed Protection and Restoration ................................................................. 44 5.1.4. Wildlife Management and Protection/Biodiversity ................................................ 47 5.1.5. Forest Ecological Restoration ................................................................................ 51 5.1.6. Non-Native and Invasive Species (NNIS) and Nuisance Species Management .... 52 5.1.7. Supporting Military Bases Through REPI and Sentinel Landscapes ..................... 58 5.1.8. Air Quality .............................................................................................................. 59 5.1.9. Fire Management .................................................................................................. 60 5.2. Landowner Objectives ..................................................................................................... 62 5.2.1. Forest Health Management ................................................................................... 62 5.2.2. Conservation .......................................................................................................... 65 5.2.3. Economic Return ................................................................................................... 66 5.2.4. Wildlife Management and Protection .................................................................... 70 5.2.5. Recreation ............................................................................................................. 72 5.2.6. Aesthetics .............................................................................................................. 73 5.2.7. Legacy Planning .................................................................................................... 74 iii 6. COMMON GEORGIA FOREST TYPES...................................................................................... 79 6.1. Loblolly Pine Dominant .................................................................................................... 84 6.2. Longleaf Pine Dominant .................................................................................................. 84 6.3. Shortleaf Pine Dominant.................................................................................................. 85 6.4. Slash Pine Dominant ....................................................................................................... 86 6.5. Pine/Hardwood Mixed ..................................................................................................... 86 6.6. Upland Hardwoods .......................................................................................................... 87 6.7. Bottomland Hardwoods ................................................................................................... 87 6.7.1. Tupelo-Cypress Mixed ............................................................................................ 88 6.7.2. Mixed Floodplain ................................................................................................... 89 6.7.3. Elm/Ash/Cottonwood ............................................................................................ 89 7. FOREST RESOURCES ............................................................................................................. 91 7.1. Common Forest Resources.............................................................................................. 91 7.1.1. Conservation Incentives ........................................................................................ 91 7.1.2. Ecosystem Services ............................................................................................... 95 7.1.3. Historical and Cultural Sites .................................................................................. 95
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ecophysiology and Genetic Diversity of Hard Maples Indigenous to Eastern North America Rolston St Hilaire Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1998 Ecophysiology and genetic diversity of hard maples indigenous to eastern North America Rolston St Hilaire Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Hilaire, Rolston St, "Ecophysiology and genetic diversity of hard maples indigenous to eastern North America " (1998). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 11810. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/11810 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UME films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter fece, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the qualily of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UME a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marlboro Mixer
    Sept/Oct 2013 Volume 10, Issue 5 The Marlboro Mixer A FREE newsletter for the town of Marlboro, Vermont. 31st Annual Marlboro Community Fair, September 14th!! In this Issue: Marlboro Cares….2 The Fair is almost here! Please join us on Saturday, September 14th. Select Board……….3 This year we are celebrating “The Makers of Marlboro,” all of those Store…………………..3 friends and neighbors who build, create, craft, make, sing, strum, write, Apples………….…….4 repair, harvest, raise, bake, imagine... MES……………………5 Poetry……………..…6 This year we are very glad to have a number of demonstrations of the skill and ingenuity that make Energy……………….6 our Town such a unique place. The Arts & Crafts Tent will host exhibits of wool yarn spinning, toy VPL……………..…….7 making, an oral history, tool sharpening, video productions, and others. Come learn about birds of prey and enjoy a hard cider or maple syrup tasting in the Ag Tent. We encourage everyone to bring flowers, fruits, and vegetables, as well as jams and beers, for display and to enter to win prizes - and entries from all ages are welcome, so please come and bring the best of your harvest. We are glad once again to be hosting a baking contest with prizes donated by King Arthur Flour, with entries being accepted up to 9:30 AM. The stage will be packed with great music all day long, including Rich Grumbine, Singcrony, Michael Hertz, T. Fredric and Lillian Jones, Jesse Lepkoff and friends, the MacArthur Family, Julia Slone, and Red Heart the Ticker. We will have a poetry reading at 3:00 and wrap up the day with A FREE newsletter the Fair Song at 4:00.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Weeds of the Appalachian Region
    $10 $10 PB1785 PB1785 Invasive Weeds Invasive Weeds of the of the Appalachian Appalachian Region Region i TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments……………………………………...i How to use this guide…………………………………ii IPM decision aid………………………………………..1 Invasive weeds Grasses …………………………………………..5 Broadleaves…………………………………….18 Vines………………………………………………35 Shrubs/trees……………………………………48 Parasitic plants………………………………..70 Herbicide chart………………………………………….72 Bibliography……………………………………………..73 Index………………………………………………………..76 AUTHORS Rebecca M. Koepke-Hill, Extension Assistant, The University of Tennessee Gregory R. Armel, Assistant Professor, Extension Specialist for Invasive Weeds, The University of Tennessee Robert J. Richardson, Assistant Professor and Extension Weed Specialist, North Caro- lina State University G. Neil Rhodes, Jr., Professor and Extension Weed Specialist, The University of Ten- nessee ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank all the individuals and organizations who have contributed their time, advice, financial support, and photos to the crea- tion of this guide. We would like to specifically thank the USDA, CSREES, and The Southern Region IPM Center for their extensive support of this pro- ject. COVER PHOTO CREDITS ii 1. Wavyleaf basketgrass - Geoffery Mason 2. Bamboo - Shawn Askew 3. Giant hogweed - Antonio DiTommaso 4. Japanese barberry - Leslie Merhoff 5. Mimosa - Becky Koepke-Hill 6. Periwinkle - Dan Tenaglia 7. Porcelainberry - Randy Prostak 8. Cogongrass - James Miller 9. Kudzu - Shawn Askew Photo credit note: Numbers in parenthesis following photo captions refer to the num- bered photographer list on the back cover. HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE Tabs: Blank tabs can be found at the top of each page. These can be custom- ized with pen or marker to best suit your method of organization. Examples: Infestation present On bordering land No concern Uncontrolled Treatment initiated Controlled Large infestation Medium infestation Small infestation Control Methods: Each mechanical control method is represented by an icon.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Invasive Plants and Pests of Illinois
    MANAGEMENT OF INVASIVE PLANTS AND PESTS OF ILLINOIS AUTHORS Tricia Bethke, Forest Pest Outreach Coordinator, The Morton Arboretum Christopher Evans, Extension Forester, UIUC NRES ORIGINAL AUTHOR Karla Gage, Southern Illinois University 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This publication was funded, in part, through a grant from the Illinois Forestry Development Council (ifdc.nres.illinois.edu). Management of Invasive Plants and Pests of Illinois is an update and expansion of the original Management of Invasive Plants of Southern Illinois. The authors wish to acknowledge the Illinois Wildlife Preservation Fund, which supported the creation of the original document. The authors wish to thank The Morton Arboretum and Kurt Dreisilker, Mark Hochsprung, Mark McKinney and Clair Ryan for their edits and review of this document. The authors wish to thank The Morton Arboretum’s Natural Areas Conservation Training Program, which is generously funded by the Tellabs Foundation, for support, in part, of the publication of this guide. The authors wish to thank the USDA Animal Plant and Health Inspection Service which supported, in part, the update and publication of this document. The authors wish to thank the River to River Cooperative Weed Management Area and Kevin Rohling for assisting in the development of this publication. The Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences and Extension Forestry at the University of Illinois would like to thank and acknowledge the Renewable Resources Extension Act (RREA) and the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture
    [Show full text]
  • Phenology Calendar (PDF)
    Phenology Calendar Treatment for Common Invasive Plants in Northeast Illinois Name January February March April May June July August September October November December Mowing Do Not Mow Flowering Spray foliar herbicide Burn Alliaria petiolata (garlic mustard) Hand pull, dig Spray herbicide on cut stems Alnus glutinosa (black alder) Special Thanks to: Ed Hedborn - The Morton Arboretum Floyd Catchpole - Will County FPD Rob Littiken - TNC Kankakee Sands Becky Collings - The Field Museum Anthriscus sylvestris (wild chervil) Berberis thunbergii (Japanese barberry) Centaurea stoebe ssp. micranthos (syn. Centaurea maculosa /bieberstein /steube ) (spotted knapweed) Conium maculatum (poison hemlock) Dipsacus laciniatus (cut-leaf teasel) Dipsacus sylvestris /fullonum (common teasel) Eleagnus angustifolia (Russian olive) Elaeagnus umbellatus (Autumn olive) 1 Phenology Calendar Treatment for Common Invasive Plants in Northeast Illinois Name January February March April May June July August September October November December Mowing Do Not Mow Flowering Spray foliar herbicide Euonymus alatus (burning bush) Burn Hand pull, dig Spray herbicide on cut stems Euonymus fortunei (winter creeper) Euphorbia esula (leafy spurge) Frangula alnus (syn. Rhamnus frangula ) (glossy buckthorn) Hemerocallis spp. (daylily) Humulus japonicus (Japanese hops) Lespedeza sericea /cuneata (silky bush clover) Lonicera maackii (Amur honeysuckle) Lonicera tartarica -xylosteum complex (Tatarian honeysuckle) Lotus corniculatus (bird’s foot trefoil) Lysimachia nummularia (moneywort
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Illinois Native Trees
    Technical Forestry Bulletin · NRES-102 Checklist of Illinois Native Trees Jay C. Hayek, Extension Forestry Specialist Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Sciences Updated May 2019 This Technical Forestry Bulletin serves as a checklist of Tree species prevalence (Table 2), or commonness, and Illinois native trees, both angiosperms (hardwoods) and gym- county distribution generally follows Iverson et al. (1989) and nosperms (conifers). Nearly every species listed in the fol- Mohlenbrock (2002). Additional sources of data with respect lowing tables† attains tree-sized stature, which is generally to species prevalence and county distribution include Mohlen- defined as having a(i) single stem with a trunk diameter brock and Ladd (1978), INHS (2011), and USDA’s The Plant Da- greater than or equal to 3 inches, measured at 4.5 feet above tabase (2012). ground level, (ii) well-defined crown of foliage, and(iii) total vertical height greater than or equal to 13 feet (Little 1979). Table 2. Species prevalence (Source: Iverson et al. 1989). Based on currently accepted nomenclature and excluding most minor varieties and all nothospecies, or hybrids, there Common — widely distributed with high abundance. are approximately 184± known native trees and tree-sized Occasional — common in localized patches. shrubs found in Illinois (Table 1). Uncommon — localized distribution or sparse. Rare — rarely found and sparse. Nomenclature used throughout this bulletin follows the Integrated Taxonomic Information System —the ITIS data- Basic highlights of this tree checklist include the listing of 29 base utilizes real-time access to the most current and accept- native hawthorns (Crataegus), 21 native oaks (Quercus), 11 ed taxonomy based on scientific consensus.
    [Show full text]
  • June 23, 2012
    Maryland Native Plant Society Plant Lists We offer these lists to individuals and groups to enhance the enjoyment and study of plants of different locations in Maryland and nearby states. Their accuracy has not been verified by the Maryland Native Plant Society. SAVAGE RIVER STATE FOREST, GARRETT COUNTY, MD This list records plants seen during a field trip to the Savage River State Forest on June 23, 2012. Field trip led by Wade Dorsey and Liz McDowell. Plant list by Liz McDowell. Nomenclature follows the USDA Plant Database at http://plants.usda.gov (January 2012). Synonyms are footnoted for some species. Acer pensylvanicum Striped maple Aceraceae Acer rubrum Red maple Aceraceae Acer saccharum Sugar maple Aceraceae Achillea millefolium Yarrow Asteraceae Actaea racemosa1 Black cohosh Ranunculaceae Alliaria petiolata Garlic mustard Brassicaceae Amelanchier sp. Shadbush Rosaceae Apocynum cannabinum Indian hemp Apocynaceae Arabis canadensis Sicklepod Brassicaceae Athyrium filix-femina Lady fern Dryopteridaceae Barbarea vulgaris Common wintercress Brassicaceae Berberis thunbergii Japanese barberry Berberidaceae Betula lenta Black birch Betulaceae Carex platyphylla Broad-leaved sedge Cyperaceae Carya glabra Pignut hickory Juglandaceae Carya ovata Shagbark hickory Juglandaceae Castanea dentata American chestnut Fagaceae Chelidonium majus Celandine Papaveraceae Circaea lutetiana Enchanter’s nightshade Onagraceae Clinopodium vulgare2 Wild basil Lamiaceae Cypripedium acaule Pink lady’s-slipper Orchidaceae Dennstaedtia punctilobula Hay-scented
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Flora and Vegetation Classification of the South Atlantic Coastal Plain Limestone Forest Association of Central Georgia
    VASCULAR FLORA AND VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION OF THE SOUTH ATLANTIC COASTAL PLAIN LIMESTONE FOREST ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL GEORGIA by PATRICK SUMNER LYNCH (Under the Direction of J.L. Hamrick) ABSTRACT The South Atlantic Coastal Plain Limestone forest is a globally imperiled (G2) forest association known only from the upper Coastal Plain of central Georgia. These calcareous forest communities support diverse floristic assemblages unique among the Georgia Coastal Plain, but have not been subject to detailed floristic study. I conducted a comprehensive floristic inventory, multivariate community analyses and floristic quality assessments to document composition, elucidate community structure and underlying physiographic regimes, and assess habitat integrity for seven sites in Houston, Bleckley and Twiggs counties. Community analyses revealed twelve community types within two floristically defined domains corresponding to uplands and slopes, and bottomlands, respectively, and governed largely by moisture content and degree of inclination. Floristic quality assessments revealed varying degrees of floristic quality and habitat integrity corresponding primarily to local physiography and disturbance history. Floristic inventory recovered 339 vascular plant taxa representing 218 genera in 98 families, including 17 rare Georgia species. INDEX WORDS: Limestone forest, community analysis, floristic inventory, floristic quality assessment, Georgia, Coastal Plain. VASCULAR FLORA AND VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION OF THE SOUTH ATLANTIC COASTAL PLAIN LIMESTONE FOREST ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL GEORGIA by PATRICK SUMNER LYNCH B.S., The University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 2006 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2010 © 2012 Patrick Sumner Lynch All Rights Reserved VASCULAR FLORA AND VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION OF THE SOUTH ATLANTIC COASTAL PLAIN LIMESTONE FOREST ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL GEORGIA by PATRICK SUMNER LYNCH Major Professor: J.L.
    [Show full text]
  • HOW to Eat Crabs!
    washingtonFAMILY.com JULY 2019 HOW to Eat Crabs! STUDENT-CENTERED LEARNING AT ONENESS-FAMILY SCHOOL Kenwood School Dedicated to Educational Excellence for over 50 years BEFORE & AFTER SCHOOL CARE KINDERGARTEN THRU 6TH GRADE LEARNING • Small class sizes — allows one-on-one instruction with the teacher • Follows and exceeds Fairfax County curriculum • Standardized testing twice a year to evaluate school ability and achievement; no SOL’s • Integration of reading, writing, oral language, phonics, science, social studies, spelling and math • Extracurricular classes in computers, music, gym and Spanish • Manners and strong social skills are developed in everyday interactions Kindergarten cut o November 30th play • On-site gym for indoor exercise Kindergarten • Daily indoor/outdoor free play cut o • Spacious playground November 30th Extras • Daily interactions with your child’s teacher • Invention Convention, Science Fairs, Fall Festival • Children are able to excel at their own pace • Hot catered lunches and snacks provided • Variety of educational fi eld trips throughout the year • Summer / Holiday Camps • Centrally located — minutes from downtown and major highways 703-256-4711 4955 Sunset Lane Annondale, VA [email protected] www.kenwoodschool.com mommy & me JULY 17TH jokes & WEDNESDAY · 11AM COMMUNITY ROOM juggles Enjoy Mommy’s Lounge while your children play and nurture their magical & creative side. Interactive entertainment provided by Mandy Dalton. Enjoy exclusive discounts from retailers and refreshments provided by Starbucks Coffee and Auntie Anne’s Pretzel Perfect/Planet Smoothie I-95 & I-295 | 6800 Oxon Hill Road | (301) 567-3880 | TangerOutlets.com 51488_NAT_Mommy&Me_PrintAd_7x10_FIN.indd 1 6/19/19 1:24 PM CONTENTS JULY 2019 ON THE COVER STUDENTS AT THE ONENESS-FAMILY SCHOOL Keep your child learning all summer long.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 DENDROLOGY SPECIES LIST 1 Aceraceae (Sapindaceae
    2019 DENDROLOGY SPECIES LIST Family Genus Specific Epithet Common Name 1 Aceraceae (Sapindaceae) Acer floridanum Florida sugar maple 2 Aceraceae (Sapindaceae) Acer negundo boxelder 3 Aceraceae (Sapindaceae) Acer rubrum red maple 4 Anacardiaceae Toxicodendron radicans poison ivy 5 Annonaceae Asimina triloba pawpaw 6 Apocynaceae Trachelospermum difforme climbing dogbane 7 Aquifoliaceae Ilex decidua deciduous holly 8 Aquifoliaceae Ilex opaca American holly 9 Aquifoliaceae Ilex verticillata common winterberry 10 Aquifoliaceae Ilex vomitoria yaupon 11 Araliaceae Aralia spinosa devil's walking-stick 12 Arecaceae Sabal minor palmetto 13 Asteraceae Baccharis halimifolia saltbush 14 Berberidaceae Nandina domestica nandina 15 Betulaceae Betula nigra river birch 16 Betulaceae Carpinus caroliniana musclewood 17 Betulaceae Ostrya virginiana eastern hophornbeam 18 Bignoniaceae Bignonia capreolata crossvine 19 Bignoniaceae Campsis radicans trumpet creeper 20 Bignoniaceae Macfadyena unguis-cati catclaw vine 21 Bromeliaceae Tillandsia usneoides Spanish moss 22 Caprifoliaceae Lonicera japonica Japanese honeysuckle 23 Caprifoliaceae Lonicera sempervirens coral honeysuckle 24 Caprifoliaceae Sambucus nigra ssp. canadensis American black elderberry 25 Caprifoliaceae Viburnum dentatum arrowwood 26 Caprifoliaceae Viburnum rufidulum rusty blackhaw 27 Celastraceae Euonymus americanus strawberry bush 28 Clusiaceae Hypericum hypericoides St. Andrew’s cross 29 Cornaceae Cornus drummondii roughleaf dogwood 30 Cornaceae Cornus florida flowering dogwood 31 Cupressaceae
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of the Effects of Sesbania Drummondii on the Hepatic Cytochrome P-450 Monooxygenase Systems of Chickens and Rats
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1990 A Comparative Study of the Effects of Sesbania Drummondii on the Hepatic Cytochrome P-450 Monooxygenase Systems of Chickens and Rats. Marcy Iva Banton Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Banton, Marcy Iva, "A Comparative Study of the Effects of Sesbania Drummondii on the Hepatic Cytochrome P-450 Monooxygenase Systems of Chickens and Rats." (1990). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 4970. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/4970 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wingfoot Clan - August 4, 1966 - Page 3
    .... - .......·-· , z <1,; .... I.042,'-•L.,· .042042·042.... - - ./1.- 1·415 -<&2:- ./ I ...... + 2./1 "ING= :•CIT<1••tr:SrA r• LAN 1'' I '4 I ' ..1 '1 t*» ., « Ii U Y,9'* TH" 0/' EAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY AKRON EDITION ..»7 *f 44 ** V 01. 5 Akron, Ohio (3.-ti•ip August 4, 1966 No.31 :<fi) -- S THIS THE CLUB? Pam- e Moore ponders as she Teys a big problem - how 'e:...v» . Sales & Earnings Again get this giant ball in the - . .... 4....'::, " Pamela is just one of I + 07:, empl()yes' children to : n a weekly Rolf ..r. - .... e the others and Top All Previous Records /./. 4 2 2 b problems, turn .. ,'. The highest sales and earnings in history Goodyear's record quarterly earnings of •lit . 1- $33,589,000 were equivalent to 93 cents a ..'-34 i: .4/. -- were achieved by Goodyear during the first + - 1 - .- .-1-&44-.00 . I i .-'.*6 9, ..G.-.-'1•.1.•=••'- .... 4**4 42.4.-. six months and the second quarter of 1966, share, based on 35,792,174 shares outstand- ing June 30, 1966. They were 17.4 per cent \ 1.A- Russell DeYoung, chairman and chief ex- ,/). 6-... ecutive officer, announcd. higher than the $28,606,000, or 80 cents a share, recorded in the second quarter of 1965. Spurred by gains in virtually all lines of 1 The previous record for quarterly earnings " .'*V- ........ activity worldwide, the company recorded 41 I. was $31,215,000, achieved in the last three • six-month sales of $1,220,472,000 and net aA months of 1965.
    [Show full text]