DOCSLIB.ORG

Halibut Donated to Four Communities in Need

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Fall 2015 Kawerak, Inc. Halibut Donated to Four Communities in Need By Planning awerak received and dis- donated by the SeaShare group to the four communities that are Bering Air, Erickson Helicopters, tributed 10,000 lbs. of out of Bainbridge, WA. SeaShare heavily reliant upon walrus meat Ravn Alaska, and Lynden Trans- K halibut on July 29. It was exists to help food banks across and other marine mammal port, Inc. for the donation of the the nation fill homes with seafood resources to fill their freezers. The air freight for 200 boxes of frozen from the Pacific Northwest. Based residents of Diomede, Gambell, halibut and forklift services to on an average 4-ounce portion, Savoonga and Wales received the move pallets for shipment. We SeaShare has donated more than boxes of frozen halibut to supple- give special recognition to the U.S. 200 million servings of seafood in ment their far below normal levels Coast Guard for flying the halibut the past 20 years, much of it com- of nutritional sustenance currently up to Nome on their C130. ing from Alaska with its great net- secured for the year. The low har- Melanie Bahnke, President of work of donors. The halibut proc- vest of walrus is due to the chang- Kawerak notes, “This was a great essing for this shipment was ing Bering Sea ice and wind condi- partnership between SeaShare, donated by many generous Alaska tions in recent years. The Bering the U.S. Coast Guard, Bering Air, seafood companies, including Sea ice is normally considered one Erickson Helicopters, Ravn Ocean Beauty Seafoods and North of the primary breeding and haul Alaska, Lynden Transport, Inc., Pacific Seafoods in Kodiak. out area for walrus. Vera Metcalf the State of Alaska, Kawerak, Earlier this year, several tribes says, “Although the donation is Inc., the Eskimo Walrus Commis- contacted the Eskimo Walrus good news, it’s only a temporary sion, the Native Village of Commission for technical assis- solution as climate change makes Diomede, the Native Village of tance in declaring a local harvest hunting more difficult.” Gambell, the Native Village of disaster and requested outside It was great to partner with local Savoonga and the Native Village Jeremy Kazingnuk (Bubba), assistance. Kawerak was then airline companies to save on the of Wales to overcome several from Diomede helping his approached by the State of Alaska, cost of moving the 10,000 lbs. of logistical issues to bring the most grand-father Dennis Soolook, Governor Walker’s office, to halibut after it arrived in Nome. vital and basic resource to four Sr. bring fish home receive and distribute the halibut Kawerak and the tribes recognize: communities in the Bering Strait.” " Just when I cooked the last of our walrus from our freezer, we received the donation of halibut, which filled our freezer. We are so PAID grateful and thankful PERMIT #456 PERMIT for the fish and PRESRT STD PRESRT US POSTAGE US ANCHORAGE, AK ANCHORAGE, express our thanks over and over." A quote from a Carol Piscoya,Community Services resident of Gambell Vice President, with Coast Guard Cap- tain Mark Morin, Commanding Officer of the Air Station in Kodiak. 5231 phone 5231 - Kawerak, Inc. Kawerak, 948 Box PO 99762 AK Nome, (907)443 www.kawerak.org Kawerak Newsletter Kawerak Kawerak Newsletter (formerly named Uqaaqtuaq News) is an informational newsletter produced by Kawerak with contributions from UAF Northwest Campus and other partner agencies. Articles and photos can be sent to [email protected] or call (907)443-4345. Ublaakun suli translated in the Inupiaq language means: Tomorrow again! All smiles in Savoonga as the donated iviisa (halibut) is distributed Quyanna! Visit our website at www.kawerak.org. - Trent Noongwook and Jaylene Miklahook receiving their share. Fall 2015 Kawerak, Inc. Nome Archaeology Camp, By the 11 Campers and 4 Camp Sponsors (listed below) etween July 19-26 eleven students Archaeology-What We Learned word of mouth. Today we still “reading the Earth” and discover- from Savoonga, Buckland, Kotzebue, Hunting techniques and sub- share stories orally, but also ing hard evidence of a humun- B Selawik, Nome, Girdwood, Fairbanks, sistence activities. record them by transcription or gous storm about 2,000 years and Anchorage explored Northwest Alaska’s What people lived in: tents recording them with tape record- ago. This storm coincided with a rich cultural heritage from a base camp near and semi-subterranean ers. We discovered that it is our story originating from around responsibility as youth to pass on that same time telling of a fero- Salmon Lake, just outside of Nome. From houses. our stories to others. cious storm destroying villages there, campers gained experience in archaeo- How to tell prehistoric and historic apart: prehistoric is Why do we record stories? across Alaska. We thought it was logical survey and GPS mapping, recorded oral We record stories so we can learn interesting that stories can com- histories with local elders, launched field trips before writing, historic is after. from our past so we don’t repeat plement and support scientific to study museum curation at the Carrie M. Archaeological terms and mistakes. evidence and that the two tradi- McLain Memorial Museum, visited the historic methods Morals tions can coincide. Pilgrim Hot Springs, and worked together as a Morals are lessons one might Museums Marked archaeological sites take away from stories. There are group to take care of daily camp chores. with a GPS. We keep artifacts in muse- many different types of morals. ums to respect the spirit of In the box to the right students share Took soil samples with a soil For example, one moral that is the items. some of what they learned! probe. often used in stories told by our Not every community has a Measured artifacts with a ancestors is to pay due respect to museum. Created by the 11 campers: Andrew Ken- tape measure. all things. Another moral used in Types of museums: 1) State, nedy, Harding Black, Sam Cross, Ben Learned about radiocarbon a story told by Guy Martin is that world, and local museums; dating. Cross, Jacob Weber, Martin Hadley, you should not steal. 2) Cultural Center, Heritage Sites we visited: Anna Warnock, Emma Frankevich, Shamanism Center; and 3) Repository Caribou drive line Shamanism is also a big part of (storage). Sara Toolie, Jennifer Smith, and cultural storytelling, but is the Tent rings Work we do at museums: 1) Daphne Stein in partnership with the one subject that we heard the Village site Catalog artifacts; 2) Connect least about. A shaman can be Nome Culture Camp sponsors: Alaska Pilgrim Hot Springs with Native Elders; 3) Ar- “magical,” “mystical,” and Geographic, National Park Service, Possible Careers: chaeological research; 4) “unknown.” Shamans can be Cultural Anthropologist, Archae- Compare/contrast different Kawerak, Carrie M. McLain Memorial good or bad, but they are rarely ological Educator, Tour Guide, cultures; and 5) Help visitors. Museum & Bering Straits Native Corp. both. According to stories we Museum Director, Paid Intern- Artifacts are old and fragile heard from elders, shamans were ships, Fish Biologist, Artist, so we should be careful powerful individuals. Some peo- Learn More! Photographer, Native Corpora- around displays. ple also call shamans “medicine Are you interested in hearing more about tion Executive, Curator, Ecolo- How do museums collect ar- gist, Pilot, and Interpretive people”. the 2015 Nome Archaeology Camp or tifacts? 1) Donations; 2) Ar- Ranger. Oral History and Science would you like to participate in future chaeological sites; 3) Travel- Oral History: Stories from the One fascinating aspect of oral ing exhibits; and 4) Many ar- camps? Contact Hannah Atkinson at past, morals for the future. history we learned about was the tifacts from Northwest Arctic [email protected], 907-442-8342 How do we share stories? intersection of science and tradi- region are kept in different or visit facebook.com/nomearchaeology For thousands of years people in tional stories. One example Guy states and countries. to stay informed! Alaska passed down stories by Martin spoke of was of geologists Left to right standing: Andrew Kennedy, Harding Black, Andrew Tremayne, Samuel Cross, Ben Cross, Jacob Weber, Martin Hadley, Hannah Brewster, Anna Warnock, Emma Frankevich, Matt Ganley, Sara Toolie, Hannah Atkinson, Jack Omelik, Jennifer Smith. Left to right kneeling: Jeff Rasic, Daphne Stein, and Jillian Richie. Kawerak Newsletter Page 2 Fall 2015 Kawerak, Inc. Scrap Metal Recycling Project KNEWS Program By Lucy Olanna, Brevig Mission IGAP Coordinator and Reuben Adams, IGAP Assistant By Katie Bourdon, Workforce Development Director awerak’s Native Employment Work Ser- vices (KNEWS) has recently hired Angela K (Toolie) Hukill as the Job Development Specialist. Angela was raised in Savoonga. She will be working with our clients to find volunteer place- ments at local work sites to earn their Alaska Temporary Assistance Program (ATAP) benefits. She recently traveled to Stebbins, Savoonga, and Shaktoolik to meet with clients and worksites. Angela enjoys traveling and working with people. Brevig Mission IGAP Laborers, BrandonTocktoo and David M. Olanna prepping She is outgoing, friendly, and has a positive atti- scrap metal for shipment and a flat of the materials after they arrived in Nome. tude. Welcome Angela! School has started, and this is a great place for ucy Olanna and Reuben Adams This new small business, an L.L.C. owned by volunteer opportunities. Clients may be interested from the Native Village of Brevig John Odden, Marc Lee, and Larry Overbay, in learning more about preparing and serving food, L Mission, spearheaded the effort is getting started on stock-piling scrap metal assisting a coach with sports activities, monitoring through the EPA IGAP (Environmental Pro- that eventually will be shipped out for recy- gym safety during evening gym, helping teach tection Agency Indian General Assistance cling.
Recommended publications
  • United States District Court for the District of Columbia

    United States District Court for the District of Columbia

    Case 1:10-cv-02076-EGS Document 35 Filed 06/10/11 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) NORTHERN AIR CARGO, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, ) Civil Action No. 10-2076 (EGS) ) Defendant, ) ) and ) ) PENINSULA AIRWAYS, INC., ) ) Defendant-Intervenor. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION On December 3, 2010, the United States Postal Service (the “Postal Service”) granted an equitable tender of nonpriority mainline bypass mail to Peninsula Airways, Inc. (“PenAir”) on five mainline routes in rural Alaska pursuant to 39 U.S.C. § 5402(g)(5)(c) (“§ 5402(g)(5)(C)”). This equitable tender is now being challenged by three mainline carriers – Northern Air Cargo (“NAC”), Tatonduk Outfitters Ltd d/b/a Everts Air Cargo (“Everts”), and Lynden Air Cargo LLC (“Lynden”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”). Specifically, plaintiffs challenge the Postal Service’s purportedly ultra vires determination that PenAir had satisfied the “Prior Service and Capacity Requirement” of 39 U.S.C. § 5402(g)(1)(A)(iv)(II) (“§ 5402(g)(1)(A)(iv)(II)”) as of Case 1:10-cv-02076-EGS Document 35 Filed 06/10/11 Page 2 of 25 December 3, 2010.1 Plaintiffs seek both declaratory and injunctive relief. See generally Compl. Pending before the Court is plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, as well as the cross-motions for summary judgment filed by Defendant Postal Service and Defendant-Intervenor PenAir (collectively, “defendants”). Upon consideration of the motions, the responses and replies thereto, the applicable law, the entire record, and for the following reasons, the Court hereby DENIES plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and GRANTS defendants’ cross-motions for summary judgment.
  • INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE on AIR LAW (Montréal, 20 April to 2

    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE on AIR LAW (Montréal, 20 April to 2

    DCCD Doc No. 28 28/4/09 (English only) INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AIR LAW (Montréal, 20 April to 2 May 2009) CONVENTION ON COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGE CAUSED BY AIRCRAFT TO THIRD PARTIES AND CONVENTION ON COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGE TO THIRD PARTIES, RESULTING FROM ACTS OF UNLAWFUL INTERFERENCE INVOLVING AIRCRAFT (Presented by the Air Crash Victims Families Group) 1. INTRODUCTION – SUPPLEMENTAL AND OTHER COMPENSATIONS 1.1 The apocalyptic terrorist attack by the means of four hi-jacked planes committed against the World Trade Center in New York, NY , the Pentagon in Arlington, VA and the aborted flight ending in a crash in the rural area in Shankville, PA ON September 11th, 2001 is the only real time example that triggered this proposed Convention on Compensation for Damage to Third Parties from Acts of Unlawful Interference Involving Aircraft. 1.2 It is therefore important to look towards the post incident resolution of this tragedy in order to adequately and pro actively complete ONE new General Risk Convention (including compensation for ALL catastrophic damages) for the twenty first century. 2. DISCUSSION 2.1 Immediately after September 11th, 2001 – the Government and Congress met with all affected and interested parties resulting in the “Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act” (Public Law 107-42-Sept. 22,2001). 2.2 This Law provided the basis for Rules and Regulations for: a) Airline Stabilization; b) Aviation Insurance; c) Tax Provisions; d) Victims Compensation; and e) Air Transportation Safety. DCCD Doc No. 28 - 2 - 2.3 The Airline Stabilization Act created the legislative vehicle needed to reimburse the air transport industry for their losses of income as a result of the flight interruption due to the 911 attack.
  • Chapter Iv Regionals/Commuters

    Chapter Iv Regionals/Commuters

    CHAPTER IV REGIONALS/COMMUTERS For purposes of the Federal Aviation REVIEW OF 20032 Administration (FAA) forecasts, air carriers that are included as part of the regional/commuter airline industry meet three criteria. First, a The results for the regional/commuter industry for regional/commuter carrier flies a majority of their 2003 reflect the continuation of a trend that started available seat miles (ASMs) using aircraft having with the events of September 11th and have been 70 seats or less. Secondly, the service provided by drawn out by the Iraq War and Severe Acute these carriers is primarily regularly scheduled Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). These “shocks” to passenger service. Thirdly, the primary mission of the system have led to the large air carriers posting the carrier is to provide connecting service for its losses in passengers for 3 years running. The code-share partners. losses often reflect diversions in traffic to the regional/commuter carriers. These carriers During 2003, 75 reporting regional/commuter recorded double-digit growth in both capacity and airlines met this definition. Monthly traffic data for traffic for the second time in as many years. History 10 of these carriers was compiled from the has demonstrated that the regional/commuter Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Form 41 industry endures periods of uncertainty better than and T-100 filings. Traffic for the remaining the larger air carriers. During the oil embargo of 65 carriers was compiled solely from T-100 filings. 1 1973, the recession in 1990, and the Gulf War in Prior to fiscal year 2003, 10 regionals/commuters 1991, the regional/commuter industry consistently reported on DOT Form 41 while 65 smaller outperformed the larger air carriers.
  • Airlines Codes

    Airlines Codes

    Airlines codes Sorted by Airlines Sorted by Code Airline Code Airline Code Aces VX Deutsche Bahn AG 2A Action Airlines XQ Aerocondor Trans Aereos 2B Acvilla Air WZ Denim Air 2D ADA Air ZY Ireland Airways 2E Adria Airways JP Frontier Flying Service 2F Aea International Pte 7X Debonair Airways 2G AER Lingus Limited EI European Airlines 2H Aero Asia International E4 Air Burkina 2J Aero California JR Kitty Hawk Airlines Inc 2K Aero Continente N6 Karlog Air 2L Aero Costa Rica Acori ML Moldavian Airlines 2M Aero Lineas Sosa P4 Haiti Aviation 2N Aero Lloyd Flugreisen YP Air Philippines Corp 2P Aero Service 5R Millenium Air Corp 2Q Aero Services Executive W4 Island Express 2S Aero Zambia Z9 Canada Three Thousand 2T Aerocaribe QA Western Pacific Air 2U Aerocondor Trans Aereos 2B Amtrak 2V Aeroejecutivo SA de CV SX Pacific Midland Airlines 2W Aeroflot Russian SU Helenair Corporation Ltd 2Y Aeroleasing SA FP Changan Airlines 2Z Aeroline Gmbh 7E Mafira Air 3A Aerolineas Argentinas AR Avior 3B Aerolineas Dominicanas YU Corporate Express Airline 3C Aerolineas Internacional N2 Palair Macedonian Air 3D Aerolineas Paraguayas A8 Northwestern Air Lease 3E Aerolineas Santo Domingo EX Air Inuit Ltd 3H Aeromar Airlines VW Air Alliance 3J Aeromexico AM Tatonduk Flying Service 3K Aeromexpress QO Gulfstream International 3M Aeronautica de Cancun RE Air Urga 3N Aeroperlas WL Georgian Airlines 3P Aeroperu PL China Yunnan Airlines 3Q Aeropostal Alas VH Avia Air Nv 3R Aerorepublica P5 Shuswap Air 3S Aerosanta Airlines UJ Turan Air Airline Company 3T Aeroservicios
  • NACC Contact List July 2015 Update

    NACC Contact List July 2015 Update

    ID POC Name POC Email Office Cell Filer Other Comments ABS Jets (Czech Republic) ABS Michal Pazourek (Chf Disp) [email protected] +420 220 111 388 + 420 602 205 (LKPRABPX & LKPRABY) [email protected] 852 ABX Air ABX Alain Terzakis [email protected] 937-366-2464 937-655-0703 (800) 736-3973 x62450 KILNABXD Ron Spanbauer [email protected] 937-366-2435 (937) 366-2450 24hr. AeroMexico AMX Raul Aguirre (FPF) [email protected] 011 (5255) 9132-5500 (281) 233-3406 Files thru HP/EDS Air Berlin BER Recep Bayindir [email protected] 49-30-3434-3705 EDDTBERA [email protected] AirBridgeCargo Airlines ABW Dmitry Levushkin [email protected] Chief Flight Dispatcher 7 8422 590370 Also see Volga-Dnepr Airlines Volga-Dnepr Airlines 7 8422 590067 (VDA) Air Canada ACA Richard Steele (Mgr Flt Supt) [email protected] 905 861 7572 647 328-3895 905 861 7528 CYYZACAW thru LIDO Rod Stone [email protected] 905 861 7570 Air China CCA Weston Li (Mgr. American Ops) [email protected] 604-233-1682 778-883-3315 Zhang Yuenian [email protected] Air Europa AEA Bernardo Salleras [email protected] Flight Ops [email protected] 34 971 178 281 (Ops Mgr) Air France AFR Thierry Vuillaume Thierry Vuillaume <[email protected]> +33 (0)1 41 56 78 65 LFPGAFRN Air India AIC Puneet Kataria [email protected] 718-632-0125 917-9811807 + 91-22-66858028 KJFKAICO [email protected] 718-632-0162direct Use SABRE for flights Files thru HP/EDS arriving/departing USA Air New Zealand
  • The Evolution of U.S. Commercial Domestic Aircraft Operations from 1991 to 2010

    The Evolution of U.S. Commercial Domestic Aircraft Operations from 1991 to 2010

    THE EVOLUTION OF U.S. COMMERCIAL DOMESTIC AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS FROM 1991 TO 2010 by MASSACHUSETTS INSTME OF TECHNOLOGY ALEXANDER ANDREW WULZ UL02 1 B.S., Aerospace Engineering University of Notre Dame (2008) Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics in PartialFulfillment of the Requirementsfor the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2012 0 2012 Alexander Andrew Wulz. All rights reserved. .The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author ..................................................................... .. ...................... Department of Aeronautr and Astronautics n n May 11, 2012 Certified by ............................................................................ Peter P. Belobaba Principle Research Scientist of Aeronautics and Astronautics / Thesis Supervisor A ccepted by ................................................................... Eytan H. Modiano Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair, Graduate Program Committee 1 PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 THE EVOLUTION OF U.S. COMMERCIAL DOMESTIC AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS FROM 1991 TO 2010 by ALEXANDER ANDREW WULZ Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics on May 11, 2012 in PartialFulfillment of the Requirementsfor the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS ABSTRACT The main objective of this thesis is to explore the evolution of U.S. commercial domestic aircraft operations from 1991 to 2010 and describe the implications for future U.S. commercial domestic fleets. Using data collected from the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, we analyze 110 different aircraft types from 145 airlines operating U.S. commercial domestic service between 1991 and 2010. We classify the aircraft analyzed into four categories: turboprop, regional jet, narrow-body, and wide-body.
  • United States Department of Transportation FY 2020 Annual Modal Research Plans Cover Page

    United States Department of Transportation FY 2020 Annual Modal Research Plans Cover Page

    United States Department of Transportation FY 2020 Annual Modal Research Plans Cover Page Federal Aviation Administration February 14, 2020 Submitted by: Shelley Yak William J. Hughes Technical Center Director FAA Research Portfolio Manager Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... i Chapter 1. Introduction/Agency-Wide Research Approach ......................................................................................... 1 Research Portfolio Information ................................................................................................................................ 2 Acquisition/Assistance .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Technology Transfer (T2) .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Evaluation/Performance Measurement ................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 2. High Priority Project Descriptions ............................................................................................................... 6 New High Priority Projects for FY 2020 ..................................................................................................................... 6 High Priority Projects
  • St. Mary's Airport Planning and Rsa Practicability Study

    St. Mary's Airport Planning and Rsa Practicability Study

    ST. MARY’S AIRPORT PLANNING AND RSA PRACTICABILITY STUDY Project Number Z605630000 AIP Number 3-02-0017-XXX-201X AVIATION ACTIVITY FORECAST Prepared For: State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Prepared By: HDL Engineering Consultants, LLC 3335 Arctic Boulevard Anchorage, Alaska 99503 August 2018 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Population ........................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Demographic Characteristics ..................................................................... 4 3.0 Geographic Attributes ........................................................................................ 4 3.1 Air Freight Hub ........................................................................................... 5 3.2 River Freight Hub ....................................................................................... 7 4.0 Economic Characteristics.................................................................................. 7 5.0 Aviation Activity ................................................................................................. 8 6.0 Aircraft Operations ............................................................................................. 9 7.0 Passenger Enplanements ................................................................................ 11 8.0 Air Cargo ..........................................................................................................
  • The Nine Major US Airlines Are on Track to Hire Nearly

    The Nine Major US Airlines Are on Track to Hire Nearly

    ` For Immediate Release Contact: Laura Arden Director of Sales and Marketing, FAPA.aero 1-800-JET-JOBS (538-5627) Ext. 11 | Direct: (808) 799-9350 Email: [email protected] FAPA Pilot Job Fair & Future Pilot Forum Coming to Chicago Saturday, September 30, 2017 Hyatt Regency O’Hare “The nine major U.S. airlines Certain sectors of the aviation industry are experiencing a significant are on track to hire nearly shortage of qualified pilots, a scarcity of men and women to fly an 5,000 pilots in 2017. A increasingly large fleet of jets around the world, a gap that needs to recent Boeing Company be filled in the next 20 years. forecast says the industry needs nearly 617,000 pilots FAPA’s Pilot Job Fair in Chicago on Saturday, September 30, from worldwide thru 2036.” 9 AM – 12 PM will be held at the Hyatt Regency O’Hare. The event is FREE to all pilots. This pilot job fair is a regional and Part 135 only event. It will bring recruiters and active pilots together. Airlines recruiting are Piedmont Airlines, Envoy Air, Air Wisconsin, Compass Airlines, Everts Air Cargo, ExpressJet, Gama Aviation, GoJet Airlines, Mesa Airlines, Republic Airline, SkyWest Airlines, and US Customs and Border Protection/Air & Marine Operations. Qualified pilots should register for free at www.FAPA.aero/Jobs. FAPA (Future and Active Pilot Advisors), the pilot career consulting company and its partners Piedmont Airlines and Envoy Air, are ‘Building the Pilot Pipeline’ TM by inviting career changers and aspiring pilots of all ages – career changers, students and their families, separating military personnel, and future pilots of all backgrounds – to FAPA Future Pilot Forums to learn about the pathways to a professional pilot career.
  • Major and National Carriers Scheduled Domestic Passenger Service Onboard Domestic Database Report - Time Series Format

    Major and National Carriers Scheduled Domestic Passenger Service Onboard Domestic Database Report - Time Series Format

    Major and National Carriers Scheduled Domestic Passenger Service Onboard Domestic Database Report - Time Series Format Car C DataItem 2015 01 2015 02 2015 03 2015 04 2015 05 2015 06 2015 07 2015 08 2015 09 2015 10 2015 11 2015 12 Carrier/Flag ---- - ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ 9E F Onboard Pax 677,827 637,125 848,781 804,610 800,335 831,440 844,938 837,059 757,532 867,794 784,938 801,542 Endeavor Air Inc. AA F Onboard Pax 5,162,168 4,703,073 5,749,917 5,725,185 5,744,058 5,983,555 11,124,122 10,676,947 9,478,775 10,287,429 9,578,483 9,808,502 American Airlines Inc. AS F Onboard Pax 1,573,683 1,509,324 1,853,281 1,749,620 1,860,887 1,960,857 2,110,863 2,118,539 1,771,463 1,795,651 1,743,621 1,846,272 Alaska Airlines Inc. B6 F Onboard Pax 2,161,966 2,024,206 2,512,376 2,434,074 2,478,873 2,461,814 2,654,698 2,617,179 2,198,070 2,416,652 2,396,879 2,560,509 Jet Blue CP F Onboard Pax 290,726 275,383 337,888 329,794 361,787 401,392 419,738 420,747 381,350 442,352 449,765 481,883 Compass Airlines DL F Onboard Pax 7,796,384 7,651,300 9,939,622 9,575,049 10,069,578 10,505,128 10,929,107 10,700,033 9,350,630 10,216,041 9,497,495 9,165,951 Delta Air Lines Inc.
  • 18 June, 2018 Page 1 TABLE 1. Summary of Aircraft Departures And

    18 June, 2018 Page 1 TABLE 1. Summary of Aircraft Departures And

    TABLE 1. Summary of Aircraft Departures and Enplaned Passengers, Freight, and Mail by Carrier Group, Air Carrier, and Type of Service: 2017 ( Major carriers ) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aircraft Departures Enplaned revenue-tones Carrier Group Service Total Enplaned by air carrier performed Scheduled passengers Freight Mail -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ALASKA AIRLINES INC. Scheduled 195347 192670 25078528 49925.43 24313.87 Nonscheduled 450 0 34455 3.38 0.00 All services 195797 192670 25112983 49928.81 24313.87 ALLEGIANT AIR Scheduled 87234 87234 12234630 0.00 0.00 Nonscheduled 995 0 122010 0.00 0.00 All services 88229 87234 12356640 0.00 0.00 AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. Scheduled 983417 996962 130643223 322204.34 113435.83 Nonscheduled 494 0 58008 0.00 0.00 All services 983911 996962 130701231 322204.34 113435.83 ATLAS AIR INC. Nonscheduled 21524 0 97516 982466.74 0.00 DELTA AIR LINES INC. Scheduled 989388 996083 132936316 257960.65 101269.63 Nonscheduled 5880 0 228860 0.00 0.00 All services 995268 996083 133165176 257960.65 101269.63 ENVOY AIR Scheduled 250677 257720 11247929 476.89 3.87 Nonscheduled 119 0 3445 0.00 0.00 All services 250796 257720 11251374 476.89 3.87 EXPRESSJET AIRLINES INC. Scheduled 348535 358689 14871961 2.34 0.00 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION Scheduled 282749 282749 0 6073323.41 260.56 Nonscheduled 319 0 0 2319.98 0.00 All services 283068 282749 0 6075643.39 260.56 FRONTIER AIRLINES INC. Scheduled 104608 104608 16390017 0.00 0.00 HAWAIIAN AIRLINES INC. Scheduled 83036 83689 10659166 79560.57 703.53 Nonscheduled 38 0 6152 194.99 0.00 All services 83074 83689 10665318 79755.56 703.53 JETBLUE AIRWAYS Scheduled 323203 330470 36174290 0.00 0.00 Nonscheduled 16 0 1485 0.00 0.00 All services 323219 330470 36175775 0.00 0.00 POLAR AIR CARGO AIRWAYS Nonscheduled 3707 0 0 349630.07 0.00 SKYWEST AIRLINES INC.
  • Volume 22: Number 1 (2004)

    Volume 22: Number 1 (2004)

    Estimating Airline Employment: The Impact Of The 9-11 Terrorist Attacks David A. NewMyer, Robert W. Kaps, and Nathan L. Yukna Southern Illinois University Carbondale ABSTRACT In the calendar year prior to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, U. S. Airlines employed 732,049 people according to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics [BTS] of the U. S. Department of Transportation (Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U. S. Department of Transportation [BTS], 2001). Since the 9-11 attacks there have been numerous press reports concerning airline layoffs, especially at the "traditional," long-time airlines such as American, Delta, Northwest, United and US Airways. BTS figures also show that there has been a drop in U. S. Airline employment when comparing the figures at the end of the calendar year 2000 (732,049 employees) to the figures at the end of calendar year 2002 (642,797 employees) the first full year following the terrorist attacks (BTS, 2003). This change from 2000 to 2002 represents a total reduction of 89,252 employees. However, prior research by NewMyer, Kaps and Owens (2003) indicates that BTS figures do not necessarily represent the complete airline industry employment picture. Therefore, one key purpose of this research was to examine the scope of the post 9-11 attack airline employment change in light of all available sources. This first portion of the research compared a number of different data sources for airline employment data. A second purpose of the study will be to provide airline industry employment totals for both 2000 and 2002, if different from the BTS figures, and report those.