DOCSLIB.ORG

Concerning the Endangered Kanab Ambersnail (Oxyloma Haydeni Kanabense) in Arizona and Utah

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Concerning the Endangered Kanab Ambersnail (Oxyloma Haydeni Kanabense) in Arizona and Utah Anatomical and Genetic Variation of Western Oxyloma (Pulmonata: Succineidae) Concerning the Endangered Kanab Ambersnail (Oxyloma haydeni kanabense) in Arizona and Utah Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5164 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Foreground photograph: Kanab ambersnail (Oxyloma haydeni kanabense). Background photograph: Vasey’s Paradise waterfalls, Colorado River, Arizona. Photograph taken by Jeff Sorensen, Arizona Game and Fish Department. Anatomical and Genetic Variation of Western Oxyloma (Pulmonata: Succineidae) Concerning the Endangered Kanab Ambersnail (Oxyloma haydeni kanabense) in Arizona and Utah By Melanie Culver, Hans-Werner Herrmann, Mark Miller, Barry Roth, and Jeff Sorenson Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5164 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2013 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Culver, Melanie, Herrmann, Hans-Werner, Miller, Mark, Roth, Barry, and Sorenson, Jeff, 2013, Anatomical and genetic variation of western Oxyloma (Pulmonata: Succineidae) concerning the endangered Kanab ambersnail (Oxyloma haydeni kanabense) in Arizona and Utah: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report, 2013–5164, 66 p., http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2013/5164/. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................2 Background Information on Subspecies Trinomial .........................................................................4 Molecular Genetic Markers Used .....................................................................................................4 Study Objectives ...................................................................................................................................5 Purpose and Scope ..............................................................................................................................5 Methods ..........................................................................................................................................................5 Specimen Collection ............................................................................................................................5 Shell Morphology .................................................................................................................................7 Soft Tissue Anatomy .............................................................................................................................8 DNA Isolation.........................................................................................................................................8 Genetic Analyses ..................................................................................................................................8 Mitochondrial DNA ......................................................................................................................8 Data Generation ..................................................................................................................8 Nuclear DNA.................................................................................................................................9 Single Copy ..........................................................................................................................9 Markers from Other Studies ....................................................................................9 Genomic Library .........................................................................................................9 Data Analyses—Mitochondrial DNA and Nuclear Single Copy DNA ............10 Microsatellite (Single Locus) ..........................................................................................10 Genomic Library .......................................................................................................11 PCR Conditions .........................................................................................................11 AFLP (Multilocus) ..............................................................................................................11 Data Generation .......................................................................................................11 Data Analyses ..........................................................................................................11 Results ...........................................................................................................................................................12 Specimen Collection ..........................................................................................................................12 Shell Morphology ................................................................................................................................12 Principal Components Analysis ...............................................................................................12 Discriminant Analysis................................................................................................................18 Soft Tissue Anatomy ...........................................................................................................................18 DNA Isolation.......................................................................................................................................18 Genetic Analyses ...............................................................................................................................18 Mitochondrial DNA ....................................................................................................................26 Nuclear DNA...............................................................................................................................30 Single Copy ........................................................................................................................38 Microsatellite (Single Locus) ..........................................................................................42 AFLP (Multilocus) ..............................................................................................................50 iv Contents—Continued Discussion ....................................................................................................................................................52 Shell Morphology ................................................................................................................................52 Soft Tissue Anatomy ...........................................................................................................................52 Morphology and Anatomy—Taxonomic-Nomenclatural Considerations .................................53 Genetics................................................................................................................................................53 Each Marker Separate ..............................................................................................................54 Markers Combined ....................................................................................................................56 Conservation Implications .................................................................................................................56 Future Research ..........................................................................................................................................57 Summary........................................................................................................................................................57 Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................................57 References Cited..........................................................................................................................................58 Glossary of Molecular Genetic Terms ......................................................................................................63 Appendix A. Genbank Accession Numbers ...........................................................................................65 Appendix B. DNA Sequences for Random Ambersnail Nuclear Clone 356 ......................................65 Appendix C. DNA Sequences for Ribosomal First and Second
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mollusca) from Malta
    The Central Mediterranean Naturalist 4 (1): 35 - 40 Malta: December 2003 ON SOME ALIEN TERRESTRIAL AND FRESHWATER GASTROPODS (MOLLUSCA) FROM MALTA Constantine Mifsud!, Paul Sammut2 and Charles Cachia3 ABSTRACT Nine species of gastropod molluscs: Otala lactea (0. F. MUller, 1774); Cemuella virgata (da Costa, 1778); Cochlicella barbara (Linnaeus, 1758); Oxychilus helveticus (Blum, 1881); Succinea putris (Linnaeus, 1758); Oxyloma elegans (Risso, 1826); Helisoma duryi Wetherby, 1879; Planorbarius comeus (Linnaeus, 1758); and the limacid slug Lehmannia valentiana (A. Ferussac, 1822) are recorded for the first time as alien species from local plant nurseries. For each species a short description and notes on distribution and ecology are given. INTRODUCTION The land and fresh water Mollusca of the Maltese Islands have been recently well treated by Giusti et al. (1995). However, during the last twelve years many non-indigenous plants, shrubs and trees, both decorative species and fruit trees, have been imported from Europe either to embellish local gardens or roadsides or for agricultural purposes. It occurred to the authors that there is the possibility that alien species of molluscs might have been introduced accidentally with these imported plants. This is not a completely new phenomenon. For example, Pomatias elegans and Discus rotundatus occur at San Anton Gardens were they were probably alien introductions due to human activities (Thake, 1973). During recent research to assess the status of some of the endemic molluscs of the Maltese Islands, with special emphasis on the Limacidae, areas where imported plants are stocked were searched for any alien species. This resulted in the discovery of several alien species of terrestrial and freshwater snails, a few of them alive.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017
    Washington Natural Heritage Program List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017 The following list of animals known from Washington is complete for resident and transient vertebrates and several groups of invertebrates, including odonates, branchipods, tiger beetles, butterflies, gastropods, freshwater bivalves and bumble bees. Some species from other groups are included, especially where there are conservation concerns. Among these are the Palouse giant earthworm, a few moths and some of our mayflies and grasshoppers. Currently 857 vertebrate and 1,100 invertebrate taxa are included. Conservation status, in the form of range-wide, national and state ranks are assigned to each taxon. Information on species range and distribution, number of individuals, population trends and threats is collected into a ranking form, analyzed, and used to assign ranks. Ranks are updated periodically, as new information is collected. We welcome new information for any species on our list. Common Name Scientific Name Class Global Rank State Rank State Status Federal Status Northwestern Salamander Ambystoma gracile Amphibia G5 S5 Long-toed Salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum Amphibia G5 S5 Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum Amphibia G5 S3 Ensatina Ensatina eschscholtzii Amphibia G5 S5 Dunn's Salamander Plethodon dunni Amphibia G4 S3 C Larch Mountain Salamander Plethodon larselli Amphibia G3 S3 S Van Dyke's Salamander Plethodon vandykei Amphibia G3 S3 C Western Red-backed Salamander Plethodon vehiculum Amphibia G5 S5 Rough-skinned Newt Taricha granulosa
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Conference Opinions Glen Canyon
    United States DeDanment... of Lh.e Interior Fish and Wildlife Se:vice Arizona EcJlogic:l1 Se..-.rices Field Office 2:321 w. Roy.I P::.1.r:l Road. Suite 103 Ph.oeni:::. ArizoC!.2. 85021-:'9S1 • [n Reply R.efC" To: (602) 640-2:7"-0 M..::; (602) 640-ZT.!Q ABSO/SE 2-21-93-F-167 February 16, 1996 MEM:ORAND illvf TO: Regional Director, Bureau of Reciamation. Salt La.1ce Cicy, Utah FRO~!: Field Supervisor SUBJECT: Biological and Conference Opinions on OpeT:arion of Glen Canyon Dam ­ Conrrolled Rele3.Se for Habitat and Beach Building (Your Refere:lce UC-320, aN-l.OO) The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has reviewed the Bureau of Reclamation's proposed. test of beachlhabir:at-building flow (rest flow) from Glen Canyon Dam. in spring 1996 in the CoLorado Rivet: located in Coconino County, Arizona. Your November 20, 1995, request for formal consultation was received on November 21, 1995. This doc..uneru: represents the Service's biological and conference opinions on the effects of that action on the following endangered •• species: humpback: chub (Gila cypha); Kanab ambermail (Oxy{oma. haydeni kCJwbensis); and southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidon.ax traillii e:xtimus); and on critic:tl habitat for the humpback: chub and proposed. critical habitat for southwes-..ern willow flyC3.!Cher, in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act), as ame::lde:i, (16 U.S.C. 1531 ec seq.). Tnese biologiCJ..1 and confere~ opinions are based. on information provided in the November 1995 biological assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered and Threatened Animals of Utah
    Endangered and Threatened Animals of Utah Quinney Professorship for Wildlife Conflict Management Jack H. Berryman Institute U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Utah Department of Natural Resources Division of Wildlife Resources Utah State University Extension Service Endangered and Threatened Animals of Utah 1998 Acknowledgments This publication was produced by Utah State University Extension Service Department of Fisheries and Wildlife The Jack H. Berryman Institute Utah Division of Wildlife U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Extension and Publications Contributing Authors Purpose and Introduction Terry Messmer Marilet Zablan Mammals Boyde Blackwell Athena Menses Birds Frank Howe Fishes Leo Lentsch Terry Messmer Richard Drake Reptiles and Invertebrates Terry Messmer Richard Drake Utah Sensitive Species List Frank Howe Editors Terry Messmer Richard Drake Audrey McElrone Publication Publication Assistance by Remani Rajagopal Layout and design by Gail Christensen USU Publication Design and Production Quinney Professorship for Wildlife Conflict Management This bulletin was developed under the auspices of the Quinney Professorship for Wildlife Conflict Management through the sponsorship of the S. J. and Jessie E. Quinney Foundation in partnership with the College of Natural Resources, Jack H. Berryman Institute for Wild- life Damage Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Utah Department of Natural Resources, and Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. i Contents Purpose of this Guide . iii Introduction . v What are endangered and threatened species? . vi Why some species become endangered or threatened? . vi Why protect endangered species? . vi The Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) . viii Mammals Black-footed Ferret . 1 Grizzly Bear . 5 Gray Wolf . 9 Utah Prairie Dog . 13 Birds Bald Eagle .
    [Show full text]
  • Mollusks : Carnegie Museum of Natural History
    Mollusks : Carnegie Museum of Natural History Home Pennsylvania Species Virginia Species Land Snail Ecology Resources Contact Virginia Land Snails Oxyloma retusum (I. Lea, 1834) Family: Succineidae Common name: Blunt Ambersnail Identification Length: 6-14 mm Whorls: 3 This ambersnail is intermediate in size. It has shallower sutures and flatter whorls, giving it a more streamlined look than Catinella vermeta. It also has a taller aperture, about 2/3 the total shell length. The basal margin of its aperture may appear nearly flat, although this may vary to more rounded. The animal is stippled with small black spots, which form bands on top of the head, including a stripe to each antennae. Ecology Oxyloma retusum is often found in damp fields or shoreline habitats, sometimes at high densities in the warmer months. It may be seen crawling in muddy areas or on wetland plants (Hubricht 1985). Along a small lake in Maryland, this species was eating mostly dead plants in the spring, but both live and dead plants in summer and fall (Örstan, 2006). In Maryland a few individuals of this species survive the winter, then grow until the end of June when the larger animals die off following an initial mating period (Örstan, 2006). Offspring from the first mating period Photo(s): Live Oxyloma retusum by Bill engage in their own mating in late summer. Survivors of the spring and late summer generations enter winter Frank ©. Museum specimen by Ken hibernation. Hotopp ©. Courtship is initiated by one snail crawling onto the shell of another and crawling around the shell apex toward Click photo(s) to enlarge.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inventory of the Land Snails and Slugs (Gastropoda: Caenogastropoda and Pulmonata) of Knox County, Tennessee Author(S): Barbara J
    An Inventory of the Land Snails and Slugs (Gastropoda: Caenogastropoda and Pulmonata) of Knox County, Tennessee Author(s): Barbara J. Dinkins and Gerald R. Dinkins Source: American Malacological Bulletin, 36(1):1-22. Published By: American Malacological Society https://doi.org/10.4003/006.036.0101 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.4003/006.036.0101 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Amer. Malac. Bull. 36(1): 1–22 (2018) An Inventory of the Land Snails and Slugs (Gastropoda: Caenogastropoda and Pulmonata) of Knox County, Tennessee Barbara J. Dinkins1 and Gerald R. Dinkins2 1Dinkins Biological Consulting, LLC, P O Box 1851, Powell, Tennessee 37849, U.S.A [email protected] 2McClung Museum of Natural History and Culture, 1327 Circle Park Drive, Knoxville, Tennessee 37916, U.S.A. Abstract: Terrestrial mollusks (land snails and slugs) are an important component of the terrestrial ecosystem, yet for most species their distribution is not well known.
    [Show full text]
  • (Gastropoda, Euthyneura), I. Amphibuliminae
    BASTERIA 37: 51-56, 1973 Catalogue of Bulimulidae (Gastropoda, Euthyneura), I. Amphibuliminae A.S.H. Breure Utrecht INTRODUCTION The Bulimulidae constitute a relatively large family, mainly confined South At 144 and to America. present the family includes genera number of subgenera. The specific and subspecific names available is estimated at about 3000. The subdivision of the family into Bulimulinae, Amphibuliminae, Odontostominae and Orthalicinae Placostylinae, is mainly based on shell features. This sensu lato conception of the Bulimulidae, already held by Pilsbry (1895-1902) and Thiele (1929-1931), is also favoured the by present author. More recent authors, e.g., Zilch (1959-1960), have accorded family rank to the subfamilies, the Placostylinae except- ed. However, the differences between the subfamilies are comparatively the differ from Bulimulinae slight, e.g., Amphibuliminae seem to the in the and the free muscle only palleal organs retractor system (Van Mol, 1971). in The Amphibuliminae are my opinion entirely confined to South A in which America. few African genera are included this subfamily, may better be placed elsewhere. The genus Aillya Odhner, 1928, occurring in Cameroon (West Africa), is placed here by Odhner (1928) on account of the anatomy. Baker (1955) placed the Aillyidae in the Heterurethra, near the Succineidae. Another African genus included in the Amphibuliminae is Prestonella Connolly, 1929. It occurs in South and is unknown. Africa its anatomy Some Asiatic species, referred to this subfamily, are also excluded from the present catalogue. 52 BASTERIA, Vol. 37, No. 3-4, 1973 The classification of the following Amphibuliminae is mainly ac- cording to Zilch (1959-1960): Simpulopsis (Simpulopsis) Beck, 1837.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 150/Monday, August 9, 2021
    43470 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 150 / Monday, August 9, 2021 / Proposed Rules How can I get copies of the proposed digital television service, including Federal Communications Commission. action and other related information? propagation characteristics that allow Thomas Horan, EPA has established a docket for this undesired signals and noise to be Chief of Staff, Media Bureau. receivable at relatively far distances and action under Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– Proposed Rule OAR–2021–0208. EPA has also nearby electrical devices to cause developed a website for this proposal, interference. According to the For the reasons discussed in the which is available at https:// Petitioner, it has received numerous preamble, the Federal Communications www.epa.gov/regulations-emissions- complaints of poor or no reception from Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR vehicles-and-engines/proposed-rule- viewers, and explains the importance of part 73 as follows: revise-existing-national-ghg-emissions. a strong over-the-air signal in the Portland area during emergencies, PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST Please refer to the notice of proposed SERVICES rulemaking for detailed information on when, it states, cable and satellite accessing information related to the service may go out of operation. Finally, ■ 1. The authority citation for part 73 proposal. the Petitioner demonstrated that the continues to read as follows: channel 21 noise limited contour would Dated: July 29, 2021. fully encompass the existing channel 12 Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 155, 301, 303, William Charmley, contour, and an analysis using the 307, 309, 310, 334, 336, 339. Director, Assessment and Standards Division, Commission’s TVStudy software ■ 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Gastropods (Snail & Slugs) of Los Angeles
    Land gastropods (snails & slugs) of Los Angeles County Why snails? • Many local species are endemic to Southern California • In fact, land snails are highly endemic around the world. • They evolve adaptations to relatively small locations. • Habitat destruction has put many land snails at high risk of extinction, including almost all of the endemic species in Southern California. Papustyla pulcherrima Manus Green Tree Snail Found: Manus Island, Papua New Guinea Facts: green color is natural but is only in outer protein layer of shell Lifestyle: tree snail, lives in island rainforests Conservation status: Endangered due to over-collection by humans and habitat (native tree) loss from logging Achatinella fulgens O`ahu tree snail Found: O`ahu, Hawaii Facts: sinestral (left-coiling), 41 species, 30 species extinct Lifestyle: tree snail, eats fungus off tree leaves Conservation status: Critically endangered due to predation by rats, introduced snails, and habitat (native tree) loss Zonitoides arboreus S.L.I.M.E Snails & slugs Living Oxychilus sp. In Metropolitan Environments Goals of SLIME • Inventory of living snail species in Los Angeles County • Compare with Museum historical records • Note introductions and extinctions • Ask where and why do populations live where they do What role do snails play in the environment? Many snails are decomposers. Decomposers consume dead or dying leaves, wood, and fungus. Without snails and other decomposers it would take much longer for nutrients to cycle through the environment: that is, move from living things to the soil, then back into living things again. Which snails and slugs are considered pests? Why? Pest snails are those that cause damage to human-grown plants and/or are so abundant that they cause damage to human-created landscapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Gap Ranch Biological Resource Evaluation
    RED GAP RANCH BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE EVALUATION Prepared for: Southwest Ground-water Consultants, Inc. Prepared by: WestLand Resources, Inc. Date: February 14, 2014 Project No.: 1822.01 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................ 1 2. EXISTING ENVIRONMENT AND BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ................................................... 2 2.1. Approach ...................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2. Physical Environment ................................................................................................................... 2 2.3. Biological Environment and Resources ....................................................................................... 3 3. SCREENING ANALYSIS FOR SPECIES OF CONCERN ................................................................ 5 3.1. Approach ...................................................................................................................................... 5 3.2. Screening Analysis Results .......................................................................................................... 7 3.2.1. USFWS-listed Species ...................................................................................................... 7 3.2.2. USFS Coconino National Forest Sensitive Species ........................................................ 15 3.2.3. USFS Management Indicator Species ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kanab Ambersnail (Oxyloma Kanabense)
    TOC Page | 88 KANAB AMBERSNAIL (OXYLOMA KANABENSE) Navajo/Federal Statuses: NESL G4 / listed endangered 17 APR 1992 (57FR:13657). Distribution: Only two populations known: 1) near Kanab in Kane County, UT; 2) at Vasey's Paradise in Grand Canyon National Park (75.3 km downstream of Glen Canyon Dam). Potential is likely restricted to western Navajo Nation; including tributaries of Colorado and Little Colorado Rivers, springs on Echo Cliffs, and creeks north and west of Navajo Mountain. Habitat: Restricted to perennially wet soil surfaces or shallow standing water and decaying plant matter associated with springs and seep-fed marshes near sandstone or limestone cliffs. Vegetative cover is necessary; cattails, monkeyflower, or watercress are present at the two known locations, but wetland grasses and sedges may suffice. Similar Species: other Succineid snails; see Pilsbry, 1948. Phenology: m.MAR-l.MAR: emergence from winter dormancy by previous year’s young e.APR-e.JUL: maturation e.JUL-l.AUG: peak reproduction l.AUG-l.SEP: growth of young, die-off of adults >l.SEP: growth of young, winter dormancy Survey Method: Pedestrian surveys within suitable habitat examining on and under wetland vegetation for live or dead snails. Federal permit required for collection. Suggested reference: Spamer and Bogan, in press. Avoidance: No surface disturbance year-round within 60 m of occupied habitat; no alteration of water quantity and chemistry. References: Pilsbry, H.A. 1948. Land mollusca of North America (North of Mexico). Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Monographs II, No.3. (description, p.797) Spamer, E.E. and A.E. Bogan. in press.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Snails and Slugs (Gastropoda: Caenogastropoda and Pulmonata) of Two National Parks Along the Potomac River Near Washington, District of Columbia
    Banisteria, Number 43, pages 3-20 © 2014 Virginia Natural History Society Land Snails and Slugs (Gastropoda: Caenogastropoda and Pulmonata) of Two National Parks along the Potomac River near Washington, District of Columbia Brent W. Steury U.S. National Park Service 700 George Washington Memorial Parkway Turkey Run Park Headquarters McLean, Virginia 22101 Timothy A. Pearce Carnegie Museum of Natural History 4400 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213-4080 ABSTRACT The land snails and slugs (Gastropoda: Caenogastropoda and Pulmonata) of two national parks along the Potomac River in Washington DC, Maryland, and Virginia were surveyed in 2010 and 2011. A total of 64 species was documented accounting for 60 new county or District records. Paralaoma servilis (Shuttleworth) and Zonitoides nitidus (Müller) are recorded for the first time from Virginia and Euconulus polygyratus (Pilsbry) is confirmed from the state. Previously unreported growth forms of Punctum smithi Morrison and Stenotrema barbatum (Clapp) are described. Key words: District of Columbia, Euconulus polygyratus, Gastropoda, land snails, Maryland, national park, Paralaoma servilis, Punctum smithi, Stenotrema barbatum, Virginia, Zonitoides nitidus. INTRODUCTION Although county-level distributions of native land gastropods have been published for the eastern United Land snails and slugs (Gastropoda: Caeno- States (Hubricht, 1985), and for the District of gastropoda and Pulmonata) represent a large portion of Columbia and Maryland (Grimm, 1971a), and Virginia the terrestrial invertebrate fauna with estimates ranging (Beetle, 1973), no published records exist specific to between 30,000 and 35,000 species worldwide (Solem, the areas inventoried during this study, which covered 1984), including at least 523 native taxa in the eastern select national park sites along the Potomac River in United States (Hubricht, 1985).
    [Show full text]