DOCSLIB.ORG

Colorado Plant Communities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Colorado Plant Communities Floristic Quality Assessment Indices for Colorado Plant Communities May 29, 2007 Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University 254 General Services Building Fort Collins, CO 80523 Floristic Quality Assessment Indices for Colorado Plant Communities Prepared for: Colorado Department of Natural Resources Division of Wildlife, Wetlands Program 6060 Broadway Denver, CO 80216 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202-1129 Principal Author: Joe Rocchio Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University 254 General Services Building Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 Colorado Floristic Quality Assessment Panel Dave Anderson1, David Buckner2, Kathy Carsey3, Dina Clark4, Janet Coles5, Denise Culver6, Craig Freeman7, Brad Johnson8, Steve Kettler9, Gwen Kittel10, Peggy Lyon11, Joe Rocchio12, Harvey Sprock13, and Gerould Wilhelm14 (moderator) Cover photograph: Pedicularis groenlandica, Castilleja rhexifolia, Carex aquatilis, Clementsia rhodantha, and Arnica mollis. Photo by Joe Rocchio. Copyright © 2007 Colorado State University Colorado Natural Heritage Program All Rights Reserved 1 Colorado Natural Heritage Program 2 ESCO Associates, Inc. 3 U.S. Forest Service 4 Botanical consultant 5 U.S. National Park Service 6 Colorado Natural Heritage Program 7 Kansas Natural Heritage Inventory 8 Colorado State University 9 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 10 NatureServe 11 Colorado Natural Heritage Program 12 Colorado Natural Heritage Program 13 U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service 14 Conservation Design Forum, Inc. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The primary objective of the Clean Water Act is to "maintain and restore the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation's waters," which includes wetlands. Wetlands in Colorado have not only been lost from the landscape but have and continue to be impacted or degraded by multiple human activities associated with water use, transportation, recreation, mineral extraction, grazing, urbanization, and other land uses. In order to make informed management decisions aimed at minimizing loss or protecting wetland acreage, quality, and function credible data on the ecological condition of these wetlands need to be collected (U.S. EPA 2002a). In order to prioritize management, protection, and restoration activities an efficient and effective method is needed to identify high-quality wetlands, monitor restoration projects, and assess the effects of management activities. It is not practical to measure every human impact to wetlands since these disturbances are numerous and complex. However, measuring the integrity of the biological community provides a means to evaluate the cumulative effect of all the stressors associated with human disturbance. The distribution of vegetation across the landscape serves as an indicator of various biotic and abiotic processes, including anthropogenic disturbance (Taft et al. 1997; U.S. EPA 2002b). Spatial and temporal human disturbances have a strong role in determining which plant species are able to survive and/or compete in a particular site. Thus, the composition of vegetation growing at a particular site integrates spatial and temporal impacts and can serve as an indicator of ecological integrity or condition. The concept of species conservatism is the foundation of the Floristic Quality Assessment (FQA) approach to monitoring and assessing ecological communities. The core of the FQA method is the use of “coefficients of conservatism” (C value), which are assigned to all native species in a flora following the methods described by Swink and Wilhelm (1994) and Wilhelm and Masters (1996). C values range from 0 to 10 and represent an estimated probability that a plant is likely to occur in a landscape relatively unaltered from pre-European settlement conditions. In other words, the species has a wide ecological tolerance and may be found almost anywhere. A C value of 10 is assigned to species which are obligate to high-quality natural areas and can’t tolerate any habitat degradation whereas a 0 is assigned to species with a wide tolerance to human disturbance. The proportion of conservative plants in a plant community provides a powerful and relatively easy assessment of the integrity of both biotic and abiotic processes and as such is indicative of the ecological integrity of a site (Wilhelm and Ladd 1988). The Floristic Quality Assessment (FQA) is a method which uses plant composition or specifically the overall conservatism of species present at a site, as an indicator of ecological condition. The FQA method, originally developed for the Chicago region, uses the proportion of conservative plants in a plant community to assess the degree of "naturalness" of an area (Swink and Wilhelm 1979, 1994). The FQA has been developed and successfully tested in 11 States and Provinces. The FQA provides a means to evaluate floristic integrity of a wetland over time, or to compare quality of wetlands of a similar type (e.g. same ecological system (Comer et al. 2003). Once each species has been assigned a C value, a few different FQA indices can be used to assess the floristic integrity of an area. These indices can be calculated using only native species as well as including non-native plants resulting in variations of three core indices: Mean C, Floristic Quality Index, and the Adjusted Floristic Quality Index. Floristic Quality Assessment Indices for Colorado Plant Communitieis The FQA provides a unique approach to ecological monitoring and assessment which moves beyond simple measures of species richness and abundance and provides an estimate of the quality of native plants at a site (Herman et al. 1997). Under the assumption that plants effectively integrate spatial and temporal human impacts to ecological systems, the FQA indices provide a cost-effective means of assessing ecological condition. The FQA indices also provide consistent, quantitative measures of floristic integrity, can be used in any plant community, do not require extensive sampling equipment (only a competent botanist), and can be applied to existing data sets. The FQA indices can be used for a variety of regulatory and non-regulatory assessment and monitoring applications. For example, FQA index scores can be used to conduct ambient monitoring of wetland condition within a targeted area, can be used to prioritize wetlands (or other ecosystems) for protection, restoration, or management efforts, and can be used to monitor the effectiveness of these actions. The FQA indices can also be used for specific wetland regulatory needs such permitting decisions associated with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Some U.S. Army Corps of Engineers districts currently use FQA indices for wetland assessment associated with permitting and mitigation activities tied to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The objecitves of this project were to assign coefficients of conservatism for each species in Colorado’s flora and then test the ability of these coefficients in detecting degradation of floristic integrity resulting from human disturbance of Southern Rocky Mountain wetlands. To accomplish these objectives, the following tasks were completed: A panel of botanical and ecological experts with field-based knowledge of Colorado’s flora was assembled (i.e. Colorado Floristic Quality Assessment Panel); The Colorado Floristic Quality Assessment Panel (Panel) convened for a one day workshop to review the process of assigning coefficients of conservatism; The Panel then individually assigned coefficients for those species which they were familiar with; The coefficient assignments were assembled for data analysis; Although coefficients were assigned to the entire Colorado flora, testing of the FQA indices only occurred for a few wetland types found in the Southern Rocky Mountain ecoregion (riparian shrublands, fens, extremely rich fens, slope wet meadows, and riverine wet meadows); Vegetation composition from wet meadows, fens, and riparian shrublands exposed to varying degrees of human disturbance were sampled; Coefficients of conservatism were plugged into multiple FQA indices and calculated for each vegetation sample plot; The FQA indices were correlated to a semi-quantitative human disturbance index to discern their effectiveness in detecting floristic change resulting from human impacts. C values were assigned by a panel of Colorado’s botanical experts. In order to provide some independent measure of the accuracy of these assignments a subset of species were also assigned C values based on their frequency of occurrence along the human disturbance gradient. An independent measure of C values was assigned to those native species which occurred in three or more of the sample plots (sensu Cohen et al. 2004 and Mushet et al. 2002). These C values were derived by averaging the Human Disturbance Index score from each plot that each of these species occurred in. This value was relativized to a value between 0-10 and used as an empirically defined C value. ii Floristic Quality Assessment Indices for Colorado Plant Communitieis A field study was conducted to determine if a subset of the assigned C values (Appendix D) were able to detect loss of floristic integrity in wetlands with increasing human perturbations. The study entailed sampling vegetation plots from wetlands exposed to varying degrees of human- induced disturbance; calculating FQA indices from each of these plots; scoring the severity, type and amount of human disturbance
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unmarked Plants Were Observed on Hike Within Boundary of De-Na-Zin Badlands Wilderness
    Plants of De-Na-Zin Badlands [San Juan Co(s), New Mexico] Observed on CONPS fieldtrip, 4/23/2007 to 4/23/2007 Leader(s): Arnold Clifford, AL Schneider; Recorder(s); Loraine Yeatts, Jan Turner, John Bregar, Travis Ward Scientific Name Synonym Common Name Agavaceae (formerly in Liliaceae) Agave 1. Yucca harrimaniae Harriman yucca Alliaceae (formerly in Liliaceae) Onion 2. Allium macropetalum San Juan onion 3. Androstephium breviflorum Wild hyacinth, funnel lily Apiaceae (Umbelliferae) Parsley 4. Cymopterus acaulis var. (C. fendleri, C. decipiens) Springparsley fendleri 5. Cymopterus bulbosus Onion spring-parsley Asteraceae (Compositae) Sunflower 6. Artemisia bigelovii Bigelow sagebrush / wormwood 7. Artemisia ludoviciana Praire sagewort 8. Chrysothamnus nauseosus ssp. Rubber rabbitbrush graveolens 9. Gutierrezia sarothrae (Xanthocephalum sarothrae) Broom snakeweed 10. Gutierrezia sarothrae (Xanthocephalum sarothrae) Broom snakeweed 11. Hymenopappus filifolius Fineleaf hymenopappus 12. Machaeranthera grindelioides Gumweed aster 13. Malacothrix sonchoides Sowthistle malacothrix 14. Packera multilobata (Senecio multilobatus) Uinta groundsel 15. Petradoria pumila (Solidago petradoria) Rock goldenrod 16. Picrothamnus desertorum (Artemisia spinescens) Budsage 17. Platyschkuhria integrifolia var. Desert bahia oblongifolia 18. Seriphidium tridentatum (Artemisia tridentata) Big sagebrush 19. Tetraneuris ivesiana (Hymenoxys acaulis var. ivesiana) Stemless woollybase 20. Townsendia annua Annual townsendia 21. Townsendia incana Silvery townsendia Boraginaceae
    [Show full text]
  • Likely to Have Habitat Within Iras That ALLOW Road
    Item 3a - Sensitive Species National Master List By Region and Species Group Not likely to have habitat within IRAs Not likely to have Federal Likely to have habitat that DO NOT ALLOW habitat within IRAs Candidate within IRAs that DO Likely to have habitat road (re)construction that ALLOW road Forest Service Species Under NOT ALLOW road within IRAs that ALLOW but could be (re)construction but Species Scientific Name Common Name Species Group Region ESA (re)construction? road (re)construction? affected? could be affected? Bufo boreas boreas Boreal Western Toad Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Plethodon vandykei idahoensis Coeur D'Alene Salamander Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Rana pipiens Northern Leopard Frog Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Accipiter gentilis Northern Goshawk Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Ammodramus bairdii Baird's Sparrow Bird 1 No No Yes No No Anthus spragueii Sprague's Pipit Bird 1 No No Yes No No Centrocercus urophasianus Sage Grouse Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Cygnus buccinator Trumpeter Swan Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Falco peregrinus anatum American Peregrine Falcon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Gavia immer Common Loon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Histrionicus histrionicus Harlequin Duck Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Lanius ludovicianus Loggerhead Shrike Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Oreortyx pictus Mountain Quail Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Otus flammeolus Flammulated Owl Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides albolarvatus White-Headed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides arcticus Black-Backed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Speotyto cunicularia Burrowing
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Wildlife Action Plan: Proposed Rare Plant Addendum
    Colorado Wildlife Action Plan: Proposed Rare Plant Addendum By Colorado Natural Heritage Program For The Colorado Rare Plant Conservation Initiative June 2011 Colorado Wildlife Action Plan: Proposed Rare Plant Addendum Colorado Rare Plant Conservation Initiative Members David Anderson, Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) Rob Billerbeck, Colorado Natural Areas Program (CNAP) Leo P. Bruederle, University of Colorado Denver (UCD) Lynn Cleveland, Colorado Federation of Garden Clubs (CFGC) Carol Dawson, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Michelle DePrenger-Levin, Denver Botanic Gardens (DBG) Brian Elliott, Environmental Consulting Mo Ewing, Colorado Open Lands (COL) Tom Grant, Colorado State University (CSU) Jill Handwerk, Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) Tim Hogan, University of Colorado Herbarium (COLO) Steve Kettler, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Andrew Kratz, U.S. Forest Service (USFS) Sarada Krishnan, Colorado Native Plant Society (CoNPS), Denver Botanic Gardens Brian Kurzel, Colorado Natural Areas Program Eric Lane, Colorado Department of Agriculture (CDA) Paige Lewis, The Nature Conservancy (TNC) Ellen Mayo, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mitchell McGlaughlin, University of Northern Colorado (UNC) Jennifer Neale, Denver Botanic Gardens Betsy Neely, The Nature Conservancy Ann Oliver, The Nature Conservancy Steve Olson, U.S. Forest Service Susan Spackman Panjabi, Colorado Natural Heritage Program Jeff Peterson, Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Josh Pollock, Center for Native Ecosystems (CNE) Nicola Ripley,
    [Show full text]
  • Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source
    Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies concolor var. concolor White fir Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica Corkbark fir Devender, T. R. (2005) Abronia villosa Hariy sand verbena McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon abutiloides Shrubby Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon berlandieri Berlandier Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon incanum Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon malacum Yellow Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon mollicomum Sonoran Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon palmeri Palmer Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon parishii Pima Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon parvulum Dwarf Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium Abutilon pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon reventum Yellow flower Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia angustissima Whiteball acacia Devender, T. R. (2005); DBGH McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia constricta Whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia greggii Catclaw acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) Acacia millefolia Santa Rita acacia McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia neovernicosa Chihuahuan whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Acalypha lindheimeri Shrubby copperleaf Herbarium Acalypha neomexicana New Mexico copperleaf McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acalypha ostryaefolia McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acalypha pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acamptopappus McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Rayless goldenhead sphaerocephalus Herbarium Acer glabrum Douglas maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer grandidentatum Sugar maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer negundo Ashleaf maple McLaughlin, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Thistles of Colorado
    Thistles of Colorado About This Guide Identification and Management Guide Many individuals, organizations and agencies from throughout the state (acknowledgements on inside back cover) contributed ideas, content, photos, plant descriptions, management information and printing support toward the completion of this guide. Mountain thistle (Cirsium scopulorum) growing above timberline Casey Cisneros, Tim D’Amato and the Larimer County Department of Natural Resources Weed District collected, compiled and edited information, content and photos for this guide. Produced by the We welcome your comments, corrections, suggestions, and high Larimer County quality photos. If you would like to contribute to future editions, please contact the Larimer County Weed District at 970-498- Weed District 5769 or email [email protected] or [email protected]. Front cover photo of Cirsium eatonii var. hesperium by Janis Huggins Partners in Land Stewardship 2nd Edition 1 2 Table of Contents Introduction 4 Introduction Native Thistles (Pages 6-20) Barneyby’s Thistle (Cirsium barnebyi) 6 Cainville Thistle (Cirsium clacareum) 6 Native thistles are dispersed broadly Eaton’s Thistle (Cirsium eatonii) 8 across many Colorado ecosystems. Individual species occupy niches from Elk or Meadow Thistle (Cirsium scariosum) 8 3,500 feet to above timberline. These Flodman’s Thistle (Cirsium flodmanii) 10 plants are valuable to pollinators, seed Fringed or Fish Lake Thistle (Cirsium 10 feeders, browsing wildlife and to the centaureae or C. clavatum var. beauty and diversity of our native plant americanum) communities. Some non-native species Mountain Thistle (Cirsium scopulorum) 12 have become an invasive threat to New Mexico Thistle (Cirsium 12 agriculture and natural areas. For this reason, native and non-native thistles neomexicanum) alike are often pulled, mowed, clipped or Ousterhout’s or Aspen Thistle (Cirsium 14 sprayed indiscriminately.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Site R058AC616MT Thin Breaks (TB) RRU 58A-C 11-14" P.Z
    Natural Resources Conservation Service Ecological site R058AC616MT Thin Breaks (TB) RRU 58A-C 11-14" p.z. Accessed: 09/24/2021 General information Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site. Associated sites R058AC049MT Silty-Steep (SiStp) RRU 58A-C 11-14" p.z. (combined R058AC046MT, R058AC047MT & R058AC048MT into this site) R058AC057MT Shallow (Sw) RRU 58A-C 11-14" p.z. R058AC058MT Very Shallow (VSw) RRU 58A-C 11-14" p.z. Table 1. Dominant plant species Tree Not specified Shrub Not specified Herbaceous Not specified Physiographic features This site is typically a complex of several ecological sites, primarily Shallow and Very Shallow. It occurs on steep to very steep slopes, usually in excess of 25 percent. Outcroppings of hard bedrock and soft sedimentary beds are major features. Slope aspect can be any direction and can be significant. Table 2. Representative physiographic features Landforms (1) Esca rpment (2) Bluff (3) Ridge Elevation 2,250–4,500 ft Slope 25% Water table depth 60 in Aspect E, S, W Climatic features Major Land Resource Area (MLRA) 58AC in Montana is considered to have a continental climate characterized by cold winters, hot summers, low humidity, light rainfall, and much sunshine. Extremes in temperature are typical. The climate is the result of this MLRA’s location in the geographic center of North America. There are few natural barriers on the northern Great Plains and the winds move freely across the plains and account for rapid changes in temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • Alplains 2013 Seed Catalog P.O
    ALPLAINS 2013 SEED CATALOG P.O. BOX 489, KIOWA, CO 80117-0489, U.S.A. Three ways to contact us: FAX: (303) 621-2864 (24 HRS.) email: [email protected] website: www.alplains.com Dear Growing Friends: Welcome to our 23rd annual seed catalog! The summer of 2012 was long, hot and brutal, with drought afflicting most of the U.S. Most of my botanical explorations were restricted to Idaho, Wash- ington, Oregon and northern California but even there moisture was below average. In a year like this, seeps, swales, springs, vestigial snowbanks and localized rainstorms became much more important in my search for seeding plants. On the Snake River Plains of southern Idaho and the scab- lands of eastern Washington, early bloomers such as Viola beckwithii, V. trinervata, Ranunculus glaberrimus, Ranunculus andersonii, Fritillaria pudica and Primula cusickiana put on quite a show in mid-April but many populations could not set seed. In northern Idaho, Erythronium idahoense flowered extensively, whole meadows were covered with thousands of the creamy, pendant blossoms. One of my most satisfying finds in the Hells Canyon area had to be Sedum valens. The tiny glaucous rosettes, surround- ed by a ring of red leaves, are a succulent connoisseur’s dream. Higher up, the brilliant blue spikes of Synthyris missurica punctuated the canyon walls. In southern Oregon, the brilliant red spikes of Pedicularis densiflora lit up the Siskiyou forest floor. Further north in Oregon, large populations of Erythronium elegans, Erythronium oregonum ssp. leucandrum, Erythro- nium revolutum, trilliums and sedums provided wonderful picture-taking opportunities. Eriogonum species did well despite the drought, many of them true xerics.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Exotic Species List
    Exotic Species in Illinois Descriptions for these exotic species in Illinois will be added to the Web page as time allows for their development. A name followed by an asterisk (*) indicates that a description for that species can currently be found on the Web site. This list does not currently name all of the exotic species in the state, but it does show many of them. It will be updated regularly with additional information. Microbes viral hemorrhagic septicemia Novirhabdovirus sp. West Nile virus Flavivirus sp. Zika virus Flavivirus sp. Fungi oak wilt Ceratocystis fagacearum chestnut blight Cryphonectria parasitica Dutch elm disease Ophiostoma novo-ulmi and Ophiostoma ulmi late blight Phytophthora infestans white-nose syndrome Pseudogymnoascus destructans butternut canker Sirococcus clavigignenti-juglandacearum Plants okra Abelmoschus esculentus velvet-leaf Abutilon theophrastii Amur maple* Acer ginnala Norway maple Acer platanoides sycamore maple Acer pseudoplatanus common yarrow* Achillea millefolium Japanese chaff flower Achyranthes japonica Russian knapweed Acroptilon repens climbing fumitory Adlumia fungosa jointed goat grass Aegilops cylindrica goutweed Aegopodium podagraria horse chestnut Aesculus hippocastanum fool’s parsley Aethusa cynapium crested wheat grass Agropyron cristatum wheat grass Agropyron desertorum corn cockle Agrostemma githago Rhode Island bent grass Agrostis capillaris tree-of-heaven* Ailanthus altissima slender hairgrass Aira caryophyllaea Geneva bugleweed Ajuga genevensis carpet bugleweed* Ajuga reptans mimosa
    [Show full text]
  • Species Relationships and Farina Evolution in the Cheilanthoid Fern
    Systematic Botany (2011), 36(3): pp. 554–564 © Copyright 2011 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists DOI 10.1600/036364411X583547 Species Relationships and Farina Evolution in the Cheilanthoid Fern Genus Argyrochosma (Pteridaceae) Erin M. Sigel , 1 , 3 Michael D. Windham , 1 Layne Huiet , 1 George Yatskievych , 2 and Kathleen M. Pryer 1 1 Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 U. S. A. 2 Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166 U. S. A. 3 Author for correspondence ( [email protected] ) Communicating Editor: Lynn Bohs Abstract— Convergent evolution driven by adaptation to arid habitats has made it difficult to identify monophyletic taxa in the cheilanthoid ferns. Dependence on distinctive, but potentially homoplastic characters, to define major clades has resulted in a taxonomic conundrum: all of the largest cheilanthoid genera have been shown to be polyphyletic. Here we reconstruct the first comprehensive phylogeny of the strictly New World cheilanthoid genus Argyrochosma . We use our reconstruction to examine the evolution of farina (powdery leaf deposits), which has played a prominent role in the circumscription of cheilanthoid genera. Our data indicate that Argyrochosma comprises two major monophyletic groups: one exclusively non-farinose and the other primarily farinose. Within the latter group, there has been at least one evolutionary reversal (loss) of farina and the development of major chemical variants that characterize specific clades. Our phylogenetic hypothesis, in combination with spore data and chromosome counts, also provides a critical context for addressing the prevalence of polyploidy and apomixis within the genus. Evidence from these datasets provides testable hypotheses regarding reticulate evolution and suggests the presence of several previ- ously undetected taxa of Argyrochosma.
    [Show full text]
  • COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Tiny Cryptantha Cryptantha Minima in Canada
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Tiny Cryptantha Cryptantha minima in Canada THREATENED 2012 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2012. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Tiny Cryptantha Cryptantha minima in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. x + 37 pp. (www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default_e.cfm). Previous report(s): COSEWIC. 2000. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the tiny cryptanthe Cryptantha minima in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 18 pp. Smith, B. 1998. COSEWIC status report on the tiny cryptanthe Cryptantha minima in Canada, in COSEWIC assessment and status report on the tiny cryptanthe Cryptantha minima in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-18 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Sue Michalsky for writing the status report on the Tiny Cryptantha Cryptantha minima in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Bruce Bennett and Erich Haber, Co-chairs of the COSEWIC Vascular Plants Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la Cryptanthe minuscule (Cryptantha minima) au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Tiny Cryptantha — Source: Environment Canada 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Milk Thistle
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control BIOLOGY AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF EXOTIC T RU E T HISTL E S RACHEL WINSTON , RICH HANSEN , MA R K SCH W A R ZLÄNDE R , ER IC COO M BS , CA R OL BELL RANDALL , AND RODNEY LY M FHTET-2007-05 U.S. Department Forest September 2008 of Agriculture Service FHTET he Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) was created in 1995 Tby the Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry, USDA, Forest Service, to develop and deliver technologies to protect and improve the health of American forests. This book was published by FHTET as part of the technology transfer series. http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/technology/ On the cover: Italian thistle. Photo: ©Saint Mary’s College of California. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for information only and does not constitute an endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]