2-5 Antenna Calibration 2-5-1 Calibration of Loop Antennas for EMI Measurements in the Frequency Range Below 30 Mhz

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2-5 Antenna Calibration 2-5-1 Calibration of Loop Antennas for EMI Measurements in the Frequency Range Below 30 Mhz Title:J2016E-02-05-01.indd p71 2017/03/01/ 水 10:26:55 2 Research and Development of Calibration Technology 2-5 Antenna Calibration 2-5-1 Calibration of Loop Antennas for EMI Measurements in the Frequency Range Below 30 MHz Katsumi FUJII, Kojiro SAKAI, Tsutomu SUGIYAMA, Kouichi SEBATA, and Iwao NISHIYAMA This paper describes the calibration method of loop antennas for EMI measurements in the frequency range below 30 MHz. NICT developed the method by ourselves and started to provide the calibration service that is certified by ASNITE accreditation program. Because the ASNITE is compliant with the international standard ISO/IEC 17025, the loop antennas calibrated by NICT can be used for all tests such as validations of radio equipment and EMI measurements of electronic devices. 1 Introduction from a transmitting loop antenna that interlinks with an antenna under calibration (receiving antenna). The strength New ways of using 30 MHz and lower radio frequencies of the magnetic field emitted from a transmitting antenna have appeared in recent years: IH induction rice cookers, is determined by correctly measuring the RF current flow- contactless chargers, contactless IC cards, etc., that differ ing through the element of the transmitting antenna. The from conventional radio broadcasts and commercial wire- RF current flowing through the element is measured by less communications. Both new and conventional uses using the conversion component attached to the element, share the same frequency band, so actually one must and converting the RF current flowing through the element measure the electromagnetic fields, and check that there is into DC voltage. A resistor that converts RF current into no interference. Also, electric and electronic devices such heat, or a thermocouple in a vacuum tube that uses heat as AC power supply adapters and LED lights that contain to generate DC voltage, are used for conversion compo- switching regulators are often used in our daily lives, so nents. In this case, correctness and traceability to national there are increasing needs to take measurements to regulate standards of the strength of the magnetic field emitted from unintentionally emitted electromagnetic noise. In this en- the transmitting loop antenna can be maintained by cor- vironment, NICT obtained ASNITE certification to fulfill rectly calibrating the conversion coefficient of the conversion the ISO/IEC 17025 standard for loop antenna calibration, component. However, there were limits to improving its and began providing calibration services in July 2015. precision, partly because this calibration is complex [2][3]. NICT developed a system that can issue internationally To solve this problem, NICT developed a new calibra- recognized calibration certificates which can be used for all measurements, without distinguishing between use for wireless communications or for electromagnetic noise Plane wave Loop antenna measurements. E FaH Electromagnetic field measurements of 30 MHz or lower have conventionally used loop antennas that have sufficiently smaller dimensions than the wavelengths. NICT H Receiver has provided calibration services and performed research and development on calibration of loop antennas since the V time of its Radio Research Laboratory [1]. The “standard magnetic field method” is used to calibrate loop antennas; this method theoretically obtains a magnetic field emitted FFig. 1 Magnetic field measurement and definition of magnetic field antenna factor 71 Title:J2016E-02-05-01.indd p72 2017/03/01/ 水 10:26:55 2 Research and Development of Calibration Technology tion method in recent years [4][5], and started providing 3 Calibration method calibration services. This method is classified the same as a conventional “standard magnetic field method”, but in- Several methods of calibrating loop antennas have al- stead of conventional calibration methods that calibrate ready been proposed [6]–[8]. Some of these methods have from different physical quantities, this method uses an been made international standards by the International already calibrated loop antenna to calibrate another loop Special Committee of Radio Interference (CISPR) [8]. antenna. The advantages of this calibration method are that There are also several classification methods; Table 1 clas- it measures RF power instead of RF current, and that it sifies them into absolute calibration methods which obtain uses a loop antenna to obtain traceability to the national the loop antenna’s magnetic field antenna factor from standard. This paper shows the result of calibrating an other physical amounts (RF current or RF power), and actual commercially sold loop antenna, and explains a relative calibration methods that use a loop antenna with method to evaluate uncertainty associated with the calibra- an already known magnetic field antenna factor to obtain tion result. the magnetic field antenna factor of the antenna under calibration (hereinafter written as “AUC”). Table 1 writes 2 Definition of magnetic field antenna the types of devices needed for calibration, number of factor and how to use it times to measure, features, etc. This calibration method developed at NICT [4][5] is A loop antenna operates by electricity generated by a classified as a “relative calibration” method. It requires a magnetic field that interlinks with the loop plane. Therefore, loop antenna with an already known magnetic field an- as shown in Fig. 1, the loop antenna’s characteristic is de- tenna factor, but this calibration method has the advan- fined by using the ratio of strength H of the magnetic field tages that it can ensure direct traceability to the national that interlinks with the loop plane, and voltage V gener- standard, and that it only needs one measurement. ated in the receiver connected to the loop antenna. Requiring few measurements is an essential condition for H reducing uncertainty of calibration. FaH [S/m] (1) V Here, we consider using a “loop antenna with already This FaH is called the “magnetic field antenna factor”. known magnetic field antenna factor” (hereinafter, “Standard”) as the transmitting antenna. The magnetic field antenna fac- Usually, it is expressed using dB. tor, as defined in Equation (1), is a parameter that expresses dB characteristics of the receiving antenna. If an antenna has FaH log20 FaH10 [dB(S/m)] (2) reciprocity, then it can be used as the transmitting antenna. The unit is dB(S/m). By calibrating the loop antenna, if the As shown in Fig. 2, a circular loop antenna with radius magnetic field antenna factor was already obtained, then size rRx for which we want to obtain the magnetic field one can read the output voltage V of the receiver, and use antenna factor (AUC) is placed at distance d from the the following equation to know the strength of the mag- Standard (radius rTx), with its loop plane parallel to the netic field that interlinks with the antenna. Standard, with their centers aligned. Then, if we use a dB dB dB vector network analyzer (hereinafter, “VNA”) to measure H A/m)][dB( V V)][dB( FaH [dB(S/m)] S21 between the Standard and AUC, the magnetic field (3) antenna factor of the AUC can be determined from the If the transmitting source is sufficiently far, and plane waves following equation. are being received, then in addition to wave impedance in 2K 1 F (AUC) (5) aH )( SSTDFZ free space (0 0.377120 ) , one can use aH00 21 dB dB dB Here, E V/m)][dB( V V)][dB( FaH [dB(S/m)] 51.53 )][dB( FaH (STD) :Magnetic field antenna factor of Standard (4) [S/m] and convert into electric field strength. :Angular frequency (2πf [rad/s]) -7 ( 53.510.377log20 ) 0 : 10 Permeability of vacuum (4π × 10 H/m) Z 0 :Characteristic impedance of measurement system (50 Ω) 72 Journal of the National Institute of Information and Communications Technology Vol. 63 No. 1 (2016) Title:J2016E-02-05-01.indd p73 2017/03/01/ 水 10:26:55 Calibr ation of L oop A nteenns for EMI Measurements in the F requency R ange B elow 30 MHz 2-5-1  Also, On the other hand, as shown in Fig. 3 (b), the Standard 2 2 4 at NICT is a shielded loop antenna with ϕSTD=3.7 mm and 1 R 15 r r 315 r r 0 Tx Rx Tx Rx K 3 1 2 2 (6) radius rRx= 5.0 cm (REPIC, M201A-100R). It is calibrated 2R0 8 R0 64 R0 at the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) which maintains 2 2f the UK’s national standards. Figure 4 shows the traceabil- (λ is wavelength, c is speed of light) c ity chart. 2 2 2 Table 2 shows the calibration points where NICT pro- R0 d rTx rRx vides calibration values. NPL does not provide all the d Distance between planes of Standard and AUC [m] calibration points that NICT provides, so we use the inter- rTx Loop radius of Standard [m] polated values of NPL’s calibration certificate. When inter- rRx Loop radius of AUC [m] polating, two regression curves are prepared with an 8 MHz frequency boundary, and used as the calibration Refer to [9]. If dB is used to calculate, then it is values. The next chapter describes the size of uncertainty dB dB dB due to interpolation. FaH AUC 45.9 20log10 fMHz S 21 20log10 K FaH STD As shown in Fig. 2, measurements used a VNA (Rohde [dB(S/m)] (7) & Schwarz ZNB4) near the center in a semi-anechoic (See its derivation in the Appendix). chamber, with antennas placed with distance between an- tennas d = 20 cm, height from ground plane until loop 4 Calibration results element’s center h = 1.6 m, and S21 was measured. The VNA was calibrated by a procedure called “Unknown Thru” This paper shows results of calibrating the loop an- before measurement. tenna for EMI measurements shown in Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Antenna Gain Measurement Using Image Theory
    i ANTENNA GAIN MEASUREMENT USING IMAGE THEORY SANDRAWARMAN A/L BALASUNDRAM A project report submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of the degree Master of Electrical Engineering Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia JANUARY 2014 v ABSTRACT This report presents the measurement result of a passive horn antenna gain by only using metallic reflector and vector network analyzer, according to image theory. This method is an alternative way to conventional methods such as the three antennas method and the two antennas method. The gain values are calculated using a simple formula using the distance between the antenna and reflector, operating frequency, S- parameter and speed of light. The antenna is directed towards an absorber and then directed towards the reflector to obtain the S11 parameter using the vector network analyzer. The experiments are performed in three locations which are in the shielding room, anechoic chamber and open space with distances of 0.5m, 1m, 2m, 3m and 4m. The results calculated are compared and analyzed with the manufacture’s data. The calculated data have the best similarities with the manufacturer data at distance of 0.5m for the anechoic chamber with correlation coefficient of 0.93 and at a distance of 1m for the shield room and open space with correlation coefficient of 0.79 and 0.77 but distort at distances of 2m, 3m and 4m at all of the three places. This proves that the single antenna method using image theory needs less space, time and cost to perform it.
    [Show full text]
  • Price List/Order Terms
    PRICE LIST/ORDER TERMS 575 SE ASHLEY PLACE • GRANTS PASS, OR 97526 PHONE: (800) 736-6677 • FAX: (541) 471-6251 WIRELESS MADE SIMPLE www.linxtechnologies.com RF MODULES Prices Effective 02/04/04 Linx RF modules make it easy and cost-effective to add wireless capabilities to any product. That’s because Linx modules contain all the components necessary for the transmission of RF. Since no external components (except an antenna) are needed, the modules are easily applied, even by persons lacking previous RF design experience. This conserves valuable engineering resources and greatly reduces the product's time to market. Once in production, Linx RF modules improve yields, reduce placement costs, and eliminate the need for testing or adjustment. LC Series - Low-Cost Ultra-Compact RF Data Module The LC Series is ideally suited for volume use in OEM applications, such as remote control, security, identification, and periodic data transfer. Packaged in a compact SMD package, the LC modules utilize a highly optimized SAW architecture to achieve an unmatched blend of performance, size, efficiency and cost. Quantity TX RX-P* RX-S • Complete RF TX/RX solution <200 $5.60 $11.80 $10.90 • Ultra-compact size • Low cost in volume 200-999 $4.90 $10.65 $9.85 • High-performance SAW 1,000-4,999 $4.38 $9.50 $8.90 architecture >5000 Call Call Call • Direct serial interface • Low power consumption Part #’s Description • 5kbps maximum data rate TXM-***-LC LC Series Transmitter • >300ft. range RXM-***-LC-P LC Series Receiver Pinned SMD • No production tuning RXM-***-LC-S LC Series Receiver Compact SMD • No external components =315, 418, 433MHz 418MHz Standard RX-S *** required (except antenna) * = -P version not recommended for new designs • Wide temperature range RX-P LR Series - Long Range, Low Cost RF Data Module NEW The LR Series provides a 5-10 times range improvement over previous discrete and modular solutions and establishes a new benchmark for range performance and cost effectiveness within our product line.
    [Show full text]
  • An Improved Method to Determine the Antenna Factor Wout Joseph and Luc Martens, Member, IEEE
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Ghent University Academic Bibliography 252 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, VOL. 54, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 2005 An Improved Method to Determine the Antenna Factor Wout Joseph and Luc Martens, Member, IEEE Abstract—In this paper, we present an improved method to de- [5] and [6]. These methods make use of tabulated values of termine the antenna factor of three antennas. Instead of using a the maximum field strength for frequencies below 1000 MHz. reflecting ground plane we use absorbers. Destructive interference An advantage of our method is that it is applicable for both E- between the direct beam and the residual reflected beam from the absorbers is avoided by splitting the measured frequency range and H-field probes. For the calibration of loop antennas, two in bands and changing the distance between the two antennas de- methods are described in [7]. The first method is based on cal- pending on the frequency band. Furthermore, this method is ap- culation of the loop impedances. The second method is by gen- plicable for both E- and H-field probes. Our method has also the erating a well-defined standard magnetic field. The first method advantage of being low-cost: The method does not need to be per- cannot be used because the geometric shape of the split-shield formed in an anechoic chamber to obtain high accuracy. To take the residual reflections of the environment into account, we perform a loop probes is not simple.
    [Show full text]
  • C-Band TWG-1 Best Practices Annexes
    ANNEX D Approved June 4, 2020 Terrestrial-Satellite Coexistence During and After the C-Band Transition Technical Work Group #1 Scope of Work 1. Preventing Interference 1.1. Emphasize the need for the FCC to complete its review of the pending C-Band incumbent earth station registration and modification applications in IBFS. 1.2. Agree on relevant data necessary for protection of Earth stations. (All 3.7 GHz Service licensees need to work from a common list of Earth stations.) 1.3. Understand best practices that 3.7 GHz Service licensees use to predict whether the FCC- specified power flux density (PFD) limits will be exceeded at earth station locations. 1.4. Agree on a common method for converting between PFD and power spectral density (PSD) at the Earth station. 1.5. Understand the nature of the Earth station receive filters to ensure that they will be adequate to reject 3.7 GHz Service signals below 3.98 GHz over a range of environmental conditions in order to ensure that the FCC-specified blocking PFD limit is met. 2. Interference Detection 2.1. Develop a procedure for earth stations to positively identify or exclude sources of interference. This procedure should rapidly eliminate non-3.7 GHz Service causes and initiate the inter-service interference resolution process. Consider whether a detection and alerting mechanism could be automated, particularly for major Earth station facilities. 2.2. Develop estimates of distances between 3.7 GHz facilities and earth stations beyond which interference is unlikely. 2.3. Develop a process for positively identifying or excluding sources of 3.7 GHz interference.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Antenna in DS-CDMA Mobile Communication System Using Circular Array Technique
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2003-03 Smart antenna in DS-CDMA mobile communication system using circular array technique Ng, Stewart Siew Loon Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California THESIS SMART ANTENNA IN DS-CDMA MOBILE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM USING CIRCULAR ARRAY TECHNIQUE by Stewart Siew Loon Ng March 2003 Thesis Advisor: Tri Ha Co-Advisor: Jovan Lebaric Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED March 2003 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE: 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Smart Antenna in DS-CDMA Mobile Communication System using Circular Array 6. AUTHOR(S) Stewart Siew Loon Ng 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION REPORT Monterey, CA 93943-5000 NUMBER 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Sound Card Internal Noise 20061128054754 0.0125
    FSM Table of Contents Overview ..................................................................................................................................................2 Configuration............................................................................................................................................3 Hardware ..............................................................................................................................................3 Software................................................................................................................................................4 FSM..................................................................................................................................................4 DPLOT .............................................................................................................................................4 Visual Basic......................................................................................................................................5 Calibration................................................................................................................................................5 Attenuator.............................................................................................................................................5 Receiver Noise Figure ..........................................................................................................................6 FSM Receiver Noise
    [Show full text]
  • Antenna Basics
    ANTENNA BASICS Christof Rohner Antenna Basics 2 C O N T E N T S 1 Introduction 3 2 Antenna Characteristics 4 2.1 Radiation Pattern 4 2.2 Directivity Factor 5 2.3 Gain 5 2.4 Effective Area 6 2.5 Effective Antenna Length 7 2.6 Antenna Factor 8 2.7 Impedances and Resistances 10 3 Basic Characteristics of Selected Antennas 12 3.1 Dipole Antennas 12 3.2 Rod Antennas 16 3.3 Directional Antennas 18 3.4 Active Antennas 23 4 Most Important Antenna Characteristics at a Glance 26 5 Used and Recommended References 27 Basics_e.doc Ro November 1999 Antenna Basics 3 1 Introduction Antennas are used for converting conducted electromagnetic waves into electromagnetic waves freely propagating in space and vice versa (Fig. 1.1). The name is derived from the field of zoology, where the term antennae (Latin) is used to designate the long thin feelers of insects. The oldest existing antennas, eg those used by Heinrich Hertz in 1888 in his first experiments for proving the existence of electromagnetic waves, were neither physically nor functionally separated from high-frequency generators, and up to the present day resonant circuits are taken as models for illustrating certain antenna characteristics. It was not until around and after 1900 that antennas were clearly separated and regarded an independent unit in a radio system as transmitting and receiving stations were set up. Modern antennas often do not differ much from their ancestors in their outward appearance but are usually of highly elaborate design tailored to match the application on hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Nist Calibration Procedure for Vertically Polarized Monopole Antennas, 30 Khz to 300 Mhz
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS Nisr AND TECHNOLOGY NATL INST OF ST4N0 » TECH R.I C A111D3 MT7flflE NIST NIST Technical Note 1347 PUBLICATIONS OCfOO NIST Calibration Procedure di for Vertically Polarized Monopole Antennas, 30 kHz to 300 MHz D. G. Camel! E. B. Larsen J. E. Cruz D. A. Hill Electromagnetic Fields Division Center for Electronics and Electrical Engineering National Engineering Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Boulder, Colorado 80303-3328 \ kV^ U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Robert A. Mosbacher, Secretary NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY, John W. Lyons, Director Issued January 1991 National Institute of Standards and Technology Technical Note 1347 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol., Tech. Note 1347, 28 pages (January 1991) CODEN:NTNOEF U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1991 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 . CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 1 . INTRODUCTION 1 2 . THEORETICAL BASIS 2 3. STANDARD FIELD METHOD FOR CALIBRATING MONOPOLES 4 3 . 1 Description of the Equipment 4 3 . 2 Test Procedure 5 3 . 3 Antenna Factor 6 3 . 4 Calibration Uncertainty 7 4 CONCLUSIONS 8 5 . REFERENCES 8 APPENDIX A: SAMPLE TEST REPORT FOR A VERTICAL MONOPOLE 10 iii . NIST CALIBRATION PROCEDURE FOR VERTICALLY POLARIZED MONOPOLE ANTENNAS, 30 KHZ TO 300 MHZ D.G. Camell, E.B. Larsen, J.E. Cruz, and D.A. Hill Electromagnetic Fields Division National Institute of Standards and Technology Boulder, CO 80303 This report describes the theoretical basis and test procedure for vertically polarized monopole antenna calibrations at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) .
    [Show full text]
  • Lab7 Antenna Demo1.Pdf
    Name:___________________________________ CM#___________ Part I: Antennas 1. Introduction 1 (a) Near field vs. far field • λ, f, and vp are related by λf = v p , in a vacuum or in air. 3×108 m / s 300m / μs • λ = = Note vp = 300 m/μs = 11811”/μs. f in Hz f in MHz 2D2 • Far Field Distance > Whichever is larger: 3λ or , where D is the largest dimension of the λ antenna 1 (b) Circuit quantities: radiation resistance, radiated power 1 (c) Space quantities: radiated field pattern, radiated power pattern E 1 (d) Antenna factor inc Vrec Example: at 80 MHz, we see that AFdB = 9 dB. Therefore, EdBuV = AFdB + CLdB + VAdBuV. Assuming 30 ft of coaxial cable, with 4.5 dB/100 ft loss, we have EdBuV/m = 9 dB + 4.5/3 dB + VAdBuV Note: You may calibrate the Agilent E4402B Spectrum analyzer to display the spectrum in units of dBuV by pressing AMPLITUDE, More, Y Axis Units, dBuV 2 Dipoles and Monopoles 2 (a) A dipole antenna We shall use a standard 30 MHz – 300 MHz biconical broadband receiving antenna. The axis of our biconical antenna will be oriented horizontally, so it responds best to horizontal E field. (See the biconical antenna radiation patterns included in Part 6.) Lab #6 Antennas and Conducted Emission ECE342 Page 1 of 13 Configuration Length Electrical Voltage at Maximum E Frequency Length (in Spectrum field (dBμV/m) (MHz) (m) wavelengths) Analyzer (dBμV) Shortest and 80 horizontal Shortest and 80 vertical Open, mid-length 80 and horizontal Open, mid-length 80 and vertical Open, longest and 80 horizontal Open, longest and 80 vertical 2 (b) A monopole Configuration Length (m) Electrical Voltage at Maximum E Frequency length Spectrum field (MHz) Analyzer (dBμV/m) (dBμV) End Fire 80 Broadside 80 Horizontal Broadside 80 Vertical 2 (c) Twin lead (open-circuit terminated) Configuration Length Electrical Voltage at Maximum E field Frequency (m) Length Spectrum (dBμV/m) (MHz) Analyzer (dBμV) End Fire 80 Broadside 80 Lab #6 Antennas and Conducted Emission ECE342 Page 2 of 13 Vertical Broadside 80 Horizontal 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Antenna Factor for EMC Measurements
    Com-Power Corporation (714) 528-8800 http://www.com-power.com Use of Antenna Factors in EMI Measurements AN-106 AF There are various technical parameters associated with antennas which are commonly studied and defined; including gain, directivity, beamwidth (or beam area), aperture, antenna pattern, antenna temperature, and antenna radiation resistance. The antenna factor is rarely included as one of the basic parameters of an antenna, as it is used almost exclusively in EMI testing when making radiated electric field strength (E-field) measurements. E-field measurements are necessary for determining compliance with most electromagnetic interference requirements/standards, such as FCC Part 15, CISPR 22, EN 55022, etc. Many engineers starting new in the EMC field may find the concept of antenna factor and its explanation useful. This application note defines the antenna factor and explains how this concept simplifies the measurement of E-field using an EMC antenna. Also included in this discussion are the basic parameters of other measurement system components typically used along with the antenna for making E-field measurements. Finally, some practical limitations of this concept are discussed along with precautions to be taken. Antenna Factor Definition: Antenna factor is defined as the ratio of the electromagnetic field incident on the antenna to the voltage output at its output terminal (connector). This is a linear definition expressed in volts per meter (V/m). So, in linear terms, the field strength is equal to the voltage output multiplied by the antenna factor. In practice, a logarithmic expression for the ratio is much simpler to apply, and is more commonly used.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ANTENNA FACTOR by RON HRANAC
    Originally appeared in the July 2012 issue of Communications Technology. THE ANTENNA FACTOR By RON HRANAC In the world of electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) and electromagnetic interference (EMI) testing, a parameter known as "antenna factor" commonly is used. Antenna factor is not widely known in the cable industry, although it is built in to the calculations used for signal leakage measurements as the “0.021” and “f” (frequency) in the microvolts per meter-to-dBmV conversion formula. ( For more on the mathematics of field- strength measurements, see my June 2008 column at www.cable360.net/ct/operations/bestpractices/30008.html). Wikipedia defines antenna factor as “the ratio of the incident electromagnetic field strength to the voltage V (units: V or µV) on the line connection of an antenna. For an electric field antenna, field strength is in units of V/m or µV/m, and the resulting antenna factor AF is in units of 1/m: AF = E/V. “The antenna factor for a given antenna is related closely to the load impedance Z0 connected to the antenna’s terminals.” In other words, antenna factor is the ratio of the field strength of an electromagnetic field incident upon an antenna to the voltage produced by that field across a load of impedance Z0 connected to an antenna’s terminals. (Subsequent references to “antenna terminals” in this article assume those terminals are connected to a suitable load of the desired impedance Z 0). The field strength can be calculated by multiplying the voltage at the antenna’s terminals by the antenna factor.
    [Show full text]
  • 6500 Series Loop Antennas 399293 B
    6500 Series Loop Antennas User Manual ETS-Lindgren Inc. reserves the right to make changes to any product described herein in order to improve function, design, or for any other reason. Nothing contained herein shall constitute ETS-Lindgren Inc. assuming any liability whatsoever arising out of the application or use of any product or circuit described herein. ETS-Lindgren Inc. does not convey any license under its patent rights or the rights of others. © Copyright 2020 by ETS-Lindgren Inc. All Rights Reserved. No part of this document may be copied by any means without written permission from ETS-Lindgren Inc. Trademarks used in this document: The ETS-Lindgren logo is a trademark of ETS-Lindgren Inc. Revision Record MANUAL,6500 SERIES LOOP ANTENNAS | Part #399293, Rev. B Revision Description Date A Initial Release November, 2013 B Revised Release August, 2020 ii www.ets-lindgren.com Table of Contents Notes, Cautions, and Warnings ................................................ v 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................... 7 Model 6502 .................................................................................................... 8 Model 6507 .................................................................................................... 8 Model 6509 .................................................................................................... 9 Models 6511 and 6512 .................................................................................. 9 Standard Configuration
    [Show full text]