January/February 1965

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

January/February 1965 Copied from an original at The History Center. www.TheHistoryCenterOnline.com 2013.23 • 1965 Copied from an original at The History Center. www.TheHistoryCenterOnline.com 2013.23 Copied from an original at The History Center. www.TheHistoryCenterOnline.com 2013.23 MACHINERY DIVISION Sales and Service Offices BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA NATCHEZ, MISSISSIPPI 2500 Parker Lane P. 0. Box 804 PUMPING UNITS P. 0 . Box 444 Phone: FAirview 7-3563 Phone: 445-4691 ~ CASPER, WYOMING NEW YORK, NEW YORK East Yellowstone Hwy. P. 0 . Box 1849 350 Fifth Avenue Phone: 237-2670 3904 Empire State Buildin11 Phone: 695-4745 LINE CRYSTAL LAKE, ILLINOIS 65 N. Williams Street P. 0. Box 382 ODESSA, TEXAS Phone : 459-4033 I 020 West 2nd St. CIRCULATION THIS ISSUE: 16,460 P. 0 . Box 1632 CLEVELAN D, OHIO ?hone: FEderal 7-8649 January February, 1965 316A Suburban-West Bldg. 20800 Center Ridge Rd . Volume 40 Number l Phone: EDison 1-5722 OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA 1317 West Reno CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS P. 0 . Box 82337 1413 Casa Grande Phone: CEntral 6-4521 Published to promote Friendship and Good Will Phone: TErminal 5-8987 with its customers and friends and to advance the interest of its products by the Lufkin Foundry & PAMPA, TEXAS Machine Company, Lufkin, Texas. P. O. Box 2212 Virginia R. Allen, Editor Phone: MOhawk 5-4120 DENVER, COLORADO PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 2027 Security Life Bldg. Phone: 222-9589 Penn Center Room 301 201 Penn Center Blvd. In This Issue GREAT BEND, l\ANSAS Phone: 241 -5131 North Main Street P. 0 . Box 82 SHREVEPORT, LOUISIANA SOUTHERN SKIING-Frank J. Miller . 4 Phone: Gladstone 3-5622 2005 Beck Building SNAPSHOTS BY THE LUFKIN CAMERAMAN . 8 P. 0 . Box 5578 FARMINGTON , NEW MEXICO Phone: 424-3297 HUCKMAN TRUCKING COMPANY . 12 East Bloomfield Highway P. 0 . Box 1554 LUFKIN INSTALLATIONS 14 Phone: DAvis 5-4261 SIDNEY, MONTANA Highway 16 VISITORS TO LUFKIN HOME OFFICE . 16 HOBBS, NEW MEXICO P. 0 . Box 551 ST. AUGUSTINE CELEBRATES ITS 400TH ANNIVERSARY­ P. O. Box 97 Phone: 482-2707 1212 E. Lincoln Rd . Phil H. Weber . 20 Phone: EXpress 3-5211 TULSA, OKLAHOMA LUFKIN ANNOUNCES PROMOTIONS 1302 Petroleum Club Bldg. 24 HOUSTON, TEXAS Phone: LUther 7-7171 1408 C & I life Bldg. HERE & THERE AMONG TRUCKING FOLK . 25 Phone: CApitol 2-0108 WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS LET'S LAUGH 26 727 Oil & Gas Bldg. KILGORE, TEXAS P. 0 . Box 871 P. 0 . Box 2465 Phone: 3875 Phone: 322-1967 COVER: Florida Development Commission, Tallahassee, Flo rida LAFAYETTE, LOUISIANA LUFKIN MACHINE CO., LTD. P. 0 . Box 1353 OCS Edmonton, Alberta,Canado OPPOSITE PAGE: Cannon Beach, Oregon. Haystack Phone: CEnter 4-2846 9950 Sixty-Fifth Ave. Rock Offshore. Phone: 433-3694 -Frank D. Silkey, Salem, Ore. LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 5959 South Alameda Estevan, Saskatchewan, Canada Phone: LUdlow 5-1201 P. 0. Box 622 Phone: 634-5595 LUFKIN FOUNDRY & MACHINE CO., INTERNATIONAL Anoco, Venezuela Estado Anzoategul TRAILER DIVISION Aportado 46 Maracaibo, Estado Zulia, Venezuela Sales and Service 0 {fices Apartado 1144 Phone: 3132 Buenos Aires, Argentina BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA LUBBOCK, TEXAS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS Matpetrol S.R.L. 3700 10th Ave., North 709 Slaton Hwy. 3343 Roosevelt Ave. Esmeralda 155 Phone: 592-8164 P. 0 . Box 188 Phone: WAinut 3-4334 Phone: 45-4822 Phone : SHerwood 7-1631 La Paz, Bolivia DALLAS, TEXAS SHREVEPORT, LOUISIANA Matpetrol ltda. 635 Fort Worth Ave. Calle Bueno 144 MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE U. S. Highway 80, East Phone: 9943 Phone : Riverside 2-2471 P. 0 . Box 5473, Bossier City 1947 E. Brooks Road Phone: 746-4636 LUFKIN OVERSEAS P. 0 . Box 16485 HOUSTON, TEXAS CORP., S.A. Phone: 397-9382 2815 Navigation Blvd. EXECUTIVE OFFICES Rome, Italy Phone : CApitol 5-0241 & FACTORY 50 Via Barberini Phone: 487.200 OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA Lufkin, Texas 75902 JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 1315 West Reno P. O. Box 848 EXECUTIVE OFFICES Highway 80 East P. 0 . Box 82596 Phone: NEptune 4-4421 & FACTORY C. W. Alexander, Sales Manager LufkinL Texas 75902 P. 0 . Box I 0935 Phone: CEntral 6-3687 P. o. llOX 849 Phone: 948-0602 Trailer Division Phone: NEptune 4-4421 Floyd Rogers, Ass't. Sales Manager l. A. Little, Executive Vice President and Oilfield Sales Manager C. D. Richards, Vice President and Manager, Machinery Sales TRAILERS FOR EVERY HAULING NEED Copied from an original at The History Center. www.TheHistoryCenterOnline.com 2013.23 \ . ' t 2-. THIS is the main ski slope of the Cataloochee Ski Resort. The ski lodge, in the middle background, is a converted hay barn SOUTHERN SUMMER dude ranches in the Great Smoky Moun­ tains are turning into winter ski resorts from mid­ December until mid-March SKIING By Frank J. Miller F you only remember North Carolina for its I seasons of budding spring, verdant summers, or golden autumn, it could be that you have missed the current whispers about the new winter era in this scenic land of mountains and magnolias. Winter skiing has finally migrated south, and the Great Smokies and Blue Ridges that once slept during the winter months have come alive with an exciting new sport. Now the slopes and valleys are singing with the sounds of skiis, and oddly enough, it does not de­ pend on whether it nows, or not. If the tempera­ ture is right, you make your own snow with the help of some modern snow guns. They use com­ pressed air and water at 30 degrees or less, and it provides ome fine white particles which fair a great deal better than the natural variety when the warming trends hit the winter weather. Skiing in the Carolina mountains started slowly in 1961, but has mushroomed into an avalanche of 4 Copied from an original at The History Center. www.TheHistoryCenterOnline.com 2013.23 A SNOWSTORM, southern-style, is made by mod­ ern snow-guns used to coat the western North Caro­ lina Ski Slopes acceptance. Enthusiasts of all ages, from all walks A PORTION of the Lodge and the main ski slopes of Blowing Rock Ski Resort is shown here. A T-bar on of life and from all parts of the country are tak­ the right serves this slope ing to the slopes with more fervor than the Big Apple, the Twist, or the Hurdy-Gurdy ever gener­ ated. And it is a delight for the people of these famous resort areas who used to close up shop up into the valley on Fie Top Mountain. And each during the dead of winter. year since he first opened, Tom has had to extend At the present, there are three ski areas in the ski facilities to take care of the crowds. western North Carolina, with several more on the The Cataloochee Ski area i located just above way. Their season runs from mid-December to well-known Maggie Valley along U. S. Highway mid-March, and each offers its own particular at­ 441 near Waynesville. If you fly in, you land at mosphere including everything from the variety of Asheville, rent a car, or ride the bus to Maggie a rusti c mountaintop to the scenic setting of the Valley. Then you go up the steep Cataloochee road Blue Ridge slopes, to a picturesque valley of Swiss­ by car or four-wheel drive transportation that is sty led appeal. furnished. Many of the Maggie Valley motels, Cataloochee Ski Slopes, 5,000 feet high in the inns and hotels are staying open now for this Great Smokies, has a delightful rustic atmosphere winter sport season. If you want to bunk at Cata­ of its own. This summer dude ranch, with its log loochee's rustic heights, just bring your bed-roll. cottages, barns, rail fences, and mountaintop Ski-wise, Cataloochee now has a 1,400-foot meadows, does an about face when winter comes. T-bar, and four rope tows serving five different Man-made snow, often backed by periodic natural slopes. Six ski instructors are available as is a snowfalls, turns this area into a land of shimmer­ rental shop for skiis, poles and boots, .plus a din­ ing white, and it isn't long before the pa tures echo ing room at the Ski Lodge. Below, in Maggie to the sound of skiis. Valley, there is also an ice skating rink. Tom Alexander first introduced winter skiing at Over in the Blue Ridge, North Carolina's oldest his dude ranch in December, 1961, and he has summer resort at Blowing Rock, is the scene of been amazed at the way people have taken to this another swinging ski area. The Blowing Rock new sport. Each year there have been an increas­ Slopes are just a short driving distance from the ing flow of skiers and interested people climbing flatlands of the Piedmont, making them the most 5 Copied from an original at The History Center. www.TheHistoryCenterOnline.com 2013.23 RIGHT: This view looks out from the main lodge of the most elaborate new ski resort in western North Carolina-Shull's Mill Valley near Boone. With an atmosphere of Swiss-styled architecture, Hound Ears Golf and Ski Club offers luxury accommoda­ tions. The ski slope just behind the main lodge runs LOOO feet down slope with a double chair lift. THE new-found pastime of skiing down south often reflects the quick favor the novice places on learn­ ing. This particular gent went up the rope tow of the Blowing Rock medium slope 100 times-and he fell 100 times. But this didn't deter him; closing time found him still learning the hard way accessible. Just down off the mountains, the city of Hickory is about one hour away, with Charlotte and Winston-Salem some two or three hours dis­ tant.
Recommended publications
  • Oil Company Strategies from 1970 to the Present
    5.2 Oil company strategies from 1970 to the present Since 1970, the world oil and gas industry has been three-and-a-half decades. The most notable change transformed by a series of massive shifts in the has been the widening international diversity of economic, political and technological environment. the leading companies. The newcomers to the Adapting to these external forces has involved ranks of the major oil and gas companies were major changes in the strategies of the oil and gas primarily state-owned companies that were based companies. The impact of these changes is either in major petroleum producing countries indicated by a comparison of the leading (Pemex of Mexico, Statoil of Norway, PDVSA of companies in the industry in 1970 and in 2004 Venezuela, Gazprom of Russia) or in major (Table 1). In 1970, the industry was dominated by consumer countries (China Petroleum & Chemical the Seven Sisters,1 the leading US and and PetroChina of China, SK Corporation of European-based petroleum companies that South Korea, Indian Oil of India). Indeed, our list pioneered the development of the industry for most grossly understates the importance of the national of the Twentieth century. Five of the sisters were oil companies from several oil producing American: Exxon (then, Standard Oil New Jersey), countries because they do not publish financial Mobil, Chevron (then, Standard Oil California), accounts. On the basis of their estimated revenues, Texaco, and Gulf Oil; the remaining two were Saudi Aramco and National Iranian Oil European: Royal Dutch/Shell Group, the Corporation would certainly be included in our Anglo-Dutch joint venture, and British Petroleum top-20 for 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • A Field Guide to Gas Stations in Texas
    Historical Studies Report No. 2003-03 A Field Guide to Gas Stations in Texas By W. Dwayne Jones A Field Guide to Gas Stations in Texas by W. Dwayne Jones Prepared For Environmental Affairs Division Historical Studies Report No. 2003-3 Prepared by Knight & Associates October 2003 A Field Guide to Gas Stations in Texas Copyright © 2003 by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) All rights reserved. TxDOT owns all rights, title, and interest in and to all data and other information developed for this project. Brief passages from this publication may be reproduced without permission provided that credit is given to TxDOT and the author. Permission to reprint an entire chapter or section, photographs, illustrations, and maps must be obtained in advance from the Supervisor of the Historical Studies Branch, Environmental Affairs Division, Texas Department of Transportation, 118 East Riverside Drive, Austin, Teas, 78701. Copies of this publication have been deposited with the Texas State Library in compliance with the State Depository requirements. For further information on this and other TxDOT historical publications, please contact: Texas Department of Transportation Environmental Affairs Division Historical Studies Branch Lisa J. Hart, Supervisor Historical Studies Report No. 2003-3 Bruce Jensen, Series Editor Editing and production of this report was directed by Knight & Associates 3470 Jack C. Hays Trail Buda, Texas 78610 ISBN 1-930788-51-7 A Field Guide to Gas Stations in Texas Table of Contents Introduction . 1 Looking at Gas Stations . 11 1910-1920: Drive-Up Gas Stations . 23 1920-1930: Full Service / Corporate Identification Gas Stations . 33 1930-1940: Machine Made / Streamlined – The Depression Era .
    [Show full text]
  • A Personal Journey Presentation by Tony Craven Walker to Scottish Oil Club – Edinburgh 16 May 2019
    FIFTY YEARS IN THE NORTH SEA: A PERSONAL JOURNEY PRESENTATION BY TONY CRAVEN WALKER TO SCOTTISH OIL CLUB – EDINBURGH 16 MAY 2019 Ladies and Gentlemen. I am delighted to be here today. As we are in Scotland, the home of whisky, I was tempted to call this talk “Tony Walker – Started 1965 - Still Going Strong”. Then I read about Algy Cluff’s retirement last week described as “The Last Man Standing” so I was tempted to call it “The Last Man Still Standing”. But I decided on FIFTY YEARS IN THE NORTH SEA: A PERSONAL JOURNEY. With around one hour allotted that works out at around one year per minute so I had better get a move on! Actually it has been 54 years since I joined the oil industry but what a journey it has been. One which is not over just yet as far as I am concerned and one which has given me great challenges and great pleasure. Before diving into things I thought it might be fun to mention that Anton Ziolkowski, your President, and I go back way into the 1950’s when we were neighbours living next door to each other as small boys in London. It is curious and always amazing how the world works to find that we are in the same industry and he has invited me to speak today. I will keep to myself some of the pranks that Anton and I got up to as youngsters, “tin-can tommy” and “mud-ball sling” spring to mind, as I certainly don’t want to embarrass your president.
    [Show full text]
  • ROBERT WAYNE VEIGEL; ELLA MARIE WILLIAMS VEIGEL; VEIGEL FARMS, INC.; VEIGEL CATTLE COMPANY; and VEIGEL FARM PARTNERS
    Case 1:16-cv-01036-WPL-KK Document 118 Filed 03/07/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO TERRA PARTNERS; TERRA XXI, LTD.; ROBERT WAYNE VEIGEL; ELLA MARIE WILLIAMS VEIGEL; VEIGEL FARMS, INC.; VEIGEL CATTLE COMPANY; and VEIGEL FARM PARTNERS, Plaintiffs, v. CV 16-1036 WPL/CG AG ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING AG ACCEPTANCE’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND FOR SANCTIONS This case arises out of a series of promissory notes executed in Texas in 1997 and 1998 by certain of the Plaintiffs1 to Ag Services, Inc. As security for the notes, Terra XXI, Ltd. gave Ag Services third mortgages on real property it owned in Deaf Smith County, Texas, and Quay and Guadalupe counties in New Mexico. Ag Services subsequently assigned the notes to Ag Acceptance Corporation. Plaintiffs defaulted on the notes in 2003, and in September of 2003 Ag Acceptance purchased the Texas property at a foreclosure sale for $20,000, subject to two senior mortgages on the property. Litigation between the Plaintiffs, Ag Acceptance, and other creditors of Plaintiffs began soon thereafter, spawning four Texas state court cases, five lawsuits filed in federal court in 1 The Plaintiffs are a complex web of individuals, partnerships and corporations in Texas run by members of the Veigel family. Rabo Agrifinance, Inc. v. Terra XXI, Ltd., 583 F.3d 348, 350 n.2 (5th Cir. 2009). Case 1:16-cv-01036-WPL-KK Document 118 Filed 03/07/17 Page 2 of 10 Texas, and a foreclosure lawsuit filed in New Mexico state court.
    [Show full text]
  • Pageid
    Case 7:03-cv-00102-D Document 235 Filed 05/22/08 Page 1 of 27 PageID <pageID> IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION VICTORIA KLEIN, et al., § § Plaintiffs, § § Civil Action No. 7:03-CV-102-D VS. § § O’NEAL, INC., d/b/a O’NEAL, § JONES & FELDMAN § PHARMACEUTICALS, et al., § § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER In this class action alleging personal injury and death claims arising from the manufacture and distribution of E-Ferol Aqueous Solution (“E-Ferol”), a pharmaceutical product administered intravenously to premature infants between November 1983 and April 1984, defendants O’Neal, Inc. d/b/a O’Neal, Jones & Feldman Pharmaceuticals (“OJF”), CVS Revco D.S., Inc. (“CVS”), and Retrac, Inc. (“Retrac”) move for partial summary judgment. They maintain that all wrongful death and survival act claims brought on behalf of individuals who died before May 23, 2001 (i.e., two years before this suit was filed), and all claims (whether from personal injury or death) arising in Iowa or Tennessee, are time-barred. Plaintiffs rely on the defense of fraudulent concealment to avoid the time bar. For the reasons that follow, the court grants the motion in part and denies it in part. The court also raises sua sponte that the class certification decision should be reconsidered, and it directs the parties to submit supplemental Case 7:03-cv-00102-D Document 235 Filed 05/22/08 Page 2 of 27 PageID <pageID> briefing on that question. I At the time E-Ferol was administered, Retrac was a wholly owned subsidiary of CVS and was doing business as Carter-Glogau Laboratories (“Carter-Glogau”).
    [Show full text]
  • American Antitrust Liability of Foreign State Instrumentalities: a New Application of the Parker Doctrine James F
    Cornell International Law Journal Volume 11 Article 7 Issue 2 Summer 1978 American Antitrust Liability of Foreign State Instrumentalities: A New Application of the Parker Doctrine James F. Bauerle Kevin I. MacKenzie Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Bauerle, James F. and MacKenzie, Kevin I. (1978) "American Antitrust Liability of Foreign State Instrumentalities: A New Application of the Parker Doctrine," Cornell International Law Journal: Vol. 11: Iss. 2, Article 7. Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj/vol11/iss2/7 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell International Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTES AMERICAN ANTITRUST LIABILITY OF FOREIGN STATE INSTRUMENTALITIES: A NEW APPLICATION OF THE PARKER DOCTRINE The impact of foreign commercial enterprise on the American economy has increased dramatically in recent years.' Much of this increase reflects the efforts of private foreign companies.2 But the expanded role of national 3 governments in conducting traditionally private commercial enterprises has also contributed to the assault on the American market,4 raising the question of whether the actions of foreign governments and their instru- mentalities are immune from U.S. antitrust laws.5 This Note will first examine those cases that have considered the extrater- ritorial application of the antitrust laws against foreign governments and 6 their instrumentalities. Recent applications of the state action doctrine, which generally grants antitrust immunity to governmental activities, will 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Dutch Shell: Notice of Climate Risks 1958-1998
    Royal Dutch Shell: Notice of climate risks 1958-1998 Presentation to Commission on Human Rights CHR-NI-2016-0001 January 16, 2019 Carroll Muffett Not-for-profit, 501 (c)(3) legal organization CIEL uses the power of law to protect the environment, promote human rights and ensure a just and sustainable society. Active in climate law & policy since 1989. When is someone responsible for an outcome? • Capacity to foresee the harm • Opportunity to avoid it • Failure to take reasonable measures -Loysel, OW Holmes, HLA Hart, Perry 1958-Shell Exec reports on atmospheric carbon research by API Smoke and Fumes Committee1 Objective--fund and actively disseminate research to influence the public and limit unnecessary regulation of industry 1958--Shell recognized industry responsibility for pollution from product use 1959- Edward Teller warns Oil Execs It has been calculated that a temperature rise corresponding to a 10 per cent increase in carbon dioxide will be sufficient to melt the icecap and submerge New York. All the coastal cities would be covered, and since a considerable percentage of the human race lives in coastal regions, I think that this chemical contamination is more serious than most people tend to believe. 1968-The Robinson Report • SRI final report to API on atmospheric pollutants of interest to the industry. • Cautioned that rising levels of CO2 would likely result in rising global temperatures and, could lead to melting ice caps, rising sea levels, warming oceans, and serious environmental damage on a global scale. • Fossil fuel burning provides the best explanation for rising CO2. • Existing science is “detailed” and seems “to adequately explain the present state of CO2 in the atmosphere.” • Most important research need-- “systems in which CO2 emissions would be brought under control.” API Membership of Carbon Majors predecessors & subsidiaries— 1968-1969 • American Petrofina (Total and ALON) • Husky Energy • Arabian American Oil Company • Marathon Oil (Aramco) • Mobil Oil Corporation (ExxonMobil) • Atlantic Richfield Company • Murphy Oil • BP Canada Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate List
    Corporate Name Change & Merger Index Current As Of: March 12, 2020 Issuing Original or Previous Company Name Current Company Name Date of Memo State Office 08/08/2018 1986 STEA Ltd Partnership I Program Acquisition Company 05/21/2001 WY 1986 STEA Ltd Partnership II Program Acquisition Company 05/21/2001 WY 1987-STEA Ltd Partnership Program Acquisition Company 05/21/2001 WY 1987-II STEA Ltd Partnership Program Acquisition Company 05/21/2001 WY 1987III STEA Ltd Partnership Program Acquisition Company 05/21/2001 WY 1987-IV STEA Ltd Partnership Program Acquisition Company 05/21/2001 WY 1987-VI STEA Ltd Partnership Program Acquisition Company 05/21/2001 WY 1988-I TEAI Ltd Partnership Program Acquisition Company 05/21/2001 WY 1988III TEAI Ltd Partnership Program Acquisition Company 05/21/2001 WY 1988IV TEAI Ltd Partnership Program Acquisition Company 05/21/2001 WY 1988-V TEAI Ltd Partnership Program Acquisition Company 05/21/2001 WY 1988-VI TEAI Ltd Partnership Program Acquisition Company 05/21/2001 WY 1988VII TEAI Ltd Partnership Program Acquisition Company 05/21/2001 WY 1989III TEAI Ltd Partnership Program Acquisition Company 05/21/2001 WY 3TECH Energy Corp PXP Gulf 07/17/2003 NM 44 Canyon, L.L.C. Pure Resources, LP 06/08/2006 NM A 1 Corporate Name Change & Merger Index Current As Of: March 12, 2020 Issuing Original or Previous Company Name Current Company Name Date of Memo State Office AA Development Corporation AA Energy Corp 02/11/1985 WY Amended Decision-Additional Lease 10/29/1985 WY AA Energy Corp AMR Energy Corp 02/11/1985 WY Amended Decision-Additional Lease 10/29/1985 WY Aberdeen American Petro Aberdeen Petro (USA) Inc 04/10/1990 WY 05/14/2013 CO Abraxas Operating, LLC Abraxax Petroleum Corporation 08/26/2013 WY Abraxas Production Co Abraxas Petroleum Corp 11/30/1999 WY ABO Petroleum Corporation EOG A Resources Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Petroleum Industry: Mergers, Structural Change, and Antitrust
    Federal Trade Commission TIMOTHY J. MURIS Chairman MOZELLE W. THOMPSON Commissioner ORSON SWINDLE Commissioner THOMAS B. LEARY Commissioner PAMELA JONES HARBOUR Commissioner Bureau of Economics Luke M. Froeb Director Mark W. Frankena Deputy Director for Antitrust Paul A. Pautler Deputy Director for Consumer Protection Timothy A. Deyak Associate Director for Competition Analysis Pauline M. Ippolito Associate Director for Special Projects Robert D. Brogan Assistant Director for Antitrust Louis Silvia Assistant Director for Antitrust Michael G. Vita Assistant Director for Antitrust Denis A. Breen Assistant Director for Economic Policy Analysis Gerard R. Butters Assistant Director for Consumer Protection This is a report of the Bureau of Economics of the Federal Trade Commission. The views expressed in this report are those of the staff and do not necessarily represent the views of the Federal Trade Commission or any individual Commissioner. The Commission has voted to authorize staff to publish this report. Acknowledgments This report was prepared by the Bureau of Economics under the supervision of David T. Scheffman, former Director; Mary T. Coleman, former Deputy Director and Mark Frankena, Deputy Director; and Louis Silvia, Assistant Director. Bureau economists who researched and drafted this report were Jay Creswell, Jeffrey Fischer, Daniel Gaynor, Geary Gessler, Christopher Taylor, and Charlotte Wojcik. Bureau Research Analysts who worked on this project were Madeleine McChesney, Joseph Remy, Michael Madigan, Paul Golaszewski, Matthew Tschetter, Ryan Toone, Karl Kindler, Steve Touhy, and Louise Sayers. Bureau of Economics staff also acknowledge the review of drafts and many helpful comments and suggestions from members of the staff of the Bureau of Competition, in particular Phillip L.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuances of Unclaimed Property Oil and Gas Reporting Oklahoma
    Journal of Multistate Taxation and Incentives (Thomson Reuters/Tax & Accounting) Volume 27, Number 6, September 2017 PROCEDURE Expect the Unexpected: Nuances of Unclaimed Property Oil and Gas Reporting For holders of unclaimed property in the oil and gas industry, the challenge of complying with complex state laws is amplified. By CHRISTOPHER JENSEN, SAM SCHAUNAMAN AND MINDA WHEELER CHRISTOPHER JENSEN is a Director, SAM SCHAUNAMAN is a Senior Manager and MINDA WHEELER is a Senior Consultant with the Abandoned and Unclaimed Property Practice at Ryan, LLC. Only three things are certain in life: death, taxes, and state unclaimed property enforcement. Over the last decade, state unclaimed property laws have become an easy method for states to increase revenue without raising taxes on their residents. Currently, states hold approximately $42 billion in unclaimed assets.1 This has been achieved either through increasingly aggressive penalty and interest assessments on past due remittances, or an exam conducted by multistate unclaimed property contract auditors. Both methods create a large, and potentially costly, headache for holders. Unclaimed property laws are anything but uniform. From outreach requirements, dormancy periods, filing methods, and statutory deadlines, holders struggle to stay abreast of the numerous details and frequent changes to state laws. For holders in the oil and gas industry, this challenge is amplified, specifically due to the nuances around the reporting of "mineral proceeds."2 This article provides an overview of the top ten unique items pertinent to the reporting of unclaimed mineral proceeds. Oklahoma—Two Agencies Oklahoma is unique in that reporting of mineral proceeds may be required to two separate state agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 4:05-Cv-02016 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/03/08 Page 1 of 102
    Case 4:05-cv-02016 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/03/08 Page 1 of 102 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION SHELL PETROLEUM INC., § § Plaintiff, § § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. H-05-2016 § UNITED STATES, § § Defendant. § FINDINGS OF FACT, LEGAL ANALYSIS, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER Case 4:05-cv-02016 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/03/08 Page 2 of 102 TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page Agreed Findings of Fact . 1 Additional Findings of Fact . 54 Legal Analysis of Controlling Facts . 63 I. Transfers to Corporation Controlled by Transferor Under Section 351 . 63 A. Purpose and effects of § 351 . 63 B. The Formation of and Property Transfers to Shell Frontier . 66 II. “Property” within the Meaning of § 351 . 70 III. Sham Transaction Doctrine . 76 A. Legal Principles . 76 B. Application . 82 IV. Reallocation Pursuant to Section 482 . 94 Conclusions of Law . 97 Order . 100 i Case 4:05-cv-02016 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/03/08 Page 3 of 102 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION SHELL PETROLEUM INC., § § Plaintiff, § § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. H-05-2016 § UNITED STATES, § § Defendant. § FINDINGS OF FACT, LEGAL ANALYSIS, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER After all parties have rested and closed the evidence, and having heard and considered the arguments and authorities of counsel, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 52. Agreed Findings of Fact The parties have mutually agreed to the following findings of fact, which the Court adopts: I.
    [Show full text]
  • MERCER LAW REVIEW [Index
    1482 MERCER LAW REVIEW [Index TABLE OF CASES NOTED VOL:PAGE Abernathy v. Sisters of St. Mary's, 446 S.W.2d 599 (Mo. 1969) .......... 21:521 Adolph Coors Co. v. FTC, 497 F.2d 1178 (10th Cir. 1974) ............... 26:641 Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Sanders, 127 Ga. App. 352, 193 S.E.2d 1973 (1972) ......................................................... 24 :967 Argersinger v. Hamlin, 236 So.2d 442 (Fla. 1970), rev'd, 407 U.S. 25 (1972) .......................................................... 24 :497 Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134 (1974) ............................... 26:1429 Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public Education, 453 Pa. 584, 305 A.2d 877 (1973) ...................................................... 25:969 Bell v. Burson, 402 U.S. 535 (1971) ................................... 23:383 Boys' Market, Inc. v. .Retail Clerk's Union, Local 779, 398 U.S. 235 (1970 ) ............................. ............................ 21:703 Breaux v. State, 230 Ga. 506, 197 S.E.2d 695 (1973) .................... 25:371 Brooks v. Auburn University, 412 F.2d 1171 (5th Cir. 1969) ............. 21:689 Brooks v. Williams, 227 Ga. 59, 178 S.E.2d 880 (1970) .................. 23:399 Bryant v. Bryant, 232 Ga. 160, 205 S.E.2d 223 (1974) ................... 26:357 Byous v. State, 121 Ga. App. 654, 175 S.E.2d 106 (1970) ................ 21:695 Carlton Co. v. Poss, 124 Ga. App. 154, 183 S.E.2d 231, aff'd, 228 Ga. 402, 185 S.E .2d 803 (1971) ........................................... 23:691 Caudell v. Scoggins, 120 Ga. App. 286, 170 S.E.2d 343 (1969) ........... 21:535 City of Atlanta v. Mapel, 121 Ga. App. 567, 174 S.E.2d 599 (1970) ...... 22:608 Coly v.
    [Show full text]