DOCSLIB.ORG

Age-Related Foraging Behaviour in Honey Bees Under Artificial Conditions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Age-Related Foraging Behaviour in Honey Bees Under Artificial Conditions Original article Age-related foraging behaviour in honey bees under artificial conditions MH Pham-Delègue M Le Métayer, P Douault, C Masson INRA-CNRS (URA 1190), Laboratoire de Neurobiologie Comparée des Invertébrés, 91440 Bures-sur-Yvette, France (Received 31 May 1989; accepted 24 January 1990) Summary &mdash; The distribution of foraging among 4 worker groups of different ages was observed in a flight room. Foraging was mostly performed by the oldest workers, who came to forage first and were the most numerous. Workers from the other groups visited the feeding station infrequently until the second half of the observation period, then increased their visits. Regardless of their age group, each individual coming to forage performed a constant average level of activity, despite some vari- ability in the individual scores of visits. These experiments stressed a strong intra-age group interac- tion among a population of potential foragers, and allowed us to record data on both group and indi- vidual strategies. In conjunction with studies performed under natural conditions, our experiments conducted under artificial conditions may contribute to the analysis of some basic parameters of for- aging behaviour. Apis mellifera (ligustica x caucasica) x mellifera / foraging / age effect / division of labour / flight room INTRODUCTION worker population were removed, it was well demonstrated that workers could shift In the normal ontogeny of honey bee from one task to another (Rösch, 1930; Winston tasks, younger workers are devoted to Lindauer, 1961; Kolmes, 1985; hive duties and older workers perform for- and Fergusson, 1985). These efforts, as aging (Rösch, 1925, 1930; Ribbands, well as that of Seeley (1982) who tested 1952; Lindauer, 1953; Sekiguchi and Sak- predictions about the design of the age agami, 1966; Michener, 1974; Seeley, polyethism schedule for labour inside the 1982; Winston and Punnett, 1982; hive, were concerned with the shift of Kolmes, 1985). However, it is known that workers duties. Little time was devoted to there is considerable flexibility in the ages analyzing the division of labour among at which workers shift from hive to field du- workers all performing the task of foraging, ties, depending on internal colony require- except Seeley (1983) who explored divi- ments or external conditions. Through ex- sion of labour between scouts and recruits periments where specific groups of the in honey bee foraging, to determine the * Correspondence and reprints ecological significance of the dance lan- The foraging behaviour was observed on a guage. feeding device (Pham-Delegue and Masson, 1985). This device provided sources of sugar In this paper, we aim to detail the inter- solution associated with a scent. A 50% sucrose group or inter-individual distribution of the solution, known to be highly acceptable to hon- foraging task among a population of ey bees (Waller, 1972), was given as a reward. known age foragers. We have measured The associated scent was geraniol 1 % in paraf- fin oil. Six scented feeders were distributed on a the distribution among groups of foragers slowly rotating device (1/3 rpm). Such a device of closely related ages to assess the de- attracts a high number of foragers which can be gree of flexibility of such a task under con- fed simultaneously. trolled conditions. The experimental device was positioned at 1.50 m from the hive entrance every day be- tween 2 and 4 pm. To maintain the motivation to MATERIALS AND METHODS search for food, at times other than the 2-4 pm period, the honey bees were fed at the same lo- cation with a 50% sucrose solution and a dish of The experiments were conducted under artificial pollen at all times. No additional food was given conditions to control the constitution of the ex- in the hive. perimental colony and to standardize the obser- The device was follow- vation The were carried presented every day procedure. experiments the introduction of the last but the out in a room of 12 m3 vol, as described ing age group, flight by data below with the first Douault (1978). The light intensity was 300 lux reported begin sponta- neous on the device. the observa- with a 12 hr 12 hr The landing Thus, day - night photoperiod. tions started 31 d after the introduction of the was 24 ± 2 °C with 55% relative temperature first of workers in the hive and the The air in the room was renewed group experi- humidity. reg- mental ended 38 d later. ularly (5 times per h). period The observation was as follows: Experiments were conducted with a colony procedure within the each age- of 3-strain hybrid Apis mellifera (ligustica x cau- experimental period, marked bee was collected at its first on casica) x mellifera which produce high honey landing a feeder and labelled with a num- yields under natural conditions (Fresnaye et al, individually 1974; Comuet and Fresnaye, 1979), and which bered tag according to its rank of landing. Every 15 min, the and of the is known to exhibit a high level of foraging under identity (colour number) artificial conditions (Pham-Delegue et al, 1984). foragers on the device was recorded, up to 8 re- cordings per observation day. Experiments were The colony was first constituted of unknown carried out daily, with several days of disruption, winter worker and later age bees, replaced by leading to 22 d of observations. Mortality was workers: a old with a age-marked 2-year queen noted every observation day by collecting dead cluster of 150 worker bees of unknown age bees on the floor of the flight room. were first introduced in the experimental hive (21 x 21.5 x 27 cm), set with 5 empty combs and 1 comb filled with food; these escort bees RESULTS were later removed when arriving at the feeding device. Four samples of new born worker bees were successively introduced, leading to a the the % cu- range of 4 groups of workers differing in age by During experimental period 14 d from the first group introduced to the pre- mulative mortality per group according to ceeding one: group I (400 individuals), group II age (ie number of dead workers, including (310 individuals) introduced 3 d later, group III foragers and non-foragers, versus the ini- (440 individuals) introduced 5 d later than group tial number of workers x 100), increased II, IV introduced 6 d later group (800 individuals) of the all than group III. Each age group was identified by similarly; regardless group, points a different coloured spot painted on the thorax fitted with a curve (y = 0.71 exp (0.07 x)), of the workers. with a highly significant level of correlation (r = 0.97,82 df). Until 35 d old, mortality spectively, for the oldest foragers from was of 0-5%; between 35-70 d old, mor- groups I, II, III, IV. The statistical compari- tality increased linearly from 5-65%. son of the proportions, within the common age-range when the 4 groups were Since the mortality was approximately present (from 33-57 day old), showed that equivalent in every group, it did not affect the foraging activity was significantly high- the foraging activity differentially among er in group I than in the other groups (2- each this was group. Thus, activity report- tailed, signed ranks Mann-Whitney test, ed as the of new daily percentage foragers P < 0.01); the activity in group II was lower number of new is cumulated (the foragers than in group IV (P < 0.05). The highest observation versus the initial every day) proportion of foragers from group I number of workers (eg, 400 in group I), as reached the value of 30% workers dedicat- a function of age (fig 1). The age when the ed to foraging at the end of the experi- first member of a its first group performed ment; bees from the 3 other groups were foraging trip was, respectively, 32, 33, 28, involved in foraging with maximum values 18 day old for groups I, II, III and IV. Work- of 11-13%; group II being the least repre- ers from group IV was recorded simultane- sented. At the end of the experiment, ously; workers from groups II and III ap- groups I and II, whose foragers were the peared at the third observation day. At the oldest, reached a steady state, while the end of the experiment, workers were still number of foragers was still increasing foraging at an age of 71, 68, 63, 57 day re- among groups III and IV. Consistent with the fact that foragers 80 (17th observation day), 106 (17th ob- from group I were the most numerous, servation day), respectively, for groups I, they were the most active until the 10th II, III, IV. observation day (performing more than 75% of the visits), and were then progres- Considering the individual activity ac- sively replaced by the other groups, to a fi- cording to age group, by reporting the nal level of 16.3% visits in group I, 14.2% number of visits per observation day as a in group II, 25.5% in group III, 43% in function of particular individuals performing group IV, at the 22nd observation day. The these visits (fig 2), no difference appeared highest number of visits was 245 (6th ob- between the groups. Globally, the number servation day), 63 (16th observation day), of visits was positively correlated with the number of individuals (r = 0.93, 86 df, P < servation days when each individual came 0.001; y = 4.74 x - 1.17). Thus, each indi- to forage (fig 3). Over 22 observation days, vidual performed the same average num- 19 foragers were observed only once and ber of 4.74 visits per observation day, did not come on the following observation whatever group it came from.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stress Decreases Pollen Foraging Performance in Honeybees Célia Bordier1, Simon Klein2,3, Yves Le Conte1, Andrew B
    © 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2018) 221, jeb171470. doi:10.1242/jeb.171470 SHORT COMMUNICATION Stress decreases pollen foraging performance in honeybees Célia Bordier1, Simon Klein2,3, Yves Le Conte1, Andrew B. Barron3,* and Cédric Alaux1,*,‡ ABSTRACT depletion (Kralj and Fuchs, 2010; Alaux et al., 2014; Naug, 2014; Foraging in honeybees is energetically demanding. Here, we Wolf et al., 2014). Stressors may also affect forager decision- examined whether stressors, which generally increase metabolic making processes as a consequence of the energetic challenges of demands, can impair foraging performance. A controlled non- the stressor, in which case bees may show a preference for pathogenic stressor (immune challenge) resulted in a change in the carbohydrate-rich resources to supply their own energy needs. The foraging preferences of bees. It reduced pollen foraging and finding that the gene coding for the pheromone biosynthesis- increased the duration of trips in pollen foragers. Stress also activating neuropeptide, a neuropeptide known to be present at reduced the amount of octopamine in the brain of pollen foragers (a higher levels in nectar foragers than in pollen foragers (Brockmann biogenic amine involved in the regulation of foraging and flight et al., 2009), is over-expressed in parasitized bees (McDonnell et al., behaviour in insects). According to the literature, flight metabolic rate 2013) provides some indirect support for this hypothesis. Stress can is higher during pollen foraging than during nectar foraging, and decrease sucrose responsiveness (Pankiw and Page, 2003), which is nectar gives a higher energetic return relative to the foraging effort lower in nectar foragers than in pollen foragers (Pankiw and Page, when compared with pollen.
    [Show full text]
  • Colony Growth and Seasonal Management of Honey Bees
    Colony Growth and Seasonal Management of Honey Bees Management of honey bees varies based on whether Although honey is essential food for bees, colonies pollination or honey production is the primary objective. cannot grow without sufficient amounts of incoming A simple scheme for those interested in maximizing honey pollen. Pollen contains the essential amino acids, sterols, production can be a template for any beginning beekeeper. minerals, and vitamins that bee larvae need to grow into Managing honey bees involves seasonal manipulations adult honey bees. Bee colonies cannot grow without brood of hive space to provide room when necessary for the production, and brood production hinges on good-quality expanding brood-rearing area and for storage of surplus nutrition that comes from pollen. Hence, bee colonies grow honey. Good management includes reducing colony space largest during or just after periods of maximum numbers during periods of dearth of incoming food, preventing of blooming plants in the spring and autumn (Figure 1). swarming of bees, feeding food supplements to offset any These periods are called honey flows. shortcomings in winter stores or to help stimulate brood Blooming of food plants can be predicted by a crude production during critical periods of colony development, geographic rule of adding a 1-week delay in bloom for keeping young and good-quality queens in colonies, and every 200 miles or so northward in latitude. For example, if managing diseases and parasites. sumac is blooming heavily in southern Mississippi during the first week of May, a person living near the Mississippi- Basic Growth Cycle Tennessee border might expect sumac to bloom from the Good seasonal management begins with understand- third week of May into the beginning of June.
    [Show full text]
  • Establishing a Honey Bee Colony
    ESTABLISHING A HONEY BEE COLONY SUCCESS IN THE FIRST YEAR Meghan Milbrath, April 2016 Honey bees colonies should live from year to year in most climates where they are kept. Just like other perennials, new honey bee colonies require different care when they are started and their management changes as they become older and more established. In beekeeping, an established colony is one that has survived a winter with a queen and cluster of bees, will generally reproduce (swarm) in spring, have sufficient comb built, and has enough bees to ensure survival (if it is kept free from environmental threats and disease). A new colony is started by one of four ways 1) purchased packages, 2) purchased nucs, 3) caught swarms, and 4) splits. In all of these cases, the population will be much smaller, will not have the same ratio of all ages of bees, and will not function like a fully operating colony. A new honey bee colony has one goal - grow large enough to have enough food to survive its first winter. In Northern climates, where the season is shorter, new colonies often cannot become fully established by the time winter sets in without extra help from the beekeeper. Picture a new colony like a baby animal, or a new fruit tree. While an older animal may be able to fend for itself, a young one cannot. And while an older fruit tree will bear fruit, a young seedling will put its energy into root production and growth. Likewise, a new honey bee colony will need more support while it is small, and it will likely not provide a crop during its first year.
    [Show full text]
  • FORAGE LEGUMES Clovers, Birdsfoot Trefoil, Cicer Milkvetch, Crownvetch and Alfalfa
    FORAGE LEGUMES Clovers, Birdsfoot Trefoil, Cicer Milkvetch, Crownvetch and Alfalfa Craig C. Sheaffer Nancy J. Ehlke Kenneth A. Albrecht Jacob M. Jungers Minnesota Agricultural Jared J. Goplen Experiment Station Station Bulletin 608-2018 Forage Legumes Clovers, Birdsfoot Trefoil, Cicer Milkvetch, Crownvetch and Alfalfa Craig C. Sheaffer Nancy J. Ehlke Kenneth A. Albrecht Jacob M. Jungers Jared J. Goplen Station Bulletin 608-2018 Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station University of Minnesota Saint Paul, Minnesota The University of Minnesota shall provide equal access to and opportunity in its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, gender, age, marital status, disability, public assistance status, veteran status, sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. Editors Craig Sheaffer, Nancy Ehlke, and Jacob Jungers are agronomists with the University of Minnesota Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics in the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences, Saint Paul, Minnesota. Jared Goplen is an Extension Educator in Crops for University of Minnesota Extension. Kenneth Albrecht is an agronomist with the University of Wisonsin’s Department of Agronomy. Acknowledgments This publication is a revision of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 597-1993, Forage Le- gumes, orginally issued in 1993 and then updated in 2003 and then again in 2018. The editors of this third edition gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the coauthors of the original publication: Harlan Ford, Neal Martin, Russell Mathison, David Rabas and Douglas Swanson. Publications editing, design and development for the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station is by Shelly Gustafson, experiment station communications specialist. Photos are by Dave Hansen or Don Breneman.
    [Show full text]
  • Teen Facilitator Guide Created By
    2016 Teen Facilitator Guide Created by: Robert L. Horton, PhD, Agri-Science Professor, College of Food, Agriculture, and Environmental Sciences, The Ohio State University Patty House, MS, County Extension Educator 3, College of Food, Agriculture, and Environmental Sciences, The Ohio State University Denise Ellsworth, Program Director, Honey Bee and Native Pollinator Education, The Ohio State University Denise M. Johnson, Program Manager, Ohio State University Extension Master Gardener Volunteer Program, The Ohio State University Margaret Duden, SimplySmart Education Specialists Liz Kasper, Pete Sandvik, Northern Design Group The 4-H Ag Innovators Experience Honey Bee Challenge focuses on a critical component—honey bees—to growing food and feeding the world. Approximately one in every three bites we eat is the result of these pollinators at work. Apples, pumpkins, strawberries, alfalfa, sunflowers, oranges, buckwheat, and almonds are just some of the crops that rely on honey bee pollination. As the Teen Facilitator for this activity, you will help youth learn that: • Honey bees and other pollinators are essential contributors to growing food and feeding the world. • Honey bees utilize a combination of natural and agricultural habitats to maintain healthy hives. • Preserving and maintaining the natural foraging habitats of honey bees is important. • Commercial beekeepers transport honey bees all across the country to boost crop yield, since there is not enough managed honeybees or native pollinators to maximize agricultural production. • Youth can contribute to honey bee health in their own communities. The 4-H Ag Innovators Honey Bee Challenge is an ideal activity for 3rd to 8th grade youth at summer reading programs, summer camps, summer childcare settings, festivals, and fairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Forage for Native Bee Crop Pollinators
    General —7 National Agroforestry Center AGROFORESTRY NOTES AF Note —33 August 2006 Improving Forage For Native Bee Crop Pollinators Introduction Agroforestry practices can provide essential habitat for bees, our most important crop polli- nators. The European honey bee receives most of the credit for crop pollination, but the num- ber of managed honey bee hives is half of what it was in the 1950s; and this number con- tinues to decline because of disease and the immigration of aggressive races of honey bees. Native bees, however, significantly contribute to crop pollination – and, in some cases, pro- vide all of the pollination. An Osmia aglaia female pollinates a black In order to support the native bee community, a raspberry flower. Photo courtesy Xerces Society wealth of flowers is necessary. Unfortunately, For Invertebrate Conservation. heavily managed farm landscapes often lack the diversity and abundance of flowers that native bees require. By providing abundant and diverse pollen and nectar sources, a diverse community of native bee species will increase, adjacent crops may yield more, growers could rely less on imported European honey bees, and farm biodiversity and other wildlife species will benefit. This Agroforestry Note discusses how to maximize the ability of an agroforestry practice to support crop-pollinating bees, including a step-by-step method for planning forage enhancements. Other flo- ral visitors, like butterflies, do not pollinate crops, but will also benefit from the techniques below. Step 1: Identify Existing pollen and nectar sources can often be found near fencerows or hedgerows, riparian buffers, and protect bee other natural areas, or any place on or around the site where a variety of plants (weeds or otherwise) forage already in grow.
    [Show full text]
  • Forage and Habitat for Pollinators in the Northern Great Plains—Implications for U.S
    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forage and Habitat for Pollinators in the Northern Great Plains—Implications for U.S. Department of Agriculture Conservation Programs Open-File Report 2020–1037 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey A B C D E F G H I Cover. A, Bumble bee (Bombus sp.) visiting a locowood flower. Photograph by Stacy Simanonok, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). B, Honey bee (Apis mellifera) foraging on yellow sweetclover (Melilotus officinalis). Photograph by Sarah Scott, USGS. C, Two researchers working on honey bee colonies in a North Dakota apiary. Photograph by Elyssa McCulloch, USGS. D, Purple prairie clover (Dalea purpurea) against a backdrop of grass. Photograph by Stacy Simanonok, USGS. E, Conservation Reserve Program pollinator habitat in bloom. Photograph by Clint Otto, USGS. F, Prairie onion (Allium stellatum) along the slope of a North Dakota hillside. Photograph by Mary Powley, USGS. G, A researcher assesses a honey bee colony in North Dakota. Photograph by Katie Lee, University of Minnesota. H, Honey bee foraging on alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Photograph by Savannah Adams, USGS. I, Bee resting on woolly paperflower (Psilostrophe tagetina). Photograph by Angela Begosh, Oklahoma State University. Front cover background and back cover, A USGS research transect on a North Dakota Conservation Reserve Program field in full bloom. Photograph by Mary Powley, USGS. Forage and Habitat for Pollinators in the Northern Great Plains—Implications for U.S. Department of Agriculture Conservation Programs By Clint R.V. Otto, Autumn Smart, Robert S. Cornman, Michael Simanonok, and Deborah D. Iwanowicz Prepared in cooperation with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Planting Forage for Honey Bees in Canada a Guide for Farmers, Land
    Planting Forage for Honey Bees in Canada A guide for farmers, land managers, and gardeners Planting Guide Guide Planting Planting This guide entitled Planting Forage for Honey Bees in Canada: A guide for farmers, land managers, and gardeners, was produced by Pollinator Partnership Canada. The guide was commissioned for discussion purposes by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) on behalf of the Bee Health Roundtable, an industry-government forum. The content of this guide does not necessarily reflect the opinions or interests of the entire Bee Health Roundtable membership or AAFC, nor does it necessarily reflect the opinions or interests of all parties interviewed during the researching of this guide. The recommendations resulting from the guide are not binding on any participant of the VCRTs or AAFC. © HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA 2017 as represented by the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food - Department of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada 2 Planting Forage for Honey Bees in Canada: A guide for farmers, land managers, and gardeners Why Support Honey Bees? _________________________________4 About this Guide ___________________________________________5 Honey Bees _______________________________________________6 Where to Put Honey Bee Forage _____________________________8 How to Preserve, Enhance, Maintain __________________________9 Plant Selection and Design _________________________________11 Site Preparation and Invasive Species ______________________ 12 Integrative Vegetation Management ________________________ 13
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Master Beekeeper Program Advanced Level Module What Is Pollen?
    POLLINATION Texas Master Beekeeper Program Advanced Level Module What is pollen? • Main protein source for honey bees. • Necessary for honey bee growth and development. • Composed of many different components: • Water, crude protein, ether extract, carbohydrates, starch, lipids, and other unknowns. • The quantity of these components vary between pollen sources. Where does pollen come from? • Produced by the stamen (male reproductive part of a flower). • Pollen needs to be transferred from stamen to stigma (female reproductive part of a flower) for pollination to occur. • Bees play a major role in pollinating plants. Credit: Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida Where does pollen come from? • All plants vary in the amount and quality of pollen that the flowers produce. • Plants can either: • Produce lots of low quality pollen • Ex: raspberry, blackberry, sunflower, pine • Produce very little of high quality pollen • Ex: canola, almond Why do bees need pollen? • Pollen is necessary for the growth and development of honey bees. • Larvae are fed both brood food and bee bread. • Soon after emergence, bees will consume bee bread to finalize their development. • One worker larvae requires 124-145 mg of pollen. • High protein content longer life • Low protein content decrease in brood rearing • Protein content is key for a healthy hive. Pollen collection • A colony requires 15-55kg of pollen each year. • A single colony can collect ~57kg of pollen per year. • 15-30% of foragers collect pollen. • Pollen is chosen by its odor and grain shape, not by its nutritional value. Pollen collection - Corbicula • Honey bees carry pollen on the corbicula (“pollen basket”) • Located on the last pair of legs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Benefits of Pollen to Honey Bees1 Amanda Ellis, Jamie D
    ENY152 The Benefits of Pollen to Honey Bees1 Amanda Ellis, Jamie D. Ellis, Michael K. O’Malley, and Catherine M. Zettel Nalen2 The honey bee’s basic nutritional requirements are similar to those of humans; namely, they need proteins (amino acids), carbohydrates (sugars), minerals, fats/lipids (fatty acids), vitamins, and water. In order to meet their nutri- tional requirements, honey bees collect nectar, pollen, and water. Bees forage for water at almost any source close to their colonies. These sources include ponds, streams, leaky taps, the neighbor’s pool, dog dishes, and bird baths. During hot weather, honey bees use water to cool the colony by fanning and evaporating water droplets inside the hive. Water may also provide essential minerals in addition to hydration. Honey bees consume processed nectar (honey) and pollen (bee bread), both of which are provided by flowers (Figure 1). Nectar, which bees convert to honey, serves as the primary source of carbohydrates for the bees. It provides energy for flight, colony maintenance, and general daily ac- Figure 1. Honey bee on an orange blossom. tivities. Without a source or surplus of carbohydrates, bees Credits: Honey Bee Research and Extension Laboratory, University of will perish within a few days. This is why it is important to Florida make sure that colonies have sufficient honey stores during the winter months. Colonies can starve quickly! Nectar also Pollen Content is a source of various minerals, such as calcium, copper, Pollen, in the form of bee bread, is the honey bee’s main potassium, magnesium, and sodium, but the presence and source of protein and it also provides fats/lipids, minerals, concentration of minerals in nectar varies by floral source.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern American Nectar Sources for Honey Bees
    Northern American nectar sources for honey bees Huguenot Beekeepers Association Northern American nectar sources for honey bees • The nectar resource in a given area depends on the kinds of flowering plants present and their blooming periods. Which kinds grow in an area depends on soil texture, soil pH, soil drainage, daily maximum and minimum temperatures, precipitation, extreme minimum winter temperature, and growing degree days. The plants listed below grow in USDA Hardiness zone 5. A good predictor for when a plant will bloom and produce nectar is a calculation of the growing degree days. Hopkins' Bioclimatic Law states that in North America east of the Rockies, a 130 m (400-foot) increase in elevation, a 4° change in latitude north (444.48 km), or a 10° change in longitude east (two thirds of a time zone) will cause a biological event to occur four days later in the spring or four days earlier in the fall. In botany, the term phenology refers to the timing of flower emergence, sequence of bloom, fruiting, and leaf drop in autumn. • The classification in major or minor nectar source is very dependent on the agricultural use of the land. An agricultural crop such as canola or alfalfa may be a major or minor source depending on local plantings. Generally, the more diverse a forage area is, the better for a stationary apiary. Urban, suburban and areas not under cultivation provide more consistent warm-season nectar forage than areas that are heavily cultivated with only a few agricultural crops. The nectar sources from large cultivated fields of blooming apples, cherries, canola, melons, sunflowers, clover etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants for Bees
    Plants For Bees Gina Anderson ANR/CD Extension Educator Floyd County First…A Little Honeybee Trivia… • How many flowers must a honeybee tap to make a pound of honey? 2 million • How far will a bee fly in search of forage (nectar/pollen)? up to 3 miles • How fast does a honeybee fly? approximately 15 miles per hour • How long have bees been producing honey from flowering plants? 10-20 million years • How many flowers does a honeybee visit during one collection trip? 50-100 February 24, 2014 • "Honey bee pollination supports an estimated $15 billion worth of agricultural production, including more than 130 fruits and vegetables that are the foundation of a nutritious diet. The future security of America's food supply depends on healthy honey bees," said Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack. "Expanded support for research, combined with USDA's other efforts to improve honey bee health, should help America's beekeepers combat the current, unprecedented loss of honey bee hives each year." Here’s the dilemma… Often…if left to there own schedule, bees would peak their numbers after the peak of the nectar flow because they don’t increase their numbers until the major nectar flow starts. The result…the beekeeper has a strong workforce of bees after…not during the time they are needed…. A classic labor/work load mismatch… Crops Pollinated by Honeybees • Almond, asparagus, buckwheat, cherry, cole crops, lavender, lespedeza, muskmelon, pear, pepper, persimmon, plum, pumpkin and squash, quince, radish, raspberry, sunflower, turnip, vetch. • Alfalfa, apples, blackberries, clover, cotton, crabapples, cucumbers, eggplant, grapes, paw paw, lima beans, okra, peach, nectarine, peanut, strawberry, tomato, watermelon.
    [Show full text]