DOCSLIB.ORG

Learning Management System Technologies and Software Solutions for Online Teaching: Tools and Applications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Learning Management System Technologies and Software Solutions for Online Teaching: Tools and Applications Learning Management System Technologies and Software Solutions for Online Teaching: Tools and Applications Yefim Kats Ellis University, USA & Rivier College, USA InformatIon scIence reference Hershey • New York Director of Editorial Content: Kristin Klinger Director of Book Publications: Julia Mosemann Acquisitions Editor: Lindsay Johnston Development Editor: Elizabeth Ardner Typesetter: Gregory Snader Production Editor: Jamie Snavely Cover Design: Lisa Tosheff Printed at: Yurchak Printing Inc. Published in the United States of America by Information Science Reference (an imprint of IGI Global) 701 E. Chocolate Avenue Hershey PA 17033 Tel: 717-533-8845 Fax: 717-533-8661 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: http://www.igi-global.com/reference Copyright © 2010 by IGI Global. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or distributed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, without written permission from the publisher. Product or company names used in this set are for identification purposes only. Inclusion of the names of the products or companies does not indicate a claim of ownership by IGI Global of the trademark or registered trademark. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Learning management system technologies and software solutions for online teaching : tools and applications / Yefim Kats, editor. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. Summary: "This book gives a general coverage of learning management systems followed by a comparative analysis of the particular LMS products, review of technologies supporting different aspect of educational process, and, the best practices and methodologies for LMS-supported course delivery"--Provided by publisher. ISBN 978-1-61520-853-1 (hardcover) -- ISBN 978-1-61520-854-8 (ebook) 1. Internet in higher education. 2. Education, Higher--Computer-assisted instruction. 3. Organizational effectiveness. 4. System analysis. I. Kats, Yefim. LB2395.7.L43 2010 371.33'44678071--dc22 2009040623 British Cataloguing in Publication Data A Cataloguing in Publication record for this book is available from the British Library. All work contributed to this book is new, previously-unpublished material. The views expressed in this book are those of the authors, but not necessarily of the publisher. In memory of my parents, Pinhas and Mura To Baoqing Editorial Advisory Board Daniel Ferens, Data and Analysis Center for Software, ITT IS, USA James Geller, New Jersey Institute of Technology, USA Wolfgang Hommel, Leibniz Supercomputing Centre, Germany Antony Pina, The Sullivan University System, USA Vladimir Riabov, Rivier College, USA Kate Kouprianova, Strayer University, USA Judy Van Biljon, University of South Africa, South Africa Tobias Zimmerman, Zentrum für Hochschuldidaktik und Erwachsenenbildung, Switzerland List of Reviewers Larbi Esmahi, Athabasca University, Canada Linzi Kemp, American University of Sharjah, UAE Patricia McGee, The University of Texas at San Antonio, USA Geraldine Torrisi-Steele, Logan Campus, Griffith University, Australia Adam Westerski, Ciudad Universitaria, Spain Table of Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................................xvi Acknowledgment ..............................................................................................................................xxiii Section 1 Learning Management Systems: An Overview Chapter 1 An Overview of Learning Management Systems ...................................................................................1 Anthony A. Piña, Sullivan University System, USA Chapter 2 What is an E-Learning Platform? ......................................................................................................... 20 Michael Piotrowski, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Switzerland Chapter 3 Security and Privacy Management for Learning Management Systems ..............................................37 Wolfgang Hommel, Leibniz Supercomputing Centre, Germany Section 2 Selecting a Suitable Learning Management System: Challenges and Solutions Chapter 4 Choosing the Appropriate E-Learning System for a University ...........................................................57 Cerstin Mahlow, School of Social Work, University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland, Switzerland Chapter 5 Technology Enhanced Distance Learning Utilising Sakai CLE and Adobe Connect Pro ....................81 Juley McGourty, University of Limerick, Ireland Angelica Risquez, University of Limerick, Ireland Chapter 6 Preparing Faculty for a Learning Management System Transition .................................................... 105 Danilo M. Baylen, University of West Georgia, USA Mary Hancock, University of West Georgia, USA Carol M. Mullen, University of West Georgia, USA Mary Angela Coleman, University System of Georgia, USA Section 3 Supporting Technologies for Student Tracking, Evaluation, and Synchronous Course Delivery Chapter 7 Plagiarism Detection Tools in Learning Management Systems ......................................................... 120 Sergey Butakov, Solbridge International School of Business, South Korea Vladislav Shcherbinin, American University of Nigeria, Nigeria Chapter 8 Using a Learning Management System to Facilitate Learning Outcomes Assessment ......................138 Steven F. Tello, University of Massachusetts Lowell, USA Luvai Motiwalla, University of Massachusetts Lowell, USA Chapter 9 eUreka: A Campus-Wide Project Work Management System to Support Constructivism, Reflection and Collaborative Learning ...............................................................................................157 Daniel T.H. Tan, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Adrian D.H. Lu, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Sheryl E. Wong, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Chapter 10 Improving the Tracking of Student Participation and Effort in Online Learning ...............................173 Ian Douglas, Florida State University, USA Chapter 11 Open Synchronicity for Online Class Support ....................................................................................187 Clark Shah-Nelson, SUNY Delhi, USA Chapter 12 Leading Toward Improved Collaboration ...........................................................................................204 Vickie Cook, Greenville College, USA Kara L. McElwrath, University of Illinois Springfield, USA Chapter 13 Integrating New Open Source Assessment Tools into dotLearn LMS ............................................... 219 Paloma Moreno-Clari, University of Valencia, Spain Esteban Sanchis-Kilders, University of Valencia, Spain Section 4 Learning Management Systems and Best Practices in Online Education Chapter 14 Improving Hybrid and Online Course Delivery Emerging Technologies .......................................... 239 Nory B. Jones, University of Maine Business School, USA Christian Graham, University of Maine Business School, USA Chapter 15 Developing Student Portfolios for Outcomes-Based Assessment in Personalized Instruction .......... 259 Kam Hou Vat, University of Macau, Macau Chapter 16 Best Practices for Teaching and Designing a Pure Online Science Classroom .................................. 291 Ricardo Javier Rademacher Mena, Futur-E-Scape, LLC, USA Chapter 17 Hybrid Dialog: Dialogic Learning in Large Lecture Classes ............................................................. 314 Tobias Zimmermann, University of Zurich, Switzerland Karen-Lynn Bucher, University of Zurich, Switzerland Daniel Hurtado, University of Zurich, Switzerland Chapter 18 Software Tools and Virtual Labs in Online Computer-Science Classes ............................................. 332 Vladimir V. Riabov, Rivier College, USA Bryan J. Higgs, Milford, NH, USA Chapter 19 Managing Case-Based Learning with Interactive Case Study Libraries ............................................ 351 Hao Jiang, Pennsylvania State University, USA Craig Ganoe, Pennsylvania State University, USA John M. Carroll, Pennsylvania State University, USA Chapter 20 Experiences and Opinions of Online Learners: What Fosters Successful Learning........................... 372 Michael F. Beaudoin, University of New England, USA Chapter 21 Distance Learning Courses: A Survey of Activities and Assignments ............................................... 394 Kelley Walters, Northcentral University, USA Melanie Shaw, Northcentral University, USA David Long, University of Florida, USA Compilation of References ............................................................................................................... 410 About the Contributors ....................................................................................................................445 Index ...................................................................................................................................................454 Detailed Table of Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................................xvi Acknowledgment ..............................................................................................................................xxiii Section 1 Learning Management Systems: An Overview Chapter 1 An Overview of Learning Management Systems ...................................................................................1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Is the Purpose of Educational Software
    What is the purpose of educational software What is the purpose of educational software do? What they are mutually educational software, science, economy, solve problems typical of companies in various fields such as business people, learning to use to simplify the presentation of the subject? This is entered, results will help you judge, get feedback. Compared to computer games and fun skill to learn, is much greater emphasis on some educational software. And uniqueness of what is educational software? This is it, this software is created, it is created by experts can be considered as intended audience, be equal to traditional classroom learning. If it's an opportunity to learn, this software is in the four walls of the classroom, lessons must be equivalent to the guidance of competent instructors. The advantage of educational software, enter college have to worry about the reputed or about finding good teachers is that no, it can easily be obtained easily and distance education. Given in the virtual classroom‐formatted computer software utilizing the whole training course known as Shirabasutopikku courseware. These are kits for teachers and trainers. Educational software, as do traditional teaching methods in the classroom? Yes, they are also white board is used to teach computer or network. Such software has been referred to as classroom management. Another reference software designed by professionals and ordinary dictionary or encyclopedia. One of the software reference is Wikipedia. What is educational software for children that like? It has been designed using a mixed hardware platform and custom. Rather than a modern educational software, and servers based on built‐in pop‐ups on a single computer.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT to the UTAH LEGISLATURE Best Practices In
    REPORT TO THE UTAH LEGISLATURE Number 2005-04 Best Practices in Using Technology in Public Education February 2005 Review Performed by: Manager John M. Schaff Supervisor Maria Stahla Staff Kade Minchey David Gibson -1- Technology Deployment and Use Varies by School The Legislative Audit Subcommittee requested a review of how technology is being used to improve public education, whether there is sufficient training and support for teachers and students, and whether schools are maximizing the technology that has been purchased. Much has been accomplished to put technology into Utah’s schools to improve the education of students. Most teachers have personal computers, all schools have some personal computers for student use, and most schools have some computers connected to the Internet. The amount, age, accessibility and use of computers varies greatly, however, by district and school. Although much has been accomplished, much remains to be done including upgrading and replacing outdated technology, providing the professional development needed to enable educators to use technology more effectively in the classroom and providing the technical support to maintain the systems. Although questions still remain about how best to use technology to improve the education of students, many believe it plays an important role. While it is difficult to isolate the effects of technology alone, many administrators see positive academic effects of the use of computers, connections to the Internet, and various software programs in their schools. Each school district determines how much to invest in technology to achieve its educational goals and how fast to deploy the technology infrastructure. School districts have local boards that have broad authority to set their education policies and differing funding capabilities to finance their technology programs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reference Architecture for Web Servers
    A Reference Architecture for Web Servers Ahmed E. Hassan and Richard C. Holt Software Architecture Group (SWAG) Dept. of Computer Science University of Waterloo Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1 CANADA +1 (519) 888-4567 x 4671 {aeehassa, holt}@plg.uwaterloo.ca ABSTRACT document increases with the size and the complexity of the software system. Recently, a number of tools have A reference software architecture for a domain defines been developed to decrease this cost by helping to ex- the fundamental components of the domain and the tract the architecture of a software system [7, 16, 20, relations between them. Research has shown the bene- 21]. Using these tools, reverse engineering researchers fits of having a reference architecture for product de- have developed semi-automated processes to extract the velopment, software reuse, and maintenance. Many product’s architecture from available artifacts such as mature domains, such as compilers and operating sys- the product's source code and any available documenta- tems, have well-known reference architectures. tion. In this paper, we present a process to derive a reference The reference architecture [4] for a domain is an archi- architecture for a domain. We used this process to de- tecture template for all the software systems in the do- rive a reference architecture for web servers, which is a main. It defines the fundamental components of the relatively new domain. The paper presents the map- domain and the relations between these components. ping of this reference architecture to the architectures of The architecture for a particular product is an instance three open source web servers: Apache (80KLOC), of the reference architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Server: Apache
    Modern Trends in Network Fingerprinting SecTor [11.21.07] Jay Graver Ryan Poppa // Fingerprinting Topics Why, What, Who & How? Tools in action Why Tools Break Tools EOL New Approaches New Tool // Why Fingerprint? WhiteHat needs accurate identification of hosts in a PenTest report BlackHat reconnaissance SysAdmins track down and identify new services or hosts when they appear on their network // What is a Fingerprint? Looking at something common … 192.168.2.187:8004 192.168.2.187 [152] 48 54 54 50 2f 31 2e 31 20 32 30 30 20 4f 4b 0d HTTP/1.1 200 OK. 0a 43 6f 6e 6e 65 63 74 69 6f 6e 3a 20 63 6c 6f .Connection: clo 73 65 0d 0a 41 6c 6c 6f 77 3a 20 4f 50 54 49 4f se..Allow: OPTIO 4e 53 2c 20 47 45 54 2c 20 48 45 41 44 2c 20 50 NS, GET, HEAD, P 4f 53 54 0d 0a 43 6f 6e 74 65 6e 74 2d 4c 65 6e OST..Content‐Len 67 74 68 3a 20 30 0d 0a 44 61 74 65 3a 20 46 72 gth: 0..Date: Fr 69 2c 20 30 32 20 4e 6f 76 20 32 30 30 37 20 32 i, 02 Nov 2007 2 32 3a 32 35 3a 31 38 20 47 4d 54 0d 0a 53 65 72 2:25:18 GMT..Ser 76 65 72 3a 20 6c 69 67 68 74 74 70 64 2f 31 2e ver: lighttpd/1. 34 2e 31 35 0d 0a 0d 0a 4.15...
    [Show full text]
  • Next Generation Web Scanning Presentation
    Next generation web scanning New Zealand: A case study First presented at KIWICON III 2009 By Andrew Horton aka urbanadventurer NZ Web Recon Goal: To scan all of New Zealand's web-space to see what's there. Requirements: – Targets – Scanning – Analysis Sounds easy, right? urbanadventurer (Andrew Horton) www.morningstarsecurity.com Targets urbanadventurer (Andrew Horton) www.morningstarsecurity.com Targets What does 'NZ web-space' mean? It could mean: •Geographically within NZ regardless of the TLD •The .nz TLD hosted anywhere •All of the above For this scan it means, IPs geographically within NZ urbanadventurer (Andrew Horton) www.morningstarsecurity.com Finding Targets We need creative methods to find targets urbanadventurer (Andrew Horton) www.morningstarsecurity.com DNS Zone Transfer urbanadventurer (Andrew Horton) www.morningstarsecurity.com Find IP addresses on IRC and by resolving lots of NZ websites 58.*.*.* 60.*.*.* 65.*.*.* 91.*.*.* 110.*.*.* 111.*.*.* 113.*.*.* 114.*.*.* 115.*.*.* 116.*.*.* 117.*.*.* 118.*.*.* 119.*.*.* 120.*.*.* 121.*.*.* 122.*.*.* 123.*.*.* 124.*.*.* 125.*.*.* 130.*.*.* 131.*.*.* 132.*.*.* 138.*.*.* 139.*.*.* 143.*.*.* 144.*.*.* 146.*.*.* 150.*.*.* 153.*.*.* 156.*.*.* 161.*.*.* 162.*.*.* 163.*.*.* 165.*.*.* 166.*.*.* 167.*.*.* 192.*.*.* 198.*.*.* 202.*.*.* 203.*.*.* 210.*.*.* 218.*.*.* 219.*.*.* 222.*.*.* 729,580,500 IPs. More than we want to try. urbanadventurer (Andrew Horton) www.morningstarsecurity.com IP address blocks in the IANA IPv4 Address Space Registry Prefix Designation Date Whois Status [1] -----
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Distance Learning and Learning Management Systems
    Chapter 1 A Review of Distance Learning and Learning Management Systems Mümine Kaya Keleş and Selma Ayşe Özel Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/65222 Abstract In recent years, rapid developments in technology and the web have led to many changes in education. One of the most important changes in education is in the form of distance learning. Distance learning, which is used to define education where educators and learners are physically separated, is not a new concept; however, emerging technologies and the web allow web‐based distance learning and therefore increase its popularity. As a result of these developments, many universities have started to use web‐based distance learning systems to provide flexible education that is independent of time and place. In this chapter, we review all popular, widely used, and well‐known learning management systems and include detailed comparison of some of these systems to allow institutions to choose the right system for their distance education activities. Keywords: distance learning, literature review, educational research, learning manage- ment systems, Moodle 1. Introduction Distance education, which is now also referred to as distance learning or e‐learning, has existed for centuries. Although as Keegan says “the ideas surrounding the educational endeavor are somewhat similar” [1], it is not easy to find a single definition of distance education. While according to North [2], a few definitions even look to define it in terms of a single technology, according to long‐distance teaching [3], others display distance education simply as a recent development of the class into a remote location [4].
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Kodu's Case
    International Journal of Education (IJE) Vol.8, No.3, September 2020 EDUCATIONAL DIGITAL GAMES AS LEARNING TOOLS: MICROSOFT KODU'S CASE Christos Lalos1 and Ilektra Skarpa2 1IT Educator, PhD Candidate at University of Alicante in Spain 2Primary School Teacher, PhD Candidate at University of Murcia in Spain ABSTRACT The virtual environments of electronic games and, in general, digital media engagement undoubtedly attract the interest of young people in your days. On the other hand, students in schools seem to enjoy the traditional educational process. Students, therefore, need to be motivated to participate in school lessons, and a way to achieve this, is to use new digital media that are considered particularly popular with young people. The main objective of the project is to propose a didactic approach to achieving some of the objectives of the courses in the Primary School. In particular, an educational game is presented and developed as an example, with the help of Microsoft Kodu digital software, and it is recorded how it works as a learning tool. KEYWORDS Electronic communities, digital game, educational software, Microsoft Kodu 1. INTRODUCTION In 2009, Microsoft introduced a tool that anyone could use to easily and quickly program their own simple game. Who does not remember Sparrow, an 11-year-old girl who in front of the astonished eyes of the public, made in a few minutes a simple game that she could play with the manager of Microsoft? So according to the description of the title by the company itself, it is more of a programming language that uses the gamepad to enter commands, than a game in which users create tracks and content.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Learning Management Systems
    Open Source Learning Management Systems Emerging open source LMS markets Recommended LMS for each market Getting off on the right foot By Mark Aberdour Epic Technical Producer, Epic 52 Old Steine Brighton, BN1 1NH United Kingdom [email protected] www.epic.co.uk t: +44 (0) 1273 728686 f: +44 (0) 1273 821567 All rights reserved. You agree that by downloading and accessing this publication that no part of it maybe reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of Epic. Full acknowledgement of author and source must be given. ©2007 Epic Reproduction without written permission is strictly forbidden - 2 - An Epic White Paper Contents Executive summary 4 A changing market 4 The oppor tunity for Open Source 5 Emerging open source LMS markets 6 Large enterprise 6 Small and medium sized business (SMB) 6 Government and public sector 7 Primary and secondary education 7 Rapid rollout 8 Market feature matrix 8 The open source landscape 10 Benefits of Open Source 10 Risks of Open Source 11 Myths of Open Source 12 Selecting an open source LMS 13 Market recommendations 15 Large enterprise 15 Small and medium sized business 17 Government and public sector 19 Primary and secondary education 21 Rapid rollout 23 A detailed look at each LMS 24 Atutor 24 DotLRN 25 Ilias 26 Moodle 27 Sakai 28 Getting off on the right foot 30 Appendix A: Active open source LMS projects 32 References 33 Other Epic e-learning white papers 35 Epic Thinking 37 Epic Arena 38 ©2007 Epic Reproduction without written permission is strictly forbidden - 3 - An Epic White Paper Executive summary If you thought that “Open source learning management system (LMS) equals Moodle”, then think again.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison and Evaluation of Open Source Learning Managment Systems
    Itmazi, Jamil, Gea, M. M., Paderewski, P. and Gutiérrez, F.L. 2005. A Comparison and evaluation OF Open source learning managment systems. IADIS International Conference - Applied Computing 2005. Algarve, Portugal. 22-25 Feb. http://www.iadis.net/dl/Search_list_open.asp?code=1189 http://www-etsi2.ugr.es/usuarios/jamil/Prest_IADIS.pdf A COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF OPEN SOURCE LEARNING MANAGMENT SYSTEMS Jamil Ahmad Itmazi PhD. Student Computer Science Department, Granada University, Spain [email protected] Gea, M. M., Paderewski, P. and Gutiérrez, F.L Computer Science Department ETSI, Granada University, Spain [email protected] ABSTRACT The eLearning is a new modern tool of current learning system; it is becoming so important of the learning of the universities. The core of eLearning solutions is LMS or CMS (learning/course management systems), which help the university to automates the managing of learning events. Some of LMS are commercial Software, while others are free Open-Source LMS. The universities give more attention to OS-LMS, which are becoming very interesting of the eLearning landscape, even it are competing other proprietary software. In fact, studying and analyzing LMS´s is not easy; because the serious studies that made evaluation and comparison of the LMS are not sufficient, especially the open-source LMS, which did not take a good attention in those studies, so we emphasis the necessity of more analysis and study of LMS´s which involve OS-LMS and we try to contribute with this article. In this article, we make an introduction of LMS, listing some of them, choosing two OS-LMS (Moodle and Ilias) to study and evaluate then we start the comparison and evaluation to every package with introduction, features, different views and weaknesses (suggests to improve it).
    [Show full text]
  • Educational Software - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Page 1 of 8
    Educational software - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Page 1 of 8 Educational software From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia See also: List of educational software Educational software is computer software, the primary purpose of which is teaching or self-learning. Contents ■ 1 History ■ 1.1 Early History, 1940s - 1970s ■ 1.2 History 1970s – 1980s ■ 1.3 History 1990s ■ 2 Major types of educational software ■ 2.1 Children's learning and home learning ■ 2.2 Courseware ■ 2.3 Classroom aids ■ 2.4 Assessment software ■ 2.5 Edutainment ■ 2.6 Reference software ■ 2.7 Educational software on custom platforms ■ 2.8 Computer games with learning value ■ 2.9 Software in corporate training and tertiary education ■ 2.10 Software for specific educational purposes ■ 2.11 Operating systems for education ■ 3 Selected reports and academic articles ■ 4 Products and suppliers ■ 5 See also ■ 6 References ■ 7 External links History Early History, 1940s - 1970s The use of computer hardware and software in education and training dates to the early 1940s, when American researchers developed flight simulators which used analog computers to generate simulated onboard instrument data. One such system was the type19 synthetic radar trainer, built in 1943. From these early attempts in the WWII era through the mid 1970s, educational software was directly tied to the hardware, usually mainframe computers, on which it ran. Pioneering educational computer systems in this era included the PLATO system (1960), developed at the University of Illinois, and TICCIT (1969). In 1963, IBM had established a partnership with Stanford University's Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences (IMSSS), directed by Patrick Suppes, to develop the first comprehensive CAI elementary school curriculum which was implemented on a large scale in schools in both California and Mississippi.[1] In 1967 Computer Curriculum Corporation (CCC, now Pearson Education Technologies[2]) was formed to market to schools the materials developed through the IBM partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Available Elearning Platforms (Focusing on Freeware)
    Overview of available eLearning Platforms (focusing on freeware) Work Package 4 of the Project Blended Learning Quality-Concepts Optimized for Adult Education Compiled and edited by Multilateral Grundtvig Project 539717-LLP-1-2013-1-IT-GRUNDTVIG-GMP This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use, which may be made of the information contained therein. Content 1. What is open source? ............................................................................................. 3 1.1. Free Redistribution .......................................................................................... 3 1.2. Source Code..................................................................................................... 3 1.3. Derived Works ................................................................................................. 3 1.4. Integrity of The Author's Source Code ............................................................ 3 1.5. No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups ................................................ 3 1.6. No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor ................................................ 3 1.7. Distribution of License..................................................................................... 3 1.8. License Must Not Be Specific to a Product ..................................................... 4 1.9. License Must Not Restrict Other Software ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Web Server Software from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit ViewM ohrisetory Search Comparison of web server software From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Main page This article is a comparison of web server software. Contents Featured content Contents [hide] Current events 1 Overview Random article 2 Features Donate to Wikipedia 3 Operating system support Wikimedia Shop 4 See also Interaction 5 References Help 6 External links About Wikipedia Community portal Recent changes Overview [edit] Contact page Tools Server Developed by Software license Last stable version Latest release date What links here AOLserver NaviSoft Mozilla 4.5.2 2012-09-19 Related changes Apache HTTP Server Apache Software Foundation Apache 2.4.10 2014-07-21 Upload file Special pages Apache Tomcat Apache Software Foundation Apache 7.0.53 2014-03-30 Permanent link Boa Paul Phillips GPL 0.94.13 2002-07-30 Page information Caudium The Caudium Group GPL 1.4.18 2012-02-24 Wikidata item Cite this page Cherokee HTTP Server Álvaro López Ortega GPL 1.2.103 2013-04-21 Hiawatha HTTP Server Hugo Leisink GPLv2 9.6 2014-06-01 Print/export Create a book HFS Rejetto GPL 2.2f 2009-02-17 Download as PDF IBM HTTP Server IBM Non-free proprietary 8.5.5 2013-06-14 Printable version Internet Information Services Microsoft Non-free proprietary 8.5 2013-09-09 Languages Jetty Eclipse Foundation Apache 9.1.4 2014-04-01 Čeština Jexus Bing Liu Non-free proprietary 5.5.2 2014-04-27 Galego Nederlands lighttpd Jan Kneschke (Incremental) BSD variant 1.4.35 2014-03-12 Português LiteSpeed Web Server LiteSpeed Technologies Non-free proprietary 4.2.3 2013-05-22 Русский Mongoose Cesanta Software GPLv2 / commercial 5.5 2014-10-28 中文 Edit links Monkey HTTP Server Monkey Software LGPLv2 1.5.1 2014-06-10 NaviServer Various Mozilla 1.1 4.99.6 2014-06-29 NCSA HTTPd Robert McCool Non-free proprietary 1.5.2a 1996 Nginx NGINX, Inc.
    [Show full text]