Study of the Anomalous Thermochemical Behavior of 1,2-Diazines by Correlation-Gas Chromatography
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
1628 J. Chem. Eng. Data 2010, 55, 1628–1635 Study of the Anomalous Thermochemical Behavior of 1,2-Diazines by Correlation-Gas Chromatography Dmitry Lipkind and James S. Chickos* Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of MissourisSt. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63121 Joel F. Liebman Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland 21250 The vaporization enthalpies and liquid vapor pressures of quinoxaline, quinazoline, phthalazine, benzo[c]cinnoline, 1,10-phenanthroline, phenazine, and triphenylamine are measured by correlation-gas chromatography and compared to values calculated from available literature vaporization, sublimation, and fusion enthalpy data. Good agreement with the literature is observed for all compounds except the 1,2-diazines and the sublimation enthalpy of triphenylamine. The results suggest that liquid 1,2-diazines exhibit an additional intermolecular stabilizing interaction of approximately 6 kJ · mol-1 not present in other diazine isomers. Introduction tion enthalpies and liquid vapor pressures. The standards are injected simultaneously with the target substances. Since each Derivatives of pyrazine, pyrimidine, and pyridazine comprise analyte moves on the column according to its vapor pressure a set of diverse compounds, many of which are found in natural on the column, measurement of the temperature dependence of products and biological systems. Recently we examined the its retention time provides a convenient measure of both its - vaporization enthalpies of the parent compounds by correlation volatility and interaction with the column. Since the vapor gas chromatography and observed that compounds that served pressure of each analyte is inversely proportional to its retention as suitable standards for pyrazines, pyrimidines, and 1,3,5- time, a plot of ln(ta/to)vs1/T, usually over a T ) 30 K range, triazines were unsuitable for use with pyridazines. Upon closer results in a linear relationship with a slope equal to the enthalpy examination of their vaporization enthalpies, it was observed of transfer of the analyte from the column to the gas phase, that intermolecular interactions occurring in pyridazines are g ∆sln Hm(T), divided by the gas constant. The term to refers to a considerably stronger than those in the corresponding pyrim- reference time, 1 min, and ta is the time each analyte spends on idines and pyrazines. The origin of this enhanced intermolecular the column. It is evaluated as the difference between the 1,2 interaction was attributed to the presence of a 1,2-diazine. measured retention time of each analyte and that of a nonretained This article reports the results of a study aimed at: (1) reference. The enthalpy of transfer can be related to the determining whether this enhanced intermolecular interaction following thermodynamic relationship is characteristic of all aromatic 1,2-diazines and (2) evaluating g ) g + g the magnitude of this interaction. The compounds evaluated in ∆sln Hm(Tm) ∆1 Hm(Tm) ∆sln Hm(Tm) (1) g this study include quinoxaline, quinazoline, phthalazine, ben- where ∆l Hm(Tm) refers to the vaporization enthalpy and zo[c]cinnoline, phenazine, and 1,10-phenanthroline. The struc- ∆slnHm(Tm) refers to the interaction of each analyte with the ture of the compounds studied and those used as standards are column measured at some mean temperature, Tm. The enthalpy g illustrated in Figure 1. In the process of identifying additional of transfer, ∆sln Hm(Tm), has been found to correlate linearly g 3 standards that could be useful in correlation gas chromatography with ∆l Hm(T). Temperature T usually differs from Tm. The experiments, the vaporization enthalpy of triphenylamine was quality of the correlation obtained is determined by both also investigated. The sublimation,5 vaporization,6 and fusion7 the quality of data available for the standards and selection of enthalpies of triphenylamine have previously been reported. Our the appropriate standards. initial inclination was to use triphenylamine as one of the The appropriateness of the standards used for the compounds standards in this study, but upon closer inspection, one (or more) studied in this work with the exception of the aromatic 1,2- of these reported measurements appeared to be thermodynami- diazines has previously been demonstrated.1,4 The difference cally incompatible with the others. Correlation-gas chroma- betweenthevaporizationenthalpyvaluemeasuredbycorrelation-gas tography experiments were performed to identify the discordant chromatography and that obtained by other methods was chosen property. as a means of identifying and quantifying the magnitude of this Correlation-gas chromatography is a simple and reliable additional stabilizing interaction found in the liquid phase of method for evaluating vaporization enthalpy and vapor pressure aromatic 1,2-diazines. Pyridazine is the only liquid aromatic 8 regardless of whether the target substance is a solid or liquid.3,4 1,2-diazine whose vaporization enthalpy has been measured. The method requires the use of standards with reliable vaporiza- However, the sublimation and fusion enthalpy of several crystalline aromatic heterocyclic 1,2-diazines have been mea- * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]. sured. A summary of these results is reported in Table 1. 10.1021/je900702t 2010 American Chemical Society Published on Web 12/17/2009 Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, Vol. 55, No. 4, 2010 1629 Figure 1. Compounds evaluated in this study. From left to right, top to bottom: quinoxaline, quinazoline phthalazine, benzo[c]cinnoline, phenazine, 1,10- phenanthroline, and triphenylamine. Standards: 2,6-dimethylquinoline, 2-phenylpyridine, 4,7-phenanthroline, 7,8-benzoquinoline, acridine, and tributylamine. Table 1. Summary of the (A) Sublimation, Vaporization, and Fusion Enthalpies Available in the Literature and (B) the Vaporization Enthalpy of Triphenylamine and Their Adjustment to T ) 298.15 K g g l l g ∆cr Hm(Tm) Tm ∆cr Hm(298 K) ∆cr Hm(Tfus) Tfus Cp(l)/Cp(cr) ∆cr Hm(298 K) ∆l Hm(298 K) (A) (kJ · mol-1) K (kJ · mol-1) (kJ · mol-1)K(J· mol-1 · K) (kJ · mol-1) (kJ · mol-1) phthalazine 81.1 ( 0.4a 13.3 ( 0.6a 364.5 202.8/149.8 10.7 ( 1.1 70.4 ( 1.2 82.3 ( 2.3b 10.7 ( 1.1 71.6 ( 2.5 96.7c na 96.7 10.7 ( 1.1 86.0 quinoxaline 69.4 ( 0.6a 11.8 ( 0.1a 305.7 202.8/149.8 11.5 ( 0.1 57.9 ( 2.0 66.6 ( 2.0b 11.5 ( 0.1 55.1 ( 2.0 quinazoline 77.6 ( 0.5a 17.0 ( 0.2a 320.9 202.8/149.8 16.0 ( 0.4 61.6 ( 0.6 76.6 ( 1.4b 16.0 ( 0.4 60.6 ( 1.5 phenazine 92.7 ( 0.4d 354 95.1 ( 0.8 20.9 ( 0.7g 447.9 277/201.7 13.2 ( 2.6 81.9 ( 2.7 18.9 ( 0.1d 447.9 11.2 ( 2.6 83.9 ( 2.7 91.8 ( 2.1e 298 91.8 ( 2.1 20.9 ( 0.7g 447.9 13.2 ( 2.6 78.6 ( 3.4 18.9 ( 0.1d 447.9 11.2 ( 2.6 80.6 ( 3.4 90.4 ( 2.5f 298 90.4 ( 2.5 20.9 ( 0.7g 447.9 13.2 ( 2.6 77.2 ( 3.6 18.9 ( 0.1d 447.9 11.2 ( 2.6 79.2 ( 3.6 90.4 ( 1.7g 302 90.4 ( 1.7 20.9 ( 0.7g 447.9 13.2 ( 2.6 77.4 ( 3.1 18.9 ( 0.1d 447.9 11.2 ( 2.6 79.2 ( 3.1 benzo[c]cinnoline 101.7 ( 0.2h 340 103.5 ( 0.6 20.9 ( 0.1h 430 277/201.7 14.1 ( 2.2 89.2 ( 2.3 113.0c na 14.1 ( 2.2 98.9 1,10-phenanthroline 98.3c na 11.8 ( 0.1i 391.1 277/201.7 7.0 ( 1.6 91.3 4,7-phenanthroline 80.8 ( 4.8m triphenylamine 87.9 ( 1.3j 348 90.9 ( 1.6 24.9 ( 0.4k 400.2 394.9/319.5 18.3 ( 2.2 73.7 ( 2.7 g g l l g ∆l Hm(Tm) Tm ∆l Hm(298 K) ∆cr Hm(Tfus) Tfus Cp(l)/Cp(cr) ∆cr Hm(298 K) ∆cr Hm(298 K) (B) (kJ · mol-1) K (kJ · mol-1) (kJ · mol-1)K(J· mol-1 · K) (kJ · mol-1) (kJ · mol-1) triphenylamine 67.4l 523 92.8 ( 6 24.9 ( 0.4k 400.2 394.9/319.5 18.3 ( 2.2 111.1 ( 3.6 a Ref 9. b Ref 10. c Ref 11. na in column three: not available. d Ref 12. e Ref 13. f Ref 14. g Ref 15. h Ref 16. i Ref 17. j Ref 5. k Ref 7. l Ref 6. m Ref 4. The second column of Table 1 lists literature sublimation Fusion enthalpies and fusion temperatures are reported in enthalpies evaluated at the mean temperature of measurement. columns 5 and 6. Adjustments of the enthalpies reported in 1630 Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, Vol. 55, No. 4, 2010 Table 2. Parameters of (A) the Cox Equation Used for Reference, (B) the Wagner Equation, and (C) the Third-Order Polynomial 7 (A) A1 A2*10 Tb range -1 -2 Cox equation Ao T T KK acridine20 2.89594 -0.00111538 6.486 618.059 383 to 637 7,8-benzoquinoline20 2.88454 -0.00111802 6.6824 14.49 373 to 672 (B) Tc pc range a Wagner equation AW BW CW DW K kPa K 2,6-dimethylquinoline21 -8.993312 3.594873 -4.63173 -2.907492 786 3480 337 to 592 ABC range (C) K3 K2 K D K 4 tri-n-butylamine 30767110 -712464.53 -3836.0 10.769 298 to Tb 4 2-phenylpyridine 82334650 -1199538.89 -2988.7 8.899 298 to Tb 4 4,7-phenanthroline 123705710 -1579329.77 -3296.6 8.741 298 to Tb a Tr ) T/Tc.