Principles for Collective Humanitarian Intervention to Succor Other Countries' Imperiled Indigenous Nationals George K

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Principles for Collective Humanitarian Intervention to Succor Other Countries' Imperiled Indigenous Nationals George K American University International Law Review Volume 18 | Issue 1 Article 3 2002 Principles for Collective Humanitarian Intervention to Succor Other Countries' Imperiled Indigenous Nationals George K. Walker Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/auilr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Parker, Elizabeth Rindskopf. "Principles for Collective Humanitarian Intervention to Succor Other Countries' Imperiled Indigenous Nationals." American University International Law Review 18, no. 1 (2002): 35-162. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PRINCIPLES FOR COLLECTIVE HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION TO SUCCOR OTHER COUNTRIES' IMPERILED INDIGENOUS NATIONALS GEORGE K. WALKER* I. ST A T E O F N E C E S SIT Y ........................................................................................ 4 0 II. TH E PRO PO SED PRIN CIPLES ................................................................. 55 A . P R IO R S ITU A T IO N S......................................................................................... 5 5 B. STATE OF NECESSITY: OPPOSING PRINCIPLES AND P OL IC IES ....................................................................................................................... 6 6 C. ANALYSIS OF PRINCIPLES AND FACTORS GOVERNING STATE OF NECESSITY INTERVENTION ................................................ 70 1. Restating the Restatements' Principles........................................ 74 2. Refining the InternationalLaw Commission and the Restatements' Analyses for Collective Humanitarian Intervention Under State of Necessity ........................................... 78 a. Reasonable Knowledge and Information About a Crisis at the Tim e of D ecision .............................................. 79 b. Consensus D ecision M aking ................................................. 85 c. Seriousness of the Situation ................................................. 87 d. N ecessity and Proportionality .............................................. 91 * Professor of Law, Wake Forest University School of Law. B.A. 1959, University of Alabama; LL.B. 1966, Vanderbilt University; A.M. 1968, Duke University; LL.M. 1972, University of Virginia. Member, North Carolina, Virginia Bars. I delivered an early version of this Article as a paper at a Colloquium, Legal and Ethical Lessons of NATO's Kosovo Campaign, August 7-10, 2001, at the Naval War College, Newport, R.I.; parts of it will be published as a chapter in Legal and Ethical Lessons of NATO's Kosovo Campaign (Andru E. Wall, ed., Nav. War C. Int'l L. Stud., v. 78, 2002). My thanks to Howard K. Sinclair, Wake Forest University Worrell Professional Center Reference Librarian, who obtained sources and gave other research help; and to my colleague, Professor Charles P. Rose, Jr., for his thoughts. Errors are my responsibility. A School of Law grant supported research. © George K. Walker. AM. U. INT'L L. REV. [18:35 e. Situations Where International Law Forbids State of N ecessity Intervention ............................................................ 100 f. Self-defense and Other Actions by States in Collective Humanitarian Intervention Under State o f N e c e s sity .......................................................................................... 10 7 g. Notice to the Affected State and Others ........................... 110 h. Time for Completing Humanitarian Intervention U nder State of N ecessity ............................................................. 118 i. Reasonableness Factors Counseling For or Against Collective Intervention Under State of N e c e s s ity ................................................................................................. 1 19 i. L ink a g e ............................................................................................ 12 2 ii. Co n n e c tiv ity ................................................................................. 12 3 iii. Character,Importance, and Acceptance ................ 125 iv. Justified Exp ectations........................................................... 127 v. Importance to the InternationalCommunity ........ 130 vi. Consistency With Traditions of the InternationalSystem .............................................................. 13 1 vii. Interests of Other States and International O rga n izatio n s ............................................................................. 13 3 viii.An Obligation to Evaluate................................................. 136 D . E V A LU A T ION .......................................................................................................... 13 8 III. APPLICATION OF THE LOAC DURING ALLIED F O R C E ............................................................................................................................... 14 3 A. RELEVANCE OF GENERAL LOAC AND NEUTRALITY LAW TO A LL IE D F OR C E ............................................................................................... 14 4 B. NATO's RIGHT TO CONDUCT MARITIME INTERDICTION AS P A RT O F A LLIED F O RC E........................................................................... 14 7 1. NATO Naval Assets Available; Naval Operations Du ring A llied F o rce ................................................................................ 14 7 2. Proposed NATO Naval Interdiction During Allied F orce: A L awfid Op tion ........................................................................ 15 1 C. CAPTURED ARMED FORCES MEMBERS' ENTITLEMENT TO PRISONER OF WAR (PW) STATUS ............................................................ 153 1. NATO-SFRY Aspects of Allied Force......................................... 153 2. The SFR Y-KLA Aspects ofAllied Force................................... 157 IV . C O N C LU SIO N S ......................................................................................................... 16 0 2002] HUMANITARIAN INTER VENTION NATO's 1999 Operation Allied Force, organized to succor Albanian Kosovars and others (e.g., Roma) indigenous to the Kosovo province of the former Yugoslavia' ("SFRY") subjected to brutal actions-including murder, rape and displacement from their homes by Serbian forces under SFRY President Slobodan Milosevic's direction-was a legitimate collective action for humanitarian intervention pursuant to principles of state of necessity under circumstances known at the time.2 The law of international armed 1. See Ian Fisher, Serbia and Montenegro Sign a Plan for Yugoslavia's Demise, N.Y. TIMES, Mar. 15, 2002, at A3 (writing that there would be no "Yugoslavia" in the future if Serbia and Montenegro, the remnants of pre-1991 Yugoslavia, approved a March 14, 2002 agreement that declared that the area of the former Yugoslavia would be known as "Serbia and Montenegro"); see also Ian Fisher, Yugoslavia.- Restructuring Plan Advances, N.Y. TIMES, Apr. 10, 2002, at A14 (reporting that the Parliaments of Serbia and Montenegro formally approved the agreement). 2. What NATO knew, or reasonably should have known at the time of the decision to launch Allied Force, is important. See infra notes 114-134 and accompanying text (explaining that to be found liable for violating the rules of warfare, a decision-maker is judged on what he or she knew or should have known at the time the decision to attack was made); see also Ian Fisher & Marlise Simons, Defiant, Milosevic Begins His Defense by Assailing NATO, N.Y. TIMES, Feb. 15, 2002, at Al (writing that Milosevic raised the issue of the NATO campaign's lawfulness in his opening statement in his genocide and war crimes trial in The Hague); Milosevic, at U.N. Court, Trades Atrocity Charges with Kosovar, N.Y. TIMES, May 7, 2002, at A5 (reporting that Milosevic accused Kosovo Albanians of committing genocide against Serbians in the province, a claim Ibrahim Rugova, the Kosovo leader, denied). Milosevic's claims may be predicates for tu quoque ("you also") defenses. In this case, Milosevic's defense would be that because NATO's Allied Force campaign was unlawful, he cannot be held criminally liable for humanitarian law and genocide charges against him, or that because Albanian Kosovars committed atrocities, he cannot be held criminally liable for these charges. If this is Milosevic's theory, it is unavailing as a complete defense like some defenses, e.g., not guilty by reason of insanity, might be. Tu quoque, like a superior orders defense, may go to mitigation of sentence or a finding of no punishment; it is not a complete defense to liability for war crimes or genocide. Tu quoque only applies when the offense charged and the other side's actions are the same or similar. Thus, unless Milosevic proves NATO committed genocide, he cannot rely on tu quoque as to those charges against him; recent cases suggest the defense might not be available even under those circumstances. See 58 W.T. MALLISON, JR., STUDIES IN THE LAW OF NAVAL WARFARE: SUBMARINES IN GENERAL AND LIMITED WARS 88 (Naval War C. Int'l L. Stud. 1968); see also Horace B. Robertson, Jr., Submarine Warfare, JAG J. 3, 8 (1956) (commenting on 38 AM. U. INT'L. REV. [18:35 conflict ("LOAC") applied to NATO
Recommended publications
  • Abdülhamid II, 80–81 Abjection, 251, 494 Abolitionism, 74, 83, 85
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-10358-0 — The Problems of Genocide A. Dirk Moses Index More Information INDEX Abdülhamid II, 80–81 Britain and, 152, 506 abjection, 251, 494 civilian destruction and, 1, 151–152, abolitionism, 74, 83, 85–86, 88–89, 167–168, 230–232, 236, 238, 91–92, 124–125 439, 504–506 in American colonies, 69–70 collateral damage of, 1, 238 as birth of human rights justice, 72 colonialism and, 506 British, 68–73, 125–127 debate on, 18 Christianity and, 86–87 desensitization to, 432–433 colonialism and, 69–70, 87–88 drone strikes, 1, 3–4, 439–440, humanitarianism and, 68–73 490–491 imperialism and, 71–72, 87–88 erosion of distinction between as justification of imperial mission, combatants and civilians and, 71–72 503–507, 511 language of transgression and, 70–71 excluded from definition of genocide, Aborigines, 76–77, 87–88, 264–267 18–20 Aborigines Protection Society, 87–89 France and, 152 Abrahams, Elliot, 461–462 international law and, 503 Abyssinia, Italian invasion of, 167–168 liberal permanent security and, 506 Academic Liaison against Renewed missile strikes, 1–2, 439–440 Militarism, 458–459 Nazi regime and, 505 Acadians, 398–399 principle of distinction and, 503, accountability, 425–426, 428–430, 506–507 432–438, 451–452, 471–472, See terrorization of civilians by, 164–166 also responsibility United States and, 1–2, 36, 232, 237, Aceh, Indonesia, 114–116 396–397, 416–418, 424, Ache people, 445–447 430–433, 438–439, 457–458, 506 Aden, 391–392 Vietnam War and, 424 administrative separation, 335–336, See World
    [Show full text]
  • British Imperialism in Books from the “Third Reich”
    Empire and National Character: British Imperialism in Books from the “Third Reich” Victoria Jane Stiles, MA, MA Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2015 Abstract This thesis examines the variety of representations and rhetorical deployments of the theme of British Imperialism within books published in the “Third Reich”. The thesis considers these books not only as vehicles for particular ideas and arguments but also as consumer objects and therefore as the product of a series of compromises between the needs of a host of actors, both official and commercial. It further traces the origins of the component parts of these texts via the history of reuse of images and extracts and by identifying earlier examples of particular tropes of “Englishness” and the British Empire. British imperial history was a rich source of material for National Socialist writers and educators to draw on and lent itself to a wide variety of arguments. Britain could be, in turns, a symbol of “Nordic” strength, a civilisation in decline, a natural ally and protector of Germany, or a weak, corrupt, outdated entity, controlled by Germany’s supposed enemies. Drawing on a long tradition of comparing European colonial records, the British Empire was also used as a benchmark for Germany’s former imperial achievements, particularly in moral arguments regarding the treatment of indigenous populations. Through its focus on books, which were less ephemeral than media such as newspaper and magazine articles, radio broadcasts or newsreels, the thesis demonstrates how newer writings sought to recontextualise older material in the light of changing circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • The Final Campaigns: Bougainville 1944-1945
    University of Wollongong Thesis Collections University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Year The final campaigns: Bougainville 1944-1945 Karl James University of Wollongong James, Karl, The final campaigns: Bougainville 1944-1945, PhD thesis, School of History and Politics, University of Wollongong, 2005. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/467 This paper is posted at Research Online. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/467 The Final Campaigns: Bougainville 1944-1945 A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree Doctor of Philosophy from University of Wollongong by Karl James, BA (Hons) School of History and Politics 2005 i CERTIFICATION I, Karl James, declare that this thesis, submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy, in the School of History and Politics, University of Wollongong, is wholly my work unless otherwise referenced or acknowledged. The document has not been submitted for qualifications at any other academic institution. Karl James 20 July 2005 ii Table of Contents Maps, List of Illustrations iv Abbreviations vi Conversion viii Abstract ix Acknowledgments xi Introduction 1 1 ‘We have got to play our part in it’. Australia’s land war until 1944. 15 2 ‘History written is history preserved’. History’s treatment of the Final Campaigns. 30 3 ‘Once the soldier had gone to war he looked for leadership’. The men of the II Australian Corps. 51 4 ‘Away to the north of Queensland, On the tropic shores of hell, Stand grimfaced men who watch and wait, For a future none can tell’. The campaign takes shape: Torokina and the Outer Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • World War II at Sea This Page Intentionally Left Blank World War II at Sea
    World War II at Sea This page intentionally left blank World War II at Sea AN ENCYCLOPEDIA Volume I: A–K Dr. Spencer C. Tucker Editor Dr. Paul G. Pierpaoli Jr. Associate Editor Dr. Eric W. Osborne Assistant Editor Vincent P. O’Hara Assistant Editor Copyright 2012 by ABC-CLIO, LLC All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data World War II at sea : an encyclopedia / Spencer C. Tucker. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-59884-457-3 (hardcopy : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-1-59884-458-0 (ebook) 1. World War, 1939–1945—Naval operations— Encyclopedias. I. Tucker, Spencer, 1937– II. Title: World War Two at sea. D770.W66 2011 940.54'503—dc23 2011042142 ISBN: 978-1-59884-457-3 EISBN: 978-1-59884-458-0 15 14 13 12 11 1 2 3 4 5 This book is also available on the World Wide Web as an eBook. Visit www.abc-clio.com for details. ABC-CLIO, LLC 130 Cremona Drive, P.O. Box 1911 Santa Barbara, California 93116-1911 This book is printed on acid-free paper Manufactured in the United States of America To Malcolm “Kip” Muir Jr., scholar, gifted teacher, and friend. This page intentionally left blank Contents About the Editor ix Editorial Advisory Board xi List of Entries xiii Preface xxiii Overview xxv Entries A–Z 1 Chronology of Principal Events of World War II at Sea 823 Glossary of World War II Naval Terms 831 Bibliography 839 List of Editors and Contributors 865 Categorical Index 877 Index 889 vii This page intentionally left blank About the Editor Spencer C.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War, Humanitarian Law and the United Nations
    Civil War, Humanitarian Law and the United Nations Stefan Oeter I. Introduction Emer de Vattel, in his classical treatise "Le Droit des Gens ou Principes de la Loi Naturelle", introduced his observations concerning civil war with some famous remarks that urged for caution in dealing with the topic: "It is a much-discussed question whether the sovereign must observe the ordinary laws of war in dealing with rebellious subjects who have openly taken up arms against him. A flatterer at court or a cruel tyrant will immediately answer that the laws of war are not made for rebels, who deserve nothing better than death."' Vattel, however, reminded his readers to "proceed more temperatelyn and to argue the matter upon the "incon- testable principles" of reason and of natural law. The warning against precipitate conclusions that was formulated by Vattel still has its justification, even nowadays. This is not only due to the Martens clause: which in its modernized version in the Additional Pro- tocols of 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 provides that "... in cases not covered by the law in force, the human person remains under the protection of the principles of humanity and the dictates of the 1 E, de Vattel, The Law of Nations or the Principles ofNatural Law Applied to the Conduct and to the Affairs of Nattons and of Soveretgns, Translation of the Edition of 1758 by C.G. Fenwick, 1916,336 para. 287. 2 Concerning the Martens Clause cf. R. G. Allen/M. Cherniack / G. J. An- dreopoulos, "Refining War: Civil Wars and Humanitarian Controls", HRQ 18 (1996), 747 et seq., (751-752); H.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 April 2000 (Extract from Book 5)
    PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FIFTY-FOURTH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION 11 April 2000 (extract from Book 5) Internet: www.parliament.vic.gov.au/downloadhansard By authority of the Victorian Government Printer The Governor His Excellency the Honourable Sir JAMES AUGUSTINE GOBBO, AC The Lieutenant-Governor Professor ADRIENNE E. CLARKE, AO The Ministry Premier, Treasurer and Minister for Multicultural Affairs .............. The Hon. S. P. Bracks, MP Deputy Premier, Minister for Health and Minister for Planning......... The Hon. J. W. Thwaites, MP Minister for Industrial Relations and Minister assisting the Minister for Workcover..................... The Hon. M. M. Gould, MLC Minister for Transport............................................ The Hon. P. Batchelor, MP Minister for Energy and Resources, Minister for Ports and Minister assisting the Minister for State and Regional Development. The Hon. C. C. Broad, MLC Minister for State and Regional Development, Minister for Finance and Assistant Treasurer............................................ The Hon. J. M. Brumby, MP Minister for Local Government, Minister for Workcover and Minister assisting the Minister for Transport regarding Roads........ The Hon. R. G. Cameron, MP Minister for Community Services.................................. The Hon. C. M. Campbell, MP Minister for Education and Minister for the Arts...................... The Hon. M. E. Delahunty, MP Minister for Environment and Conservation and Minister for Women’s Affairs................................... The Hon. S. M. Garbutt, MP Minister for Police and Emergency Services and Minister for Corrections........................................ The Hon. A. Haermeyer, MP Minister for Agriculture and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs............ The Hon. K. G. Hamilton, MP Attorney-General, Minister for Manufacturing Industry and Minister for Racing............................................ The Hon. R. J. Hulls, MP Minister for Post Compulsory Education, Training and Employment....
    [Show full text]
  • Issue No. 29 WESTLINK 5 November
    Issue No. 29 WESTLINK 5 th November 2007 COMMITTEE 2007 – 2008 President: Fred BROWN Vice President: Mike VENN Secretary/Treasurer/Westlink Editor: Brian MEAD Committee Members: Brian FIRNS, Kim JOHNSTONE. Issue No 29 WESTLINK 5th November 2007 Page -_2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. From the President …………………………………. Page 3 2. Our Front Cover ……………………………………. Page 4 3. From the Editor …………………………………….. Page 4 4. Address by the GOVERNOR GENERAL ……. Page/s 5-7 5. Address by LTCOL Clem Sargent ....................... Page/s 8-9 6. THE RECEPTION …………………………………. Page 10 7. Reflections on the Dedication Ceremony ……… Page/s 11-12 8. ANZAC DAY 2007 ……………………………. ….. Page 13 9. IMAGES - ANNUAL RE-UNION DINNER / THE RAE WATERLOO DINNER ……………… Page 14 10. THE WESTON’S VISIT …………………….. ……. Page 15 11. THE PURPLE BERET …….…………..................... Page/s 16-18 12. BRIDGETOWN, WA – ANZAC DAY 2007 ….. Page/s 19-20 13. WARREN HALL – CITIZEN OF THE YEAR Page 21 14. TOODYAY, WA - ANZAC DAY 2007 …. ……. Page/s 22-23 15. DARWIN VISIT – AUGUST 2007 ………………. Page/s 24-27 16. ABOUT EMUS …….…………...................................... Page 28-30 17. MEMBERSHIP ……………….…….…………........... Page 31-32 Issue No 29 WESTLINK 5th November 2007 Page -_3 FROM THE PRESIDENT Greetings Fellow Members, Firstly, I would like to acknowledge the time and effort that our Hon Sec Brian Mead has put into the publication of this edition of Westlink. Brian has put many hours of soliciting, collecting, collating and editing items, even rebuilding his computer… Many thanks Brian! Whilst handing out bouquets, on behalf of our Association membership, I would like to congratulate Warren Hall on his nomination for Citizen of the Year in Toodyay.
    [Show full text]
  • Martens Clause Tyler D
    Hofstra Law Review Volume 41 | Issue 3 Article 8 2013 At War with the Robots: Autonomous Weapon Systems and the Martens Clause Tyler D. Evans Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Evans, Tyler D. (2013) "At War with the Robots: Autonomous Weapon Systems and the Martens Clause," Hofstra Law Review: Vol. 41: Iss. 3, Article 8. Available at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr/vol41/iss3/8 This document is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Evans: At War with the Robots: Autonomous Weapon Systems and the Martens NOTE AT WAR WITH THE ROBOTS: AUTONOMOUS WEAPON SYSTEMS AND THE MARTENS CLAUSE I. INTRODUCTION '[A] robot may not injure a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.' - Isaac Asimov, The First Law of Robotics' The Three Laws of Robotics ("Three Laws")2 are an elegant set of hierarchical rules that ethically and physically govern Isaac Asimov's science fiction robots.3 The Three Laws are programmatically embedded in the robots' "positronic brains,"4 and control their behavior and reasoning primarily to safeguard the human beings they were built to serve. 5 The Three Laws-successful in fiction for their simplicity, 1. ISAAC ASIMOV, Runaround, in I, ROBOT 25, 37 (Bantam Dell 2008) [hereinafter I, ROBOT]. 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Juridical Status of Irregular Combatants Under the International Humanitarian Law of Armed Conflict, 9 Case W
    Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 9 | Issue 1 1977 The urJ idical Status of Irregular Combatants under the International Humanitarian Law of Armed Conflict W. Thomas Mallison Sally V. Mallison Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation W. Thomas Mallison and Sally V. Mallison, The Juridical Status of Irregular Combatants under the International Humanitarian Law of Armed Conflict, 9 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 39 (1977) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol9/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 1977] The Juridical Status of Irregular Combatants under the International Humanitarian Law of Armed Conflict by W. Thomas Mallison* and Sally V. Mallison** CONTENTS 1. The Law of Armed Conflict: Participants, Process and Purposes .............................. 40 II. The Brussels Declaration (1874) ................................ 43 III. The Hague Conventions on the Law of Land Warfare (1899 and 1907) .............................................. 45 IV. The Geneva Prisoners of War Convention (1949) ............... 47 A. The Influence of the Second World War .................. 47 B. Criteria for Irregulars to Have Privileged Status ............ 49 1. Being Organized ..................................... 49 2. "Belonging to a Party to the Conflict" . ............... 50 a. Being Associated with a State Party to the Conflict ...................................... 50 b. The Organized Resistance Movement as a Party to the Conflict ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Otto Schniewind Testimony University of North Dakota
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Elwyn B. Robinson Department of Special Nuremberg Transcripts Collections 5-25-1948 High Command Case: Otto Schniewind Testimony University of North Dakota Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/nuremburg-transcripts Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation University of North Dakota, "High Command Case: Otto Schniewind Testimony" (1948). Nuremberg Transcripts. 16. https://commons.und.edu/nuremburg-transcripts/16 This Court Document is brought to you for free and open access by the Elwyn B. Robinson Department of Special Collections at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nuremberg Transcripts by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 25 May–A–MW–17–2–Gallagher (Int.Evand) COURT V, CASE XII THE PRESIDENT: You may have the same privileges and rights with respect to the documents that have been heretofore indicated. DR. FRITSCH: I merely have one request, Your Honor. In my opening statement I made a motion to strike Counts I and IV of the Indictment. I would now like to ask the Tribunal to rule on this motion. THE PRESIDENT: If you desire a ruling on that motion at this time, inasmuch as the testimony is now in,the [sic] motion will be overruled, because that is one of the essential questions that will have to be determined when the opinion is written. If there is no proof of these, why, of course, then those Counts have not been substantiated, but at this time the motion will be overruled.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline April 1940
    TIMELINE APRIL 1940 There are varying opinions as to when the Phoney War came to an end. Some say it was in April 1940 with the invasion of Norway and the first really significant and direct engagement on land between Ger- man and British forces. Others say that it was in May with the invasion of the low countries and France, and, of course, Dunkirk. Wherever you stand on this point there can be no doubt that the battle for Norway marked the point of no return – any slim hopes of securing a peace settlement were effectively blown sky high. April 1940 is ALL about the battle for Norway, and I make no apologies for the fact that I am going to talk mostly about that as we work through our timeline for the month. I’m going to start by clarifying the status of the Scandinavian countries in the run-up to the battle – and by that I mean Denmark, Norway and Sweden, leaving Finland to one side for the moment - and by briefly taking you back to events that we have already covered as they set the scene, or perhaps lit the fuse, for what was to come. SCANDINAVIA 1939 At the outbreak of war all three of these Scandinavian countries were neutral, and it would have served German strategic interests for all of them to have remained neutral throughout the war. But this attitude changed in the Spring of 1940 largely as a result of actual or feared allied actions to either draw the Scandinavian countries into the war, or to gain control of Scandinavian territory.
    [Show full text]
  • 1962 Volume 054 01 June
    THE PEGASUS THE JOURNAL OF THE GEELONG COLLEGE Vol. LV JUNE, 1962 S. J. MILES J. E. DAVIES Captain of School, 1962 Vice-Captain of School, 1962 D. J. LAIDLAW R. N. DOUGLAS Liet Prize for French, I960 Queen's Scholarship, 196' Ormond Scholarship, 1961 Proxime Accessit, 1961 Dux of College, 1961 JUNE, 1962. CONTENTS Page Council and Staff 4 Editorial 7 Speech Day 8 Principal's Report 8 School Prize Lists 14 Examination Results 16 Scholarships 17 Salvete 18 Valete 18 Sir Horace Robertson 21 School Diary 22 School Activities 24 Social Services 24 P.P. A 24 Morrison Library 25 Junior Clubs 25 Railway Society 26 Letter to the Editor 26 Pegasus Appeal 27 Sport 28 Cricket 28 Rowing 38 Swimming 40 Tennis 41 Original Contributions 43 Preparatory School 50 Old Boys 56 4 THE PEGASUS THE GEELONG COLLEGE COUNCIL Chairman: Sir Arthur Coles, K.B. D. S. Adam, Esq., LL.B. H. A. Anderson, Esq. A. Austin Gray, Esq. G. J. Betts, Esq. The Reverend M. J. Both. R. C. Dennis, Esq. P. N. Everist, Esq., B.Arch., A.R.A.I.A. F. M. Funston, Esq. The Reverend A. D. Hallam,, M.A., B.D. C. L. Hirst, Esq. The Hon. Sir Gordon McArthur, K.B., M.A, (Cantab.), M.L.C. P. McCallum, Esq., LL.B. E. W. McCann, Esq. F. E. Moreton, Esq., B.E.E., A.M.I.E. (Aust.). K. S. Nail, Esq. D. G. Neilson, Esq., F.C.A. Dr. H. N. Wettenhall, M.D, B.S., M.R.C.P., F.R.A.C.P.
    [Show full text]