<<

Ex Ante President Schwarzenegger – Or At Least Hughes?

ver 35 million californians are now born in Austria or Canada as President? On governed by the Terminator – yet 250 the other hand, it was precisely the fear of O million other Americans will never have Austria (and Prussia and Russia, too) that that pleasure. Presidential aspirations are motivated the Founders. Those powers had similarly dashed for Michigan Governor but just rigged the election of their own candidate Canadian-born Jennifer Granholm, Labor as the new monarch of Poland, in order to Secretary Elaine Chao, two former secretaries divide that nation’s territory among themselves. of state, and about ten million other There’s an even stronger argument, how- Americans. That’s because Article II of the ever, for amending the natural born citizen U.S. Constitution provides that “[n]o Person requirement: At a minimum, anyone who has except a natural born Citizen … shall be been an American throughout his entire life should eligible to the Office of President.” be eligible to become President. Yet the The conventional argument for repealing Constitution arguably excludes from Presiden- the natural born citizen requirement is tial eligibility persons born to U.S. citizens, straightforward: It’s unfair, even un-American, and thus born as Americans, but born abroad. to create a second class of citizens who are Many academics, to be sure, argue that ineligible to serve as President. Throughout such persons are eligible. Nevertheless, these history, there have been numerous efforts to two million Americans fall under a substantial repeal the requirement – including one as legal cloud. In v. Wong Kim Ark, early as 1868 and two in the current Congress 169 U.S. 649 (1898), the U.S. Supreme Court (H. Res. 269, 40th Cong.; S. 284, 41st Cong.; explained that the natural born citizen clause H. Res. 52, 42nd Cong.; H.J. Res. 259, 80th “was used in reference to that principle of Cong.; H.J. Res. 28, 81st Cong.; H.J. Res. 795, public law, well understood in this country at 90th Cong.; S.J. Res. 161, 92nd Cong.; S.J. Res. the time of the adoption of the Constitution, 72, 98th Cong.; H.J. Res. 229, 100th Cong.; which referred citizenship to the place of H.J. Res. 450, 101st Cong.; H.J. Res. 88, 106th birth” (quoting Justice Curtis’s dissent in Dred Cong.; H.J. Res. 47, 107th Cong.; H.J. Res. 59, Scott). See also United States ex rel. Guest v. 108th Cong.; S.J. Res. 15, 108th Cong.). Perkins, 17 F. Supp. 177 (D.D.C. 1936). The Founders, however, were concerned Eight proposals have been introduced to about . In a July 25, 1787 letter extend eligibility to lifelong Americans born to George Washington, who was then serving abroad to U.S. citizens – and in particular, to as President of the Constitutional Convention, U.S. servicemen (H.J. Res. 645, 84th Cong.; John Jay wrote: “Permit me to hint, whether it H.J. Res. 80, 85th Cong.; H.J. Res. 612, 85th would not be wise seasonable to provide a Cong.; H.J. Res. 205, 86th Cong.; H.J. Res. 214, strong check to the admission of Foreigners 86th Cong.; H.J. Res. 517, 86th Cong.; H.J. Res. into the administration of our national 571, 87th Cong.; H.J. Res. 397, 88th Cong.). Government; and to declare expressly that the Surely, the sons and daughters of our soldiers Command in chief of the american army shall should be able to run for President. As First not be given to, nor devolve on, any but a Lady Laura recently pointed out in natural born Citizen.” support of repeal, “even The Founders’ concerns may seem obsolete [daughter of a U.S. serviceman] was born in to some today. And why shouldn’t the Ameri- . Karen Hughes for President.” can people have the option to elect a governor – James C. Ho

108 7 Green Bag 2d 105