DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report Academic Year 2015-2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report Academic Year 2015-2016 Annual Report Academic Year 2015-2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY An interdisciplinary, University-wide center with a global scope, the Berkman Center has continued its unparalleled track record of leveraging exceptional academic rigor to produce real world impact during the 2015-2016 academic year. In last year’s Annual Report, we recognized how the Berkman Center has catalyzed dozens of projects and initiatives concerning the Internet in law and policy, education and public discourse, and access to information. This year, we have continued to push the edges of scholarly research, build tools and platforms that break new ground, facilitate new ways of learning both within the classroom and beyond, and foster active networks across diverse communities. Updates and significant milestones related to each of these thematic areas are described in the following sections of the Executive Summary. We build. We continued our method of learning by building, continuing to design, code, and construct. Our in-house team of developers help us translate research into action, converting raw ideas into practical tools and platforms. Specifically, this year the Berkman Center has shined in building tools that preserve and monitor access to information. One major project, Internet Monitor, aims to evaluate, describe, and summarize the means, mechanisms, and extent of Internet content controls and Internet activity around the world. In Fall 2015 at the World Economic Forum in Geneva, we launched the Internet Monitor Dashboard, a freely accessible tool that aims to improve information for policymakers, researchers, advocates, and user communities working to shape the future of the Internet by helping them understand trends in Internet health and activity through data analysis and visualization. In the nine months since it launched, more than 13,000 people have accessed the dashboard. 1 In November 2015 we announced exciting developments for our pioneering Chilling Effects project, including new international partnerships and a name change to “Lumen.” Launched 15 years ago, the Lumen database is the definitive source for worldwide requests to remove content from the Internet; it currently hosts approximately four million notices submitted from companies such as Google, Twitter, and Wikipedia, referencing more than 1.9 billion URLs. On average, more than one million people from more than 190 countries visit the database every month. In January 2016 we released Amber, a free open source tool that preserves content and prevents broken links, to the public after months of beta testing. Within six months the software had been downloaded over 1,500 times. When installed on a blog or website, Amber can take a snapshot of the content of every linked page, ensuring that even if those pages are interfered with or blocked, the original content will be available. Amber extends the mission of Perma, a project of the Library Innovation Lab at the Harvard Law School Library that helps scholars, courts, and others create web citation links that will never break. More than 300 universities, libraries, and organizations have contributed more than 100,000 cited resources to the Perma service, which was honored with a Webby award in 2015. We study. We have continued to leverage research, expertise, and convening power to deeply and practically study hot-button issues and understand them in their structural context. Our entrepreneurial spirit this year has inspired us to pioneer new areas of study and seek to understand the complex topics of encryption, financial and Internet governance, and municipal Internet access. As part of the Berklett Cybersecurity project, we have informed the encryption debate. Launched in 2015, this project convenes a diverse group of experts from academia, civil society, and the US intelligence community to explore and evaluate the roles and responsibilities of the US government in promoting cybersecurity. To date, the project has convened six meetings and published an influential report, “Don’t Panic: Making Progress on the ‘Going Dark’ Debate,” which distilled the group’s conversations on the claims and questions around the FBI sounding alarms that the surveillance landscape is “going dark” due to the introduction of strong encryption and other warrant-proof technologies into mainstream consumer products. The report, which received widespread media attention and has been downloaded more than 100,000 times, has generated multiple interactions with law enforcement officials, key White House staff, elected officials on the Hill, and leaders of intelligence agencies abroad. The report continues to play a role as the broader discussion continues. The recently launched Digital Finance Initiative explores the legal and social impact of interoperable digital platforms for finance and property rights, including greater access for ordinary individuals to financial services and economic governance. It aims to help create transparency in the regulatory systems that govern finance and property, provide clarity, and offer guidance where there are gaps in our legal and social systems. Through knowledge-sharing workshops and discussions, the project fosters connections and collaborations that contribute to the Digital Knowledge Base, a curated database currently in development, to track scholarship, legislation, and regulatory activity in the shared ledger and digital finance communities. In March 2016, the Berkman Center was asked by the National Telecommunications & Information Administration of the United States Department of Commerce (NTIA) to serve on 2 an independent expert panel to conduct a thorough review and assessment of Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)’s CCWG Accountability Recommendations in order to determine the extent to which they comply with good governance principles. The review is part of ICANN’s transition of key Internet domain name functions stewardship to the global stakeholder community. We are pleased to have completed this report, which will be released in July 2016, together with NTIA’s broader report about the transition. Our Municipal Fiber Initiative is also working to help municipalities—initially in Massachusetts, where very few municipalities have tried to provide Internet access—understand and seize opportunities in sensible, incremental ways. The project aims to document the experiences of municipalities, convene municipal leaders for information sharing, and catalyze sensible regional efforts in the public interest. Since its launch in 2015, the project has released three case studies, the most recent of which, “WiredWest: Cooperative of Municipalities Forms to Build a Fiber Optic Network,” was covered by regional media including the Boston Globe and WBUR. Among other things, the study looks at why many towns still lack high-speed Internet access, despite a government-funded fiber optic network aimed at bringing broadband to places the private sector has avoided. We educate. We have continued our dedication to education, facilitating new ways of learning both inside and outside the classroom. Not only have our faculty and affiliates taught and mentored across the University and beyond the gates of Harvard, we have continued to build platforms to facilitate new ways of learning. The Digital Problem-Solving Initiative (DPSI) is an innovative, collaborative project, supported by the Dean of Harvard Law School and the President of Harvard University, that brings together students from Harvard College, faculty, fellows, and staff to work on projects that address challenges and opportunities across Harvard University. DPSI offers participants a novel opportunity to engage with research, design, and policy relating to the digital world. This spring, more than 120 people participated in a series of six interactive workshops that DPSI hosted on topics such as online harassment and privacy, data visualization, and how to attract more people to computer science. The Center is also home to Harvard Law School’s Cyberlaw Clinic, which provides pro-bono legal services to appropriate clients on issues relating to the Internet, technology, and intellectual property. During the past year, nearly 60 students enhanced their preparation for high-tech practice and earned course credit by working on real-world litigation, client counseling, advocacy, and transactional licensing projects and cases. The Clinic strives to help clients achieve success in their activities online, mindful of (and in response to) existing law, and works with clients to shape the law’s development through policy and advocacy efforts. Recently, the Clinic contributed to comments related to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) safe harbor provisions, copyright’s anti-circumvention law, and drone registration requirements, as well as amicus briefs in cases dealing with topics such as the extraterritorial scope of the Fourth Amendment, First Amendment protections for those who post so-called “ballot selfies,” and copyright in standards and legal codes. CopyrightX is a hybrid, networked course that explores the current law of copyright through a combination of recorded lectures, assigned readings, weekly seminars, live interactive webcasts, and online discussions. Launched in 2013, the course is made up of online sections, affiliated 3 courses, and the Harvard Law School Copyright course. Harvard students serve as teaching fellows for the online sections, and lead their students in weekly realtime seminars and discussion in online forums
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report Academic Year 2014-2015
    Annual Report Academic Year 2014-2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Last year’s 2013-2014 Berkman Center Annual Report outlined ideals to guide our work this academic year. Specifically, we sought to continue pioneering teaching and research with new, more sophisticated, and more integrative methodologies and partnerships. In the year that followed, the Center’s portfolio can be viewed in terms of three key areas of increased investment and attention that encompass these same goals. Since 1997, the Berkman Center has catalyzed dozens of projects and initiatives concerning the Internet in three areas of activity: 1) Law and Policy, 2) Education and Public Discourse, and 3) Access to Information. Updates and significant milestones related to each of these areas are described in the following sections of the Executive Summary. In additional to these three focal areas, the Berkman Center has continued to expand its collaboration across institutions and taken a leadership role in building a global research network through collaboration on projects and events. The Center also completed a rigorous revisioning and reimplementation of its organizational processes. Across and within the three areas of activity, platforms, privacy, and public discourse were at the core contexts of many of the Center’s activities in the past year, which were addressed and explored in its scholarship, technical innovations, collaborations, and communications. Platforms include the unowned Internet and World Wide Web itself along with organizations and companies that serve as conduits for online communications. Companies that offer network access (like ISPs) and online services (like cloud storage, email platforms, and social networks), and even government institutions that filter or moderate citizens’ access to content online, play a crucial role in intermediating online communications among individuals connected to the Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • The Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society
    Annual Report Academic Year 2016–2017 Contents I. Part One: Report of Activities .............................................................................................. 3 A. Summary of Academic Year: 2016–2017 ........................................................................ 3 1. Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... 3 2. Research, Scholarship and Project Activities ............................................................... 5 3. Contributions to HLS Teaching Program .....................................................................63 4. Participation of HLS Students in Program Activities ....................................................65 5. Faculty Participation ....................................................................................................65 6. Other Contributions to the HLS Community ................................................................66 7. Law Reform and Advocacy .........................................................................................66 8. Connections to the Profession ....................................................................................67 Research ...........................................................................................................................67 The Future of Digital Privacy ..............................................................................................67 Executive Education: Digital Security for Directors and Senior Executives
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report for Academic Year 2008-2009
    Annual Report for Academic Year 2008-2009 Executive Summary As with other academic organizations at Harvard and beyond, the Berkman Center was deeply affected by the financial crisis. We adjusted to the challenging financial context by evaluating our core structure and functioning, streamlining our activities, tightening our budget, and intensifying our fundraising efforts. We sought to develop new efficiencies and partnerships to ameliorate the effects of the crisis and to produce the very best scholarship with impact. The 2008-2009 academic year built upon the momentum of Berkman@10, the Center’s tenth anniversary celebration and an inflection point in our evolution. This year saw Berkman step into its future as a University-wide and collaborative organization, with a focus on institution- building efforts, including reorganizing our fellows program, strengthening our core team’s integration with projects, and fundraising aggressively. These activities are foundational to our efforts to create multidisciplinary collaborations in support of substantial new methodologies and research, and the teaching and engagement they inform. A leadership change In January, longtime Berkman partner and Faculty Fellow Urs Gasser (formerly a professor of law at the University of St. Gallen in Switzerland) started in his new role as Executive Director, replacing John Palfrey, who was appointed Vice Dean, Library and Information Resources, at Harvard Law School in 2008. In active partnership with the Center’s steering committee and staff, Urs Gasser led the creation of a long-term strategic plan focused on our core functioning and response to the financial crisis. John Palfrey remains deeply involved as a faculty co-director and principal investigator, bringing us closer to the HLS library and to the rest of the University through his service on the Provost’s Committee on Social Science and other activities spanning Harvard.
    [Show full text]
  • Harvard Law Library Project: Librarycloud: an Open Metadata Server
    Nominee: Harvard Law Library Project: LibraryCloud: An Open Metadata Server Stanford Prize for Innovation in Research Libraries (SPIRL) Entry Nominator: Jonathan Zittrain, Vice Dean for Library and Information Resources, Harvard Law School; Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and the Harvard Kennedy School of Government; Professor of Computer Science at the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences; Co-founder of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society. Nominator’s Statement I am pleased to nominate LibraryCloud (http://librarycloud.harvard.edu) for the Stanford Prize for Innovation in Research Libraries. Libraries know far more than they’ve been able to make usable so far. For example, they can now see how the ideas in their materials are being discussed and appropriated, for many of those discussions are now done in the networked public. They also have rich usage metadata, much of which can be anonymized. They know which works have been put on reserve for courses and could know which ones are mentioned in syllabi in their own institution and institutions worldwide. Libraries thus can be far more involved in the development of the ideas and knowledge that their resources and services support. LibraryCloud is an open metadata server that enables libraries to make available to developers more of what libraries and their communities know. The aim is to enable and encourage libraries and unaffiliated developers to create applications that are highly useful to specific groups of users, and to make it easier for other sites to integrate library-based knowledge. LibraryCloud is designed to support a “virtuous circle” of metadata out to and back from a community.
    [Show full text]
  • Internet & Politics
    Internet 2008& Politics MOVING December 10 & 11 PEOPLE MOVING IDEAS Sponsored by: ��������������������� Berkman Center for Internet & Society | Internet & Politics 2008 Design & Layout: Monica Katzenell www.mkdesignrocks.com Berkman Center for Internet & Society | Internet & Politics 2008 INTRODUCTION Internet technologies—whether deployed to entice voters, raise money, recruit and organize campaign workers, or coax voters to the polls—now infuse every step of the electoral process. This year’s edition of Internet & Politics, Moving People, Moving Ideas, will examine how digital technologies reshape the practice of campaigning and the movement of political information. We are bringing together an exceptional group of participants from various constituencies working at the intersection of technology and politics: campaign strategists, political activists and organizers, independent analysts, members of the media, academics, students, and more. Our goal is to meld theory, data, and practice, synthesizing diverse perspectives and experiences in order to facilitate learning and collaboration. In doing so, we will draw upon the unique expertise of the Berkman Center community, the Harvard University Institute of Politics, and the accomplished group of conference participants. Have digital information and communications tools enhanced critical elements of political strategy, such as leadership formation, community-building, and coordinated action? Are digital technologies influencing offline actions (for example, the ways campaigns contact
    [Show full text]
  • Blogging, Journalism & Credibility
    BLOGGING, JOURNALISM & CREDIBILITY: Battleground and Common Ground A conference January 21-22, 2005 at Harvard University Sponsored by: The Berkman Center for Internet & Society (Harvard Law School) The Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics & Public Policy (Harvard Kennedy School of Government) and Office of Information Technology Policy, American Library Association. Report written and compiled by: Rebecca MacKinnon 1 Contents: 1. Executive Summary…………………………………………………………….. 3 2. The Idea…………………………………………………………………………. 6 3. The Blogosphere’s Reaction and Pre-Conference Debates………………….. 7 4. The Conference………………………………………………………………... 11 5. SESSION 1: Jay Rosen: “Bloggers vs. Journalists” is over……………….... 11 6. SESSION 2 (lunch): Judith Donath: Online social behavior and the implications for news………………………………………………………….. 19 7. SESSION 3: Bill Mitchell on the ethics of journalism and blogging………. 21 8. SESSION 4: Jeff Jarvis: The business model…………………………………25 9. SESSION 5 (dinner): David Weinberger speech……………………………..28 10. SESSION 6 (Saturday morning): Brendan Greeley: podcasting, credibility and non-text media……………………………………………………………..30 11. SESSION 7: Gillmor and Wales: Looking to the future……………………. 32 12. SESSION 8: Wrap-up………………………………………………………….38 13. SESSION 9: Open Session……………………………………………………. 40 14. Aftermath……………………………………………………………………….42 15. Final Feedback………………………………………………………………….46 16. Appendices a. Papers i. Rosen…………………………………………………………….49 ii. Mitchell & Steele………………………………………………..63 b. Schedule…………………………………………………………………82 c. List
    [Show full text]
  • The Digital Revolution: Debating the Promise and Perils of the Internet In
    The Digital Revolution: Debating the Promise and Perils of the Internet, Automation, and Algorithmic Lives in the Last Years of the Obama Administration LOS ANGELES REVIEW OF BOOKS | DIGITAL EDITIONS - JANUARY 2017 EDITORS: MICHELE PRIDMORE-BROWN AND JULIEN CROCKETT cover image courtesy of solidware.io/ Keywords: Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Automation, Big Data, Contextual Integrity, Cyberculture, Cyberspace, Digital Revolution, Dataism, Data Protection, Disruption, Echo Chamber, Efficiency, Emblematic Artifacts, Expository Society, Gamification, Governance, Internet, Internet of Things, Internet Privacy, Machine Learning, Networked-knowledge, Obfuscation, Regulation, Robotization, Social Contagion, Silicon Valley, Social Engineering, Social Network, Sociotechnical Ecology, Surveillance, Techno-Optimistic Bubble, Techno- Utopian Bubble, Turing Machine, Uncanny Valley. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 4 1 Rethinking Knowledge in the Internet Age by David Weinberger 8 2 Te Manipulators: Facebook’s Social Engineering Project by Nicholas Carr 16 3 Algorithms: The Future That Already Happened by Michael S. Evans 23 4 Internet Privacy: Stepping Up Our Self-Defense Game by Evan Selinger 26 5 Algorithmic Life by Massimo Mazzotti 31 6 Opt Out by Dennis Tenen 40 7 The University of Nowhere: The False Promise of “Disruption” by Frank Pasquale 45 8 Myth, Magic, and Mysticism in the Age of Information by Erik Davis 50 9 Creepy Futures: Nicholas Carr’s History of the Future by Geoff Nunberg 57 10 Creators of the World Unite by McKenzie Wark 62 11 Automating the Professions: Utopian Pipe Dream or Dystopian Nightmare? by Frank Pasquale 68 12 Bursting the Optimistic Technology Bubble by Evan Selinger 75 13 Jailbreaking Thought: The Alan Turing Centenary by Eli MacKinnon 80 14 Shaping the Future of War: The Important Questions by Julie Carpenter 84 3 4 Introduction Plenty of rapturous claims have been made about the internet as an agent of democratization and innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Berkman Center, Harvard Law School
    Annual Report for Academic Year 2010–2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Berkman Center continues to pursue its long-term strategic plan of sustained investment in collaborative research and teaching, partnerships, and network-building as a platform for innovative research methodologies and new initiatives—the next generation of our work. Building upon the streamlined and highly integrated workflow model developed in response to the financial crisis in 2008–2009 and honed in 2009–2010, the Center, under the leadership of Faculty Chair Professor William W. Fisher, has intensified and leveraged its activities in this regard in the 2010–2011 academic year, strengthening collaboration and boosting cooperation internally, externally, and among the many members of our network. Among people Over the last three years, we have remade and refined our processes around two of the Berkman Center’s flagship efforts, the fellowship and summer internship programs. This remodeling crystallized during this academic year with the implementation of a modified outreach and recruiting strategy, as well as a multi-step selection process, with the goal of bringing the most diverse set of outstanding participants and perspectives into the Center as possible. This year marked a high point in the number and diversity of applications received, representing a large number of countries, academic institutions, and personal backgrounds. As a result, the 2011 summer interns and the 2011–2012 fellows classes enjoy a richness of particularly diverse individuals. In parallel, we have created processes and improved infrastructure that invites and enables our affiliated faculty members to cooperate with one another, as well as with colleagues from other institutions, on ambitious interdisciplinary projects, often on an international scale.
    [Show full text]