2019 Employment and Industrial Relations Conference
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Australian Journal of Labour Law (AJLL) Volume 33 Part 1 (Guest Editors’ Introduction and Articles Included in This Part Are Linked to the Lexisnexis Platform)
Australian Journal of Labour Law (AJLL) Volume 33 Part 1 (guest editors’ introduction and articles included in this part are linked to the LexisNexis platform) CONTENTS Guest Editors’ Introduction The Fair Work Act in 2020 Hindsight: The Current Multifaceted Crisis and Prospects for the Future — Kurt Walpole, Nic Kimberley and Shae McCrystal 1 The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) has reached the significant milestone of 10 years in operation, and is the first Australian labour law regime to endure so long since the first moves away from conciliation and arbitration in the late 1980s. This Special Issue brings together expert analyses that address aspects of the Act that have received relatively little scholarly attention, such as the National Employment Standards, modern awards and union right of entry, as well as key issues including wages and agreement-making, enforcement of the Act and individual protections and the overall state of Australian unions. In this introduction to the Special Issue, we look back at the political and academic debates surrounding the Fair Work Act over its first decade of operation. This review reveals an apparent paradox — whereas academic analyses point to a ‘multifaceted crisis’ of wage stagnation, declining collective agreement coverage and underpayment of wages, two major reviews of the Act have concluded that the legislation is operating effectively to achieve its objectives. The other articles in this special issue identify shortcomings of the Fair Work Act and propose constructive improvements in their focus areas. However, we suggest that Australian labour law will effectively grapple with addressing the current crises only if debates interrogate the normative principles underpinning the law. -
Fair Work Commission – Annual Report 2016–2017 – Access To
2016–2017 ANNUAL REPORT ACCESS TO JUSTICE 2016–2017 ANNUAL REPORT ACCESS TO JUSTICE FAIR WORK COMMISSION AUSTRALIA’S NATIONAL WORKPLACE RELATIONS TRIBUNAL Requests for information and feedback Requests for information and feedback should be directed to: Astra Balzan Policy and Planning Coordinator PO Box 1994 Melbourne VIC 3001 Tel: (03) 8656 4857 Email: [email protected] Visit www.fwc.gov.au for more information about the Fair Work Commission or go to https://www.fwc.gov.au/about-us/reports-publications/annual-reports Copyright © Commonwealth of Australia 2017 ISSN 2204-3799 (printed copy) ISSN 2202-3802 (online copy) All material included in the Fair Work Commission’s Annual Report 2016–17 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) with the exception of: the Commonwealth Coat of Arms the Fair Work Commission logo and any branding or trademarks photographs and images other material where copyright subsists in a third party. The full licence terms are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode Content from this document must be attributed to the Fair Work Commission Annual Report 2016–17. To the extent that copyright subsists in a third party, permission will be required from the third party to reuse the material. The terms under which the Commonwealth Coat of Arms can be used are set out at http://www.dpmc.gov.au/government/commonwealth-coat-arms This publication is designed by Papercut Graphic Design and edited by WordsWorth Writing. This publication is available in PDF and accessible format at www.fwc.gov.au/annual-report Australia’s National Workplace Relations Tribunal 21 September 2017 The Honourable Justice Iain Ross AO President Senator the Hon. -
Australian Council of Trade Unions Is the Peak Body Representing Almost 2 Million Working Australians
Inquiry into the Workplace Relations Framework ACTU Submission to the Productivity Commission This submission uses unit record data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey. The HILDA Project was initiated and is funded by the Australian Government Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (FaHCSIA) and is managed by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research (MIAESR). The findings and views reported in this report, however, are those of the authors and should not be attributed to either FaHCSIA or the MIAESR. i Table Contents Table Contents ..................................................................................................... ii Index to Tables .................................................................................................. viii Index to Figures ................................................................................................... ix Appendices .......................................................................................................... xi Abbreviations ...................................................................................................... xii Key points and observations .............................................................................. 1 Chapter 1 First Principles: The Purpose of Industrial Relations Regulation. ............................................ 13 Chapter 2 The International Context ................................................................................ -
The Industrial Relations Policy and Penalty David Peetz
23 The Industrial Relations Policy and Penalty David Peetz This chapter examines the role of industrial relations (IR) in the 2016 election, one that featured campaigns by and about (that is, against) trade unions. I commence with a brief history of industrial relations in Australian elections over several decades, including the 2007 ‘Your Rights at Work’ (YRAW) campaign. I then discuss the parties’ positioning on IR in the lead-up to the election over 2013–15, including two major inquiry reports. This is followed by the role played by key IR issues in the double dissolution, and the subsequent 2016 campaign—union misbehaviour, penalty rates and the Country Fire Authority (CFA) dispute—including a discussion of the union campaign against the government, with an assessment of its effectiveness and what might be seen as the industrial relations ‘penalty’ during the campaign. A brief history of industrial relations in Australian elections With unions being formally tied to the Australian Labor Party (ALP), conservative parties have long sought to discredit unions as a means to discredit the ALP. Indeed, the conflict between capital and labour is the core conflict within capitalism, so it should not surprise that it is also central to political conflict in Australia. Hence, IR is an area of strong 519 DOUBLE DISILLUSION ideological conviction for Coalition members—it is the issue on which surveys show the greatest difference between Coalition and Labor Party candidates (Taft 1998). It has featured prominently, one way or another, in many elections. Through the 1950s and 1960s, communist influence in the Labor Party, via unions, was a major issue pushed by the Liberal Party. -
Andrew Stewart and Others
Labour Regulation: Is There a Case for Major Reform? Professor Andrew Stewart Adelaide Law School Professor Peter Gahan Centre for Workplace Leadership, University of Melbourne Associate Professor Shae McCrystal Sydney Law School Associate Professor Anna Chapman Melbourne Law School with the support of Prof Rosemary Owens AO, Assoc Prof Anne Hewitt, Dr Joanna Howe and Assoc Prof Alexander Reilly (Work and Employment Regulation research group, Adelaide Law School) Prof John Howe, Prof Beth Gaze, Dr Tess Hardy and Associate Professor Joo-Cheong Tham (Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law, Melbourne Law School) Prof Joellen Riley (Labour Law and Relations group, Sydney Law School) Prof Anthony Forsyth and Prof Breen Creighton (RMIT School of Business & Law) Submission to the Productivity Commission Inquiry into the Workplace Relations Framework March 2015 Introduction and summary This submission has been prepared by a group of researchers, spread across four institutions. Our expertise spans the disciplines of law, economics, management and industrial relations, and we include amongst our ranks many of Australia’s leading scholars in the field of labour law and regulation. We draw here not only on our own research, and that of others in our field, but on the practical experience of workplace relations that many of us have gained in acting for management, unions and/or workers, whether in legal practice or otherwise. Our purpose is to make the following general points about Australia’s current system of labour regulation and the approach that we believe the Productivity Commission should take in reviewing it: 1. The regime established by the Fair Work Act 2009 (Fair Work Act) is based on a balance or accommodation between competing interests and objectives, arrived at after a lengthy period of change and upheaval in both the conduct and regulation of workplace relations. -
Reported Wage Theft
A fair day’s pay for a fair day’s work? Exposing the true cost of wage theft in Queensland Report No. 9, 56th Parliament Education, Employment and Small Business Committee November 2018 Education, Employment and Small Business Committee Chair Ms Leanne Linard MP, Member for Nudgee Deputy Chair Mrs Jann Stuckey MP, Member for Currumbin Members Mr Bruce Saunders MP, Member for Maryborough Mrs Simone Wilson MP, Member for Pumicestone Mr Michael Healy MP, Member for Cairns Mr Nick Dametto MP, Member for Hinchinbrook Committee Secretariat Telephone +61 7 3553 6657 Fax +61 7 3553 6699 Email [email protected] Committee webpage www.parliament.qld.gov.au/EESBC Acknowledgements The committee acknowledges the contributions of Mr Don Brown MP, who participated in a number of the committee’s hearings and meetings during the inquiry, including many of the committee’s hearings in various regional locations across Queensland. The committee also acknowledges the assistance provided by the Queensland Office of Industrial Relations, the Queensland Parliamentary Library and Research Services, the Fair Work Ombudsman, the Australian Taxation Office, and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. Inquiry into wage theft in Queensland Contents Abbreviations iv Glossary vii Chair’s foreword ix Recommendations x 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Role of the committee 1 1.2 Inquiry referral and process 1 1.3 Submissions 2 1.4 Online survey 2 1.5 Briefings and hearings 2 1.6 Parliamentary privilege and the right of reply 3 1.7 Inquiry material 3 1.8 Inquiry -
'Mad Men': the Fallout from the Qantas Industrial Dispute
OF ‘KAMIKAZES’ AND ‘MAD MEN’: THE FALLOUT FROM THE QANTAS INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE ANTHONY FORSYTH* AND ANDREW STEWART† [The Qantas industrial dispute made headlines around the world, after the airline took the drastic step in October 2011 of grounding its fleet ahead of a proposed lockout of a large proportion of its workforce. Essentially a contest between job security and employ- ment flexibility, the dispute was one of the most significant in Australia for some time. This article examines the origins and circumstances of the Qantas dispute and the issues it highlighted as to the operation of key aspects of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). We conclude that, particularly in light of the federal industrial tribunal’s endorsement of the airline’s strategy and support for the concept of ‘managerial prerogative’, the dispute may have long-term implications for workplace regulation in Australia.] CONTENTS I Introduction .............................................................................................................. 786 II Background to the Qantas Dispute ....................................................................... 789 A The Battlelines Are Drawn: Company and Union Perspectives ........... 789 B The Battle Begins ......................................................................................... 792 III The Dispute Takes Off ............................................................................................. 796 A Qantas’s Grounding and Proposed Lockout ............................................ 796 B The