DOCSLIB.ORG

FSC National Risk Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FSC National Risk Assessment FSC National Risk Assessment For Georgia DEVELOPED ACCORDING TO PROCEDURE FSC-PRO-60-002 V 3-0 Version V 1-0 Code FSC-NRA-GE V1-0 DRAFT National approval National decision body: Working Group of Georgia on FSC Standards (WGFS) Date: 15 APRIL 2016 International approval FSC International Center: Policy and Standards Unit Date: XX MONTH 201X International contact Name: Email address: Period of validity Date of approval: XX MONTH 201X Valid until: (date of approval + 5 years) Body responsible for NRA WGFS Georgia, Ilia Osepashvili, maintenance [email protected] FSC-NRA-GE V1-0 DRAFT NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR GEORGIA 2016 – 1 of 110 – Contents Risk designations in finalized risk assessments for Georgia ....................................................... 3 Background information .............................................................................................................. 4 List of experts involved in the risk assessment and their contact details ..................................... 5 National Risk Assessment maintenance ..................................................................................... 6 Complaints and disputes regarding the approved National Risk Assessment ............................. 7 List of key stakeholders for consultation ..................................................................................... 8 Risk assessments ....................................................................................................................... 9 Controlled wood category 1: Illegally harvested wood................................................................. 9 Overview ............................................................................................................................. 9 Sources of legal timber in Georgia .................................................................................... 11 Risk assessment (National level) ...................................................................................... 12 Recommended control measures ..................................................................................... 55 Controlled wood category 2: Wood harvested in violation of traditional and human rights ........ 57 Risk assessment ............................................................................................................... 57 Recommended control measures ..................................................................................... 57 Detailed analysis ............................................................................................................... 58 Controlled wood category 3: Wood from forests in which high conservation values are threatened by management activities ....................................................................................... 82 Overview ........................................................................................................................... 82 Experts consulted ............................................................................................................. 83 Risk assessment ............................................................................................................... 84 Mandatory control measures ............................................................................................. 99 Information sources ........................................................................................................ 102 Controlled wood category 4: Wood from forests being converted to plantations or non-forest use ............................................................................................................................................... 105 Risk assessment ............................................................................................................. 105 Recommended control measures ................................................................................... 107 Controlled wood category 5: Wood from forests in which genetically modified trees are planted ............................................................................................................................................... 108 Risk assessment ............................................................................................................. 108 Recommended control measures ................................................................................... 110 FSC-NRA-GE V1-0 DRAFT NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR GEORGIA 2016 – 2 of 110 – Risk designations in finalized risk assessments for Georgia Indicator Risk designation (including functional scale when relevant) Controlled wood category 1: Illegally harvested wood 1.1 Low risk 1.2 Low risk 1.3 Low risk 1.4 Specified risk 1.5 Low risk 1.6 Low risk 1.7 Low risk 1.8 Specified risk 1.9 Specified risk 1.10 Specified risk 1.11 Specified risk 1.12 Low risk 1.13 Low risk 1.14 Low risk 1.15 N/A 1.16 Low risk 1.17 Low risk 1.18 Low risk 1.19 Low risk 1.20 Low risk 1.21 N/A Controlled wood category 2: Wood harvested in violation of traditional and human rights 2.1 Low risk 2.2 Specified risk 2.3 Low risk Controlled wood category 3: Wood from forests where high conservation values are threatened by management activities 3.0 Low risk for forests within PAs; Specified risk for all other forests 3.1 Low risk for forests within PAs; Specified risk for all other forests 3.2 Low risk for forests within PAs; Specified risk for all other forests 3.3 Low risk for forests within PAs; Specified risk for all other forests 3.4 Low risk for forests within PAs; Specified risk for all other forests 3.5 Low risk for forests within PAs; Specified risk for all other forests 3.6 Low risk for forests within PAs and forests managed by the Georgian Orthodox Church; Specified risk for all other forests FSC-NRA-GE V1-0 DRAFT NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR GEORGIA 2016 – 3 of 110 – Controlled wood category 4: Wood from forests being converted to plantations or non-forest use 4.1 Low risk Controlled wood category 5: Wood from forests in which genetically modified trees are planted 5.1 Low risk Background information Initially, the process of NRA development in Georgia started in September 2014. The first draft (before wide-scale stakeholder consultations) was developed by the end of December in the same year. The standards FSC-STD-40-005 V 2-1 and FSC-PRO-60-002 V2-0 were used as a guidance to this process. This draft took into consideration the opinions and positions of the members of the Working Group of Georgia on FSC Standards (WGFS, registered by FSC PSU on 4 July 2014). However, due to the introduction of new requirements by FSC with respect to CW NRA (i.e. the approval of FSC-PRO-60-002 V3-0, FSC-PRO-60-002a V1-0 and related documents), this process was suspended and the first draft was not approved by either WGFS or FSC. In the late summer of 2015, the process was renewed, based on the new FSC requirements, including Centralized NRA (CNRA) development. On the basis of decision of FSC, CNRA was launched for CW Categories 1, 2, 4 and 5 in Georgia. The NRA was to be conducted for Category 3. WGFS was assigned a role of the national decision body in this new process. The WGFS consists of six members, where each of the three chambers (social, environmental and economic) is represented by the two persons. The Coordinator of the group is Ilia Osepashvili, Senior Forest Officer of WWF-Caucasus Programme Office (WWF-CauPO). WWF-CauPO financially supports the NRA process in Georgia within the framework of the regional Program “European Neighborhood and Partnership Instrument East Countries Forest Law Enforcement and Governance II” (FLEG II). The program is financially supported by the European Commission and Austrian development Agency. The WGFS consists of the following members (further information about the WGFS members and the Coordinator, including contact details, is given in the Proposal for development of the FSC National Risk Assessment for Georgia, dated June 2015): Social chamber: Mr. Tamaz Tskhakaia and Mr. Nikoloz Burduli; Environmental chamber: Ms. Natia Iordanishvili and Mr. Irakli Macharashvili; Economic chamber: Mr. Malkhaz Rogava and Mr. Mamuka Khoshtaria. The initial draft on CNRA for Category 2, developed by the consultant hired by FSC, was received by the Coordinator of WGFS in September 2015. The English version was translated into Georgian and both versions were sent to the working group for comments. The comments from the WGFS were received at the beginning of November 2015. The representatives of environmental and economic chamber (one working group member from each chamber) made comments on Indicator 2.1, for which “Low Risk” had been assigned. Without challenging the assigned category of risk, they raised concern related to human rights. Specifically, the villagers living in the close proximity to administrative boundary of South Ossetia are under constant threat of being kidnapped by the Ossetian separatist militiamen (backed by the military of the Russian Federation) when collecting fuelwood in the forests surrounding their villages. These villagers are being accused by the separatists of crossing the “state border of the South Ossetian republic”. These individual cases, though, cannot be regarded as a basis for changing the category from “low” to “specified” risk. Abkhazia and South Ossetia were not included into the NRA, because these two regions are not presently de facto controlled by the Georgian Government. These regions are recognized as integral
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rebuilding an Icon: Mtatsminda Funicular Station
    Investor.A MAGAZINE OF THE AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE IN GEORGIA geISSUE 34 AUG.-SEP. 2013 Obstacles for Tourism Issue: Education Challenge Facing Hospitality Industry Agriculture and the Agribusiness Sector: Problems and the Need for Change A Magician in the Kitchen Rebuilding an Icon: Mtatsminda Funicular Station Investor.ge AUGUST-SEPTEMBER 2013 3 Investor.ge Investor.ge CONTENT AmCham Executive Director 6 Investment in Brief 25 Education Challenge Facing Amy Denman A brief synopsis of new investments Hospitality Industry and business news. Georgians’ love of guests and Editor in Chief hospitality has failed to cross over Molly Corso 8 Finance Minister Nodar from culture at home to practice in Khaduri: Georgian Securities business. Copy Editor Market in “Embryonic” Stage Alexander Melin An interview with Minister Nodar 28 The Travel Advisory Khaduri about the government’s Conundrum Marketing & Promotion plans to recharge the local stock Georgia is a gem for tourists, but Sophia Chakvetadze market. foreign embassy travel advisories paint a less than tempting picture. Promotional Design Investor.ge looks at why, and what Levan Baratashvili 10 TI Georgia: Georgia’s Procurement System impact it is having on tourism. Magazine Design and Layout Transparent but Loopholes Giorgi Megrelishvili Remain 30 Shopping for Souveniers Transparency International Why is it so hard to spend money Writers published a report on Georgia’s on souvenirs outside of Tbilisi? Emil Avdaliani, Helene Bedwell, Avtandil procurement system in June. Chedia, Molly Corso, Maia Edilashvili, 32 Independence of the Judiciary Alexander Melin, Nino Patsuria 13 ISET: Agriculture and the in Georgia: Trends and Agribusiness Sector Challenges Photographs A report by ISET about the BGI’s Otar Kakhidze looks at Helene Bedwell, Molly Corso, AmCham agriculture sector’s problems and changes and challenges for the Picnic photographers the need for change.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Defender of Georgia
    2018 The Public Defender of Georgia www.ombudsman.ge 1 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER OF GEORGIA, 2018 This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the author and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. 2 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER OF GEORGIA THE SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS IN GEORGIA 2018 2018 www.ombudsman.ge www.ombudsman.ge 3 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER OF GEORGIA, 2018 OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER OF GEORGIA 6, Ramishvili str, 0179, Tbilisi, Georgia Tel: +995 32 2913814; +995 32 2913815 Fax: +995 32 2913841 E-mail: [email protected] 4 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................................13 1. FULFILMENT OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS MADE BY THE PUBLIC DEFENDER OF GEORGIA IN THE 2017 PARLIAMENTARY REPORT ......................................................................19 2. RIGHT TO LIFE .....................................................................................................................................28 2.1. CASE OF TEMIRLAN MACHALIKASHVILI .............................................................................21 2.2. MURDER OF JUVENILES ON KHORAVA STREET ...............................................................29 2.3. OUTCOMES OF THE STUDY OF THE CASE-FILES OF THE INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED ON THE ALLEGED MURDER OF ZVIAD GAMSAKHURDIA, THE FIRST
    [Show full text]
  • Community Based and Civil Society Organizations of Mtskheta-Mtianeti Region S
    COMMUNITY BASED AND CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS OF MTSKHETA-MTIANETI REGION S E S C I L V A R CARING O E G MANAGEMENT S MISSION NON-GOVERNMENTAL VISION ORGANIZATIONS STRATEGY TEAMWORKH ELP LIFE GOALS STRATEGY NON-GOVERNMENTAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES CARING VISION MTSKHETA-MTIANETI 2 0 2 0 Community Based and Civil Society Organizations of Mtskheta-Mtianeti Region The information leaflet was published with the support of the European Union (EU) and the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung (KAS) as part of the Georgian Civil Society Sustainability Initiative project. Its content is entirely the responsibility of the Mtskheta-Mtianeti Regional Hub “For Better Future» and may not reflect the views of the European Union (EU) and the Konrad- Adenauer-Stiftung (KAS). ”Georgian Civil Society Sustainability Initiative” was developed and is implemented by the consortium lead by the Konrad - Adenauer - Stiftung in cooperation with four Georgian Civil Society Organizations: Civil Society Institute (CSI), Center for Training and Consultancy (CTC), Center for Strategic Research and Development of Georgia (CSRDG) and the Education Development and Employment Center (EDEC). The project is funded by the European Union and co-financed by the Konrad-Adenauer- Stiftung. Mtskheta-Mtianeti 2020 3 About the information brochure The information brochure presents 34 Community Based and Civil Society organizations of Mtskheta-Mtianeti Region. Organizations are divided according to the municipalities and each organization page contains basic contact information and fields of activity. This information was shared with Mtskheta-Mtianeti Regional Hub by the heads or contact persons of each organization and is based on November 2020 data resources. The information brochure aims to promote the community based and civil society organizations in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Realizing the Urban Potential in Georgia: National Urban Assessment
    REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA National Urban Assessment ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA NATIONAL URBAN ASSESSMENT ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2016 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 632 4444; Fax +63 2 636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2016. Printed in the Philippines. ISBN 978-92-9257-352-2 (Print), 978-92-9257-353-9 (e-ISBN) Publication Stock No. RPT168254 Cataloging-In-Publication Data Asian Development Bank. Realizing the urban potential in Georgia—National urban assessment. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2016. 1. Urban development.2. Georgia.3. National urban assessment, strategy, and road maps. I. Asian Development Bank. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. This publication was finalized in November 2015 and statistical data used was from the National Statistics Office of Georgia as available at the time on http://www.geostat.ge The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Assistance Layout with Instructions
    Environmental Impact Assessment December 2018 First Draft GEO: North–South Corridor (Kvesheti-Kobi) Road Project Part 3 (Sections D-E) Prepared by JV Anas International Enterprise S.P.A., Gestione Progetti Ingegneria S.R.L., and IRD Engineering S.R.L. for the Roads Department of the Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia and the Asian Development Bank. This environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Environmental Impact Assessment for the Kvesheti-Kobi Road Section D. EnvironMental Laws, Standards and Regulations D.1 Overview 332. This section of the EIA provides a summary of: (i) Environmental Legislation of Georgia; (ii) The Administrative Framework; (iii) Environmental Regulations and Standards of Georgia; (iv) National Technical Regulations Relevant to the Project; (v) Environmental Permitting Procedure; (vi) Permit and Licenses Required for Off-site Works During Construction; (vii) International Conventions Relevant to the Project Ratified by Georgia; (viii) An overview of the ADB and EBRD safeguard policies / performance requirements. D.2 General 333. Georgian legislation comprises the Constitution, environmental laws, international agreements, subordinate legislation, normative acts, presidential orders and governmental decrees, ministerial orders, instructions and regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Value Chain Analysis of Rural Tourism in Mtskheta-Mtianeti Region
    Value Chain Analysis of Rural Tourism in Mtskheta-Mtianeti Region Research Organic Agriculture and Rural Tourism Development in Mtskheta-Mtianeti Region Value Chain Analysis of Rural Tourism Implemented by Biological Farming Association ELKANA Funded by Austrian Development Cooperation Research Conducted by PMC Research Project Director Giorgi Khishtovani Researchers: Salome Solomnishvili Sopho Basilidze (Team Leader) Mariam Kobalia (Gender Expert) TBILISI, 2020 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 3 2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................................... 4 3. GRID MAP – RURAL TOURISM VALUE CHAIN ACTORS ....................................................................... 5 4. TOURISTS IN THE TARGET AREAS ............................................................................................................... 6 5. TOURIST LOCATIONS AND ASSETS ............................................................................................................ 8 6. TOURS AND GUIDES ........................................................................................................................................ 10 7. TRANSPORTATION ............................................................................................................................................ 10 8. ACCOMMODATION UNITS ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Development Programme of Georgia 2018-2021 Table of Contents
    REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME OF GEORGIA 2018-2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………7 II. Foreword……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………17 II.1 Introduction..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................17 II.2 Legal provisions......................................................................................................................................................................................................................17 II.3 Programming system ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................18 III.II.4 SituationThe institutional and trends framework with regard of regional to territorial policy................................ cohesion and ................................competitiveness................................…………………………………………………….........................................................2119 II.5 Donor support..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................20 III.1 General context .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    SFG2732 Public Disclosure Authorized THE STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT OF THE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM DEVELOPMENT STARTEGIES OF SAMTSKHE-JAVAKHETI AND MTSKETA-MTIANETI Public Disclosure Authorized Third Regional Development Project Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized December, 2016 Abbreviations GNTA Georgia National Tourism Administration EIA Environnemental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan RDS Regional Development Strategy RTDS Regional Tourism Development Strategy MDF Municipal Development Fund of Georgia MoA Ministry of Agriculture MoENRP Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia MoCMP Ministry of Culture and Monument Protection MESD Ministry of Economic and Sustaineble Developmnet NACHP National Agency for Cultural Heritage Protection PIU Project Implementation Unit RDP Regional Development Project SECHSA Strategic Environmental, Cultural Heritage and Social Assessment WB World Bank Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 THIRD REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (RDP III) ..................................................... 12 1.2 REGIONAL AND SECTORAL CONTEXT: RDS AND RTDS FOR SAMTSKHE- JAVAKHETI AND MTSKHETA-MTIANETI REGIONS ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aragvi River Basin Water Balance Approximation Based on Available Data
    ARAGVI RIVER BASIN WATER BALANCE APPROXIMATION BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA USAID GOVERNING FOR GROWTH (G4G) IN GEORGIA 30 SEPTEMBER 2016 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Deloitte Consulting LLP. The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. ARAGVI RIVER BASIN WATER BALANCE APPROXIMATION BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA USAID GOVERNING FOR GROWTH (G4G) IN GEORGIA CONTRACT NUMBER: AID-114-C-14-00007 DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP USAID | GEORGIA USAID CONTRACTING OFFICER’S REPRESENTATIVE: REVAZ ORMOTSADZE AUTHOR(S): GAMMA CONSULTING LTD WORK PLANNING: WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENT 3600 LANGUAGE: ENGLISH 30 SEPTEMBER 2016 DISCLAIMER: This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Deloitte Consulting LLP. The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. USAID | GOVERNING FOR GROWTH (G4G) IN GEORGIA ARAGVI RIVER BASIN WATER BALANCE i DATA Reviewed by: Georg Petersen, Davit Mujirishvili, Elene Ghubianuri, Keti Skhireli, Mariam Bakhtadze Project Component: Water Resource Management Component: USA07529-00-01-0112 Practice Area: Water Resource Management Key Words: Water Balance, Hydrological Parameters, Water Usage USAID | GOVERNING FOR GROWTH (G4G)
    [Show full text]
  • UNICEF Georgia COVID-19 Situation Report 20 January 2021
    UNICEF Georgia COVID-19 Situation Report 20 January 2021 HIGHLIGHTS • With financial support from USAID, all rural primary health care (PHC) doctors will enhance their knowledge on COVID-19 prevention and management through a centrali sed communication platform. UNICEF is providing internet access to 1,000 rural health clinics – please see WEEKLY FOCUS on page 4. • UNICEF, in partnership with Caritas Czech Republic, is carrying out trainings for 1,300 rural PHC professionals in the management of suspected or diagnosed COVID-19 cases as well as conducting remote maternal and child health consultations. • UNICEF handed over 1,050 boxes of food and hygiene supplies to the State Ministry for Reconciliation and Civic Equality for further distribution to vulnerable families residing near the Administrative Boundary Line, reaching over 4,200 individuals. • A youth hotline, as part of the child hotline “111”, was established to address adolescent and young people’s mental health and psychosocial needs during the COVID-19 pandemic, with 120 adolescents receiving confidential support so far. • The “Learn more about “COVID-19” TV programme was broadcast on nine regional TV channels, airing over 100 programmes with the latest information about COVID-19, reaching approximately 900,000 viewers per week. • In Abkhazia, Georgia, 398 families, including 1,249 children, received food and hygiene parcels. • UNICEF trained 100 preschool managers and education specialists in Adjara on supporting early child learning and development remotely in low and high technology contexts. SITUATION IN NUMBERS 249,934 2,987 13,549 478 Abkhazia UNICEF funding gap Confirmed Confirmed Child (<18 years) Quarantined Confirmed cases – 10,486 US$ 1,284,412 (29%) cases deaths cases Confirmed deaths – 152 HUMANITARIAN STRATEGY • UNICEF continues to work closely with the Government, WHO, and other United Nations and humanitarian partners to provide technical guidance and support.
    [Show full text]
  • 43405-025: Urban Services Improvement Investment Program
    Social Monitoring Report ____________________________________________________________________________ Project Number: 43405-025 Semi-annual Report (January – June 2020) July 2020 GEO: Urban Services Improvement Investment Program – Tranche 3 Prepared by United Water Supply Company of Georgia LLC for the Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia and the Asian Development Bank. This social monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank AP – affected persons DC – Design Consultant DEPP - Department of Environmental protection and Permit ES/ SES - Environmental Specialist/ Senior Environmental Specialist GoG- Government of Georgia GRC - Grievance Redress Committee GRM - Grievance Redress Mechanism IPMO - Investment Program Management Office USIIP - Urban Sector Improvement Investment Program IA - Implementing Agency EA – Executing Agency IP – Indigenous People IR – Involuntary Resettlement LARP – Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan MoEPA - Ministry of Environment Protection and Agriculture MoRDI – Ministry of Regional Development & Infrastructure
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia: Floods
    Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Georgia: Floods DREF Operation MDRGE010 Glide n° FL-2015-000071-GEO Date of issue: 23 June 2015 Expected timeframe: 20 June – 20 September 2015 (3 months) DREF allocated: CHF 281,483 Operation manager (responsible for this EPoA): Point of contact: Ekaterine Kristesashvili Kakhaber Mamuladze Head of IFRC Representation Office in Georgia Georgia Red Cross Society phone: +995 599 145717 email: [email protected] Head of Disaster Management Department phone:+995577230026; email: [email protected] Number of people affected: 10,320 Number of people to be assisted: 2,800 and 1,120 beneficiaries, in total 3,920 people Host National Society presence: Georgia Red Cross Society with 30 staff and 240 volunteers from local branches. A. Situation analysis Description of the disaster On 7 June 2015 heavy rains and hails caused flooding in the eastern part of Georgia.1 Basements and first floors of the houses were seriously flooded. Belongings of the people were damaged or lost. The rains flooded yards and agricultural lands, leaving some of the affected population without main source of income. Fruit trees and vegetable gardens were also damaged. Many roads were destroyed; it became difficult for the people to get home to their villages. A lot of cattle and poultry were killed. Heavy winds, which followed the rain, unroofed several houses in Lagodekhi Municipality. Electricity lines were damaged. According to the rapid assessment conducted by Georgia Red Cross Society (GRCS) volunteers together with local authorities, 2,200 2 GRCS volunteers helping in the cleaning of the affected areas in households (8,800 people) are affected by the Tbilisi.
    [Show full text]