The Law of Desire

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Law of Desire Conclusion When Georges Bataille died in July 1962, there was never any doubt that a special issue of Critique, the journal he had founded in 1946, should be devoted to his memory and legacy. The issue eventually appeared as a double installment in August 1963, four months after Lacan’s ‘Kant with Sade’ had been published in Critique, and it featured tributes to the journal’s founder by some of France’s most renowned intelligentsia, including Roland Barthes, Maurice Blanchot, Pierre Klossowski, Michel Foucault and Michel Leiris. In his lengthy contribu- tion to the commemorative issue, Foucault paid homage to Bataille’s philosophical analyses of sexuality, eroticism and transgression, which prompted him to revisit the influence and impact of Sade on the development of a language and space for human desire. ‘How is it possible to discover, under all these different figures’, Foucault won- dered, ‘that form of thought we carelessly call “the philosophy of eroticism”, but in which it is important to recognize ...an essential experience for our culture since Kant and Sade—the experience of finitude and being, of the limit and transgression?’ (Foucault, 1977, p. 40). Given the fact that Lacan had recently devoted an entire essay to the not-quite-obvious link between Kant and Sade, and notably in the © The Author(s) 2017 141 D. Nobus, The Law of Desire, The Palgrave Lacan Series, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-55275-0 142 Conclusion same journal, one could have expected Foucault to engage with Lacan’s text, or at least to provide the reader with a reference to it, especially since Lacan himself had expressed his appreciation for Foucault’s work, in an act of intellectual generosity for which he was not particularly well- known. But Foucault remained silent about ‘Kant with Sade’. When, in 1965, Jean-Jacques Pauvert decided to extract ‘Français, encore un effort ...’ from La philosophie dans le boudoir, in order to release it as a separate volume, Blanchot accepted the task to write a new preface for it, in which he duly acknowledged the ‘profound reflections of both Georges Bataille and Pierre Klossowski’ (Blanchot, 1993, p. 219), yet without paying any attention to Lacan’s essay. Critique was sufficiently well-established for Blanchot to have known about the text, and given its central concern with Philosophy in the Boudoir, and the pamphlet within it, it is quite unlikely that Blanchot had not consulted it. Maybe he had decided to ignore it on account of the fact that Lacan himself had failed to mention Blanchot’s own previous work on Sade in it, despite his clearly having relied on it. Much like Foucault, Blanchot remained silent about ‘Kant with Sade’. Ayearafter‘Kant with Sade’ was included in Écrits, the French literary avant-garde journal Tel Quel devoted a special issue to ‘La pensée de Sade’ (Sade’s Thought), including some of the usual suspects (Klossowski, Barthes), alongside essays by the writer Phillippe Sollers, the philosopher Hubert Damisch and the psychoanalyst Michel Tort. The latter figure was broadly sympathetic to the Lacanian cause, and was an active participant in Lacan’s seminar. In his essay entitled ‘L’effet Sade’ (‘The Sade effect’)(Tort, 1967), he wrote extensively about the fantasy, without distinguishing—as Lacan had done—between Sade’s literary fantasy and that which would have ruled the Marquis’ life, and without showing any trace of a certain ‘Lacan effect’ on his own, distinctly psychoanalytic views. None of the other contributors to the special issue made a single mention of ‘Kant with Sade’ either. In 1967, Gilles Deleuze published a lengthy introduction to Leopold von Sacher-Masoch’s Venus in Furs, which was as much a study of Sade and sadism as it was an exploration of Sacher-Masoch and masochism (Deleuze, 1991). Deleuze relied on all the established French Sade-scholars (Klossowski, Bataille, Blanchot), and drew extensively on psychoanalytic concepts to argue in favour of a strict separation of sadism Conclusion 143 and masochism. In addition, he engaged with Kant’s conception of the categorical imperative in the Critique of Practical Reason,referredtothe theoretical disquisitions of Philosophy in the Boudoir, and analysed the moral principles underpinning Sade and Masoch’s(fictional) ideologies. Deleuze acknowledged Lacan for highlighting the significance of Freud’s concept of disavowal (Verleugnung), and for arguing that what has been excluded symbolically will return in the real (Deleuze, 1991, pp. 31 and 64), yet as to Lacan’sargumentsin‘Kant with Sade’, he merely pointed out, in a footnote, that Lacan had underscored in it the ‘elusive character of the object of the law’ (Deleuze, 1991, p. 137, note 26). In February 1968, a two-day conference on Sade was organized in Aix-en-Provence, which brought together a large gathering of literary critics, eighteenth-century scholars, philosophers and psychoanalysts. In his paper on the sadistic fantasy and reality, the psychoanalyst Jacques Caïn—amemberofthe Société Psychanalytique de Paris who was not at all attuned to Lacan’sideas —mentioned how Lacan had made an important contribution to the issue in question, yet there is no evidence that he had studied Lacan’spaper (Caïn, 1968, p. 283). When, in March 1970, Foucault gave a long lecture on Sade at the State University of New York in Buffalo, his choice of subject-matter (‘Why did Sade write?’ and the incessant alternation between ‘theoretical discourses’ and ‘erotic scenes’ in Sade’slibertine novels) prompted him to investigate the function of writing and the fantasy for connecting truth to desire. On occasion, Foucault’swordshadan unmistakable Lacanian ring to them, as when he asserted that ‘writing [in the case of Sade] serves as an intermediary element between the imaginary and the real’ (Foucault, 2015, p. 107), yet at no given point was Lacan mentioned by name, and his ‘Kant with Sade’ never explicitly appeared on Foucault’s radar. When, during the early 1970s, the Italian film director Pier Paolo Pasolini decided to adapt Sade’s The 120 Days of Sodom into a film, he reportedly ‘read everything [on Sade] that could be read’ (Brighelli, 2000, p. 276). Most unusual for a film, the end credits of Salò contained an ‘essential bibliography’ of five key texts, listed in alpha- betical order by the author’s surname: Barthes, Blanchot, de Beauvoir, Klossowski, Sollers. Sade-scholars no doubt deplored the absence of Bataille, Deleuze, Foucault, Paulhan, Heine and Lely, but did anyone deplore the absence of Lacan? 144 Conclusion On 29 October 1974, Lacan was in Rome for a conference of his École freudienne de Paris. Questioned by an Italian journalist about his pur- portedly Kantian concept of the real, he responded: ‘I have written only one thing about Kant, which is my short paper entitled “Kant with Sade”. To be quite frank, I make Kant into a flower of sadism [fleur sadique]. No one paid the slightest attention to that article. Some second-rate fellow commented on it somewhere, and I don’t even know if his commentary was ever published. But no one has ever sent me any remarks on that article. It is true that I am incomprehensible’ (Lacan, 2013a, p. 83). I am not quite sure who Lacan had in mind, here, when he referred to the ‘second-rate fellow’. Maybe he was thinking of the anonymous author of the Paraphrase de ‘Kant avec Sade’, which had indeed been published in 1970, notably in Lacan’s own journal Scilicet (NN, 1970). If so, the designation ‘second-rate’ was definitely justified, partly because the text was effectively no more than a loose paraphrase, written in so convoluted a style that Lacan’s own essay reverts back into ‘light reading’, partly because it only restated a very small portion of Lacan’s original essay. The only essay that was published during Lacan’s life-time in which the author explicitly engaged with ‘Kant with Sade’ is by Sollers (1977), yet his remarks only cover the last three sections of the text and do not address Lacan’s reading of Kant nor, for that matter, the two schemas, the complex dynamic between desire and the Law, and the problematic relationship between Sade (the man, the author) and his ‘Sadean fantasy’. As such, it is fair to say that throughout Lacan’s lifetime ‘Kant with Sade’ was completely ignored by Sade-scholars, philosophers and psychoanalysts alike. Maybe the Sade-scholars believed that Lacan was too much of a psychoanalyst and not enough of a literary critic to be taken seriously. Maybe the philosophers thought that Lacan was too much of a Sade-scholar and insufficiently versed in the Kantian tradition to be given credit for his work. Maybe the psychoanalysts felt that Lacan’s paper was too literary-philosophical, and lacking in concrete clinical applications to be given serious consideration. Maybe all of them agreed that ‘Kant with Sade’ was simply unreadable, either because this is what they had heard, or because this is what they had discovered through personal experience. And after all, Lacan himself had admitted that the text was incomprehensible ... Conclusion 145 Ignored and neglected by one and all, ‘Kant with Sade’ nonetheless received a great deal of attention by Lacan himself, more in fact than most of his other essays in Écrits.Afteritsfirst publication in April 1963, Lacan returned to ‘Kant with Sade’ on a regular basis in his seminars, not only in the context of his yearlong seminar on The Logic of the Fantasy (Lacan, 1966–67), but equally in further elaborations of his theory of desire, and in advanced conceptual developments of the inter-relations between jouissance,desireandtruth.‘As to “Kant with Sade”,I’ve written things that are actually pretty good’, he admitted to his audience in March 1974, ‘things no one evidently understands ...’ (Lacan, 1973–74, session of 19 March 1974).
Recommended publications
  • Teaching Plato in Palestine: Philosophy in a Divided World
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. 1 TEACHING PLATO IN PALESTINE Can philosophy save the Middle East? It can. This, at least, is the thesis of Sari Nusseibeh as I learn from a friend upon arriving in Israel in February 2006. Nusseibeh is not only a prominent Palestinian intellectual and the Palestinian Liberation Organization’s former chief repre- sentative in Jerusalem, but also a philosopher by training (and, I think, by nature, too). “Only philosophy,” the friend tells me he argued during the Shlomo Pines memorial lec- ture in West Jerusalem three years before (aptly titled “On the Relevance of Philosophy in the Arab World Today”). By the time I leave Israel, I’m convinced that he’s on to something. I am here to teach a seminar at Al-Quds University, the Palestinian university in Jerusalem, together with Nus- seibeh, who has been president of Al- Quds since 1995. My idea is to discuss Plato’s political thought with the students and then examine how medieval Muslim and Jewish philosophers built on this thought to interpret Islam and Judaism as philosophical religions. I hope to raise some basic questions about philosophy and its rela- For general queries, contact [email protected] Fraenkel.indb 3 2/17/2015 8:56:12 AM © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanism: the Road from Athens to Jerusalem by DONNALYNN HESS
    Humanism: The Road From Athens to Jerusalem BY DONNALYNN HESS Over the past 30 years numerous Christian leaders have legitimately decried particular evils spawned by secular humanism; few, however, have provided a thoughtful analysis of how this philosophic system has been interwoven into God’s eternal plan. Viewing humanism in the context of sovereignty reveals that this recurring movement is not only a vivid record of fallen man’s impotence but also a divine roadmap that can be used to lead men to the cross. It is, therefore, valuable to reflect upon the significance of the historic signposts God has given. Such reflection can awaken a profound awe of God’s wisdom and compassion; it can also help believers discern (like Paul) how to guide “Athenians” from Mars Hill to Jerusalem. In the preface to Humanist Manifestos I and II (1973), Kurtz noted that “Humanism is a philosophical, religious, and moral point of view as old as human civilization itself” (p. 3). Although the thread of humanism does indeed run throughout the development of civilizations, there are specific reference points that are particularly helpful in discerning its impact on the western world. These reference points include the Greco-Roman period, the Renaissance, and the dawn of the modern age (20th century). Classical Humanism: A Precursor to the Incarnation The most important of the three epochs is the Greco-Roman period, for during this era the key tenets of humanism were formed. To fully understand the movement’s origin we must begin not with Socrates but with Thales, the pre-Socratic philosopher born in Miletos around 640 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Rated Equis: American Reactions to the Films of Pedro Almodóvar
    Rated Equis: American Reactions to the Films of Pedro Almodóvar Honors College Thesis Catherine Wheeler Advisor: Tina Escaja Spanish Department University of Vermont Introduction Sweet heart of mine suddenly attacked. All for loving more than the permissible. All because a cigar sits in a mouth And dampens in its succulent silks. Because a provocative T-shirt points out On his chest, the sculpted shield, And a vigorous arm peeks from the smallest sleeve. All because some legs, some perfect legs, In the tightest pants, separate in front of me. They separate. -Ana Rossetti, “Chico Wrangler” (Translated Catherine Wheeler) Pedro Almodóvar, now the world’s most celebrated Spanish film director since Luis Buñuel, has been hailed as the poster boy for the Madrid movida, an “anything goes” cultural movement that immediately followed the death of Francisco Franco in 1975. The movida has been called an attempt to unify all people regardless of birthplace, politics, economics, and sexual identity, while in practice it pertained mostly to the middle and upper classes. After nearly forty years of extreme conservatism under Franco’s regime, the youth of Madrid reacted to its newfound creative and sexual liberty with unparalleled gusto. The movida emphasized a reversal of traditional gender roles, sexual experimentation, and drug use. By its end in the mid 1980s, politicians had embraced the movida as Madrid’s new, post-fascism identity (Stapell). This political institutionalization of an originally pseudo anarchistic movement signified the death of the period of extreme self-liberation. The movida petered out by the mid 1980s, largely due to the spread of AIDS and movida members’ rampant drug use.
    [Show full text]
  • The March in Glasgow
    FOit.A · ·BALANCED University of Edinburgh,-Old College South Bridge, Edinburgh 'EHB 9YL vmw Tal: 031-6671011 ext4308 18 November-16 December GET .ALBERT IRVIN Paintings 1959-1989 ~*;£~-- Tues-Sat 10 am-5 pm Admission Free Subsidised by the Scottish Arts Council DAILY G~as~ow Herald _ of the Year y 30rd november 1 RUGBY BACK TO THE. 1st XV FUTUREII s:enttpacking problems of iii Peffenrtill time~ travel~ ·>... page8 .page 1 • I • arc STUDENTS from all over Park just after 2 pm, and con­ tinued to do so for nearly an hour, the United Kingdom assem­ with the rally properly beginning bled in Qlasgow on Tuesday around 2.15 pm. to take part in what was prob­ Three common themes were ably the biggest ever student addressed by the ten public demonstration on the British figures at the rally in the Park: mainland. these were the discriminatory nature of student loans; the com­ The march organised by the mitment by all to student grants, National Union of Students and the solidarity of support given against the Government's prop­ by them to students. osed introduction of top-up loans, The first four speakers addres­ was deemed by Strathclyde Police ·sed the rally from the semi-circu­ to have attracted around 20,00 lar, covered platform as students people. still marched in through the gates. Certainly, spirits were high All four- Mike Watson , Labour despite the cold and damp dismal MP for Glasgow Central ; Archy weather. It is likely this was a fac­ Kirkwood, Liberal Demcorat tor in preventing a larger turn­ MP; Diana Warwick, .
    [Show full text]
  • Fiestas and Fervor: Religious Life and Catholic Enlightenment in the Diocese of Barcelona, 1766-1775
    FIESTAS AND FERVOR: RELIGIOUS LIFE AND CATHOLIC ENLIGHTENMENT IN THE DIOCESE OF BARCELONA, 1766-1775 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Andrea J. Smidt, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2006 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Dale K. Van Kley, Adviser Professor N. Geoffrey Parker Professor Kenneth J. Andrien ____________________ Adviser History Graduate Program ABSTRACT The Enlightenment, or the "Age of Reason," had a profound impact on eighteenth-century Europe, especially on its religion, producing both outright atheism and powerful movements of religious reform within the Church. The former—culminating in the French Revolution—has attracted many scholars; the latter has been relatively neglected. By looking at "enlightened" attempts to reform popular religious practices in Spain, my project examines the religious fervor of people whose story usually escapes historical attention. "Fiestas and Fervor" reveals the capacity of the Enlightenment to reform the Catholicism of ordinary Spaniards, examining how enlightened or Reform Catholicism affected popular piety in the diocese of Barcelona. This study focuses on the efforts of an exceptional figure of Reform Catholicism and Enlightenment Spain—Josep Climent i Avinent, Bishop of Barcelona from 1766- 1775. The program of “Enlightenment” as sponsored by the Spanish monarchy was one that did not question the Catholic faith and that championed economic progress and the advancement of the sciences, primarily benefiting the elite of Spanish society. In this context, Climent is noteworthy not only because his idea of “Catholic Enlightenment” opposed that sponsored by the Spanish monarchy but also because his was one that implicitly condemned the present hierarchy of the Catholic Church and explicitly ii advocated popular enlightenment and the creation of a more independent “public sphere” in Spain by means of increased literacy and education of the masses.
    [Show full text]
  • Moses Mendelssohn's Subjectivity and The
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Columbia University Academic Commons HOW TO BELIEVE IN NOTHING: MOSES MENDELSSOHN'S SUBJECTIVITY AND THE EMPTY CORE OF TRADITION Yuval Kremnitzer Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2017 © 2017 Yuval Kremnitzer All rights reserved Abstract How to Believe in Nothing: Moses Mendelssohn’s Subjectivity and the Empty Core of Tradition Yuval Kremnitzer The purpose of this study is twofold. Firstly, it aims to illuminate key aspects of the work of Moses Mendelssohn (1729-1786), the ‘Father of Jewish Enlightenment,’ in particular, his well-known, and universally rejected, theory of Judaism. Secondly, it brings Mendelssohn’s ideas and insights to bear on the problem of Nihilism, a problem in the development of which Mendelssohn is usually considered to have played a merely incidental role. It is argued that these two domains, seemingly worlds apart, are mutually illuminating. Moses Mendelssohn enters our history books in two separate contexts, which seem to have nothing in common. In the context of ‘Jewish Studies,’ Mendelssohn is best known for his idiosyncratic view of Judaism as a religion devoid of any principles of belief, and for his confidence in its compatibility with reason – positions developed in his Jerusalem: Or, On Religious Power and Judaism (1783). In the history of philosophy, Mendelssohn is known as the last representative of the dogmatic Leibniz-Wolff School, rendered obsolete by Kant’s critical, transcendental turn.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Cite Complete Issue More Information About This Article
    Vivat Academia ISSN: 1575-2844 Forum XXI Durán-Manso, Valeriano LOS RASGOS MELODRAMÁTICOS DE TENNESSEE WILLIAMS EN PEDRO ALMODÓVAR: ESTUDIO DE PERSONAJES DE LA LEY DEL DESEO, TACONES LEJANOS Y LA FLOR DE MI SECRETO Vivat Academia, no. 138, 2017, March-June, pp. 96-119 Forum XXI DOI: https://doi.org/doi.org/10.15178/va.2017.138.96-119 Available in: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=525754430006 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Vivat Academia Revista de Comunicación · 15 Marzo-15 Junio 2017 · Nº 138 ISSN: 1575-2844 · pp 96-119 · http://dx.doi.org/10.15178/va.2017.138.96-119 RESEARCH Recibido: 11/06/2016 --- Aceptado: 04/12/2016 --- Publicado: 15/03/2017 THE MELODRAMATIC TRAITS OF TENNESSEE WILLIAMS IN PEDRO ALMODÓVAR: STUDY OF CHARACTERS OF THE LAW OF DESIRE, HIGH HEELS AND THE FLOWER OF MY SECRET Valeriano Durán Manso1: University of Cádiz, Spain. [email protected] ABSTRACT The main film adaptations of the literary production of the American playwright Tennessee Williams premiered in 1950 through 1968, and they settled in the melodrama. These films contributed to the thematic evolution of Hollywood due to the gradual dissolution of the Hays Code of censorship and, furthermore, they determined the path of this genre toward more passionate and sordid aspects. Thus, A Streetcar Named Desire, Cat on a Hot Tin Roof, or Suddenly, Last Summer incorporated sexual or psychological issues through tormented characters that had not been previously dealt with in the cinema.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reconsideration of Montesquieu's Liberal
    ABSTRACT A RECONSIDERATION OF MONTESQUIEU’S LIBERAL PACIFISM James Boesen, PhD Department of Political Science Northern Illinois University, 2017 Andrea Radasanu, Director Liberal international relations scholars have posited that liberalism promotes peaceful relations amongst states. These scholars utilize the writings of Montesquieu, most notably Spirit of the Laws, as the philosophic foundation for their liberal peace theory. My dissertation challenges this conventional understanding of Montesquieu. I contend that Montesquieu’s liberalism does not bind nations together in peace but instead pushes liberal states to engage in expansionary and imperial behavior. Mores rooted in commerce and liberty inclines liberal state to be in contention with other states and push its interests across the globe. This will lead the liberal states to push their liberalism into countries which opposes these liberal mores, leading to the forced imposition of the liberal order on previous illiberal people. Furthermore, I challenge the notion that the liberal peace theory is even a theory of peace. It suffers from the same expansionary behavior and insensitivity to local contexts that we find in Montesquieu’s liberalism. Although Montesquieu and liberal peace scholars have strong oppositions to the project of empire they still advocate for a liberal ideology that inevitably leads to said empire. NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY DE KALB, ILLINOIS DECEMBER 2017 A RECONSIDERATION OF MONTESQUIEU’S LIBERAL PACIFISM BY JAMES BOESEN ©2017 James Boesen A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF POLITITCAL SCIENCE Doctoral Director: Andrea Radasanu DEDICATION To my brother Brad Boesen for inspiring in me a love of politics and my mentor Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Auditing Israeli Democracy – 2005 a Decade After the Assassination of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin Asher Arian, Shlomit Barnea
    Auditing Israeli Democracy – 2005 A Decade after the Assassination of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin Asher Arian, Shlomit Barnea, Pazit Ben-Nun, Raphael Ventura, Michal Shamir The Israel Democracy Institute is an independent body that assists the Knesset and its committees, government offices and institutions, local government bodies, and political parties, through studies and proposals designed to bring about changes and reforms in their manner of operation. In addition, the Israel Democracy Institute fulfills its public charge through the presentation of comparative information on legislative topics and the various ways in which democratic regimes function. It also strives to enrich public discourse and encourage new ways of thinking through the initiation of discussion on topics of current political, social and economic interest, both by bringing together legislators, administrators and academics and through the publication of research findings. The Guttman Center was established at The Israel Democracy Institute in 1998 with the transfer of The Guttman Institute for Applied Social Research to the IDI. Formed in 1949 by Professor Louis Guttman, The Guttman Institute was the pioneer of public opinion research and advances in social science methodology in Israel. The goal of The Guttman Center is to enrich research projects at the IDI and discussions of public policy with data-based information and analyses. Editor-in-Chief Uri Dromi Publishing Director Edna Granit Library Editor Yael Mosheiff Content and Hebrew Language Editor Carmit Gai Linguistic Editor (Hebrew) Ronit Tapiero Translator Batya Stein English Editor Asher Weill Copy Editor Naomi Shmueli Production Coordinator Nadav Shtechman Design Ron Haran Printed in Jerusalem, by Art Plus, Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Voltaire's Convincement
    Quaker Studies Volume 4 Issue 1 Article 2 1999 Voltaire's Convincement Raymond Ayoub Penn State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/quakerstudies Part of the Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, and the History of Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Ayoub, Raymond (1999) "Voltaire's Convincement," Quaker Studies: Vol. 4 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/quakerstudies/vol4/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Quaker Studies by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Quaker Studies 4 (1999):1-20 -------- 'On beauty, in the Creation and in the mind.' Th e Yorkshireman 4 (1835): 79-80. Hutchinson, H. Jo nathan Hutchinson. Life and Letters. London: Heinemann Medical, 1946. Miller, J.F. 'Micrometrical measurements of the binary star� Ursre Majoris, and the double star Struve 1263, made at the Observatory, Voltaire's Convincement Whitehaven.' Mo nthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 12 (1851-2): 170. Raymond Ayoub Newman, T.P. Memoir of Life of Edward Newman [1876]. London: FaringdonClassey, 1980. Penn State University Noblett, W. 'William Curtis's botanical library.' Th e Library 9 (1987): 1-22. Penn, W. Some Fruits of Solitude [1693]. London: Constable, 1926 Quaker Studies 4 (1999):21-56 Raistrick, A. Quakers in Science and Industry. Newton Abbot: David & Charles, 1968. Abstract Richardson, J. A Sp eech Delivered at a Meeting of the Literary Association, The aim of this essay is to trace theevolution of Voltaire's perspective Sunderland, 30th of 9th Mo nth, 1819; Containing many Useful toward Quakers and Quakerism during the course of his life.
    [Show full text]
  • 18. Thinking (America) After Cavell: on Learning and Becoming Different
    CONVERSATIONS 7 18. Thinking (America) After Cavell: On Learning and Becoming Different ALONSO GAMARRA I read Stanley Cavell’s This New Yet Unapproachable America1 for the first time over a two-day bus ride from Montreal to Chicago. This happened a little bit more than a year ago, in March 2018, when I came back to the US, where I grew up undocumented. The following essay tries to respond to that reading from both a deep attach- ment to Cavell’s writing and a wish to learn how to think after his picture of American thinking. Alternatively, I can also say that this essay is an attempt at sitting with an ir- resolvable pull between the unapproachability of things, and the need of confronting the world with itself along the lines in which it meets in a series of topics and a place.2 The first of this essay’s two points of departure is a concern with the fate of philosophy in America. In “Finding as Founding,” Cavell introduces philosophy as the work of lasting in one’s receptivity and responsiveness to a changing world by both maintaining an orien- tation and recovering some way to go on3 when faced with a “loss of foundation.”4 Thus, philosophy can be seen as a continuous search for ground, or for the conditions in which getting from one place to another becomes possible, which includes the philo- sopher’s desires to go on in a particular way. The action of walking offers a way of ima- gining this understanding of philosophy, as a matter “of enduring as on a track” and “following on,” which includes taking successive steps as much as falling, sitting, lea- ping, and changing directions, and so turning from a given path.5 As an aversive suc- 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The French Revolution
    The French Revolution ‘This is more than a history of the French Revolution. It covers all Europe during the revolutionary period, though events in France naturally take first place. It is particularly good on the social and intellectual back- ground. Surprisingly enough, considering that Lefebvre was primarily an economic historian, it also breaks new ground in its account of international relations, and sets the wars of intervention in their true light. The French have a taste for what they call works of synthesis, great general summaries of received knowledge. We might call them textbooks, though of the highest level. At any rate, in its class, whether synthesis or textbook, this is one of the best ever produced.’ A. J. P. Taylor Georges Lefebvre The French Revolution From its origins to 1793 Translated by Elizabeth Moss Evanson With a foreword by Paul H. Beik London and New York La Révolution française was first published in 1930 by Presses Universitaires de France. A new, entirely rewritten, version was published in 1951. The present work is a translation of the first three parts of the revised edition of 1957. First published in the United Kingdom 1962 by Routledge and Kegan Paul First published in Routledge Classics 2001 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” © 1962 Columbia University Press All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]