Significant Absorption of Topical Tacrolimus in 3 Patients with Netherton Syndrome

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Significant Absorption of Topical Tacrolimus in 3 Patients with Netherton Syndrome OBSERVATION Significant Absorption of Topical Tacrolimus in 3 Patients With Netherton Syndrome Angel Allen, MD; Elaine Siegfried, MD; Robert Silverman, MD; Mary L. Williams, MD; Peter M. Elias, MD; Sarolta K. Szabo, MD; Neil J. Korman, MD, PhD Background: Tacrolimus is a macrolide immunosup- limus in organ transplant recipients. None of these pressant approved in oral and intravenous formulations patients developed signs or symptoms of toxic effects of for primary immunosuppression in liver and kidney trans- tacrolimus. plantation. Topical 0.1% tacrolimus ointment has re- cently been shown to be effective in atopic dermatitis for Conclusions: Patients with Netherton syndrome have children as young as 2 years of age, with minimal sys- a skin barrier dysfunction that puts them at risk for in- temic absorption. We describe 3 patients treated with topi- creased percutaneous absorption. The Food and Drug Ad- cal 0.1% tacrolimus who developed significant systemic ministration recently approved 0.1% tacrolimus oint- absorption. ment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Children with Netherton syndrome may be misdiagnosed as having Observation: Three patients previously diagnosed as atopic dermatitis. These children are at risk for marked having Netherton syndrome were treated at different cen- systemic absorption and associated toxic effects. If topi- ters with 0.1% tacrolimus ointment twice daily. Two pa- cal tacrolimus is used in this setting, monitoring of se- tients showed dramatic improvement. All patients were rum tacrolimus levels is essential. found to have tacrolimus blood levels within or above the established therapeutic trough range for oral tacro- Arch Dermatol. 2001;137:747-750 ETHERTON syndrome is taneous absorption of the drug, with serum an autosomal recessive levels well above the therapeutic range. disorder characterized by congenital erythro- REPORT OF CASES derma, hair shaft de- Nfects, frequent infections, poor growth, and CASE 1 food allergies. The gene defect was re- cently localized to chromosome 5q32 and A 5-year-old boy had been born prema- identified as a mutation in the SPINK5 turely and had had congenital erythro- gene, encoding the serine protease inhibi- derma complicated by Staphylococcus au- tor LEKTI (lymphoepithelial Kazal-type reus sepsis. Continuing problems beyond related inhibitor).1 the neonatal period included erythro- From the Department of The pathognomonic cutaneous find- derma with scaling scalp, sparse hair, fre- Dermatology, Saint Louis ing in Netherton syndrome, ichthyosis lin- University Health Sciences quent otitis media, recurrent sinusitis, and Center, St Louis, Mo (Drs Allen earis circumflexa, develops in 75% of cases poor growth. Netherton syndrome was di- and Siegfried); Departments of but is not usually evident in infancy or agnosed at 9 months of age by demonstra- 2 Pediatrics and Dermatology, early childhood. A more common pre- tion of the pathognomonic hair shaft de- University of Virginia, McLean senting sign is generalized redness and fect, trichorrhexis invaginata. Initially, his (Dr Silverman); Department of scaling, which has been mistaken for atopic skin care regimen consisted of daily bath- Dermatology, University of dermatitis. The erythroderma is often ing with Cetaphil (Galderma Laborato- California–San Francisco widespread and resistant to therapy. A re- ries, LP, Paris, France) and frequent use (Drs Williams and Elias); cent report described a 20-year-old man of Aquaphor (Beiersdorf Inc, Wilton, Dermatology Service, Veterans with ichthyosis linearis circumflexa who Conn). He was unavailable for follow-up Affairs Medical Center, improved dramatically with topical tacro- care from ages 3 to 5 years. San Francisco (Dr Elias); 3 and Case Western Reserve limus treatment. We describe 3 children At age 5 years, his erythroderma was University/University Hospitals with Netherton syndrome and erythro- unresponsive to conservative topical thera- of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio derma treated with 0.1% tacrolimus oint- pies, including ketoconazole shampoo and (Drs Szabo and Korman). ment who experienced significant percu- 2.5% tar ointment, as well as more aggres- (REPRINTED) ARCH DERMATOL / VOL 137, JUNE 2001 WWW.ARCHDERMATOL.COM 747 ©2001 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/27/2021 sive short trials with limited applications of lactic and sali- tolerable stinging and exudative erythroderma, which sub- cylic acid lotion and 0.1% tazarotene ointment alone and sided after 1 week without the medication. Results of patch in combination with a class 1 topical corticosteroid. Ag- tests with the study drug and the extemporaneous com- gressive treatments were used on limited areas for a maxi- pound ointment were negative. Another trial of propri- mum of 1 week because of concern about percutaneous etary 0.1% tacrolimus ointment was applied to one arm absorption. We treated this patient in a double-blinded twice a day for 7 days, with the same adverse reaction. A fashion with extemporaneously formulated 0.1% tacro- tacrolimus level determined within 48 hours of the last limus in white petrolatum twice daily on one side of the application was 23 ng/mL. Complete blood cell count, scalp and face and white petrolatum on the other side. renal function, and hepatic function were normal. The He had a marked decrease in crusting, scale, and ery- patient did not tolerate retreatment with extemporane- thema on both sides, but the tacrolimus-treated side was ously compounded 0.03% tacrolimus ointment. A 24- noted at 3-week and 8-week follow-up visits to have near- hour postapplication drug level was 8.3 ng/mL. She elected complete clearing. A total of 15 g of tacrolimus oint- to discontinue treatment with tacrolimus ointment. ment was then applied sparingly to his trunk, shoul- ders, scalp, and face twice daily. On day 5, whole-blood CASE 3 tacrolimus level was 37.2 ng/mL 2 hours after treatment (therapeutic trough range in organ transplant recipi- A 3-year-old boy had been born with facial erythema and ents, 5-20 ng/mL). Care was taken to draw the blood from a scaly patch on his left wrist. During the first week of a site that had not been treated for 2 days before the phle- life, he had developed more widespread erythematous, botomy. One week later, a second 2-hour postdose drug polycyclic, and serpiginous plaques with migratory, hy- level was 19 ng/mL with the patient receiving the same perkeratotic, double-edged peripheral scaling. At birth, dose of medication. Despite these levels, his blood pres- he had had long dark hair, which fell out after a few weeks sure, serum electrolyte levels, glucose level, complete and was replaced by sparse, brittle hair. Infancy and child- blood cell count, serum urea nitrogen level, and serum hood had been complicated by frequent otitis media and creatinine level remained within normal limits. Subse- externa; allergies to spinach, peanuts, milk, and eggs; and quently, the drug was applied twice a week, only to the erythroderma. The patient was only minimally respon- most severely involved areas, the scalp and face. On this sive to numerous topical corticosteroid preparations and regimen, postapplication blood levels monitored at 2-day antihistamines. The diagnosis of Netherton syndrome had trough times were less than 1.5 ng/mL (lower limit of been confirmed at age 2 years, when trichorrhexis in- quantitation for the assay). vaginata was found on light microscopic examination of the patient’s hair. CASE 2 At age 3 years, the patient was deemed eligible for inclusion in a clinical trial of 0.1% tacrolimus ointment A 14-year-old girl presented with trichorrhexis invagi- twice daily for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (Fu- nata, short stature, patches of ichthyosis linearis circum- jisawa Healthcare, Inc, protocol 99-0-054). The proto- flexa, and widespread congenital erythroderma associ- col not did include monitoring of laboratory measures. ated with severe pruritus and elevated IgE level. Her An average of 3 g was spread over the body and scalp with dermatitis and pruritus had been treated long-term with each application. Baseline and follow-up blood pres- applications of 0.1% triamcinolone acetonide ointment sures remained within normal limits (measured with an since early infancy. During the preceding 5 years, her age-appropriate cuff, 80/50 mm Hg at baseline and 90/55 course had been complicated by recurrent staphylococ- mm Hg at his 6-month visit). The patient experienced cal and streptococcal skin infections, flares of her eryth- rapid improvement in his skin along with decreased pru- roderma, and poor growth, falling below the fifth per- ritus and slow regrowth of his hair. After 8 months of centile for age. At chronologic age 10 years 5 months, intermittent therapy (interrupted by two 2-week courses her bone age was 6 years 10 months, which was delayed of systemic corticosteroids), a blood level was obtained 2 SDs below the mean. Adrenocortical suppression was to monitor for systemic absorption. The level, 10.2 ng/ documented, with a low morning cortisol level of 13.8 mL, was determined 30 hours after the last application nmol/L (reference range, .118.6 nmol/L). She was sub- of medication from a site that had not been treated for sequently given a lower-potency topical corticosteroid 2 days before phlebotomy. Complete blood cell count, (fluocinolone oil [Derma-smoothe FS; Hill Dermaceuti- renal function, and hepatic function were normal. The cals, Inc, Sanford, Fla]) and growth hormone replace- patient’s parents elected to discontinue use. ment, resulting in a 6-cm growth spurt during 9 months. At age 12 years, she was treated with extemporane- COMMENT ously compounded 0.1% tacrolimus ointment applied to one leg twice a day for 1 month, resulting in marked im- Despite dramatic clinical improvement with topical ta- provement. For the next 6 months, she applied the com- crolimus in these 3 cases, the risk of systemic exposure pounded ointment to a larger area, with excellent re- from percutaneous absorption is a serious concern in sponse.
Recommended publications
  • SPIRONOLACTONE Spironolactone – Oral (Common Brand Name
    SPIRONOLACTONE Spironolactone – oral (common brand name: Aldactone) Uses: Spironolactone is used to treat high blood pressure. Lowering high blood pressure helps prevent strokes, heart attacks, and kidney problems. It is also used to treat swelling (edema) caused by certain conditions (e.g., congestive heart failure) by removing excess fluid and improving symptoms such as breathing problems. This medication is also used to treat low potassium levels and conditions in which the body is making too much of a natural chemical (aldosterone). Spironolactone is known as a “water pill” (potassium-sparing diuretic). Other uses: This medication has also been used to treat acne in women, female pattern hair loss, and excessive hair growth (hirsutism), especially in women with polycystic ovary disease. Side effects: Drowsiness, lightheadedness, stomach upset, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, or headache may occur. To minimize lightheadedness, get up slowly when rising from a seated or lying position. If any of these effects persist or worsen, notify your doctor promptly. Tell your doctor immediately if any of these unlikely but serious side effects occur; dizziness, increased thirst, change in the amount of urine, mental/mood chances, unusual fatigue/weakness, muscle spasms, menstrual period changes, sexual function problems. This medication may lead to high levels of potassium, especially in patients with kidney problems. If not treated, very high potassium levels can be fatal. Tell your doctor immediately if you notice any of the following unlikely but serious side effects: slow/irregular heartbeat, muscle weakness. Precautions: Before taking spironolactone, tell your doctor or pharmacist if you are allergic to it; or if you have any other allergies.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Tacrolimus: a New Agent for the Prevention of Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
    Bone Marrow Transplantation, (1998) 22, 217–225 1998 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0268–3369/98 $12.00 http://www.stockton-press.co.uk/bmt Review Tacrolimus: a new agent for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation P Jacobson1, J Uberti2, W Davis1 and V Ratanatharathorn2 1College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan; and 2Blood and Marrow Stem Cell Transplantation Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA Summary: One of the challenges to reduce the morbidity and mortality after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is to Tacrolimus (FK506) is a macrolide lactone with potent improve the treatment and prevention of graft-versus-host immunosuppressive activity 100 times that of cyclosporine disease (GVHD).1 Currently, most regimens for GVHD by weight. The molecular mechanism of action is mediated prophylaxis are centered on cyclosporine as the main via an inhibition of the phosphorylase activity of calcineurin immunosuppressant given in conjunction with various by drug–immunophilin complex, resulting in the inhibition doses and schedules of methotrexate and/or methylpredni- of IL-2 gene expression. There are emerging studies now solone.2–5 Most clinical trials suggested the superiority of showing significant efficacy of tacrolimus in GVHD preven- a combination of cyclosporine and a short course of metho- tion in both related and unrelated donor transplantation. trexate over either agent alone. Yet, acute GVHD still Three multicenter randomized studies comparing tacrol- developed in 9–33% of patients who received a marrow imus to cyclosporine have been completed, one each in graft from an HLA-matched sibling donor.3,4,6–9 related and unrelated donor transplantation; the remaining Tacrolimus is a new immunosuppressive agent intro- study involved both related and unrelated donor transplan- duced into clinical trials for the prevention of acute GVHD.
    [Show full text]
  • Labeling • CYP3A4 Inducers: Decreased Tacrolimus Concentrations; Monitor Revised: 12/2020 Concentrations and Adjust Tacrolimus Dose As Needed
    HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION Heart Transplant These highlights do not include all the information needed to use PROGRAF® safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for 1 0.3 mg/kg/day capsules or Month 1-12: 5-20 ng/mL PROGRAF. oral suspension, divided in two PROGRAF (tacrolimus) capsules, for oral use doses, every 12 hours PROGRAF (tacrolimus) injection, for intravenous use PROGRAF Granules (tacrolimus for oral suspension) MMF= Mycophenolate mofetil Initial U.S. Approval: 1994 1. 0.1 mg/kg/day if cell depleting induction treatment is WARNING: MALIGNANCIES AND SERIOUS INFECTIONS administered. See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. Increased risk for developing serious infections and malignancies • Intravenous (IV) use recommended for patients who cannot with PROGRAF or other immunosuppressants that may lead to tolerate oral formulations (capsules or suspension). (2.1, 2.2) hospitalization or death. (5.1, 5.2) • Administer capsules or suspension consistently with or without food. (2.1) -------------------------- RECENT MAJOR CHANGES -------------------------­ • Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended. (2.1, 2.6) Warnings and Precautions (5.11) xx/2020 • Avoid eating grapefruit or drinking grapefruit juice. (2.1) • See dosing adjustments for African-American patients (2.2), --------------------------- INDICATIONS AND USAGE -------------------------­ hepatic and renal impaired. (2.4, 2.5) PROGRAF is a calcineurin-inhibitor immunosuppressant indicated for the • For complete dosing information,
    [Show full text]
  • The Transplant Center Lowry Building 110 Francis Street Boston, MA 02215 Telephone: (617) 632-9700
    The Transplant Center Lowry Building 110 Francis Street Boston, MA 02215 Telephone: (617) 632-9700 Tacrolimus Medication Information What is tacrolimus? Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant that is in the class known as calcineurin inhibitors. This drug is used to suppress your immune system so your body does not reject your transplanted organ. Are there other names for tacrolimus? Yes, tacrolimus may be referred to by its brand name which is Prograf ® or by it’s shorter original name FK506 or even shorter FK. Is tacrolimus available in a generic formulation or any other formulation that I should be aware of? The generic formulation of tacrolimus is available as of August 12, 2009. It is anticipated the BIDMC in patient pharmacy will begin dispensing generic tacrolimus in early 2010. If you are started on generic tacrolimus when you are in the hospital and you are discharged on generic tacrolimus you will be followed regularly. If you are discharged from the hospital on brand name tacrolimus and you are later switched to generic tacrolimus by your pharmacy you must notify you transplant coordinator. After you switch to the generic tacrolimus we will need to monitor your tacrolimus level closely to ensure that you do not need a dose adjustment. You will be asked to have weekly tacrolimus troughs (level drawn 12 hours after your last dose) until your level remains stable. It is important that you do not switch between various tacrolimus products. This means that you can not switch between brand and generic and between various makers of generics. If you notice that your tacrolimus appearance has changed call your transplant coordinator immediately.
    [Show full text]
  • MECHANISMS in ENDOCRINOLOGY: Novel Genetic Causes of Short Stature
    J M Wit and others Genetics of short stature 174:4 R145–R173 Review MECHANISMS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY Novel genetic causes of short stature 1 1 2 2 Jan M Wit , Wilma Oostdijk , Monique Losekoot , Hermine A van Duyvenvoorde , Correspondence Claudia A L Ruivenkamp2 and Sarina G Kant2 should be addressed to J M Wit Departments of 1Paediatrics and 2Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, Email The Netherlands [email protected] Abstract The fast technological development, particularly single nucleotide polymorphism array, array-comparative genomic hybridization, and whole exome sequencing, has led to the discovery of many novel genetic causes of growth failure. In this review we discuss a selection of these, according to a diagnostic classification centred on the epiphyseal growth plate. We successively discuss disorders in hormone signalling, paracrine factors, matrix molecules, intracellular pathways, and fundamental cellular processes, followed by chromosomal aberrations including copy number variants (CNVs) and imprinting disorders associated with short stature. Many novel causes of GH deficiency (GHD) as part of combined pituitary hormone deficiency have been uncovered. The most frequent genetic causes of isolated GHD are GH1 and GHRHR defects, but several novel causes have recently been found, such as GHSR, RNPC3, and IFT172 mutations. Besides well-defined causes of GH insensitivity (GHR, STAT5B, IGFALS, IGF1 defects), disorders of NFkB signalling, STAT3 and IGF2 have recently been discovered. Heterozygous IGF1R defects are a relatively frequent cause of prenatal and postnatal growth retardation. TRHA mutations cause a syndromic form of short stature with elevated T3/T4 ratio. Disorders of signalling of various paracrine factors (FGFs, BMPs, WNTs, PTHrP/IHH, and CNP/NPR2) or genetic defects affecting cartilage extracellular matrix usually cause disproportionate short stature.
    [Show full text]
  • Guideline for Preoperative Medication Management
    Guideline: Preoperative Medication Management Guideline for Preoperative Medication Management Purpose of Guideline: To provide guidance to physicians, advanced practice providers (APPs), pharmacists, and nurses regarding medication management in the preoperative setting. Background: Appropriate perioperative medication management is essential to ensure positive surgical outcomes and prevent medication misadventures.1 Results from a prospective analysis of 1,025 patients admitted to a general surgical unit concluded that patients on at least one medication for a chronic disease are 2.7 times more likely to experience surgical complications compared with those not taking any medications. As the aging population requires more medication use and the availability of various nonprescription medications continues to increase, so does the risk of polypharmacy and the need for perioperative medication guidance.2 There are no well-designed trials to support evidence-based recommendations for perioperative medication management; however, general principles and best practice approaches are available. General considerations for perioperative medication management include a thorough medication history, understanding of the medication pharmacokinetics and potential for withdrawal symptoms, understanding the risks associated with the surgical procedure and the risks of medication discontinuation based on the intended indication. Clinical judgement must be exercised, especially if medication pharmacokinetics are not predictable or there are significant risks associated with inappropriate medication withdrawal (eg, tolerance) or continuation (eg, postsurgical infection).2 Clinical Assessment: Prior to instructing the patient on preoperative medication management, completion of a thorough medication history is recommended – including all information on prescription medications, over-the-counter medications, “as needed” medications, vitamins, supplements, and herbal medications. Allergies should also be verified and documented.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronic Diarrhea in an Adolescent Girl with a Genetic Skin Condition
    PHOTO CHALLENGE Chronic Diarrhea in an Adolescent Girl With a Genetic Skin Condition Lucia Liao, BS; Andrea Zaenglein, MD; Galen T. Foulke, MD A 17-year-old adolescent girl visited our clinic to establish care for her genetic skin condition. She exhibited red scaly plaques and patches over much of the body surface area consistent with atopic dermatitis but also had areas on the trunk with serpiginous red plaques with scale on the leading and trailingcopy edges. She also noted fragile hair with sparse eyebrows. The patient reported that she had experienced chronic diarrhea and abdominal pain since childhood. She asked if it couldnot be related to her genetic condition. WHAT’S THE DIAGNOSIS? a. dyskeratosis follicularis (Darier disease) b. elastosis perforans serpiginosa Doc. erythema marginatum d. Netherton syndrome e. subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus PLEASE TURN TO PAGE E19 FOR THE DIAGNOSIS CUTIS Ms. Liao is from Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey. Drs. Zaenglein and Foulke are from the Department of Dermatology, Pennsylvania State Medical Center, Hershey. Dr. Zaengelin also is from the Department of Pediatrics. The authors report no conflict of interest. Correspondence: Galen T. Foulke, MD, 500 University Dr HU14, Hershey, PA 17033 ([email protected]). E18 I CUTIS® WWW.MDEDGE.COM/DERMATOLOGY Copyright Cutis 2020. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted without the prior written permission of the Publisher. PHOTO CHALLENGE DISCUSSION THE DIAGNOSIS: Netherton Syndrome
    [Show full text]
  • Jp Xvii the Japanese Pharmacopoeia
    JP XVII THE JAPANESE PHARMACOPOEIA SEVENTEENTH EDITION Official from April 1, 2016 English Version THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH, LABOUR AND WELFARE Notice: This English Version of the Japanese Pharmacopoeia is published for the convenience of users unfamiliar with the Japanese language. When and if any discrepancy arises between the Japanese original and its English translation, the former is authentic. The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Ministerial Notification No. 64 Pursuant to Paragraph 1, Article 41 of the Law on Securing Quality, Efficacy and Safety of Products including Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices (Law No. 145, 1960), the Japanese Pharmacopoeia (Ministerial Notification No. 65, 2011), which has been established as follows*, shall be applied on April 1, 2016. However, in the case of drugs which are listed in the Pharmacopoeia (hereinafter referred to as ``previ- ous Pharmacopoeia'') [limited to those listed in the Japanese Pharmacopoeia whose standards are changed in accordance with this notification (hereinafter referred to as ``new Pharmacopoeia'')] and have been approved as of April 1, 2016 as prescribed under Paragraph 1, Article 14 of the same law [including drugs the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare specifies (the Ministry of Health and Welfare Ministerial Notification No. 104, 1994) as of March 31, 2016 as those exempted from marketing approval pursuant to Paragraph 1, Article 14 of the Same Law (hereinafter referred to as ``drugs exempted from approval'')], the Name and Standards established in the previous Pharmacopoeia (limited to part of the Name and Standards for the drugs concerned) may be accepted to conform to the Name and Standards established in the new Pharmacopoeia before and on September 30, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • CORPORATE PRESENTATION Q3 2020 Forward-Looking Statements
    Medicines for Rare Diseases – A Gene Therapy Company CORPORATE PRESENTATION Q3 2020 Forward-Looking Statements This presentation contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Any statements in this presentation about future expectations, plans and prospects for Krystal Biotech, Inc. (the “Company”), including but not limited to statements about the development of the Company’s product candidates, such as the future development or commercialization of B-VEC, KB105 and the Company’s other product candidates; conduct and timelines of clinical trials, the clinical utility of B-VEC, KB105 and the Company’s other product candidates; plans for and timing of the review of regulatory filings, efforts to bring B-VEC, KB105 and the Company’s other product candidates to market; the market opportunity for and the potential market acceptance of B-VEC, KB105 and the Company’s other product candidates, the development of B-VEC, KB105 and the Company’s other product candidates for additional indications; the development of additional formulations of B-VEC, KB105 and the Company’s other product candidates; plans to pursue research and development of other product candidates, the sufficiency of the Company’s existing cash resources; and other statements containing the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “predict,” “project,” “target,” “potential,” “likely,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “continue,” and similar expressions, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements as a result of various important factors, including: the content and timing of decisions made by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Formulary List of Covered Prescription Drugs
    2021 Formulary List of covered prescription drugs This drug list applies to all Individual HMO products and the following Small Group HMO products: Sharp Platinum 90 Performance HMO, Sharp Platinum 90 Performance HMO AI-AN, Sharp Platinum 90 Premier HMO, Sharp Platinum 90 Premier HMO AI-AN, Sharp Gold 80 Performance HMO, Sharp Gold 80 Performance HMO AI-AN, Sharp Gold 80 Premier HMO, Sharp Gold 80 Premier HMO AI-AN, Sharp Silver 70 Performance HMO, Sharp Silver 70 Performance HMO AI-AN, Sharp Silver 70 Premier HMO, Sharp Silver 70 Premier HMO AI-AN, Sharp Silver 73 Performance HMO, Sharp Silver 73 Premier HMO, Sharp Silver 87 Performance HMO, Sharp Silver 87 Premier HMO, Sharp Silver 94 Performance HMO, Sharp Silver 94 Premier HMO, Sharp Bronze 60 Performance HMO, Sharp Bronze 60 Performance HMO AI-AN, Sharp Bronze 60 Premier HDHP HMO, Sharp Bronze 60 Premier HDHP HMO AI-AN, Sharp Minimum Coverage Performance HMO, Sharp $0 Cost Share Performance HMO AI-AN, Sharp $0 Cost Share Premier HMO AI-AN, Sharp Silver 70 Off Exchange Performance HMO, Sharp Silver 70 Off Exchange Premier HMO, Sharp Performance Platinum 90 HMO 0/15 + Child Dental, Sharp Premier Platinum 90 HMO 0/20 + Child Dental, Sharp Performance Gold 80 HMO 350 /25 + Child Dental, Sharp Premier Gold 80 HMO 250/35 + Child Dental, Sharp Performance Silver 70 HMO 2250/50 + Child Dental, Sharp Premier Silver 70 HMO 2250/55 + Child Dental, Sharp Premier Silver 70 HDHP HMO 2500/20% + Child Dental, Sharp Performance Bronze 60 HMO 6300/65 + Child Dental, Sharp Premier Bronze 60 HDHP HMO
    [Show full text]
  • List Item Minutes of the PRAC Meeting 8-11 April 2013
    16 May 2013 EMA/PRAC/332071/2013 Corr. Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) Minutes of the meeting on 8-11 April 2013 Chair: June Raine – Vice-Chair: Almath Spooner Explanatory notes The notes give a brief explanation of relevant minutes items and should be read in conjunction with the minutes. EU Referral procedures for safety reasons: Urgent EU procedures and Other EU referral procedures (Items 2 and 3 of the PRAC agenda) A referral is a procedure used to resolve issues such as concerns over the safety or benefit-risk balance of a medicine or a class of medicines. In a referral, the EMA is requested to conduct a scientific assessment of a particular medicine or class of medicines on behalf of the European Union (EU). For further detailed information on safety-related referrals please see: http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/regulation/general/general_content_000150.jsp&mid =WC0b01ac05800240d0 Signals assessment and prioritisation (Item 4 of the PRAC Minutes) A safety signal is information on a new or incompletely documented adverse event that is potentially caused by a medicine and that warrants further investigation. Signals are generated from several sources such as reports of adverse events from healthcare professionals or patients (so called spontaneous reports), clinical studies and the scientific literature. The evaluation of safety signals is a routine part of pharmacovigilance and is essential to ensuring that regulatory authorities have a comprehensive knowledge of a medicine’s benefits and risks. The presence of a safety signal does not mean that a medicine has caused the reported adverse event.
    [Show full text]
  • ESID Registry – Working Definitions for Clinical Diagnosis of PID
    ESID Registry – Working Definitions for Clinical Diagnosis of PID These criteria are only for patients with no genetic diagnosis*. *Exceptions: Atypical SCID, DiGeorge syndrome – a known genetic defect and confirmation of criteria is mandatory Available entries (Please click on an entry to see the criteria.) Page Acquired angioedema .................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Agammaglobulinaemia ................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Asplenia syndrome (Ivemark syndrome) ................................................................................................................................... 4 Ataxia telangiectasia (ATM) ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Atypical Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (Atypical SCID) ............................................................................................... 5 Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS) ................................................................................................................ 5 APECED / APS1 with CMC - Autoimmune polyendocrinopathy candidiasis ectodermal dystrophy (APECED) .................. 5 Barth syndrome ...........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]