DOCSLIB.ORG

American Theatre and Drama Eugene O'neill and His Contemporaries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
American Theatre and Drama Eugene O'neill and His Contemporaries Theatre 365-1: American Theatre and Drama Eugene O’Neill and His Contemporaries Monday/Wednesday 9:30-10:50am, Parkes Hall 215 Instructor: Shannon K. Fitzsimons ([email protected]) Office Hours: By appointment Course Description This course will examine American drama and theatre history from 1915 to 1945 through the stylistically diverse career of Eugene O'Neill, the only American dramatist to win the Nobel Prize for Literature. Special emphasis will be placed on O'Neill's early career with the Provincetown Players, the expressionistic experiments of the 1920s, social dramas of the Depression years, and finally, the realist family dramas of the 1940s. Playwrights (besides O'Neill) to be studied include Susan Glaspell, Elmer Rice, Sophie Treadwell, Gertrude Stein, Marc Blitzstein, Clifford Odets, Tennessee Williams, and Arthur Miller. Assignments Discussion Questions Beginning with class on Wednesday, January 4, and continuing through class on Wednesday, February 29, students are required to post TWO discussion questions on the assigned reading(s) for each class on Blackboard. Discussion questions are due by 8 am on the day of class. Students are expected to post discussion questions for 15 of the 17 discussion days; in other words, you may opt to not write questions for two classes of your choice. The discussion questions for each class are worth 1% of your final grade, for a total of 15%. They will be marked on a complete/incomplete basis, with complete questions receiving an A and incomplete questions receiving a zero. Contextual Presentation and Summary/Bibliography Each student will be responsible for presenting one ten-minute in-class presentation on a topic related to the course material; topics for each class meeting are listed on the weekly schedule below and a sign-up sheet for these presentations will be circulated on the first day of class. Students are encouraged to meet with me as they are preparing their presentations to discuss possible approaches/sources. These presentations will be the product of independent research and should be succinct, rich in information, clearly organized, and well-rehearsed, both with regards to content and to time limit. Presentations that go over the ten-minute mark will be stopped; it is in your best interest to practice your presentation before class. Students are encouraged to use audio-visual aids (handouts, Powerpoint presentations, sound or video clips) to enhance their presentations as appropriate; please make arrangements in advance to have the proper equipment set up for your presentation. In addition to the oral presentation, each student is expected to prepare a written three-page summary of their findings, along with a bibliography of five sources. These sources may include: biographies, academic books/book chapters, academic journal articles, newspaper articles/reviews from original productions, plays (other than those assigned for class) and videorecordings of performances or film adaptations (with instructor’s approval). It may not include encyclopedia entries or material from popular websites (unless advance written permission is given by the instructor). The presenter should bring hard copies of their summary/bibliography for each course member and the instructor to class on the day of their presentation. Collectively, these summaries will provide an excellent set of contextual notes for each student to take away at the end of the course. The presentation, summary and bibliography are worth 25 percent of the final grade. Director’s Concept Presentation In Week 10 of the quarter, each student will present an 8-minute director’s concept presentation for a hypothetical production of one of the plays we have studied in the course (or another play by one of the playwrights we have studied, with instructor’s approval). Please email me with your choice of play by Monday, February 20th. The schedule for the presentations is included in the weekly schedule below. In the interests of getting everyone’s presentation done during the last week of class, and not using our final exam period the following week, each presentation will be limited to 8 minutes and those that run over will be interrupted. As with the contextual presentations, advance rehearsal is strongly encouraged. A successful presentation will address the following questions: What are the particular challenges and benefits of presenting this play now? What is the relationship between the present moment and the time when the play was originally produced (and, if markedly different, the time in which the play is set)? What choices in setting, staging, design, and performance style will you make to address those challenges/points of connection in your production? What story are you trying to tell/what ideas are you trying to express through your production? The use of visual materials (inspiration images/sketches for costumes, set, etc.) will be extremely helpful in communicating your ideas to the class; depending on your concept for your production, you may find audio aids helpful as well. The director’s concept presentation is worth 15% of your final grade. Director’s Concept Statement The director’s concept statement (5-7 pages) will address the same questions as the director’s presentation, but in greater depth than that allowed in eight minutes; it should not simply be a transcription of your presentation. You may find it helpful to draw on scholarly resources about/reviews of the play you are directing to support your ideas; the bibliographies from your peer’s contextual summaries may prove handy here! In addition, you should detail your interpretive, staging and design approach to TWO specific scenes in your play; in plays with long acts rather than short scenes, simply indicate the page numbers from the editions used in class and describe the major action of the scene (for example, “Biff and Willy’s fight on pages 47-51” for Death of a Salesman). You will want to provide scanned copies or photographs of your visual materials from the in-class presentation to accompany your statement. The statements are due via email on TUESDAY, MARCH 13 by 5 PM. They are worth 25% of your final grade. Assessment Breakdown Class Attendance/Participation: 20% Discussion Questions: 15% Contextual Presentation/Summary and Bibliography: 25% Director’s Concept Presentation: 15% Director’s Concept Statement: 25% Assessment Standards A Superior work demonstrating student’s ability to engage the materials in a stimulating, creative, and insightful manner; clearly written with no or minimal typographical or grammatical errors B Completion of requirements demonstrating student’s understanding of materials and ability to apply knowledge; minor writing and/or conceptual problems C Satisfactory completion of assignment requirements; lacks clear writing or has significant conceptual problems, and/or is inadequately proof-read D Failure to meet majority of requirements of the assignment F Failure to meet all requirements of the assignment Grading Scale A 93-100 C 73-76 A- 90-92 C- 70-72 B+ 87-89 D+ 67-69 B 83-86 D 63-66 B- 80-82 D- 60-62 C+ 77-79 F 59 and below Course Policies Formatting. All written work will be submitted by email to [email protected] by the time specified on the due date. Written work should always be submitted in the following format: 12 point font, Times New Roman, double-spaced in MLA style only, in .doc, .docx, or PDF format. Attendance. Attendance is mandatory. Because of our limited time together, it is important that you make every effort to attend class and arrive on time. Note that being tardy three times will count as one absence. Appropriate proof is necessary in order for an absence to be excused (e.g. doctor’s note, letter from the Dean). You are allowed one unexcused absence, no questions asked. After that, your final grade for the course will drop one increment for each missed class (from an A- to a B+). Missing more than three classes is grounds for failure for the course. Participation. The success of this course relies on your active participation. In addition to completing the readings and assignments, you are expected to engage regularly in class discussion. Come prepared to share your questions and insights. Active participation is equal parts listening and speaking. Not only do you earn a grade for participation, your ability to do well and achieve in this course is impacted greatly by the critical sharing of your ideas. A note about electronic devices: You are welcome to use your laptop in class during your presentations and/or to take notes. However, checking your email, updating your Facebook status, and sending instant messages means that you are absent from class—you are specifically discouraged from keeping your e-mail or social networking sites on your screen behind your notes. These absences will have the same impact on your final grade as the absences outlined above. Late Work: Late assignments will be lowered one letter grade increment per day (from an A- to a B if it is two days late). Students are allowed one extension of 24 hours to complete one written assignment. Inform the instructor by email on the day the assignment is due if you plan to take advantage of this policy; no questions will be asked. No extensions will be granted for in-class presentations. Missing class on the day of your presentation will result in a failing grade for that assignment. Note: It is a good idea to review your syllabi at the beginning of the quarter in order to identify
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lntertextuality in AMERICAN DRAMA Critical Essays on Eugene 0 'Neill, Susan Glaspell, Thornton Wilder, -~Arthur Miller and Other Playwrights
    lNTERTEXTUALITY IN AMERICAN DRAMA Critical Essays on Eugene 0 'Neill, Susan Glaspell, Thornton Wilder, -~Arthur Miller and Other Playwrights Edited by Drew Eisenhauer and Brenda Murphy McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers Jefferson, North Carolina, and London Table of Contents Introduction: What Is "'ntertextuality" and Why Is the Term Important Today? DREW EISENHAUER .......................... 1 Part I: Literary Intertextuality LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGUING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA SECTION ONE: PoETS Intertextuality in American drama : critical essays on Eugene O'Neill, Susan Glaspell, Thornton Wilder, Arthur Miller The Ancient Mariner and O'Neill's Intertextual Epiphany and other playwrights I edited by Drew Eisenhauer and (Herman Daniel Farrell III) ............................... 10 Brenda Murphy. p. em. "Deep in my silent sea": Eugene O'Neill's Extended Includes bibliographical references and index. Adaptation of Coleridge's The Ancient Mariner ISBN 978-0-7864-6391-6 (Rupendra Guha Majumdar) ............................... 25 softcover : acid free paper § A Multi-Faceted Moon: Shakespearean and Keatsian Echoes 1. American drama- 20th century- History in Eugene O'Neill's A Moon for the Misbegotten and criticism. 2. O'Neill, Eugene, 1888-1953- (Aurelie Sanchez) ........................................ 36 Criticism and interpretation. 3. Glaspell, Susan, 1876-1948- Criticism and interpretation. Trailing Clouds of Glory: Glaspell, Romantic Ideology 4. Wilder, Thornton, 1897-1975- Criticism and Cultural Conflict in Modern American Literature and interpretation. 5. Miller, Arthur, 1915-2005- Criticism and interpretation. 6. Intertextuality. (Michael Winetsky) ...................................... 52 I. Eisenhauer, Drew. II. Murphy, Brenda, 1950- On Closets and Graves: Intertextualities in Susan Glaspell's PS350.I58 2013 Alison's House and Emily Dickinson's Poetry 812'.509-dc23 2012038662 (Noelia Hernando-Real) .................................
    [Show full text]
  • CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS AMERICAN PLAYS by CLIFFORD ODETS and OTHER PLAYWRIGHTS DURING 1930S
    IMPACT: International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature (IMPACT: IJRHAL) ISSN (P): 2347-4564; ISSN (E): 2321-8878 Vol. 6, Issue 4, Apr 2018, 51-56 © Impact Journals CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS AMERICAN PLAYS BY CLIFFORD ODETS AND OTHER PLAYWRIGHTS DURING 1930s G. Visalam Head, Department of English, Sri Muthukumaran Arts and Science College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India Received: 31 Mar 2018 Accepted: 04 Apr 2018 Published: 07 Apr 2018 ABSTRACT American Plays had a tremendous response during 1930s and several genre of plays were staged at all corners of America and the Americans were fond of enacting and viewing the plays. The genre of plays will vary based on the American people mindset and the political situations. Several playwrights followed Hollywood techniques for writing their scripts. The role of playwright was found to be more vital than the role of an actor or the Director or the Production Company. The contribution of the playwrights during 1930s was considered to be a trend setting period in changing the roles of a writer from technician to becoming an artist. KEYWORDS : Playwright, Writer, Script, Actor, Play, Drama, Theatre INTRODUCTION During the 1930s, the playwrights followed Hollywood’s technique for paying writers for their scripts. Theatres such as Group Theatre and the Theatre Guild supported this idea to consider writers as autonomous artists whose function was very important than any other member of the company. The scripts were sold on the basis of their value, but they were written without the specific actor, particular director or any theatres in mind. Thus the Star System of Pre-World War came to an end, by giving importance to the playwright.
    [Show full text]
  • T Wentieth Centur Y North Amer Ican Drama
    TWENTIETH CENTURY NORTH AMERICAN DRAMA, SECOND EDITION learn more at at learn more alexanderstreet.com Twentieth Century North American Drama, Second Edition Twentieth Century North American Drama, Second Edition contains 1,900 plays from the United States and Canada. In addition to providing a comprehensive full-text resource for students in the performing arts, the collection offers a unique window into the econom- ic, historical, social, and political psyche of two countries. Scholars and students who use the database will have a new way to study the signal events of the twentieth century – including the Depression, the role of women, the Cold War, and more – through the plays and performances of writers who lived through these decades. More than 1,250 of the works are in copyright and licensed Jules Feiffer, Neil LaBute, Moisés Kaufman, Lee Breuer, Richard from the authors or their estates, and 1,700 plays appear in Foreman, Stephen Adly Guirgis, Horton Foote, Romulus Linney, no other Alexander Street collection. At least 550 of the works David Mamet, Craig Wright, Kenneth Lonergan, David Ives, Tina have never been published before, in any format, and are Howe, Lanford Wilson, Spalding Gray, Anna Deavere Smith, Don available only in Twentieth Century North American Drama, DeLillo, David Rabe, Theresa Rebeck, David Henry Hwang, and Second Edition – including unpublished plays by major writers Maria Irene Fornes. and Pulitzer Prize winners. Besides the mainstream works, users will find a number of plays Important works prior to 1920 are included, with the concentration of particular social significance, such as the “people’s theatre” of works beginning with playwrights such as Eugene O’Neill, exemplified in performances by The Living Theatre and The Open Elmer Rice, Sophie Treadwell, and Susan Glaspell in the 1920s Theatre.
    [Show full text]
  • Scenes from Opera and Musical Theatre
    LEON WILSON CLARK OPERA SERIES SHEPHERD SCHOOL OPERA presents an evening of SCENES FROM OPERA AND MUSICAL THEATRE Debra Dickinson, stage director Thomas Jaber, musical director and pianist January 30 and 31, February 1 and 2, 1998 7:30 p.m. Wortham Opera Theatre RICE UNNERSITY PROGRAM DER FREISCHOTZ Music by Carl Maria von Weber; libretto by Johann Friedrich Act II, scene 1: Schelm, halt' fest// Kommt ein schlanker Bursch gegangen. Agatha: Leslie Heal Annie: Laura D 'Angelo CANDIDE Music by Leonard Bernstein; lyrics by John Latouche, Dorothy Parker, Stephen Sondheim, Richard Wilbur OHappyWe Candide: Matthew Pittman Cunegonde: Sibel Demirmen \. THE THREEPENNY OPERA Music by Kurt Weill; lyrics by Bertolt Brecht The Jealousy Duet Lucy Brown: Aidan Soder Polly Peachum: Kristina Driskill MacHeath: Adam Feriend DON GIOVANNI Music by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart; libretto by Lorenzo Da Ponte Act I, scene 3: Laci darem la mano/Ah! fuggi ii traditor! Don Giovanni: Christopher Holloway Zerlina: Elizabeth Holloway Donna Elvira: Michelle Herbert STREET SCENE Music by Kurt Weill; lyrics by Elmer Rice Act/I Duet Rose: Adrienne Starr Sam: Matthew Pittman MY FAIR LADY Music by Frederick Loewe; lyrics by Alan Jay Lerner On the Street Where You Live/Show Me Freddy Eynsford Hill: David Ray Eliza Doolittle: Dawn Bennett LA BOHEME Music by Giacomo Puccini; libretto by Giuseppe Giacosa and Luigi Illica Act/II Mimi: Kristin Nelson Marcello: Matthew George Rodolfo: Creighton Rumph Musetta: Adrienne Starr Directed by Elizabeth Holloway INTERMISSION LE NOZZE DI FIGARO
    [Show full text]
  • April Quill 2013 Template.Indd
    The Quill, April, 2013 5 No. 20, Vol. See The Quill online at www.centenarycollege.edu/thequill Notice anything strange yet?? Money back, guaranteed! By Clarissa Anderson Centenary Starting in the fall, Centenary College will be running a financial program to get fro- called “Fast Track,” which guarantees the funding of zen yogurt students’ education. Students who location achieve over a 3.7 GPA will be reimbursed their full By Loren Kessell tuition. Those who qualify A long night of New, off-campus dorm planned for this program must sign a studying ahead, and the clock contract stating their dedica- keeps ticking? Your brain By Kathryn Nieves tion to their education. Many is sluggish, and things seem Increased student people say this tactic is a ploy hopeless. Something sweet kitchen, and a living room. Funding for the dorm enrollment on campus has to increase students’ academ- might get the energy flowing. The style of the building was provided by a donor caused a housing issue. The ic success; others say bribing There is good news. will also replicate the two whose name has not yet solution? The college will is not the answer. Centenary College already- standing apartment been released. However, it build a new dorm. But the “Fast Track” plans to add a new hang-out buildings. However, rather is likely that the name will Currently, there are eight program guarantees your for the student body. Re- than having three floors, this appear on a sign on the front on campus: two freshman money back, so why not cently, the frozen yogurt building will have five.
    [Show full text]
  • The Female Gothic in Susan Glaspell's the Morning Is Near Us
    The Function of the Gothic in Susan Glaspell’s The Morning Is Near Us I. Susan Glaspell Susan Glaspell (1876-1948) was a prolific writer whose work spans the genres of drama, short fiction, and novels. She “along with her husband George Cram Cook, and, later, Eugene O’Neill—established the Provincetown Players, the first modern American theater company” (Ben Zvi 1). Prominent theater critics of her day and age, Issac Goldberg, Heywood Broun, and Ludwig Lewisohn, cite Glaspell as the mother of American drama. She wrote eleven plays for the group, giving them their first commercial success with “Trifles” (Ben Zvi 1; Ozieblo 2). In 1931, she won a Pulitzer for her play, Alison’s House, and during her lifetime, her short stories were published in journals like Harpers, The Black Cat, and Ladies Home Journal. Three of her novels made best sellers lists and were praised highly by the New York Times; however, despite her success and popularity during her lifetime, Glaspell’s works were largely forgotten about and left out of the American literary canon. Martha Carpentier explains, “This solid body of work should have ensured her place in the annals of American fiction, but Susan Glaspell is a classic case study of gender-biased marginalization” (2). Rather, Glaspell’s body of work follows the trajectory of many women writers, as Linda Ben-Zvi elucidates, she “was well known in her time, effaced from canonical consideration after her death, and rediscovered years later through the resurfacing of one work, around which critical attention has been focused” (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Canonicity and the American Public Library: the Case of American Women Writers
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and... Canonicity and the American Public Library: The Case of American Women Writers Sarah Wadsworth Abstract Beginning with an overview of the debate over American women writers and the academic canon, this essay inventories four clusters of American women writers—domestic novelists, regionalists, mod- ernists, and writers of diverse ethnicities—within a representative sampling of small-town public libraries across the Midwest from the late nineteenth to the mid-twentieth century. The survey reveals some surprising disjunctures that run counter to trends in the academy. It also highlights the role publishers and bibliographers have played in establishing favored texts for a general readership and demon- strates that publishers of literary classics and bibliographies geared toward librarians have not always promoted the same texts as their academic counterparts. On the whole, it concludes, women writ- ers fared quite well in the hands of publishers and public libraries promoting “the classics” at the same time that they suffered at the hands of major textbook publishers and scholarly editors intent on defining “the canon.” At the 1981 Modern Language Association annual convention, a “New American Literary History” forum sponsored a special session on the topic “A New American Literature Anthology.” Led by Judith Fetterley and Joan Schulz of the MLA’s Commission on the Status of Women, the session sparked a lively dialogue on the neglect of women writers in Amer- ican literature. The commission had recently undertaken a study of the representation of works by women in standard classroom anthologies, and the results were discouraging.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2015 Issue of the Foundation’S Newsletter
    April 2015 SOCIETY BOARD PRESIDENT Jeff Kennedy [email protected] VICE PRESIDENT J. Chris Westgate [email protected] SECRETARY/TREASURER Beth Wynstra [email protected] INTERNATIONAL SECRETARY – ASIA: Haiping Liu [email protected] INTERNATIONAL SECRETARY – Provincetown Players Centennial, 4-5 The Iceman Cometh at BAM, 6-7 EUROPE: Marc Maufort [email protected] GOVERNING BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHAIR: Steven Bloom [email protected] Jackson Bryer [email protected] Michael Burlingame [email protected] Robert M. Dowling [email protected] Thierry Dubost [email protected] Eugene O’Neill puppet at presentation of Monte Cristo Award to Nathan Lane, 8-9 Eileen Herrmann [email protected] Katie Johnson [email protected] What’s Inside Daniel Larner President’s message…………………..2-3 ‘Exorcism’ Reframed ……………….12-13 [email protected] Provincetown Players Centennial…….4-5 Member News………………….…...14-17 Cynthia McCown The Iceman Cometh/BAM……….……..6-7 Honorary Board of Directors..……...…17 [email protected] The O’Neill, Monte Cristo Award…...8-9 Members lists: New, upgraded………...17 Anne G. Morgan Comparative Drama Conference….10-11 Eugene O’Neill Foundation, Tao House: [email protected] Calls for Papers…………………….….11 Artists in Residence, Upcoming…...18-19 David Palmer Eugene O’Neill Review…………….….12 Contributors…………………………...20 [email protected] Robert Richter [email protected] EX OFFICIO IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT The Eugene O’Neill Society Kurt Eisen [email protected] Founded 1979 • eugeneoneillsociety.org THE EUGENE O’NEILL REVIEW A nonprofit scholarly and professional organization devoted to the promotion and Editor: William Davies King [email protected] study of the life and works of Eugene O’Neill and the drama and theatre for which NEWSLETTER his work was in large part the instigator and model.
    [Show full text]
  • THE POLITICS of THORNTON WILDER's DRAMA by Wesley
    “IMPORTANT THINGS TO GIVE EACH OTHER”: THE POLITICS OF THORNTON WILDER’S DRAMA By Wesley Stewart Longacre B.A., Baylor University, 2004 M.A., Wake Forest University, 2013 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Theatre & Dance 2017 This thesis entitled: “Important Things to Give Each Other”: The Politics of Thornton Wilder’s Drama has been approved for the Department of Theatre and Dance Dr. Oliver Gerland Dr. Beth Osnes Date The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation ABSTRACT Longacre, Wesley (Ph.D., Theatre) “Important Things to Give Each Other”: The Politics of Thornton Wilder’s Drama Thesis directed by Associate Professor Oliver Gerland Thornton Wilder (1897-1975) was one of the most celebrated U.S. authors of the 20th century. As a dramatist, he wrote one of the most frequently produced plays in American dramatic history, Our Town. Given his fame, it is surprising that very little has been written about Wilder’s dramatic works from a political perspective. My dissertation aims to address this oversight by unearthing a family-based social and political ethic in his dramatic works. Through close study of his plays, interviews, letters, influences, and other writings, I have found that he promotes a democratic ethic through his drama. He creates the utopia that he longed to see in our global political climate and imagines what the world would look like if we truly ascribed to democratic ideals.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Gilding the Guild:' Art Theatre, the Broadway Revue, and Cultural
    KEL/ )!hh&,-Ç.(Afl]dd][lDaeal]\*()+ Klm\a]kafEmka[YdL`]Ylj] Ngdme]/FmeZ]j) *()+Afl]dd][lDl\9jla[d]&=f_dak`dYf_mY_]&\ga2)(&)+0.'kel&/&)&,-W) E9Q9;9FLM QYd]K[`ggdg^<jYeY Ë?ad\af_l`]?mad\Ì29jll`]Ylj]$ l`]:jgY\oYqj]nm]Yf\ [mdlmjYdhYjg\qafL`]?Yjja[c ?Ya]la]k )1*-Ç)1+(! 9:KLJ9;L C=QOGJ<K The legendary Garrick Gaieties revues of the mid-1920s are credited with launch- Broadway revue ing the Broadway careers of Richard Rodgers and Lorenz Hart, with developing the Rodgers and Hart style of the ‘sophisticated revue’ and with establishing Rodgers’ collaboration with Theatre Guild the Theatre Guild, which later produced Oklahoma! (1943) and Carousel (1945). art theatre Beyond these more familiar innovations, The Garrick Gaieties invites closer parody scrutiny for the series’ complex relationship with the Little Theatre and art theatre intertextuality movements of the 1920s, as represented by the Theatre Guild. Through cultural parody satirizing both the Theatre Guild and Broadway commercialism, the creators of The Garrick Gaieties of 1925, 1926 and 1930 not only used the revue form to destabilize cultural hierarchies and address tensions concerning art and commerce, but to bridge the distinct traditions of the Broadway musical and art theatre during the culturally dynamic years of the 1920s. The Garrick Gaieties revues of the mid-1920s are legendary for launching the Broadway careers of Richard Rodgers and Lorenz Hart. Bringing Rodgers and Hart ‘their first major recognition’ as a songwriting partnership (Hischak 2007: 92), these witty revues produced the team’s first nationally popular hits: ,- SMT_7.1_Cantu_45-60.indd 45 5/11/13 9:23:51 PM EYqY;Yflm the urban and bucolic odes ‘Manhattan’ and ‘Mountain Greenery’, respec- tively.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Syllabus
    BOROUGH OF MANHATTAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE The City University of New York Department of ENGLISH ​ Title of Course: Course Number: ENG 384 Class Hours per Week: 3 ENGLISH 384: MODERN AMERICAN Lab Hours: 0 ​ DRAMA Credits: 3 ​ A. Description ​ The development of the American theatre since the rise of realism is traced through 1920s dramas by O'Neill, Howard and Rice; comedies of manner by Barry and Behrman; socially conscious plays of the 1930s by Odets, Sherwood and Hellman; and post-war dramas by Williams and Miller. B. Prerequisites and/or Corequisites ​ English 201 or English 121 C. Student Outcomes ​ Students will ● Discuss course content in a range of critical contexts. ● Demonstrate knowledge of themes and genres of course texts. ● Critique the complexities and differences among course texts. D. Required Texts and/or Supplementary Materials ​ Some recommended texts are the following: Six Modern Plays, ed. A. Halline (Modern Library) ​ Plays from the Contemporary American Theater, ed. B. McNamara (Mentor) ​ Nine Plays by Black Women, ed. Margaret Wilkerson (Mentor) ​ Hispanic Theater in the U.S., N. Kanellos (Arte Publico) ​ Twenty-Three Plays: an Introductory Anthology, ed. O. Reinert (Scott, Foresman) ​ Famous American Plays of the 1930s, ed. Baym et al. (Laurel) ​ E. Evaluation and Requirements of Students ​ 124 Students will read about ten plays and discuss them in class, often reading passages aloud. Quizzes may be given on the most important reading assignments, or students may be asked to keep a journal recording their responses to key scenes and characters. A long term paper or a series of short essays will be assigned.
    [Show full text]
  • An Exploration of Doppelganger As Found in the Music and Text Of
    ii © 2008 Terri L. Brown All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Jonathan L. Chambers, Advisor This study explores the use of, and reaction to, the music used in Susan Glaspell’s The Verge. Through close textual and musical analysis, and by extension, historical investigation, the argument is made that Glaspell’s The Verge is a virtual “shadow” play, or doppelganger, of Jacques Offenbach’s opera The Tales of Hoffman, from which some of the music is taken. The exploration further contends that through the use of the hymn, Nearer, My God, To Thee, by Lowell Mason and Sarah Flower Adams, Glaspell also extends a vision of gender relations that reaches far beyond Hoffman’s misogynistic, patriarchal space insofar as it creates a compellingly powerful religious viewpoint: an embodiment of the Christian Godhead, as a precursor to the late twentieth century social and existential feminist perspective. iv The dissertation is dedicated to my wonderful husband and eternal companion David, and my two beautiful daughters, Madison and Mackenzie, who have personally sacrificed more than anyone could ever know to help me achieve my personal goals. I will be forever grateful to each of you, now and always. v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank all those who have helped me complete this monumental task: to Jonathan Chambers for being not only a great advisor, teacher, writer, and scholar, but for being a wonderful human being throughout the process; to Ronald Shields and Lesa Lockford for helping me believe that I could actually do this; to Scott Robinson, Department Chair of Theatre Arts at Central Washington University, for his constant support, both personally and professionally – I will follow you anywhere; to Leslee Caul, my incredibly talented editor, and colleague – but most of all, my friend.
    [Show full text]