DOCSLIB.ORG

Antenna Factor for Loop Antennas”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Antenna Factor for Loop Antennas” Final report EURAMET Supplementary Comparison EURAMET.EM.RF-S27 “Antenna factor for Loop Antennas” Frédéric Pythoud(1), Michele Borsero(2), Daniel Bownds(3), Soydan ÇAKIR(4), Mustafa ÇETİNTAŞ(4), Karel Dražil(5), David Gentle(3), Domenico Giordano(2), Stuart Harmon(3), Josef Kupec(5), Yannick Le Sage(6), Beat Mühlemann(1), Michal Ulvr(5), Giuseppe Vizio(2), Dongsheng Zhao(7) Mai 2014 1Federal Institute of Metrology METAS, Lindenweg 50, 3003 Bern-Wabern, Switzerland, [email protected] 2Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (INRIM), Italy 3National Physical Laboratory (NPL), United Kingdom 4TÜBİTAK Ulusal Metroloji Enstitüsü (TÜBİTAK UME), Turkey 5Czech Metrology Institute (CMI), Czech Republic 6Laboratoire National de Métrologie et d’Essais (LNE), France 7VSL Dutch Metrology Institute (VSL), Netherlands EURAMET Supplementary Comparison EURAMET.EM.RF-S27 1/37 Abstract The comparison of a loop antenna factor measurement has been performed. One of the mo- tivations for this comparison was that since the last comparison in this field (CCEM.RF- S21.F), several National Metrology Institutes have implemented the calibration capabilities for antenna measurements. The second motivation is that the loop antennas are typically working over a large frequency range, in this case 10 Hz to 30 MHz. For the calibration over this frequency span, two ranges are distinguished: the low frequency range where Alternat- ing Current (AC) techniques should be used, and the high frequency range where Radio- Frequency (RF) measurement techniques are applied. The comparison shows that the par- ticipants were able to measure within the declared uncertainties. EURAMET Supplementary Comparison EURAMET.EM.RF-S27 2/37 Table of contents 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Historical background ........................................................................................ 4 1.2 Technical background ....................................................................................... 4 1.3 Motivation .......................................................................................................... 4 2 Organisation ................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Participants ........................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Schedule ........................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Unexpected incidents ........................................................................................ 6 3 Travelling standard ......................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Description ........................................................................................................ 7 3.2 Quantities to be measured: ............................................................................... 7 3.2.1 Quantity 1: The antenna factor .......................................................................... 7 3.2.2 Quantity 2: The complex reflection coefficient S11 ........................................... 8 3.3 Measurement instructions ................................................................................. 8 3.4 Deviation from the protocol ................................................................................ 8 4 Method of measurements ............................................................................................... 9 5 Stability of the standard ................................................................................................ 11 6 Measurement results .................................................................................................... 12 6.1 Results ............................................................................................................ 12 6.2 Normalization of the results ............................................................................. 13 6.3 Method of computation of the reference value ................................................ 13 6.4 Degrees of equivalence ................................................................................... 15 7 Summary and conclusions ........................................................................................... 18 8 References ................................................................................................................... 19 9 Annex A: Graphical results for non-mandatory frequencies ......................................... 20 10 Annex B: Graphical S11 at mandatory frequencies ..................................................... 33 11 Annex C: Participants protocol and uncertainty budget................................................ 37 EURAMET Supplementary Comparison EURAMET.EM.RF-S27 3/37 1 Introduction 1.1 Historical background In 2002-2004, the key comparison CCEM.RF-K21.F as well as the supplementary compari- son CCEM.RF-S21.F [3] took place. The aim of theses comparisons was to determine an- tenna factors of different kinds of antennas A. Schwarzbeck tuneable dipole, model UHAP: 300 MHz to 1 GHz B. Rohde & Schwarz log-periodic, model HL223: 200 MHz to 1.3 GHz C. Schaffner Chase bilog, model CBL 6112B: 30 MHz to 2 GHz D. Rohde & Schwarz active monopole HFH2-Z1: 9 kHz to 30 MHz E. EMCO active shielded loop, model 6507: 1 kHz to 30 MHz F. EMCO passive shielded loop, model 7604: 20 Hz to 150 kHz At that time, only four laboratories participated in the comparison: NMi-VSL, AIST, KRISS and NPL. The frequency points were: 20 Hz, 500 Hz, 10 kHz, 100 kHz, 1 MHz, 30 MHz. Since 2003, other National Metrology Institutes (NMI) like CMI, INRIM, LNE, UME, and METAS have implemented the calibration capabilities for loop antennas, so that it would be beneficial to perform a comparison again. 1.2 Technical background A typical loop antenna may cover the frequency range from 10 Hz to 30 MHz. To cover this wide frequency range, Alternating Current (AC) measurement techniques and Radio- Frequency (RF) measurement techniques are needed. The radiation of the antenna may be produced using: - Helmholtz coils - 3 antenna technique - TEM cells A typical broadband antenna calibration may be performed by combining different calibration methods. 1.3 Motivation Due to the time span since the last comparison, and to the technical wide spectrum of this magnetic antenna calibration, it was decided to perform a new comparison for European NMIs. EURAMET Supplementary Comparison EURAMET.EM.RF-S27 4/37 2 Organisation 2.1 Participants The pilot laboratory was METAS: The members of the support group: David Gentle (NPL) Dongsheng Zhao (VSL) The following NMIs participated in the comparison: Acronym Laboratory Contact CMI Czech Metrology Institute Mr Karel Drazil Microwave Measurement Laboratory e-mail: [email protected] Regional Inspectorate Praha phone: +420 266 020 173 (personal) Radiova 3 102 00 Praha CZECH REPUBLIC INRIM Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Mr Michele Borsero Metrologica e-mail: [email protected] Strada delle Cace 91 phone: +39 011 3919 348 (personal) 10135 Torino +39 011 3919.1 (central) ITALY LNE Laboratoire national de métrologie et Mr Yannick Le Sage d’essais e-mail: [email protected] 29, avenue Roger Hennequin phone: +33 1 30 69 32 37 (personal) 78197 Trappes cedex +33 1 30 69 10 00 (central) FRANCE METAS Federal Institute of Metrology METAS Mr Frédéric Pythoud EMC Laboratory e-mail: [email protected] Lindenweg 50 phone: +41 58 38 70 335 (personal) 3003 Bern-Wabern +41 58 38 70 111 (central) SWITZERLAND VSL VSL Mr Dongsheng Zhao Dutch Metrology Institute e-mail: [email protected] Thijsseweg 11 phone: + 31 15 269 1741 (office) 2629JA Delft + 31 15 269 1635 (lab) The Netherlands + 31 15 269 1636 (lab) + 31 15 269 1500 (central) NPL National Physical Laboratory Mr David Gentle Hampton Road e-mail: [email protected] Teddington phone: +44 20 8943 6717 (personal) Middlesex UK +44 20 8977 3222 (central) TW11 0LW UME TÜBİTAK UME Mr Mustafa Cetintas PO 54 e-mail: [email protected] 41470 Gebze - KOCAELİ phone: +90 533 460 79 74 (mobile) TURKEY +90 262 679 50 00 (central) EURAMET Supplementary Comparison EURAMET.EM.RF-S27 5/37 2.2 Schedule The measurements were performed, starting in August of the year 2011, according to the following time plan. Measurement Time Participant August 2011 1. July to 26. August 2011 METAS September 2011 5. to 25. September 2011 NPL October 2011 3. to 21. October 2011 VSL 31. October to 18. November November 2011 - 2011 28. November to 16. December December 2011 METAS (stability control) 2011 January 2012 9. January to 3 February 2012 INRIM February 2012 6. February to 24 February 2012 LNE March 2012 5. March to 23. March 2012 CMI April 2012 METAS (stability control) May - July 2012 14. May to 15. July 2012 UME October 2012 1. October to 30. October 2012 METAS (stability control) Transportation and dispatch No special circulation method has been implemented. The transports were performed by post. On arrival at the participating laboratory, the devices and their packaging were carefully checked for any damage caused during transit. 2.3 Unexpected incidents No incident to the travelling standard was reported. EURAMET Supplementary Comparison EURAMET.EM.RF-S27 6/37 3 Travelling standard 3.1 Description The travelling standard is a shielded passive loop antenna: Magnetic Field Pickup
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Antenna Gain Measurement Using Image Theory
    i ANTENNA GAIN MEASUREMENT USING IMAGE THEORY SANDRAWARMAN A/L BALASUNDRAM A project report submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of the degree Master of Electrical Engineering Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia JANUARY 2014 v ABSTRACT This report presents the measurement result of a passive horn antenna gain by only using metallic reflector and vector network analyzer, according to image theory. This method is an alternative way to conventional methods such as the three antennas method and the two antennas method. The gain values are calculated using a simple formula using the distance between the antenna and reflector, operating frequency, S- parameter and speed of light. The antenna is directed towards an absorber and then directed towards the reflector to obtain the S11 parameter using the vector network analyzer. The experiments are performed in three locations which are in the shielding room, anechoic chamber and open space with distances of 0.5m, 1m, 2m, 3m and 4m. The results calculated are compared and analyzed with the manufacture’s data. The calculated data have the best similarities with the manufacturer data at distance of 0.5m for the anechoic chamber with correlation coefficient of 0.93 and at a distance of 1m for the shield room and open space with correlation coefficient of 0.79 and 0.77 but distort at distances of 2m, 3m and 4m at all of the three places. This proves that the single antenna method using image theory needs less space, time and cost to perform it.
    [Show full text]
  • Price List/Order Terms
    PRICE LIST/ORDER TERMS 575 SE ASHLEY PLACE • GRANTS PASS, OR 97526 PHONE: (800) 736-6677 • FAX: (541) 471-6251 WIRELESS MADE SIMPLE www.linxtechnologies.com RF MODULES Prices Effective 02/04/04 Linx RF modules make it easy and cost-effective to add wireless capabilities to any product. That’s because Linx modules contain all the components necessary for the transmission of RF. Since no external components (except an antenna) are needed, the modules are easily applied, even by persons lacking previous RF design experience. This conserves valuable engineering resources and greatly reduces the product's time to market. Once in production, Linx RF modules improve yields, reduce placement costs, and eliminate the need for testing or adjustment. LC Series - Low-Cost Ultra-Compact RF Data Module The LC Series is ideally suited for volume use in OEM applications, such as remote control, security, identification, and periodic data transfer. Packaged in a compact SMD package, the LC modules utilize a highly optimized SAW architecture to achieve an unmatched blend of performance, size, efficiency and cost. Quantity TX RX-P* RX-S • Complete RF TX/RX solution <200 $5.60 $11.80 $10.90 • Ultra-compact size • Low cost in volume 200-999 $4.90 $10.65 $9.85 • High-performance SAW 1,000-4,999 $4.38 $9.50 $8.90 architecture >5000 Call Call Call • Direct serial interface • Low power consumption Part #’s Description • 5kbps maximum data rate TXM-***-LC LC Series Transmitter • >300ft. range RXM-***-LC-P LC Series Receiver Pinned SMD • No production tuning RXM-***-LC-S LC Series Receiver Compact SMD • No external components =315, 418, 433MHz 418MHz Standard RX-S *** required (except antenna) * = -P version not recommended for new designs • Wide temperature range RX-P LR Series - Long Range, Low Cost RF Data Module NEW The LR Series provides a 5-10 times range improvement over previous discrete and modular solutions and establishes a new benchmark for range performance and cost effectiveness within our product line.
    [Show full text]
  • An Improved Method to Determine the Antenna Factor Wout Joseph and Luc Martens, Member, IEEE
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Ghent University Academic Bibliography 252 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, VOL. 54, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 2005 An Improved Method to Determine the Antenna Factor Wout Joseph and Luc Martens, Member, IEEE Abstract—In this paper, we present an improved method to de- [5] and [6]. These methods make use of tabulated values of termine the antenna factor of three antennas. Instead of using a the maximum field strength for frequencies below 1000 MHz. reflecting ground plane we use absorbers. Destructive interference An advantage of our method is that it is applicable for both E- between the direct beam and the residual reflected beam from the absorbers is avoided by splitting the measured frequency range and H-field probes. For the calibration of loop antennas, two in bands and changing the distance between the two antennas de- methods are described in [7]. The first method is based on cal- pending on the frequency band. Furthermore, this method is ap- culation of the loop impedances. The second method is by gen- plicable for both E- and H-field probes. Our method has also the erating a well-defined standard magnetic field. The first method advantage of being low-cost: The method does not need to be per- cannot be used because the geometric shape of the split-shield formed in an anechoic chamber to obtain high accuracy. To take the residual reflections of the environment into account, we perform a loop probes is not simple.
    [Show full text]
  • C-Band TWG-1 Best Practices Annexes
    ANNEX D Approved June 4, 2020 Terrestrial-Satellite Coexistence During and After the C-Band Transition Technical Work Group #1 Scope of Work 1. Preventing Interference 1.1. Emphasize the need for the FCC to complete its review of the pending C-Band incumbent earth station registration and modification applications in IBFS. 1.2. Agree on relevant data necessary for protection of Earth stations. (All 3.7 GHz Service licensees need to work from a common list of Earth stations.) 1.3. Understand best practices that 3.7 GHz Service licensees use to predict whether the FCC- specified power flux density (PFD) limits will be exceeded at earth station locations. 1.4. Agree on a common method for converting between PFD and power spectral density (PSD) at the Earth station. 1.5. Understand the nature of the Earth station receive filters to ensure that they will be adequate to reject 3.7 GHz Service signals below 3.98 GHz over a range of environmental conditions in order to ensure that the FCC-specified blocking PFD limit is met. 2. Interference Detection 2.1. Develop a procedure for earth stations to positively identify or exclude sources of interference. This procedure should rapidly eliminate non-3.7 GHz Service causes and initiate the inter-service interference resolution process. Consider whether a detection and alerting mechanism could be automated, particularly for major Earth station facilities. 2.2. Develop estimates of distances between 3.7 GHz facilities and earth stations beyond which interference is unlikely. 2.3. Develop a process for positively identifying or excluding sources of 3.7 GHz interference.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Antenna in DS-CDMA Mobile Communication System Using Circular Array Technique
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2003-03 Smart antenna in DS-CDMA mobile communication system using circular array technique Ng, Stewart Siew Loon Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California THESIS SMART ANTENNA IN DS-CDMA MOBILE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM USING CIRCULAR ARRAY TECHNIQUE by Stewart Siew Loon Ng March 2003 Thesis Advisor: Tri Ha Co-Advisor: Jovan Lebaric Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED March 2003 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE: 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Smart Antenna in DS-CDMA Mobile Communication System using Circular Array 6. AUTHOR(S) Stewart Siew Loon Ng 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION REPORT Monterey, CA 93943-5000 NUMBER 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Sound Card Internal Noise 20061128054754 0.0125
    FSM Table of Contents Overview ..................................................................................................................................................2 Configuration............................................................................................................................................3 Hardware ..............................................................................................................................................3 Software................................................................................................................................................4 FSM..................................................................................................................................................4 DPLOT .............................................................................................................................................4 Visual Basic......................................................................................................................................5 Calibration................................................................................................................................................5 Attenuator.............................................................................................................................................5 Receiver Noise Figure ..........................................................................................................................6 FSM Receiver Noise
    [Show full text]
  • Antenna Basics
    ANTENNA BASICS Christof Rohner Antenna Basics 2 C O N T E N T S 1 Introduction 3 2 Antenna Characteristics 4 2.1 Radiation Pattern 4 2.2 Directivity Factor 5 2.3 Gain 5 2.4 Effective Area 6 2.5 Effective Antenna Length 7 2.6 Antenna Factor 8 2.7 Impedances and Resistances 10 3 Basic Characteristics of Selected Antennas 12 3.1 Dipole Antennas 12 3.2 Rod Antennas 16 3.3 Directional Antennas 18 3.4 Active Antennas 23 4 Most Important Antenna Characteristics at a Glance 26 5 Used and Recommended References 27 Basics_e.doc Ro November 1999 Antenna Basics 3 1 Introduction Antennas are used for converting conducted electromagnetic waves into electromagnetic waves freely propagating in space and vice versa (Fig. 1.1). The name is derived from the field of zoology, where the term antennae (Latin) is used to designate the long thin feelers of insects. The oldest existing antennas, eg those used by Heinrich Hertz in 1888 in his first experiments for proving the existence of electromagnetic waves, were neither physically nor functionally separated from high-frequency generators, and up to the present day resonant circuits are taken as models for illustrating certain antenna characteristics. It was not until around and after 1900 that antennas were clearly separated and regarded an independent unit in a radio system as transmitting and receiving stations were set up. Modern antennas often do not differ much from their ancestors in their outward appearance but are usually of highly elaborate design tailored to match the application on hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Nist Calibration Procedure for Vertically Polarized Monopole Antennas, 30 Khz to 300 Mhz
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS Nisr AND TECHNOLOGY NATL INST OF ST4N0 » TECH R.I C A111D3 MT7flflE NIST NIST Technical Note 1347 PUBLICATIONS OCfOO NIST Calibration Procedure di for Vertically Polarized Monopole Antennas, 30 kHz to 300 MHz D. G. Camel! E. B. Larsen J. E. Cruz D. A. Hill Electromagnetic Fields Division Center for Electronics and Electrical Engineering National Engineering Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Boulder, Colorado 80303-3328 \ kV^ U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Robert A. Mosbacher, Secretary NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY, John W. Lyons, Director Issued January 1991 National Institute of Standards and Technology Technical Note 1347 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol., Tech. Note 1347, 28 pages (January 1991) CODEN:NTNOEF U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1991 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 . CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 1 . INTRODUCTION 1 2 . THEORETICAL BASIS 2 3. STANDARD FIELD METHOD FOR CALIBRATING MONOPOLES 4 3 . 1 Description of the Equipment 4 3 . 2 Test Procedure 5 3 . 3 Antenna Factor 6 3 . 4 Calibration Uncertainty 7 4 CONCLUSIONS 8 5 . REFERENCES 8 APPENDIX A: SAMPLE TEST REPORT FOR A VERTICAL MONOPOLE 10 iii . NIST CALIBRATION PROCEDURE FOR VERTICALLY POLARIZED MONOPOLE ANTENNAS, 30 KHZ TO 300 MHZ D.G. Camell, E.B. Larsen, J.E. Cruz, and D.A. Hill Electromagnetic Fields Division National Institute of Standards and Technology Boulder, CO 80303 This report describes the theoretical basis and test procedure for vertically polarized monopole antenna calibrations at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) .
    [Show full text]
  • Lab7 Antenna Demo1.Pdf
    Name:___________________________________ CM#___________ Part I: Antennas 1. Introduction 1 (a) Near field vs. far field • λ, f, and vp are related by λf = v p , in a vacuum or in air. 3×108 m / s 300m / μs • λ = = Note vp = 300 m/μs = 11811”/μs. f in Hz f in MHz 2D2 • Far Field Distance > Whichever is larger: 3λ or , where D is the largest dimension of the λ antenna 1 (b) Circuit quantities: radiation resistance, radiated power 1 (c) Space quantities: radiated field pattern, radiated power pattern E 1 (d) Antenna factor inc Vrec Example: at 80 MHz, we see that AFdB = 9 dB. Therefore, EdBuV = AFdB + CLdB + VAdBuV. Assuming 30 ft of coaxial cable, with 4.5 dB/100 ft loss, we have EdBuV/m = 9 dB + 4.5/3 dB + VAdBuV Note: You may calibrate the Agilent E4402B Spectrum analyzer to display the spectrum in units of dBuV by pressing AMPLITUDE, More, Y Axis Units, dBuV 2 Dipoles and Monopoles 2 (a) A dipole antenna We shall use a standard 30 MHz – 300 MHz biconical broadband receiving antenna. The axis of our biconical antenna will be oriented horizontally, so it responds best to horizontal E field. (See the biconical antenna radiation patterns included in Part 6.) Lab #6 Antennas and Conducted Emission ECE342 Page 1 of 13 Configuration Length Electrical Voltage at Maximum E Frequency Length (in Spectrum field (dBμV/m) (MHz) (m) wavelengths) Analyzer (dBμV) Shortest and 80 horizontal Shortest and 80 vertical Open, mid-length 80 and horizontal Open, mid-length 80 and vertical Open, longest and 80 horizontal Open, longest and 80 vertical 2 (b) A monopole Configuration Length (m) Electrical Voltage at Maximum E Frequency length Spectrum field (MHz) Analyzer (dBμV/m) (dBμV) End Fire 80 Broadside 80 Horizontal Broadside 80 Vertical 2 (c) Twin lead (open-circuit terminated) Configuration Length Electrical Voltage at Maximum E field Frequency (m) Length Spectrum (dBμV/m) (MHz) Analyzer (dBμV) End Fire 80 Broadside 80 Lab #6 Antennas and Conducted Emission ECE342 Page 2 of 13 Vertical Broadside 80 Horizontal 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Antenna Factor for EMC Measurements
    Com-Power Corporation (714) 528-8800 http://www.com-power.com Use of Antenna Factors in EMI Measurements AN-106 AF There are various technical parameters associated with antennas which are commonly studied and defined; including gain, directivity, beamwidth (or beam area), aperture, antenna pattern, antenna temperature, and antenna radiation resistance. The antenna factor is rarely included as one of the basic parameters of an antenna, as it is used almost exclusively in EMI testing when making radiated electric field strength (E-field) measurements. E-field measurements are necessary for determining compliance with most electromagnetic interference requirements/standards, such as FCC Part 15, CISPR 22, EN 55022, etc. Many engineers starting new in the EMC field may find the concept of antenna factor and its explanation useful. This application note defines the antenna factor and explains how this concept simplifies the measurement of E-field using an EMC antenna. Also included in this discussion are the basic parameters of other measurement system components typically used along with the antenna for making E-field measurements. Finally, some practical limitations of this concept are discussed along with precautions to be taken. Antenna Factor Definition: Antenna factor is defined as the ratio of the electromagnetic field incident on the antenna to the voltage output at its output terminal (connector). This is a linear definition expressed in volts per meter (V/m). So, in linear terms, the field strength is equal to the voltage output multiplied by the antenna factor. In practice, a logarithmic expression for the ratio is much simpler to apply, and is more commonly used.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ANTENNA FACTOR by RON HRANAC
    Originally appeared in the July 2012 issue of Communications Technology. THE ANTENNA FACTOR By RON HRANAC In the world of electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) and electromagnetic interference (EMI) testing, a parameter known as "antenna factor" commonly is used. Antenna factor is not widely known in the cable industry, although it is built in to the calculations used for signal leakage measurements as the “0.021” and “f” (frequency) in the microvolts per meter-to-dBmV conversion formula. ( For more on the mathematics of field- strength measurements, see my June 2008 column at www.cable360.net/ct/operations/bestpractices/30008.html). Wikipedia defines antenna factor as “the ratio of the incident electromagnetic field strength to the voltage V (units: V or µV) on the line connection of an antenna. For an electric field antenna, field strength is in units of V/m or µV/m, and the resulting antenna factor AF is in units of 1/m: AF = E/V. “The antenna factor for a given antenna is related closely to the load impedance Z0 connected to the antenna’s terminals.” In other words, antenna factor is the ratio of the field strength of an electromagnetic field incident upon an antenna to the voltage produced by that field across a load of impedance Z0 connected to an antenna’s terminals. (Subsequent references to “antenna terminals” in this article assume those terminals are connected to a suitable load of the desired impedance Z 0). The field strength can be calculated by multiplying the voltage at the antenna’s terminals by the antenna factor.
    [Show full text]
  • 6500 Series Loop Antennas 399293 B
    6500 Series Loop Antennas User Manual ETS-Lindgren Inc. reserves the right to make changes to any product described herein in order to improve function, design, or for any other reason. Nothing contained herein shall constitute ETS-Lindgren Inc. assuming any liability whatsoever arising out of the application or use of any product or circuit described herein. ETS-Lindgren Inc. does not convey any license under its patent rights or the rights of others. © Copyright 2020 by ETS-Lindgren Inc. All Rights Reserved. No part of this document may be copied by any means without written permission from ETS-Lindgren Inc. Trademarks used in this document: The ETS-Lindgren logo is a trademark of ETS-Lindgren Inc. Revision Record MANUAL,6500 SERIES LOOP ANTENNAS | Part #399293, Rev. B Revision Description Date A Initial Release November, 2013 B Revised Release August, 2020 ii www.ets-lindgren.com Table of Contents Notes, Cautions, and Warnings ................................................ v 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................... 7 Model 6502 .................................................................................................... 8 Model 6507 .................................................................................................... 8 Model 6509 .................................................................................................... 9 Models 6511 and 6512 .................................................................................. 9 Standard Configuration
    [Show full text]