DOCSLIB.ORG

Eng304ah1x-201101

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eng304ah1x-201101 ENG 304 Twentieth Century American Drama Boles Meeting Times and Place: 12:00-12:50 MWF; Orlando 205 Office Hours: 9-10 MWF; 11:00-12:00 MWF Office: 106 Carnegie Office Phone #: 2216 E-mail: [email protected] What’s at stake in this course: The United States of America. The great melting pot (at least that is what we were told in third grade). In this course we’ll take a look at this image of the U.S. by studying plays of the 20th century in hopes that they will provide a document of just how well we have melted and merged together. In the process we will try and answer some of these questions: Just what is the face of 20th Century America? Who are we as a country? What do we stand for? Do we have similar pursuits? Are we truly melted or are we all pursuing different agendas? What role does race, religion and gender play in dramatic literature? What is the view of theatre about the state of America? And finally, is the American theatre an accurate reflection of the United States? Required Texts: Bash Neil LaBute, $11.25 American Buffalo David Mamet, $9.75 Speed-the-Plow David Mamet, $7.50 Oleanna David Mamet M. Butterfly David Henry Hwang, $7.50 Seven Plays Sam Shepard, $12.00 Trifles Susan Glaspell (.pdf file) The Verge Susan Glaspell (.pdf file) Machinal Sophie Treadwell, $18.95 The Little Foxes Lillian Hellman, $7.50 Mulatto Langston Hughes (.pdf file) Fences August Wilson (.pdf file) Homebody/Kabul Tony Kushner, $13.95 The Mercy Seat Neil LaBute, $9.75 Where Do We Live Christopher Shinn, $17.95 Tentative Schedule Jan. 10 Introduction The United States: Views from the White Patriarchal Position (with one exception) 1/12-1/14 American Buffalo 1/19-1/21 Speed-the-Plow 1/24-1/28 Oleanna 1/31-2/4 M. Butterfly David Henry Hwang will be at Rollins this week 2/7-2/11 The Tooth of Crime 2/14-2/18 Curse of the Starving Class 2/21-2/25 Buried Child 2/28-3/4 Bash and other LaBute pieces Spring Break “Other” America: Views from the Minority Position 3/14 Trifles 3/16-3/18 The Verge 3/21-3/25 Machinal 3/28-3/30 The Little Foxes 4/1-4/4 Mulatto 4/6-4/8 Fences 9/11 Drama 4/11-4/15 Homebody/Kabul Tony Kushner will be at Rollins this week 4/18-4/20 The Mercy Seat 4/22-25 Where Do We Live 4/28 8-10 AM FINAL EXAM It is possible that we may find ourselves extending beyond the allotted times. If so, I will update you on the change in the schedule in class. You are responsible for finding out this information, if you are not present. Any drastic changes in the syllabus and I will provide you with an updated syllabus. Requirements: 1. There will be a comprehensive final exam. 2. Class Participation is an essential and required component of this professor's classroom dynamic. This requirement does not just entail the ability of the student to open his mouth and let any random musing clatter onto the tabletop. Students will be evaluated based on the quality, insightfulness and perceptiveness of their comments. Exemplary attendance and no participation will equal a C. Exemplary attendance and occasional thought provoking remarks or well-framed questions will constitute a B. Exemplary attendance and excellent observations, analysis and comments will receive an A. The teacher reserves the right to also bestow variations upon a grade, for instance A-, C+, etc. Also counting toward class participation: Each student will participate in leading a 50 minute class discussion of one of the required plays. If the class is too large for such a designation, then students can be paired for a group presentation. Your presentation must include a dramatic reading (performed by students in the class) of what you consider to the most important/significant/problematic (you choose) scene in the play. Why did you choose this scene? How does it relate to the greater play as a whole? What is the playwright trying to tell us? Some other suggestions: Think about what the main points of the play are. How does the play fit within the larger context of the plays being read? Is it theatrically innovative? Does the play have a political purpose? How does it compare with other plays written around the same time period? Oleanna M. Butterfly The Tooth of Crime Curse of the Starving Class Buried Child Machinal The Little Foxes Mulatto Fences Homebody/Kabul Mercy Seat Where Do We Live 3. There is no attendance policy, but recognize that excessive absences (translation: Over 3) impact your participation grade. 4. Eight musings are due over the course of the semester. What’s a musing? (A guy slipping on a banana peel? A flower that squirts water?) A musing is at least two pages of jottings, questions, concerns, and observations. (But please not your notes on the readings. A musing is beyond note taking, it is the early phase of your intellectual engagement with the assigned readings.) In essence, it is an informal opportunity for you to respond to whatever intrigues you in the readings without having to worry about the formal expectations that accompany the majorly over assigned response paper, meaning that your musing can be filled with fragments, flow charts, drawings, etc. Musings serve as a wonderful opportunity for potential paper topics to develop. A musing can only be submitted on the first day (at the start of class) that we discuss a work. 5. By the end of the term you will have submitted papers that, when combined, equal 16-20 pages of graded work. You can approach this requirement in a variety of ways. Nine 2-page papers. Four 4-5-page papers. Two 8-10-page papers. An 8-page paper, a 6- page paper, and two 2-page papers. Use the various sections as a guide to possible paper topics, since they are grouped thematically. Please note: when we finish a play, you have one week to turn in your paper. So, if you wanted to write about Curse of the Starving Class, you have until February 25th to turn in the paper. However, you always have the possibility of returning to a section/play if you see a connection between a later play and an earlier one. The final due date for papers will be April 15th. EXPECTATIONS Paper expectations (these are general guidelines with some latitude at work when grading takes place): An “A” paper will be one that is grammatically clean, engagingly written, intently focused on the topic at hand (thesis oriented), insightful in analyzing the work(s) being considered (no regurgitation of class discussion, no plot summary), and in possession of a well thought out opening paragraph. A “B” paper will be one that is grammatically acceptable (but still have a few flaws); at times engagingly written but still have some moments of problematic style and tone; focused, for the most part, on the topic at hand; insightful, for the most part, in analyzing the work(s) being considered; and clear in its opening paragraph. In other words, a B paper has some of the components that are found in the A paper, but still have a few missteps that impede the stylistic flow or analytical argument of the paper as a whole. A “C” paper will be one that has grammatical problems (and usually a few proofreading errors); a writing style and tone that is more problematic than the B paper; a thesis that is not explored as deeply as the two papers above; the occasional reliance on plot summary and regurgitation of classroom comments; and a simple opening paragraph. In other words, a C paper could have some of the components found in the B paper, but have enough missteps to impede the stylistic flow or analytical argument of the paper as a whole. A “D” paper will be one that has serious grammatical errors, which indicate the paper is not proofread; a lack of cohesiveness to the direction of the paper’s argument; a seriously flawed thesis; and a number of paragraphs that exist by themselves rather than being linked to the overall direction of the paper as a whole. In other words, a D paper might possess a few of the components found in a C paper, but have enough missteps to impede the argument and directional flow of the paper as a whole. An “F” paper is entirely unacceptable collegiate work. It features all the characteristics of a “D” paper but to an extreme degree. All papers will use MLA style. A late paper will be deducted for every day it is late. Grade Breakdown: Papers 50% Musing 15% Final 15% Class Participation 20% Academic Honor Code Membership in the student body of Rollins College carries with it an obligation, and requires a commitment, to act with honor in all things. Because academic integrity is fundamental to the pursuit of knowledge and truth and is the heart of the academic life of Rollins College, it is the responsibility of all members of the College community to practice it and to report apparent violations. The following pledge is a binding commitment by the students of Rollins College: The development of the virtues of Honor and Integrity are integral to a Rollins College education and to membership in the Rollins College community. Therefore, I, a student of Rollins College, pledge to show my commitment to these virtues by abstaining from any lying, cheating, or plagiarism in my academic endeavors and by behaving responsibly, respectfully and honorably in my social life and in my relationships with others.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lntertextuality in AMERICAN DRAMA Critical Essays on Eugene 0 'Neill, Susan Glaspell, Thornton Wilder, -~Arthur Miller and Other Playwrights
    lNTERTEXTUALITY IN AMERICAN DRAMA Critical Essays on Eugene 0 'Neill, Susan Glaspell, Thornton Wilder, -~Arthur Miller and Other Playwrights Edited by Drew Eisenhauer and Brenda Murphy McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers Jefferson, North Carolina, and London Table of Contents Introduction: What Is "'ntertextuality" and Why Is the Term Important Today? DREW EISENHAUER .......................... 1 Part I: Literary Intertextuality LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGUING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA SECTION ONE: PoETS Intertextuality in American drama : critical essays on Eugene O'Neill, Susan Glaspell, Thornton Wilder, Arthur Miller The Ancient Mariner and O'Neill's Intertextual Epiphany and other playwrights I edited by Drew Eisenhauer and (Herman Daniel Farrell III) ............................... 10 Brenda Murphy. p. em. "Deep in my silent sea": Eugene O'Neill's Extended Includes bibliographical references and index. Adaptation of Coleridge's The Ancient Mariner ISBN 978-0-7864-6391-6 (Rupendra Guha Majumdar) ............................... 25 softcover : acid free paper § A Multi-Faceted Moon: Shakespearean and Keatsian Echoes 1. American drama- 20th century- History in Eugene O'Neill's A Moon for the Misbegotten and criticism. 2. O'Neill, Eugene, 1888-1953- (Aurelie Sanchez) ........................................ 36 Criticism and interpretation. 3. Glaspell, Susan, 1876-1948- Criticism and interpretation. Trailing Clouds of Glory: Glaspell, Romantic Ideology 4. Wilder, Thornton, 1897-1975- Criticism and Cultural Conflict in Modern American Literature and interpretation. 5. Miller, Arthur, 1915-2005- Criticism and interpretation. 6. Intertextuality. (Michael Winetsky) ...................................... 52 I. Eisenhauer, Drew. II. Murphy, Brenda, 1950- On Closets and Graves: Intertextualities in Susan Glaspell's PS350.I58 2013 Alison's House and Emily Dickinson's Poetry 812'.509-dc23 2012038662 (Noelia Hernando-Real) .................................
    [Show full text]
  • American Theatre and Drama Eugene O'neill and His Contemporaries
    Theatre 365-1: American Theatre and Drama Eugene O’Neill and His Contemporaries Monday/Wednesday 9:30-10:50am, Parkes Hall 215 Instructor: Shannon K. Fitzsimons ([email protected]) Office Hours: By appointment Course Description This course will examine American drama and theatre history from 1915 to 1945 through the stylistically diverse career of Eugene O'Neill, the only American dramatist to win the Nobel Prize for Literature. Special emphasis will be placed on O'Neill's early career with the Provincetown Players, the expressionistic experiments of the 1920s, social dramas of the Depression years, and finally, the realist family dramas of the 1940s. Playwrights (besides O'Neill) to be studied include Susan Glaspell, Elmer Rice, Sophie Treadwell, Gertrude Stein, Marc Blitzstein, Clifford Odets, Tennessee Williams, and Arthur Miller. Assignments Discussion Questions Beginning with class on Wednesday, January 4, and continuing through class on Wednesday, February 29, students are required to post TWO discussion questions on the assigned reading(s) for each class on Blackboard. Discussion questions are due by 8 am on the day of class. Students are expected to post discussion questions for 15 of the 17 discussion days; in other words, you may opt to not write questions for two classes of your choice. The discussion questions for each class are worth 1% of your final grade, for a total of 15%. They will be marked on a complete/incomplete basis, with complete questions receiving an A and incomplete questions receiving a zero. Contextual Presentation and Summary/Bibliography Each student will be responsible for presenting one ten-minute in-class presentation on a topic related to the course material; topics for each class meeting are listed on the weekly schedule below and a sign-up sheet for these presentations will be circulated on the first day of class.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS AMERICAN PLAYS by CLIFFORD ODETS and OTHER PLAYWRIGHTS DURING 1930S
    IMPACT: International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature (IMPACT: IJRHAL) ISSN (P): 2347-4564; ISSN (E): 2321-8878 Vol. 6, Issue 4, Apr 2018, 51-56 © Impact Journals CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS AMERICAN PLAYS BY CLIFFORD ODETS AND OTHER PLAYWRIGHTS DURING 1930s G. Visalam Head, Department of English, Sri Muthukumaran Arts and Science College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India Received: 31 Mar 2018 Accepted: 04 Apr 2018 Published: 07 Apr 2018 ABSTRACT American Plays had a tremendous response during 1930s and several genre of plays were staged at all corners of America and the Americans were fond of enacting and viewing the plays. The genre of plays will vary based on the American people mindset and the political situations. Several playwrights followed Hollywood techniques for writing their scripts. The role of playwright was found to be more vital than the role of an actor or the Director or the Production Company. The contribution of the playwrights during 1930s was considered to be a trend setting period in changing the roles of a writer from technician to becoming an artist. KEYWORDS : Playwright, Writer, Script, Actor, Play, Drama, Theatre INTRODUCTION During the 1930s, the playwrights followed Hollywood’s technique for paying writers for their scripts. Theatres such as Group Theatre and the Theatre Guild supported this idea to consider writers as autonomous artists whose function was very important than any other member of the company. The scripts were sold on the basis of their value, but they were written without the specific actor, particular director or any theatres in mind. Thus the Star System of Pre-World War came to an end, by giving importance to the playwright.
    [Show full text]
  • T Wentieth Centur Y North Amer Ican Drama
    TWENTIETH CENTURY NORTH AMERICAN DRAMA, SECOND EDITION learn more at at learn more alexanderstreet.com Twentieth Century North American Drama, Second Edition Twentieth Century North American Drama, Second Edition contains 1,900 plays from the United States and Canada. In addition to providing a comprehensive full-text resource for students in the performing arts, the collection offers a unique window into the econom- ic, historical, social, and political psyche of two countries. Scholars and students who use the database will have a new way to study the signal events of the twentieth century – including the Depression, the role of women, the Cold War, and more – through the plays and performances of writers who lived through these decades. More than 1,250 of the works are in copyright and licensed Jules Feiffer, Neil LaBute, Moisés Kaufman, Lee Breuer, Richard from the authors or their estates, and 1,700 plays appear in Foreman, Stephen Adly Guirgis, Horton Foote, Romulus Linney, no other Alexander Street collection. At least 550 of the works David Mamet, Craig Wright, Kenneth Lonergan, David Ives, Tina have never been published before, in any format, and are Howe, Lanford Wilson, Spalding Gray, Anna Deavere Smith, Don available only in Twentieth Century North American Drama, DeLillo, David Rabe, Theresa Rebeck, David Henry Hwang, and Second Edition – including unpublished plays by major writers Maria Irene Fornes. and Pulitzer Prize winners. Besides the mainstream works, users will find a number of plays Important works prior to 1920 are included, with the concentration of particular social significance, such as the “people’s theatre” of works beginning with playwrights such as Eugene O’Neill, exemplified in performances by The Living Theatre and The Open Elmer Rice, Sophie Treadwell, and Susan Glaspell in the 1920s Theatre.
    [Show full text]
  • April Quill 2013 Template.Indd
    The Quill, April, 2013 5 No. 20, Vol. See The Quill online at www.centenarycollege.edu/thequill Notice anything strange yet?? Money back, guaranteed! By Clarissa Anderson Centenary Starting in the fall, Centenary College will be running a financial program to get fro- called “Fast Track,” which guarantees the funding of zen yogurt students’ education. Students who location achieve over a 3.7 GPA will be reimbursed their full By Loren Kessell tuition. Those who qualify A long night of New, off-campus dorm planned for this program must sign a studying ahead, and the clock contract stating their dedica- keeps ticking? Your brain By Kathryn Nieves tion to their education. Many is sluggish, and things seem Increased student people say this tactic is a ploy hopeless. Something sweet kitchen, and a living room. Funding for the dorm enrollment on campus has to increase students’ academ- might get the energy flowing. The style of the building was provided by a donor caused a housing issue. The ic success; others say bribing There is good news. will also replicate the two whose name has not yet solution? The college will is not the answer. Centenary College already- standing apartment been released. However, it build a new dorm. But the “Fast Track” plans to add a new hang-out buildings. However, rather is likely that the name will Currently, there are eight program guarantees your for the student body. Re- than having three floors, this appear on a sign on the front on campus: two freshman money back, so why not cently, the frozen yogurt building will have five.
    [Show full text]
  • The Female Gothic in Susan Glaspell's the Morning Is Near Us
    The Function of the Gothic in Susan Glaspell’s The Morning Is Near Us I. Susan Glaspell Susan Glaspell (1876-1948) was a prolific writer whose work spans the genres of drama, short fiction, and novels. She “along with her husband George Cram Cook, and, later, Eugene O’Neill—established the Provincetown Players, the first modern American theater company” (Ben Zvi 1). Prominent theater critics of her day and age, Issac Goldberg, Heywood Broun, and Ludwig Lewisohn, cite Glaspell as the mother of American drama. She wrote eleven plays for the group, giving them their first commercial success with “Trifles” (Ben Zvi 1; Ozieblo 2). In 1931, she won a Pulitzer for her play, Alison’s House, and during her lifetime, her short stories were published in journals like Harpers, The Black Cat, and Ladies Home Journal. Three of her novels made best sellers lists and were praised highly by the New York Times; however, despite her success and popularity during her lifetime, Glaspell’s works were largely forgotten about and left out of the American literary canon. Martha Carpentier explains, “This solid body of work should have ensured her place in the annals of American fiction, but Susan Glaspell is a classic case study of gender-biased marginalization” (2). Rather, Glaspell’s body of work follows the trajectory of many women writers, as Linda Ben-Zvi elucidates, she “was well known in her time, effaced from canonical consideration after her death, and rediscovered years later through the resurfacing of one work, around which critical attention has been focused” (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Canonicity and the American Public Library: the Case of American Women Writers
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and... Canonicity and the American Public Library: The Case of American Women Writers Sarah Wadsworth Abstract Beginning with an overview of the debate over American women writers and the academic canon, this essay inventories four clusters of American women writers—domestic novelists, regionalists, mod- ernists, and writers of diverse ethnicities—within a representative sampling of small-town public libraries across the Midwest from the late nineteenth to the mid-twentieth century. The survey reveals some surprising disjunctures that run counter to trends in the academy. It also highlights the role publishers and bibliographers have played in establishing favored texts for a general readership and demon- strates that publishers of literary classics and bibliographies geared toward librarians have not always promoted the same texts as their academic counterparts. On the whole, it concludes, women writ- ers fared quite well in the hands of publishers and public libraries promoting “the classics” at the same time that they suffered at the hands of major textbook publishers and scholarly editors intent on defining “the canon.” At the 1981 Modern Language Association annual convention, a “New American Literary History” forum sponsored a special session on the topic “A New American Literature Anthology.” Led by Judith Fetterley and Joan Schulz of the MLA’s Commission on the Status of Women, the session sparked a lively dialogue on the neglect of women writers in Amer- ican literature. The commission had recently undertaken a study of the representation of works by women in standard classroom anthologies, and the results were discouraging.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2015 Issue of the Foundation’S Newsletter
    April 2015 SOCIETY BOARD PRESIDENT Jeff Kennedy [email protected] VICE PRESIDENT J. Chris Westgate [email protected] SECRETARY/TREASURER Beth Wynstra [email protected] INTERNATIONAL SECRETARY – ASIA: Haiping Liu [email protected] INTERNATIONAL SECRETARY – Provincetown Players Centennial, 4-5 The Iceman Cometh at BAM, 6-7 EUROPE: Marc Maufort [email protected] GOVERNING BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHAIR: Steven Bloom [email protected] Jackson Bryer [email protected] Michael Burlingame [email protected] Robert M. Dowling [email protected] Thierry Dubost [email protected] Eugene O’Neill puppet at presentation of Monte Cristo Award to Nathan Lane, 8-9 Eileen Herrmann [email protected] Katie Johnson [email protected] What’s Inside Daniel Larner President’s message…………………..2-3 ‘Exorcism’ Reframed ……………….12-13 [email protected] Provincetown Players Centennial…….4-5 Member News………………….…...14-17 Cynthia McCown The Iceman Cometh/BAM……….……..6-7 Honorary Board of Directors..……...…17 [email protected] The O’Neill, Monte Cristo Award…...8-9 Members lists: New, upgraded………...17 Anne G. Morgan Comparative Drama Conference….10-11 Eugene O’Neill Foundation, Tao House: [email protected] Calls for Papers…………………….….11 Artists in Residence, Upcoming…...18-19 David Palmer Eugene O’Neill Review…………….….12 Contributors…………………………...20 [email protected] Robert Richter [email protected] EX OFFICIO IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT The Eugene O’Neill Society Kurt Eisen [email protected] Founded 1979 • eugeneoneillsociety.org THE EUGENE O’NEILL REVIEW A nonprofit scholarly and professional organization devoted to the promotion and Editor: William Davies King [email protected] study of the life and works of Eugene O’Neill and the drama and theatre for which NEWSLETTER his work was in large part the instigator and model.
    [Show full text]
  • THE POLITICS of THORNTON WILDER's DRAMA by Wesley
    “IMPORTANT THINGS TO GIVE EACH OTHER”: THE POLITICS OF THORNTON WILDER’S DRAMA By Wesley Stewart Longacre B.A., Baylor University, 2004 M.A., Wake Forest University, 2013 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Theatre & Dance 2017 This thesis entitled: “Important Things to Give Each Other”: The Politics of Thornton Wilder’s Drama has been approved for the Department of Theatre and Dance Dr. Oliver Gerland Dr. Beth Osnes Date The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation ABSTRACT Longacre, Wesley (Ph.D., Theatre) “Important Things to Give Each Other”: The Politics of Thornton Wilder’s Drama Thesis directed by Associate Professor Oliver Gerland Thornton Wilder (1897-1975) was one of the most celebrated U.S. authors of the 20th century. As a dramatist, he wrote one of the most frequently produced plays in American dramatic history, Our Town. Given his fame, it is surprising that very little has been written about Wilder’s dramatic works from a political perspective. My dissertation aims to address this oversight by unearthing a family-based social and political ethic in his dramatic works. Through close study of his plays, interviews, letters, influences, and other writings, I have found that he promotes a democratic ethic through his drama. He creates the utopia that he longed to see in our global political climate and imagines what the world would look like if we truly ascribed to democratic ideals.
    [Show full text]
  • An Exploration of Doppelganger As Found in the Music and Text Of
    ii © 2008 Terri L. Brown All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Jonathan L. Chambers, Advisor This study explores the use of, and reaction to, the music used in Susan Glaspell’s The Verge. Through close textual and musical analysis, and by extension, historical investigation, the argument is made that Glaspell’s The Verge is a virtual “shadow” play, or doppelganger, of Jacques Offenbach’s opera The Tales of Hoffman, from which some of the music is taken. The exploration further contends that through the use of the hymn, Nearer, My God, To Thee, by Lowell Mason and Sarah Flower Adams, Glaspell also extends a vision of gender relations that reaches far beyond Hoffman’s misogynistic, patriarchal space insofar as it creates a compellingly powerful religious viewpoint: an embodiment of the Christian Godhead, as a precursor to the late twentieth century social and existential feminist perspective. iv The dissertation is dedicated to my wonderful husband and eternal companion David, and my two beautiful daughters, Madison and Mackenzie, who have personally sacrificed more than anyone could ever know to help me achieve my personal goals. I will be forever grateful to each of you, now and always. v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank all those who have helped me complete this monumental task: to Jonathan Chambers for being not only a great advisor, teacher, writer, and scholar, but for being a wonderful human being throughout the process; to Ronald Shields and Lesa Lockford for helping me believe that I could actually do this; to Scott Robinson, Department Chair of Theatre Arts at Central Washington University, for his constant support, both personally and professionally – I will follow you anywhere; to Leslee Caul, my incredibly talented editor, and colleague – but most of all, my friend.
    [Show full text]
  • Martha C. Carpentier Is Susan Glaspell's Fiction Simply Not As
    APOLLONIAN FORM AND DIONYSIAN EXCESS IN SUSAN GLASPELL’S DRAMA AND FICTION Martha C. Carpentier Is Susan Glaspell’s fiction simply not as good as her drama? Was she inspired by her thrilling environment during those years with Jig and Gene and the Provincetown to produce work that exceeded her native capabilities? Or is this merely a persistent critical shibboleth lingering from the days when it was considered necessary to create such hierarchies as “major” vs. “minor,” “cosmopolitan” vs. “regional,” “experimental” vs. “sentimental”? It seems more accurate to observe that a writer who, within the space of one year (1916-1917), wrote a play (Trifles) and a short story (“Jury of Her Peers”) narrating the same events with the same characters and with equal success in both dramatic and fictional forms, was not only profoundly interested in generic intertextuality, but was able to move between these genres with rare facility. This unique ability of Susan Glaspell’s does not end with those two works. As evidenced by her 1916 story, “Unveiling Brenda,” and similar 1917 play, Close the Book; her 1917 one-act play, The Outside, and “A Rose in the Sand,” its 1927 short story version; her 1919 story, “Pollen,” progenitor of the 1920 play, Inheritors; as well as the 1922 play, Chains of Dew, and its 1931 novel version, Ambrose Holt and Family, Glaspell often stretched generic boundaries by transposing and experimenting with the same narrative in two genres. Examining the connections between her work in different genres presents a far more interesting critical challenge than assuming her work cannot be equally good in two genres, then imposing a critical hierarchy in order to make the work fit the assumption.
    [Show full text]
  • "Murder, She Wrote": the Genesis of Susan Glaspell's "Trifles" Author(S): Linda Ben-Zvi Source: Theatre Journal, Vol
    "Murder, She Wrote": The Genesis of Susan Glaspell's "Trifles" Author(s): Linda Ben-Zvi Source: Theatre Journal, Vol. 44, No. 2, American Scenes (May, 1992), pp. 141-162 Published by: The Johns Hopkins University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3208736 Accessed: 23/05/2010 22:00 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=jhup. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Johns Hopkins University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Theatre Journal. http://www.jstor.org "Murder, She Wrote": The Genesis of Susan Glaspell's Trifles Linda Ben-Zvi In the preface to her book WomenWho Kill, Ann Jones explains that her massive study of women murderers began with a quip.
    [Show full text]