Everyone Knows – the Dangers of Social Networking Websites

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Everyone Knows – the Dangers of Social Networking Websites Andy Van Zeeland Phil 308 10 Dec 2010 Everyone Knows – The Dangers of Social Networking Websites As of March 22, 2010, over one-third of all Americans have a Facebook profile and visit at least monthly (Hepburn). More than three billion photos are uploaded to the website each month, and more than 60 million status updates are posted each day (Hepburn). Facebook has pervaded the life of global culture in a way never seen before. This is a problem because Facebook is very apathetic about their users' privacy. Facebook has a history of changing privacy settings without actively alerting the user base, and even preventing users from hiding certain information from the world. This paper will provide a quick introduction to social networking and how it has evolved over the years, the rise of Facebook, and how Facebook has been continually exploiting the privacy of its users. When someone thinks about social networking, the ideas come to mind of posting a message on a group wall, inviting that old high school friend to join your friend list, and sharing that beautiful nature picture with all of your friends. But it hasn’t always been what we consider it today. Wikipedia defines a social networking service as “an online service, platform, or site that focuses on building and reflecting of social networks or social relations among people […] who share interests and/or activities” (“Social Network Service”). Social networking has been redefining itself ever since the term was coined. To be able to truly understand where it is headed, we have to first examine its past. The idea of 'social networking’ started with the BBS – short for Bulletin Board System (Nickson). BBSs were the precursor to the Internet and functioned similarly to the cork-and-pin bulletin boards often found in entrances to public places, where people can post information (“Bulletin Board System”). People would connect and log on to the system using a terminal program, and once logged on, the user would be presented with an array of actions that could be performed, such as 1 uploading and downloading programs, writing and reading messages to and from other users, and reading public message boards (“Bulletin Board System”). BBSs provided users with a rudimentary means to communicate with each other over phone lines before the Internet existed. They were quickly phased out with the rise of the World Wide Web, which brought about a lot of change in how social networking sites would operate. Finally, there were websites dedicated to the idea of social networking. One of the first of such websites was SixDegrees.com. It was revolutionary in the way that it allowed its users to create profiles, invite friends, organize groups, and surf other user profiles (Nickson). All of this was great, and with 3.5 million registered users at its peak, it seemed that SixDegrees would continue to grow and expand on the idea of a social networking website (Prall). Unfortunately though, SixDegrees did not last very long, and it certainly didn't leverage the popularity or support that a site such as Facebook has today (Prall). The biggest reason for its demise was the fact that the online advertising industry, which is Facebook's main source of income, wasn't as strong and mature as it is today (Prall, Parr). The fact that the economy was also entering a recession around the time the company peaked didn't help the low revenue numbers it was receiving from online advertising (Prall). So with SixDegrees crumbling shortly after the turn of the millennium, the online world found itself searching for the next answer to its new social networking need. In the year 2002, the answer appeared: Friendster (“Friendster”). Friendster took the ideas presented by SixDegrees, reapplied them in a newer technological age, and was able to flourish. Friendster grew and grew, and after a mere six months it had already hit three million registered members (Simon). However, its quick growth unfortunately led to its downfall. As its CEO was focused on further expansion and growth into the future, the website's servers were struggling to handle the increasing traffic. Users, bogged down with long load times, ended up searching for an alternative, and thus Myspace entered the scene. Myspace was created several months before Friendster started having problems. A few of its 2 members saw the great potential in this newly untapped market and began taking bits and pieces of its ideas to start their own version. They were employees of a company called eUniverse, which provided them with all the startup technical infrastructure required, greatly simplifying their entrance into the social networking business (Stone). This meant that the Myspace team was able to focus almost completely on business strategies, which allowed them to really thrive. One of the great differences between Myspace and other modern social networking sites is that Myspace allows a very high level of user page customization. For example, Myspace users can embed custom cascading style sheet (CSS) code into their user page. CSS is a way for the user to quickly and easily apply design changes to the website, such as adding background images, changing fonts and colors, or adding borders around certain parts of the page. Users can also embed a media player into their page that will play music or video when a user navigates to it. This is one of the reasons for Myspace’s appeal to the younger generation, who tend to be less interested in usability and more interested in creative expression. Unfortunately for Myspace, there was a bigger fish growing and competing with them after their debut in 2003: Facebook. Facebook was created in a Harvard dormitory in 2003. It has been widely successful because it expanded on a lot of the ideas from other social networking sites. Users can do all of the standard actions such as create profiles with photos, make lists of personal interests, and provide contact information and other basic personal information. What makes Facebook so successful now is the fact that it continues to stay ahead of the competition by adding brand new functionality, continually innovating and giving users more reasons to regularly log on. Facebook was revolutionary compared to other social networking sites, and it was able to edge out Myspace for several reasons. Facebook pages were designed with a much cleaner interface. Without all the user-added bells and whistles that Myspace boasted, Facebook was able to keep a much cleaner and more uniform layout and design. Because of this uniformity, users were able to find 3 information much faster than when forced to dig through a cluttered Myspace page. Another reason is that there was less advertising on Facebook. Also, Facebook encouraged you to register with a real name instead of with a username. This made finding and connecting with other users easier, as you could search by their full name instead of having to know their username. Moreover, Facebook was coming up with new innovations at a faster rate than Myspace, such as the creation of the wall and user groups, both of which were extremely popular. All of these reasons pushed Facebook to the lead, but probably the most important was the fact that Facebook was exclusive. It originally started as a website for Harvard students to network with other Harvard students and required a Harvard email address to register. Seeing the great potential in growing the user base, but being very careful not to alienate their original users, Facebook opened its doors to Stanford University as well as other universities in the Ivy League besides Harvard. After expanding to these schools, Facebook began offering membership to students at thousands of additional universities. Shortly thereafter, they opened membership to any person affiliated with a high school or high-profile company, and eventually welcomed anyone over the age of 13 years old. While they might have drifted away from their original user base, it was clearly worth it. Facebook has grown to be the supergiant of social networking sites, boasting an active user base of over 500 million people. To put that into perspective, that's around 32% of the active internet user population and there is no sign of slowing down. You might be thinking, so what? What's the big problem with Facebook becoming the de-facto standard for social networking needs? Well, his name is Mark Zuckerberg. Mark Zuckerberg, or “Zuck,” is the CEO and co-founder of Facebook. As such, he is able to lead the company in any direction he sees fit. In Vanity Fair’s 2010 list of “most influential people of the Information Age” Zuck is listed as number one. Thus, his past and beliefs deserve to be examined to determine if he’s someone we can trust with our personal information. 4 Zuck grew up in the outskirts of New York City and is the son of a psychiatrist and a dentist. He started programming at a young age and began learning software development even before attending high school. There he wrote a program called the Synapse Media Player that used rudimentary artificial intelligence to learn the user's listening habits. It was a widespread success. After being offered employment at such companies as Microsoft and AOL and receiving purchase offers, he released the software for free, turned down the job offers, and went off to Harvard to study psychology and computer science. As a sophomore at Harvard, his hacker persona really began to shine. In October of 2003, he wrote what some call the predecessor to Facebook: Facemash. Facemash was similar to the website “Hot or Not,” where females' pictures were paired up against each other and voted on to determine the “hotter” user.
Recommended publications
  • Creating & Connecting: Research and Guidelines on Online Social
    CREATING & CONNECTING//Research and Guidelines on Online Social — and Educational — Networking NATIONAL SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION CONTENTS Creating & Connecting//The Positives . Page 1 Online social networking Creating & Connecting//The Gaps . Page 4 is now so deeply embedded in the lifestyles of tweens and teens that Creating & Connecting//Expectations it rivals television for their atten- and Interests . Page 7 tion, according to a new study Striking a Balance//Guidance and Recommendations from Grunwald Associates LLC for School Board Members . Page 8 conducted in cooperation with the National School Boards Association. Nine- to 17-year-olds report spending almost as much time About the Study using social networking services This study was made possible with generous support and Web sites as they spend from Microsoft, News Corporation and Verizon. watching television. Among teens, The study was comprised of three surveys: an that amounts to about 9 hours a online survey of 1,277 nine- to 17-year-old students, an online survey of 1,039 parents and telephone inter- week on social networking activi- views with 250 school district leaders who make deci- ties, compared to about 10 hours sions on Internet policy. Grunwald Associates LLC, an a week watching TV. independent research and consulting firm that has conducted highly respected surveys on educator and Students are hardly passive family technology use since 1995, formulated and couch potatoes online. Beyond directed the study. Hypothesis Group managed the basic communications, many stu- field research. Tom de Boor and Li Kramer Halpern of dents engage in highly creative Grunwald Associates LLC provided guidance through- out the study and led the analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Networks for Main Street
    Ulster County Main Streets: A Regional Approach Ulster County Planning Department, 244 Fair Street, Kingston NY 12401 Why do we take a regional approach to Main Streets? There are many different approaches to supporting these centers in our local economy. The goal of the Ulster County Main Streets approach is to develop a program that is based on our region‘s specific needs and support appropriate responses and strategies that are built and sustained from within our communities. It is also founded upon the idea that communities are stronger when they work together, share knowledge, leverage their resources, and think regionally to support their ―competitive advantage.‖ What is the Main Streets Strategic Toolbox? Any successful planning effort requires solid information as a basis for decision-making. The Toolbox includes resources to help your community create a strong, sustainable strategy for Main Street revitalization. For a full list of topics in the toolbox, please contact our staff at 845-340-3338 or visit our website at www.ulstercountyny.gov/planning. Social Networks for Main Street The web has become more than a warehouse of information. Social networking (or ―Web 2.0‖) is an interactive information-sharing platform that allows internet users add content and interact with others. Businesses are using Web 2.0 to increase customer loyalty and market visibility. This offers tremendous potential for Main Street businesses. Consumers are online. For them, this is ―word of mouth‖ via the web. Some examples: Main Street Webpage: “Come see and shop New Paltz Main Street.” Consumer on Facebook: “Have you been to New Paltz?” Response: “Yeah, great!”“ Twitter Tweet: Just got back from New Paltz.
    [Show full text]
  • Topline Questionnaire
    12 PEW RESEARCH CENTER Topline questionnaire January 2021 Core Trends Survey Topline Abt Associates for Pew Research Center Sample: n=1,502 U.S. adults ages 18 and older nationwide, including 1,202 cellphone interviews Interviewing dates: January 25, 2021 – February 8, 2021 Margin of error: ± 2.9 percentage points for results based on Total [n=1,502] NOTE: ALL NUMBERS ARE PERCENTAGES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ROWS/COLUMNS MAY NOT TOTAL 100% DUE TO ROUNDING. PERCENTAGES LESS THAN 0.5% ARE REPLACED BY AN ASTERISK (*). IF NO ONE ANSWERED THE QUESTION, THE CELL CONTAINS ZERO (0). A DOUBLE HYPHEN (--) INDICATES THAT THE RESPONSE OPTION WAS NOT PRESENT IN THAT SURVEY. OTHER QUESTIONS ON THIS SURVEY HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY RELEASED OR HELD FOR FUTURE RELEASE. SNSINT2 Do you ever use social media sites like Facebook, Twitter or Instagram? CURRENT 72 Yes 28 No 0 (VOL.) Don’t know 0 (VOL.) Refused www.pewresearch.org 13 PEW RESEARCH CENTER Trend based on internet users3 [N=1,413] (VOL.) DON’T YES NO KNOW (VOL.) REFUSED Current 77 23 0 0 February 2019 78 22 0 0 January 2018 77 23 * 0 November 2016 77 23 * * May 2016 74 26 0 * November 2015 74 26 * * July 2015 76 23 * 0 September 2013 74 26 * 0 May 2013 72 28 0 * December 2012 67 33 * * August 2012 69 31 0 * February 2012 66 34 * 0 August 2011 64 35 * 0 May 2011 65 35 * 0 January 2011 61 39 0 0 December 2010 62 38 * 0 November 2010 61 39 * * September 2010 62 38 * 0 May 2010 61 39 0 0 January 2010 57 43 * 0 December 2009 56 44 0 * September 2009 47 52 * * April 2009 46 54 * * December 2008 35 65 * 0 November
    [Show full text]
  • Twitter, Myspace and Facebook Demystified - by Ted Janusz
    Twitter, MySpace and Facebook Demystified - by Ted Janusz Q: I hear people talking about Web sites like Twitter, MySpace and Facebook. What are they? And, even more importantly, should I be using them to promote oral implantology? First, you are not alone. A recent survey showed that 70 percent of American adults did not know enough about Twitter to even have an opinion. Tools like Twitter, Facebook and MySpace are components of something else you may have heard people talking about: Web 2.0 , a popular term for Internet applications in which the users are actively engaged in creating and distributing Web content. Web 1.0 probably consisted of the Web sites you saw back in the late 90s, which were nothing more than fancy electronic brochures. Web 1.5 would have been something like Amazon or eBay, sites on which one could buy, sell and leave reviews. What Web 3.0 will look like is anybody's guess! Let's look specifically at the three applications that you mentioned. Tweet, Tweet Twitter - "Twitter is like text messaging, only you can also do it from the Web," says Dan Tynan, the author of the Tynan on Technology blog. "Instead of sending a message to just one person, you can send it to thousands of people at once. You can choose to follow anyone's update (called "tweets") simply by clicking the Follow button on their profile, or vice-versa. The only rule is that each tweet can be no longer than 140 characters." Former CEO of Twitter Jack Dorsey once accepted an award for Twitter by saying, "We'd like to thank you in 140 characters or less.
    [Show full text]
  • LOEX of the West 2006 Program Descriptions
    Information Literacy for a Lifetime June 8 – 10, 2006 (Fairmont Orchid, Hawaii) 2006 LOEX-of-the-West, Program Descriptions Schedule At-a-Glance Thursday, June 8th 7:00 AM – Pre-Conference Continental Breakfast 8:00 AM 8:00 AM– Effective Teaching Techniques Making IL Relevant: Noon for One Shot Instruction Sessions Using Emerging Technologies in the Classroom 7:00 PM– Opening Reception 8:00 PM 8:00 PM– Big Island Talk Story (Hawaiiana Program) 9:00 PM Schedule At-a-Glance Friday, June 9th 6:00 AM– Continental Breakfast 7:00 AM 7:00 AM– Opening General Session - Creating Spaces for Alternative Ways of Knowing & Testing 8:00 AM Information Literacy and Global Citizenship: Making Podcasts and Promoting Lifelong A Checklist of Footholds and the Connection Screencasts: Opening Learning within the 8:15 AM– Information Foundations: Setting Between Lifelong Academic Library Constraints of the 9:00 AM Competencies for Freshmen on the Road Learning and Instruction to Global One-Shot: The Social College Students to Lifelong Learning Information Literacy Learners Sciences Perspective in the Global Studies Classroom Puffins, Popcorn, and Multimedia Library Retreat and Advance: Googlization of Parker Posey: Using Teaming Up: Faculty, Instruction for Multi- Extracting IL Information and User Interactive Librarians and 9:15 AM– Literate Net-Gens: Outcomes from Upper Preferences: Technology to Teach Technologists 10:00 AM Podcasts & Cable Level Curricula (or a Implications for Information Literacy Creating an Integrated Commercials at Prelude to Injecting
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Topological Characteristics of Huge Online Social Networking Services Yong-Yeol Ahn, Seungyeop Han, Haewoon Kwak, Young-Ho Eom, Sue Moon, Hawoong Jeong
    1 Analysis of Topological Characteristics of Huge Online Social Networking Services Yong-Yeol Ahn, Seungyeop Han, Haewoon Kwak, Young-Ho Eom, Sue Moon, Hawoong Jeong Abstract— Social networking services are a fast-growing busi- the statistics severely and it is imperative to use large data sets ness in the Internet. However, it is unknown if online relationships in network structure analysis. and their growth patterns are the same as in real-life social It is only very recently that we have seen research results networks. In this paper, we compare the structures of three online social networking services: Cyworld, MySpace, and orkut, from large networks. Novel network structures from human each with more than 10 million users, respectively. We have societies and communication systems have been unveiled; just access to complete data of Cyworld’s ilchon (friend) relationships to name a few are the Internet and WWW [3] and the patents, and analyze its degree distribution, clustering property, degree Autonomous Systems (AS), and affiliation networks [4]. Even correlation, and evolution over time. We also use Cyworld data in the short history of the Internet, SNSs are a fairly new to evaluate the validity of snowball sampling method, which we use to crawl and obtain partial network topologies of MySpace phenomenon and their network structures are not yet studied and orkut. Cyworld, the oldest of the three, demonstrates a carefully. The social networks of SNSs are believed to reflect changing scaling behavior over time in degree distribution. The the real-life social relationships of people more accurately than latest Cyworld data’s degree distribution exhibits a multi-scaling any other online networks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Researching and Teaching Communication Series
    THE RESEARCHING AND TEACHING COMMUNICATION SERIES THE RESEARCHING AND TEACHING COMMUNICATION SERIES MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES AND DEMOCRACY IN AN ENLARGED EUROPE THE INTELLECTUAL WORK OF THE 2007 EUROPEAN MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION DOCTORAL SUMMER SCHOOL Edited by Nico Carpentier Pille Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt Kaarle Nordenstreng Maren Hartmann Peeter Vihalemm Bart Cammaerts Hannu Nieminen The Intensive Programme in Media and Communication: Enlarging Europe – Enlarging Participation is supported by the Socrates Erasmus IP project (contract number: 69935-IC-1-2004-EE-ERASMUS-IPUC-6), the European Communication Research and Education Association (www.ecrea.eu), the University of Tartu – the Department of Journalism and Communication (www.jrnl.ut.ee) and a consortium of 19 universities. ISSN 1736–3918 (print) ISBN 978–9949–11–744–4 (print) ISSN 1736–4752 (PDF) ISBN 978–9949–11–745–1 (PDF) Copyright: Authors 2007 Tartu University Press www.tyk.ee Table of contents INTRODUCTION Introduction: Participation and learning. The intellectual work of the 2007 European media and communication doctoral summer school in Tartu......................................................................................................... 11 Nico Carpentier PART ONE SECTION ONE: TECHNOLOGY, DEMOCRACY AND POLICY Communication and technology: beyond determinism?...................... 27 Denis McQuail Public service broadcasting in a multimedia environment .................. 41 Jo Bardoel Towards the democratic regulation of European media and communication ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Obtaining and Using Evidence from Social Networking Sites
    U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division Washington, D.C. 20530 CRM-200900732F MAR 3 2010 Mr. James Tucker Mr. Shane Witnov Electronic Frontier Foundation 454 Shotwell Street San Francisco, CA 94110 Dear Messrs Tucker and Witnov: This is an interim response to your request dated October 6, 2009 for access to records concerning "use of social networking websites (including, but not limited to Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, Flickr and other online social media) for investigative (criminal or otherwise) or data gathering purposes created since January 2003, including, but not limited to: 1) documents that contain information on the use of "fake identities" to "trick" users "into accepting a [government] official as friend" or otherwise provide information to he government as described in the Boston Globe article quoted above; 2) guides, manuals, policy statements, memoranda, presentations, or other materials explaining how government agents should collect information on social networking websites: 3) guides, manuals, policy statements, memoranda, presentations, or other materials, detailing how or when government agents may collect information through social networking websites; 4) guides, manuals, policy statements, memoranda, presentations and other materials detailing what procedures government agents must follow to collect information through social- networking websites; 5) guides, manuals, policy statements, memorandum, presentations, agreements (both formal and informal) with social-networking companies, or other materials relating to privileged user access by the Criminal Division to the social networking websites; 6) guides, manuals, memoranda, presentations or other materials for using any visualization programs, data analysis programs or tools used to analyze data gathered from social networks; 7) contracts, requests for proposals, or purchase orders for any visualization programs, data analysis programs or tools used to analyze data gathered from social networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Web 2.0 Technologies
    Introduction to Web 2.0 Joshua Stern, Ph.D. Introduction to Web 2.0 Technologies What is Web 2.0? Æ A simple explanation of Web 2.0 (3 minute video): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LzQIUANnHc&feature=related Æ A complex explanation of Web 2.0 (5 minute video): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsa5ZTRJQ5w&feature=related Æ An interesting, fast-paced video about Web.2.0 (4:30 minute video): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLlGopyXT_g Web 2.0 is a term that describes the changing trends in the use of World Wide Web technology and Web design that aim to enhance creativity, secure information sharing, increase collaboration, and improve the functionality of the Web as we know it (Web 1.0). These have led to the development and evolution of Web-based communities and hosted services, such as social-networking sites (i.e. Facebook, MySpace), video sharing sites (i.e. YouTube), wikis, blogs, etc. Although the term suggests a new version of the World Wide Web, it does not refer to any actual change in technical specifications, but rather to changes in the ways software developers and end- users utilize the Web. Web 2.0 is a catch-all term used to describe a variety of developments on the Web and a perceived shift in the way it is used. This shift can be characterized as the evolution of Web use from passive consumption of content to more active participation, creation and sharing. Web 2.0 Websites allow users to do more than just retrieve information.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Networking: Myspace and Facebook
    [Not for Circulation] Social Networking: MySpace and Facebook Signing Up for MySpace 1. Go to http://www.MySpace.com. 2. Click on the SIGN UP! Button located in the Member Login area. 3. On the page that follows, fill in the required information to create a MySpace membership. Note: On this page you will also find options for creating a Band/Musician, Comedian, or Filmmaker MySpace page. Each choice will require different information to be filled in. 4. Once all of the information on the sign up form is completed, click the Sign Up button at the bottom of the page. 5. The next page that appears will allow you to upload a photo, so that other MySpace members can see who you are. Click the Browse button to navigate to an image on your computer that you would like to upload. If you do not have a photo at this time, you can skip this and upload a photo later. 6. Once you have chosen a photo, click the Upload button. 7. At this time you can invite friends to your new MySpace page if you have their email addresses. In the To: field located in the Invite Friends section, you can enter email addresses for up to 10 friends you would like to invite. Other friends may be added later. 8. Once you have entered email addresses, click the Send Invitation button. This will send an email to your friends inviting them to your MySpace page. 9. You have successfully signed up for MySpace! Information Technology Services, UIS 1 [Not for Circulation] Signing Up for Facebook 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Myspace and Facebook: Applying the Uses and Gratifications Theory to Exploring Friend-Networking Sites
    CYBERPSYCHOLOGY & BEHAVIOR Volume 11, Number 2, 2008 © Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0056 MySpace and Facebook: Applying the Uses and Gratifications Theory to Exploring Friend-Networking Sites JOHN RAACKE, Ph.D. and JENNIFER BONDS-RAACKE, Ph.D. ABSTRACT The increased use of the Internet as a new tool in communication has changed the way peo- ple interact. This fact is even more evident in the recent development and use of friend-net- working sites. However, no research has evaluated these sites and their impact on college stu- dents. Therefore, the present study was conducted to evaluate: (a) why people use these friend-networking sites, (b) what the characteristics are of the typical college user, and (c) what uses and gratifications are met by using these sites. Results indicated that the vast ma- jority of college students are using these friend-networking sites for a significant portion of their day for reasons such as making new friends and locating old friends. Additionally, both men and women of traditional college age are equally engaging in this form of online com- munication with this result holding true for nearly all ethnic groups. Finally, results showed that many uses and gratifications are met by users (e.g., “keeping in touch with friends”). Re- sults are discussed in light of the impact that friend-networking sites have on communica- tion and social needs of college students. INTRODUCTION women are more likely to engage in online com- munication to maintain personal connections with LTHOUGH THE INTERNET originated in the United family, friends, and coworkers, whereas men use AStates, its use has spread quickly throughout online communication for pursuing sexual interests the world.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 Sites and Apps Kids Are Heading to After Facebook Remember
    11 Sites and Apps Kids Are Heading to After Facebook Remember MySpace? Not so long ago, practically every teen in the world was on it –- and then many left for Facebook. Now, as Facebook's popularity among teens is starting to wane, you might be wondering what the new "it" social network is. But the days of a one-stop shop for all social networking needs are over. Instead, teens are dividing their attention between an array of apps. You don't need to know the ins and outs of every app and site that's "hot" right now (and frankly, if you did, they wouldn't be trendy anymore). But knowing the basics -- what they are, why they're popular, and the problems that can crop up when they're not used responsibly. 11 Social Media Tools Parents Need to Know About Now Twitter Instagram Snapchat Tumblr Google+ Vine Wanelo Kik Messenger Ooovoo Pheed Ask.fm 1. Twitter is a microblogging site that allows users to post brief, 140-character messages -- called "tweets" -- and follow other users' activities. Why it's popular Teens like using it to share quick tidbits about their lives with friends. What parents need to know Public tweets are the norm for teens. Though you can choose to keep your tweets private, most teens report having public accounts. Updates appear immediately. Even though you can remove tweets, your followers can still read what you wrote until it's gone. This can get kids in trouble if they say something in the heat of the moment.
    [Show full text]