Case Study North West England

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Case Study North West England Contract No. 2008.CE.16.0.AT.020 concerning the ex post evaluation of cohesion policy programmes 2000‐2006 co‐financed by the European Regional Development Fund (Objectives 1 and 2) Work Package 4 “Structural Change and Globalisation” CASE STUDY NORTH WEST ENGLAND (UK) Prepared by: David Bradley (CURDS, Newcastle University) and Paul Benneworth (KITE) for: European Commission Directorate General Regional Policy Policy Development Evaluation Unit CSIL, Centre for Industrial Studies, Milan, Italy Joanneum Research, Graz, Austria Technopolis Group, Brussels, Belgium In association with Nordregio, the Nordic Centre for Spatial Development, Stockholm, Sweden KITE, Centre for Knowledge, Innovation, Technology and Enterprise, Newcastle, UK Case Study – North West England (UK) Acronyms BERD Business Expenditure on R&D DG REGIO Directorate General for Regional Policy DTI Department of Trade and Industry EC European Commission ERDF European Regional Development Fund ESF European Social Fund EU European Union FDI Foreign Direct Investment FEA Fund Eligible Area FIFG Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance GDP Gross Domestic Product GERD Gross Domestic Expenditure on R&D GO‐NW Government Office for the North West ICT Information and Communication Technology NWDA West Development Agency OECD Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development PMC Programme Management Committee R&D Research and Development RDA Regional Development Agency RES Regional Economic Strategy RTDI Research, Technological Development and Innovation SME Small and Medium Enterprise SPD Single Programming Document WP Work Package II Work Package 4: “Structural Change and Globalisation” Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction 5 1. Structural change and globalisation in perspective 7 1.1 The region at a glance 7 1.2 Searching the roots of change: socio‐economic history of the region 14 1.3 Regional structural change and globalisation issues in 2000‐2006 15 1.3.1 Dimensions of structural change 15 1.3.2 Understanding the geography of structural change 26 2. Regional policy 2000‐2006: strategy and objectives 31 2.1 Regional policy mix for structural change and globalisation 31 2.2 Overall strategy of the 2000‐2006 Objective 2 programme 34 2.3 Selected fields of intervention and measures 40 2.3.1 Selection logic 40 2.3.2 Detailed description of the selected measures 41 3. Effects of the selected ERDF measures on the process of structural change and adaptation to globalisation 43 3.1 Assessment of the structural and socio‐economic effects 43 3.1.1 Performance of selected measures 43 3.1.2 Contribution of selected measures to structural change and globalisation 47 3.2 Assessment of the effects on institutional capacity and policy learning 49 4. Conclusions: key findings and main message 53 Key findings 53 Main Message 54 5. Annexes 57 5.1 Statistical tables 57 5.2 Details of measures relevant with respect to Structural Change and Globalisation 70 5.3 References 72 5.4 List of persons interviewed 75 III Case Study – North West England (UK) List of tables Table 1.1 ‐ Base economic data for the North West England region 8 Table 1.2 ‐ North West England Objective 2 eligible areas (NUTS3), 2000‐2006 10 Table 1.3 ‐ Objective 2 area population by county, 2000‐2006 10 Table 1.4 ‐ Sectoral employment in the North West England compared to UK and EU levels 17 Table 1.5 ‐ Concentration of manufacturing by NUTS1 region, 2005 18 Table 1.6 ‐ Employment changes by sector, North West England and UK, 1996‐2006, % 19 Table 1.7 ‐ Innovation potential (NUTS1) 21 Table 1.8 ‐ Major job creation projects through business expansion in the North West England in the study period 25 Table 1.9 ‐ Major job losses and prospective losses in the North West England in the study period 25 Table 1.10 ‐ Key sub‐regional economic data on the North West England(including Merseyside) 27 Table 1.11 ‐ Sub‐regional distribution of key clusters by county, North West, 27 Table 1.12 ‐ Cluster organisations and promotion activities in the North West England 30 Table 2.1 ‐ Synoptic view of the Objective 2 programme 34 Table 2.2 ‐ Summary of priority objectives and allocated resources for Programme 34 Table 2.3 ‐ Balance between allocation of resources between priorities in eligible and transition areas, North West England Objective 2 programme SPD 2000‐2006 in % 35 Table 2.4 ‐ Balance between allocation of resources between priorities in eligible and transition areas, North West England Objective 2 programme SPD 2000‐2006. Final Total ERDF paid (provisional data) in % 35 Table 2.5 ‐ Overview of the Objective 2 programme by Priority Area and available resources 36 Table 2.6 ‐ Priority 1 businesses and ideas: indicative breakdown by field (eligible/transitional areas) 37 Table 2.7 ‐ The split between focus areas in Priority 1 37 Table 2.8 ‐ A breakdown of priority 1 ERDF expenditure by area of activity 38 Table 2.9 ‐ Priority 3 strategic regional infrastructure: indicative breakdown by field (eligible/ transitional areas) 38 Table 2.10 ‐ The allocation of funding between sub‐priorities within Priority 3 39 Table 2.11 ‐ A breakdown of priority 3 ERDF expenditure by area of activity 39 Table 2.12 ‐ Measures relevant with respect to structural change and globalisation: main features 41 Table 3.1 ‐ Top ten ERDF‐funded measures by ERDF contribution, Measure 1.2 (increasing SME competitiveness) 44 Table 3.2 ‐ The distribution of projects by size, and total spend on projects by size, Measure 1.2 44 IV Work Package 4: “Structural Change and Globalisation” Table 3.3 ‐ Proportional allocation of funding between Action Plans under Measure 1.2 45 Table 3.4 – Measure 1.2 ‐ SPD Outputs and ‘Results’ targets, contracted and achieved 46 Table 5.1 ‐ Taxonomy of objective 2 eligible areas (NUTS3) 57 Table 5.2 ‐ Regional performance in comparative perspective (NUTS2) ‐ Basic data 58 Table 5.3 ‐ Socio‐economic change and human capital (NUTS2) 58 Table 5.4 ‐ Regional specialisation (NUTS1) 59 Table 5.5 ‐ Production system (NUTS1) 60 Table 5.6 ‐ Innovation potential (NUTS1) 61 Table 5.7 ‐ Relocations and restructuring 62 Table 5.8 ‐ Geography of structural change (NUTS3) 64 Table 5.9 ‐ Geography of structural change (NUTS3) 65 Table 5.10 ‐ Geography of structural change (NUTS3) 67 Table 5.11 ‐ Geography of structural change (NUTS2) – Clusters* 69 Table 5.12 ‐ Geography of structural change (NUTS2) – Organisations 70 Table 5.13 ‐ The distribution of projects by size, and total spend on projects by size, Priority 1.1 70 Table 5.14 ‐ The distribution of projects by size, and total spend on projects by size, Priority 1.2 71 Table 5.15 ‐ The distribution of projects by size, and total spend on projects by size, Priority 1.3 71 Table 5.16 ‐ The distribution of projects by size, and total spend on projects by size, Priority 1.4 71 Table 5.17 ‐ The distribution of projects by size, and total spend on projects by size, Priority 1.5 72 Table 5.18 ‐ The distribution of projects by size, and total spend on projects by size, Priority 3.1 72 V Case Study – North West England (UK) List of figures Figure 1.1 ‐ Map of the eligible area in the North West, 2000‐2006 9 Figure 1.2 ‐ Map of the eligible areas for funding in the North West, 2000‐2006 by category of eligibility 11 Figure 1.3 ‐ The impacts of globalisation on business in the North West 13 Figure 1.4 ‐ Specialisation by technology level of manufacturing 1996‐2006, Selected UK regions 20 Figure 1.5 ‐ Specialisation by technology level of manufacturing 1996‐2006, Selected Italian regions 20 Figure 1.6 ‐ North West England on the OECD innovation scoreboard 22 Figure 1.7 ‐ Piemonte on the OECD innovation scoreboard 22 Figure 1.8 ‐ Value of export of goods 2001 and 2006, GBP per employee 26 Figure 1.9 ‐ Provision of infrastructure supporting key sectors and clusters in the North West England 29 Figure 1.10 ‐ Patenting by sub‐region and sector, per million inhabitants (2004) 30 VI Work Package 4: “Structural Change and Globalisation” Executive Summary Scope and research methods This report has been prepared as a contribution to the DG REGIO commissioned ex post Evaluation of the cohesion policy programmes financed by the European Regional Development Fund during the period 2000‐ 2006, Work Package 4: Structural Change and Globalisation. The results and outcomes of the five measures funded under Priority 1 of the 2000‐2006 Programme (related to SME growth and competitiveness) and one under Priority 3 (related to strategic sites and premises) considered particularly relevant in the context of structural change and adaptation to globalisation and drilled down in more detail to examine Measure 1.2. The study is based on various information sources including: in depth semi‐structured interviews with regional and sub‐regional authorities (intermediary organisations financed under the selected measures, regional policymakers, Action Plan managing authorities); as well as analysis of various secondary data sources including programming and evaluation reports, statistical and monitoring data and scholarly articles (see Annex 5.2). Key research question and hypothesis tested in the case study The main research question addressed by the North West England case study is the extent to which regional policy measures co‐financed by the ERDF in the Objective 2 programme 2000‐2006, to support structural change and adaptation to globalisation have helped the innovation potential of the economic fabric of the North West England. The assessment of the effects of the selected ERDF measures aims to highlight the contribution of the Objective 2 programme to structural change in the North West England and in doing so tests one of the working hypotheses proposed in the conceptual model developed by the study, namely that “their innovation system may suffer from missing innovation drivers on the demand side.
Recommended publications
  • South Lakeland Connection
    Cumbria County Council ilable ava thro es u iv gh at C ti u i - Voluntary Car Scheme m in b t - Rural Wheels r r i Rural Wheels o - Community Wheels a p C s - Village Wheels o is a unique n u Rural a - Community Minibus n r T t transport scheme Sharing Scheme y y t C i o n for people in rural For more information u u n m c contact: 0333 240 69 65i m Wheels l : areas. It provides o transport from C (option 5) home to your nearest town or Public Transport South Lakeland connection. May 2021 It can be used for a variety of purposes such as: Once your application has been received you will be issued with a Rural Wheels smart card. Attending doctor/dentist/ This is a credit card sized plastic card with an opticians appointments electronic chip that stores points to be used Shopping when you travel. One point is one penny so your Visiting people in hospital £5 payment becomes 500 points. Visiting friends etc How to pay for journeys Rural Wheels uses a smart card system that Transport will be charged at the subsidised rate stores points to pay for your travel instead of of 45p (45points) per mile. You need to have cash, and a central booking system to plan your your smart card with you when making your journeys. You must apply for your smart card journey, as the driver will ask for it to deduct the before you can use Rural Wheels. necessary points.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Pollution Records from Urban Lake Sediments: the Implications of Datable, Lacustrine Sedimentary Archives for Epidemiology
    Air Pollution XIV 735 Air pollution records from urban lake sediments: the implications of datable, lacustrine sedimentary archives for epidemiology A. T. Worsley1, A. L. Power1, C. A. Booth2, N. Richardson1, P. G. Appleby3 & C. Orton4 1Natural.Geographical and Applied Sciences, Edge Hill University College, Ormskirk, Lancashire, UK 2Research Institute in Advanced Technologies (RIATec), The University of Wolverhampton, West Midlands, UK 3Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK 4Halton Primary Care Trust, Widnes, Cheshire, UK Abstract Sediment pollution records from several small, urban, man-made lakes from Merseyside and Halton (N.W. England, UK) are presented. They demonstrate that lake sediments can be used to reconstruct atmospheric pollution histories that encompass the entire Industrial Revolution (the last 250 years) in the U.K. Regionally, this was a period that saw the instigation, development and subsequent expansion of major industrial activity, such as iron and steel production, petro-chemical manufacture and power generation, followed by rises in road and air travel. Through the use of analytical techniques, such as environmental magnetism, together with 210Pb dating, urban lacustrine stratigraphic records illustrate that the types and levels of atmospheric pollution have changed temporally. The work promotes the ethos that such archives could be vital to our understanding of past, present and future relationships between human health and the environment. Keywords: atmospheric particulate pollution, lake sediments, mineral magnetism, environmental health. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Vol 86, © 2006 WIT Press www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3541 (on-line) doi:10.2495/AIR06073 736 Air Pollution XIV 1 Introduction Epidemiologists express major concerns about relationships between atmospheric quality and human health [1, 2, 3].
    [Show full text]
  • Garrick Parade, Lord Street Southport, Merseyside Pr8 1Rn
    GARRICK PARADE, LORD STREET SOUTHPORT, MERSEYSIDE PR8 1RN TOWN CENTRE LEISURE INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENT SUMMARY • Located in the affluent costal town of Southport. • Current rent of £195,778 per annum. • Comprising 47,734 sq ft. • May be suitable for alternative uses subject to necessary planning consents. • Site area of approximately 0.92 acres, situated in the town centre. • Seeking offers in excess of £1.667M (One Million Six Hundred and Sixty subject to contract and exclusive of VAT. • Let to Mecca Bingo Ltd until September 2021. Seven Thousand Pounds) • Net initial yield of 11% after allowance for unadjusted purchasers costs • Tenant did not exercise their recent break option showing their of 6.8%. commitment to the property. LOCATION SITUATION Southport is an attractive and affluent coastal town located in Merseyside approximately 16 miles The subject property is situated on the north side of Garrick Parade which runs parallel to Lord north of Liverpool, and 34 miles north west of Manchester. Road communications are excellent Street, one of Southport’s principal retailing thoroughfares. Nearby occupiers include a large with the town benefiting from the A565 which runs south to Liverpool and north to Preston. Morrisons supermarket, B&M Bargains, Travelodge, Pizza Express and JD Wetherspoon. Rail links in Southport are also strong with Southport Railway Station providing regular direct services to Liverpool Central with an approximate journey time of 45 minutes. MANCHESTER KINGSWAY D U K E S T . OS Plan B&W 333200 333300 417100 417100 DESCRIPTION The subject property comprises a grade II listed bingo hall of brick construction with a site area of approximately 0.92 acres.
    [Show full text]
  • (Lancashire North of the Sands), No Religious House Arose In
    AN INTRODUCTION TO THE RELIGIOUS HOUSES OF CUMBRIA In Furness, (Lancashire north of the sands), no religious house arose in the poor and remote districts which in the twelfth century became the county of Lancaster, until nearly thirty years after the Norman Conquest. Of the three Cistercian houses Furness was the earliest, having been founded at Tulketh near Preston in 1124, and removed to Furness in 1127; There were two houses of Austin Canons; the priory of Conishead was founded (at first as a hospital) before 1181, the priory of Cartmel about 1190. Furness and Cartmel, exercised feudal lordship over wide tracts of country. Furness naturally resented the foundation of Conishead so close to itself, and on land under its own lordship, but the quarrel was soon composed. In Cumberland, within a comparatively small area, six monastic foundations carried on their work with varying success for almost four centuries. Four of these houses were close to the border, and suffered much during the long period of hostility between the two kingdoms. The priories of Carlisle and Lanercost, separated only by some 10 miles, were of the Augustinian order; the abbeys of Holmcultram and Calder, between which there seems to have been little communication, were of the Cistercian; and the priories of Wetheral and St. Bees were cells of the great Benedictine abbey of St. Mary, York Detailed accounts of all the monastic houses in the former counties of Cumberland and Lancashire appeared in the introductory volumes of the original Victoria County Histories of the two counties, published in 1905 and 1908 respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • 1St XI ECB Premier League
    1st XI ECB Premier League SATURDAY, APRIL 23 Bowdon v Bramhall Hyde v Chester BH Macclesfield v Alderley Edge Neston v Cheadle Toft v Nantwich Urmston v Timperley SATURDAY, APRIL 30 Alderley Edge v Toft Bramhall v Macclesfield Cheadle v Hyde Chester BH v Bowdon Nantwich v Urmston Timperley v Neston SATURDAY. MAY 7 Bowdon v Hyde Macclesfield v Chester BH Neston v Nantwich Timperley v Cheadle Toft v Bramhall Urmston v Alderley Edge SATURDAY, MAY 14 Alderley Edge v Neston Bramhall v Urmston Cheadle v Bowdon Chester BH v Toft Hyde v Macclesfield Nantwich v Timperley SATURDAY MAY 21 Macclesfield v Bowdon Nantwich v Cheadle Neston v Bramhall Timperley v Alderley Edge Toft v Hyde Urmston v Chester BH SATURDAY, MAY 28 Alderley Edge v Nantwich Bowdon v Toft Bramhall v Timperley Cheadle v Macclesfield Chester BH v Neston Hyde v Urmston P3 Fixtures SATURDAY, JUNE 4 Alderley Edge v Cheadle Nantwich v Bramhall Neston v Hyde Tinperley v Chester BH Toft v Macclesfield Urmston v Bowdon SATURDAY. JUNE 11 Bowdon v Neston Bramhall v Alderley Edge Cheadle v Toft Chester BH v Nantwich Macclesfield v Urmston Timperley v Hyde SATURDAY, JUNE 18 Alderley Edge v Chester BH Bramhall v Cheadle Nantwich v Hyde Neston v Macclesfield Timperley v Bowdon Urmston v Toft SATURDAY, JUNE 25 Bowdon v Nantwich Cheadle v Urmston Chester BH v Bramhall Hyde v Alderley Edge Timperley v Macclesfield Toft v Neston SATURDAY, JULY 2 Alderley Edge v Bowdon Bramhall v Hyde Chester BH v Cheadle Nantwich v Macclesfield Neston v Urmston Timperley v Toft SATURDAY.
    [Show full text]
  • Southport Bid
    November 2014 SOUTHPORT BID SOUTHPORT DESTINATION SURVEY 2014 NORTH WEST RESEARCH North West Research, operated by: The Liverpool City Region Local Enterprise Partnership 12 Princes Parade Liverpool, L3 1BG 0151 237 3521 North West Research This study has been produced by the in-house research team at the Liverpool City Region Local Enterprise Partnership. The team produces numerous key publications for the area, including the annual Digest of Tourism Statistics, in addition to collating key data and managing many regular research projects such as Hotel Occupancy and the Merseyside Visitor Survey. Under the badge of North West Research (formerly known as England‟s Northwest Research Service) the team conducts numerous commercial research projects, with a particular specialism in the visitor economy and event evaluation. Over the last 10 years, North West Research has completed over 250 projects for both public and private sector clients. 2 | Southport Destination Survey 2014 NORTH WEST RESEARCH CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1.2 Research aims 1 1.3 Methodology VISITOR PROFILE 2.1 Visitor origin 2.2 Group composition 2.3 Employment status 2 VISIT PROFILE 3.1 Type of visit 3.2 Accommodation 3 VISIT MOTIVATION 4.1 Visit motivation 4.2 Marketing influences 4.3 Frequency of visits to Southport 4 TRANSPORT 5.1 Mode of transport 5.2 Car park usage 5 VISIT SATISFACTION 6.1 Visit satisfaction ratings 6.2 Safety 6.3 Likelihood of recommending 6 6.4 Overall satisfaction TOURISM INFORMATION CENTRES 7.1 TIC Awareness 7 VISIT ACTIVITY 8.1 Visit activity 8.2 Future visits to Sefton‟s Natural Coast 8 VISITOR SPEND 9.1 Visitors staying in Southport 9.2 Visitors staying outside Southport 9.3 Day visitors 9 APPENDIX 1: Questionnaire 3 | Southport Destination Survey 2014 NORTH WEST RESEARCH INTRODUCTION 1 1.1: BACKGROUND The Southport Destination Survey is a study focusing on exploring visitor patterns, establishing what motivates people to visit the town, identifying visitor spending patterns, and examining visitor perceptions and satisfaction ratings.
    [Show full text]
  • X30 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    X30 bus time schedule & line map X30 Runcorn Halton Lea - Frodsham - Chester View In Website Mode The X30 bus line Runcorn Halton Lea - Frodsham - Chester has one route. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Chester: 6:58 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest X30 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next X30 bus arriving. Direction: Chester X30 bus Time Schedule 57 stops Chester Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 6:58 PM Halton Lea North, Palace Fields Second Avenue, Runcorn Tuesday 6:58 PM Halton Lea South, Palace Fields Wednesday 6:58 PM The Link, Runcorn Thursday 6:58 PM Halton Lodge, Grange Friday 6:58 PM Handforth Lane, Grange Saturday 6:58 PM 1 Handforth Lane, Runcorn Arriva Depot, Beechwood Mormon Church, Runcorn Heath X30 bus Info Clifton Road, England Direction: Chester Stops: 57 Coniston Close, Beechwood Trip Duration: 53 min 2 Coniston Close, England Line Summary: Halton Lea North, Palace Fields, Halton Lea South, Palace Fields, Halton Lodge, Beechwood Grange, Handforth Lane, Grange, Arriva Depot, 5 Sedbergh Grove, Runcorn Beechwood, Mormon Church, Runcorn Heath, Coniston Close, Beechwood, Beechwood, Martindale, Martindale, Beechwood Beechwood, Hillview School, Beechwood, Cherry 28 Wisenholme Close, England Blossom, Beechwood, Post O∆ce, Sutton Weaver, Aston Lane, Sutton Weaver, Aston Lane, Sutton Hillview School, Beechwood Weaver, Clifton Road, Sutton Weaver, Quay Side, 19 Brambling Close, Runcorn Newtown, Texaco Garage, Frodsham, St Hilda's Drive, Frodsham, Lloyds Bank,
    [Show full text]
  • Cheshire East: Developing Emotionally Healthy Children and Young People
    CHESHIRE EAST: DEVELOPING EMOTIONALLY HEALTHY CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE The Cheshire East emotionally healthy children and young people partnership is led by Cheshire East council’s children’s services, and is primarily funded from the council’s public health budget. Many organisations have been actively involved in developing the partnership including the NHS’s local clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) and children’s and adolescents mental health services (CAMHS), headteachers, and several vol- untary organisations. As a council senior manager explained: “It’s all partnership working. We work with schools, with the CCG, with health providers, with school nurses, health visitors, early years services, third sector organisations.” As a health lead commented: “It is pretty unique in its nature and scope.” The partnership’s aim is to support children and young people in becoming more mentally resilient: to be better able to manage their own mental health, to pro- cess what is going on in their environment, and to access specialist services should they need them. They want to reduce the number of children and young people attending accident and emergency services, or being inappropriately re- ferred to the CAMHS. The partnership’s original focus was creating ‘emotionally healthy schools’, but they are now extending their reach into early years settings. “We have been really blessed in support from above. We have had investment in to this project year after year. The moral and ethical support is there but also Pinancial.” INITIAL PHASE In 2015 CCGs were required to produce a local ‘children and mental health trans- formation plan’ to implement the NHS’s national ‘Five Year Forward View’ and ‘Future in Mind’ recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Growth Strategy
    Economic Growth Strategy Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 3 Economic conditions ............................................................................................................. 4 Economic geography............................................................................................................. 5 Economic assessment .......................................................................................................... 8 Vision, aims and objectives ................................................................................................. 11 Economic purpose............................................................................................................... 12 Priority actions for South Lakeland ...................................................................................... 14 How we will deliver .............................................................................................................. 18 Sources of Evidence for SWOT Analysis ............................................................................ 19 www.southlakeland.gov.uk www.investinsouthlakeland.co.uk Executive Summary South Lakeland aspires to be the very best place to work and to do business. It is an ambition that focuses on the need to create the right opportunities
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 No. 170 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2005 No. 170 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The County of Lancashire (Electoral Changes) Order 2005 Made - - - - 1st February 2005 Coming into force in accordance with article 1(2) Whereas the Boundary Committee for England(a), acting pursuant to section 15(4) of the Local Government Act 1992(b), has submitted to the Electoral Commission(c) recommendations dated October 2004 on its review of the county of Lancashire: And whereas the Electoral Commission have decided to give effect, with modifications, to those recommendations: And whereas a period of not less than six weeks has expired since the receipt of those recommendations: Now, therefore, the Electoral Commission, in exercise of the powers conferred on them by sections 17(d) and 26(e) of the Local Government Act 1992, and of all other powers enabling them in that behalf, hereby make the following Order: Citation and commencement 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the County of Lancashire (Electoral Changes) Order 2005. (2) This Order shall come into force – (a) for the purpose of proceedings preliminary or relating to any election to be held on the ordinary day of election of councillors in 2005, on the day after that on which it is made; (b) for all other purposes, on the ordinary day of election of councillors in 2005. Interpretation 2. In this Order – (a) The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of the Electoral Commission, established by the Electoral Commission in accordance with section 14 of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (c.41). The Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (S.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy 2021-2025 Introduction Our Vision
    Improving Health and Wellbeing in Cheshire and Merseyside Strategy 2021-2025 Introduction Our Vision The NHS Long Term Plan published in 2019 called for health and care to be more joined up locally to meet people’s needs. Since then, ICSs (Integrated Care Systems) We want everyone in Cheshire and Merseyside to have developed across England as a vehicle for the NHS to work in partnership have a great start in life, and get the support they with local councils and other key stakeholders to take collective responsibility for need to stay healthy and live longer. improving the health and wellbeing of the population, co-ordinating services together and managing resources collectively. Cheshire and Merseyside was designated an ICS by NHS England in April 2021. Our Mission Cheshire and Merseyside is one of the largest ICSs with a population of 2.6 million people living across a large and diverse geographical footprint. We will tackle health inequalities and improve the The ICS brings together nine ‘Places’ lives of the poorest fastest. We believe we can do coterminous with individual local this best by working in partnership. authority boundaries, 19 NHS Provider Trusts and 51 Primary Care Networks. There are many underlying population In the pages that follow, we set out our strategic objectives and associated aspirations health challenges in the region; for that will enable us to achieve our vision and mission over the next five years. They are example in Liverpool City Region 44% derived from NHS England’s stated purpose for ICSs and joint working with our partners of the population live in the top 20% to identify the key areas for focus if we are to reduce health inequalities and improve lives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future Climate of North West England
    The University of Manchester Research The future climate of North West England Link to publication record in Manchester Research Explorer Citation for published version (APA): Cavan, G., Carter, J. G., & Kazmierczak, A. (2010). The future climate of North West England. EcoCities project, University of Manchester. Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on Manchester Research Explorer is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Proof version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Explorer are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Takedown policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please refer to the University of Manchester’s Takedown Procedures [http://man.ac.uk/04Y6Bo] or contact [email protected] providing relevant details, so we can investigate your claim. Download date:08. Oct. 2021 The future climate of North West England Cavan, G. Carter, J. and Kazmierczak, A. 1 Introduction........................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Background to climate change................................................................... 3 1.2 Emissions scenarios .................................................................................
    [Show full text]