DOCSLIB.ORG

Fair Work Commission – Annual Report 2016–2017 – Access To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fair Work Commission – Annual Report 2016–2017 – Access To 2016–2017 ANNUAL REPORT ACCESS TO JUSTICE 2016–2017 ANNUAL REPORT ACCESS TO JUSTICE FAIR WORK COMMISSION AUSTRALIA’S NATIONAL WORKPLACE RELATIONS TRIBUNAL Requests for information and feedback Requests for information and feedback should be directed to: Astra Balzan Policy and Planning Coordinator PO Box 1994 Melbourne VIC 3001 Tel: (03) 8656 4857 Email: [email protected] Visit www.fwc.gov.au for more information about the Fair Work Commission or go to https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/reports-publications/annual-reports Copyright © Commonwealth of Australia 2017 ISSN 2204-3799 (printed copy) ISSN 2202-3802 (online copy) All material included in the Fair Work Commission’s Annual Report 2016–17 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) with the exception of: the Commonwealth Coat of Arms the Fair Work Commission logo and any branding or trademarks photographs and images other material where copyright subsists in a third party. The full licence terms are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode Content from this document must be attributed to the Fair Work Commission Annual Report 2016–17. To the extent that copyright subsists in a third party, permission will be required from the third party to reuse the material. The terms under which the Commonwealth Coat of Arms can be used are set out at http://www.dpmc.gov.au/government/commonwealth-coat-arms This publication is designed by Papercut Graphic Design and edited by WordsWorth Writing. This publication is available in PDF and accessible format at www.fwc.gov.au/annual-report Australia’s National Workplace Relations Tribunal 21 September 2017 The Honourable Justice Iain Ross AO President Senator the Hon. Michaelia Cash Minister for Employment Bernadette O’Neill Parliament House General Manager Canberra ACT 2600 Dear Minister We are pleased to present to you the Annual Report of the Fair Work Commission for the financial year ended 30 June 2017. This report is provided pursuant to s.652 of the Fair Work Act 2009 and in accordance with s.46 of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 and the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Rule 2014. Yours sincerely Justice Iain Ross AO Bernadette O’Neill President General Manager 11 Exhibition Street GPO Box 1994 e | [email protected] Melbourne Victoria 3000 Melbourne Victoria 3001 t | +61 8656 4520 www.fwc.gov.au ANNUAL REPORT 2016–2017 3 READERS’ GUIDE This annual report informs the Australian Parliament and public about the Fair Work Commission’s performance and compliance with its obligations during the 2016–17 financial year. OVERVIEW The overview includes reports from the President and General Manager and provides information about the Commission, including its organisational structure, Members, history and stakeholders. PERFORMANCE This section provides information about the Commission’s work and performance during 2016–17. It includes an outline of the Commission’s performance framework; the annual performance statements, which detail the Commission’s performance against intended results and performance criteria set out in its portfolio budget statements and corporate plan; and a detailed discussion of the Commission’s operational performance. MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY This section reports on the Commission’s internal operations, including corporate governance, human resources management, financial management and external scrutiny. It also reports against certain legislated annual reporting requirements. APPENDICES AND REFERENCES Seven appendices provide detailed information to complement the main report. Appendices A to D provide details of the Tribunal and its activities; Appendix E comprises the 2016–17 financial statements; Appendix F provides information on the Commission’s subscription services; and Appendix G shows where each annual reporting requirement is addressed in this annual report. At the back of the report are tools to assist you to use the report—including a glossary, a list of acronyms and abbreviations, and an index—and contact details for the Commission. 4 FAIR WORK COMMISSION CONTENTS Overview 9 President’s introduction 10 General Manager’s overview 13 About the Commission 15 Role 16 Structure 17 History 20 Clients and stakeholders 23 Performance 31 Performance snapshot 32 Performance framework 34 Annual performance statement 36 Operational performance 41 Management and accountability 113 Corporate governance 114 External scrutiny 121 Management of human resources 121 Financial management 128 Other mandatory information 132 Appendices 135 Appendix A: List of Members 136 Appendix B: Panel assignments 138 Appendix C: Members’ activities 145 Appendix D: Tables and figures reference data 148 Appendix E: Financial statements 156 Appendix F: Subscription services 202 Appendix G: List of requirements 203 Glossary 206 Acronyms and abbreviations 209 Index 210 Contacts 220 ANNUAL REPORT 2016–2017 5 List of tables Table 1: Performance framework 35 Table 2: Annual performance statements—results for Activity One 37 Table 3: Annual performance statements—results for Activity Two 39 Table 4: Annual performance statements—results for Activity Three 40 Table 5: Volume of work, by matter type 42 Table 6: Enterprise agreements—lodgments and outcomes 54 Table 7: Enterprise agreements—timeliness, approved agreements 59 Table 8: Enterprise agreements—timeliness, type of agreement 59 Table 9: Enterprise agreements—applications to vary agreements 61 Table 10: Enterprise agreements—applications to terminate enterprise agreements 61 Table 11: Industrial action—lodgments 65 Table 12: Industrial action—timeliness, all applications 66 Table 13: Industrial action—timeliness, protected action ballot orders and orders to stop action 67 Table 14: Dispute applications—lodgments 68 Table 15: Dispute applications—timeliness 69 Table 16: Unfair dismissal—finalisation of matters 78 Table 17: Unfair dismissal—conciliation outcomes 79 Table 18: Unfair dismissal—matters resolved at conciliation 79 Table 19: Unfair dismissal—conciliation resolutions involving monetary terms 80 Table 20: Unfair dismissal—jurisdiction outcomes 81 Table 21: Unfair dismissal—applications dismissed under s.399A and s.587 of the Fair Work Act 83 Table 22: Unfair dismissal—arbitration outcomes 84 Table 23: Unfair dismissal—arbitration outcomes, application granted with compensation 84 Table 24: Unfair dismissal—arbitration outcomes, application granted with reinstatement and lost remuneration 85 Table 25: Unfair dismissal—timeliness, lodgment to first conciliation 85 Table 26: Unfair dismissal—timeliness, lodgment to finalisation 85 Table 27: General protections disputes involving dismissal—lodgments 89 Table 28: General protections disputes involving dismissal—outcomes of applications 89 Table 29: General protections disputes involving dismissal—conciliation outcomes 90 Table 30: General protections disputes involving dismissal—conciliation resolutions involving monetary payment 91 Table 31: General protections disputes involving dismissal—timeliness 92 Table 32: General protections disputes involving dismissal—applications for consent arbitration 92 Table 33: General protections disputes not involving dismissal—lodgments 93 Table 34: General protections disputes not involving dismissal—timeliness 93 Table 35: Unlawful termination disputes—lodgments 94 6 FAIR WORK COMMISSION Table 36: Unlawful termination disputes—timeliness 95 Table 37: Anti-bullying—applications 96 Table 38: Anti-bullying—finalisation 97 Table 39: Anti-bullying—applications finalised by decision 97 Table 40: Anti-bullying—timeliness 98 Table 41: Appeals—permission to appeal outcomes 103 Table 42: Appeals—Commission decisions 104 Table 43: Appeals—judicial review decisions 104 Table 44: Registered organisations—division of responsibilities from 1 May 2017 105 Table 45: Registered organisations—status of referrals from the Royal Commission into Trade Union Governance and Corruption 106 Table 46: Registered organisations—inquiries and investigations 108 Table 47: Registered organisations —matters finalised by the organisations panel 109 Table 48: Registered organisations—timeliness, regulatory functions transferred to the Registered Organisations Commission 110 Table 49: Registered organisations—timeliness, regulatory functions retained by the Tribunal and General Manager 111 Table 50: Registered organisations—permits finalised 112 Table 51: Written complaints 120 Table 52: Ongoing employees by employment status (headcount) 122 Table 53: Non-ongoing employees by employment status (headcount) 122 Table 54: Ongoing and non-ongoing employees by location (headcount) 122 Table 55: Ongoing and non-ongoing employees by substantive classification (headcount) 123 Table 56: Salary ranges by classification 125 Table 57: Fair Work Commission resource statement 2016–17 130 Table 58: Fair Work Commission expenses by outcomes 2016–17 131 Table D1: Annual wage review—timeliness 148 Table D2: Enterprise agreements—timeliness, finalisation 148 Table D3: Industrial action—timeliness, listings 148 Table D4: Total applications, hearings and conferences, and decisions and orders 148 Table D5: Enterprise agreements—results 149 Table D6: Hearings and conferences by Members 150 Table D7: Unfair dismissal—conciliation matters, size of employer 150 Table D8: Applications lodged, by type of matter 151 List of figures Figure 1: Organisational structure at 30 June 2017 17
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Australian Journal of Labour Law (AJLL) Volume 33 Part 1 (Guest Editors’ Introduction and Articles Included in This Part Are Linked to the Lexisnexis Platform)
    Australian Journal of Labour Law (AJLL) Volume 33 Part 1 (guest editors’ introduction and articles included in this part are linked to the LexisNexis platform) CONTENTS Guest Editors’ Introduction The Fair Work Act in 2020 Hindsight: The Current Multifaceted Crisis and Prospects for the Future — Kurt Walpole, Nic Kimberley and Shae McCrystal 1 The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) has reached the significant milestone of 10 years in operation, and is the first Australian labour law regime to endure so long since the first moves away from conciliation and arbitration in the late 1980s. This Special Issue brings together expert analyses that address aspects of the Act that have received relatively little scholarly attention, such as the National Employment Standards, modern awards and union right of entry, as well as key issues including wages and agreement-making, enforcement of the Act and individual protections and the overall state of Australian unions. In this introduction to the Special Issue, we look back at the political and academic debates surrounding the Fair Work Act over its first decade of operation. This review reveals an apparent paradox — whereas academic analyses point to a ‘multifaceted crisis’ of wage stagnation, declining collective agreement coverage and underpayment of wages, two major reviews of the Act have concluded that the legislation is operating effectively to achieve its objectives. The other articles in this special issue identify shortcomings of the Fair Work Act and propose constructive improvements in their focus areas. However, we suggest that Australian labour law will effectively grapple with addressing the current crises only if debates interrogate the normative principles underpinning the law.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Council of Trade Unions Is the Peak Body Representing Almost 2 Million Working Australians
    Inquiry into the Workplace Relations Framework ACTU Submission to the Productivity Commission This submission uses unit record data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey. The HILDA Project was initiated and is funded by the Australian Government Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (FaHCSIA) and is managed by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research (MIAESR). The findings and views reported in this report, however, are those of the authors and should not be attributed to either FaHCSIA or the MIAESR. i Table Contents Table Contents ..................................................................................................... ii Index to Tables .................................................................................................. viii Index to Figures ................................................................................................... ix Appendices .......................................................................................................... xi Abbreviations ...................................................................................................... xii Key points and observations .............................................................................. 1 Chapter 1 First Principles: The Purpose of Industrial Relations Regulation. ............................................ 13 Chapter 2 The International Context ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Industrial Relations Policy and Penalty David Peetz
    23 The Industrial Relations Policy and Penalty David Peetz This chapter examines the role of industrial relations (IR) in the 2016 election, one that featured campaigns by and about (that is, against) trade unions. I commence with a brief history of industrial relations in Australian elections over several decades, including the 2007 ‘Your Rights at Work’ (YRAW) campaign. I then discuss the parties’ positioning on IR in the lead-up to the election over 2013–15, including two major inquiry reports. This is followed by the role played by key IR issues in the double dissolution, and the subsequent 2016 campaign—union misbehaviour, penalty rates and the Country Fire Authority (CFA) dispute—including a discussion of the union campaign against the government, with an assessment of its effectiveness and what might be seen as the industrial relations ‘penalty’ during the campaign. A brief history of industrial relations in Australian elections With unions being formally tied to the Australian Labor Party (ALP), conservative parties have long sought to discredit unions as a means to discredit the ALP. Indeed, the conflict between capital and labour is the core conflict within capitalism, so it should not surprise that it is also central to political conflict in Australia. Hence, IR is an area of strong 519 DOUBLE DISILLUSION ideological conviction for Coalition members—it is the issue on which surveys show the greatest difference between Coalition and Labor Party candidates (Taft 1998). It has featured prominently, one way or another, in many elections. Through the 1950s and 1960s, communist influence in the Labor Party, via unions, was a major issue pushed by the Liberal Party.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew Stewart and Others
    Labour Regulation: Is There a Case for Major Reform? Professor Andrew Stewart Adelaide Law School Professor Peter Gahan Centre for Workplace Leadership, University of Melbourne Associate Professor Shae McCrystal Sydney Law School Associate Professor Anna Chapman Melbourne Law School with the support of Prof Rosemary Owens AO, Assoc Prof Anne Hewitt, Dr Joanna Howe and Assoc Prof Alexander Reilly (Work and Employment Regulation research group, Adelaide Law School) Prof John Howe, Prof Beth Gaze, Dr Tess Hardy and Associate Professor Joo-Cheong Tham (Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law, Melbourne Law School) Prof Joellen Riley (Labour Law and Relations group, Sydney Law School) Prof Anthony Forsyth and Prof Breen Creighton (RMIT School of Business & Law) Submission to the Productivity Commission Inquiry into the Workplace Relations Framework March 2015 Introduction and summary This submission has been prepared by a group of researchers, spread across four institutions. Our expertise spans the disciplines of law, economics, management and industrial relations, and we include amongst our ranks many of Australia’s leading scholars in the field of labour law and regulation. We draw here not only on our own research, and that of others in our field, but on the practical experience of workplace relations that many of us have gained in acting for management, unions and/or workers, whether in legal practice or otherwise. Our purpose is to make the following general points about Australia’s current system of labour regulation and the approach that we believe the Productivity Commission should take in reviewing it: 1. The regime established by the Fair Work Act 2009 (Fair Work Act) is based on a balance or accommodation between competing interests and objectives, arrived at after a lengthy period of change and upheaval in both the conduct and regulation of workplace relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Reported Wage Theft
    A fair day’s pay for a fair day’s work? Exposing the true cost of wage theft in Queensland Report No. 9, 56th Parliament Education, Employment and Small Business Committee November 2018 Education, Employment and Small Business Committee Chair Ms Leanne Linard MP, Member for Nudgee Deputy Chair Mrs Jann Stuckey MP, Member for Currumbin Members Mr Bruce Saunders MP, Member for Maryborough Mrs Simone Wilson MP, Member for Pumicestone Mr Michael Healy MP, Member for Cairns Mr Nick Dametto MP, Member for Hinchinbrook Committee Secretariat Telephone +61 7 3553 6657 Fax +61 7 3553 6699 Email [email protected] Committee webpage www.parliament.qld.gov.au/EESBC Acknowledgements The committee acknowledges the contributions of Mr Don Brown MP, who participated in a number of the committee’s hearings and meetings during the inquiry, including many of the committee’s hearings in various regional locations across Queensland. The committee also acknowledges the assistance provided by the Queensland Office of Industrial Relations, the Queensland Parliamentary Library and Research Services, the Fair Work Ombudsman, the Australian Taxation Office, and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. Inquiry into wage theft in Queensland Contents Abbreviations iv Glossary vii Chair’s foreword ix Recommendations x 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Role of the committee 1 1.2 Inquiry referral and process 1 1.3 Submissions 2 1.4 Online survey 2 1.5 Briefings and hearings 2 1.6 Parliamentary privilege and the right of reply 3 1.7 Inquiry material 3 1.8 Inquiry
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Employment and Industrial Relations Conference
    A Review and Analysis of Unpaid Wages Claims in the Federal jurisdiction including the impact of the Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Vulnerable Workers) Act 2017 Ann Fitzpatrick Basic Legal Scaffolding for Unpaid Wages Claims a) What is the basis of such a claim; b) Who can prosecute the claim; c) Where and when can claims be brought; and d) What are the jurisdictional limits.01 a) Whose responsibility is it to pay wages? Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) binds Holding Employers Franchisors Companies 02 Where do you find the relevant wages? Wages, remuneration and Other arrangements impacting entitlements are set out in one whether wages are unpaid: or more of: – Award offset clauses – Terms of the contract; – Trade-off of benefits – Applicable awards; – Permitted deductions – Industrial instruments; – High Income guarantee – A relevant statute. 03 Where do you find the relevant wages? Wages, remuneration and Other arrangements impacting entitlements are set out in one upon the question of whether of more of: wages are unpaid: – Terms of the contract; – Awards offset clause – Applicable awards; – Trade-off of benefits – Industrial instruments; – Permitted deductions – A relevant statute. – High Income guarantee 03 Who can prosecute a claim for unpaid wages? • Civil remedies – Chapter 4 FWA • Generally, a claim may be made by an employee, an employee’s union or a Fair Work Ombudsman Inspector – s 539 FWA 04 When and where can unpaid wages claims be brought? • 6 years after the contravention day • Small claims procedure – Federal Circuit Court and
    [Show full text]
  • 'Mad Men': the Fallout from the Qantas Industrial Dispute
    OF ‘KAMIKAZES’ AND ‘MAD MEN’: THE FALLOUT FROM THE QANTAS INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE ANTHONY FORSYTH* AND ANDREW STEWART† [The Qantas industrial dispute made headlines around the world, after the airline took the drastic step in October 2011 of grounding its fleet ahead of a proposed lockout of a large proportion of its workforce. Essentially a contest between job security and employ- ment flexibility, the dispute was one of the most significant in Australia for some time. This article examines the origins and circumstances of the Qantas dispute and the issues it highlighted as to the operation of key aspects of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). We conclude that, particularly in light of the federal industrial tribunal’s endorsement of the airline’s strategy and support for the concept of ‘managerial prerogative’, the dispute may have long-term implications for workplace regulation in Australia.] CONTENTS I Introduction .............................................................................................................. 786 II Background to the Qantas Dispute ....................................................................... 789 A The Battlelines Are Drawn: Company and Union Perspectives ........... 789 B The Battle Begins ......................................................................................... 792 III The Dispute Takes Off ............................................................................................. 796 A Qantas’s Grounding and Proposed Lockout ............................................ 796 B The
    [Show full text]