<<

AA242B: MECHANICAL 1 / 41

AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS Analytical of Discrete Systems

These slides are based on the recommended textbook: M. G´eradinand D. Rixen, “Mechanical Vibrations: Theory and Applications to Structural Dynamics,” Second Edition, Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated, ISBN-13:9780471975465

1 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 2 / 41

Outline

1 Principle of Virtual for a Particle

2 Principle of for a System of N Particles

3 Hamilton’s Principle for Conservative Systems and Lagrange Equations

4 Lagrange Equations in the General Case

2 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 3 / 41 Principle of Virtual Work for a Particle

Particle m Particle T force vector f = [f1 f2 f3] force component fi , i = 1, ··· , 3 Particle T displacement vector u = [u1 u2 u3] displacement component ui , i = 1, ··· , 3 trajectory u(t) where t denotes

3 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 4 / 41 Principle of Virtual Work for a Particle

Particle virtual displacement arbitrary displacement u? (can be zero) virtual displacement δu = u? − u ⇒ arbitrary by definition family of arbitrary virtual displacements defined in a time-interval [t1, t2] and satisfying the variational constraints

δu(t1) = δu(t2) = 0

Important property d d du? du (δu ) = (u? − u ) = i − i =u ˙ ? − u˙ = δu˙ dt i dt i i dt dt i i i d d =⇒ (δ) = δ( ) (commutativity) dt dt

4 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 5 / 41 Principle of Virtual Work for a Particle

Equilibrium strong form

mu¨ − f = 0 ⇒ mu¨i − fi = 0, i = 1, ··· , 3

weak form

3 T X ∀δu, (δu )(mu¨ − f) = 0 ⇒ (mu¨i − fi )δui = 0 i=1

=⇒ (mu¨i − fi )δui = 0, i = 1, ··· , 3 δuT (mu¨ − f) = (mu¨ − f)T δu is homogeneous to a work =⇒ virtual work (δW ) Virtual work principle The virtual work produced by the effective acting on a particle during a virtual displacement is equal to zero

5 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 6 / 41 Principle of Virtual Work for a System of N Particles

N particles: k = 1, ··· , N Equilibrium mu¨k − fk = 0, k = 1, ··· , N ? Family of virtual displacements δuk = uk − uk satisfying the variational constraints

δuk (t1) = δuk (t2) = 0 (1)

Virtual work

N N X T X T mu¨k − fk = 0 ⇒ δuk (mu¨k − fk ) = (mu¨k − fk ) δuk = 0 k=1 k=1

6 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 7 / 41 Principle of Virtual Work for a System of N Particles

Conversely, ∀δuk compatible with the variational constraints (1)

N N 3 X T X X δuk (mu¨k − fk ) = 0 ⇒ (mk u¨ik − fik )δuik = 0 (2) k=1 k=1 i=1

If (2) is true ∀δuk compatible with (1) ⇒ (2) is true for T T T δuj = [1 0 0] (δuk = [0 0 0] for k 6= j), δuj = [0 1 0] T T (δuk = [0 0 0] for k 6= j), and δuj = [0 0 1] T (δuk = [0 0 0] for k 6= j), t ∈]t1, t2[

=⇒ mj u¨ij − fij = 0, i = 1, ··· , 3, j = 1, ··· , N

N ! X =⇒ mk u¨ik − fik = 0, i = 1, ··· , 3 k=1 If the virtual work equation is satisfied for any displacement compatible with the variational constraints, the system (of particles) is in dynamic equilibrium

7 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 8 / 41 Principle of Virtual Work for a System of N Particles

Major result

dynamic equilibrium ⇔ virtual work principle

8 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 9 / 41 Principle of Virtual Work for a System of N Particles Kinematic Constraints

In the absence of (kinematic) constraints, the state of a system of N particles can be defined by 3N displacement components

uik , i = 1, ··· , 3, k = 1, ··· N

Instantaneous configuration

ξik = xik + uik (x, t) ⇒ 3N dofs However, most mechanical systems incorporate some sort of constraints holonomic constraints non-holonomic constraints

9 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 10 / 41 Principle of Virtual Work for a System of N Particles Kinematic Constraints

Holonomic constraints two types

rheonomic constraints: defined by c(ξik , t) = 0 (no explicit dependence on any )

scleronomic constraints: defined by c(ξik ) = 0 (no explicit dependence on any velocity or time) a holonomic constraint reduces by 1 the number of dofs of a mechanical system example

3 P 2 2 rigidity ⇒ conservation of length ⇒ (ξi2 − ξi1 ) = l i=1

10 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 11 / 41 Principle of Virtual Work for a System of N Particles Kinematic Constraints Non-holonomic constraints ˙ defined by c(ξik , ξik , t) = 0 example

no slip ⇒ of point P = 0  x˙ = 0 − rφ˙ cos θ ⇒ x˙ + rφ˙ cos θ = 0 =⇒ 1 1 y˙1 = 0 + rφ˙ sin θ ⇒ y˙1 − rφ˙ sin θ = 0 in addition  x2 − x1 = r sin φ cos θ y2 − y1 = −r sin φ sin θ z2 − z1 = −r cos φ z1 = r

11 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 12 / 41 Principle of Virtual Work for a System of N Particles Kinematic Constraints

example (continue) hence, this system has

8 variables: x1, y1, z1, x2, y2, z2, θ, φ 4 holonomic constraints 2 non-holonomic constraints ˙ in general, c(ξik , ξik , t) = 0 is not integrable and therefore non-holonomic constraints do not reduce the number of dofs of a mechanical system therefore, the mechanical system in the above example (wheel) has 8 - 4 = 4 dofs 2 translations in the rolling plane 2

12 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 13 / 41 Principle of Virtual Work for a System of N Particles Generalized Displacements

Let n denote the number of dofs of a mechanical system: for example, for a system with N material points and R holonomic constraints, n = 3N − R The of this system are defined as the n configuration parameters (q1, q2, ··· , qn) in terms of which the displacements can be expressed as

uik (x, t) = Uik (q1, q2, ··· , qn, t)

If the system is not constrained by any non-holonomic constraint, then the generalized coordinates (q1, q2, ··· , qn) are independent: they can vary arbitrarily without violating the kinematic constraints

13 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 14 / 41 Principle of Virtual Work for a System of N Particles Generalized Displacements

Example

2 2 2 holonomic constraint HC1: ξ11 + ξ21 = l1 2 2 2 holonomic constraint HC2: (ξ12 − ξ11) + (ξ22 − ξ21) = l2 =⇒ 4 − 2 = 2dofs

one possible choice of (q1, q2) is (θ1, θ2)

 ξ = l cos θ ξ = l sin θ =⇒ 11 1 1 21 1 1 ξ12 = l1 cos θ1 + l2 cos(θ1 + θ2) ξ22 = l1 sin θ1 + l2 sin(θ1 + θ2)

14 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 15 / 41 Principle of Virtual Work for a System of N Particles Generalized Displacements

Virtual displacements

n X ∂Ui u (x, t) = U (q , q , ··· , q , t) ⇒ δu = k δq ik ik 1 2 n ik ∂q s s=1 s Virtual work equation

n " N 3 # X X X ∂Uik (mk u¨i k − fik ) δqs = 0 ∂qs s=1 k=1 i=1

n P Second term in above equation can be written as Qs δqs where s=1

N 3 X X ∂Uik Qs = fik ∂qs k=1 i=1

is the generalized force conjugate to qs

15 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 16 / 41 Hamilton’s Principle for Conservative Systems and Lagrange Equations

Sir (4 August 1805 - 2 September 1865)

Irish , astronomer, and mathematician contributions: classical , , and algebra (inventor of quaternions), and most importantly, reformulation of Newtonian mechanics (now called ) impact: modern study of , development of

16 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 17 / 41 Hamilton’s Principle for Conservative Systems and Lagrange Equations

Z t2 Hamilton’s principle: − virtual work principle = 0! t1

" N 3 # Z t2 X X − (mk u¨i k − fik )δuik dt = 0 t1 k=1 i=1

where δuik are arbitrary but compatible with eventual constraints and verify the end conditions (previously referred to as variational constraints)

17 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 18 / 41 Hamilton’s Principle for Conservative Systems and Lagrange Equations

First, assume that fk derives from a potential V(ξi ) — that is, fk is a

⇒ ∃ V(ξ1k , ξ2k , ξ3k ) / fk = −∇V(ξ1k , ξ2k , ξ3k )

Virtual work of fk

N 3 N 3 N 3 X X X X ∂V X X ∂V δW = fik δuik = − δuik = − δξik = −δV ∂ξi ∂ξi k=1 i=1 k=1 i=1 k k=1 i=1 k

n P δW = −δV and δW = Qs δqs s=1

∂V =⇒ Qs = − ∂qs

What about the virtual work of the forces?

18 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 19 / 41 Hamilton’s Principle for Conservative Systems and Lagrange Equations

Note that d (m u˙ δu ) = m u¨ δu + m u˙ δu˙ dt k i k ik k i k ik k i k i k 1 = m u¨ δu + δ( m u˙ 2 ) k i k ik 2 k i k d 1 =⇒ δW = m u¨ δu = (m u˙ δu ) − δ( m u˙ 2 ) k i k ik dt k i k ik 2 k i k The kinetic of a system of N particles can be defined as

N 3 1 X X T = m u˙ 2 2 k i k k=1 i=1

19 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 20 / 41 Hamilton’s Principle for Conservative Systems and Lagrange Equations

Hence, Hamilton’s principle for a conservative system can be written as

" N 3 # Z t2 X X − (mk u¨i k − fik )δuik dt = 0 t1 k=1 i=1 " N 3 # Z t2 X X d 1 Z t2 =⇒ − (m u˙ δu ) − δ( m u˙ 2 ) dt + (−δV)dt = 0 dt k i k ik 2 k i k t1 k=1 i=1 t1 N 3 X X Z t2 =⇒ − m u˙ δu t2 + δ (T − V)dt = 0 k i k ik t1 k=1 i=1 t1 Recall the generalized displacements

{qs } ⇒ uik (x, t) = Uik (qs , t) ⇒ u˙i k = h(qs , q˙s , t)

⇒ ξik = xik + uik (x, t) = xik + Uik (qs , t) = g(qs , t)

=⇒ T = T (q, q˙ , t) and V = V(q, t)

20 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 21 / 41 Hamilton’s Principle for Conservative Systems and Lagrange Equations

n X ∂Ui Note that u (x, t) = U (q , t) ⇒ δu = k δq ik ik s ik ∂q s s=1 s Now, recall the end conditions

δuik (t1) = 0 ⇒ δqs (t1) = 0 and δuik (t2) = 0 ⇒ δqs (t2) = 0

Therefore, Hamilton’s principle (HP) can be written as

Z t2 δ [T (q, q˙ , t) − V(q, t)] dt = 0 ∀ δq / δq(t1) = δq(t2) = 0 t1

where T q = [q1 q2 ··· qs ··· qn]

21 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 22 / 41 Hamilton’s Principle for Conservative Systems and Lagrange Equations

Equations of motion n X  ∂T ∂T  δT = δqs + δq˙s ∂qs ∂q˙s s=1 n X δV = − Qs δqs s=1 " n # Z t2 X ∂T  ∂T  HP → δq˙s + + Qs δqs dt = 0 ∂q˙s ∂qs t1 s=1 integrate by parts and apply the end conditions

n n Z t2   X ∂T t2 X d ∂T δqs t1 − δqs dt ∂q˙s dt ∂q˙s s=1 t1 s=1 n Z t2 X  ∂T  + + Qs δqs dt = 0 ∂qs t1 s=1

n Z t2 X  d  ∂T  ∂T  =⇒ − + + Qs δqs dt = 0 dt ∂q˙s ∂qs t1 s=1

22 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 23 / 41 Hamilton’s Principle for Conservative Systems and Lagrange Equations

The Lagrange

n Z t2 X d  ∂T  ∂T [ − + + Q ] δq dt = 0 dt ∂q˙ ∂q s s t1 s=1 s s

∀ δq / δq(t1) = δq(t2) = 0

d  ∂T  ∂T =⇒ − + + Qs = 0 dt ∂q˙s ∂qs

d  ∂T  ∂T − + : generalized inertia forces dt ∂q˙s ∂qs Qs : generalized internal and external forces

23 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 24 / 41 Hamilton’s Principle for Conservative Systems and Lagrange Equations

Joseph-Louis (Giuseppe Lodovico), comte de Lagrange (25 January 1736 - 10 April 1813)

Italian-born mathematician and astronomer contributions: analysis, number theory, and classical and succeeded Euler in 1766 as the director of mathematics at the Prussian Academy of Sciences in Berlin impact: his treatise on written in Berlin and first published in 1788 formed a basis for the development of mathematical in the 19th century moved to France in 1787 and became a member of the French Academy survived the French Revolution and became the first professor of analysis at the Ecole´ Polytechnique upon its opening in 1794

24 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 25 / 41 Hamilton’s Principle for Conservative Systems and Lagrange Equations

N P Equations of equilibrium mk u¨i k − fik = 0, i = 1, ··· , 3: simple, k=1 but can be difficult to formulate analytically for complex systems d  ∂T  ∂T Lagrange’s equations of motion − + + Qs = 0: more dt ∂q˙s ∂qs complex, but can simplify the analytical solution of complex dynamic problems

25 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 26 / 41 Hamilton’s Principle for Conservative Systems and Lagrange Equations Classification of Inertia Forces n X ∂Ui ∂Ui Recall u = U (q, t) ⇒ u˙ = k q˙ + k ik ik i k ∂q s ∂t s=1 s Substitute in the expression of the ⇒ T = T0(q, t) + T1(q, q˙ , t) + T2(q, q˙ , t) where T0, T1, and T2 are 1 homogeneous forms of degree 0, 1, and 2 inq ˙s , respectively, and are given by

N 3  2 1 X X ∂Ui T (q, t) = m k (transport kinetic energy) 0 2 k ∂t k=1 i=1 n N 3 X X X ∂Uik ∂Uik T1(q, q˙ , t) = mk q˙s (mutual kinetic energy) ∂t ∂qs s=1 k=1 i=1 n n N 3 1 X X X X ∂Uik ∂Uik T2(q, q˙ , t) = mk q˙s q˙r (relative kinetic energy) 2 ∂qs ∂qr s=1 r=1 k=1 i=1

1 G(q1, ··· , qn) is said to be a homogeneous function of degree p, where p is an p integer, if ∀α 6= 0, G(αq1, ··· , αqn) = α G(q1, ··· , qn) 26 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 27 / 41 Hamilton’s Principle for Conservative Systems and Lagrange Equations Classification of Inertia Forces

n ! X ∂G(q) From Euler’s theorem on homogeneous functions of degree p qi = pG(q) it ∂q s=1 i follows that n n X ∂T1 1 X ∂T2 T1 = q˙s and T2 = q˙s ∂q˙ 2 ∂q˙ s=1 s s=1 s Interpretation of the first two terms of the Lagrange equations

d  ∂T  ∂T d  ∂T1 ∂T2  ∂ − + = − + + (T0 + T1 + T2) dt ∂q˙s ∂qs dt ∂q˙s ∂q˙s ∂qs   n 2   ∂ ∂T1 X ∂ T1 d ∂T2 ∂ = − − q˙r − + (T0 + T1 + T2) ∂t ∂q˙ ∂q˙ ∂q dt ∂q˙ ∂q s r=1 s r s s              ∂ ∂T1 ∂T0   d ∂T2 ∂T2  = − +  + − +   ∂t ∂q˙ ∂q   dt ∂q˙ ∂q   s s   s s  | {z } | {z } transport relative      n ∂2T ∂T   X 1 1  + − q˙r +   ∂q˙s ∂qr ∂qs   r=1  | {z } complementary

27 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 28 / 41 Hamilton’s Principle for Conservative Systems and Lagrange Equations Classification of Inertia Forces

The transport inertia forces are those obtained by settingq ˙r = 0

∂ ∂T  ∂T =⇒ − 1 + 0 ∂t ∂q˙s ∂qs ∂U The relative inertia forces are those obtained by assuming ik = 0 ∂t d ∂T  ∂T =⇒ − 2 + 2 dt ∂q˙s ∂qs The complementary inertia forces are given by the remainder

n 2 X ∂ T1 ∂T1 =⇒ F = − q˙ + s ∂q˙ ∂q r ∂q r=1 s r s

28 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 29 / 41 Hamilton’s Principle for Conservative Systems and Lagrange Equations Classification of Inertia Forces n X ∂T1 Note that since T = q˙ 1 r ∂q˙ r=1 r

n 2 n 2 n 2 X ∂ T1 ∂T1 X ∂ T1 X ∂ T1 F = − q˙ + = − q˙ + q˙ s ∂q˙ ∂q r ∂q ∂q˙ ∂q r ∂q ∂q˙ r r=1 s r s r=1 s r r=1 s r n  2 2  n X ∂ T1 ∂ T1 X = − q˙ = g q˙ ∂q ∂q˙ ∂q ∂q˙ r rs r r=1 s r r s r=1

where the coefficients grs = −gsr do not depend on the velocitiesq ˙s , but only on the generalized displacements and time The complementary inertia forces have the nature of Coriolis or gyroscopic forces: because of the skew-symmetry of the coefficients grs , it follows that

n n n X X X Fs q˙s = grs q˙r q˙s = 0 s=1 s=1 r=1

29 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 30 / 41 Hamilton’s Principle for Conservative Systems and Lagrange Equations Classification of Inertia Forces

Leonhard Euler (15 April 1707 - 18 September 1783)

Swiss mathematician and physicist contributions: infinitesimal calculus and graph theory impact: mechanics, fluid dynamics, optics, and astronomy the asteroid 2002 Euler was named in his honor

30 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 31 / 41 Hamilton’s Principle for Conservative Systems and Lagrange Equations Energy Conservation in a System with Scleronomic Constraints

Assume here, until otherwise stated, that the generalized

displacements Uik are independent explicitly of time ⇒ T0 = T1 = 0 n n N 3 n 1 X X X X ∂Uik ∂Uik 1 X ∂T2 T = T2 = mk q˙s q˙r = q˙s 2 ∂qs ∂qr 2 ∂q˙s s=1 r=1 k=1 i=1 s=1 Differentiation with respect to time of the above expression leads to

n n dT X ∂T X d  ∂T  2 = q¨ + q˙ (3) dt s ∂q˙ s dt ∂q˙ s=1 s s=1 s From T = T (q, q˙ ) it follows that

n n dT X ∂T X ∂T = q¨ + q˙ (4) dt s ∂q˙ s ∂q s=1 s s=1 s

n dT X  d  ∂T  ∂T  (3) - (4) ⇒ = q˙ − dt s dt ∂q˙ ∂q s=1 s s

31 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 32 / 41 Hamilton’s Principle for Conservative Systems and Lagrange Equations Energy Conservation in a System with Scleronomic Constraints

n dT X  d  ∂T  ∂T  = q˙s − dt dt ∂q˙ ∂q s=1 s s

d  ∂T  ∂T From the Lagrange equations of motion (− + + Qs = 0), it follow that dt ∂q˙s ∂qs

n dT X = Qs q˙s dt s=1

For a system with scleronomic constraints, V = V(q) ∂V Since for conservative forces Qs = − , it follows that ∂qs

n n dT X X ∂V dV = Qs q˙s = − q˙s = − dt ∂q dt s=1 s=1 s

and therefore d (T + V) = 0 ⇔ E = T + V = cst dt

32 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 33 / 41 Hamilton’s Principle for Conservative Systems and Lagrange Equations Classification of Generalized Forces

Internal forces linking forces elastic forces dissipation forces (may have external origins too) External forces conservative forces non-conservative forces Both types of forces are said to be conservative if the associated virtual work is recoverable

33 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 34 / 41 Hamilton’s Principle for Conservative Systems and Lagrange Equations Classification of Generalized Forces

Linking forces

fi1 + fi2 = 0, i = 1, ··· , 3

3 3 P P virtual work: δW = fi1 δui1 + fi2 δui2 = fi1 (δui1 − δui2 ) i=1 i=1 for admissible virtual displacements – that is, virtual displacements that are compatible with the real displacements –

δui1 = δui2 ⇒ δW = 0 Linking forces do NOT contribute to the generalized forces acting on the global system

the above result is a nice aspect of

34 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 35 / 41 Hamilton’s Principle for Conservative Systems and Lagrange Equations Classification of Generalized Forces

Elastic forces produced work is storable in a recoverable form

internal energy Vint (uik ) N 3 X X ∂Vint δT = −δVint = − δuik ∂ui k=1 i=1 k n n X ∂Vint X Vint = Vint (q) ⇒ δT = −δVint = − δqs = Qs δqs ∂qs s=1 s=1

∂Vint =⇒ Qs = − ∂qs

35 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 36 / 41 Hamilton’s Principle for Conservative Systems and Lagrange Equations Classification of Generalized Forces

Dissipative forces remain parallel in opposite direction to the velocity vector v and are function of its s 3 P 2 modulus vk = u˙i k i=1 vk fk = −Ck fk (vk ) vk virtual work

N 3 n N 3 n X X X X X vik ∂uik X u = u(q, t) ⇒ δW = fi δui = − Ck fk (vk ) δqs = Qs δqs k k v ∂q k=1 i=1 s=1 k=1 i=1 k s s=1

N 3 X X vik ∂uik =⇒ Qs = − Ck fk (vk ) v ∂q k=1 i=1 k s n duik ∂uik X ∂uik ∂vik ∂uik since vi = = + q˙s and therefore = , it follows that k dt ∂t ∂q ∂q˙ ∂q s=1 s r r

N 3 N 3 ! X X vik ∂vik X fk (vk ) ∂ 1 X 2 Qs = − Ck fk (vk ) = − Ck v v ∂q˙ v ∂q˙ 2 ik k=1 i=1 k s k=1 k s i=1

N X ∂vk =⇒ Qs = − Ck fk (vk ) ∂q˙ k=1 s

36 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 37 / 41 Hamilton’s Principle for Conservative Systems and Lagrange Equations Classification of Generalized Forces

N X ∂vk Qs = − Ck fk (vk ) ∂q˙s k=1

N X Z vk (q˙ ) Dissipation function: D = Ck fk (γ)dγ k=1 0 From Leibniz’s integral rule ! d Z (b(t) Z b(t) ∂f db da f (x, t)dx = dx + f (b(t), t) − f (a(t), t) dt a(t) a(t) ∂t dt dt it follows that N ∂D X ∂vk ∂D = Ck fk (vk ) ⇒ Qs = − ∂q˙s ∂q˙s ∂q˙s k=1 n n X X ∂D Dissipated : P = Q q˙ = − q˙ s s s ∂q˙ s=1 s=1 s 37 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 38 / 41 Hamilton’s Principle for Conservative Systems and Lagrange Equations Classification of Generalized Forces

If D is assumed to be a homogeneous function of order p in the generalized , then

n n dT X dV X ∂D dV = Q q˙ = − − q˙ = − − pD dt s s dt s ∂q˙ dt s=1 s=1 s

d =⇒ (T + V) = −pD dt

p = 1: dry p = 2: viscous p = 3: aerodynamic

38 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 39 / 41 Hamilton’s Principle for Conservative Systems and Lagrange Equations Classification of Generalized Forces

Conservative external forces: these derive from a potential ∂Vext ⇒ ∃ Vext / Qs = − ∂qs ⇒ their virtual work during a cycle is zero I I I ∂Vext δW = Qs δqs = − δqs = − δVext = 0 ∂qs Non-conservative external forces

n N 3 3 N n X X X X X X ∂uik δW = Qs δqs = fik δuik = fik δqs ∂qs s=1 k=1 i=1 i=1 k=1 s=1

N 3 X X ∂uik =⇒ Qs = fik ∂qs k=1 i=1

39 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 40 / 41 Hamilton’s Principle for Conservative Systems and Lagrange Equations Classification of Generalized Forces

Summary: taking into account the non-conservative external forces, the power balance of a system solicited by internal and external forces can be written as

n d X (T + V) = −pD + Q q˙ dt s s s=1

40 / 41 AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS 41 / 41 Lagrange Equations in the General Case

In the general case of a non-conservative system with rheonomic constraints, the Lagrange equations of motion can be written as

d  ∂T  ∂T ∂V ∂D − + − − + Qs (t)=0 dt ∂q˙s ∂qs ∂qs ∂q˙s

where

V = Vext + Vint = total potential D = dissipation function

Qs (t) = non-conservative external generalized forces

They can also be written in terms of the inertia forces as follows

? d  ∂T2  ∂T2 ∂V ∂D ∂  ∂T1  − = Qs (t)− − + Fs − dt ∂q˙s ∂qs ∂qs ∂q˙s ∂t ∂q˙s

where

? V = V − T0 = potential modified by the tranport kinetic energy n X Fs = grs q˙r = generalized gyroscopic forces r=1

41 / 41