• on the Verge • Caring for New York City’S Emerging Waterfront Parks & Public Spaces

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

• on the Verge • Caring for New York City’S Emerging Waterfront Parks & Public Spaces Spring 2007 • On the Verge • Caring for New York City’s Emerging Waterfront Parks & Public Spaces •• Credits This report is the culmination of a year-long Elizabeth Ernish, Brooklyn Borough Hall Signe Nielsen, Mathews Nielsen series of meetings by a workgroup convened Meg Fellerath, Brooklyn Greenway Initiative Greg O’Connell, Pier 41 Associates by Regional Plan Association (RPA). Public Murray Fisher, New York Harbor School Todd Poole, Bay Area Economics park managers, conservancy representatives, Connie Fishman, Hudson River Park Trust Mike Pratt, Scherman Foundation non-profit parks advocates, developers, design professionals, and agency representatives Peter Fleischer, GIPEC (former) Mary Price, Partnerships for Parks came together to discuss management and Tom Fox, NY Water Taxi Milton Puryear, Brooklyn Greenway maintenance issues of waterfront parks and Lisa Garrison, Hudson River Foundation / Initiative public spaces citywide. The primary goal of New York City Environmental Fund Steven Ridler, New York State Coastal Zone these discussions was to learn from each other’s Amy Gavaris, New York Restoration Project Management experience and assess the opportunities and Marilyn Gelber, Independence Community David Rivel, City Parks Foundation limitations of different management models and funding streams. But out of these site-spe- Foundation KC Sahl, Van Cortlandt and Pelham Bay Park cific discussions, RPA has assembled essential Jasper Goldman, Metropolitan Waterfront Michael Samuelian, The Related background information and identified some Alliance Companies, LP specific city-wide policy recommendations that Tamara Greenfield, Partnerships for Parks Tracy Sayegh, Phillips Preiss Shapiro could help ensure that this new generation of Laura Hansen, JM Kaplan Fund (former) waterfront parks and public spaces meet the Bonnie Harken, Nautilus International Jason Schwartz, Partnerships for Parks promise of a revitalized waterfront. The work group meetings and this report were supported Nate Harris, Partnerships for Parks Paul Seck, Michael Van Valkenberg through the leadership and generosity of the Clay Hiles, Hudson River Foundation / New Associates J.M. Kaplan Fund. Additional support was York City Environmental Fund John Shapiro, Phillips Preiss Shapiro provided by the New York State Department Steve Hindy, Brooklyn Brewery Claude Shostal, Brooklyn Bridge Park of State with funds provided under Title 11 Ron Hine, Fund for Better Waterfront Conservancy of the Environmental Protection Funds. The Jennifer Hoppa, NYC Dept. of Parks and Michael Slattery, meetings were graciously hosted by the Hudson Real Estate Board of River Foundation. While RPA has greatly Recreation New York benefited from the discussions and insight of Tessa Huxley, Battery Parks City Parks David Snetman, Transportation Alternatives the members of the work group, the report’s Conservancy Andy Stone, Trust for Public Land recommendations and any errors or omissions Pat Jenny, New York Community Trust Dennis Suszkowski, Hudson River are our own. Many thanks to the members of Keith Kerman, NYC Dept. of Parks and Foundation / New York City the workgroup: Recreation Environmental Fund Marcie Kesner, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Matthew Urbanski, Michael Van Colleen Alderson, NYC Department of Frankel LLP Valkenberg Associates Parks and Recreation Hilary Kitasei, Henry Hudson Joe Vance, Joe Vance Architects Jeff Baker, New York City Council Parkway Task Force Carol VanGuilder, Real Estate Board of Committee on Waterfronts Ajamu Kitwana, Youth Ministries for New York Bob Balder, Gensler Peace and Justice Donna Walcavage, Donna Walcavage Micaela Birmingham, New Yorkers Alyssa Konon, NYC Economic Development Landscape Architecture + Urban Design for Parks Corporation Meg Walker, Project for Public Spaces Michael Bradley, Riverside South Marianna Koval, Brooklyn Bridge Park Bethany Wall, Riverside Park Fund Development Corporation Conservancy Jae Watkins, UPROSE Alex Brash, National Parks Ruth Kuhlmann, Greenacre Foundation Nancy Welsh, NYSDOS Division of Conseravtion Association Erik Kulleseid, Trust for Public Land Coastal Resources Al Butzel, Friends of Hudson River Park (former) Stephen Whitehouse, Starr Whitehouse Joan Byron, Pratt Center for Andrea Kussack, Mertz Gilmore Toya Wiliford, Independence Community Community Development Foundation Foundation Don Capoccia, BFC Partners Joshua Laird, NYC Dept. of Parks and Craig Wilson, The New York League of Majora Carter, Sustainable South Bronx Recreation Conservation Voters Betty Chen, GIPEC Robert Levine, RAL Design Associates Wilbur Woods, New York City Helen Chin, West Harlem Spencer Levine, RAL Design Associates Department of City Planning Environmental Action, Inc. (former) Paula Luria Caplan, Bronx Borough Elizabeth Yeampierre, UPROSE Kate Collignon, NYC Economic President’s Office Nioka Young, New York Community Trust Development Corporation Stephen Marks, Hudson County Division (former) Chris Collins, Solar One of Planning Linda Cox, Bronx River Alliance Timothy Marshall, ETM Associates, LLC The report was written by Robert Freudenberg Carter Craft, Metropolitan Kim Mathews, Mathews Nielsen and Robert Pirani with the assistance of Waterfront Alliance Emily Maxwell, Partnerships for Parks Nicolas Ronderos, Cara Griffin and Jennifer Curtis Cravens, New York State Vince McGowan, Battery Park City Parks Cox of the RPA staff and a series of research as- Department of State/Brownfields Conservancy sociates: Joy Sinderbrand, Manami Kamikawa, Angela D’Aiuto, North Shore Waterfront Massiel Medina Ferrara, Hudson County Bonnie Hulkower, and Victor Torres. Special Conservancy of Staten Island Division of Planning assistance on the waterfront parks inventory Candace Damon, Hamilton Rabinovitz Kimberly Miller, Municipal Arts Society was provided by Carter Craft and Loren Talbot Alschuler, Inc. (former) (former) from Metropolitan Waterfront Julia Day, Project for Public Spaces Menaka Mohan, Sustainable South Bronx Alliance. Carmen Diaz, Audubon Partnership for Nicholas Molinari, NYC Department of Economic Development LDC Parks and Recreation Noreen Doyle, Hudson River Park Trust Catherine Nagel, City Parks Alliance Report designed by Jeff Ferzoco, RPA Contents 2 Introduction 3 Summary of Recommendations 4 City-wide Context 8 Waterfront Park and Public Space Management Issues 10 Current Management Funding Models 16 Recommendations 21 Appendix Section One Introduction New York City is in the midst of one of the greatest level this playing field but, not surprisingly, the most lucrative partnership opportunities are in expansions of parks and public spaces in its history. neighborhoods with greater financial resources. Taken to its extreme, this can be seen as leading From large regional parks to neighborhood street 1990s. New York City was recently ranked 21st to a “two tier” system of parks: those with private ends to pedestrian-friendly greenways, the cur- among major US cities on operations expenditures resources and those without. rent waterfront revival will likely be remembered per capita by the Trust for Public Land.2 While Parks Moreover, many of these new generation as a time on par with the great park movements of & Recreation has received additional and significant waterfront public spaces are not conceived of the 1860s, 1930s and 1960s. operating funds recently3, organizations such as New as traditional parks and may not be managed There are close to 700 acres of waterfront Yorkers for Parks and others have argued that the by Parks & Recreation. Some public spaces are parks and public spaces in more than 50 projects current budget does not allow the agency to meet its associated with public or private waterfront now being planned or under construction management goals. redevelopment; maintenance of these public throughout the City (over 2,800 acres when Given this shortfall, Parks & Recreation spaces will not be central to the organizational including Fresh Kills Park in Staten Island). has been directed to find additional, site-specific mission of the public or private landowner. The Nearly 60 miles of waterfront access is being resources to support existing and new waterfront new waterfront greenways - key links in the new added through parks, greenways and esplanades.1 management responsibilities. Parks departments waterfront park system - cross multiple property This extraordinary legacy is fueled by have long sought revenues from private concessions, lines. Managing this wonderful connectivity falls available properties, a robust real estate cycle, permits, and philanthropy to help fill funding gaps largely on the City Department of Transporta- and the desire of the public and elected leaders to at existing parks. But today’s new parks seem to be tion (NYC DOT), which has traditionally been reclaim access to the harbor. The City and State required, if not to pay for themselves, to at least to more concerned with moving vehicles than deserve enormous credit for pursing this agenda. have some associated revenue stream. Based on the pedestrians and bicyclists. Ensuring that these But, for every ambitious plan and initial capital average costs of currently operating and future City new breeds of waterfront public spaces have the investment,300000000 there is also the far less glamorous and State parks, new waterfront parks will require same permanence, public character, and vitality task of managing a new public space. around $135,000 an acre each year for management, associated with traditional parks is of concern.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 5.1: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy A. INTRODUCTION
    Chapter 5.1: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy A. INTRODUCTION This chapter describes existing land use, zoning, and public policies applicable to the proposed project and evaluates potential significant adverse effects that may result from implementation of the proposed flood protection system. Potential significant adverse effects to land use as a result of implementing the flood protection system are also evaluated. Potential land use issues include known or likely changes in current land uses within the study area, as well as the proposed project’s potential effect on existing and future land use patterns. Potential zoning and public policy issues include the compatibility of the proposed project with existing zoning and consistency with existing applicable public policies. PROJECT AREA ONE Project Area One extends from Montgomery Street on the south to the north end of John V. Lindsay East River Park (East River Park) at about East 13th Street. Project Area One consists primarily of the Franklin Delano Roosevelt East River Drive (FDR Drive) right-of-way, a portion of Pier 42 and Corlears Hook Park as well as East River Park. The majority of Project Area One is within East River Park and includes four existing pedestrian bridges across the FDR Drive to East River Park (Corlears Hook, Delancey Street, East 6th Street, and East 10th Street Bridges) and the East Houston Street overpass. Project Area One is located within Manhattan Community District 3, and borders portions of the Lower East Side and East Village neighborhoods. PROJECT AREA TWO Project Area Two extends north and east from Project Area One, from East 13th Street to East 25th Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment Vi Recycling, Waste Prevention and Composting
    ATTACHMENT VI RECYCLING, WASTE PREVENTION AND COMPOSTING TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 STATUS OF CURRENT PROGRAMS......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 WASTE PREVENTION PROGRAMS ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Overview .................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1.2 New York Stuff Exchange........................................................................................................................ 3 1.1.3 NY Wa$teMatch....................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1.4 Materials for the Arts................................................................................................................................5 1.1.5 Environmentally Preferable Purchasing.................................................................................................... 7 1.1.6 NYCWasteLe$$ Website.......................................................................................................................... 8 1.1.7 Special Waste and Household Hazardous Waste (HHW)......................................................................... 9 1.2 CURBSIDE RECYCLING PROGRAM ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Design + Construction Excellence
    > July 2007 Progress Report THE CITY OF NEW YORK DESIGN + CONSTRUCTION EXCELLENCE > July 2007 Progress Report THE CITY OF NEW YORK DESIGN + CONSTRUCTION EXCELLENCE INTRODUCTION Design + Construction Excellence project locations DESIGN + CONSTRUCTION EXCELLENCE JULY 2007 PROGRESS REPORT July 2007 Dear Friends: From the grand entrances of our public libraries to the great INTRODUCTION green expanse of our parkland and open spaces, no city is more defined by its urban design than New York. Three years ago, the Art Commission called for a multi-agency effort to change the paradigm of the public building process, and build the landmarks of tomorrow. Today, I am pleased to report that, under the leadership of the Department of Design and Construction, the Design + Construction Excellence (D+CE) initiative has seen its most successful year yet. Since our last report, the initiative has continued to elevate design and construction standards and helped to produce thoughtful, creative projects in every borough. The new Office of Emergency Management headquarters in Brooklyn and the Queens Botanical Garden have achieved top level Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification and stand as vivid examples of what we can accomplish with bold thinking, and a commitment to meeting the biggest challenges of our time. Adopting the spirit of PlaNYC—our vision for a greener, greater New York—the D+CE will continue to ensure that our metropolis remains habitable and hospitable as it continues to grow and evolve. Thank you to everyone involved in the initiative for the support and contributions that remain critical to our success. You continue to help us build a better future for all New Yorkers—the future we all deserve.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City Comprehensive Waterfront Plan
    NEW YORK CITY CoMPREHENSWE WATERFRONT PLAN Reclaiming the City's Edge For Public Discussion Summer 1992 DAVID N. DINKINS, Mayor City of New lVrk RICHARD L. SCHAFFER, Director Department of City Planning NYC DCP 92-27 NEW YORK CITY COMPREHENSIVE WATERFRONT PLAN CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMA RY 1 INTRODUCTION: SETTING THE COURSE 1 2 PLANNING FRA MEWORK 5 HISTORICAL CONTEXT 5 LEGAL CONTEXT 7 REGULATORY CONTEXT 10 3 THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 17 WATERFRONT RESOURCES AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE 17 Wetlands 18 Significant Coastal Habitats 21 Beaches and Coastal Erosion Areas 22 Water Quality 26 THE PLAN FOR THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 33 Citywide Strategy 33 Special Natural Waterfront Areas 35 4 THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 51 THE EXISTING PUBLIC WATERFRONT 52 THE ACCESSIBLE WATERFRONT: ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES 63 THE PLAN FOR THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 70 Regulatory Strategy 70 Public Access Opportunities 71 5 THE WORKING WATERFRONT 83 HISTORY 83 THE WORKING WATERFRONT TODAY 85 WORKING WATERFRONT ISSUES 101 THE PLAN FOR THE WORKING WATERFRONT 106 Designation Significant Maritime and Industrial Areas 107 JFK and LaGuardia Airport Areas 114 Citywide Strategy fo r the Wo rking Waterfront 115 6 THE REDEVELOPING WATER FRONT 119 THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT TODAY 119 THE IMPORTANCE OF REDEVELOPMENT 122 WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT ISSUES 125 REDEVELOPMENT CRITERIA 127 THE PLAN FOR THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT 128 7 WATER FRONT ZONING PROPOSAL 145 WATERFRONT AREA 146 ZONING LOTS 147 CALCULATING FLOOR AREA ON WATERFRONTAGE loTS 148 DEFINITION OF WATER DEPENDENT & WATERFRONT ENHANCING USES
    [Show full text]
  • NYC Park Crime Stats
    1st QTRPARK CRIME REPORT SEVEN MAJOR COMPLAINTS Report covering the period Between Jan 1, 2018 and Mar 31, 2018 GRAND LARCENY OF PARK BOROUGH SIZE (ACRES) CATEGORY Murder RAPE ROBBERY FELONY ASSAULT BURGLARY GRAND LARCENY TOTAL MOTOR VEHICLE PELHAM BAY PARK BRONX 2771.75 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 VAN CORTLANDT PARK BRONX 1146.43 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 01000 01 ROCKAWAY BEACH AND BOARDWALK QUEENS 1072.56 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00001 01 FRESHKILLS PARK STATEN ISLAND 913.32 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 FLUSHING MEADOWS CORONA PARK QUEENS 897.69 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 01002 03 LATOURETTE PARK & GOLF COURSE STATEN ISLAND 843.97 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 MARINE PARK BROOKLYN 798.00 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 BELT PARKWAY/SHORE PARKWAY BROOKLYN/QUEENS 760.43 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 BRONX PARK BRONX 718.37 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 01000 01 FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT BOARDWALK AND BEACH STATEN ISLAND 644.35 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00001 01 ALLEY POND PARK QUEENS 635.51 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 PROSPECT PARK BROOKLYN 526.25 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 04000 04 FOREST PARK QUEENS 506.86 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 GRAND CENTRAL PARKWAY QUEENS 460.16 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 FERRY POINT PARK BRONX 413.80 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 CONEY ISLAND BEACH & BOARDWALK BROOKLYN 399.20 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00001 01 CUNNINGHAM PARK QUEENS 358.00 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00001 01 RICHMOND PARKWAY STATEN ISLAND 350.98 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 CROSS ISLAND PARKWAY QUEENS 326.90 ONE ACRE OR LARGER 0 00000 00 GREAT KILLS PARK STATEN ISLAND 315.09 ONE ACRE
    [Show full text]
  • November 2007 EVALUATING ONLINE CARBON CALCULATORS INSIDE THIS ISSUE by Daniel A
    THE W AGNER P LANNER Newsletter of the NYU Urban Planning Student Association November 2007 EVALUATING ONLINE CARBON CALCULATORS INSIDE THIS ISSUE by Daniel A. Doyle (MUP ‘08) generally lead these footprints to shrink and swell in tandem. How- Online Carbon Calculators ur planet’s resources float ever, there are exceptions. Should by Daniel A. Doyle p. 1 some mighty privileged life- we use cleaner fuels to raze a for- O styles. Regrettably, policies est, our ecological footprint could City of Water Review of unchecked plunder for short- conceivably balloon while its car- by Michael Freedman-Schnapp, p. 3 term gain make for a bleak future. bon counterpart remains largely Arming citizens with a tool for self- unchanged. These analyses have Interview with Prof. Ingrid Ellen examination is a virtuous effort some notable overlap, yet we by Sarah Wu, p. 4 since we can’t manage what we would be remiss to use them inter- don’t measure. It’s no small task changeably. to measure environmental impacts Urban World Population Growth by Michael Kodransky, p. 5 such as carbon dioxide emissions, When I tried three carbon calcula- but numerous carbon calculators tors online to tally my own carbon are emerging on the internet as an yield, I was hoping for a hard and Planner Poll easily accessible re- fast baseline. Instead, Results, p 6 source to make this “Online carbon I found my pounds of feasible. calculator sites CO2 emitted annually Economic Reform in Vietnam varied widely. The by Theresa B. Do, p. 7 often generate more The hope is that our EPA’s (U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • HEP Habitat Status Report 2001.Pdf
    New York/New Jersey Harbor Estuary Program Habitat Workgroup ;1 regional partnership of federal, state, interstate, and local agencies, citizens, and scientists working together to protect and restore the habitat and living resources of the estuary, its tributaries, and the New York/Nc•F]ersey Bight City of New York/Parks & Recreation Natural Resources Group Rudolph W. Giuliani, Maym Henry J. Stem, Commissioner Marc A. Matsil, Chief, Natllfal Resources Group Chair, Habitat Workgroup, NY/NJ Harbor Estuary Program Status Report Sponsors National Pish and Wildlife Foundation City of New York/Parks & Recreation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection The Port Authority of New York & New Jersey City Parks Foundation HydroQual, Inc. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. Lawler, Matusky & Skelly Engineers, LLP This document is approved by the New York/New Jersey Harbor Estuary Prowam Policr Committee. The Policy Committee's membership includes the U.S. linvironmental Protection !lgency, U.S. ,lrmr Corps of!ingineers, New York State Department of nnvimnmental Conservation, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, New York Local Government Representative (New York C'i~1· Dep;~rtment of Enl'imnmentnl Protection), Newjcrsey lJ>enl Government Rcpresentati1·e (Newark V?atershed Conservation and De,·elopment Corporation), and a Rcprcsent;JtiFe of the Citizens/Scientific and Technical Advisory Committees. Funds for this project were pnwided through settlement funds from the National Pish and \Vildlif(: Foundation. April 2001 Cover: Blue mussels (Mytilus edulis). North Brother Island. Bronx Opposite: Pelham Bay Park, Bronx New York/New Jersey Harbor Estuary Program Habitat Workgroup 2001 Status Report Table of Contents 4 Introduction 8 Section 1: Acquisition and Restoration Priorities 9 I.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Annual Report
    Board of Directors The New York Cares Board of Directors are dedicated professionals who bring a wealth of public and private sector experience and are committed to driving community impact through volunteerism. President Board Members Paul J. Taubman James L. Amine, Head of Private Credit Chairman and CEO, PJT Partners Opportunities, Credit Suisse Rene Brinkley, Brand Marketing Manager, CNBC 2018 Vice President Audrey Choi, Chief Marketing Officer and Chief Kathy Behrens Sustainability Officer, Morgan Stanley Annual President, Social Responsibility and Player K. Don Cornwell, Partner, PJT Partners Programs, National Basketball Association Joyce Frost, Partner, Riverside Risk Advisors LLC Report Vice President Gail B. Harris, President Emeritus, John B. Ehrenkranz Board Director and Investor Chief Investment Officer, Julie Turaj Ehrenkranz Partners L.P. Robert Walsh, Chief Financial Officer, Evercore Partners Janet Zagorin, Principal, Opal Strategy LLC Vice President Adam Zotkow, Partner, Goldman Sachs Michael Graham Senior Managing Director & Country Honorary Board Members Head - USA, OMERS Private Equity USA Edward Adler, Partner, RLM Finsbury Richard Bilotti, Head of Technology, Media, Secretary and Telecommunications Research, Keith A. Grossman P. Schoenfeld Asset Management President, TIME Cheryl Cohen Effron Ken Giddon, President, Rothman’s We Co-Treasurer Union Square Neil K. Dhar Partner, Head of Financial Services, Sheldon Hirshon, ESQ, SIH PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP Enterprises, a Division of MC Acquisitions LLC Co-Treasurer Robert Levitan, Chief Executive Jeanne Straus Officer, Pando Networks, Inc. President, Straus News, Our Town, West David Rabin, Partner, The Lambs Side Spirit, Our Town Downtown Club and Double Seven Michael Schlein, President and believe CEO, Accion International Rising Leaders Council The Rising Leaders Council is a group of 40 young professionals who spearhead volunteer projects and raise funds in support of New York Cares.
    [Show full text]
  • East Side Coastal Resiliency
    East Side Coastal Resiliency SANDRESM2 Construction Update Waterside & Stuyvesant Town Tenant Association Virtual Meeting March 31, 2021 AGENDA • Welcoming Remarks • ESCR Overview • Community Advisory Group (CAG) • Overview & Timeline • Traffic & Pedestrians • Communications • Questions? 22 EAST SIDE COASTAL RESILIENCY GRAPHIC FROM ESCR PDC PRESENTATION 2019/2020 3 PARTNERS The project team is led by the NYC Department of Design and Construction (DDC), the Mayor's Office of Resiliency (MOR), and the Department of Parks and Recreation (Parks). Other agency partners include the Department of Transportation (DOT), the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), the Department of City Planning (DCP); and the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC). DDC, through a competitive procurement process selected the HNTB-LiRo JointGRAPHIC Venture FROM as ESCR the PDC Program Management/Construction Management Consultant for the CoastalPRESENTATION Resiliency Program 2019/2020. Community Construction Liaison (CCL) – Nadine Harris [email protected] 4 PROJECT AREA OVERVIEW ASSER LEVY PLAYGROUND SOLAR ONE AREA 5 COMMUNITY ADVISORY GROUP (CAG) Community Advisory Group Pratt Independent community-based entity serving Independent facilitator for the Community in an advisory role to the project team Advisory Group during the ESCR construction during the ESCR construction phase. phase. • Monitor City’s commitments • Facilitate CAG guidelines and meetings • Collaborate & problem-solve construction impacts • Serve as a point of contact between
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Annual Report
    2020 Annual Report New York Cares newyorkcares.org Photo: Mark Seliger newyorkcares.org 2020 Annual Report Uncertainty is something that should be embraced not with fear, but with action. Shanique Martin Team Leader newyorkcares.org 2020 Annual Report Inside the Report Message From Our Leaders 7 Responding to COVID-19 8 A Historic Year 12 Collective Impact 16 Equity Through Service 19 Community-Focused 20 Addressing Food Insecurity 22 Educating Virtually 26 Connecting with Isolated New Yorkers 30 Annual Events Reimagined 36 Mark Seliger Raises Funds for COVID Relief 41 In the News 44 Making It All Possible 46 Rising Up 48 Leadership Cares 50 2020 Financial Statement 54 Financial Supporters 56 Partners in a Pandemic 62 In Memory of Arthur Fisher October 21, 1940–March 31, 2021 This report is dedicated to our devoted and beloved volunteer, Arthur Fisher. arrow-up-circle Sadly, Arthur passed away peacefully just as we put the finishing touches on his Volunteer loading produce into van for tribute (page 41). Arthur exemplified a true New Yorker—tough on the outside delivery at Golden Harvest Food Pantry. with a heart of gold on the inside. Photo: Yuxi Liu. 5 newyorkcares.org 2020 Annual Report Message From Our Leaders New Yorkers are In 2020, New York Cares rallied thousands of New Yorkers to roll up their sleeves and renowned for being address the unprecedented needs of communities whose health and viability were tough, but also kind fundamentally threatened—all while confronting painful truths about persistent and pervasive injustice and inequity in our society. and compassionate. Those qualities When our city was shutting down, of resilience and New York Cares was ramping up.
    [Show full text]
  • Making the Most of Our Parks
    Making the Most of Our Parks RECREATION EXERCISE RESPITE PLAY ENSURING GREENER, SAFER, CLEANER PARKS, TOGETHER A SUMMARY OF A REPORT BY THE CITIZENS BUDGET COMMISSION AT THE REQUEST OF NEW YORKERS FOR PARKS NEW YORK’S NONPARTISAN VOICE SEPTEMBER 2007 FOR EFFECTIVE GOVERNMENT MAKING THE MOST OF OUR PARKS the challenge to new yorkers Parks play important roles in city life. They are a source of respite from the bustle of the urban environment, a place for active recreation and exercise for adults, and a safe place for children to play outdoors. In addition, parks preserve sensitive environmen- tal areas, and, by making neighborhoods more attractive, enhance property values and the tax base of the city. Given the benefits of urban parks, it should be reassuring to New Yorkers that more than 37,000 acres, or nearly one-fifth the city’s total land area, is parkland. This pro- portion is larger than in most big cities in the United States, suggesting that New Yorkers are well endowed with parks. But New Yorkers face a distinct challenge in enjoying their parks. Their parks must accommodate an unparalleled volume of people. New York has about 217 residents for each acre of parkland, one of the highest ratios in the nation, compared to a national average among large cities of about 55 residents per acre. When the extraordinarily large number of commuters and tourists is added to New York’s resident population, the potential demand on local parks likely is greater than in any other American city. New Yorkers must be especially innovative in order to make the most of their parks.
    [Show full text]
  • PERSPECTIVE 2019 PROGRAM REPORT Office: 212.505.6050 Email: [email protected] Web
    PERSPECTIVE 2019 PROGRAM REPORT Office: 212.505.6050 Email: [email protected] Web: www.solar1.org Solar One - Administrative Office 37 West 26th Street, Suite 209 New York, NY 10010 Solar One - Stuyvesant Cove Park 24-20 FDR Drive Service Road East New York, NY 10010 Solar One - Green Workforce Training Lab 29-76 Northern Blvd. Long Island City, NY 11101 Solar One is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization whose mission is to design and deliver innovative education, training, and technical assistance that fosters sustainability and resiliency in diverse urban environments. We empower learning that changes the way people think about energy, sustainability, and resilience by engaging and educating a diverse set of stakeholders and beneficiaries. Our programs help individuals and communities explore new ways of living and working that are more adaptive to a changing world. Table of Contents Introduction01 Director’s Letter .....................................................4 By the Numbers .....................................................6 Programs Workforce ..............................................................7 Here Comes Solar ...............................................11 Green Design Lab ...............................................15 Stuyvesant Cove Park .........................................19 Events .................................................................23 Energy Connections ............................................26 People Board and Staff ....................................................29 Major
    [Show full text]