DOCSLIB.ORG

Pollen Morphology of Selected Bee Forage Plants

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pollen Morphology of Selected Bee Forage Plants View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ePrints@Bangalore University G.J.B.B., VOL.2 (1) 2013: 82-90 ISSN 2278 – 9103 POLLEN MORPHOLOGY OF SELECTED BEE FORAGE PLANTS Shubharani, R., Roopa, P. & Sivaram, V. Laboratory of Biodiversity and Apiculture, Department of Botany, Bangalore University, Bangalore-560056, India ABSTRACT Pollen taxonomy is the prerequisite to compare the pollen present in honey samples with special reference to melissopalynological investigation. There is a scope to prepare pollen reference slides of flowering plants visited by honeybees of different ecological regions. The present study was undertaken during March 2010 to June 2012 in Western Ghats of Karnataka. Sixty eight flowering plants visited by honeybees were collected from Western Ghats of Karnataka and pollen morphological studies have been carried out. Species belonging to family Astraceae pollen are spinolous spherical in shape. The different species in families Fabaceae has a great morphological diversity. They also have variation in symmetry, position and distribution of apertures, exine structure and sculpture of the pollen wall. The pollen grain of plants belonging to family Malvaceae is echinate. Species of family Myrtaceae pollen are colporate and prolate. KEY WORDS: Pollen morphology, Bee plants, pollen wall, exine structure, spinolous, echinate. INTRODUCTION Karnataka are Chamarajanagara, Mysore, Kodagu, Honeybees and flowering plants have been considered as Chikamaglur, Shimoga, Hassan, Dakshina kannada, Uttara an example for co-evolution and mutualism. Honeybees kannada, Dharwad and Belgaum. It has geographical area need flowering plants for nectar and pollen as source of of 44,870 sq meter and lies between 120.80’ and 160.14’ food and flowering plants need honeybees for pollination. North latitude and 740.08’ and 760.19’ East longitude Beekeeping is entirely depending on the types of (Sivaram, 1995). This region was selected for maximum flowering plants available in any given area. There is a utilization of flora by beekeepers and recognizes the major need to understand honeybee plant relationship to study pollen and nectar source to honeybees. The information on food preferences of honeybees and pollination bee plants, pollen morphology and types of pollen in this requirement. Pollen of various plants representing region is limited. The purpose of this study is to provide potential source of nectar and pollen for the honeybees is the reference information on nectar and pollen source for an important pre-requisite for the developing apiary honeybees and to evaluate the morphological difference in (Kalpana and Ramanujam 1997). Pollen from the different pollen grains of selected bee forage plants. flowers has specific shape, size and ornamentation. Microscopical analysis of pollen of plants forged by bees MATERIALS AND METHODS is an established method to determine the source of honey Field studies in the area. Earlier several studies on pollen morphology In the present investigation, the pollen morphology of 68 have been done worldwide (Raj 1969, Sowunmi 1973, plant species from 39 families of apiculture importance Tomb et. al., 1974, Nair and Kapoor 1974, Gill and has been identified and studied during March 2010 to June Chinnappa, 1982). Kral (1992) has made palynological 2012. A field survey in different places in Western Ghats investigation of forest trees in relation to forest history and of Karnataka was conducted in order to identify the natural mixture of tree species on the basis of their pollen potential zones for the beekeeping. The sample of ripe profile. Noor et al., (2004) has done the palynological pollen grains were collected from mature flower buds studies of cultivated plants of Rawalpindi, Pakistan. directly from the field after the plant has been confirmed Adekanmbi and Ogundipe (2006) described the pollen as bee plant by visual observation that bees are foraging morphological of 20 cultivated plants of Nigeria. Perveen on plant either for nectar or for pollen or both. The mature and Qaiser, 2009 and 2010) conducted the pollen studies pollen grains of the identified bee plant species are of the family Moringaceae and Berberidaceae. Several collected and preserved in 70% alcohol for further taxonomists identify the plant species on the basis of investigation. phenotypic character of plant. But now the pollen Preparation of pollen slides morphological studies can provide a basis for the The preserved material was prepared by acetolysis method identification of plant species. An interest in pollen according to Erdtman (1960) for light microscope, which morphology has increased its full application in involves the introduction of acetolysed mixture systematic, paleobotany and allergy has been recognized comprising acetic anhydride mixed with concentrated (Noor et al., (2004). Pollen study has significant sulphuric acid in the ratio 9:1. The tubes were immersed in application in recognition of bee plants. boiling water bath for 3-5 min, centrifuged and the Western Ghats of Karnataka has a great diversity of supernatant decanted. The residue was washed water and flowering plants and has good potential for commercial decanted, about few drops of glycerin was added and beekeeping. The area fall under Western Ghats in mounted on slide. The prepared slides were studied under 82 Pollen morphology of bee forage plants light microscope for morphological studies and species are herbs and 1 aquatic plant. The pollen photomicrograph of pollen grains was taken. morphology varies among different plant species; occur in varying shapes and forms. They also show variation in RESULTS AND DISCUSSION symmetry, exine structure and sculpture. Cassia sp., Data collected during the study is presented on Table 1. Euphorbia sp., Terminalia sp., Melastoma sp. and The information incorporates 68 species belonging to 39 Pongamia pinnata pollen are spherical, pollen of family families, useful as source of forage to honeybees. Malvaceae are echinate. Pollen of Anthurium sp., Information of flowering period and their economic Adhatoda vasica, Antigonon leptopus, Jasminum sp. and importance is also given. The forage source includes Punica granatum are oblate in shape. 39.7% are tree species, 32.3% are shrubs and 26.4% TABLE-1: Pollen type and its morphology Sr. Pollen type Plant name and Morphology Flowerin Forage No. Family name g period source 1. Acacia sp. Polyad type, individual (Fabaceae) cell sub-globose, in 9-12 Tree periphery and square in centre, polyads not in the form of pollinia, (grains group of 16) 2. Adhatoda vasica Monoporate, oblate, ( Acanthaceae) radial symmetry 1-12 Shrub 3. Agava sp. Colpate, striate surface, (Agavaceae) bilateral symmetry 1-12 Shrub 4. Ageratum conyzoides Prolate, spinolous, (Asteraceae) radial symmetry 1-12 Herb 5. Anthurium sp. Oblate, colpate, prolate, (Araceae) oralolongate, brevicolpi. 1-12 Herb bilateral symmetry 6. Antigonon leptopus Striated surface, exine (Polygonaceae) reticulate, oblate shape, 1-12 Shrub bilateral symmetry 7. Bauhinia purpurea Tri-periporate, prolate- (Fabaceae) spheroid, reticulate , 2-4 Tree ora- lolongate, bilateral symmetry 8. Bombax malabaricum Colporate, prolate, (Bombacaceae) per-oblate, 1-3 Tree bilateral symmetry 9. Butea monosperma Colporate,prolate, oblate- (Fabaceae) spheroid, obscure pattern, 1-5 Tree bilateral symmetry 83 G.J.B.B., VOL.2 (1) 2013: 82-90 ISSN 2278 – 9103 10. Caesalpinia pulcherrima 3-colporate, sub-oblate (Fabaceae) shape, bilateral symmetry 3-6 Tree 11. Calliandra portoricensis Polyad type, individual (Fabaceae) cell globose , prolate shape 4-6 Tree 12. Callistemon linearis Colporate, prolate, oblate- (Myrtaceae) spheroid, obscure pattern, 2-5 Tree bilateral symmetry 13. Cassia fistula Colporate, prolate, prolate- (Fabaceae) spheroid, punctitegillate, 3-8 Shrub bilateral symmetry 14. Chrysanthemum sp. Exine reticulate, porate, (Asteraceae) spheroid, spinolous, 1-12 Herb radial symmetry 15. Cocos nucifera 1-Sulcate, is reticulate (Arecaceae) type, monad, bilateral 1-12 Tree symmetry 16. Coffea sp. 3-colporate,oblate, exine (Rubiaceae) forming a ring, 3-4 Shrub bilateral symmetry 17. Commelina diffusa Shape elliptical, narrow (Commelinaceae) furrow on one (convex) 7-10 Herb side, bilateral symmetry 18. Coriandrum sativum 3-Colporate, prolate, per- (Apiaceae) prolate, bilateral symmetry 6-8 Herb 19. Croton sp. Inaperturate, retipilate, (Euphorbiaceae) radial symmetry, 1-12 Shrub clavateexine 20. Cucurbita pepo Porate, exine is (Cucurbitaceae) reticulate,or retipilate, 8-10 Shrub radial symmetry 84 Pollen morphology of bee forage plants 21. Cyperus sp. Aperture indistinct, pear (Cyperaceae) shaped,3-4 aperturoid 8-1 Herb areas, bilateral symmetry, 22. Datura arborea Colporate, prolate, oblate- (Solanaceae) spheroid, oralolongate, 1-12 Shrub brevicolpi. radial symmetry 23. Elaeocarpus 3-colporate, prolate to angustifolius prolate-spheroid exine 7-10 Tree (Elaeocarpaceae) obscure, bilateral symmetry 24. Eucalyptus globus Colporate, prolate, (Myrtaceae) oblate-spheroid, obscure 1-8 Tree pattern,parasyncoplate, bilateral symmetry 25. Euphorbia pulcherrima 3- Colporate, spheroid (Euphorbiaceae) shape, furrows indistinct, 11-1 Shrub reticulate, bilateral symmetry. 26. Eupatorium purpureum Porate, spheroid shape, (Asteraceae) spinolousexine, 9-3 Herb radial symmetry, 27. Gliricida sepium Monocolpate, exine (Fabaceae) obscure, sub-oblate, 1-12 Tree bilateral symmetry 28. Gomphrena globosa Pantoporae, spheroid,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stress Decreases Pollen Foraging Performance in Honeybees Célia Bordier1, Simon Klein2,3, Yves Le Conte1, Andrew B
    © 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2018) 221, jeb171470. doi:10.1242/jeb.171470 SHORT COMMUNICATION Stress decreases pollen foraging performance in honeybees Célia Bordier1, Simon Klein2,3, Yves Le Conte1, Andrew B. Barron3,* and Cédric Alaux1,*,‡ ABSTRACT depletion (Kralj and Fuchs, 2010; Alaux et al., 2014; Naug, 2014; Foraging in honeybees is energetically demanding. Here, we Wolf et al., 2014). Stressors may also affect forager decision- examined whether stressors, which generally increase metabolic making processes as a consequence of the energetic challenges of demands, can impair foraging performance. A controlled non- the stressor, in which case bees may show a preference for pathogenic stressor (immune challenge) resulted in a change in the carbohydrate-rich resources to supply their own energy needs. The foraging preferences of bees. It reduced pollen foraging and finding that the gene coding for the pheromone biosynthesis- increased the duration of trips in pollen foragers. Stress also activating neuropeptide, a neuropeptide known to be present at reduced the amount of octopamine in the brain of pollen foragers (a higher levels in nectar foragers than in pollen foragers (Brockmann biogenic amine involved in the regulation of foraging and flight et al., 2009), is over-expressed in parasitized bees (McDonnell et al., behaviour in insects). According to the literature, flight metabolic rate 2013) provides some indirect support for this hypothesis. Stress can is higher during pollen foraging than during nectar foraging, and decrease sucrose responsiveness (Pankiw and Page, 2003), which is nectar gives a higher energetic return relative to the foraging effort lower in nectar foragers than in pollen foragers (Pankiw and Page, when compared with pollen.
    [Show full text]
  • Colony Growth and Seasonal Management of Honey Bees
    Colony Growth and Seasonal Management of Honey Bees Management of honey bees varies based on whether Although honey is essential food for bees, colonies pollination or honey production is the primary objective. cannot grow without sufficient amounts of incoming A simple scheme for those interested in maximizing honey pollen. Pollen contains the essential amino acids, sterols, production can be a template for any beginning beekeeper. minerals, and vitamins that bee larvae need to grow into Managing honey bees involves seasonal manipulations adult honey bees. Bee colonies cannot grow without brood of hive space to provide room when necessary for the production, and brood production hinges on good-quality expanding brood-rearing area and for storage of surplus nutrition that comes from pollen. Hence, bee colonies grow honey. Good management includes reducing colony space largest during or just after periods of maximum numbers during periods of dearth of incoming food, preventing of blooming plants in the spring and autumn (Figure 1). swarming of bees, feeding food supplements to offset any These periods are called honey flows. shortcomings in winter stores or to help stimulate brood Blooming of food plants can be predicted by a crude production during critical periods of colony development, geographic rule of adding a 1-week delay in bloom for keeping young and good-quality queens in colonies, and every 200 miles or so northward in latitude. For example, if managing diseases and parasites. sumac is blooming heavily in southern Mississippi during the first week of May, a person living near the Mississippi- Basic Growth Cycle Tennessee border might expect sumac to bloom from the Good seasonal management begins with understand- third week of May into the beginning of June.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of China 12: 300–301. 2007. 2. BOMBAX Linnaeus, Sp. Pl. 1
    Flora of China 12: 300–301. 2007. 2. BOMBAX Linnaeus, Sp. Pl. 1: 511. 1753, nom. cons. 木棉属 mu mian shu Deciduous big trees; young trunk usually spiny. Leaf blade palmately compound; leaflets 5–9, sometimes petiolulate, with basal joint, margin entire. Flowers bisexual, solitary or fascicled, axillary or terminal. Flowers large, produced before leaf flush. Pedicel shorter than 10 cm. Bracteoles absent. Calyx tubular, campanulate, or cup-shaped, apex truncate to deeply lobed, sometimes with abaxial glands, leathery, falling with petals and stamens. Petals 5, usually red, sometimes yellow, orange, or white, obovate or obovate-lanceolate, asymmetrical, sometimes reflexed. Stamens 70–900, bases connate into short tube; filaments connate into 5–10 distinct phalanges, alternating with petals; anthers reniform. Ovary syncarpous, 5-locular; ovules many per locule; style filiform, longer than stamens; stigma stellately lobed. Capsule loculicidally dehiscent into 5 valves, valves woody or leathery, with silky wool inside. Seeds small, black, enclosed by wool. About 50 species: mostly in tropical America, also in tropical Africa, Asia, and Australasia; three species in China. 1a. Leaflets abaxially densely tomentose; petals white, ca. 4 cm ................................................................................ 3. B. cambodiense 1b. Leaflets abaxially glabrous or hairy only on veins; petals red or orange-red, 10–15 cm. 2a. Calyx 3.8–5 cm; petals adaxially glabrous; filaments linear; capsule 25–30 cm ..................................................... 1. B. insigne 2b. Calyx 2–3(–4.5) cm; petals adaxially stellate pilose; filaments thicker at base than apex; capsule 10–15 cm .......... 2. B. ceiba 1. Bombax insigne Wallich var. tenebrosum (Dunn) A. lobes 3–5, semi-orbicular, ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Pachira Aquatica, (Zapotón, Pumpo)
    How to Grow a Sacred Maya Flower Pachira aquatica, (Zapotón, Pumpo) Nicholas Hellmuth 1 Introduction: There are several thousand species of flowering plants in Guatemala. Actually there are several thousand flowering TREES in Guatemala. If you count all the bushes, shrubs, and vines, you add thousands more. Then count the grasses, water plants; that’s a lot of flowers to look at. Actually, if you count the orchids in Guatemala you would run out of numbers! Yet out of these “zillions” of beautiful tropical flowers, the Classic Maya, for thousands of years, picture less than 30 different species. It would be a challenge to find representations of a significant number of orchids in Maya art: strange, since they are beautiful, and there are orchids throughout the Maya homeland as well as in the Olmec homeland, plus orchids are common in the Izapa area of proto_Maya habitation in Chiapas. Yet other flowers are pictured in Maya yart, yet in the first 150 years of Maya studies, only one single solitary flower species was focused on: the sacred water lily flower! (I know this focus well, I wrote my PhD dissertation featuring this water lily). But already already 47 years ago, I had noticed flowers on Maya vases: there were several vases that I discovered myself in a royal burial at Tikal that pictured stylized 4-petaled flowers (Burial 196, the Tomb of the Jade Jaguar). Still, if you have XY-thousand flowers blooming around you, why did the Maya picture less than 30? In other words, why did the Maya select the water lily as their #1 flower? I know most of the reasons, but the point is, the Maya had XY-thousand.
    [Show full text]
  • Establishing a Honey Bee Colony
    ESTABLISHING A HONEY BEE COLONY SUCCESS IN THE FIRST YEAR Meghan Milbrath, April 2016 Honey bees colonies should live from year to year in most climates where they are kept. Just like other perennials, new honey bee colonies require different care when they are started and their management changes as they become older and more established. In beekeeping, an established colony is one that has survived a winter with a queen and cluster of bees, will generally reproduce (swarm) in spring, have sufficient comb built, and has enough bees to ensure survival (if it is kept free from environmental threats and disease). A new colony is started by one of four ways 1) purchased packages, 2) purchased nucs, 3) caught swarms, and 4) splits. In all of these cases, the population will be much smaller, will not have the same ratio of all ages of bees, and will not function like a fully operating colony. A new honey bee colony has one goal - grow large enough to have enough food to survive its first winter. In Northern climates, where the season is shorter, new colonies often cannot become fully established by the time winter sets in without extra help from the beekeeper. Picture a new colony like a baby animal, or a new fruit tree. While an older animal may be able to fend for itself, a young one cannot. And while an older fruit tree will bear fruit, a young seedling will put its energy into root production and growth. Likewise, a new honey bee colony will need more support while it is small, and it will likely not provide a crop during its first year.
    [Show full text]
  • Silk Cotton Vs. Bombax Vs. Banyan
    Ceiba pentandra Kopok tree, Silk-cotton tree Ta Prohm, Cambodia By Isabel Zucker Largest known specimen in Lal Bagh Gardens in Bangalore, India. http://scienceray.com/biology/botany/amazing-trees-from-around-the-world-the-seven-wonder-trees/ Ceiba pentandra Taxonomy • Family: Malvaceae • Sub family: Bombacaceae -Bombax spp. in same family - much online confusion as to which tree is primarily in Ta Praham, Cambodia. • Fig(Moraceae), banyan and kapok trees in Ta Praham • Often referred to as a banyan tree, which is quite confusing. Distribution • Originated in the American tropics, natural and human distribution. • Africa, Asia. – Especially Indonesia and Thailand • Indian ocean islands • Ornamental shade tree • Zone – Humid areas, rainforest, dry areas – Mean annual precipitation 60-224 inches per year – Temperatures ranging from 73-80 unaffected by frost – Elevation from 0-4,500 feet – Dry season ranging from 0-6 months Characteristics • Rapidly growing, deciduous • Reaches height up to 200 feet • Can grow 13 feet per year • Diameter up to 9 feet above buttress – Buttress can extend 10 feet from the trunk and be 10 feet tall • large umbrella-shaped canopies emerge above the forest canopy • http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/caribarch/ceiba.htm • Home to many animals – Birds, frogs, insects – Flowers open in the evening, pollinated by bats • Epiphytes grow in branches • Compound leaves with 5-8 lance- shaped leaflets 3-8 inches long • Dense clusters of whitish to pink flowers December to February – 3-6 inch long, elliptical fruits. – Seeds of fruit surrounded by dense, cottony fibers. – Fibers almost pure cellulose, buoyant, impervious to water, low thermal conductivity, cannot be spun.
    [Show full text]
  • FORAGE LEGUMES Clovers, Birdsfoot Trefoil, Cicer Milkvetch, Crownvetch and Alfalfa
    FORAGE LEGUMES Clovers, Birdsfoot Trefoil, Cicer Milkvetch, Crownvetch and Alfalfa Craig C. Sheaffer Nancy J. Ehlke Kenneth A. Albrecht Jacob M. Jungers Minnesota Agricultural Jared J. Goplen Experiment Station Station Bulletin 608-2018 Forage Legumes Clovers, Birdsfoot Trefoil, Cicer Milkvetch, Crownvetch and Alfalfa Craig C. Sheaffer Nancy J. Ehlke Kenneth A. Albrecht Jacob M. Jungers Jared J. Goplen Station Bulletin 608-2018 Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station University of Minnesota Saint Paul, Minnesota The University of Minnesota shall provide equal access to and opportunity in its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, gender, age, marital status, disability, public assistance status, veteran status, sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. Editors Craig Sheaffer, Nancy Ehlke, and Jacob Jungers are agronomists with the University of Minnesota Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics in the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences, Saint Paul, Minnesota. Jared Goplen is an Extension Educator in Crops for University of Minnesota Extension. Kenneth Albrecht is an agronomist with the University of Wisonsin’s Department of Agronomy. Acknowledgments This publication is a revision of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 597-1993, Forage Le- gumes, orginally issued in 1993 and then updated in 2003 and then again in 2018. The editors of this third edition gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the coauthors of the original publication: Harlan Ford, Neal Martin, Russell Mathison, David Rabas and Douglas Swanson. Publications editing, design and development for the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station is by Shelly Gustafson, experiment station communications specialist. Photos are by Dave Hansen or Don Breneman.
    [Show full text]
  • Teen Facilitator Guide Created By
    2016 Teen Facilitator Guide Created by: Robert L. Horton, PhD, Agri-Science Professor, College of Food, Agriculture, and Environmental Sciences, The Ohio State University Patty House, MS, County Extension Educator 3, College of Food, Agriculture, and Environmental Sciences, The Ohio State University Denise Ellsworth, Program Director, Honey Bee and Native Pollinator Education, The Ohio State University Denise M. Johnson, Program Manager, Ohio State University Extension Master Gardener Volunteer Program, The Ohio State University Margaret Duden, SimplySmart Education Specialists Liz Kasper, Pete Sandvik, Northern Design Group The 4-H Ag Innovators Experience Honey Bee Challenge focuses on a critical component—honey bees—to growing food and feeding the world. Approximately one in every three bites we eat is the result of these pollinators at work. Apples, pumpkins, strawberries, alfalfa, sunflowers, oranges, buckwheat, and almonds are just some of the crops that rely on honey bee pollination. As the Teen Facilitator for this activity, you will help youth learn that: • Honey bees and other pollinators are essential contributors to growing food and feeding the world. • Honey bees utilize a combination of natural and agricultural habitats to maintain healthy hives. • Preserving and maintaining the natural foraging habitats of honey bees is important. • Commercial beekeepers transport honey bees all across the country to boost crop yield, since there is not enough managed honeybees or native pollinators to maximize agricultural production. • Youth can contribute to honey bee health in their own communities. The 4-H Ag Innovators Honey Bee Challenge is an ideal activity for 3rd to 8th grade youth at summer reading programs, summer camps, summer childcare settings, festivals, and fairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Press Vol. 15, No. 3
    Special Symposium Issue continued on page 7 Department of Botany & the U.S. National Herbarium The Plant Press New Series - Vol. 15 - No. 3 July-September 2012 Botany Profile Letting the Phylogeny Genie Out of the Bottle By David Erickson n April 20-21, the Department of marine diversity through a network of phylogenies, particularly as the volume Botany at the Smithsonian Insti- marine research stations. of data vastly expands in the genomic Otution convened the 10th Smith- Following Coddington’s whirlwind era. This is in contrast to methods that sonian Botanical Symposium, hosted by tour of the take a the Department of Botany in collabo- diversity of “total data” ration with the United States Botanic research at approach Garden. This year’s symposium titled the insti- and hope “Transforming 21st Century Compara- tution, the correct tive Biology using Evolutionary Trees,” Lawrence phylo- examined the development and applica- Dorr then genetic tion of phylogenetic methods in light of introduced signal is the massive advances in sequencing and the recipient of the 10th José Cuatrecasas contained within as a kind of average genomic technology. Warren Wagner, Medal for Excellence in Tropical Botany. among the data. Edwards’ presentation Chair of the Department of Botany, This year’s winner was Walter S. Judd, served as the perfect introduction to get opened the symposium by welcoming a Professor of Botany at the University the audience thinking about how we speakers and guests. He then provided of Florida at Gainesville. Judd is one of build phylogenies, and how thinking an introduction into the Department of the world’s experts in the Ericaceae, has carefully about data analysis remains a Botany and background on symposium a strong interest in the Melastomataceae, critical question as we may be tempted subjects in the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Forage for Native Bee Crop Pollinators
    General —7 National Agroforestry Center AGROFORESTRY NOTES AF Note —33 August 2006 Improving Forage For Native Bee Crop Pollinators Introduction Agroforestry practices can provide essential habitat for bees, our most important crop polli- nators. The European honey bee receives most of the credit for crop pollination, but the num- ber of managed honey bee hives is half of what it was in the 1950s; and this number con- tinues to decline because of disease and the immigration of aggressive races of honey bees. Native bees, however, significantly contribute to crop pollination – and, in some cases, pro- vide all of the pollination. An Osmia aglaia female pollinates a black In order to support the native bee community, a raspberry flower. Photo courtesy Xerces Society wealth of flowers is necessary. Unfortunately, For Invertebrate Conservation. heavily managed farm landscapes often lack the diversity and abundance of flowers that native bees require. By providing abundant and diverse pollen and nectar sources, a diverse community of native bee species will increase, adjacent crops may yield more, growers could rely less on imported European honey bees, and farm biodiversity and other wildlife species will benefit. This Agroforestry Note discusses how to maximize the ability of an agroforestry practice to support crop-pollinating bees, including a step-by-step method for planning forage enhancements. Other flo- ral visitors, like butterflies, do not pollinate crops, but will also benefit from the techniques below. Step 1: Identify Existing pollen and nectar sources can often be found near fencerows or hedgerows, riparian buffers, and protect bee other natural areas, or any place on or around the site where a variety of plants (weeds or otherwise) forage already in grow.
    [Show full text]
  • Forage and Habitat for Pollinators in the Northern Great Plains—Implications for U.S
    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forage and Habitat for Pollinators in the Northern Great Plains—Implications for U.S. Department of Agriculture Conservation Programs Open-File Report 2020–1037 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey A B C D E F G H I Cover. A, Bumble bee (Bombus sp.) visiting a locowood flower. Photograph by Stacy Simanonok, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). B, Honey bee (Apis mellifera) foraging on yellow sweetclover (Melilotus officinalis). Photograph by Sarah Scott, USGS. C, Two researchers working on honey bee colonies in a North Dakota apiary. Photograph by Elyssa McCulloch, USGS. D, Purple prairie clover (Dalea purpurea) against a backdrop of grass. Photograph by Stacy Simanonok, USGS. E, Conservation Reserve Program pollinator habitat in bloom. Photograph by Clint Otto, USGS. F, Prairie onion (Allium stellatum) along the slope of a North Dakota hillside. Photograph by Mary Powley, USGS. G, A researcher assesses a honey bee colony in North Dakota. Photograph by Katie Lee, University of Minnesota. H, Honey bee foraging on alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Photograph by Savannah Adams, USGS. I, Bee resting on woolly paperflower (Psilostrophe tagetina). Photograph by Angela Begosh, Oklahoma State University. Front cover background and back cover, A USGS research transect on a North Dakota Conservation Reserve Program field in full bloom. Photograph by Mary Powley, USGS. Forage and Habitat for Pollinators in the Northern Great Plains—Implications for U.S. Department of Agriculture Conservation Programs By Clint R.V. Otto, Autumn Smart, Robert S. Cornman, Michael Simanonok, and Deborah D. Iwanowicz Prepared in cooperation with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Planting Forage for Honey Bees in Canada a Guide for Farmers, Land
    Planting Forage for Honey Bees in Canada A guide for farmers, land managers, and gardeners Planting Guide Guide Planting Planting This guide entitled Planting Forage for Honey Bees in Canada: A guide for farmers, land managers, and gardeners, was produced by Pollinator Partnership Canada. The guide was commissioned for discussion purposes by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) on behalf of the Bee Health Roundtable, an industry-government forum. The content of this guide does not necessarily reflect the opinions or interests of the entire Bee Health Roundtable membership or AAFC, nor does it necessarily reflect the opinions or interests of all parties interviewed during the researching of this guide. The recommendations resulting from the guide are not binding on any participant of the VCRTs or AAFC. © HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA 2017 as represented by the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food - Department of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada 2 Planting Forage for Honey Bees in Canada: A guide for farmers, land managers, and gardeners Why Support Honey Bees? _________________________________4 About this Guide ___________________________________________5 Honey Bees _______________________________________________6 Where to Put Honey Bee Forage _____________________________8 How to Preserve, Enhance, Maintain __________________________9 Plant Selection and Design _________________________________11 Site Preparation and Invasive Species ______________________ 12 Integrative Vegetation Management ________________________ 13
    [Show full text]