C-Band TWG-1 Best Practices Annexes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

C-Band TWG-1 Best Practices Annexes ANNEX D Approved June 4, 2020 Terrestrial-Satellite Coexistence During and After the C-Band Transition Technical Work Group #1 Scope of Work 1. Preventing Interference 1.1. Emphasize the need for the FCC to complete its review of the pending C-Band incumbent earth station registration and modification applications in IBFS. 1.2. Agree on relevant data necessary for protection of Earth stations. (All 3.7 GHz Service licensees need to work from a common list of Earth stations.) 1.3. Understand best practices that 3.7 GHz Service licensees use to predict whether the FCC- specified power flux density (PFD) limits will be exceeded at earth station locations. 1.4. Agree on a common method for converting between PFD and power spectral density (PSD) at the Earth station. 1.5. Understand the nature of the Earth station receive filters to ensure that they will be adequate to reject 3.7 GHz Service signals below 3.98 GHz over a range of environmental conditions in order to ensure that the FCC-specified blocking PFD limit is met. 2. Interference Detection 2.1. Develop a procedure for earth stations to positively identify or exclude sources of interference. This procedure should rapidly eliminate non-3.7 GHz Service causes and initiate the inter-service interference resolution process. Consider whether a detection and alerting mechanism could be automated, particularly for major Earth station facilities. 2.2. Develop estimates of distances between 3.7 GHz facilities and earth stations beyond which interference is unlikely. 2.3. Develop a process for positively identifying or excluding sources of 3.7 GHz interference. (This could be based on identification of the base stations belonging to the 3.7 GHz operator and may involve in-band (3.7 GHz) measurements to identify the strongest source(s). This may also involve consideration of transmitter manufacturer data on OOBE characteristics and may require a process to share manufacturer’s confidential proprietary data on a need to know basis such as using neutral third party for information exchange.) 2.4. Develop a mechanism and process for Earth station and satellite operators experiencing interference to contact 3.7 GHz Service licensees with interference concerns. The mechanism should provide documentation of complaints and actions taken to diagnose and resolve them. 2.5. Develop a method for measuring PFD levels at earth stations. 1 Approved June 4, 2020 3. Interference Mitigation 3.1. Create a toolbox for 3.7 GHz Service licensees to mitigate the impact of 5G base stations on earth stations, including potential interference mitigation strategies that can be implemented by 3.7 GHz Service licensees at the earth stations to assist in interference mitigation. 3.2. Consider whether there are Phase I-specific issues that should be addressed and whether there are minimum processes that can be defined solely for Phase I. 3.3. Develop a process to address situations where the PFD limits are determined to be compliant by measurement or calculation but earth station characteristics, such as look angle, are such that interference nonetheless arises or is likely to arise. See Item 1.4. 4. Interference Enforcement 4.1. Define a process for earth station operators seeking resolution of situations where measurements indicate the PFD at their earth station exceeds the protection limits. 4.2. Consider whether a process should be defined locally or centralized and how to ensure that the appropriate contacts are available to earth station licensees (and updated). Develop a list of points of contact of 3.7 GHz Service licensees for interference reporting and technical questions. 4.3. Consider whether the enforcement process can be expedited through the use of approved third-party firms that can determine compliance with PFD limits or identify interference source by cell/sector. 5. Clarification Needed 5.1. Does there need to be an agreement to allow the 3.7 GHz and Earth Station operators reciprocal site access to conduct their own measurements? 5.2. Is the FCC willing to compile and publish in a convenient format a database of Earth stations eligible for protection? If so, will it be available before the auction? If not, how do we handle pending applications? 5.3. Is the -124 dBW/m2/MHz PFD limit per 3.7 GHz site, per operator, or aggregate? 2 ANNEX E Use of Power Flux Density and Power Spectral Density in Interference Prediction Models by Terrestrial Licensees Submission to Terrestrial-Satellite Coexistence During and After the C-Band Transition Technical Working Group #1 Ref.: TWG1-003 Authors: Neeti Tandon July 16, 2020 Navid Motamed Summary: This submission discusses the use of Power Flux Density (“PFD”) and Power Spectral Density (“PSD”) in the prediction of potential interference to C-band earth stations resulting from 3.7 GHz Service operations. This submission is intended to clarify the real-world use of PFD and PSD to inform further discussions regarding terrestrial-satellite coexistence. This discussion relates entirely to interference modeling and prediction and does not discuss the use or utility of PFD or PSD with respect to earth station operators’ interference detection. PFD Compliance Testing. The C-Band Order states that the FCC will use PFD measurements to determine compliance with the requirement to protect C-band earth stations from out-of-band emissions from terrestrial broadband networks deployed by 3.7 GHz Service licensees. The FCC adopted a PFD limit because compliance with a PFD limit can be measured independently using readily available test equipment (e.g., spectrum analyzer or scanner) without the requiring specific knowledge of either the design and engineering specifications of the terrestrial broadband network or the Fixed Satellite Service (“FSS”) equipment and antenna characteristics. TWG-1 is developing a set of processes and procedures—including, among other things, parameters for test equipment setup, recommendations on the type of measurement antenna, definitions for locations of measurements and corresponding antenna orientation—to ensure uniform and repeatable testing results. The linear relationship for PFD in Watts/m2 is PFD = = (1) which is represented in logarithmic form using corresponding lower-case subscripts (as opposed to upper-case subscripts for the linear equivalents) as = + 20 log ( ) + /MHz) (2) − − 38.55 dB(W/m where: Pr is measured channel power (PSD) in dBW/MHz f is the measurement frequency in MHz 1 TWG1-003 Ref. TWG1-003 Gr is antenna gain of the measurement antenna in dBi Lc is cable (and other) losses in dB A constant of 68.55 can be used if Pr is in dBm rather than dBW, yielding: = ( ) + 20 log ( ) + 68.55 dB(W/m /MHz) (3) − − Similar protocols will be needed for purposes of C-band coordination activities and in the validation of interference claims by earth station operators. FCC PFD Requirements. The C-Band Order authorizing the 3.7 GHz Service requires that, “[t]o protect incumbent earth stations from out-of-band emissions from fixed stations, base stations and mobiles, the power flux density (PFD) of any emissions within the 4000-4200 MHz band must not exceed -124 dBW/m2/MHz as measured at the earth station antenna,” 47 C.F.R. §27.1423(a). The C-Band Order explains that “3.7 GHz Service licensees will be obligated to ensure that the PFD limit at FSS earth stations is not exceeded by base and mobile station emissions, which may require them to limit mobile operations when in the vicinity of an earth station receiver,” ¶ 361. The FCC adopted a PFD limit, rather than a PSD limit, because “[u]sing PFD avoids the complexity of registering complex antenna gain patterns for more than twenty thousand earth stations, and it avoids multiple angular calculations that would be necessary to predict PSD within each satellite receiver,” ¶363. The PFD limit adopted in the C-Band Order is -124 dBW/m2/MHz per licensee at the earth station antenna, which translates to a power spectral density of -128 dBm/MHz in aggregate for each licensee. This PFD “is based on a reference FSS antenna gain of 0 dBi, interference-to- noise (I/N) protection threshold of -6 dB, a 142.8K FSS earth station receiver noise temperature, and results in a calculated PFD of -120 dBW/m2/MHz,” ¶ 363. Thermal noise is calculated from = (4) where k is Boltzman’s constant (1.3810-23 J/K), T is system noise temperature in Kelvin, and B is bandwidth in Hertz. In decibel terms for the FCC’s assumed system noise temperature,1 the earth station receiver input noise power density, Nt, is -147.05 dBW/MHz (-117.05 dBm/MHz). Limiting the interference power density to 6 dB below Nt (i.e., I/N = -6 dB) gives -153.05 dBW/MHz (-123.05 dBm/MHz) as the interference PSD objective. 1 T = 142.8K 2 Ref. TWG1-003 The PFD that corresponds to this interference limit is determined by subtracting the effective area of the receiving antenna, which the FCC assumes to be an isotropic antenna (Gr = 0 dBi): = or Ae = 10log10( ) + 10log10(Gr) 2 2 which is -33.5 dB(m ) at 4000 MHz. Thus, the interference4 PFD limit is -119.55 dBW/m /MHz at 4000 MHz, which the FCC rounds to -120 dBW/m2/MHz. An adjustment of 4 dB is made to allow for multiple interference sources to arrive at an aggregate interference PFD limit of -124 dBW/m2/MHz per licensee.2 All things being equal an I/N of -6 dB means there will be 1.0 dB of link margin degradation. The FCC also stated that “the PFD limit we are adopting accounts for the potential of aggregate interference and will protect FSS earth stations from harmful interference,” ¶ 364.
Recommended publications
  • Antenna Gain Measurement Using Image Theory
    i ANTENNA GAIN MEASUREMENT USING IMAGE THEORY SANDRAWARMAN A/L BALASUNDRAM A project report submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of the degree Master of Electrical Engineering Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia JANUARY 2014 v ABSTRACT This report presents the measurement result of a passive horn antenna gain by only using metallic reflector and vector network analyzer, according to image theory. This method is an alternative way to conventional methods such as the three antennas method and the two antennas method. The gain values are calculated using a simple formula using the distance between the antenna and reflector, operating frequency, S- parameter and speed of light. The antenna is directed towards an absorber and then directed towards the reflector to obtain the S11 parameter using the vector network analyzer. The experiments are performed in three locations which are in the shielding room, anechoic chamber and open space with distances of 0.5m, 1m, 2m, 3m and 4m. The results calculated are compared and analyzed with the manufacture’s data. The calculated data have the best similarities with the manufacturer data at distance of 0.5m for the anechoic chamber with correlation coefficient of 0.93 and at a distance of 1m for the shield room and open space with correlation coefficient of 0.79 and 0.77 but distort at distances of 2m, 3m and 4m at all of the three places. This proves that the single antenna method using image theory needs less space, time and cost to perform it.
    [Show full text]
  • Automatic Measurement of Rf Signal Spatial Properties and Antenna Patterns
    AUTOMATIC MEASUREMENT OF RF SIGNAL SPATIAL PROPERTIES AND ANTENNA PATTERNS Ing. Michal VAVRDA, Doctoral Degree Programme (2) Dept. of Radio Electronics, FEEC, BUT E-mail: [email protected] Ing. Ivo HERTL, Doctoral Degree Programme (2) Dept. of Radio Electronics, FEEC, BUT E-mail: [email protected] Supervised by: Dr. Zdeněk Nováček ABSTRACT Radio frequency signal measurement site is described in the presented paper. It enables direction setting by antenna rotator and signal frequency scanning and consequently measuring the parameters using a receiver. The site has two basic uses: measuring of antenna pattern; scanning and locating of RF signal. The site and its operation are made universally, the accuracy depends of rotator quality and parameter amount depends of receiver type. 1 INTRODUCTION The current development in wireless communication requires powerful technologies for antenna testing and signal measuring. Sophisticated devices measure plenty signal parameters, but there is not simply site, which combines the use of these devices with antenna rotator system for measuring the spatial properties of signal also. In this work the site for scanning, locating and measuring of radio frequency signal and measuring and testing the spatial properties of antennas is designed. It consists of antenna system, antenna rotor, receiver and control unit (rotator controller, PC and operating software). The antenna system and receiver type both has to be chosen depending on the measuring conditions (service, frequency band, bandwidth, polarisation, etc.). The locating accuracy is increased with antenna directivity but the necessary number of measuring directions is also increased. The antenna rotor quality determines the accuracy of location.
    [Show full text]
  • Price List/Order Terms
    PRICE LIST/ORDER TERMS 575 SE ASHLEY PLACE • GRANTS PASS, OR 97526 PHONE: (800) 736-6677 • FAX: (541) 471-6251 WIRELESS MADE SIMPLE www.linxtechnologies.com RF MODULES Prices Effective 02/04/04 Linx RF modules make it easy and cost-effective to add wireless capabilities to any product. That’s because Linx modules contain all the components necessary for the transmission of RF. Since no external components (except an antenna) are needed, the modules are easily applied, even by persons lacking previous RF design experience. This conserves valuable engineering resources and greatly reduces the product's time to market. Once in production, Linx RF modules improve yields, reduce placement costs, and eliminate the need for testing or adjustment. LC Series - Low-Cost Ultra-Compact RF Data Module The LC Series is ideally suited for volume use in OEM applications, such as remote control, security, identification, and periodic data transfer. Packaged in a compact SMD package, the LC modules utilize a highly optimized SAW architecture to achieve an unmatched blend of performance, size, efficiency and cost. Quantity TX RX-P* RX-S • Complete RF TX/RX solution <200 $5.60 $11.80 $10.90 • Ultra-compact size • Low cost in volume 200-999 $4.90 $10.65 $9.85 • High-performance SAW 1,000-4,999 $4.38 $9.50 $8.90 architecture >5000 Call Call Call • Direct serial interface • Low power consumption Part #’s Description • 5kbps maximum data rate TXM-***-LC LC Series Transmitter • >300ft. range RXM-***-LC-P LC Series Receiver Pinned SMD • No production tuning RXM-***-LC-S LC Series Receiver Compact SMD • No external components =315, 418, 433MHz 418MHz Standard RX-S *** required (except antenna) * = -P version not recommended for new designs • Wide temperature range RX-P LR Series - Long Range, Low Cost RF Data Module NEW The LR Series provides a 5-10 times range improvement over previous discrete and modular solutions and establishes a new benchmark for range performance and cost effectiveness within our product line.
    [Show full text]
  • An Improved Method to Determine the Antenna Factor Wout Joseph and Luc Martens, Member, IEEE
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Ghent University Academic Bibliography 252 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, VOL. 54, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 2005 An Improved Method to Determine the Antenna Factor Wout Joseph and Luc Martens, Member, IEEE Abstract—In this paper, we present an improved method to de- [5] and [6]. These methods make use of tabulated values of termine the antenna factor of three antennas. Instead of using a the maximum field strength for frequencies below 1000 MHz. reflecting ground plane we use absorbers. Destructive interference An advantage of our method is that it is applicable for both E- between the direct beam and the residual reflected beam from the absorbers is avoided by splitting the measured frequency range and H-field probes. For the calibration of loop antennas, two in bands and changing the distance between the two antennas de- methods are described in [7]. The first method is based on cal- pending on the frequency band. Furthermore, this method is ap- culation of the loop impedances. The second method is by gen- plicable for both E- and H-field probes. Our method has also the erating a well-defined standard magnetic field. The first method advantage of being low-cost: The method does not need to be per- cannot be used because the geometric shape of the split-shield formed in an anechoic chamber to obtain high accuracy. To take the residual reflections of the environment into account, we perform a loop probes is not simple.
    [Show full text]
  • ANTENNA ROTATOR DESIGN and CONTROL by MUHAMMAD RUSYDI BIN BUCHEK 14302 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requ
    ANTENNA ROTATOR DESIGN AND CONTROL by MUHAMMAD RUSYDI BIN BUCHEK 14302 Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the Bachelor of Engineering (Hons) (Electrical & Electronics Engineering) SEPTEMBER 2014 Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS Bandar Seri Iskandar 31750 Tronoh, Perak Darul Ridzuan CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL Antenna Rotator Design and Control by Muhammad Rusydi bin Buchek 14302 A project dissertation submitted to the Electrical & Electronics Engineering Programme Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING (Hons) (ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONICS) Approved by, _____________________ (AP Dr Mohd Noh Karsiti) UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI PETRONAS TRONOH, PERAK September 2014 i CERTIFICATION OF ORIGINALITY This is to certify that I am responsible for the work submitted in this project, that the original work is my own except as specified in the references and acknowledgements, and that the original work contained herein have not been undertaken or done by unspecified sources or persons. ___________________________________________ MUHAMMAD RUSYDI BIN BUCHEK ii ABSTRACT This paper consists of design and development of rotator for antenna positioning according to the desired azimuth and elevation. The rotator is to have the capability to be manually controlled (press button switch) or software driven. It should incorporate safety stop switches as well as position and speed sensors in order to achieve smooth movement and correct stopping position. The basic principle needs to be studies are speed control using the microcontroller, exact angle of position movement, and stoppable motor can be done in time due to emergency cases. As larger load is applied to the device, the large inertia will need to be compensated to achieve a good dynamic.
    [Show full text]
  • Programmable Antenna Rotator VH226F User's Manual
    Programmable Antenna Rotator VH226F User's Manual Unpacking Installing the Outdoor Drive Make sure the following pieces are in the box: Unit (1) Drive unit Step 1: Attach cable to the drive unit (1) Control unit 1. Run cable (not included) to the drive unit. (1) Remote control IMPORTANT: Up to 150’ (46m) of 20AWG 3 Hardware kit: conductor cable may be used. For longer runs, use heavier (2) U Bolts gauge wire. (5) Rotor-Mounting Bolts 2. Unscrew the single screw on the bottom door. Swing (3) Short Brackets the door open. (1) Long Bracket (with guy-wire holes) 3. Insert the cable through the grommet on the side of (10) Nuts the drive unit. (8) Washers 4. Separate the cable leads for 1.5”(4cm) and strip off Note: Bolts require a 10mm or adjustable wrench (not the insulation for 0.5”. included). continues on next page... This is class II equipment designed with double or reinforced insulation so it does Important Information not require a safety connection to electrical earth (US: ground). The MAINS plug is used as the disconnect device, the disconnect device shall IMPORTANT SAFETY INSTRUCTIONS remain readily operable. PLEASE READ AND SAVE FOR FUTURE REFERENCE Plugging in for power AC OUTLET POWER SUPPLY: 100–240 V ~ 50/60 Hz The AC power plug is polarized (one blade is wider than the other) and only fits into AC power outlets one way. If the plug will not go into the outlet completely, WARNING: turn the plug over and try to insert it the other way.
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive Radio Technology This Page Intentionally Left Blank Fettechapt Prelims.Qxd 6/27/06 9:57 AM Page Iii
    FetteChapt_Prelims.qxd 6/27/06 9:57 AM Page i Cognitive Radio Technology This page intentionally left blank FetteChapt_Prelims.qxd 6/27/06 9:57 AM Page iii Cognitive Radio Technology Edited by Bruce A. Fette AMSTERDAM • BOSTON • HEIDELBERG • LONDON • NEW YORK • OXFORD • PARIS • SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO • SINGAPORE • SYDNEY • TOKYO Newness is an important of Elsevier FetteChapt_Prelims.qxd 6/27/06 9:57 AM Page iv Newnes is an imprint of Elsevier 30 Corporate Drive, Suite 400, Burlington, MA 01803, USA Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford OX2 8DP, UK Copyright © 2006, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone: (ϩ44) 1865 843830, fax: (ϩ44) 1865 853333, E-mail: HYPERLINK "mailto:[email protected]" [email protected]. You may also complete your request on-line via the Elsevier homepage (http://elsevier.com), by selecting “Support & Contact” then “Copyright and Permission” and then “Obtaining Permissions.” Recognizing the importance of preserving what has been written, Elsevier prints its books on acid-free paper whenever possible. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Cognitive radio technology / edited by Bruce A. Fette.—1st ed. p. cm.—(Communications engineering series) Includes bibliographical references and index ISBN-13: 978-0-7506-7952-7 (alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-7506-7952-2 (alk. paper) 1. Software radio. 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Spotting IMAGE
    Editor-in-Chief Joe Kornowski, KB6IGK Assistant Editors Bernhard Jatzeck, VA6BMJ Douglas Quagliana, KA2UPW/5 W.M. Red Willoughby, KC4LE Paul Graveline, K1YUB Volume 41, Number 3 MayJune 2018 in this issue ... Spotting Apogee View .................................3 IMAGE by Joe Spier • K6WAO Engineering Update .....................5 by Jerry Buxton • N0JY ARISS Update ...............................7 by Frank Bauer • KA3HDO Recovering NASA’s IMAGE Satellite Using the Doppler Effect ..............................................8 by Scott Tilley • VE7TIL A Whole Orbit Data Simulation Based on Orbit Prediction Software...................11 by Carl E. Wick • N3MIM Evolution of the Vita 74 Standard (VNX) for CubeSat Applications ................................14 by Bill Ripley • KY5Q Jorge Piovesan Alonzo Vera • KG5RGV Patrick Collier AMSAT Academy at Duke City Hamfest ..............................19 My Great Spring Rove 2018 ......20 by Paul Overn • KE0PBR Wireless Autonomic Antenna Follower Rotator .......21 by Horacio Bouzas • VA6DTX Hamvention Photo Gallery .....24 mailing offices mailing and at additional at and At Kensington, MD Kensington, At Kensington, MD 20895-2526 MD Kensington, POSTAGE PAID POSTAGE 10605 Concord St., Suite 304 Suite St., Concord 10605 Periodicals AMSAT-NA T EO-P Are you ready for Fox 1C 1D ? Missing out on all the M2 offers a complete line of top uality amateur, commercial action on the latest birds The M2 EO-Pack is a great and military grade antennas, positioners solution for EO communication. ou do not need an and accessories. eleation rotator for casual operation, but eleation will allow full gain oer the entire pass. We produce the finest off-the-shelf and custom radio freuency products aailable anywhere. The 2MCP8A is a circularly polaried antenna optimied for the 2M satellite band.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Antenna in DS-CDMA Mobile Communication System Using Circular Array Technique
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2003-03 Smart antenna in DS-CDMA mobile communication system using circular array technique Ng, Stewart Siew Loon Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California THESIS SMART ANTENNA IN DS-CDMA MOBILE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM USING CIRCULAR ARRAY TECHNIQUE by Stewart Siew Loon Ng March 2003 Thesis Advisor: Tri Ha Co-Advisor: Jovan Lebaric Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED March 2003 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE: 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Smart Antenna in DS-CDMA Mobile Communication System using Circular Array 6. AUTHOR(S) Stewart Siew Loon Ng 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION REPORT Monterey, CA 93943-5000 NUMBER 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Sound Card Internal Noise 20061128054754 0.0125
    FSM Table of Contents Overview ..................................................................................................................................................2 Configuration............................................................................................................................................3 Hardware ..............................................................................................................................................3 Software................................................................................................................................................4 FSM..................................................................................................................................................4 DPLOT .............................................................................................................................................4 Visual Basic......................................................................................................................................5 Calibration................................................................................................................................................5 Attenuator.............................................................................................................................................5 Receiver Noise Figure ..........................................................................................................................6 FSM Receiver Noise
    [Show full text]
  • Antenna System for a Ground Station Communicating with the NTNU Test Satellite (NUTS)
    Antenna system for a ground station communicating with the NTNU Test Satellite (NUTS) Beathe Hagen Stenhaug Master of Science in Electronics Submission date: July 2011 Supervisor: Odd Gutteberg, IET Norwegian University of Science and Technology Department of Electronics and Telecommunications Problem Description NTNU is planning to develop and launch a student satellite named NUTS. This satellite will need a ground station for transmitting commands and receiv- ing telemetry. The ground station will be located at NTNU premises, utilizing the existing antenna pedestal. The task is to analyze, design, build and test a scale model antenna system for this ground station. The work should focus on an array antenna consisting of either 2 or 4 helical elements. The preliminary specications are Center frequency: 437 MHz. Bandwidth: The bandwidth should as a minimum, cover the actual am- ateur frequency band [435-439 MHz], as well as the anticipated Doppler shift. Antenna gain: Approximately 12 - 20 dB. The actual gain will be based on the revised link budget. Interface: Compatible with the receiver/transmitter to be used. Steerability: 0 - 360 degrees in azimuth and 0 - 180 degrees in elevation. Environmental specication: Operational wind velocity: 15 m/s. In addition to designing and building the antenna system, a feasibility study of the various available tracking systems should be carried out. Assignment given: February 2011 Supervisor: Odd Gutteberg, IET Preface This document is my master thesis carried out in the spring of 2011 at the De- partment of Electronics and Telecommunication (IET) at the Norwegian Uni- versity of Science and Technology (NTNU). NTNU is the third university to join the ANSAT (Norwegian Student Satellite Program), and the goal with ANSAT is to have three student satellites launched before the end of 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Antenna Basics
    ANTENNA BASICS Christof Rohner Antenna Basics 2 C O N T E N T S 1 Introduction 3 2 Antenna Characteristics 4 2.1 Radiation Pattern 4 2.2 Directivity Factor 5 2.3 Gain 5 2.4 Effective Area 6 2.5 Effective Antenna Length 7 2.6 Antenna Factor 8 2.7 Impedances and Resistances 10 3 Basic Characteristics of Selected Antennas 12 3.1 Dipole Antennas 12 3.2 Rod Antennas 16 3.3 Directional Antennas 18 3.4 Active Antennas 23 4 Most Important Antenna Characteristics at a Glance 26 5 Used and Recommended References 27 Basics_e.doc Ro November 1999 Antenna Basics 3 1 Introduction Antennas are used for converting conducted electromagnetic waves into electromagnetic waves freely propagating in space and vice versa (Fig. 1.1). The name is derived from the field of zoology, where the term antennae (Latin) is used to designate the long thin feelers of insects. The oldest existing antennas, eg those used by Heinrich Hertz in 1888 in his first experiments for proving the existence of electromagnetic waves, were neither physically nor functionally separated from high-frequency generators, and up to the present day resonant circuits are taken as models for illustrating certain antenna characteristics. It was not until around and after 1900 that antennas were clearly separated and regarded an independent unit in a radio system as transmitting and receiving stations were set up. Modern antennas often do not differ much from their ancestors in their outward appearance but are usually of highly elaborate design tailored to match the application on hand.
    [Show full text]