DOCSLIB.ORG

November 2007 EVALUATING ONLINE CARBON CALCULATORS INSIDE THIS ISSUE by Daniel A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
November 2007 EVALUATING ONLINE CARBON CALCULATORS INSIDE THIS ISSUE by Daniel A THE W AGNER P LANNER Newsletter of the NYU Urban Planning Student Association November 2007 EVALUATING ONLINE CARBON CALCULATORS INSIDE THIS ISSUE by Daniel A. Doyle (MUP ‘08) generally lead these footprints to shrink and swell in tandem. How- Online Carbon Calculators ur planet’s resources float ever, there are exceptions. Should by Daniel A. Doyle p. 1 some mighty privileged life- we use cleaner fuels to raze a for- O styles. Regrettably, policies est, our ecological footprint could City of Water Review of unchecked plunder for short- conceivably balloon while its car- by Michael Freedman-Schnapp, p. 3 term gain make for a bleak future. bon counterpart remains largely Arming citizens with a tool for self- unchanged. These analyses have Interview with Prof. Ingrid Ellen examination is a virtuous effort some notable overlap, yet we by Sarah Wu, p. 4 since we can’t manage what we would be remiss to use them inter- don’t measure. It’s no small task changeably. to measure environmental impacts Urban World Population Growth by Michael Kodransky, p. 5 such as carbon dioxide emissions, When I tried three carbon calcula- but numerous carbon calculators tors online to tally my own carbon are emerging on the internet as an yield, I was hoping for a hard and Planner Poll easily accessible re- fast baseline. Instead, Results, p 6 source to make this “Online carbon I found my pounds of feasible. calculator sites CO2 emitted annually Economic Reform in Vietnam varied widely. The by Theresa B. Do, p. 7 often generate more The hope is that our EPA’s (U.S. Environ- choices and their ef- questions than mental Protection Grassroots Work in Sunset Park fects on the planet answers.” Agency) calculator by Ben Winter, p. 8-9 become more trans- estimated that my ac- parent. One is anointed with a tions accounted for upwards of Urban Design Class Poster Session “carbon footprint” by answering 33,000 pounds of CO2 annually, Compiled by Michael Kodransky just a few questions about driving while Nature Conservancy had my and Theresa B. Do, p. 10 habits, energy bills and frequent actions producing under 22,000 UPSA Scholarship flyer miles. Yet it should not be pounds. by Yvonne Martinez, p. 11 confused with an “ecological foot- print.” They differ in that an eco- A third calculator, found on cli- logical scorecard tracks an individ- matecrisis.net, generated a number ual’s natural resource use against that was less than half of the EPA’s the earth’s ability to regenerate figure. The wide range of results these materials. can be attributed partially to dif- ferent information requested by Carbon scores estimate the amount each calculator. Nature Conser- of CO2 emissions released from our vancy, for instance, did not ask for material lives. Conventional meth- heating/electricity costs. ods of generating electricity would (Continued on pg. 6) Urban Planning Anytime at: http://www.nyu.edu/wagner/urbanplanning Urban Planning Program Robert F. Wagner School of Public Service New York University 295 Lafayette Street New York, NY 10012 THE W AGNER P LANNER NOVEMBER 2007 2 THE W AGNER P LANNER http://www.nyu.edu/wagner/ A LETTER FROM THE EDITORS urbanplanning Two development paradigms discussed in many planning conversations is Volume 4, Issue 1 about which approach works better: top-down or bottom-up. Grassroots November 2007 organizations rallying communities to understand the stakes at hand have one perception, while governments that unveil their ambitious vision for CHIEF EDITORS Michael Kodransky change have another. Ultimately, the needs of constituents should be at Theresa B. Do the core of any discourse. Buildings, roads and other infrastructure exist for people and not the other way around. CONTRIBUTING EDITOR The NYC Comprehensive Waterfront Plan developed under Mayor David Yvonne Martinez Dinkins in 1992 aimed to guide and stimulate different uses along the city’s edge. Mostly, it was a top-down plan to get derelict lots on the waterfront redeveloped. Portions of the 578 miles of NYC waterfront have already COPY EDITORS been transformed into new neighborhoods like Battery Park City. Others, Denali Dasgupta Melanie Ochser like the cluster of towers envisioned for Greenpoint-Williamsburg in Brook- Courtney Wolf lyn, have yet to be fully completed. Unlike Battery Park City, which was developed on landfill from the World PHOTOGRAPHY Trade Center site, the plans in Brooklyn are in an existing community with Emre Edev many diverse stakeholders. Other neighborhoods in Brooklyn, such as Sun- Sherilyn Tran set Park, are already organizing before any plans have even been con- Danise Malqui ceived. SPAN, a grassroots organization, tries to engage the numerous groups that call the neighborhood home to understand how potential CONTRIBUTING WRITERS changes might affect them. Daniel A. Doyle Michael Freedman-Schnapp These particular scenarios are not unique to NYC. In other municipalities Ben Winter and countries around the world, communities are dealing with government Sarah Wu visions for revitalization and growth. In Vietnam, enhancement of infra- structure to accommodate an increasing population is being done by de- centralizing some of dense development in core cities through improve- ments in the transportation network. The Wagner Planner is the independ- ent student newsletter of the Urban The introductory urban design course taught by Professor John Fontillas Planning Student Association (UPSA) of the Robert F. Wagner Graduate and Steve Stainbrook is one place where students at Wagner are chal- School of Public Service at NYU. lenged to think about top-down and bottom-up. Physical plans can be im- posed on a community from blueprints put together by a professional de- All currently enrolled MUP students, sign team or through interaction with community members at charrettes. alumni and faculty are encouraged to submit material to The Wagner We hope you enjoy the articles in this issue of The Wagner Planner that Planner. Please email letters to the deal with some of these themes and many more. editors and any other contributions to: [email protected] Michael Kodransky and Theresa B. Do THE W AGNER P LANNER NOVEMBER 2007 3 REVIEW OF DOCUMENTARY FILM ON WATERFRONT ISSUES IN NYC by Michael Freedman-Schnapp (MUP ‘09) small, semi-accessible bor) counter Doctoroff point by strips of parkland for point. They eloquently state that the here is a renaissance of sorts the public. well-paying jobs at the ports, fuel happening on New York har- depots, ship repair facilities and wa- T bor’s waterfront. Since the In the film, Philip Lopate, author of terfront factories support tens of early 20th century, when trains and the 2004 book Waterfront: A Journey thousands of blue-collar families automobiles replaced passenger fer- Around Manhattan, calls this new throughout New York City. Although ries, commercial use has dominated paradigm for the city’s edge a these facilities continue to undergird New York City’s waterfront. Now, “weird tradeoff” that brings no “real the region’s economy, they face im- in the wake of massive investments interaction between the waterfront minent displacement from residen- in New Jersey’s container terminals and the streets that abut it… taking tial, big-box retail and hotel devel- shifting the vitality of the commer- out all the street life.” opments. cial port to the west, a motley of recreation-seekers, environmental- New York City Deputy Mayor for Eco- Doctoroff’s vision for a gleaming ists, developers and “harbor district” con- politicians have turned trasts with that of an- their eyes towards the other member of the waterfront as a key re- Bloomberg administra- source for the area’s tion in the film, New growth. York City's Director of Long-Term Planning and The most visible part of Sustainability, Rohit this rediscovery of the Aggarwala. Emphasizing water’s edge is the pri- the need to keep sew- vate residential devel- age out of the harbor, opments rising all along create green roofs, and the harbor—from mod- adopt sustainable wa- ernist towers going up in terborne transit, Aggar- Williamsburg, Brooklyn wala seems to be sing- to faux-Swiss chalet ing from a different style condos sprouting in hymnal. City of Water Jersey City. Yet in the shows the contradiction shadows of these build- of Bloomberg’s develop- ings are new parks, waterside bicycle nomic Development, Daniel L. Doc- ment and sustainability plans by the trails, intrepid recreational boaters toroff, appears in City of Water as juxtaposition of these two admini- and a still-essential working water- the voice of the city planners, politi- stration officials—though the admini- front of tugs, barges and fuel depots. cians, developers, real estate inter- stration would insist they are one Between these forces that meet at ests and construction trades that are and the same. the high tide line lies a complex and responsible for bland riverside devel- rapidly-changing debate. opments like Queens West in Long Prominent in the film are numerous Island City and Newport, a master- local advocates who steadily bring City of Water, a 30-minute film di- planned “mixed-use” community in more people onto the water in row- rected by Loren Talbot of the Metro- Jersey City. Saying that the working boats, sailboats, water taxis and politan Waterfront Alliance and Jas- waterfront should be kept in areas even for competitive swims in the per Goldman of the Municipal Arts only “where it makes financial and Hudson River. City of Water makes a Society, explores the fissures of this spatial sense,” Doctoroff creates an convincing case for linking water ac- debate and lands squarely in the aura of inevitability for this type of cess, recreation and improvement of camp of promoting recreational op- development.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 5.1: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy A. INTRODUCTION
    Chapter 5.1: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy A. INTRODUCTION This chapter describes existing land use, zoning, and public policies applicable to the proposed project and evaluates potential significant adverse effects that may result from implementation of the proposed flood protection system. Potential significant adverse effects to land use as a result of implementing the flood protection system are also evaluated. Potential land use issues include known or likely changes in current land uses within the study area, as well as the proposed project’s potential effect on existing and future land use patterns. Potential zoning and public policy issues include the compatibility of the proposed project with existing zoning and consistency with existing applicable public policies. PROJECT AREA ONE Project Area One extends from Montgomery Street on the south to the north end of John V. Lindsay East River Park (East River Park) at about East 13th Street. Project Area One consists primarily of the Franklin Delano Roosevelt East River Drive (FDR Drive) right-of-way, a portion of Pier 42 and Corlears Hook Park as well as East River Park. The majority of Project Area One is within East River Park and includes four existing pedestrian bridges across the FDR Drive to East River Park (Corlears Hook, Delancey Street, East 6th Street, and East 10th Street Bridges) and the East Houston Street overpass. Project Area One is located within Manhattan Community District 3, and borders portions of the Lower East Side and East Village neighborhoods. PROJECT AREA TWO Project Area Two extends north and east from Project Area One, from East 13th Street to East 25th Street.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Annual Report
    Board of Directors The New York Cares Board of Directors are dedicated professionals who bring a wealth of public and private sector experience and are committed to driving community impact through volunteerism. President Board Members Paul J. Taubman James L. Amine, Head of Private Credit Chairman and CEO, PJT Partners Opportunities, Credit Suisse Rene Brinkley, Brand Marketing Manager, CNBC 2018 Vice President Audrey Choi, Chief Marketing Officer and Chief Kathy Behrens Sustainability Officer, Morgan Stanley Annual President, Social Responsibility and Player K. Don Cornwell, Partner, PJT Partners Programs, National Basketball Association Joyce Frost, Partner, Riverside Risk Advisors LLC Report Vice President Gail B. Harris, President Emeritus, John B. Ehrenkranz Board Director and Investor Chief Investment Officer, Julie Turaj Ehrenkranz Partners L.P. Robert Walsh, Chief Financial Officer, Evercore Partners Janet Zagorin, Principal, Opal Strategy LLC Vice President Adam Zotkow, Partner, Goldman Sachs Michael Graham Senior Managing Director & Country Honorary Board Members Head - USA, OMERS Private Equity USA Edward Adler, Partner, RLM Finsbury Richard Bilotti, Head of Technology, Media, Secretary and Telecommunications Research, Keith A. Grossman P. Schoenfeld Asset Management President, TIME Cheryl Cohen Effron Ken Giddon, President, Rothman’s We Co-Treasurer Union Square Neil K. Dhar Partner, Head of Financial Services, Sheldon Hirshon, ESQ, SIH PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP Enterprises, a Division of MC Acquisitions LLC Co-Treasurer Robert Levitan, Chief Executive Jeanne Straus Officer, Pando Networks, Inc. President, Straus News, Our Town, West David Rabin, Partner, The Lambs Side Spirit, Our Town Downtown Club and Double Seven Michael Schlein, President and believe CEO, Accion International Rising Leaders Council The Rising Leaders Council is a group of 40 young professionals who spearhead volunteer projects and raise funds in support of New York Cares.
    [Show full text]
  • East Side Coastal Resiliency
    East Side Coastal Resiliency SANDRESM2 Construction Update Waterside & Stuyvesant Town Tenant Association Virtual Meeting March 31, 2021 AGENDA • Welcoming Remarks • ESCR Overview • Community Advisory Group (CAG) • Overview & Timeline • Traffic & Pedestrians • Communications • Questions? 22 EAST SIDE COASTAL RESILIENCY GRAPHIC FROM ESCR PDC PRESENTATION 2019/2020 3 PARTNERS The project team is led by the NYC Department of Design and Construction (DDC), the Mayor's Office of Resiliency (MOR), and the Department of Parks and Recreation (Parks). Other agency partners include the Department of Transportation (DOT), the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), the Department of City Planning (DCP); and the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC). DDC, through a competitive procurement process selected the HNTB-LiRo JointGRAPHIC Venture FROM as ESCR the PDC Program Management/Construction Management Consultant for the CoastalPRESENTATION Resiliency Program 2019/2020. Community Construction Liaison (CCL) – Nadine Harris [email protected] 4 PROJECT AREA OVERVIEW ASSER LEVY PLAYGROUND SOLAR ONE AREA 5 COMMUNITY ADVISORY GROUP (CAG) Community Advisory Group Pratt Independent community-based entity serving Independent facilitator for the Community in an advisory role to the project team Advisory Group during the ESCR construction during the ESCR construction phase. phase. • Monitor City’s commitments • Facilitate CAG guidelines and meetings • Collaborate & problem-solve construction impacts • Serve as a point of contact between
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Annual Report
    2020 Annual Report New York Cares newyorkcares.org Photo: Mark Seliger newyorkcares.org 2020 Annual Report Uncertainty is something that should be embraced not with fear, but with action. Shanique Martin Team Leader newyorkcares.org 2020 Annual Report Inside the Report Message From Our Leaders 7 Responding to COVID-19 8 A Historic Year 12 Collective Impact 16 Equity Through Service 19 Community-Focused 20 Addressing Food Insecurity 22 Educating Virtually 26 Connecting with Isolated New Yorkers 30 Annual Events Reimagined 36 Mark Seliger Raises Funds for COVID Relief 41 In the News 44 Making It All Possible 46 Rising Up 48 Leadership Cares 50 2020 Financial Statement 54 Financial Supporters 56 Partners in a Pandemic 62 In Memory of Arthur Fisher October 21, 1940–March 31, 2021 This report is dedicated to our devoted and beloved volunteer, Arthur Fisher. arrow-up-circle Sadly, Arthur passed away peacefully just as we put the finishing touches on his Volunteer loading produce into van for tribute (page 41). Arthur exemplified a true New Yorker—tough on the outside delivery at Golden Harvest Food Pantry. with a heart of gold on the inside. Photo: Yuxi Liu. 5 newyorkcares.org 2020 Annual Report Message From Our Leaders New Yorkers are In 2020, New York Cares rallied thousands of New Yorkers to roll up their sleeves and renowned for being address the unprecedented needs of communities whose health and viability were tough, but also kind fundamentally threatened—all while confronting painful truths about persistent and pervasive injustice and inequity in our society. and compassionate. Those qualities When our city was shutting down, of resilience and New York Cares was ramping up.
    [Show full text]
  • PERSPECTIVE 2019 PROGRAM REPORT Office: 212.505.6050 Email: [email protected] Web
    PERSPECTIVE 2019 PROGRAM REPORT Office: 212.505.6050 Email: [email protected] Web: www.solar1.org Solar One - Administrative Office 37 West 26th Street, Suite 209 New York, NY 10010 Solar One - Stuyvesant Cove Park 24-20 FDR Drive Service Road East New York, NY 10010 Solar One - Green Workforce Training Lab 29-76 Northern Blvd. Long Island City, NY 11101 Solar One is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization whose mission is to design and deliver innovative education, training, and technical assistance that fosters sustainability and resiliency in diverse urban environments. We empower learning that changes the way people think about energy, sustainability, and resilience by engaging and educating a diverse set of stakeholders and beneficiaries. Our programs help individuals and communities explore new ways of living and working that are more adaptive to a changing world. Table of Contents Introduction01 Director’s Letter .....................................................4 By the Numbers .....................................................6 Programs Workforce ..............................................................7 Here Comes Solar ...............................................11 Green Design Lab ...............................................15 Stuyvesant Cove Park .........................................19 Events .................................................................23 Energy Connections ............................................26 People Board and Staff ....................................................29 Major
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5.10 – Neighborhood Character
    Chapter 5.10: Neighborhood Character A. INTRODUCTION This chapter considers the effects of the proposed project on neighborhood character. As defined in the 2014 City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR) Technical Manual, neighborhood character is an amalgam of various elements that give neighborhoods their distinct “personality.” These elements may include a neighborhood’s land use, socioeconomic conditions, open space, historic and cultural resources, urban design and visual resources, shadows, transportation, and/or noise. According to the CEQR Technical Manual, neighborhood character effects are rare, and it would be under unusual circumstances that, in the absence of an effect in any of the relevant technical areas, a combination of moderate effects to the neighborhood would result in an effect to neighborhood character. Moreover, a significant effect identified in one of the technical areas that contributes to a neighborhood’s character is not automatically equivalent to a significant effect on neighborhood character. Rather, it serves as an indication that neighborhood character may be significantly affected. This examination focuses on whether a defining feature of the neighborhood’s character may be significantly affected by the proposed project. Since many of the relevant components of neighborhood character are considered in other sections of this Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), this chapter has been coordinated with those analyses. STUDY AREA The neighborhood character study area (study area) mirrors the study area used for the socioeconomic analysis, shown on Figure 5.2-1. The northern boundary of the study area is East 34th Street between First Avenue and the East River. The western boundary of the study area is First Avenue between East 29th and East 34th Streets; Third Avenue between East 3rd and East 29th Streets; and Allen, Clinton, Norfolk, Essex, and Pike Streets between East 3rd Street and South Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Rebuilding with Resilience Lessons from the Rebuild by Design Competition After Hurricane Sandy
    New Meadowlands Meadowlands, NJ Hunts Point Lifelines South Bronx, NYC Resist, Delay, Store, Discharge Hoboken, NJ Living with the Bay Nassau County, NY The BIG U Lower East Side, NYC Rebuilding with Living Breakwaters Resilience Staten Island, NYC Lessons from the Rebuild by Design Competition After Hurricane Sandy Rebuilding with Resilience Lessons from the Rebuild by Design Competition After Hurricane Sandy AUTHORS Jessica Grannis, Adaptation Program Manager for the Georgetown Climate Center; with editorial, research, and writing support from Georgetown Climate Center colleagues including: Vicki Arroyo, Sara Hoverter, Matthew Goetz, Annie Bennett, Jamie DeWeese, Kathryn Zyla, and Melissa Deas. ©2016, Georgetown Climate Center Georgetown Law | 600 New Jersey Ave. NW | Washington, DC 20001 | 202.661.6566 | georgetownclimate.org Acknowledgements The authors would like to give special thanks to Amy Chester and Lynn Englum of Rebuild by Design on their assistance conceptualizing this report, coordinating comments with the grantees, and editorial input. The authors would also like to thank the staff of the New York State Governor’s Office of Storm Recovery, New York City Mayor’s Office of Recovery and Resilience, New Jersey Governor’s Office of Recovery and Rebuilding, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (Region II), and Henk Ovink (former Senior Advisor to the Secretary of HUD) and Scott Davis (Senior Advisor, Office of Community Planning and Development at HUD), who graciously spent time being interviewed and providing invaluable feedback on this report. Special thanks also to John Carey for his editorial assistance. Finally, this report would not have been possible without the support of our generous funders, and a visionary supporter of the Rebuild by Design Competition, the Rockefeller Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • MTA New York City Transit Canarsie Tunnel Project Supplemental Environmental Assessment
    MTA New York City Transit Canarsie Tunnel Project Supplemental Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Review July 2018 Prepared by MTA New York City Transit Prepared for Federal Transit Administration MTA New York City Transit Canarsie Tunnel Project Supplemental Environmental Assessment Abstract The Metropolitan Transportation Authority New York City Transit (MTA NYCT) proposes to implement a Alternative Services Plan (ASP), which will serve the L train ridership during a planned 15-month, full- time, double-track closure of the L train in Manhattan and between Brooklyn and Manhattan. The proposed ASP has been developed to provide transit and mobility options to L train riders to the greatest extent practicable during the temporary 15-month service suspension, balanced against the needs of residents in the vicinity of existing L train service and other users of the transportation network. MTA NYCT has conducted significant analysis and public outreach to inform the proposed ASP and has presented details of the proposed ASP to the affected communities in an iterative fashion as plans have been developed. The proposed ASP can be summarized as follows: Increased temporary alternative subway service during peak and off-peak hours New temporary bus routes, including one across 14th Street and four over the Williamsburg Bridge between Brooklyn and Manhattan New temporary ferry service between Williamsburg, Brooklyn and Stuyvesant Cove, Manhattan Station access and capacity improvements Additional temporary bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure
    [Show full text]
  • • on the Verge • Caring for New York City’S Emerging Waterfront Parks & Public Spaces
    Spring 2007 • On the Verge • Caring for New York City’s Emerging Waterfront Parks & Public Spaces •• Credits This report is the culmination of a year-long Elizabeth Ernish, Brooklyn Borough Hall Signe Nielsen, Mathews Nielsen series of meetings by a workgroup convened Meg Fellerath, Brooklyn Greenway Initiative Greg O’Connell, Pier 41 Associates by Regional Plan Association (RPA). Public Murray Fisher, New York Harbor School Todd Poole, Bay Area Economics park managers, conservancy representatives, Connie Fishman, Hudson River Park Trust Mike Pratt, Scherman Foundation non-profit parks advocates, developers, design professionals, and agency representatives Peter Fleischer, GIPEC (former) Mary Price, Partnerships for Parks came together to discuss management and Tom Fox, NY Water Taxi Milton Puryear, Brooklyn Greenway maintenance issues of waterfront parks and Lisa Garrison, Hudson River Foundation / Initiative public spaces citywide. The primary goal of New York City Environmental Fund Steven Ridler, New York State Coastal Zone these discussions was to learn from each other’s Amy Gavaris, New York Restoration Project Management experience and assess the opportunities and Marilyn Gelber, Independence Community David Rivel, City Parks Foundation limitations of different management models and funding streams. But out of these site-spe- Foundation KC Sahl, Van Cortlandt and Pelham Bay Park cific discussions, RPA has assembled essential Jasper Goldman, Metropolitan Waterfront Michael Samuelian, The Related background information and identified some Alliance Companies, LP specific city-wide policy recommendations that Tamara Greenfield, Partnerships for Parks Tracy Sayegh, Phillips Preiss Shapiro could help ensure that this new generation of Laura Hansen, JM Kaplan Fund (former) waterfront parks and public spaces meet the Bonnie Harken, Nautilus International Jason Schwartz, Partnerships for Parks promise of a revitalized waterfront.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultivating a Clean Energy Economy Solar One: 2009 Program Report Thank You to Our 2009 Major Contributors
    Cultivating a Clean Energy Economy Solar One: 2009 Program Report Thank You to Our 2009 Major Contributors Making our work possible * Neil Abromavage * Karen Ansis * Arup * Asian Americans for Equality * Alexander Auersperg * Cee Cee & Jeb Belford * Evi Blaikie * Bollinger, Inc. * Brookfield Properties * Mary Ann & William Campbell * Carol Higgins Clark * Peter M. Collins * Con Edison * Judy Gordon Cox * Credit Suisse * Crystal Window & Door Systems * Cutsogeorge Tooman & Allen Architects * Olga D’Alto * David Rockefeller Fund * Dr. Robert C. & Tina Sohn Foundation * Donna Walcavage Landscape Architecture * H. Hartley du Pont * EarthKind Energy * Donald Elliott * Connie & Rex Farr * Kristen & Stephen Fealy * FJC * Flack + Kurtz * Gillian Fuller * Fund for the Environment & Urban Life * Gelman Pension Consulting * Geoffrey Gund Foundation * Grenadier Realty * HANAC, Inc. * HDR-LMS * Helena Rubinstein Foundation * John Hennessey * Jane & Michael Hoffman * HSBC Bank USA, N.A. * Paula & Bill Hunnicutt * IBM * JAMA * Kellogg/Broadway Partners * Kiss & Cathcart * Stephanie Kreiger * Dennis & Camille LaBarre * Laborer Eastern Region Organizing Fund * Margo Langenberg * Vincent LaPaoula * Brendan Lentz * Lisa Nilsson Levin * Cynthia & Dan Lufkin * Jennifer Lynch & Edward Fitzgerald * Lili Lynton * Simone & Christopher Mailman * Rosaura Mendez * Mertz Gilmore Foundation * Mizuho Foundation * Valerie & Stuart Mogul * Monadnock Construction, Inc. * Philip Monaghan * Melissa & Chappy Morris * Motorola Foundation * Caroline Neimcyzk * NY City Council - Dan Garodnick * NY City Council - Manhattan Delegation * NY City Council - Parks & Recreation * NYC Economic Development Corporation * NYC Department of Cultural Affairs * NYS Assemblyman Brian Kavanagh * NYS Senator Tom Duane - Legislative Budget * NYSCA * NYSERDA * O’Connor, Davies, Munns & Dobbins * Francesca Olivieri * Pataki-Cahill Group * Maria & David Patterson * Pelli Clarke Pelli Architects * Planned Financial Programs * Bart Potenza * Evelyn & Michael Powers * Quality Metal Stamping * Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Development News Highlights MANHATTAN - MID-4TH QUARTER 2019 PLUS an OUTER BOROUGH SNAPSHOT Looking Ahead
    Development News Highlights MANHATTAN - MID-4TH QUARTER 2019 PLUS AN OUTER BOROUGH SNAPSHOT Looking Ahead NYC Sets Sight on Governors Island for Climate Change Lab Serving as the “latest example of local governments taking the lead on climate policy following President Trump’s decision in June 2017 to withdraw from the Paris Climate Accord, New York City has reportedly released a request for proposals (RFP) to contractors in consideration of what has been described as the creation of a “living laboratory” for coping with the effects of climate change on Governors Island. Although the idea is in very early stages, the proposal would transform a portion of the southern half of the 172-acre island, and serve as the “anchor” for the island’s development according to reported details within the RFP. New York City is currently facing the dilemma of rising demand for building along the water despite rising sea levels due to global warming. Governors Island offers an ideal location in New York Harbor off the tip of Lower Manhattan since it is particularly exposed to fl ooding and storm surge, thereby serving as a “visible representation” of what issues the New York, as a waterfront city, will be confronting by offering a “living laboratory” for climate adaption and education intended to provide New York City with the needed insight to deal with these issues in an urban context. The city has reportedly reached out to consultants to assist in creating a “pitch deck” selling the idea for distribution to foundations, universities or other possible partners, with the next step of soliciting bids from developers tentatively expected to begin by the end of next year.
    [Show full text]
  • One GREEN ENERGY, ARTS & EDUCATION CENTER 'J
    GREEN ENERGY, ARTS one & EDUCATION CENTER 'J m^*-' mm^^ EXHIBITS TO RESPONSE OF CEC STUYVESANT COVE, INC., ALSO KNOWN AS SOLAR ONE, TO THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION STAFF PROPOSAL FOR THE EXTENSION OF THE SYSTEMS BENEFIT CHARGE AND SBC FUNDED PUBLIC BENEFITS PROGRAM SUBMITTED OCTOBER 14, 2005 (Z?r"^n* GREEN ENERGY. ARTS v..•\_^ one & EDUCATION CENTER n EXHIBIT A 1 SOLAR ONE PROGRAM REPORT GREEN ENERGY. ARTS lone & EDUCATION CENTER >• -^iHSi-.-s,-• fv, • ••••<'. i gaiiH if^OGi/Wi KIPO[ST Scdar One's Education Program CEC Stuyvesant Cove, Inc. a/k/a Solar One1 has dedicated itself to inspiring New Yorkers to become environmentally responsible urban residents. It embraces this mission through environmental science education, access to sustainable arts performances, energy conservation using its own solar powered building as a prototype (Solar 1), and through other means to help New Yorkers develop a sense of stewardship for New York City, for themselves and for their own individual neighborhoods. What makes Solar One unique is that it • educates by providing hands on energy conservation and sustainability instruction through its own use of solar power and other resource saving techniques, • facilitates a better understanding of water ecology through its immediate access to and use of the East River estuary, • reinforces the importance of our natural environments through its preservation and maintenance of Stuyvesant Cove Park, a two acre park jewel located on the banks of the East River between 18* and 23rd Streets, and • gives the arts a place in promoting change and exemplifying a new direction in the positive use of energy and art.
    [Show full text]