DOCSLIB.ORG

Major in Philosophy At

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Major in Philosophy At Peter Abelard • Theodor Adorno • Thomas Aquinas • Hannah Arendt • Aristotle • Augustine • Francis Bacon • Roland Barthes • Georges Bataille • Jean Baudrillard • Simone de Beauvoir • Walter Benjamin • George Berkeley • Judith Butler • Albert Camus • Noam Chomsky • Hélène Cixous • Gilles Deleuze • Jacques Derrida • Rene Descartes • John Dewey • Michel Foucault • Hans-Georg Gadamer • Jürgen Habermas • Donna Haraway • Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel • Martin Heidegger • Thomas Hobbes • David Hume • Edmund Husserl • Luce Irigaray • William James • Kant Immanuel • Julia Kristeva • Lao Tzu • Emmanuel Levinas • John Locke • Jean-François Lyotard • Maurice Merleau-Ponty • John Stewart Mill • G.E. Moore • Friedrich Nietzsche • Plato • W. V. Quine • Ayn Rand • Jean Jacques Rousseau • Jean-Paul Sartre • Arthur Schopenhauer • Benedict de Spinoza • Ludwig Wittgenstein • Peter Abelard • Theodor Adorno • Thomas Aquinas • Hannah Arendt • Aristotle • Augustine • Francis Bacon • Roland Barthes • Georges Bataille • Jean Baudrillard • Simone de Beauvoir • Walter Benjamin • George Berkeley • Judith Butler • Albert Camus • Noam Chomsky • Hélène Cixous • Gilles Deleuze • Jacques Derrida • Rene Descartes • John Dewey • Michel Foucault • Hans-Georg Gadamer • Jürgen Habermas • Donna Haraway • Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel • Martin Heidegger • Thomas Hobbes • David Hume • EdmundMAJOR Husserl • Luce Irigaray • William JamesIN • Kant ImmanuelPHILOSOPHY • Julia Kristeva • Lao Tzu • Emmanuel Levinas • John ATLocke • Jean-François Lyotard • Maurice Merleau-Ponty • John Stewart Mill • G.E. Moore • Friedrich Nietzsche • Plato • W. V. Quine • Ayn Rand • Jean Jacques Rousseau • Jean-Paul Sartre • Arthur Schopenhauer • Benedict de Spinoza • Ludwig Wittgenstein • Peter Abelard • Theodor Adorno • Thomas Aquinas • Hannah Arendt • Aristotle • Augustine • Francis Bacon • Roland Barthes • Georges Bataille • Jean Baudrillard • Simone de Beauvoir • Walter Benjamin • George Berkeley • Judith Butler • Albert Camus • Noam Chomsky • Hélène Cixous • Gilles Deleuze • Jacques Derrida • ReneTHE Descartes • John UNIVERSITY Dewey • Michel Foucault • Hans-Georg Gadamer of • NEWJürgen Habermas •ORLEANS Donna Haraway • Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel • Martin Heidegger • Thomas Hobbes • David Hume • Edmund Husserl • Luce Irigaray • William James • Kant Immanuel • Julia Kristeva • Lao Tzu • Emmanuel Levinas • John Locke • Jean-François Lyotard • Maurice Merleau-Ponty • John Stewart Mill • G.E. Moore • Friedrich Nietzsche • Plato • W. V. Quine • Ayn Rand • Jean Jacques Rousseau • Jean-Paul Sartre • Arthur Schopenhauer • Benedict1) deBEST Spinoza • LudwigLSAT Wittgenstein SCORES • Peter Abelard • Theodor Adorno • Thomas Aquinas • Hannah Arendt • Aristotle • Augustine • Francis Bacon • Roland Barthes • Georges Bataille among• Jean majors Baudrillard with more • Simone than 1000 de test Beauvoir takers • Walter Benjamin • George Berkeley • Judith Butler • Albert Camus • Noam Chomsky • Hélène Cixous • Gilles Deleuze • Jacques Derrida • Rene Descartes • John Dewey • Michel Foucault • Hans-Georg Gadamer • Jürgen Habermas • Donna Haraway • Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel • Martin Heidegger • Thomas Hobbes • David Hume • Edmund Husserl • Luce Irigaray • William James • Kant Immanuel • Julia Kristeva • Lao Tzu • Emmanuel Levinas • John Locke • Jean-François Lyotard • Maurice Merleau-Ponty • John Stewart Mill • G.E. Moore • Friedrich Nietzsche • Plato • W. V. Quine • Ayn Rand • Jean Jacques Rousseau • Jean-Paul Sartre • Arthur Schopenhauer • Benedict de Spinoza • Ludwig Wittgenstein • Peter Abelard • Theodor Adorno • Thomas Aquinas • Hannah Arendt • Aristotle • Augustine • Francis Bacon • Roland Barthes • Georges Bataille • Jean Baudrillard • Simone de Beauvoir • Walter Benjamin • George Berkeley • Judith Butler • Albert Camus • Noam Chomsky • Hélène Cixous • Gilles Deleuze • Jacques Derrida • Rene Descartes • John Dewey • Michel Foucault • Hans-Georg Gadamer • Jürgen Habermas • Donna Haraway • Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel • Martin Heidegger • Thomas Hobbes • David Hume • Edmund Husserl • Luce Irigaray • William James • Kant Immanuel • Julia Kristeva • Lao Tzu • Emmanuel Levinas • John Locke • Jean-François Lyotard • Maurice Merleau-Ponty • John Stewart Mill • G.E. Moore • Friedrich Nietzsche • Plato • W. V. Quine • Ayn Rand • Jean Jacques Rousseau • Jean-Paul Sartre • Arthur Schopenhauer • Benedict de Spinoza • Ludwig Wittgenstein • Peter Abelard • Theodor Adorno • Thomas Aquinas • Hannah Arendt • Aristotle • Augustine • Francis Bacon • Roland Barthes • Georges Bataille • Jean Baudrillard • Simone de Beauvoir • Walter Benjamin • George Berkeley • Judith Butler • Albert Camus • Noam Chomsky • Hélène Cixous • Gilles Deleuze • Jacques Derrida • Rene Descartes • John Dewey • Michel Foucault • Hans-Georg Gadamer • Jürgen Habermas • Donna Haraway • Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel • Martin Heidegger • Thomas Hobbes • David Hume • Edmund Husserl • Luce Irigaray • William James • Kant Immanuel • Julia Kristeva • Lao Tzu • Emmanuel Levinas • John Locke • Jean-François Lyotard • Maurice Merleau-Ponty • John Stewart Mill • G.E. Moore • Friedrich Nietzsche • Plato • W. V. Quine • Ayn Rand • Jean Jacques Rousseau • Jean-Paul Sartre • Arthur Schopenhauer • Benedict de Spinoza • Ludwig Wittgenstein • Peter Abelard • Theodor Adorno • Thomas Aquinas • Hannah Arendt • Aristotle • Augustine • Francis Bacon • Roland Barthes • Georges Bataille • Jean Baudrillard • Simone de Beauvoir • Walter Benjamin • George Berkeley • Judith Butler • Albert Camus • Noam Chomsky • Hélène Cixous • Gilles Deleuze • Jacques Derrida • Rene Descartes • John Dewey • Michel Foucault • Hans-Georg Gadamer • Jürgen Habermas • Donna Haraway •HISTORY Wilhelm ENGLISHFriedrich Hegel • Martin Heidegger • ThomasOTHER Hobbes • David Hume • Edmund Husserl • Luce Irigaray • William James • Kant Immanuel • Julia Kristeva • Lao Tzu • Emmanuel Levinas • John Locke • Jean-François Lyotard • Maurice Merleau-Ponty • John Stewart Mill • G.E. Moore • Friedrich Nietzsche • PHILOSOPHY PSYCHOLOGY Plato • W. V. Quine • Ayn Rand • Jean Jacques Rousseau • Jean-Paul Sartre • Arthur Schopenhauer • Benedict de Spinoza • Ludwig Wittgenstein • Peter Abelard • Theodor Adorno • Thomas Aquinas • Hannah Arendt • Aristotle • Augustine • Francis Bacon • Roland Barthes • Georges Bataille • Jean Baudrillard • Simone de Beauvoir • Walter Benjamin • POLITICAL SCIENCE CRIMINAL JUSTICE George Berkeley • Judith Butler • Albert Camus • Noam Chomsky • Hélène Cixous • Gilles Deleuze • Jacques Derrida • Rene Descartes • John Dewey • Michel Foucault • Hans-Georg Gadamer • Jürgen Habermas •ARTS Donna AND Haraway HUMANITIES • Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel • Martin Heidegger • Thomas Hobbes • David Hume • Edmund Husserl • Luce Irigaray • William James • Kant Immanuel • Julia Kristeva • Lao Tzu • Emmanuel Levinas • John Locke • Jean-François Lyotard • Maurice Merleau-Ponty • John Stewart Mill • G.E. Moore • Friedrich Nietzsche • Plato • W. V. Quine • Ayn Rand • Jean Jacques Rousseau • Jean-Paul Sartre • Arthur Schopenhauer • Benedict de Spinoza • Ludwig Wittgenstein • Peter Abelard • Theodor Adorno2) HIGHEST• Thomas Aquinas • HannahGRE Arendt SCORES • Aristotle • Augustine • Francis Bacon • Roland Barthes • Georges Bataille • Jean Baudrillard • Simone de Beauvoir • Walter Benjamin • George Berkeley • Judith Butler • Albert Camus • Noam Chomsky • Hélène Cixous • Gilles Deleuze • Jacques Derrida • Rene Descartes • John Dewey • Michel Foucault • Hans-Georg Gadamer • Jürgen Habermas • Donna Haraway • Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel • Martin Heidegger • Thomas Hobbes • David Hume • Edmund Husserl • Luce Irigaray • William James • Kant Immanuel • Julia Kristeva • Lao Tzu • Emmanuel Levinas • John Locke • Jean-François Lyotard • Maurice Merleau-Ponty • John Stewart Mill • G.E. Moore • Friedrich Nietzsche • Plato • W. V. Quine • Ayn Rand • Jean Jacques Rousseau • Jean-Paul Sartre • Arthur Schopenhauer • Benedict de Spinoza • Ludwig Wittgenstein * Peter Abelard • Theodor Adorno • Thomas Aquinas • Hannah Arendt • Aristotle • Augustine • Francis Bacon • Roland Barthes • Georges Bataille • Jean Baudrillard • Simone de Beauvoir • Walter Benjamin • George Berkeley • Judith Butler • Albert Camus • Noam Chomsky • Hélène Cixous • Gilles Deleuze • Jacques Derrida • Rene Descartes • John Dewey • Michel Foucault • Hans-Georg Gadamer • Jürgen Habermas • Donna Haraway • Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel • Martin Heidegger • Thomas Hobbes • David Hume • Edmund Husserl • Luce Irigaray • William James • Kant Immanuel • Julia Kristeva • Lao Tzu • Emmanuel Levinas • John Locke • Jean-François Lyotard • Maurice Merleau-Ponty • John Stewart Mill • G.E. Moore • Friedrich Nietzsche • Plato • W. V. Quine • Ayn Rand • Jean Jacques Rousseau • Jean-Paul Sartre • Arthur Schopenhauer • Benedict de Spinoza • Ludwig Wittgenstein • Peter Abelard • Theodor Adorno • Thomas Aquinas • Hannah Arendt • Aristotle • Augustine • Francis Bacon • Roland Barthes • Georges Bataille • Jean Baudrillard • Simone de Beauvoir • Walter Benjamin • George Berkeley • Judith Butler • Albert Camus • Noam Chomsky • Hélène Cixous • Gilles Deleuze • Jacques Derrida • Rene Descartes • John Dewey • Michel Foucault • Hans-Georg Gadamer • Jürgen Habermas • Donna Haraway • Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel • Martin Heidegger • Thomas Hobbes • David Hume • Edmund Husserl • Luce Irigaray • William James • Kant Immanuel • Julia Kristeva • Lao Tzu • Emmanuel Levinas • John Locke • Jean-François Lyotard • Maurice Merleau-Ponty • John Stewart Mill • G.E. Moore • Friedrich Nietzsche • Plato • W. V. Quine • Ayn Rand • Jean Jacques Rousseau
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ayn Rand? Ayn Rand Ayn
    Who Is Ayn Rand? Ayn Rand Few 20th century intellectuals have been as influential—and controversial— as the novelist and philosopher Ayn Rand. Her thinking still has a profound impact, particularly on those who come to it through her novels, Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead—with their core messages of individualism, self-worth, and the right to live without the impositions of others. Although ignored or scorned by some academics, traditionalists, pro- gressives, and public intellectuals, her thought remains a major influence on Ayn Rand many of the world’s leading legislators, policy advisers, economists, entre- preneurs, and investors. INTRODUCTION AN Why does Rand’s work remain so influential? Ayn Rand: An Introduction illuminates Rand’s importance, detailing her understanding of reality and human nature, and explores the ongoing fascination with and debates about her conclusions on knowledge, morality, politics, economics, government, AN INTRODUCTION public issues, aesthetics and literature. The book also places these in the context of her life and times, showing how revolutionary they were, and how they have influenced and continue to impact public policy debates. EAMONN BUTLER is director of the Adam Smith Institute, a leading think tank in the UK. He holds degrees in economics and psychology, a PhD in philosophy, and an honorary DLitt. A former winner of the Freedom Medal of Freedom’s Foundation at Valley Forge and the UK National Free Enterprise Award, Eamonn is currently secretary of the Mont Pelerin Society. Butler is the author of many books, including introductions on the pioneering economists Eamonn Butler Adam Smith, Milton Friedman, F.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom Quotes, May 2015 May 1. Freedom Is Not Worth Having If It
    Freedom Quotes, May 2015 May 1. Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes. Mahatma Ganhdi May 2. When a man is denied the right to live the life he believes in, he has no choice but to become an outlaw. Nelson Mandela May 3. The most important kind of freedom is to be what you really are. You trade in your reality for a role. There can’t be any large-scale revolution until there’s a personal revolution, on an individual level. It’s got to happen inside first. Jim Morrison May 4. Freedom lies in being bold. Robert Frost May 5. People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought they seldom use. Soren Kierkegaard May 6. Those who deny freedom to others, deserve it not for themselves. Abraham Lincoln May 7. I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do. Robert A. Heinlein May 8. If we don’t believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don’t believe in it at all. Noam Chomsky May 9. Freedom is nothing else but a chance to be better. Albert Camus May 10. ---To be free is not merely to cast off one’s chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others. Nelson Mandela May 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Uyghur Dispossession, Culture Work and Terror Capitalism in a Chinese Global City Darren T. Byler a Dissertati
    Spirit Breaking: Uyghur Dispossession, Culture Work and Terror Capitalism in a Chinese Global City Darren T. Byler A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2018 Reading Committee: Sasha Su-Ling Welland, Chair Ann Anagnost Stevan Harrell Danny Hoffman Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Anthropology ©Copyright 2018 Darren T. Byler University of Washington Abstract Spirit Breaking: Uyghur Dispossession, Culture Work and Terror Capitalism in a Chinese Global City Darren T. Byler Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Sasha Su-Ling Welland, Department of Gender, Women, and Sexuality Studies This study argues that Uyghurs, a Turkic-Muslim group in contemporary Northwest China, and the city of Ürümchi have become the object of what the study names “terror capitalism.” This argument is supported by evidence of both the way state-directed economic investment and security infrastructures (pass-book systems, webs of technological surveillance, urban cleansing processes and mass internment camps) have shaped self-representation among Uyghur migrants and Han settlers in the city. It analyzes these human engineering and urban planning projects and the way their effects are contested in new media, film, television, photography and literature. It finds that this form of capitalist production utilizes the discourse of terror to justify state investment in a wide array of policing and social engineering systems that employs millions of state security workers. The project also presents a theoretical model for understanding how Uyghurs use cultural production to both build and refuse the development of this new economic formation and accompanying forms of gendered, ethno-racial violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Rand, Hayek, and the Ethics of the Micro- and Macro-Cosmos Steven Horwitz
    Centenary Symposium, Part II Ayn Rand Among the Austrians Two Worlds at Once: Rand, Hayek, and the Ethics of the Micro- and Macro-cosmos Steven Horwitz Moreover, the structures of the extended order are made up not only of individuals but also of many, often overlapping, sub-orders within which old instinctual responses, such as solidarity and altruism, continue to retain some importance by assisting voluntary collaboration, even though they are incapable, by themselves, of creating a basis for the more extended order. Part of our present difficulty is that we must constantly adjust our lives, our thoughts and our emotions, in order to live simultaneously within different kinds of orders according to different rules. So we must learn to live in two sorts of worlds at once. — F. A. Hayek (1989, 18; emphasis added) Introduction A title that contains Rand, Hayek, and the ethics of anything might well raise a few eyebrows among the cognoscenti. After all, Ayn Rand was a champion of an objective ethics and railed against anyone who suggested that a meaningful ethics could be anything but objective in her sense. F. A. Hayek (1989, 10), by contrast, argued explicitly that “Ethics is the last fortress in which human pride must now bow in recognition of its origins. Such an evolutionary theory of morality is . neither instinctual nor a creation of reason.” Thus we are faced with two thinkers who have strongly opposed explanations for the source of ethical rules. However, despite those differences, both Rand and Hayek do wind up with some similar conclusions. For one, both argued that there was a strong link between ethics, political philosophy, and the role of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Camus and Absurd Communication: from Undecidability to Übercommunication
    Albert Camus and Absurd Communication: From Undecidability to Übercommunication by Jorge Lizarzaburu B.A., USFQ, 2010 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Communication 2012 This thesis entitled: Albert Camus and Absurd Communication: From Undecidability to Übercommunication written by Jorge M. Lizarzaburu has been approved for the Department of Communication Gerard Hauser Janice Peck Robert Craig Date 5/31/2012 The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we Find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards Of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline iii Lizarzaburu, Jorge M. (M.A., Communication, Department of Communication) Albert Camus and Absurd Communication: From Undecidability to Übercommunication Thesis directed by professor Gerard Hauser Communication conceived as understanding is a normative telos among scholars in the field. Absurdity, in the work of Albert Camus, can provide us with a framework to go beyond communication understood as a binary (understanding and misunderstanding) and propose a new conception of communication as absurd. That is, it is an impossible task, however necessary thus we need to embrace its absurdity and value the effort itself as much as the result. Before getting into Camus’ arguments I explain the work of Friedrich Nietzsche to understand the French philosopher in more detail. I describe eternal recurrence and Übermensch as two concepts that can be related to communication as absurd. Then I explain Camus’ notion of absurdity using a Nietzschean lens.
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Camus' Dialogue with Nietzsche and Dostoevsky Sean Derek Illing Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected]
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2014 Between nihilism and transcendence : Albert Camus' dialogue with Nietzsche and Dostoevsky Sean Derek Illing Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Illing, Sean Derek, "Between nihilism and transcendence : Albert Camus' dialogue with Nietzsche and Dostoevsky" (2014). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1393. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1393 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. BETWEEN NIHILISM AND TRANSCENDENCE: ALBERT CAMUS’ DIALOGUE WITH NIETZSCHE AND DOSTOEVSKY A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Political Science by Sean D. Illing B.A., Louisiana State University, 2007 M.A., University of West Florida, 2009 May 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation is the product of many supportive individuals. I am especially grateful for Dr. Cecil Eubank’s guidance. As a teacher, one can do no better than Professor Eubanks. Although his Socratic glare can be terrifying, there is always love and wisdom in his instruction. It is no exaggeration to say that this work would not exist without his support. At every step, he helped me along as I struggled to articulate my thoughts.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Studies Philosophy?
    Who Studies Philosophy? Created with support from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundat ion Amer ican Philosophical lDAssociation Academia Sheila Bair, president of Washington College and former FDIC chair Noam Chomsky , professor , activist , author, and public intellectual Alice Domurat Dreger, professor , activist , and author Rev. John I. Jenkins, President, University of Notre Dame Aung San Suu Kyi Activism Stokely Carmichael Stokely Carmichael / Kwame lure, civil rights leader Angela Davis, social act ivist Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., civil rights leader Aung San Suu Kyi, 2002 Nobel Peace Prize winner Business Herbert Allison Jr., former Fannie Mae CEO Martin Luther King Jr. Stewart Butterfield, co-founder of Flickr Angela Davis Patrick Byrne, founder of Overstock.com Robert Greenhill, investment banker Reid Hoffman, co-founder of Linked In Damon Horowitz, entrepreneur and in-house philosopher at Google Carl Icahn, investor and former CEO of TWA Airlines Gerald Levin, former CEO of Time Warner, Inc. John Mackey, co-founder and co-CEO of Whole Foods Market Stewart Butterfield Sheila Bair Lachlan Murdoch, media magnate and son of Rupert Murdoch Max Palevsky, co-founder of Intel and venture capitalist Larry Sanger, co-founder of Wikipedia George Soros, investor and ph ilanthropist Peter Thiel, founder of PayPal News and Journalism Barbara Amiel, Lady Black of Cross harbour, journalist and writer Juan Williams Larry Sanger John Chancellor, journal ist Chris Hayes, journalist, political commentator, and MSNBC host Tamara Keith, journalist and NPR White House correspondent Kathryn Jean Lopez, journalist and political commentator Stone Phillips, broadcaster George F. Will, journalist , author , and political commentator Juan Williams, journalist Kathryn Jean Lopez Photos pub lic do main o r Creati ve Com mons.
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Camus As Moral Politician
    Articles The Passion and the Spirit: Albert Camus as Moral Politician Jan Klabbers* TABLE OF CONTENTS: I. Introduction. – II. A manifesto. – III. On Camus. – IV. Camus and the virtues. – V. A smouldering continent. – V.1. Financial crisis. – V.2. Refugee flows. – V.3. Russia and Crimea. – V.4. Refer- enda, governance, responsibility. – VI. To conclude. ABSTRACT: This essays addresses the curious circumstance that for all their visibility on blogs, twitter and the 'op-ed' pages of newspapers, public intellectuals offer remarkably little ethical guidance regarding current events and crises. These intellectuals may offer their expertise (explanations, predictions), but do not provide much ethical inspiration, almost as if 'right' and 'wrong' have be- come meaningless categories. Things were different a few generations ago, when the likes of Al- bert Camus would search their souls in order to figure out how to live. This essay portrays Camus as private citizen and public moralist, and briefly discusses current political events in a mindset inspired by Camus. KEYWORDS: Albert Camus – virtue ethics – political crisis – Europe – public intellectuals. “… for us Europe is a home of the spirit where for the last twenty centuries the most amazing adventure of the human spirit has been going on”.1 I. Introduction Europe is, if not on fire, at least smouldering. The last couple of years alone have seen the continent confronted with the unabashed annexation of the Crimea; the shooting down, accidental or otherwise, of civilian aircraft; a financial crisis and a country on the brink of bankruptcy; and an influx of refugees seen as threatening in its own right, and which threatens to bring down the European Union (EU) and threatens to turn Europe * Academy Professor (Martti Ahtisaari Chair), University of Helsinki, and Visiting Research Professor, Erasmus Law School, Erasmus University Rotterdam, [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Page the Stranger Albert Camus Language A
    The Stranger Albert Camus Language A: Literature English III IB RISING JUNIORS Name__________________________Date________________Period______________ 1 | P a g e English A: Literature HL Junior year Summer Reading Assignment – Mrs. Flanagan Email: [email protected] Directions: Read The Stranger by Albert Camus (pronounced: al-bear camu) and answer the questions in this packet. You will need to complete the following: # 1 and 2, are worth up to 100 points each: (1) the reading questions (pp. 14-20) (2) the assignments listed in Parts I and II (pp. 20-21) and Read the concepts and information outlines on pages 3-11 – these will be very important concepts to know. Review the literary terms on pages 22-26. Be prepared for a test to cover your summer readings: the novel and the terminology, upon returning to school. This packet is due on the first day of school, Monday, August 12, 2019. If you will be out of town, still on vacation, or otherwise indisposed, please mail with adequate time to reach me by the due date to: Ms. Jennifer Flanagan William T. Dwyer High School 13601 North Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 As you read, consider the following: (Just think about them and their role and significance to the work.) The People What is the role of each of the people in the novel? What does each symbolize? Which characters, if any, are essential? . the director of the home . the caretaker from the home . old Thomas Pérez . Raymond . Masson . Salamano . Marie . Céleste 2 | P a g e . Witnesses at the trial .
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Camus and the Anticolonials: Why Camus Would Not Play the Zero Sum Game James D
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications, Department of History History, Department of 2014 Albert Camus and the Anticolonials: Why Camus Would Not Play the Zero Sum Game James D. Le Sueur University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/historyfacpub Part of the Continental Philosophy Commons, European Languages and Societies Commons, French and Francophone Literature Commons, History Commons, and the Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies Commons Le Sueur, James D., "Albert Camus and the Anticolonials: Why Camus Would Not Play the Zero Sum Game" (2014). Faculty Publications, Department of History. 192. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/historyfacpub/192 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications, Department of History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. WHY CAMUS WOULD NOT PLAY THE ZERO SUM GAME / LE SUEUR 27 Albert Camus and the Anticolonials: Why Camus Would Not Play the Zero Sum Game1 James D. Le Sueur, University of Nebraska, Lincoln IN 1994, I RETURNED FROM PARIS TO HYDE PARK just in time to catch a lecture about Albert Camus that an esteemed colleague, the late Tony Judt, was giving at the University of Chicago. I was much younger then, eager to engage in debate, and I had just spent most of the past two years turning over the recently opened pages of Camus’ private papers in Paris and trolling through the private papers of other prominent French intellectuals, as well as newly declassified state archives for what was to become my first book,Uncivil War.2 I had also done dozens of interviews with Camus’ friends and fellow travelers (Jean Daniel, Germaine Tillion, Jean Pélégri, etc.), as well as old adversaries (including Françis Jeanson).
    [Show full text]
  • From the Instructor
    From the Instructor Nicholas wrote this paper for my WR 150 course that surveys debates surrounding the free market. The second major paper in the course challenges students to contend with two uncompromising visions of the market’s virtues and evils: Karl Marx’s narrative of exploitation and estranged labor in The Communist Manifesto vs. John Galt’s forceful speech at the end of Atlas Shrugged, through which Ayn Rand asserts that competition alone can engender individual autonomy and national pros- perity. As a writer, the young Marx exemplifies many of the lessons that I teach my students. He provides an insightful and consistent framework for analysis—class relations—but does so through an elegant story with clear protagonists, antagonists, and a compelling narrative of historical struggle. Rand consciously inverts aspects of Marx’s narrative, contrasting “men of ability,” personified by Galt himself, with the weaker strata of society who seek shelter from the vicissitudes of struggle. Nicholas demonstrates in this paper his capacity to grasp the core points of contention between Rand and Marx, but also to elucidate the relevance of their grand visions for contemporary political debates in clear, insightful, and often clever prose. Nicholas frequently settled on a theme and argument from the first draft of his papers, and spent subsequent drafts developing those ideas further. He made good use of scholarly sources to substantiate his argument in this paper, especially when demon- strating that Rand, far from being a marginal twentieth-century thinker, has attained a mythical status for the contemporary American Right that is nearly on a par with the cult of Marxism in the scholarly and political movements of the past century.
    [Show full text]
  • Moral Philosophy 101 Warren J
    What do we “owe” each other? Moral Philosophy 101 Warren J. The Caries Epidemic in Native American Communities The First Law Of Healthcare Improvement “Every system is perfectly designed to achieve exactly the results it gets” So If your results are consistent, but unsatisfactory, you need to redesign the system (…but first you have to realize you are in a “system”). Donald Berwick, Do we lack social cohesion? Collective efficacy is the glue that binds neighborhoods, cities, states, and countries together Keriana Carll cries in pain nearly every day. Her mouth hurts. She doesn't eat much. No dentist in Sarasota or Manatee County was willing to treat her. The only dentist her publicly funded Medicaid insurance company found who was willing to help the child is 50 miles north, in central Tampa. I have had a change of heart. I now believe that Democrats are entirely responsible for the mess that Medicare is in today. If the people crying for more free stuff would just shut up and get a job, and stop smoking cigarettes, using crack, wasting their money on chips and beer, they would have enough money to provide health care for their children Keriana Carll cries in pain nearly every day. Her mouth hurts. She doesn't eat much. No dentist in Sarasota or Manatee County was willing to treat her. The only dentist her publicly funded Medicaid insurance company found who was willing to help the child is 50 miles north, in central Tampa. If you have children there are expense and responsibilities, but in today's world those responsibilities are being transferred to the guy next door via government.
    [Show full text]