FILE NO. 130612 Petitions and Communications Received From
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
FILE NO. 130612 Petitions and Communications received from June 3, 2013, through June 10, 2013, for reference by the President to Committee considering related matters, or to be ordered filed by the Clerk on June 18, 2013. Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information will not be redacted. From Superior Court of California, submitting 2012-2013 Civil Grand Jury report entitled, “Are the Wheels Moving Forward?” Copy: Each Supervisor, Clerk of the Board, Legislative Deputy, Government Audit & Oversight Committee Clerk, Legislation Clerk. (1) *From Office of Budget and Legislative Analyst, submitting Housing Authority performance audit. (2) From concerned citizens, regarding fiber broadband. 3 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (3) From Library Users Association, regarding the Public Library evening hours. Copy: Each Supervisor, Clerk of the Board. (4) From A. Alberto Castillio Abello, regarding proposed reduction to health services for FYs 2013-2014 and 2014-2015. File No. 130595. Copy: Each Supervisor. (5) From concerned citizens, regarding Pier 70 Waterfront Site. File No. 130495. 3 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor, Budget & Finance Committee Clerk. (6) From concerned citizens, regarding Vibrant Castro Neighborhood Alliance petition. 11 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (7) From Randolph Badler, Ph.D., regarding construction parking permits. Copy: Each Supervisor, Legislative Aides. (8) From Sid Castro, regarding sale of taxi medallions. Copy: Each Supervisor. (9) From Marvis J. Phillips, regarding liquor license transfer for 1552 Polk Street. File No. 130307. Copy: Each Supervisor, Neighborhood Services & Safety Committee Clerk. (10) From concerned citizens, regarding the Central Subway. 2 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor, Budget & Finance Committee Clerk. (11) From concerned citizens, regarding condominium conversion legislation. File Nos. 120669 and 130480. 2 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor, Land Use & Economic Development Committee Clerk. (12) From Gary Pegueros, regarding the Neighborhood Energy Response Team program. Copy: Each Supervisor. (13) From Paul Timothy Diaz, regarding bacterial meningitis prevention. Copy: Each Supervisor. (14) From Office of the Controller, regarding report on the Status of Civil Grand Jury Recommendations, FY2003-2004 through FY2011-2012. Copy: Each Supervisor, Land Use & Economic Development Committee Clerk. (15) Intentionally left blank (16) From San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, regarding updates on ongoing labor negotiations. Copy: Each Supervisor. (17) From concerned citizens, submitting support for reappointment of Kimberly Brandon to the Port Commission. File No. 130504. 2 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor, Rules Committee Clerk. (18) From Sierra Club, submitting support for the appointment of Hulda Garfolo to the Ethics Commission. Copy: Each Supervisor. (19) From International Bottled Water Association and the California Bottled Water Association regarding bottle refilling stations legislation. File No. 120488. Copy: Each Supervisor. (20) *(An asterisked item represents the cover sheet to a document that exceeds 25 pages. The complete document is available at the Clerk’s Office, Room 244, City Hall.) June 5, 2013 Angela Calvillo 1 City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place ~ C.Jl Room 244 San Francisco, CA 94102 Dear Ms. Calvillo, C::> The 2012 -2013 Civil Grand Jury will release its report entitled, "Are the Wheels Moving Forward? A Follow-Up to the 2009-2010 Civil Grand Jury Report: Sharing the Roadway - From Confrontation to Conversation," to the public on June 10, 2013. Enclosed is an advance copy of this report. Please note that by order of the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court, Hon. Cynthia Ming-mei Lee, this report is to be kept confidential until the date of release. California Penal Code §933.5 requires a response to the Presiding Judge no later than September 9, 2013. For each finding in the report, you must either (1) agree with the finding; or (2) disagree with it, wholly or partially, and explain why. Further, as to each recommendation, your response must either indicate: 1) That the recommendation has been implemented, with a summary of how it was implemented; 2) That the recommendation has not been, but will be, implemented in the future, with a timeframe for implementation; 3) That the recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation of the scope of that analysis and a timeframe for discussion, not more than six months from the release of the report; or 4) That the recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or reasonable, with an explanation. (California Penal Code § 933 and §933.05) Please provide your response to Presiding Judge Lee at the address below. Very truly yours, fltti ftfJI d-(Jhtp'l2 Martha M. Mangold, Foreperson 2012 - 2013 Civil Grand Jury 400 McAllister Street, Room 008 San Francisco, CA 94102-4512 Phone: 415-551-3605 Are the Wheels Moving Forward? A Follow-Up to the 2009-2010 Civil Grand Jury Report Sharing the Roadway: From Confrontation to Conversation May 2013 City and County of San Francisco Civil Grand Jury, 2012-2013 City and County of San Francisco 2012-2013 Civil Grand Jury MEMBERS OF THE 2012-2013 CIVIL GRAND JURY CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Martha Mangold, Foreperson Fred A. Rodriguez, Foreperson Pro Tern Leslie Finlev, Recording Secretary Maria Martinez, Corresponding Secretary Jon Anderson Jennifer Angelo Jeanne Barr Paul Cheng Jerry Dratler Hulda E. Garfolo D. Peter Gleichenhaus Shelly Hing Corinna Kaarlela Daniel Kreps Hilary Pedigo Theresa Sabella Suzanne Tucker Thomas Walker Stuart Williams 2 Are the Wheels Moving Forward? :-:t_ .. __ ·...• -z.-.. ··.- ·---·· .., •" City and County of San Francisco - . .; ~-~ < - 2012-2013 Civil Grand Jury THE)cCIVIL GRAND JURY The Civil Grand Jury is a government oversight panel of volunteers who serve for one year. It makes findings and recommendations resulting from its investigations. Reports of the Civil Grand Jury ·do not identify individuals by name. Disclosure of information about individuals interviewed by the jury is prohibited. California Penal Code, section 929 . STATE LAW REQUIREMENT California Penal Code, section 933.05 Each published report includes a list of those public entities that are required to respond to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court within 60 to 90 days, as specified. A copy must be sent to the Board of Supervisors. All responses are made available to the public. For each finding the response must: I) agree with the finding, or 2) disagree with it, wholly or partially, and explain why. As to each recommendation the responding party must report that: I) the recommendation has been implemented, with a summary explanation; or 2) the recommendation has not been implemented but will be within a set timeframe as provided; or 3) the recommendation requires further analysis. The officer or agency head must define what additional study is needed. The Grand Jury expects a progress report within six months; or 4) the recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or reasonable, with an explanation. 3 Are the Wheels Moving Forward? City and County of San Francisco 2012-2013 Civil Grand Jury -------------·----·---- ----- - -------·-·· Table of Contents Issue ........................................................................................................................ , ........... 5 Summary ............... :............................................................................................................. 5 Background ......................................................................................................................... 7 Investigation ........................................................ :··················· ............................................ 8 1. Bicycling & Education: Building Awareness for Safer Streets ............................. 8 National Trends in Education and Training ............................................................ 8 San Francisco Bicycle Coalition Education Programs ........................................... 9 Increased Efforts to Make Biking Safe ................................................................. 11 2. Enforcement: Monitoring City Streets ................................ , ................................ 13 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 15 Findings and Recommendations ....................................................................................... 17 · Education .................................................................................................................. 17 Enforcement .............................................................................................................. 18 Response Matrix ............................................................................................................... 19 Methodology ............ , ......................................................................................................... 21 Bibliography ........................................................................................ , .................... 22 Appendix l ........................................................................................................... ;-.... 23 Appe.ndix 2 ................................................................................................................