DOCSLIB.ORG

Biomass and Chemotherapeutant

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biomass and Chemotherapeutant BIOMASS AND CHEMOTHERAPEUTANT TECHNICAL MODELLING REPORT CAR/ L/ 1016128 COPISTER Author: Vicki Smith Report date: 11 October 2017 Cooke Aquaculture Scotland Crowness Rd, Hatston Industrial Estate, Kirkwall, Orkney, KW15 1RG T: +44 (0)1856 876101 www.cookeaqua .com Copister Technical Modelling Report October 11, 2017 Table of Contents 1. Summary ........................................................................................................ 2 2. Introduction ................................................................................................... 3 3. Input data ...................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Site data .................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Hydrographic data .................................................................................... 5 3.3 Bathymetric data ...................................................................................... 6 3.4 Bath modelling .......................................................................................... 7 4. Results ........................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Biomass ..................................................................................................... 8 4.1.1 Transects and sampling stations ......................................................... 9 4.1.2 Fate Assessment of Exported Material ..............................................12 4.2 In-feed treatments .................................................................................. 15 4.2.1 Slice – Emamectin Benzoate ............................................................. 15 4.3 Bath treatments ...................................................................................... 20 4.3.1 Salmosan Vet – Azamethiphos .......................................................... 20 4.3.2 Excis - Cypermethrin ......................................................................... 21 4.3.3 Alphamax - Deltamethrin .................................................................. 21 4.3.4 Alternative bath models .................................................................... 21 5. Discussion .................................................................................................... 22 6. References ................................................................................................... 24 7. Appendices .................................................................................................. 25 7.1 Appendix 1 - Changeover to Salmosan Vet.............................................. 25 Cooke Aquaculture Scotland Page 1 | 26 Copister Technical Modelling Report October 11, 2017 1. Summary Cooke Aquaculture Scotland Ltd . (CAS) has undertaken biomass and chemotherapeutant modelling work for the marine cage fish farm site, Copister. The site is located in Hamna Voe situated off the south coast of the island of Yell, Shetland. The proposed new set up at the Copister site is 16x120m circular cages, split into two 4x2 cage groups with a separation distance of 60m. The site was modelled to determine the maximum biomass and the recommended consent limits of in-feed treatments and bath treatments in regards to the new infrastructure being proposed. Site specific benthic monitoring transects were defined with a primary sampling transect originating from the south west cage on the southern cage group on a bearing of 134°G. The recommended consent limits achieved are detailed in Table 1. Table 1 Summary of the Recommended Consent Limits for the Copister site. Maximum Biomass 2,486.5t Stocking density 11.3kg/ m3 In-Feed Treatments Emamectin Benzoate TAQ MTQ Mass (g) 4,351.4 870.3 Equivalent Treatable 12,432.5 2,486.5 Biomass ( t) Bath treatments Azamethiphos Cypermethrin Deltamethrin 3hr 24hr 3hr 3hr Mass (g) 279.1 214.3 50.52 18.95 Equivalent Treatable 2,791 2,143 10,104 9,473 Volume (m3) Cooke Aquaculture Scotland Page 2 | 26 Copister Technical Modelling Report October 11, 2017 2. Introduction The proposed changes to the Copister site include an increase in cage number and cage size from 10x100m circumference cages to 16x120m circumference cages. The cages will be split into two groups of eight cages arranged in 4x2 grid configurations with a 60m separation distance between the groups. The cages groups run parallel to the eastern coastline of Hamna Voe, orientated to 320°. The cages will be housed in 60m square grids with a net depth of 12m. The site centre located between the two cage groups is 60°29.422’N 01°05.071’W (HU 50407 78868). Figure 1 illustrates the location of the Copister site. The proposed new set up at the Copister fish farm has been modelled to determine the maximum permissible biomass at the site and to produce a monitoring protocol recommendation for submission to SEPA. In addition , the quantities of the in-feed treatment Slice and the bath treatments Salmosan Vet, Excis and Alphamax are to be determined ensuring they are compliant with the required standards set by SEPA under The Water Environment ( Controlled Activities) ( Scotland) Regulations 2011 (CAR). Figure 1 Site location Cooke Aquaculture Scotland Page 3 | 26 Copister Technical Modelling Report October 11, 2017 3. Input data 3.1 Site data AutoDepomod version 2.0.52 is used to simulate the release and deposition of waste feed and faecal material on the seabed from which the benthic impact is predicted. For in-feed treatments the area and concentration of chem ical deposition are derived via simulation of the chemical load associated with this material. Residual discharge concentrations are calculated using aqueous discharge models for bath treatments (BathAuto version 5.1). The distance to shore parameter is taken as the distance from the site centre located between the two cage groups to the nearest shoreline on Yell to the east. The average water depth is determined from the AutoDepomod bathymetry grid file utilising the Surfer volume calculations. Background information on the techniques employed are detailed in a separate methods report ‘Biomass and Chemotherapeutant Modelling Methods Report’ which can be found on the USB flash drive. Site specific data for the Copister site required by AutoDepomod are presented in Table 2. Table 2 Site Input Data Site name Copister Consent Number CAR/ L/ 1016128 Company Cooke Aquaculture Scotland Receiving water Hamna Voe Site NGR 450407 1178868 Current meter NGR 450342 1178985 Distance to shore (km) 0.488 Average water depth (m) 22.71 Number of cages 16 Shape of cages Circular Circumference of cages (m) 120 (Radius – 19.1m) Cage group configuration 2 groups-4x2 Grid size (m2) 60 Cage group orientation (°Grid) 320 Working net depth (m) 12 Treatment net depth (m) 2.43 Cooke Aquaculture Scotland Page 4 | 26 Copister Technical Modelling Report October 11, 2017 3.2 Hydrographic data A hydrographic survey at the Copister site was carried out in November and December 2010. The data and report was accepted by SEPA as being suitable for modelling purposes. A 15 day subset of data was selected running from 17th November to 2nd December 2010 using data from three specified depths that represented near surface, cage bottom and near seabed layers. Direction data are supplied pre-corrected to Grid North. Intermediate spring and neap tides were identified from tidal heights for Burra Voe. Raw current velocity data was formatted for use in AutoDepomod using the SEPA template ‘ temp-20min-HGv3.xls’ files created ‘Copister-HG.xls’, ‘ Copister-NS-b.dat’, ‘Copister-NS-m.dat’, ‘Copister-NS-s.dat’). The hydrographic input data is shown in Table 3 below: Table 3 Hydrographic Data Input Depth of current meter (m) 24.6 Height of surface cell from the seabed (m) 20 Height of middle cell from the seabed ( m) 16.6 Height of bottom cell from the seabed (m) 3 Date Spring Tide commence 18/ 11/ 2010 06:40 Data record number) 25) Date Neap Tide commence 25/ 11/ 2010 06:40 Data record number) 193) Current Speed unit cm/ s Mean Sea Level (m)* 1.35 Compass variation 0.0W Source:* Admiralty TotalTide Version 17,0,0,5 - Nearest port: Burra Voe Cooke Aquaculture Scotland Page 5 | 26 Copister Technical Modelling Report October 11, 2017 3.3 Bathymetric data Bathymetry data was derived by digitising contours and spot depths from an Admiralty Chart. The data was re-contoured using Surfer 8. Data was limited to a 1km² model domain with the grid limits: Minimum – 449840 1178340 Maximum – 450840 1179340 Bathymetric data files were created; ‘Copister.csv’, ‘ Copister.bln’ and ‘Copister.ini’. Figure 2 below shows the bathymetry of the 1km2 model grid and the location of the Copister cage groups. 1179200 1179000 1178800 1178600 1178400 450000 450200 450400 450600 450800 Eastings Admiralty charts: Copyright: © Crown Copyright/ SeaZone Solutions. All Rights Reserved. Licence No. 052006. 001 (2017). NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION. Figure 2 Bathymetry of the model grid illustrating the location of the cage groups. Cooke Aquaculture Scotland Page 6 | 26 Copister Technical Modelling Report October 11, 2017 3.4 Bath modelling For the long term bath treatment model the “ strait” scenario was considered as the most appropriate to the site location. For the input parameters, the strait which was outlined as the south section of Yell Sound was defined by the following boundaries; at the north mouth between Mio Ness, mainland Shetland (HU 42670 79283) and Clothan, Yell (HU 45573
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Theses Digitisation: This Is a Digitised
    https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ Theses Digitisation: https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/research/enlighten/theses/digitisation/ This is a digitised version of the original print thesis. Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] VOLUME 3 ( d a t a ) ter A R t m m w m m d geq&haphy 2 1 SHETLAND BROCKS Thesis presented in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor 6f Philosophy in the Facility of Arts, University of Glasgow, 1979 ProQuest Number: 10984311 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10984311 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • 30 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    30 bus time schedule & line map 30 Ulsta - West Sandwick View In Website Mode The 30 bus line (Ulsta - West Sandwick) has 3 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Mid Yell: 3:50 PM (2) Ulsta: 6:30 AM - 4:55 PM (3) West Sandwick: 9:40 AM - 6:20 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 30 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 30 bus arriving. Direction: Mid Yell 30 bus Time Schedule 14 stops Mid Yell Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 3:50 PM Ferry Terminal, Ulsta Tuesday 3:50 PM Copister Rd End, Ulsta Wednesday 3:50 PM Road End, Hamnavoe Thursday 3:50 PM Road End, Houlland Friday 3:50 PM Public Hall, Burravoe Saturday 3:20 PM School, Burravoe Road End, Gossabrough 30 bus Info Road End, Otterswick Direction: Mid Yell Stops: 14 Trip Duration: 35 min Queyon Rd End, Otterswick Line Summary: Ferry Terminal, Ulsta, Copister Rd End, Ulsta, Road End, Hamnavoe, Road End, South Rd End, Aywick Houlland, Public Hall, Burravoe, School, Burravoe, Road End, Gossabrough, Road End, Otterswick, North Rd End, Aywick Queyon Rd End, Otterswick, South Rd End, Aywick, North Rd End, Aywick, Vatsetter Rd End, Mid Yell, Vatsetter Rd End, Mid Yell Whiteƒeld Cottage, Mid Yell, School, Mid Yell Whiteƒeld Cottage, Mid Yell School, Mid Yell Direction: Ulsta 30 bus Time Schedule 20 stops Ulsta Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 6:30 AM - 4:55 PM Village, West Sandwick Tuesday 6:30 AM - 4:55 PM Hjarkland Rd End, West Sandwick Wednesday 6:30 AM - 4:55 PM Grimister Rd End, Mid
    [Show full text]
  • FSS Scotland Classification Report (01 Apr 2021 to 31 March 2022) PLEASE NOTE: All Sites Located Within a Production Area and Ha
    FSS Scotland classification report (01 Apr 2021 to 31 March 2022) Local Authority AB (Argyll and Bute Council) Production Area Map No Species Classification Boundaries Comments Sanitary Survey Site Name Micro RMP 2021= B : April & November to December Change in Ardencaple Common C : May to October Inland of points NM 7701 1940 Classification - Cockles Ardencaple cockles 2022= B : January to March and NM 7721 1933 Unfavourable (blank) (AB-818-2146-04) NM77071930 Area within lines drawn between NR 7522 2031 and NR 7451 2009 and between 2021= B : April & December NR 7455 1959 and between Change in Campbeltown Common C : May to November NR 7530 1953 and NR 7558 Classification - Kildalloig Bay Loch 68 cockles 2022= B : January to March 1990 extending to MHWS. Favourable Complete (AB-029-008-04) NR74761999 Area bounded by lines drawn between NM9037 4549 to NM 2021= A : April & November to 9000 4600 NM 9100 4680 to December NM 9140 4730 to NM 9230 Common B : May to October 4730 to NM 9220 4650 Port Appin Castle Stalker Pending cockles 2022= A : January to March extending to MHWS Classification remainsComplete the same (AB-492-909-04) NM91904710 Area bounded by lines drawn between NR 3483 8949 and NR 3483 9015 and between NR 3720 9015 and NR 3751 2021 = A : April - December 8981 and between NR 3759 The Strand East Colonsay Pacific oysters 2022 = A : January - March 8962 extending to MHWS Classification remainsComplete the same (AB-041-1199-13) The Strand West (AB-041-009-13) NR35858971 Area bounded by lines drawn 2021= B : April & October to December between NM 8837 3452, NM Change in Dunstaffnage Common C : May to September 9022 3450, NM 9022 3414 Classification - Dunstaffnage Bay Cockles cockles 2022= B : January to March extending to MHWS Unfavourable Complete (AB-696-1511-04) NM88133382 Area bounded by lines drawn 2021= A : April & Nov to Dec between NR 6574 5260 and Classification East Tarbert B : May to October NR 6583 5210 extending to remains the Isle of Gigha Bay 02/02/2012 Pacific oysters 2022= A : January to March MHWS.
    [Show full text]
  • European Storm-Petrels
    July 2011 THE DATA AND MAPS PRESENTED IN THESE PAGES WAS INITIALLY PUBLISHED IN SEABIRD POPULATIONS OF BRITAIN AND IRELAND: RESULTS OF THE SEABIRD 2000 CENSUS (1998-2002). The full citation for the above publication is:- P. Ian Mitchell, Stephen F. Newton, Norman Ratcliffe and Timothy E. Dunn (Eds.). 2004. Seabird Populations of Britain and Ireland: results of the Seabird 2000 census (1998-2002). Published by T and A.D. Poyser, London. More information on the seabirds of Britain and Ireland can be accessed via http://www.jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-1530. To find out more about JNCC visit http://www.jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-1729. Table 1 Response rates to tape playback of purr calls by European Storm-petrels. Administrative area or country Response rate (95% CLs) Source Yell Islands (Linga, Bigga, Samphrey, Copister, 0.43 (0.34–0.52) Fowler (2001) Brother), Shetland Mousa, Shetland 0.25 (0.23–0.27) Ratcliffe et al. (1998e) Auskerry, Orkney Grassland (rabbit burrows) 0.53 (0.39–0.66) Mitchell & Williams (unpubl.) Boulder beach 0.59 (0.41–0.77) Mitchell & Williams (unpubl.) Stone ruins 0.56 (0.36–0.76) Mitchell & Williams (unpubl.) North Rona, Western Isles 0.40 (0.36–0.44) Murray et al. (in prep.) Hirta, St Kilda, Western Isles 0.43 (0.21–0.58) Mitchell et al. (2003) Treshnish Isles, Argyll & Bute 0.37 (0.23–0.51) Ratcliffe et al. (1998e) Priest Island, west coast Ross & Cromarty Boulder beach 0.47 (0.40–0.54) Mayhew et al. (2000) Stone Wall 0.42 (0.38–0.45) Mayhew et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Fast-Tracking Disease-Ridden Scottish Salmon
    Scottish Salmon Watch, 28 May 2018 Hard Evidence: Fast-Tracking Disease-Ridden Scottish Salmon - Data reveals a shortening of production cycle from 20 to 16 months in last decade - Deaths due to disease 'masked' via early harvest claim Scottish Parliament - 'Masked' is an inappropriate word argues Marine Harvest - "The increased ability to grow larger smolts provides the opportunity to reduce the marine grow out phase of farmed salmon, thus reducing the time spent in sea and the length of exposure to marine challenges such as sea lice," claims 'Scotland’s 10 Year Farmed Fish Health Framework' A data analysis by Scottish Salmon Watch (see Appendix 1) backs up a claim by the Scottish Parliament's Environment, Climate Change and Land Reform Committee in March that salmon farmers in Scotland are harvesting early due to lice, disease and mortality problems. Data accessed via Scotland's Aquaculture web-site reveals that the average production cycle for Scottish salmon farms is currently 16.5 months (sourced from 2013-2017 data - sadly monthly biomass data is only available up to December 2017). This compares to 20.1 months a decade ago (sourced from 2002-2007 data - monthly biomass data is only available from 2002). Whilst operators in the period 2002 to 2007 all reported production cycles around 20 months (the shortest was Grieg Seafood at 19.4 months and the longest was Marine Harvest at 20.5 months) there was significant fluctuations for the current period (2013-2017). Loch Duart and Cooke Aquaculture reported the shortest production cycle at 13.2 months and 13.5 months respectively with Marine Harvest reporting 16.2 months; both Scottish Sea Farms and The Scottish Salmon Company reporting 18 months and Grieg Seafood the longest at 19.1 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Paper to Local Landscape Areas Supplementary
    Shetland Local Landscape Designation Review: Final Report Prepared for Shetland Islands Council by Land Use Consultants October 2011 www.landuse.co.uk LUC SERVICES Environmental Planning Landscape Design Landscape Management Masterplanning Landscape Planning Ecology Environmental Assessment Rural Futures Digital Design Urban Regeneration Urban Design 43 Chalton Street 37 Otago Street London NW1 1JD Glasgow G12 8JJ Tel: 020 7383 5784 Tel: 0141 334 9595 Fax: 020 7383 4798 Fax: 0141 334 7789 [email protected] [email protected] 14 Great George Street 28 Stafford Street Bristol BS1 5RH Edinburgh EH3 7BD Tel: 0117 929 1997 Tel: 0131 202 1616 Fax: 0117 929 1998 [email protected] [email protected] DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Version Status: Version Details: Prepared Checked Approved by: by: by: Ver: Date: Principal 1 7/10/2011 Draft Final Report PDM SCO NJ 2 31/10/2011 Final Report PDM NJ NJ CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2 INTRODUCTION 3 Study Context ........................................................................................................ 3 Scottish Planning Policy ......................................................................................................... 3 Shetland Policy Context ........................................................................................................ 4 Guidance on Local Landscape Designations ............................................................................ 4 Local Landscape Areas .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Minutes of Meeting of Yell Community Council
    Minutes of Meeting of Yell Community Council (to be approved at the next meeting) Monday 28th January 2019 at 7.00pm in the Mid Yell School Present: Mr L Odie (Chairman), Mrs A Jamieson (Vice-Chair) & Mr J Nicholson In Attendance: Mrs J Lyth (Clerk) & Ms F Browne (NI Development Worker) Apologies: Mr R Jamieson & Mr S Henderson. Visitors: There were no visitors 01/19/3 MINUTES 10 December 2018 – the minutes from the December meeting were approved by Mrs A Jamieson & Mr L Odie. 14 January 2019 – the notes from the ferries meeting are to be reviewed and held until February meeting. 16 January 2019 – the notes from the Health & Social Care meeting are to be reviewed and held until the February meeting. Action: clerk forward to CC Liaison, Police and post on website 01/19/4 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Mr J Nicholson declared an interest in the proposed Energy Isles wind farm in North Yell. Ms Browne to find out more information on declarations of interest for clarification. To research the level of interest which should be declared and feed back to members after the cc elections. Clerk checked with CC liaison about putting all memberships of interests of current cc members on the web page. Although this is not a requirement, members think this is good practice and shows transparency. Clerk to gather information from cc members. 01/19/5 COMMUNITY WORK Hamnavoe Kirk – members of the kirk have met with Ms Browne to discuss the possibility of buying the kirk which is on the list of Church of Scotland proposed closures.
    [Show full text]
  • SOME OBSERVATIONS on the BROCHS. by A. GRAHAM, MA, FSASCOT., FSA Read May 12, 1947. SUMMARY of CONTENTS
    48 PROCEEDING E SOCIETYTH F O S , 1946-48. V. SOME OBSERVATION E BROCHS . TH GRAHAMA N Y O SB . , M.A., F.S.A.SCOT., F.S.A. Read May 12, 1947. SUMMARY OF CONTENTS. PAGE . INTRODUCTOR1 Y .........8 4 . NUMBER2 DISTRIBUTIOD AN S BROCHF NO S ....9 4 . ARCHITECTURA3 L FEATURES: (i) Entrances .... ..... 54 (ii) Guard-cells ......... 56 (iii) Mural CellBasad san l Galleries ....7 5 . (iv) Upper Galleries and Stairs ...... 62 (v) Scarcements . .67 (vi) Voids .......... 71 (vii) Roofing and Wall-heads . .71 (viii) Wells and Tanks ........ 76 (ix) Hearths ..........7 7 . 4. SHAPE AND DIMENSIONS: (i) Ground Plan ........7 7 . (ii) Diameter .......... 78 (iii) Height .........0 8 . EXTERNA5 L DEFENCES ........7 8 . RECAPITULATIO6 N .........0 9 . APPENDIX (List of Brochs, etc.) ........ 91 1. INTRODUCTORY. The main features of the typical broch are very well known, and general informatio e subject difficulth no n s o i ncomo tt t e by.1 Further detailed descriptions of individual brochs are to be found here and there 1 E.g. Anderson, Scotland Pagann i Times: the Iron ff.4 ; 17 Age, Antiquity,. pp ff. 0 , 29 . volpp . i . K.O.A.M., Inventory of Orkney Shetland,d an . ff.1 Nosii 3 ; . vols. pp 263 . i . , 553; iii. Nos. 1149, 1206, 1246. SOME OBSERVATIONS ON THE BROCKS. 49 literature,e iinferencee nth th d an s regarding their origi datd nan e that ca mose drawe lighe nth b th f to tn n receni 1 t evidence have been discussed Professoy b leavre s soow Childe.e reala s eth t na f generalitie mo Bu 2 s we encounte considerabla r e bod factf yo s whic muce har h less familiao t r antiquaries thesed an , , thoug t leah no importano dt they y ma con w -ne t clusions, are yet relevant to any attempt to fill in the outline sketch and same th et a time posses a certais n intrinsic interest purpose e Th th .
    [Show full text]
  • Shetland Food and Drink Guide 2020 Shetland Food and Drink
    SHETLAND FOOD AND DRINK GUIDE 2020 SHETLAND FOOD AND DRINK Welcome to the Shetland Food felt more exciting and we want and Drink Guide 2020! This is you to be part of that story. the first publication of its kind brought to you by Shetland Our centrefold map puts Food and Drink, a membership Shetland’s food and drink Welcome company promoting Shetland’s specialists in context, locating exceptional produce. them in restaurants, shops and farms from Unst to Sumburgh. These pages trace Shetland’s Perhaps you’ll want to fully current food landscape explore the provenance of and will guide your journey Shetland’s world-famous of culinary discovery, from fare, or maybe you’ll enjoy coastline teeming with fish hand-picking your favourite to the heathery home of foods from quality retailers Shetland lamb. We're sharing throughout the isles. Either business information here way, we hope this guide as an invitation to visit, will be a valuable source of taste and interact. Since our information and inspiration. organisation formed in 2017 full and associate members Explore, taste and savour of Shetland Food and Drink Shetland! have been working together to celebrate what we all do best. Marian Armitage Local food culture has never Chair, Shetland Food and Drink CONTENTS 3-21 Shetland Food and Drink Members SHETLAND ISLANDS COUNCIL 22-23 Centrefold map Funding rom The European Agricultural Fund or Rura Development Europ nvestin ura reas 24-29 Shetland Food and Drink Members Shetland LEADER rogramme 014-2020 30-42 Shetland Food and Drink and Shetland Islands uncil Associate Members Brochure design by Artmachine Shetland Brochure sponsorship by DFDS Logistics 2 FULL MEMBERS 1 Anderson Butchers Anderson Butchers is a family business that has provided the people of Shetland with quality, locally sourced meat products since 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Descendants of Thomas Mathewson
    Descendants of Thomas Mathewson Generation No. 1 1. Thomas1 Mathewson was born in Udaller in Copister, South Yell, Shetland, and died 1687. Child of Thomas Mathewson is: + 2 i. Matthew2 Thomason. Generation No. 2 2. Matthew2 Thomason (Thomas1 Mathewson) Child of Matthew Thomason is: + 3 i. Laurence3 Mathewson. Generation No. 3 3. Laurence3 Mathewson (Matthew2 Thomason, Thomas1 Mathewson) He married Ursula Henderson, daughter of Henry. More About Laurence Mathewson: Burial: of Aywick, East Yell, Shetland Children of Laurence Mathewson and Ursula Henderson are: + 4 i. Matthew4 Laurenson, born in Utrabister, North a Voe, Mid Yell, Shetland; died in of Utrabister, Stivler, Grindabister, Mid Yell, Shetland. + 5 ii. Catherine Laurenson, born 30 Jun 1734 in Aywick, Shetland; died in Garderhouse, Mid Yell, Shetand. Generation No. 4 4. Matthew4 Laurenson (Laurence3 Mathewson, Matthew2 Thomason, Thomas1 Mathewson) was born in Utrabister, North a Voe, Mid Yell, Shetland, and died in of Utrabister, Stivler, Grindabister, Mid Yell, Shetland. He married (1) Elizabeth Robertson, daughter of Robert Nicolson and Mary Anderson. She was born 1720 in Unst, Shetland. He married (2) Nanie Donaldson. Notes for Matthew Laurenson: Lands at Utrabister, Stivler, and Grindabister. Children of Matthew Laurenson and Elizabeth Robertson are: + 6 i. Janet5 Mathewson, born 14 Nov 1742 in Stivler, North a Voe, Mid Yell, Shetland. + 7 ii. William Mathewson, born 14 Feb 1745 in Stivler, North a Voe, Mid Yell, Shetland; died in of Utrabister and Gardie, Mid Yell, Shetland. 8 iii. James Mathewson, born 10 May 1748 in Stivler, North a Voe, Mid Yell, Shetland; died 1760. + 9 iv. Margaret Mathewson, born 02 Jul 1748 in Utrabister, North a Voe, Mid Yell, Shetland.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Sanitary Survey Programme
    Scottish Sanitary Survey Programme Sanitary Survey Report Production Area: Hamnavoe SI 348 January 2012 Report Distribution – Hamnavoe Date Name Agency Linda Galbraith Scottish Government Mike Watson Scottish Government Morag MacKenzie SEPA Douglas Sinclair SEPA Fiona Garner Scottish Water Alex Adrian Crown Estate Dawn Manson Shetland Island Council Sean Williamson NAFC Scalloway Christopher Harvester Thomason Chris Webb Northern Isles Salmon Hamnavoe Sanitary Survey Report V1.0 10/05/2011 i Table of Contents I. Executive Summary .................................................................................. 1 II. Sampling Plan ........................................................................................... 3 III. Report ................................................................................................... 4 1. General Description .................................................................................. 4 2. Fishery ...................................................................................................... 5 3. Human Population .................................................................................... 6 4. Sewage Discharges .................................................................................. 8 5. Geology and Soils ................................................................................... 11 6. Land Cover ............................................................................................. 12 7. Farm Animals .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sullom Voe Marine Safety Management System (2019)
    Shetland Islands Council Sullom Voe Marine Safety Management System (2019) Page intentionally left blank Sullom Voe Issue 4.0 Marine Safety Management System October 2019 Shetland Islands Council Sullom Voe - Marine Safety Management System The Shetland Islands Council (SIC) ‘Sullom Voe Marine Safety Management System’ provides the system by which the Port and Harbour of Sullom Voe complies with the requirements of The Port Marine Safety Code, referred to as ‘the Code’ within this document. The Code has been released by the Department of Transport (DfT) and is a supplemented by the Code’s Guide to Good Practice. This document has been prepared using the latest version of the Code published in November 2016 , and the accompanying Guide to Good Practice, published in February 2018. The Sullom Voe Marine Safety Management System (MSMS) document is supported by a ‘SIC MaSMS’, which describes how SIC’s marine policies are designed and implemented across all SIC Ports and Harbours. SIC also publish an ‘SIC Marine Safety Policy’ which provides a public statement of the Harbour Authority’s policies and confirmation of the Code’s adoption Revision Approved Version Date Prepared By Checked By Checked by By Duty Holder ABPmer: ABPmer: January Designated Person: 1.0 Monty Smedley Claire Brown Review copy 2013 Capt Trevor Auld Project Manager Project Director ABPmer: P M Morgan September C Reeves 1.1 Monty Smedley Deputy Harbour 11 October 2013 2013 Harbour Master Project Manager Master P M Morgan S Skinner M Irvine 2.0 June 2015 Acting Harbour 28 August 2015 Port Safety Officer Pilot Master S Skinner G Maitland 3.0 August 2018 P Bryant - DHM Port Safety 27 May 2019 Harbour Master Officer R Gordon October S Skinner G Maitland 4.0 Deputy Harbour 28 October 2019 2019 Port Safety Officer Harbour Master Master Page i of v Sullom Voe Issue 4.0 Marine Safety Management System October 2019 Contents 1.
    [Show full text]