l
18 PEACE IN VIETNAM , ~ __";-¢...L.i»=. 7 neutraiist government that he had been trying for so iong to estab- lish, from 1956 to 1958 it had openly undertaken to subvert and "'_,,- !.?,' .1 ._~ | topple his government by supporting the right-wing {actions under General Phoumi Nosovan. The Thai government, which joined the United States in backing Phoumi Nosovan. has continued to oppose the establishment of a neutralist Laos. This has not made Souvanna Phouma s subsequent efforts any easier. Whatever the settlement in Vietnam, the several ethnic components of Laos are likely to gravitate in the same directions they did prior to their I artiticiai administrative uni cation by France. Clearly the force of nationalism in the countries of Southeast Asia does not justify any simple domino-theory" approach in United States policy toward that area. The power of this national- ism will remain the watchful guardian of political independence, -- »92~ ;??.' " ~- poised against any hint of outside interference whether from __ " V.-J A", ? China or the United States. As long as Southeast Asian govern- . -A-. -- . . ments are in harmony with their countries nationalism and so long as they prove capable, wise, and strong enough to institute _ _ 92 -I - -- . V -. - .- s" :. ~=:-r 1- r. a*" ,: ._ ¢'=!" "<~ v'»-' » -.<. =- .- .'-.-; : =1-_I the basic reforms necessary to meet the most pressing socioeco- y . n .92 - _., w - : .f-;'; - _.r-I J " V, - .- 92-f _§ :'.-?,%.j_*7 ~ ~ A 3 ;.,";=_~ - L7 -E1 nomic demands of their peoples, indigenous Communist leaders are likely to encounter little success. .. . ~~ 7 "|92:é.:I A -, -1- 1 How well is the United States relating to these demands for I.!~ _=.:~=_"--. ;_Q__=_» ~,:;,M -, ~"-t '> ,,- L _ ,_;:-- pp--7,]; .51 _y_;;.;=i;|.k:~t__'._~; ;.*,;;;4r=-gr;',- .__ .__5_.£ ,-B-7_f_92g;r i'-";y; =35} >.:_;,,_-,- "| 4:'I,*ue<'|s.""l$::|i'--Ii rki-'f¢5-'.92'lZ'1s'i»-$' §;.__~_;;E_,}-_£ ,} »;;;. %;1."- 1 social revolution and thereby contributing to the security and sta- bility of the newly emerging nations of Southeast Asia?
f .~ ;1 ' I 1 I H
1 ,
£1- I""15_ i } _
I _ _l 92
Mr fl
1 -iv-xi Y I -1 '<- . V .92 . e - ~- » -_ ,5.92 . . ' L . "_".,H .-. . n I II _ . - I - M fa: 1 E . . V _ .__ -,.,..__'_._ _iv; - %,~._»;.'_ 55" 7- - t- r~ =.E"' 22/ 2-;i>-- e=" ~ " ~
-av
3: The Need For Socioeconomic __ ;- Fl p'_____e_:Q Changein SoutheastAsia
Too often, in the complexities ofthe Vietnam situation itscli we forget that since World War II a greater percentage ofthl .-,i . - T -».- »-7 ..-- - I -4 _ f »_e- ."-l'!>." ";l.l-!H.7. ---Z-. - r- ..;.=;- .<.~,.»h.~92. .92' _. . " ">;*.':'~.-. . . r wor1d s wealth has become concentrated in the hands of a smalle V;~ '- . - I-.92.92.---"- c.- rm: 3 _.-_'--,, . ~-92 "..- 2'- ~».-w _.-V-1,1-._'_ ,A 1 .?92-1' .. 1;, -'2 percentage ofthe earth