About (541) 332-0675 (Pacific Time) Fax (928) 962-9430 Dromaius Novaehollandiae Fax (123) 456-7890

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

About (541) 332-0675 (Pacific Time) Fax (928) 962-9430 Dromaius Novaehollandiae Fax (123) 456-7890 Kingdom Animalia The Pendulous Pouch FACTS FOR THE TEACHER Phylum Chordata In the lower part of the trachea, just before the thoracic inlet, is a segment of Subphylum Vertebrata trachea comprised of 7 to 12 incomplete rings that form a tracheal diverticulum or Class Aves open cleft. A very thin membrane covers this cleft. During breeding season this Order Struthioniformes membrane enlarges, creating a pendulous pouch. This pouch is easy to see in Family Dromaiidae (emu) females during their first three years of Genus Dromaius (emu) breeding, but in subsequent years does not enlarge as much. Males also have Species this cleft, but the membrane does not enlarge as much. This cleft is the source Dromaius baudinianus (extinct) of the booming and grunting. Dromaius ater (extinct) Dromaius ocypus (extinct) Dromaius novaehollandiae Sub-species D. novaehollandiae novaehollandiae D. novaehollandiae woodwardi D. novaehollandiae rothschildi From the ©American Emu Association All Rights Reserved D. novaehollandiae diemenensis American Emu Association (extinct) P.O. Box 224 Sixes, OR 97476 (541) 332-0675 (Pacific Time) About Fax (928) 962-9430 http://www.aea-emu.org Dromaius novaehollandiae Fax (123) 456-7890 Dromaius novaehollandiae D. novaehollandiae woodwardi – These three sub-species are interbreeding in both Australia and the United States. On maturity and A large cursorial bird, Dromaius during breeding novaehollandiae originated in Australia Extinct Species of Dromaius season these birds but is raised on farms throughout the have a ruff or bib United States for it’s lean red meat and There are four other known species/sub- of feathers starting food by-products such as fat, hide and species of Dromaius that are now extinct. a few inches below feathers. Dromaius novaehollandiae the head. This ruff actually consists of three subspecies of D. ocypus exists only as a fossil appears darker than emu. that of the D. novaehollandiae diemenensis – This As you look at the birds being raised on novaehollandiae novaehollandiae and the subspecies of novaehollandiae was emu farms, can you guess which of these pendulous pouch is not as apparent. The reportedly a large emu with dark feathers. sub-species were the parent stocks of body is slender and the legs longer than The body type was similar to that of those birds? that of novaehollandiae novaehollandiae. novaehollandiae novaehollandiae. It was Overall the feathers are paler than the found on the large island of Tasmania. The The three living sub-species are: other two subspecies. This sub-specie Tasmanian Emu became extinct around originated in northern Australia. 1850. D. novaehollandiae novaehollandiae – D. novaehollandiae rothschildi – D. baudinianus - The Kangaroo Island On maturity and Emu became extinct around 1827. during breeding On maturity this season, these birds bird does not have a D. ater - King Island Emu – At 4 and half have a cream- ruff or bib. It looks feet tall and weighing under 60 pounds colored (or whitish) ‘flat-chested’ fully grown, this black feathered emu ruff or bib of compared to the was the smallest of the species. You may feathers starting a other two sub- find it referred to as d. minor or as the few inches below species. The dwarf emu. This emu lived on King the head. The pendulous pouch is larger pendulous pouch is Island, the northwestern island in than in other two sub-species and sways almost non-existent in this emu. Like the Tasmania, Australia. By 1805 it had during strut. novaehollandiae woodwardi, the been hunted to extinction by sealers and metatarsus bone is long with a small visiting sailors. The one thing these three The metatarsus bone is shorter with a diameter, making this bird taller than extinct southern Australia emus have in larger diameter. The body is wider than novaehollandiae novaehollandiae. The common is that they all had darker the other two sub-species. This sub- feathers are the darkest of the three sub- feathers than the mainland emus. For specie originated in southeastern species. This subspecies originates in this reason early settlers referred to either Australia. southwestern Australia. black emu or spotted emu. Dromaius novaehollandiae is the spotted emu. .
Recommended publications
  • Folklore & History of the Heritage Highway
    Folklore & History of the Heritage Highway Keep an eye out between Tunbridge and Kemton for sixteen silhouettes. Some are quite close to road, some are high on the hilltops. What stories can they tell us about the history of this intriguing region. Page 2 Two hundred years on there’s still plenty of ways to get held up on the Heritage Highway The Silhouette sculpture trail along the Southern half of the Midland Highway is completed, nine years after it was started by locals Folko Kooper and Maureen Craig. The trail between Tunbridge and Kempton, has become an enjoyable feature of the journey along the highway. Installation of four coaching-related sculptures at Kempton earlier this year marked completion of a trail which now has 16 pieces. Page 3 Leaving Oatlands towards the North, on the right side of the Heritage Highway. Troop Of Soldiers—St Peters Pass Van Diemen’s Land was first and foremost a British military outpost. Soldiers accompanied the convicts on the transport ships, supervised the rationing of supplies, and guarded the chain gangs, They also supervised construction of bridges public and private buildings– as well as watching out for the French! Most didn’t stay long. There were other British interests around the world to defend. Many of the convicts they guarded had also been soldiers, but were reduced to committing crime once the wars they were fighting ended and they were out of a job. Chain Gang—North off York Plains Turn-off There was a lot to do to build the colony of Van Diemen’s Land.
    [Show full text]
  • 3966 Tour Op 4Col
    The Tasmanian Advantage natural and cultural features of Tasmania a resource manual aimed at developing knowledge and interpretive skills specific to Tasmania Contents 1 INTRODUCTION The aim of the manual Notesheets & how to use them Interpretation tips & useful references Minimal impact tourism 2 TASMANIA IN BRIEF Location Size Climate Population National parks Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area (WHA) Marine reserves Regional Forest Agreement (RFA) 4 INTERPRETATION AND TIPS Background What is interpretation? What is the aim of your operation? Principles of interpretation Planning to interpret Conducting your tour Research your content Manage the potential risks Evaluate your tour Commercial operators information 5 NATURAL ADVANTAGE Antarctic connection Geodiversity Marine environment Plant communities Threatened fauna species Mammals Birds Reptiles Freshwater fishes Invertebrates Fire Threats 6 HERITAGE Tasmanian Aboriginal heritage European history Convicts Whaling Pining Mining Coastal fishing Inland fishing History of the parks service History of forestry History of hydro electric power Gordon below Franklin dam controversy 6 WHAT AND WHERE: EAST & NORTHEAST National parks Reserved areas Great short walks Tasmanian trail Snippets of history What’s in a name? 7 WHAT AND WHERE: SOUTH & CENTRAL PLATEAU 8 WHAT AND WHERE: WEST & NORTHWEST 9 REFERENCES Useful references List of notesheets 10 NOTESHEETS: FAUNA Wildlife, Living with wildlife, Caring for nature, Threatened species, Threats 11 NOTESHEETS: PARKS & PLACES Parks & places,
    [Show full text]
  • Aquila 23. Évf. 1916
    A madarak palaeontologiájának története és irodalma. Irta : DR. Lambrecht Kálmán. Minden ismeret történetének eredete többé-kevésbbé homályba vész. Az els úttörk még maguk is csak tapogatóznak; leírásaik — a kezdet nehézségeivel küzdve — nem szabatosak, több bennük a sej- dít, mint a positiv elem. Fokozottan áll ez a palaeontologiára, amely- nek gyakran bizony igen hiányos anyaga gazdag recens összehasonlító anyagot és alapos morphologiai ismereteket igényel. A palaeontologia legismertebb történetíróinak, MARSH-nak^ és ZiTTEL-nek2 chronologiai beosztásait figyelmen kívül hagyva, ehelyütt Abel3 szellemes beosztását fogadjuk el és megkülönböztetünk a madár- palaeontologia történetében 1. phantasticus, 2. descriptiv és 3. morpho- logiai és phylogenetikai periódust. Nagyon természetes, hogy a fossilis madarak ismerete karöltve haladt a recens madarak osteologiájának megismerésével, 4 mert a palaeon- tologus csakis recens comparativ anyag és vizsgálatok alapján foghat munkához. De viszont igaz az is, hogy a morphologus sem mozdulhat meg az si alakok vázrendszerének ismerete nélkül, nem is szólva arról, hogy a gyakran nagyon töredékes fossilis maradványok mennyi érdekes morphologiai megfigyelésre vezették már a búvárokat. A phantasticus periódus. Ez a periódus, amely — összehasonlítás hiján — túlnyomóan speculativ alapon mvelte a tudományt, a XVIll. századdal, vagyis CuviER felléptével végzdik. Eltekintve Albertus MAGNUS-nak (1193—1280, Marsh szerint 1 Marsh, 0. C, Geschichte und Methode der paläoiitologischen Entdeckungen. — Kosmos VI. 1879.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Tasmania's Offshore Islands and Their Role in Nature
    Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 154, 2020 83 OVERVIEW OF TASMANIA’S OFFSHORE ISLANDS AND THEIR ROLE IN NATURE CONSERVATION by Sally L. Bryant and Stephen Harris (with one text-figure, two tables, eight plates and two appendices) Bryant, S.L. & Harris, S. 2020 (9:xii): Overview of Tasmania’s offshore islands and their role in nature conservation.Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 154: 83–106. https://doi.org/10.26749/rstpp.154.83 ISSN: 0080–4703. Tasmanian Land Conservancy, PO Box 2112, Lower Sandy Bay, Tasmania 7005, Australia (SLB*); Department of Archaeology and Natural History, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601 (SH). *Author for correspondence: Email: [email protected] Since the 1970s, knowledge of Tasmania’s offshore islands has expanded greatly due to an increase in systematic and regional surveys, the continuation of several long-term monitoring programs and the improved delivery of pest management and translocation programs. However, many islands remain data-poor especially for invertebrate fauna, and non-vascular flora, and information sources are dispersed across numerous platforms. While more than 90% of Tasmania’s offshore islands are statutory reserves, many are impacted by a range of disturbances, particularly invasive species with no decision-making framework in place to prioritise their management. This paper synthesises the significant contribution offshore islands make to Tasmania’s land-based natural assets and identifies gaps and deficiencies hampering their protection. A continuing focus on detailed gap-filling surveys aided by partnership restoration programs and collaborative national forums must be strengthened if we are to capitalise on the conservation benefits islands provide in the face of rapidly changing environmental conditions and pressure for future use.
    [Show full text]
  • Extinct Tasmanian Emu*
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ZENODO Vol. Ill,“I Hill, Notes from Guildford, IF.H. .1904 J 229 Microtribonyx ventralis.—On the river. BURHIXUS GRALLARIUS.—From July, 1902, to June, 1903, I only heard a single bird ; after that they were to be heard almost every night. -Fgialitis MELANOPS.—26/4/03.—Flock of about a dozen Dottrel on river ; appear to be the Black-fronted, besides another species. PLEGADIS FALCINELLUS (?).—There were a few Ibis about in the spring of 1902. I think this was the species. Saw none in 1903. NOTOPHOYX NOViE-HOLLANDER.—Common on the river. NOTOPHOYX PACIFICA. Nycticorax CALEDONICUS. Ardetta PUSILLA.—28/11/03.—Nest with three fresh eggs in rushes on river ; nest consisted merely of a handful of fragments of rushes, and fell to pieces on being removed. I had unfortunately neglected to photo¬ graph it. 30/11/03.—Flushed bird at same place; discovered another egg on ground close by where the nest had been. DUPETOR GOULDI.—Saw the Black Bittern twice on the Swan. Reported also from Helena. Phalacrocorax carbo, P. HYPOLEUCUS, P. melanoleucus.—Cormorants always plentiful on the river; P. hypoleucus the commonest. 2/3/03.— Noticed a Cormorant on a log in the river ; it remained in a peculiar attitude, swaying in the wind with both wings half-spread for a long time, as if it were trying to dry them in the breeze. PODICIPES POLIOCEPHALUS.—Reported on river. Chenopis ATRATA.—Have only heard Black Swans flying across.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnificent Survivor 3
    Magnificent Survivor - Continued Existence of the Tasmanian Tiger 20 PART A – It Does Exist Now Chapter 2 – Recovery Action Plan Chapter 2. Recovery Action Plan. This chapter is divided into two sections. The first suggests what should happen if a Tasmanian tiger is filmed or captured alive, and the second shows a copy of a formal Recovery Action Plan which was drafted during 2002 in readiness for the author’s own photographic proof. All agree, the best, and perhaps the only way to prove thylacine existence is to produce a body. According to Paddle (p23) “the criterion for establishing the existence of the thylacine beyond 1936 can only be met through the production of a body, either dead, or preferably alive.” It is rare to find a carcass of even the most common animal in the Tasmanian bush (usually eaten overnight by Tasmanian devils), so the chance of finding a dead Tasmanian tiger is effectively zero. Capture of a live thylacine is more likely, and would be justified if it saved the species. Intentionally trying to capture a thylacine is not child’s play however, as the species is extremely nervous, susceptible to shock, and could easily die if captured. Death of one among such a small population may cause more problems than it solves. Current stance of the Tasmanian government is that trying to catch a thylacine is illegal (even though the species is extinct), and fines are applicable. The author does not encourage people to try and catch a thylacine. If film evidence is substantial and clear, with a good amount of detail, then this will be enough to force authorities to act, and then they can take the risks.
    [Show full text]
  • Convergent Regulatory Evolution and the Origin of Flightlessness in Palaeognathous Birds
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/262584; this version posted February 8, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Convergent regulatory evolution and the origin of flightlessness in palaeognathous birds Timothy B. Sackton* (1,2), Phil Grayson (2,3), Alison Cloutier (2,3), Zhirui Hu (4), Jun S. Liu (4), Nicole E. Wheeler (5,6), Paul P. Gardner (5,7), Julia A. Clarke (8), Allan J. Baker (9,10), Michele Clamp (1), Scott V. Edwards* (2,3) Affiliations: 1) Informatics Group, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA 2) Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA 3) Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA 4) Department of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA 5) School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, New Zealand 6) Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK 7) Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, New Zealand 8) Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA 9) Department of Natural History, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Canada 10) Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada *correspondence to: TBS ([email protected]) or SVE ([email protected]) bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/262584; this version posted February 8, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. The relative roles of regulatory and protein evolution in the origin and loss of convergent phenotypic traits is a core question in evolutionary biology.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient DNA Suggests Dwarf and 'Giant' Emu Are Conspecific
    Ancient DNA Suggests Dwarf and ‘Giant’ Emu Are Conspecific Tim H. Heupink, Leon Huynen, David M. Lambert* Griffith School of Environment and School of Biomolecular and Physical Sciences, Griffith University, Nathan, Australia Abstract Background: The King Island Emu (Dromaius ater) of Australia is one of several extinct emu taxa whose taxonomic relationship to the modern Emu (D. novaehollandiae) is unclear. King Island Emu were mainly distinguished by their much smaller size and a reported darker colour compared to modern Emu. Methodology and Results: We investigated the evolutionary relationships between the King Island and modern Emu by the recovery of both nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences from sub-fossil remains. The complete mitochondrial control (1,094 bp) and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) region (1,544 bp), as well as a region of the melanocortin 1 receptor gene (57 bp) were sequenced using a multiplex PCR approach. The results show that haplotypes for King Island Emu fall within the diversity of modern Emu. Conclusions: These data show the close relationship of these emu when compared to other congeneric bird species and indicate that the King Island and modern Emu share a recent common ancestor. King Island emu possibly underwent insular dwarfism as a result of phenotypic plasticity. The close relationship between the King Island and the modern Emu suggests it is most appropriate that the former should be considered a subspecies of the latter. Although both taxa show a close genetic relationship they differ drastically in size. This study also suggests that rates of morphological and neutral molecular evolution are decoupled.
    [Show full text]
  • The Endangered Kiwi: a Review
    REVIEW ARTICLE Folia Zool. – 54(1–2): 1–20 (2005) The endangered kiwi: a review James SALES Bosman street 39, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa; e-mail: [email protected] Received 13 December 2004; Accepted 1 May 2005 A b s t r a c t . Interest in ratites has necessitated a review of available information on the unique endangered kiwi (Apteryx spp.). Five different species of kiwis, endemic to the three islands of New Zealand, are recognized by the Department of Conservation, New Zealand, according to genetic and biological differences: the North Island Brown Kiwi (Apteryx mantelli), Okarito Brown Kiwi/Rowi (A. rowi), Tokoeka (A. australis), Great Spotted Kiwi/Roroa (A. haastii), and Little Spotted Kiwi (A owenii). As predators were found to be the main reason for declining kiwi numbers, predator control is a main objective of management techniques to prevent kiwis becoming extinct in New Zealand. Further considerations include captive breeding and release, and establishment of kiwi sanctuaries. Body size and bill measurements are different between species and genders within species. Kiwis have the lowest basal rates of metabolism compared with all avian standards. A relative low body temperature (38 ºC), burrowing, a highly developed sense of smell, paired ovaries in females, and a low growth rate, separate kiwis from other avian species. Kiwis have long-term partnerships. Females lay an egg that is approximately 400 % above the allometrically expected value, with an incubation period of 75–85 days. Kiwis mainly feed on soil invertebrate, with the main constituent being earthworms, and are prone to parasites and diseases found in other avian species.
    [Show full text]
  • First Nuclear Genome Assembly of an Extinct Moa Species, the Little Bush
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/262816; this version posted July 11, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. First nuclear genome assembly of an extinct moa species, the little bush moa (Anomalopteryx didiformis) Alison Cloutier1,2*, Timothy B. Sackton3, Phil Grayson1,2, Scott V. Edwards1,2, Allan J. Baker4,5¶ 1Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge MA, 02138 USA 2Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge MA, 02138 USA 3Informatics Group, Harvard University, 38 Oxford Street, Cambridge MA, 02138 USA 4Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, 25 Willcox Street, Toronto ON, M5S 3B2 Canada 5Department of Natural History, Royal Ontario Museum, 100 Queen’s Park, Toronto ON, M5S 2C6 Canada ¶Deceased *Corresponding author: [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/262816; this version posted July 11, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. ABSTRACT High throughput sequencing (HTS) has revolutionized the field of ancient DNA (aDNA) by facilitating recovery of nuclear DNA for greater inference of evolutionary processes in extinct species than is possible from mitochondrial DNA alone. We used HTS to obtain ancient DNA from the little bush moa (Anomalopteryx didiformis), one of the iconic species of large, flightless birds that became extinct following human settlement of New Zealand in the 13th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Gastrointestinal Parasites of a Population of Emus (Dromaius Novaehollandiae) in Brazil S
    Brazilian Journal of Biology https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.189922 ISSN 1519-6984 (Print) Original Article ISSN 1678-4375 (Online) Gastrointestinal parasites of a population of emus (Dromaius novaehollandiae) in Brazil S. S. M. Galloa , C. S. Teixeiraa , N. B. Ederlib and F. C. R. Oliveiraa* aLaboratório de Sanidade Animal – LSA, Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Agropecuárias – CCTA, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense – UENF, CEP 28035-302, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brasil bInstituto do Noroeste Fluminense de Educação Superior – INFES, Universidade Federal Fluminense – UFF, 28470-000, Santo Antônio de Pádua, RJ, Brasil *e-mail: [email protected] Received: January 9, 2018 – Accepted: June 19, 2018 – Distributed: February 28, 2020 (With 2 figures) Abstract Emus are large flightless birds in the ratite group and are native to Australia. Since the mid-1980s, there has been increased interest in the captive breeding of emus for the production of leather, meat and oil. The aim of this study was to identify gastrointestinal parasites in the feces of emus Dromaius novaehollandiae from a South American scientific breeding. Fecal samples collected from 13 birds were examined by direct smears, both with and without centrifugation, as well as by the fecal flotation technique using Sheather’s sugar solution. Trophozoites, cysts and oocysts of protozoa and nematode eggs were morphologically and morphometrically evaluated. Molecular analysis using PCR assays with specific primers for the genera Entamoeba, Giardia and Cryptosporidium were performed. Trophozoites and cysts of Entamoeba spp. and Giardia spp., oocysts of Eimeria spp. and Isospora dromaii, as well as eggs belonging to the Ascaridida order were found in the feces.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny, Transposable Element and Sex Chromosome Evolution of The
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/750109; this version posted August 28, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Phylogeny, transposable element and sex chromosome evolution of the basal lineage of birds Zongji Wang1,2,3,* Jilin Zhang4,*, Xiaoman Xu1, Christopher Witt5, Yuan Deng3, Guangji Chen3, Guanliang Meng3, Shaohong Feng3, Tamas Szekely6,7, Guojie Zhang3,8,9,10,#, Qi Zhou1,2,11,# 1. MOE Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis & Protection, Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China 2. Department of Molecular Evolution and Development, University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria 3. BGI-Shenzhen, Beishan Industrial Zone, Shenzhen 518083, China 4. Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden 5. Department of Biology and the Museum of Southwestern Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA 6. State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Department of Ecology, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China 7. Milner Center for Evolution, Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, BA1 7AY, UK 8 State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China 9. Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark 10. Center for Excellence in Animal Evolution and Genetics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China 11. Center for Reproductive Medicine, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University * These authors contributed equally to the work.
    [Show full text]