DOCSLIB.ORG

Twentieth Century Fox and Others V. Sky UK and Others

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Twentieth Century Fox and Others V. Sky UK and Others COPYRIGHT Twentieth Century Fox and Others v. Sky UK and Others UK High Court, [2105] EWHC 1082 (Ch), 28 April 2015 The ruling concerns the technology used by ‘Popcorn Time’ websites, which offer software tools allowing users to access unlicensed TV and film content; the decision marks another step forward in the maturing body of case law relating to site blocking. The High Court has for the first injunctive relief under s.97A was dealt with at a hearing. time issued a Court order blocking made by Hollywood film studios ‘Popcorn Time’ is an open source access to ‘Popcorn Time’ sites, against BT in relation to the application that can be following an application by six Newzbin2 website. Newzbin was a downloaded and installed by the major Hollywood film studios, website that indexed and made user onto their computer device who are all members of the available unlicensed film and other from a Popcorn Time application Motion Picture Association content for users to download. source (‘PTAS’) website. Popcorn (Twentieth Century Fox and Others After the movie studios secured Time apps can be downloaded for v. Sky UK and Others [2105] injunctive relief against Newzbin free and can be used to browse, EWHC 1082 (Ch)). Popcorn Time on the basis of copyright search and locate films and TV sites offer software tools that infringement (Twentieth Century content from third party websites provide access to unlicensed TV Fox v. Newzbin [2010] EWHC 608 without users having to return to and film content, enabling the user (Ch)), the operators of the website the Popcorn Time site from which to access an up-to-date database of relocated and created a new they originally downloaded the unauthorised content quickly and website (Newzbin2) offshore and tool. It acts as a BitTorrent client, easily. The Popcorn Time interface out of the jurisdiction, making it collecting pieces of broken up film presents thumbnails and film titles very difficult for the studios to content together and assembling in a similar manner to lawful enforce the judgment they had them into a content file for catalogue sites like Netflix, using obtained. The studios sought an viewing, with the addition of BitTorrent technology to download alternative route to enforce their media player software, an index illegal content. rights, using the then seldom used /catalogue of titles and images and The judgment means that the five s.97A right in a test case to block descriptions of titles. Popcorn leading internet service providers access to the content via the ISP. Time applications locate torrents (‘ISPs’) in the UK are all required The result was the decision in by searching catalogues of existing to block customers’ access to the Twentieth Century Fox & Ors v. BT, websites that host those torrents. site. The Order, which was granting the movie studios the Once a work is selected by the unopposed by the ISPs, was the relief they sought under s.97A, and user, the application seeks the most latest to be granted under section effectively laying down a template popular and/or highest quality 97A Copyright, Designs and that rightsholders in a range of version of the content chosen, and Patents Act 1988 (‘CDPA’), which industries could deploy in the streams as it downloads the is a cause of action that has been future. The movie studios content using the BitTorrent deployed effectively by media subsequently obtained similar protocol. The user may start rightsowners over the past few orders against the UK’s other watching the content as soon as the years to control and block the use major ISPs. process (known as sequential of infringing content online. It is a Since then, copyright owners downloading) starts. You do not notable decision on the nuances of from a variety of sectors have have to wait for the completion of the technology used by ‘Popcorn sought and been granted similar the download. The content Time’ sites, which advances the orders, mostly in relation to available using the Popcorn Time rapidly developing body of case streaming and BitTorrent sites. applications is constantly updated law in this area of copyright law. as they link to a website that they Order sought use as a source of update Background The application sought in this case, information (‘SUI website’). Section 97A CDPA (‘s.97A’) entitles which was originally brought on Popcorn Time sites often feature copyright owners to apply to the paper, related to nine target glossy, user-friendly interfaces and Court to seek injunctive relief websites, which consisted of four popular content. The typically high against ISPs who are hosting streaming and BitTorrent websites quality design of Popcorn Time material that infringes their (which the presiding judge, Birss J, sites and user-friendly experience copyright, where the ISPs have determined raised issues that had means that there is the potential ‘actual knowledge’ of the already been dealt with for them to be confused as being infringement. S.97A implements comprehensively in previous cases lawful, legitimate sites. Article 8(3) of the Copyright and could therefore be dealt with Directive (2001/29/EC) in England on paper) and five ‘Popcorn Time’ Decision and Wales. sites, which, Birss J held, raised new Birss J ordered the defendant ISPs The first application for and complex issues that had to be to block access to all the target 08 E-Commerce Law Reports - volume 15 issue 03 COPYRIGHT websites. the operators of the host However, the judge ruled that there Although the nature of the websites/those who place was again no communication to ‘Popcorn Time’ technology was infringing content on such the public because it was the different to BitTorrent sites, the websites. Popcorn Time application that Court followed the same criteria made the content available at a that had been laid down in the Communication to the public time and place of the user’s Newzbin2 case for establishing Birss J agreed that the Popcorn choosing, not the SUI websites. jurisdiction under s.97A, namely: Time application is used in order 1. that the ISPs are service to watch infringing content on the Authorisation providers; internet and not really used in The movie studios argued that the 2. that the users and/or the order to watch lawfully available operators of both the PTAS and operators of the target websites content. SUI websites were infringing infringe copyright; However, the judge did not agree copyright in the protected works 3. that the users and/or the that there had been a by authorising the infringing operators of the target websites use ‘communication to the public’ communication to the public the services of the ISPs to do this; under s.20(2)(b) CDPA in respect (pursuant to s.16(2) CDPA) by the and of the Popcorn Time sites. The operators of the host websites 4. that the ISPs have actual judge held that, with regard to the and/or by those who placed the knowledge of this. Popcorn Time sites, it was the infringing content on the host If the above jurisdictional application itself that was running websites. requirements are made out, the on the user’s computer, which Birss J considered that the court then has to go on to consider presented to the user catalogued Popcorn Time application was a whether an order is appropriate in and indexed connections to the technical means necessarily used by the circumstances and on what sources of the copies. The PTAS users to infringe the copyright in terms the order is to be made. site did not communicate any the content. The tool is used to Birss J found no difficulty in copyright works to anyone. There find, access and collect the pieces establishing points (1) and (4), and was no transmission (or re- of the content files using the that, in relation to the streaming transmission) of a copyright work. BitTorrent protocol and to watch and BitTorrent sites, there was a As a PTAS site did not contain any the protected work via the media clear basis for granting the order information about any work, it player. Infringement of copyright sought for the same reasons as had could therefore not be was inevitable when Popcorn Time been considered in detail in ‘communicating a work.’ The site was used. The operators of the previous cases. instead made available a tool, PTAS and SUI websites had taken However, Birss J held that namely the Popcorn Time no steps to prevent infringement. questions (2) and (3) were less application, which could be used to Instead, they ensured that the clear in relation to the Popcorn retrieve content from third party infringing content available on Time websites. linked sites. The operators of the Popcorn Time was constantly The studios submitted that the PTAS sites were consequently updated. operators of the Popcorn Time facilitating the making available of The judge said that these points websites used the services of the the content by providing the tool. would be relevant to an argument ISPs to infringe copyright in Birss J considered that the scope of that the suppliers of the Popcorn protected film and TV works by: the act of communication to the Time applications were authorising 1. communicating the works to public could not be stretched as far acts of infringement by users. the public contrary to s 20(2)(b) as to cover the operation of a site However, the claimants’ case was CDPA; that simply made the Popcorn that the operators of the PTAS and 2. authorising the infringing Time application itself available for SUI websites were authorising the communication to the public download.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cisco SCA BB Protocol Reference Guide
    Cisco Service Control Application for Broadband Protocol Reference Guide Protocol Pack #60 August 02, 2018 Cisco Systems, Inc. www.cisco.com Cisco has more than 200 offices worldwide. Addresses, phone numbers, and fax numbers are listed on the Cisco website at www.cisco.com/go/offices. THE SPECIFICATIONS AND INFORMATION REGARDING THE PRODUCTS IN THIS MANUAL ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. ALL STATEMENTS, INFORMATION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THIS MANUAL ARE BELIEVED TO BE ACCURATE BUT ARE PRESENTED WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. USERS MUST TAKE FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR APPLICATION OF ANY PRODUCTS. THE SOFTWARE LICENSE AND LIMITED WARRANTY FOR THE ACCOMPANYING PRODUCT ARE SET FORTH IN THE INFORMATION PACKET THAT SHIPPED WITH THE PRODUCT AND ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY THIS REFERENCE. IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO LOCATE THE SOFTWARE LICENSE OR LIMITED WARRANTY, CONTACT YOUR CISCO REPRESENTATIVE FOR A COPY. The Cisco implementation of TCP header compression is an adaptation of a program developed by the University of California, Berkeley (UCB) as part of UCB’s public domain version of the UNIX operating system. All rights reserved. Copyright © 1981, Regents of the University of California. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER WARRANTY HEREIN, ALL DOCUMENT FILES AND SOFTWARE OF THESE SUPPLIERS ARE PROVIDED “AS IS” WITH ALL FAULTS. CISCO AND THE ABOVE-NAMED SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THOSE OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT OR ARISING FROM A COURSE OF DEALING, USAGE, OR TRADE PRACTICE. IN NO EVENT SHALL CISCO OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, LOST PROFITS OR LOSS OR DAMAGE TO DATA ARISING OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THIS MANUAL, EVEN IF CISCO OR ITS SUPPLIERS HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
    [Show full text]
  • Antifragile White Paper Draft 3.Pages
    Piracy as an Antifragile System tech WP 01/2015 July 2015 Executive Summary Attacks on the piracy economy have thus far been unsuccessful. The piracy community has not only shown resilience to these attacks, but has also become more sophisticated and resilient as a result of them. Systems that show this characteristic response to ex- ternal stressors are defined as antifragile. Traditional centralized attacks are not only ineffective against such systems, but are counter-productive. These systems are not impervious to attacks, however. Decentralized attacks that warp the connections between nodes destroy the system from within. Some system-based attacks on piracy have been attempted, but lacked the technology required to be effec- tive. A new technology, CustosTech, built on the Bitcoin blockchain, attacks the system by turning pirates against each other. The technology enables and incentivizes anyone in the world to anonymously act as an informant, disclosing the identity of the first in- fringer – the pirate uploader. This internal decentralized attack breaks the incentive structures governing the uploader-downloader relationship, and thus provides a sus- tainable deterrent to piracy. Table of Contents Introduction to Antifragility 1 Features of Antifragile Systems 1 Piracy as an Antifragile System 2 Sophisticated Pirates 3 Popcorn Time 5 Attacking 5 Antifragile Systems 5 Attacking Piracy 5 Current Approaches 6 New Tools 6 How it Works 7 Conclusion 7 White paper 01/2015 Introduction to Antifragility Antifragility refers to a system that becomes bet- ter, or stronger, in response to shocks or attacks. Nassim Taleb developed the term1 to explain sys- tems that were not only resilient, but also thrived under stress.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloading Copyrighted Materials
    What you need to know before... Downloading Copyrighted Materials Including movies, TV shows, music, digital books, software and interactive games The Facts and Consequences Who monitors peer-to-peer file sharing? What are the consequences at UAF The Motion Picture Association of America for violators of this policy? (MPAA), Home Box Office, and other copyright Student Services at UAF takes the following holders monitor file-sharing on the Internet minimum actions when the policy is violated: for the illegal distribution of their copyrighted 1st Offense: contents. Once identified they issue DMCA Loss of Internet access until issue is resolved. (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) take-down 2nd Offense: notices to the ISP (Internet Service Provider), in Loss of Internet access pending which the University of Alaska is considered as resolution and a $100 fee assessment. one, requesting the infringement be stopped. If 3rd Offense: not stopped, lawsuit against the user is possible. Loss of Internet access pending resolution and a $250 fee assessment. What is UAF’s responsibility? 4th, 5th, 6th Offense: Under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and Loss of Internet access pending resolution and Higher Education Opportunity Act, university a $500 fee assessment. administrators are obligated to track these infractions and preserve relevent logs in your What are the Federal consequences student record. This means that if your case goes for violators? to court, your record may be subpoenaed as The MPAA, HBO and similar organizations are evidence. Since illegal file sharing also drains becoming more and more aggressive in finding bandwidth, costing schools money and slowing and prosecuting alleged offenders in criminal Internet connections, for students trying to use court.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Peer-To-Peer Systems
    A Study of Peer-to-Peer Systems JIA, Lu A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Philosophy in Information Engineering The Chinese University of Hong Kong August 2009 Abstract of thesis entitled: A Study of Peer-to-Peer Systems Submitted by JIA, Lu for the degree of Master of Philosophy at The Chinese University of Hong Kong in June 2009 Peer-to-peer (P2P) systems have evolved rapidly and become immensely popular in Internet. Users in P2P systems can share resources with each other and in this way the server loading is reduced. P2P systems' good performance and scalability attract a lot of interest in the research community as well as in industry. Yet, P2P systems are very complicated systems. Building a P2P system requires carefully and repeatedly thinking and ex- amining architectural design issues. Instead of setting foot in all aspects of designing a P2P system, this thesis focuses on two things: analyzing reliability and performance of different tracker designs and studying a large-scale P2P file sharing system, Xun- lei. The "tracker" of a P2P system is used to lookup which peers hold (or partially hold) a given object. There are various designs for the tracker function, from a single-server tracker, to DHT- based (distributed hash table) serverless systems. In the first part of this thesis, we classify the different tracker designs, dis- cuss the different considerations for these designs, and provide simple models to evaluate the reliability of these designs. Xunlei is a new proprietary P2P file sharing protocol that has become very popular in China.
    [Show full text]
  • Defense Against the Dark Arts of Copyright Trolling Matthew As G
    Loyola University Chicago, School of Law LAW eCommons Faculty Publications & Other Works 2018 Defense Against the Dark Arts of Copyright Trolling Matthew aS g Jake Haskell Follow this and additional works at: https://lawecommons.luc.edu/facpubs Part of the Civil Procedure Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Defense Against the Dark Arts of Copyright Trolling Matthew Sag &Jake Haskell * ABSTRACT: In this Article, we offer both a legal and a pragmaticframework for defending against copyright trolls. Lawsuits alleging online copyright infringement by John Doe defendants have accounted for roughly half of all copyright casesfiled in the United States over the past threeyears. In the typical case, the plaintiffs claims of infringement rely on a poorly substantiatedform pleading and are targeted indiscriminately at noninfringers as well as infringers. This practice is a subset of the broaderproblem of opportunistic litigation, but it persists due to certain unique features of copyright law and the technical complexity of Internet technology. The plaintiffs bringing these cases target hundreds or thousands of defendants nationwide and seek quick settlements pricedjust low enough that it is less expensive for the defendant to pay rather than to defend the claim, regardless of the claim's merits. We report new empirical data on the continued growth of this form of copyright trolling in the United States. We also undertake a detailed analysis of the legal andfactual underpinnings of these cases. Despite theirunderlying weakness, plaintiffs have exploited information asymmetries, the high cost of federal court litigation, and the extravagant threat of statutory damages for copyright infringement to leverage settlementsfrom the guilty and the innocent alike.
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions
    Copyright & File-Sharing FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS WHAT IS COPYRIGHT? BUT I BOUGHT IT. WHY CAN’T I SHARE IT? WHAT CAN I DO TO AVOID COPYRIGHT Copyright refers to the legal rights creators have There is a difference between using and distributing INFRINGEMENT? over the use, distribution, and reproduction of copyrighted materials. Purchasing songs, movies, or Download content from legitimate sources and do original work (music, movies, software, etc.). software from legitimate sources does not give you the not share copyrighted materials online. Uninstall Copyright infringement is the unlawful use of any right to share these materials over the Internet or make P2P applications (e.g., Popcorn Time, BitTorrent, material protected under copyright law. Common copies for others. When you purchase a Peer-to-Peer Vuze), which may be sharing your files without violations include downloading ‘pirated’ copies of (P2P) program (e.g., Frostwire, BitTorrent, Vuze), you your knowledge. Do not share your NetID and copyrighted materials or sharing files not intended only buy the software, not any files you download or password with anyone. Keep your computer for you to distribute. share using this software. up-to-date with the latest security patches and anti-virus software. HOW DO I KNOW IT’S COPYRIGHTED? DOES UMASS IT MONITOR MY INTERNET Assume all materials are copyright-protected CONNECTION? HOW CAN I LEGALLY DOWNLOAD CONTENT? unless you created them or you have received the No. We do not monitor the contents of your computer Services like Amazon, iTunes, and eMusic offer author’s explicit permission to distribute them. All or issue copyright complaints.
    [Show full text]
  • Bittorrent, Inc., ) DOCKET NO
    142 3020 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS: Edith Ramirez, Chairwoman Julie Brill Maureen K. Ohlhausen Joshua D. Wright Terrell McSweeny ____________________________________ ) In the Matter of ) ) BitTorrent, Inc., ) DOCKET NO. C-4464 a corporation. ) ) ___________________________________ ) COMPLAINT The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that the BitTorrent, Inc., a corporation, has violated the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”), and it appearing to the Commission that this proceeding is in the public interest, alleges: 1. Respondent BitTorrent, Inc. (“BitTorrent”) is a California corporation, with its principal office or place of business at 303 2nd Street, Suite S600, San Francisco, CA 94107. 2. Respondent is the developer of a popular peer-to-peer file-sharing system used to exchange software, music, movies, digital books, and other large files online. 3. The acts and practices of respondent as alleged in this complaint have been in or affecting commerce, as “commerce” is defined in Section 4 of the FTC Act. 4. Respondent has set forth on its website, www.bittorrent.com, privacy policies and statements about its practices, including statements related to its participation in the Safe Harbor privacy framework agreed upon by the U.S. and the European Union (“U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Framework”). The Framework 5. The U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Framework provides a method for U.S. companies to transfer personal data outside of Europe that is consistent with the requirements of the European Union Directive on Data Protection (“Directive”). Enacted in 1995, the Directive sets forth European Union (“EU”) requirements for privacy and the protection of personal data.
    [Show full text]
  • Deluge-2.0.3
    deluge Documentation Release 2.0.3 Deluge Team June 12, 2019 CONTENTS 1 Contents 1 1.1 Getting started with Deluge.......................................1 1.2 How-to guides..............................................2 1.3 Release notes...............................................3 1.4 Development & community.......................................6 1.5 Development guide............................................ 11 1.6 Reference................................................. 21 i ii CHAPTER ONE CONTENTS 1.1 Getting started with Deluge This is a starting point if you are new to Deluge where we will walk you through getting up and running with our BitTorrent client. 1.1.1 Installing Deluge These are the instructions for installing Deluge. Consider them a work-in-progress and feel free to make suggestions for improvement. Ubuntu PPA Until the stable PPA is updated, the development version of Deluge can be used: sudo add-apt-repository-u ppa:deluge-team/stable sudo apt install deluge PyPi To install from Python PyPi, Deluge requires the following system installed packages: sudo apt install python3-pip python3-libtorrent python3-gi python3-gi-cairo gir1.2- ,!gtk-3.0 gir1.2-appindicator3 Install with pip: pip install deluge Windows Unfortuately due to move to GTK3 and Python 3 there is no installer package currently available for Windows. Intrepid users can install Deluge from seperate packages as detailed in issue #3201. 1 deluge Documentation, Release 2.0.3 macOS There is no .app package currently for macOS, but can try Deluge with homebrew. 1. Install Homebrew 2. Open a terminal. 3. Run the following to install required packages: brew install pygobject3 gtk+3 adwaita-icon-theme brew install libtorrent-rasterbar 4. To fix translations: brew link gettext--force 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Justin Sun Chief Executive Officer Bittorrent, Inc. 301 Howard Street #2000 San Francisco, CA 94105
    Justin Sun Chief Executive Officer BitTorrent, Inc. 301 Howard Street #2000 San Francisco, CA 94105 Charles Wayn Chief Executive Officer DLive 19450 Stevens Creek Blvd #100 Cupertino, CA 95014 February 9, 2021 Dear Mr. Sun and Mr. Wayn, We write to you expressing concern about recent user activity in DLive communities attempting to attract American citizens, and particularly adolescent users, to white supremacy and domestic extremism. We noted the company’s internal governance actions taken on January 17th, 2021, in the wake of the riots at the U.S. Capitol Building on January 6th, 20211; however, it is evident that oversight from outside of the company’s internal review body may be necessary. According to media reports, DLive CEO Charles Wayn stated last year in a set of emails that the company strategy to combat extreme right-wing content was to “tolerate” them and allow other more popular content producers to “dilute” their reach.2 If true, this is unacceptable. During the January 6th, 2021, storming of the United States Capitol, your platform live streamed a number of individuals who entered and were around the building. Several of these individuals earned thousands of dollars in DLive’s digital currency that day, and a number received large donations through the platform ahead of the event. One individual received $2,800 in a live stream on January 5th, 2021, in which he encouraged his viewers to murder elected officials.3 We understand that DLive has supposedly removed 1 Wayn, Charles. “An Open Letter to the DLive Community.” DLive Community Announcements, (January 17th, 2021).
    [Show full text]
  • Analys Av Popcorn Time Med Hjälp Av Sniffingprogrammet Wireshark
    Analys av Popcorn Time med hjalp¨ av sniffingprogrammet Wireshark Kevin A.˚ Kimaryo Fredrik Siemund Lund University Lund University [email protected] [email protected] Sammanfattning—Vi har anvant¨ sniffingprogrammet ocksa˚ sa˚ det funkar, men ar¨ det en stor fil som laddas upp Wireshark for¨ att analysera vad som hander¨ nar¨ man streamar i omraden˚ med laga˚ overf¨ oringshastigheter¨ kan det innebara¨ (svenska: strommar)¨ film med den olagliga tjansten¨ Popcorn stora belastningar pa˚ internettrafiken och andra anvandare¨ i Time. Popcorn Time ar¨ en BitTorrent-klient vilket betyder att anvandarna¨ bade˚ laddar upp och ner data vid tittandet av en omradet˚ kan uppleva storningar.¨ Dessutom kan det vara valdigt¨ film. Popcorn Time hittar andra anvandare¨ genom att ta kontakt dyrt att tillgodose den nodv¨ andiga¨ uppladdningshastigheten for¨ med en server som i BitTorrent-protokollet kallas for¨ "tracker", att kunna distribuera stora filer pa˚ ett snabbt och smidigt satt.¨ vilket ar¨ det enda centrala elementet i Popcorn Time och som Istallet¨ for¨ att ha en enda nedladdningskalla¨ sa˚ kan haller˚ reda pa˚ vart andra anvandare¨ finns. Vart˚ resultat visar man utnyttja de anvandare¨ som laddar ner filen; man later˚ att Popcorn Time i princip beter sig som en vanlig BitTorrent- klient med den enda skillnad att tjansten¨ dessutom anvander¨ ett dem inte bara ladda ner utan aven¨ ladda upp delar av filen protokoll for¨ streaming av video, kallat GVSP. till andra anvandare.¨ Detta ar¨ tanken bakom BitTorrent och innebar¨ att anvandarnas¨ (det vill saga¨ de som laddar ner en I. INLEDNING fil) uppladningskapacitet utnyttjas och pa˚ sa˚ satt¨ skickas och Att streama innehall˚ over¨ natet¨ blir allt vanligare.
    [Show full text]
  • Bittorrent Is an Auction: Analyzing and Improving Bittorrent’S Incentives
    BitTorrent is an Auction: Analyzing and Improving BitTorrent’s Incentives Dave Levin Katrina LaCurts Neil Spring Bobby Bhattacharjee University of Maryland University of Maryland University of Maryland University of Maryland [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION Incentives play a crucial role in BitTorrent, motivating users to up- BitTorrent [2] is a remarkably successful decentralized system load to others to achieve fast download times for all peers. Though that allows many users to download a file from an otherwise under- long believed to be robust to strategic manipulation, recent work provisioned server. To ensure quick download times and scalabil- has empirically shown that BitTorrent does not provide its users ity, BitTorrent relies upon those downloading a file to cooperatively incentive to follow the protocol. We propose an auction-based trade portions, or pieces, of the file with one another [5]. Incentives model to study and improve upon BitTorrent’s incentives. The play an inherently crucial role in such a system; users generally insight behind our model is that BitTorrent uses, not tit-for-tat as wish to download their files as quickly as possible, and since Bit- widely believed, but an auction to decide which peers to serve. Our Torrent is decentralized, there is no global “BitTorrent police” to model not only captures known, performance-improving strategies, govern their actions. Users are therefore free to attempt to strate- it shapes our thinking toward new, effective strategies. For exam- gically manipulate others into helping them download faster. The ple, our analysis demonstrates, counter-intuitively, that BitTorrent role of incentives in BitTorrent is to motivate users to contribute peers have incentive to intelligently under-report what pieces of their resources to others so as to achieve desirable global system the file they have to their neighbors.
    [Show full text]
  • 38 Bittorrent Software and Usage Justin Mckinney
    ARTICLE BITTORRENT SOFTwaRE AND USAGE Justin McKinney Mark Simon Haydn 1. Abstract: While the circulation of cultural material outside of official channels is not new, the scale and infrastructure afforded by digital networks and peer-to-peer protocols has drastically changed its dynamics. Focusing on private trackers and online, members-only communities dedicated to sharing difficult to find and “gray-area” cinema content, our paper discusses new digital re- positories and their connection to the traditional film archive. With discussion of the types of materials held, user participation, and custodial efforts to restore or improve cultural material, we will discuss the activities of a contemporary private tracker community. Additionally, the paper will interrogate the legality and copyright issues surrounding these activities and ex- plore recent, licit adoption of the infrastructure that has been developed for online circulation. Discussion will conclude with attention to cases in which pirated material has resurfaced in a rights-holding context, and an assessment of what these developments mean for custodians of film material working in a traditional film archive context. As a combination of discussion, case study, and argument, the paper will serve as a topical primer on a pressing and under- researched area of interest in this field, building on a panel presented at last year’s Association of Moving Image Archivists conference in Georgia. 2. BitTorrent Software and Usage BitTorrent is a software protocol developed in 2001 and designed to aid the practice of peer- to-peer file sharing on the Internet. The primary advantage of BitTorrent is that it allows for segmented downloading, which is the coordinated transmission of a file sourced from multiple servers to a single destination.81 This protocol allows for the rapid sharing of large amounts of data by allowing a user to download a file from multiple sources that are uploading the file at the same time.82 This allows for more efficient and faster downloading than the traditional client-server model.
    [Show full text]