Final Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Report FINAL REPORT Services for Stage 1's Stakeholder Consultation for Developing the Penang Green Agenda 20 APRIL 2018 TEAM MEMBERS PROGRAM HEAD ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR DR. SAIDATULAKMAL MOHD CONSULTANTS PROFESSOR DR. NARIMAH SAMAT PROFESSOR DR. MAHAMAD HAKIMI IBRAHIM ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR DR MISNI SURIF ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR DR NORIZAN ESA DR. ABDUL RAIS ABDUL LATIFF DR. KHOO SUET LENG DR. LIM EE SHIANG DR. MOHAMAD SHAHARUDIN SAMSURIJAN DR. MUHAMMAD IZZUDIN SYAKIR ISHAK DR. NADHRAH A.KADIR DR. RADIN FIRDAUS RADIN BADARUDDIN DR. SITI RAHYLA RAHMAT TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Acronyms .................................................................................................................... 1 Preamble .................................................................................................................................. 2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ 4 Chapter 1 Overview of Sustainable Development ............................................................... 9 1.1 OVERVIEW OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS (SDGS) .......................................... 11 1.2 PUBLIC AWARENESS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF GOALS (SDGS) ....................... 14 1.3 HOW TO MEASURE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF URBAN AREAS? ....................................... 15 1.3 ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT .............................................................................................. 17 1.4 PROJECTION OF CARBON EMISSION FROM PASSENGER VEHICLES IN PENANG .................. 19 Chapter 2 Study Objectives & Methodology ...................................................................... 27 2.1 STUDY OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE ................................................................................... 27 2.2 STUDY METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................. 27 2.2.1 Literature Review ............................................................................................... 29 2.2.2 Focus Group Discussion and In-Depth Interview .............................................. 30 a. Stakeholders Identification .................................................................................. 30 b. Format ................................................................................................................ 31 c. Transcription ....................................................................................................... 32 2.2.3 Survey ............................................................................................................... 34 a. Design Questionnaire ......................................................................................... 34 b. Training of Enumerators ..................................................................................... 37 c. Pilot Study ........................................................................................................... 38 d. Sampling Frame ................................................................................................. 41 e. Survey Methods .................................................................................................. 43 f. Data Cleaning ...................................................................................................... 45 g. Data analysis ...................................................................................................... 46 2.2.4 Mapping ............................................................................................................. 47 2.2.5 Open Day .......................................................................................................... 47 Chapter 3 Profile of Stakeholders ....................................................................................... 49 3.1 PROFILE OF STAKEHOLDERS INVOLVED IN FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS AND IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS ......................................................................................................................... 49 3.2 PROFILE OF STAKEHOLDERS INVOLVED IN SURVEY ......................................................... 50 i Chapter 4 Current Scenario ................................................................................................. 54 4.1 CURRENT ISSUES ......................................................................................................... 54 4.1.1 Summary Findings from Public Survey ............................................................. 54 a. Public View on Environmental Issues in Penang State ...................................... 54 b. Public Satisfaction on Current Development Issues in Their Area ..................... 58 c. Public Concern on Issues of SDGs (Concern) .................................................... 61 4.1.2 Summary Findings from Focus Group Discussion and In-depth Interview ........ 67 a. Socioeconomic Issues ........................................................................................ 67 b. Built Environment ................................................................................................ 69 c. Waste Management ............................................................................................ 71 d. Transportation .................................................................................................... 72 e. Biodiversity ......................................................................................................... 72 f. Agriculture ........................................................................................................... 73 g. Land Matters ....................................................................................................... 74 h. Energy Security .................................................................................................. 75 i. Disaster ............................................................................................................... 75 j. Institution and Governance .................................................................................. 76 4.1.3 Summary of Current Issues ............................................................................... 78 4.1.4 Location of Development and Environmental Issues in Penang ....................... 82 4.2 CURRENT PRACTICES ................................................................................................... 88 4.2.1 Summary Findings from Public Survey ............................................................. 88 a. Sustainable Initiatives Taken and Practised by the Public .................................. 88 i. Age .................................................................................................................. 88 ii. Income ........................................................................................................... 89 iii. Education ...................................................................................................... 90 iv. District ............................................................................................................ 91 v. Location .......................................................................................................... 92 vi. Survey method .............................................................................................. 93 b. Waste Management Behaviour .......................................................................... 94 i. Age .................................................................................................................. 95 ii. Income ........................................................................................................... 99 iii. Education ...................................................................................................... 99 iv. District .......................................................................................................... 100 v. Location ........................................................................................................ 100 ii vi. Survey method ............................................................................................ 101 c. Transportation Behaviour .................................................................................. 102 d. Water Usage Behaviour ................................................................................... 104 e. Energy Usage Behaviour .................................................................................. 106 f. Green Food Consumption Patterns ................................................................... 109 g. Attitude and Engagement Towards Environmental Domains ........................... 114 4.2.2 Summary Findings from Focus Group Discussions and Interviews ................ 115 a. Socioeconomic Issues ...................................................................................... 115 b. Built Environment .............................................................................................. 116 c. Waste Management .......................................................................................... 123 d. Waste Segregation ........................................................................................... 128 e. Transportation ................................................................................................... 132 f. Biodiversity .......................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Jun 1 -15, 2020 ALVIE CHENG Jk Tdk Kt Akan Kita Tidak, Jika
    Basuh Pakai Perhatikan Penjarakan tangan pelitup gejala sosial dengan muka COVID-19 sabun Jun 1 -15, 2020 Oleh : NORSHAHIDA YUSOFF & WATAWA Undangan Negeri NATAF ZULKIFLI (ADUN) Datuk Keramat Gambar : ALVIE CHENG pada sidang media yang masing-masing diadakan DATUK KERAMAT – Kerajaan pada 13 dan 16 Mei lalu. Persekutuan diharap dapat memulakan kerja- Hadir sama, Ahli kerja fizikal Projek Rancangan Tebatan Parlimen Jelutong, R.S.N. Banjir (RTB) Sungai Pinang secepat mungkin Rayer; Datuk Bandar menjelang Disember ini. bagi Majlis Bandaraya Exco Perumahan, Kerajaan Tempatan Pulau Pinang (MBPP), dan Perancangan Bandar & Desa, Jagdeep Dato’ Ar. Yew Tung Singh Deo berkata bahawa projek tersebut Seang; Pengarah Jabatan telah ditunda sebegitu lama sejak tahun 1999 Kejuruteraan MBPP, Ir. A. sehingga menyebabkan berlakunya kejadian Rajendran; Ahli-ahli Majlis JAGDEEP Singh Deo (kiri sekali) bersama-sama R.S.N. banjir kilat setiap kali hujan lebat ataupun air Pengurusan Komuniti Rayer (kanan sekali), Yusof Yacob (dua dari kanan) dan pasang besar dan terbaru adalah pada 12 Mei Kampung (MPKK) wakil MPKK setempat ketika meninjau kawasan kampung baru-baru ini. setempat dan Pengerusi yang sering dilanda banjir kilat berhampiran Sungai Pinang Menurut beliau, dalam Belanjawan 2017, Kariah Masjid Sheikh di sini pada 16 Mei lalu. Kerajaan Persekutuan telah menyatakan Eusoff, Yusof Yacob. komitmen dengan peruntukan berjumlah Mengulas lanjut, RM150 juta bagi pelaksanaan projek Jagdeep memaklumkan berkaitan. bahawa pakar perunding “RM1 juta daripada kos tersebut telah bagi RTB Sungai Pinang diberikan kepada pihak perunding, yang mana (sebelum pandemik kerja-kerja perundingan telah bermula dan COVID-19) dijangka akan sepatutnya selesai Jun ini… tetapi disebabkan memuktamadkan laporan keadaan politik semasa serta pandemik projek tersebut pada akhir COVID-19 kini, semuanya mungkin tidak Jun ini.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Constitution of Malaysia
    LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT FEDERAL CONSTITUTION Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE REVISION OF LAWS ACT 1968 IN COLLABORATION WITH PERCETAKAN NASIONAL MALAYSIA BHD 2006 Laws of Malaysia FEDERAL CONSTITUTION First introduced as the Constitution … 31 August 1957 of the Federation of Malaya on Merdeka Day Subsequently introduced as the … … 16 September 1963 Constitution of Malaysia on Malaysia Day PREVIOUS REPRINTS First Reprint … … … … … 1958 Second Reprint … … … … … 1962 Third Reprint … … … … … 1964 Fourth Reprint … … … … … 1968 Fifth Reprint … … … … … 1970 Sixth Reprint … … … … … 1977 Seventh Reprint … … … … … 1978 Eighth Reprint … … … … … 1982 Ninth Reprint … … … … … 1988 Tenth Reprint … … … … … 1992 Eleventh Reprint … … … … … 1994 Twelfth Reprint … … … … … 1997 Thirteenth Reprint … … … … … 2002 Fourteenth Reprint … … … … … 2003 Fifteenth Reprint … … … … … 2006 Federal Constitution CONTENTS PAGE ARRANGEMENT OF ARTICLES 3–15 CONSTITUTION 17–208 LIST OF AMENDMENTS 209–211 LIST OF ARTICLES AMENDED 212–229 4 Laws of Malaysia FEDERAL CONSTITUTION NOTE: The Notes in small print on unnumbered pages are not part of the authoritative text. They are intended to assist the reader by setting out the chronology of the major amendments to the Federal Constitution and for editorial reasons, are set out in the present format. Federal Constitution 3 LAWS OF MALAYSIA FEDERAL CONSTITUTION ARRANGEMENT OF ARTICLES PART I THE STATES, RELIGION AND LAW OF THE FEDERATION Article 1. Name, States and territories of the Federation 2. Admission of new territories into the Federation 3. Religion of the Federation 4. Supreme Law of the Federation PART II FUNDAMENTAL LIBERTIES 5. Liberty of the person 6. Slavery and forced labour prohibited 7.
    [Show full text]
  • An Interim Evaluation of Penang's First Bike-Share Scheme
    GEOGRAFIA OnlineTM Malaysian Journal of Society and Space 15 issue 3 (163-175) © 2019, e-ISSN 2682-7727 https://doi.org/10.17576/geo-2019-1503-12 163 An interim evaluation of Penang’s first bike-share scheme Nadhrah A Kadir, Lim Ghee-Thean, Law Chee Hong School of Social Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia Correspondence: Nadhrah A Kadir (email: [email protected]) Received: 23 April 2019; Accepted: 25 July 2019; Published: 22 August 2019 Abstract Bike-sharing schemes are gaining worldwide momentum as a non-motorized transport. The reasons why cities have jumped on the bandwagon of implementing a bike-share system are to reduce traffic congestion, to improve air quality and as an alternative transport option to move around cities. As part of the effort to be “cleaner, greener, healthier and safer,” Penang Island has decided to launch the first bike-share scheme in Penang, making it the first state in Malaysia to ever implement a bike-sharing program with a docking station. While the existing literature on bike-sharing focuses on European and North American cities, less attention is given to experiences in South East Asia, especially small cities in the South East Asia. This paper aims to fill that gap by evaluating the performance of the pioneer of the bike-sharing program in Penang; i.e. the LinkBike. Using the inaugural data from LinkBike’s first annual report, as well as data from personal interviews and grey literature, this paper attempts to understand the performance, opportunities and challenges facing LinkBike in its first year of operation. Essentially, results show that LinkBike was performing quite well considering it was the bike-share pioneer in Penang.
    [Show full text]
  • Teks Ucapan Y.A.B
    TEKS UCAPAN Y.A.B. KETUA MENTERI PULAU PINANG MENGENAI RANG UNDANG-UNDANG PERBEKALAN DAN USUL ANGGARAN PEMBANGUNAN 2009 DI PERSIDANGAN DEWAN UNDANGAN NEGERI PADA 14 NOVEMBER 2008 Y.B. Tuan Speaker, BAJET 2009 Saya mohon mencadangkan supaya rang undang-undang yang bernama “Suatu enakmen bagi menggunakan sejumlah wang daripada Kumpulan Wang Disatukan untuk perkhidmatan bagi tahun 2009 dan bagi memperuntukkan wang itu untuk perkhidmatan tahun itu” dibaca kali kedua. PENDAHULUAN Y.B. Tuan Speaker, 1. Sebelum saya membentangkan Bajet Negeri Pulau Pinang bagi Tahun 2009 di Dewan yang mulia ini, saya ingin mengambil kesempatan di sini untuk mengucapkan ribuan terima kasih kepada Tuan Yang Terutama Yang di-Pertua Negeri yang amat prihatin terhadap kesejahteraan Negeri Pulau Pinang serta sentiasa memberi inspirasi kepada saya dan Kerajaan Negeri dalam menjalankan pentadbiran negeri ini dengan jayanya. Saya juga ingin mengambil kesempatan ini untuk menzahirkan ucapan terima kasih kepada seluruh anggota Kerajaan Negeri dan Persekutuan yang telah memberi kerjasama dan sokongan kepada kerajaan baru ini. 1 2. Ini adalah Bajet pertama Kerajaan Pakatan Rakyat (PR) sejak tsunami politik pada 8hb Mac 2008 yang menumbangkan kerajaan BN selepas memerintah selama 30 tahun. Dengan sokongan hampir 60 peratus pengundi sebanyak 319,757 rakyat Pulau Pinang, PR memperolehi majoriti 2/3 memenangi 29 kerusi berbanding dengan UMNO 11. Ini bukan sahaja menjaminkan kedudukan politik yang kukuh dan stabil tetapi mencerminkan hasrat rakyat yang mahukan perubahan berlandaskan urustadbir baik. 3. Urustadbir baik adalah berdasarkan sistem Cekap, Akauntabiliti dan Telus atau C.A.T. Kita berazam mendirikan sebuah kerajaan bercorak demokrasi, ketuanan rakyat dan kepimpinan beretika yang bersatu di bawah panji nilai-nilai teras universal yang diterima semua iaitu, 5K: kebebasan, keadilan, kebenaran, keluhuran undang-undang dalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan dan ketaqwaan kepada Tuhan.
    [Show full text]
  • Highline Residences Understand Your Credit Report Property Markettrends 2015 Designer
    (w/GST) S$5.80 PRICE: Apr 2015 Apr - Mar Singapore Property Singapore Property International Property Highline Residences Understand Your Credit Report Credit Understand Your Property Market Trends 2015 MarketTrends Property Designer A Property ThatGoesAboveAndBeyond A Property Homes Crowdfunders Magazine Con t e n t s SINGAPORE PROPERTY ANALYSIS 4 Property Market Trends for 2015 6 SRX Residential Property Flash Report (Feb 2015) 9 SRX Residential Property Flash Report (Jan 2015) 11 SRX Residential Property Flash Report (Rental Market) PROPERTY SPOTLIGHT 12 SEA’s First Real Estate Crowdfunding Site CoAssets’ seals S$1 million investment – CoAssets FINANCE 13 Understanding Your Credit Report by Credit Bureau PROPERTY SHOWCASE 20 14 A property that goesAbove and Beyond – Highline Residences 16 A New Level of Inclusiveness – Sims Urban Oasis 18 The New Treasure in Jurong Lake District – Lakeville 20 The Gem of the East – Meridian 38 22 Crown At Robinson INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY ANALYSIS 52 Penang Real Estate Market – Henry Butcher Malaysia Sdn Bhd PROPERTY SHOWCASE 50 Bridging Possibilities In Phnom Penh – The Bridge 22 EVENT 62 Piscine SPLASH! Asia DESIGNER HOMES returns to Singapore and announces new show features 64 Adventure Home - Rezt & Relax Interior 70 Art Party - I-Bridge Design Pte Ltd 74 to Back Cover CROWDFUNDERS Magazine HOMEBUYERS: MCI(P)131/11/2014. ISSN 0129 - 8703 is published Bi-monthly available at bookstores & newstands at S$5.80 (w/GST). Publisher: PROPERTY MEDIA, 808 French Road #07-163 Kitchener Complex Singapore 200808. Tel: (65) 6294 4588 Fax: (65) 6294 5812. Email: [email protected]. (This issue of Homebuyers come with Crowdfunders magazine).
    [Show full text]
  • High-Level Roundtable Discussion on Smart Sustainable Cities World Smart Sustainable Cities Organization
    High-level Roundtable Discussion on Smart Sustainable Cities World Smart Sustainable Cities Organization Mr. Kyong-yul Lee Secretary General WeGO | World Smart Sustainable Cities Organization WHAT IS WeGO? INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF 131 CITIES + 5 NATIONAL ICT INSTITUTIONS + 7 CORPORATE MEMBERS • President City: Seoul • Executive Vice President City: Makati • Vice President Cities: Addis Ababa, Beyoğlu, Ha Noi, Jakarta, Mexico City, Moscow, Ulyanovsk Region • Executive Committee Member Cities: Bucharest, Chengdu, Goyang, Hebron, Khartoum State, Kigali, Nairobi, Pittsburgh, Seberang Perai, Ulaanbaatar • Regional Offices: Asia, Europe, Latin America, Mediterranean • Secretariat: Seoul Global Center 7F, South Korea WeGO | World Smart Sustainable Cities Organization WeGO MEMBERS 20 5 44 65 143 MEMBERS WORLDWIDE VISION: Smart Sustainable Cities for All • Innovative cities that leverage digital technology and connectivity to improve quality of life, efficiency of urban operation and services, and economic prosperity for all citizens, while ensuring long-term economic, social and environmental sustainability MISSION • To promote and facilitate the transformation of cities to Smart Sustainable Cities worldwide; • To be a global platform for cities to enhance their digital capabilities and leverage their innovation potentials in order to develop transformative solutions; and • To foster international exchange, cooperation, and learning among cities. WeGO | World Smart Sustainable Cities Organization WeGO ACTIVITIES 1. Capacity Building 3. Knowledge
    [Show full text]
  • Aspen Group Together with Oxley Holdings Aim to Bring Mixed-Use Integrated Development with Modern Conveniences to Air Itam
    PRESS RELEASE - FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Aspen Group together with Oxley Holdings aim to bring mixed-use integrated development with modern conveniences to Air Itam ▪ The Group together with Oxley Holdings Limited are investing RM165 mil to acquire a total of 7 pieces of freehold land measuring 29.05 acres (1.27 million sq ft) in Paya Terubong via a conditional sale and purchase agreement with Geo Valley Sdn Bhd ▪ The proposed development is a mixed-use development comprising residential towers, service apartments, retail lots and a community centre ▪ The land is strategically located within a matured suburban township serving a community as many as 400,000 people. ▪ The development will benefit from existing daily lifestyle amenities and well- connected excellent infrastructure in a matured residential township, including the ongoing Jalan Bukit Kukus Highway Project which will eventually link the Air Itam township to the FTZ area of Bayan Lepas, Penang International Airport and two Penang Bridges via the future Pan Island Link Singapore, 22 June 2019 – Aspen (Group) Holdings Limited (“Aspen” and together with its subsidiaries, the “Group”), today announced that its subsidiary company, Aspen Park Hills Sdn Bhd signed a conditional sales and purchase agreement with Geo Valley Sdn. Bhd., to acquire a total of seven pieces of freehold land measuring 29.05 acres in Paya Terubong for RM165mil. Geo Valley Sdn. Bhd. will also invest 25% equity in Aspen Park Hills Sdn Bhd. Parts of the land are currently approved by the local council for mixed development and for the construction of part of the Jalan Bukit Kukus paired road linking Thean Teik Highway from Air Itam to Jalan Paya Terubong.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Management Plan
    6 -1 CHAPTER 6 SPATIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN The Spatial Management Plan is a basic framework that drives the translation of national strategic directions to the state level. The Spatial Management Plan consist of aspects related to spatial Three (3) Types of State Spatial availability (land use and transportation), growth areas (Conurbation, Management Plan Promoted Development Zone, Catalyst Centre and Agropolitan Centre), settlement hierarchies, resource management (forest, water, food, Spatial Growth Framework energy source and other natural resources) and disaster risk areas 1 Plan (tsunami, flood, landslide, coastal erosion and rise in sea level). Resource Management Plan A Spatial Management Plan at the state level is prepared to translate 2 national strategic directions to the state level (all states in Peninsular Natural Disaster Risk Area Malaysia, Sabah and Labuan Federal Territory) especially for strategic 3 Management Plan directions that have direct implications on a spatial aspect such as: . 1. Growth and development of cities as well as rural areas that is balanced and integrated (PD1 and PD 2); 2. Connectivity and access that is enhanced and sustainable (PD3); 3. Sustainable management of natural resources, food resources and State Spatial Management Plan heritage resources (KD1); involve the following states: 4. Management of risk areas (KD2); 5. Low carbon cities and sustainable infrastructure (KD3); and 1. Perlis pp. 6 - 8 6. Inclusive community development (KI1, KI2 and KI3). 2. Kedah pp. 6 - 14 3. Pulau Pinang pp. 6 - 20 This management plan shall become the basis for planning growth areas, conservation of resource areas as well as ensuring planning 4. Perak pp. 6 - 26 takes into account risks of natural disaster.
    [Show full text]
  • Whose Opinion Matters: Lessons from a Stakeholder Engagement
    WHOSE OPINION MATTERS: LESSONS Minal Pathak FROM A STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PROCESS FOR PENANG, MALAYSIA WHOSE OPINION MATTERS: LESSONS FROM A STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PROCESS FOR PENANG, MALAYSIA by Minal Pathak MIT-UTM Malaysia Sustainable Cities Program Massachusetts Institute of Technology Abstract Transportation-related decisions, like many other public policy issues, are complex. They involve multiple stakeholders, often with conflicting interests, and influence multiple sustainability dimensions over space and time. In response to this complexity, governments often make decisions based mainly on advice from experts, offering limited opportunities for public participation in the decision making process. This study examines stakeholder involvement in a transportation plan in Penang, Malaysia. The study employs a qualitative methodology and uses select indicators to evaluate the engagement process. Despite a concerted effort to engage the public, the government failed to resolve conflicts with key stakeholder groups. Three key findings emerge from the assessment: first, a poorly designed process can be counterproductive, resulting in delays and loss of trust; second, involving stakeholders at a later stage limits opportunities for meaningful stakeholder contribution; and third, stakeholder groups can mobilize and shift the balance of political power. For all these reasons and more, decisions in the public arena must go beyond meeting the mandated requirements, and move towards a deliberative process aiming for shared decision-making. The study proposes a set of recommendations for a more effective process. Introduction Urban transportation decisions involve multiple stakeholders and agencies, often with conflicting interests. Increasingly, policy makers are faced with the challenge of balancing immediate concerns—for example, improving mobility—with long-term sustainability concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • CPI Land to Launch Tuan Residency in Jan 2018
    A PULLOUT EVERY FRIDAY WITH FRIDAY, DECEMBER 22, 2017 . ISSUE 2559/2017 . PP19055/06/2016(034530) PRINT + DIGITAL EP EP EP 04 05 07 available NEWS FEATURE DEALMAKERS online + offl ine Ibraco to Johor and More where do i get a copy of this weekly pullout? launch Melaka see than just RM1.5b mixed sharp rise knowledge go to development in land and www.EdgeProp.my in Kuching auctions network to download for free ROCK SOLID Decades-old shoplots in Damansara Jaya, Petaling Jaya, have held their rents and values well in the current soft market environment. See Pages 6 and 7. PEPEJABATJABAT URURUSANUSAN DDJJ PEPEJABATJABAT / OOFFICEFFICE SDN.SDN. BHDBHD.. STUDIO D’JAYA RESTORAN KAFE DAN RESTORAN KEDAI BUKU DAN KAFE CK KAMPAR CLAYPOT RICE LEPAK-LEPAK DJ EXPRESSO 金金寶瓦煲雞飯寶瓦煲雞飯 NYONYA DAMANSARA JAYA BUKA OOPENPEN EP 2 FRIDAY DECEMBER 22, 2017 • THEEDGE FINANCIAL DAILY NEWS HIGHLIGHTS from www.EdgeProp.my Le Meridien owner buys Hilton KL for Forest City RM497m sets up KL Japanese billionaire Katsumi Tada sales gallery has sold Hilton Kuala Lumpur Ho- tel (Hilton KL) in KL Sentral for Country Garden Pacificview Sdn ¥13.7 billion (RM497 million), to Bhd has opened a new sales gallery the owner of the hotel right next to for its massive Forest City develop- it — the Le Meridien Kuala Lumpur. ment in Iskandar Malaysia, Johor, Le Meridien is owned by a com- at UBN Tower in Kuala Lumpur. pany founded by Tada in 1974 — Country Garden Pacifi cview is a Daito Trust Construction Co Ltd. joint venture between Country Gar- Tada is said to have cut ties with den Holdings Co Ltd and Esplanade Daito in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Kuala Lumpur a State 85 Kuala Lumpur – City-State of the Future? 88
    Contents Executive Director’s Note 3 Section 1: Evaluation of Local Authorities in Malaysia History of Local Govornment Election in Malaysia 6 Revisiting the Athi Nahappan Report Part 1 16 Section 2: Separation of Powers Between the Three Levels of Government The Malaysian Federation: A Contradiction in Terms? 21 How Incompetency in Local Governments Help to Preserve Political Hegemony in Malaysia 25 Double Decentralisation: The Way Forward for Sabah 30 Section 3: Governance in Our Local Authorities Strength from the Grassroots: Practices of Participatory Governance 35 Communications as a Key Competency 39 It’s All About the Money 43 Understanding Local Authority Financial Reports 46 Section 4: Running Our Cities & Towns BRT: Rethinking Expensive Public Transport Projects in Malaysian Cities 51 An Aged-Friendly City For All - Rich or Poor 54 The Truth behind Solid Waste Management and Incinerators 59 A Lucrative Dirty Business 62 The Road Less Taken 68 Section 5: Revisiting the Local Government Election Revisiting the Athi Nahappan Report Part 2 : Recommendations 73 Will Local Government Elections Erode Malay Rights? 79 Local Democracy: More Politics or Less? 82 Beyond Local Government: Making Kuala Lumpur a State 85 Kuala Lumpur – City-State of the Future? 88 Issue 1, 2015 - pg. 1 REFSA QUARTERLY Editorial Team Executive Director | Steven Sim Chee Keong Deputy Executive Director | Wong Shu Qi Editor | Lam Choong Wah Assistant Editor | Rosalind Chua Intern | Yap Lay Sheng Layout Design | PM Wang Published by Research For Social Advancement Bhd (Refsa) 2nd Floor,Block A Wenworth Building Jalan Yew, Off Jalan Pudu 55100 Kuala Lumpur. Tel: 03 9285 5808 Fax: 03 92818104 Executive Director’s Note By Steven Sim Executive Director, REFSA Local authorities are fertile grounds for mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Soalan Lisan Brtlis Yb
    NEGERI PULAU PINANG MINIT PERSIDANGAN MESYUARAT PERTAMA PENGGAL PERSIDANGAN KELIMA DEWAN UNDANGAN NEGERI PULAU PINANG YANG KETIGA BELAS 19 MEI 2017, 22 MEI 2017 HINGGA 25 MEI 2017 Dikeluarkan oleh PEJABAT SETIAUSAHA KERAJAAN BAHAGIAN DEWAN UNDANGAN NEGERI PULAU PINANG 1 MESYUARAT PERTAMA PENGGAL PERSIDANGAN KELIMA DEWAN UNDANGAN NEGERI PULAU PINANG YANG KETIGA BELAS Kandungan Muka Surat Minit Persidangan 19 Mei 2017 (Jumaat) 3 Minit Persidangan 22 Mei 2017 (Isnin) 12 Minit Persidangan 23 Mei 2017 (Selasa) 80 Minit Persidangan 24 Mei 2017 (Rabu) 85 Minit Persidangan 25 Mei 2017 (Khamis) 91 2 MINIT PERSIDANGAN MESYUARAT PERTAMA PENGGAL PERSIDANGAN KELIMA DEWAN UNDANGAN NEGERI PULAU PINANG YANG KETIGA BELAS Tarikh : 19 MEI 2017(JUMAAT) Masa : 9.30 Pagi Tempat : Dewan Undangan Negeri Lebuh Light, George Town Pulau Pinang. HADIR Bil. Nama Ahli Kawasan 1. Y.A.B. Lim Guan Eng Ketua Menteri / Air Putih 2. YB. Dato' Law Choo Kiang Yang di-Pertua Dewan Undangan Negeri 3. YB. Dato' Haji Mohd Rashid Bin Hasnon Timbalan Ketua Menteri I/ Pantai Jerejak 4. YB. Prof. Dr. P. Ramasamy A/L Palanisamy Timbalan Ketua Menteri II/Perai 5. YB. Chow Kon Yeow Padang Kota 6. YB. Dato' Haji Abdul Malik Bin Abul Kassim Batu Maung 7. YB. Chong Eng Padang Lalang 8. YB. Lim Hock Seng Bagan Jermal 9. YB. Law Heng Kiang Batu Lancang 10. YB. Phee Boon Poh Sungai Puyu 11. YB. Jagdeep Singh Deo A/L Karpal Singh Datok Keramat 12. YB. Dr. Afif Bin Bahardin Seberang Jaya 13. YB. Dato' Haji Maktar Bin Haji Shapee Timbalan Yang di-Pertua Dewan Undangan Negeri/Sungai Bakap 14.
    [Show full text]