Pitfalls and preservatives: A review JESO Volume 145, 2014 PITFALLS AND PRESERVATIVES: A REVIEW M. J. SKVARLA1*, J. L. LARSON2, A. P. G. DOWLING3 1,3Department of Entomology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72701 email,
[email protected] Abstract J. ent. Soc. Ont. 145: 15–43 An extensive review of the factors that affect the performance of arthropod pitfall traps is given. Liquid preservatives are discussed in a separate section because the choice affects the quality and composition of taxa collected in pitfalls. Published November 2014 Introduction Pitfall traps are a popular method for collecting ground beetles, spiders, ants and other epigeal arthropods (Westberg 1977; Niemelä et al. 1992; Bestelmeyer et al. 2000; Southwood & Henderson 2000; Phillips & Cobb 2005). While many shorter, general overviews exist (e.g., general techniques: Balogh 1958; Duffey 1972; Bestelmeyer et al. 2000; Southwood and Henderson 2000; Woodcock 2005; issues with pitfalls: Adis 1979), none have exhaustively examined the published literature recently. Herein we present such a review with the hope it will provide a sound base for those incorporating pitfall traps into research. While the choice of preservative will affect the quality of specimens in any type of trap, it is a critical decision in pitfalls for several reasons. Chiefly, preservatives differentially attract and repel select arthropod taxa, which will affect the composition of taxa collected (Weeks & McIntyre 1997). Additionally, pitfalls are often set without covers in open fields, so lose more preservative through evaporation than other traps and are affected to a greater degree by rain and dilution by rainwater (Porter 2005). Therefore, we include a section detailing possible positives and negatives of preservatives used in pitfall traps.