Architecture Program Report Woodbury University
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ARCHITECTURE PROGRAM REPORT WOODBURY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE SEPTEMBER 2007 Yong Tang, 1st year, Instructor: V. Liptak ARCHITECTURE PROGRAM REPORT BACHELOR OF ARCHITECTURE WOODBURY UNIVERSITY DR. KENNETH R. NIELSEN, PRESIDENT DR. DAVID ROSEN, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, ACADEMIC AFFAIRS SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE NORMAN MILLAR, DIRECTOR CATHERINE HERBST, ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, SAN DIEGO INGALILL WAHLROOS-RITTER, ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, BURBANK/LA TED SMITH, JONATHAN SEGAL, CO-DIRECTORS, M.ARCH.RED PAULETTE SINGLEY, PROGRAM HEAD, HISTORY AND THEORY DEBRA ABEL, ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR, SAN DIEGO BURBANK/LA 7500 Glenoaks Boulevard, Burbank/LA, CA 91510 818.252.5121 SAN DIEGO 1060 Eighth Avenue, San Diego, CA 92101 619.235.2900 -2- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Woodbury University School of Architecture thanks President Kenneth Nielsen and the many members of the university community who contributed to this report. In particular we acknowledge the contributions of Nedra Peterson, Director of Library Services, Celeastia (Cleo) Williams, Director of the Registrar’s Office and Financial Aid, Tamara Blok, Registrar, Richard Nordin, Vice President of University Advancement, Kenneth Jones, Vice President of Finance and Administration, Don St. Clair, Vice President of Enrollment Services and University Marketing, Steve Dyer, Vice President of Information Technology and Planning, and Phyllis Cremer, Associate Vice President of Student Development. We also thank the many staff members who work in these offices. We gratefully acknowledge the moral and intellectual support of David Rosen, Senior Vice President of Academic Affairs. Thank you for your ongoing leadership in helping us to establish and realize our vision for the School of Architecture. Many members of our faculty contributed directly to this report; we thank you for your time and thoughtful assessments. With gratitude we acknowledge all of the students and faculty who contributed through their discussions, their surveys, their words of support and encouragement, and, of course, their outstanding work. Many thanks to our alumni, who make us look good in the practicing architecture community of Southern California and beyond. Special thanks to Galina Kraus and Terry La Source for assembling, organizing and formatting data for the report, all in the midst of the normal daily hubbub of students and phone calls at the Faculty Center. And we were delighted to have discovered the precise and speedy expertise of Institutional Researcher Nathan Garrett. Finally, this report would not exist without the extra-ordinary work of two people in particular. Kris Christ, terminally optimistic administrative coordinator, demonstrated unflappable patience and good humor with the many contributors to the report and superb organizational skills in coordinating its assembly. Hadley Arnold, wordsmith and moral compass of the Architecture Faculty, painstakingly listened, and then eloquently represented the collective voice of the school in her exhaustive writing for this report. We are indebted to you both for your personal sacrifice right up to the end in making it happen. In gratitude for their generous support of the architecture program, we dedicate this report to Julius Shulman and to the Raymond and Maxine Frankel family. — Norman Millar, Director, Woodbury School of Architecture -3- -4- 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE PROGRAM 8 1.1 History and Description of the Institution 9 1.2 Institutional Mission (Adopted 2006) 12 1.3 Program History 13 1.4 Program Mission 16 1.5 Program Self-Assessment 16 2 PROGRESS SINCE THE PREVIOUS SITE VISIT 26 2.1 Summary of Responses to the Team Findings 26 2.1.1 2002 VTR Conditions “Not Met” 26 2.1.2 2002 VTR “Causes of Concern” 30 2.2 Summary of Responses to Changes in the NAAB Condition 34 2.2.1 Introduction to the Program 34 2.2.2 Condition 3.5 Studio Culture 35 2.2.3 Condition 3.10 Financial Resources 35 2.2.4 Condition 3.13 Student Performance Criteria 35 3 THE THIRTEEN CONDITIONS OF ACCREDITATION 38 3.1 Program Response to the NAAB Perspectives 38 3.1.1 Architectural Education and the Academic Context 38 3.1.2 Architectural Education and the Students 49 3.1.3 Architectural Education and Registration 57 3.1.4 Architectural Education and the Profession 59 3.1.5 Architectural Education and Society 63 3.2 Program Self-Assessment Procedures 68 3.3 Public Information 72 3.4 Social Equity 73 3.5 Studio Culture 78 3.6 Human Resources 79 3.7 Human Resource Development 84 3.8 Physical Resources 91 3.9 Information Resources 97 3.10 Financial Resources 112 3.11 Administrative Structure 120 3.12 Professional Degrees 124 3.13 Student Performance Criteria 133 4 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 140 4.1 Student Progress Evaluation Procedures 140 4.2 Studio Culture Policy 150 4.3 Course Descriptions 155 4.4 Faculty Resumes 205 4.5 Visiting Team Report from the Previous Visit 341 4.6 Annual Reports 371 4.6.1 2003 Woodbury Annual Report 371 4.6.2 2004 Woodbury Annual Report 381 4.6.3 2005 Woodbury Annual Report 390 4.6.4 2006 Woodbury Annual Report 400 4.6.5 NAAB Statistical Reports 409 4.6.6 FTE Administrative Positions 2.4 418 -5- 4.6.7 FTE Administrative Positions 3 420 4.6.8 NAAB Response to Woodbury University Annual Reports 421 5 APPENDICES 428 5.1 Librarian’s Appendices 428 5.2 Lectures, Exhibits, Grants 442 5.3 Building Plans 450 5.4 WASC 462 5.5 Shop List 466 5.6 Annual Budgets 470 5.7 Architecture Faculty Meeting Minutes 2006-07 475 5.8 Faculty Personnel Handbook, Section C 510 5.9 Grading Study 549 5.10 Common Data Set 554 5.11 Student and Alumni Surveys-Spring 2007 (Enclosed separately) 615 -6- 1 INTRODUCTION TO PROGRAM 2007 End of Year Student Exhibition, Hollywood CCRD -7- 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE PROGRAM Woodbury School of Architecture: Who We Are With facilities located in Burbank/Los Angeles, Hollywood and San Diego, Woodbury School of Architecture offers a five-year, nationally accredited, professional Bachelor of Architecture degree, and a one-year Master of Architecture degree in Real Estate Development. Southern California and its megalopolis, stretching from Los Angeles through San Diego to Tijuana, present a vital and diverse context within which to examine architecture, urbanism, culture, and the natural environment. The School sees its student population, which reflects the region’s vitality and diversity, as its greatest asset. Woodbury University’s School of Architecture is committed to investigating and extending the social, urban, economic, environmental, technological, and formal dimensions of architecture. The School emphasizes, analyzes, and debates the role of the architect/citizen as cultural communicator and builder responsive to societal and environmental challenges. We integrate into the design curriculum recent innovations in computer aided design, multi-media, and sustainable technologies. We provide students with a strong skill base, rich interdisciplinary dialog, and generous support resources. We are an intensely urban school that at the same time recognizes and explores its deep embeddedness in the surrounding landscapes. We focus acutely on the distinct problems and opportunities of socially, culturally, and environmentally sustainable space-making in Los Angeles, San Diego, and Southern California. At the same time, we offer extensive opportunities for international study in Latin America, Asia, and Europe. We maintain a critical, inventive, resourceful, accomplished, passionate, practice-based, and exceptionally dedicated faculty representing diverse interests and strengths. We train our students, who are ethnically, economically, and academically diverse, as articulate critical thinkers and highly capable practitioners, confident in local as well as global discourse. Issues of sustainability, responsible advocacy, and appropriate and innovative use of materials and manufacturing processes are raised throughout the program, and an entrepreneurial spirit of agility and risk-taking is a hallmark of our faculty’s approach. Director Norman Millar and the faculty of the School of Architecture are committed to delivering on the school’s mission: WOODBURY : ARCHITECTURE : TRANSFORMS We believe in architectural education as transformative. We believe in the radical possibilities of architecture’s relevance, socially, environmentally, and formally. We are architects and critical thinkers who produce other architects and critical thinkers. Woodbury’s students, faculty, and graduates are committed to architecture that is: • intelligent – articulates a critical position; • effective – addresses the challenges of contemporary life; and • beautiful – fully vested in the transformative power of beauty. Woodbury students distinguish themselves in local, regional, and national design competitions and scholarship awards; are valued in the workplace; and often go on to elite graduate schools. Woodbury School of Architecture delivers a strong and effective education that has garnered much regional attention and is poised to gain national prominence. Under Director Norman Millar’s leadership, enrollment in the school has doubled since 2000. Director’s Vision The School of Architecture is poised to emerge as a strong international leader in architectural education. Our vision for the next five-year cycle for the school is to solidify our commitment to architecture and urbanism that is critically effective, by focusing on issue-oriented problems, challenges and opportunities within the contested landscapes of the American West. Specifically theses include: • The influences associated