DOCSLIB.ORG

2006-07 Report from the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute April 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2006-07 Report from the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute April 2008 Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Annual Report for 2006-2007 I. Overview of Activities……………………………………………………........ 3 New Developments………………………………………………….. 3 Scientific Program and Workshops………………………………….. 5 Program Highlights………………………………………………….. 11 MSRI Experiences…………………………………………………… 15 II. Programs……………………………………………………………………….. 24 Program Participant List……………………………………………. 25 Participant Summary………………………………………………… 29 Publication List……………………………………………………… 30 III. Postdoctoral Placement……………………………………………………....... 35 IV. Summer Graduate Workshops………………………………………………… 36 Graduate Student Summary…………………………………………. 39 V. Undergraduate Program………………………………………………………… 40 Undergraduate Student Summary……………………………………. 41 VI. External Financial Support…………………………………………………….. 42 VII. Committee Membership……………………………………………………….. 47 VIII. Appendix - Final Reports…………………………………………………......... 49 Programs………………………………………………………………. 49 Geometric Evolution Equations and Related Topics…………... 49 Computational Applications of Algebraic Topology…………... 63 Dynamical Systems…………………………………………….. 70 Workshops……………………………………………………………… 80 Connections for Women: Computational Applications of Algebraic Topology…………………………………………….. 80 MSRI Short Course: An Introduction to Multiscale Methods….. 88 Connections for Women: Geometric Analysis and Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations…………………………... 90 Recent Developments in Numerical Methods and Algorithms for Geometric Evolution Equations….………………… 91 Lectures on String(y) Topology………………………………... 94 Introductory Workshop: New Topological Structures in Physics………………………………………………… 99 Training Program in String Topology…………………………. 104 CMI/MSRI Hot Topics Workshop: Modularity for GL(2) and Beyond………………………………………….. 108 CMI/MSRI Hot Topics Workshop: Minimal and Canonical Models in Algebraic Geometry………………………. 121 CMI/MSRI Hot Topics Workshop: Advances in Algebra and Geometry……………………………………………… 130 Summer Graduate Workshop: Data Assimilation for the Carbon Cycle………………………………………….. 140 Workshop Participant List…………………………………………….. 146 3 Annual 2006-07 Report from the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute April 2008 This annual report covers MSRI projects and activities that have been concluded since the submission of the last full report in May 2006 and the interim 2006-07 report in May 2007. New Developments The year 2006-07 saw a very rich scientific program. By August 1, 2007, MSRI was comfortably resettled in its greatly expanded quarters, financed through private fund- raising. Improvements to the older part of the building, and the acquisition of appropriate furniture and equipment continued through the year. One consequence was that the Institute could run a more robust program of workshops, often in collaboration with other organizations, since in the expanded quarters the major programs are no longer disrupted by concurrent scientific events. MSRI continues to monitor and improve the balance of non-scientific staff needed to host these scientific events. The new auditorium and expanded public facilities made it possible to accommodate much larger groups for workshops. This expanded capacity was fully utilized by the large cohorts that attended the two “Hot Topics” workshops (more on these later), the “Algebra & Geometry” workshop, and the “Critical Issues in Education” workshop. While it is too soon to detect a trend, participation in programmatic workshops appears to be significantly increasing as well, which would serve to expand the impact of MSRI’s core research programs. A significant new program that does not show up in the list below but augments the science of the programs is the Simons Biology Colloquium. The Colloquium brought four famous biologists with a mathematical bent to MSRI, each for a one week stay involving 2-4 major lectures during the spring semester of 2007: Arnold Levine, Mimi Koehl, Robert Schleif, and Sydney Brenner. The biologists had interactions, in particular, with members of the Dynamical Systems program (see below). The long-term goal is to stimulate interactions of mathematics and biology by engaging the mathematicians at MSRI with some biological problems and making the Institute better known to the biological world; this may eventually lead to other sorts of programs with more intense and programmed interactions. The Colloquium, which has substantial funding from the Simons Foundation, will continue in 2007-08. Another new area for MSRI was the involvement in Climate research, beginning with a summer graduate workshop in July 2006 (joint with the National Center for Atmospheric Research), and continuing with the "Symposium on Climate Change: From Global Predictions to Local Action" that took place in April 2007. The series will continue with a Summer School in July 2007, and is expected to lead to future activities of larger scale. 4 The following summary of demographic data can also be viewed in detail later in this report. In its 2006-07 workshops, MSRI hosted 2439 separate visits (some visitors attended multiple events). 2062 participants gave us gender data. Of these 588 or 28.5%, were females. There were 109 self-reported under-represented minorities. In its 2006-07 programs, MSRI had a total of 196 members. All but one member provided gender data. Of these, 34 or 17.4% were female. 3 members were black; there were no self-identified Hispanic/Latino or Native American members, although it should be recognized that half the members declined to state Hispanic/Latino ancestry. It should recognized that the data are “noisy.” (People choose not to fill out those spaces on the forms; for some reason they are more reluctant to specify racial and ethnic data than gender data.) We now turn to the fundamental scientific programs and workshops that make MSRI such an intensely active center. There are too many to describe in detail in this space, but a listing of topics will give an idea of what has been going on. Two types of workshops may need a little explanation: 1. “Connections for Women”. While MSRI had hosted occasional “workshops for women” in the past, it was decided last year to have a “Connections for Women” workshop at the start of every semester- or year-long program, following a suggestion from then-Trustee Joyce McLaughlin. Starting with August 2006, one of these workshops now immediately precedes every MSRI Introductory Workshop. Its goal is to increase the numbers and cohesiveness of the women in the introductory workshops and, ultimately, in the whole program. The format is simple: there are scientific lectures (to which both men and women are invited and come) and networking events (to which only the women are invited). Within these parameters, formats chosen by the organizers of Connections workshops vary widely and it is not yet clear whether one can identify a “best model,” particularly since feedback from the participants has been very positive independent of format. MSRI pays some expenses for a number of women to attend, and attendance is generally in the 15-25 range. The women attending are encouraged, and supported to a significant degree, to attend the following Introductory Workshop. It should be noted that the “Connections” workshops continue to remain controversial with some female mathematicians, including potential organizers. 2. “Hot Topics” Workshops. Instituted in 2000, these are events that are planned with little lead time -- typically just 3 or 4 months -- to focus on some rapidly developing breakthrough. MSRI has averaged about one per year, though in 2006-07 there were two. The workshops gather the super-specialists to talk with each other intensely over a week and push hard on the frontier of research. The first Hot Topics workshop was titled “GL(2) and Beyond.” It goal was to spur advances in proving modularity of objects, taking off from the fact that the past few years have seen three outstanding modularity conjectures settled in a large number of cases: Serre's conjectures on mod p Galois representations; the Fontaine-Mazur conjecture for p-adic Galois representations; and the 5 Sato-Tate conjecture for elliptic curves. The aim of this workshop was to summarize the results and techniques in these directions and to sketch out a research program that will take us from GL(2) to unitary groups of higher rank. The meeting was capped by a lecture by Robert P. Langlands in which he outlined his hopes that application of techniques of analytic number theory to the trace formula would lead to proofs of his functoriality conjectures in situations inaccessible to other available techniques. The year's second Hot Topics Workshop, “Minimal and Canonical Models”, compared the two proposed proofs of the Finite Generation of the Canonical Ring (a completion of the Mori Program, in all dimensions, and more!) in a very useful way. Scientific Program and Workshops A. Major Programs and their associated workshops: There were three major Programs for the MSRI fiscal year 2006-07, and fourteen workshops associated to them: 1. Geometric Evolution Equations and Related Topics August 14, 2006 to May 25, 2007, organized by Bennett Chow, Panagiota Daskalopoulos, Gerhardt Huisken, Peter Li, Lei Ni, and Gang Tian. The focus was on geometric evolution equations, function theory, and related elliptic and parabolic equations. With serendipitous timing, this program was positioned to capitalize on the spectacular recent work of Perelman and earlier work of Hamilton on Ricci flow relating to the Poincaré and geometrization conjectures. The year-long program focused
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Topological Pattern Recognition for Point Cloud Data∗
    Acta Numerica (2014), pp. 289–368 c Cambridge University Press, 2014 doi:10.1017/S0962492914000051 Printed in the United Kingdom Topological pattern recognition for point cloud data∗ Gunnar Carlsson† Department of Mathematics, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA E-mail: [email protected] In this paper we discuss the adaptation of the methods of homology from algebraic topology to the problem of pattern recognition in point cloud data sets. The method is referred to as persistent homology, and has numerous applications to scientific problems. We discuss the definition and computation of homology in the standard setting of simplicial complexes and topological spaces, then show how one can obtain useful signatures, called barcodes, from finite metric spaces, thought of as sampled from a continuous object. We present several different cases where persistent homology is used, to illustrate the different ways in which the method can be applied. CONTENTS 1 Introduction 289 2 Topology 293 3 Shape of data 311 4 Structures on spaces of barcodes 331 5 Organizing data sets 343 References 365 1. Introduction Deriving knowledge from large and complex data sets is a fundamental prob- lem in modern science. All aspects of this problem need to be addressed by the mathematical and computational sciences. There are various dif- ferent aspects to the problem, including devising methods for (a) storing massive amounts of data, (b) efficiently managing it, and (c) developing un- derstanding of the data set. The past decade has seen a great deal of devel- opment of powerful computing infrastructure, as well as methodologies for ∗ Colour online for monochrome figures available at journals.cambridge.org/anu.
    [Show full text]
  • Alejandro Adem
    Latinxs and Hispanics in Mathematical Sciences Alejandro Adem Dr. Alejandro Adem is a Professor of Mathematics at the University of British Colum- bia in Vancouver, Canada. Since 2015, he is also CEO and Scientific Director of Mitacs, a non-profit Canadian organization focused on developing university/indus- try connections through internships for graduate students. Dr. Adem received his BS from the National University of México in 1982, and his Ph.D from Princeton University in 1986. He held a Szegö Assistant Professorship at Stanford University (1986–89) and held a faculty position at the University of Wis- consin-Madison from 1989 to 2004, where he served as Chair of the Department of Mathematics from 1999 to 2002. He was appointed as a Canada Research Chair in “In my opinion this is a great AlgeBraic Topology at the University of British ColumBia in 2004 and served as Di- occasion to celebrate the rector of the Pacific Institute for the Mathematical Sciences from 2008 to 2015. wonderful mathematical Dr. Alejandro Adem has held visiting positions at the Institute for Advanced Study in contributions of the Hispanic Princeton, the ETH-Zurich, the Max Planck Institute in Bonn, the University of Paris community. Our challenge is VII and XIII, and Princeton University. He is a highly regarded researcher in mathe- to ensure that our students matics, with many publications in his name; he has delivered over 300 invited lec- get the best opportunities to tures aBout his research around the world and supervised a multitude of Ph.D. stu- fully engage in the beauty dents and postdocs.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Curriculum Vitae Alejandro ADEM Mathematics Department, University of British Columbia Vancouver BC V6T 1Z2, Canada http://www.math.ubc.ca/∼adem https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9126-6546 Education: 1982{1986 Ph.D. Mathematics, Princeton University 1979{1982 B.Sc. Mathematics, National University of Mexico Awards: 2017 Corresponding Member, Mexican Academy of Sciences 2015 Jeffery–Williams Research Prize, Canadian Mathematical Society 2015 Ten Most Influential Hispanic{Canadians 2012 Fellow of the American Mathematical Society 2004 Canada Research Chair in Algebraic Topology 2003 Vilas Associate Award, University of Wisconsin{Madison 1995 H. I. Romnes Faculty Fellowship, Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation 1992 U.S. National Science Foundation Young Investigator Award (NYI) 1985 Alfred P. Sloan Doctoral Dissertation Fellowship Employment: 2015- CEO and Scientific Director, Mitacs, Inc. 2005- Professor and Canada Research Chair, Mathematics Department, UBC 2008-2015 Director, Pacific Institute for the Mathematical Sciences 2005-2008 Deputy Director, Pacific Institute for the Mathematical Sciences 1999-2002 Chair, Department of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin{Madison 1996-2006 Professor, Department of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin{Madison 1992-1996 Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin{Madison 1989-1992 Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin{Madison 1989-1990 Member, School of Mathematics, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton NJ 1986-1989 Szeg¨o Assistant Professor,
    [Show full text]
  • Caucher Birkar — from Asylum Seeker to Fields Medal Winner at Cambridge
    MATHS, 1 Caucher Birkar, 41, at VERSION Cambridge University, photographed by Jude Edginton REPR O OP HEARD THE ONE ABOUT THE ASYLUM SEEKER SUBS WHO WANDERED INTO A BRITISH UNIVERSITY... A RT AND CAME OUT A MATHS SUPERSTAR? PR ODUCTION CLIENT Caucher Birkar grew up in a Kurdish peasant family in a war zone and arrived in Nottingham as a refugee – now he has received the mathematics equivalent of the Nobel prize. By Tom Whipple BLACK YELLOW MAGENTA CYAN 91TTM1940232.pgs 01.04.2019 17:39 MATHS, 2 VERSION ineteen years ago, the mathematics Caucher Birkar in Isfahan, Receiving the Fields Medal If that makes sense, congratulations: you department at the University of Iran, in 1999 in Rio de Janeiro, 2018 now have a very hazy understanding of Nottingham received an email algebraic geometry. This is the field that from an asylum seeker who Birkar works in. wanted to talk to someone about The problem with explaining maths is REPR algebraic geometry. not, or at least not always, the stupidity of his They replied and invited him in. listeners. It is more fundamental than that: O OP N So it was that, shortly afterwards, it is language. Mathematics is not designed Caucher Birkar, the 21-year-old to be described in words. It is designed to be son of a Kurdish peasant family, described in mathematics. This is the great stood in front of Ivan Fesenko, a professor at triumph of the subject. It was why a Kurdish Nottingham, and began speaking in broken asylum seeker with bad English could convince SUBS English.
    [Show full text]
  • Topology and Data
    BULLETIN (New Series) OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 46, Number 2, April 2009, Pages 255–308 S 0273-0979(09)01249-X Article electronically published on January 29, 2009 TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON 1. Introduction An important feature of modern science and engineering is that data of various kinds is being produced at an unprecedented rate. This is so in part because of new experimental methods, and in part because of the increase in the availability of high powered computing technology. It is also clear that the nature of the data we are obtaining is significantly different. For example, it is now often the case that we are given data in the form of very long vectors, where all but a few of the coordinates turn out to be irrelevant to the questions of interest, and further that we don’t necessarily know which coordinates are the interesting ones. A related fact is that the data is often very high-dimensional, which severely restricts our ability to visualize it. The data obtained is also often much noisier than in the past and has more missing information (missing data). This is particularly so in the case of biological data, particularly high throughput data from microarray or other sources. Our ability to analyze this data, both in terms of quantity and the nature of the data, is clearly not keeping pace with the data being produced. In this paper, we will discuss how geometry and topology can be applied to make useful contributions to the analysis of various kinds of data.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Andrew J. Wiles
    ISSN 0002-9920 (print) ISSN 1088-9477 (online) of the American Mathematical Society March 2017 Volume 64, Number 3 Women's History Month Ad Honorem Sir Andrew J. Wiles page 197 2018 Leroy P. Steele Prize: Call for Nominations page 195 Interview with New AMS President Kenneth A. Ribet page 229 New York Meeting page 291 Sir Andrew J. Wiles, 2016 Abel Laureate. “The definition of a good mathematical problem is the mathematics it generates rather Notices than the problem itself.” of the American Mathematical Society March 2017 FEATURES 197 239229 26239 Ad Honorem Sir Andrew J. Interview with New The Graduate Student Wiles AMS President Kenneth Section Interview with Abel Laureate Sir A. Ribet Interview with Ryan Haskett Andrew J. Wiles by Martin Raussen and by Alexander Diaz-Lopez Allyn Jackson Christian Skau WHAT IS...an Elliptic Curve? Andrew Wiles's Marvelous Proof by by Harris B. Daniels and Álvaro Henri Darmon Lozano-Robledo The Mathematical Works of Andrew Wiles by Christopher Skinner In this issue we honor Sir Andrew J. Wiles, prover of Fermat's Last Theorem, recipient of the 2016 Abel Prize, and star of the NOVA video The Proof. We've got the official interview, reprinted from the newsletter of our friends in the European Mathematical Society; "Andrew Wiles's Marvelous Proof" by Henri Darmon; and a collection of articles on "The Mathematical Works of Andrew Wiles" assembled by guest editor Christopher Skinner. We welcome the new AMS president, Ken Ribet (another star of The Proof). Marcelo Viana, Director of IMPA in Rio, describes "Math in Brazil" on the eve of the upcoming IMO and ICM.
    [Show full text]
  • Looking at Earth: an Astronaut's Journey Induction Ceremony 2017
    american academy of arts & sciences winter 2018 www.amacad.org Bulletin vol. lxxi, no. 2 Induction Ceremony 2017 Class Speakers: Jane Mayer, Ursula Burns, James P. Allison, Heather K. Gerken, and Gerald Chan Annual David M. Rubenstein Lecture Looking at Earth: An Astronaut’s Journey David M. Rubenstein and Kathryn D. Sullivan ALSO: How Are Humans Different from Other Great Apes?–Ajit Varki, Pascal Gagneux, and Fred H. Gage Advancing Higher Education in America–Monica Lozano, Robert J. Birgeneau, Bob Jacobsen, and Michael S. McPherson Redistricting and Representation–Patti B. Saris, Gary King, Jamal Greene, and Moon Duchin noteworthy Select Prizes and Andrea Bertozzi (University of James R. Downing (St. Jude Chil- Barbara Grosz (Harvard Univer- California, Los Angeles) was se- dren’s Research Hospital) was sity) is the recipient of the Life- Awards to Members lected as a 2017 Simons Investi- awarded the 2017 E. Donnall time Achievement Award of the gator by the Simons Foundation. Thomas Lecture and Prize by the Association for Computational American Society of Hematology. Linguistics. Nobel Prize in Chemistry, Clara D. Bloomfield (Ohio State 2017 University) is the recipient of the Carol Dweck (Stanford Univer- Christopher Hacon (University 2017 Robert A. Kyle Award for sity) was awarded the inaugural of Utah) was awarded the Break- Joachim Frank (Columbia Univer- Outstanding Clinician-Scientist, Yidan Prize. through Prize in Mathematics. sity) presented by the Mayo Clinic Di- vision of Hematology. Felton Earls (Harvard Univer- Naomi Halas (Rice University) sity) is the recipient of the 2018 was awarded the 2018 Julius Ed- Nobel Prize in Economic Emmanuel J.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1510.00844V3 [Cs.DC] 16 Nov 2016 Splitting (As Opposed to Replicating) Input Submatrices Across Processor Layers
    EXPLOITING MULTIPLE LEVELS OF PARALLELISM IN SPARSE MATRIX-MATRIX MULTIPLICATION ARIFUL AZAD∗, GREY BALLARDy , AYDIN BULUC¸ z , JAMES DEMMELx , LAURA GRIGORI{, ODED SCHWARTZk, SIVAN TOLEDO∗∗, AND SAMUEL WILLIAMSyy Abstract. Sparse matrix-matrix multiplication (or SpGEMM) is a key primitive for many high-performance graph algorithms as well as for some linear solvers, such as algebraic multigrid. The scaling of existing parallel implementations of SpGEMM is heavily bound by communication. Even though 3D (or 2.5D) algorithms have been proposed and theoretically analyzed in the flat MPI model on Erd}os-R´enyi matrices, those algorithms had not been implemented in practice and their complexities had not been analyzed for the general case. In this work, we present the first implementation of the 3D SpGEMM formulation that exploits multiple (intra-node and inter-node) levels of parallelism, achieving significant speedups over the state-of-the-art publicly available codes at all levels of concurrencies. We extensively evaluate our implementation and identify bottlenecks that should be subject to further research. Key words. Parallel computing, numerical linear algebra, sparse matrix-matrix multiplication, 2.5D algorithms, 3D algorithms, multithreading, SpGEMM, 2D decomposition, graph algorithms. AMS subject classifications. 05C50, 05C85, 65F50, 68W10 1. Introduction. Multiplication of two sparse matrices (SpGEMM) is a key operation for high-performance graph computations in the language of linear alge- bra [31, 40]. Examples include graph contraction [25], betweenness centrality [13], Markov clustering [47], peer pressure clustering [43], triangle counting [4], and cycle detection [49]. SpGEMM is also used in scientific computing. For instance, it is often a performance bottleneck for Algebraic Multigrid (AMG), where it is used in the set- up phase for restricting and interpolating matrices [7].
    [Show full text]
  • Claude Elwood Shannon (1916–2001) Solomon W
    Claude Elwood Shannon (1916–2001) Solomon W. Golomb, Elwyn Berlekamp, Thomas M. Cover, Robert G. Gallager, James L. Massey, and Andrew J. Viterbi Solomon W. Golomb Done in complete isolation from the community of population geneticists, this work went unpublished While his incredibly inventive mind enriched until it appeared in 1993 in Shannon’s Collected many fields, Claude Shannon’s enduring fame will Papers [5], by which time its results were known surely rest on his 1948 work “A mathematical independently and genetics had become a very theory of communication” [7] and the ongoing rev- different subject. After his Ph.D. thesis Shannon olution in information technology it engendered. wrote nothing further about genetics, and he Shannon, born April 30, 1916, in Petoskey, Michi- expressed skepticism about attempts to expand gan, obtained bachelor’s degrees in both mathe- the domain of information theory beyond the matics and electrical engineering at the University communications area for which he created it. of Michigan in 1936. He then went to M.I.T., and Starting in 1938 Shannon worked at M.I.T. with after spending the summer of 1937 at Bell Tele- Vannevar Bush’s “differential analyzer”, the an- phone Laboratories, he wrote one of the greatest cestral analog computer. After another summer master’s theses ever, published in 1938 as “A sym- (1940) at Bell Labs, he spent the academic year bolic analysis of relay and switching circuits” [8], 1940–41 working under the famous mathemati- in which he showed that the symbolic logic of cian Hermann Weyl at the Institute for Advanced George Boole’s nineteenth century Laws of Thought Study in Princeton, where he also began thinking provided the perfect mathematical model for about recasting communications on a proper switching theory (and indeed for the subsequent mathematical foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematics Calendar
    Mathematics Calendar Please submit conference information for the Mathematics Calendar through the Mathematics Calendar submission form at http:// www.ams.org/cgi-bin/mathcal-submit.pl. The most comprehensive and up-to-date Mathematics Calendar information is available on the AMS website at http://www.ams.org/mathcal/. June 2014 Information: http://www.tesol.org/attend-and-learn/ online-courses-seminars/esl-for-the-secondary- 1–7 Modern Time-Frequency Analysis, Strobl, Austria. (Apr. 2013, mathematics-teacher. p. 429) * 2–30 Algorithmic Randomness, Institute for Mathematical Sciences, 2–5 WSCG 2014 - 22nd International Conference on Computer National University of Singapore, Singapore. Graphics, Visualization and Computer Vision 2014, Primavera Description: Activities 1. Informal Collaboration: June 2–8, 2014. 2. Hotel and Congress Centrum, Plzen (close to Prague), Czech Repub- Ninth International Conference on Computability, Complexity and lic. (Jan. 2014, p. 90) Randomness (CCR 2014): June 9–13, 2014. The conference series 2–6 AIM Workshop: Descriptive inner model theory, American “Computability, Complexity and Randomness” is centered on devel- Institute of Mathematics, Palo Alto, California. (Mar. 2014, p. 312) opments in Algorithmic Randomness, and the conference CCR 2014 2–6 Computational Nonlinear Algebra, Institute for Computational will be part of the IMS programme. The CCR has previously been held and Experimental Research in Mathematics, (ICERM), Brown Univer- in Cordoba 2004, in Buenos Aires 2007, in Nanjing 2008, in Luminy sity, Providence, Rhode Island. (Nov. 2013, p. 1398) 2009, in Notre Dame 2010, in Cape Town 2011, in Cambridge 2012, and in Moscow 2013; it will be held in Heidelberg 2015. 3. Informal 2–6 Conference on Ulam’s type stability, Rytro, Poland.
    [Show full text]
  • Marconi Society - Wikipedia
    9/23/2019 Marconi Society - Wikipedia Marconi Society The Guglielmo Marconi International Fellowship Foundation, briefly called Marconi Foundation and currently known as The Marconi Society, was established by Gioia Marconi Braga in 1974[1] to commemorate the centennial of the birth (April 24, 1874) of her father Guglielmo Marconi. The Marconi International Fellowship Council was established to honor significant contributions in science and technology, awarding the Marconi Prize and an annual $100,000 grant to a living scientist who has made advances in communication technology that benefits mankind. The Marconi Fellows are Sir Eric A. Ash (1984), Paul Baran (1991), Sir Tim Berners-Lee (2002), Claude Berrou (2005), Sergey Brin (2004), Francesco Carassa (1983), Vinton G. Cerf (1998), Andrew Chraplyvy (2009), Colin Cherry (1978), John Cioffi (2006), Arthur C. Clarke (1982), Martin Cooper (2013), Whitfield Diffie (2000), Federico Faggin (1988), James Flanagan (1992), David Forney, Jr. (1997), Robert G. Gallager (2003), Robert N. Hall (1989), Izuo Hayashi (1993), Martin Hellman (2000), Hiroshi Inose (1976), Irwin M. Jacobs (2011), Robert E. Kahn (1994) Sir Charles Kao (1985), James R. Killian (1975), Leonard Kleinrock (1986), Herwig Kogelnik (2001), Robert W. Lucky (1987), James L. Massey (1999), Robert Metcalfe (2003), Lawrence Page (2004), Yash Pal (1980), Seymour Papert (1981), Arogyaswami Paulraj (2014), David N. Payne (2008), John R. Pierce (1979), Ronald L. Rivest (2007), Arthur L. Schawlow (1977), Allan Snyder (2001), Robert Tkach (2009), Gottfried Ungerboeck (1996), Andrew Viterbi (1990), Jack Keil Wolf (2011), Jacob Ziv (1995). In 2015, the prize went to Peter T. Kirstein for bringing the internet to Europe. Since 2008, Marconi has also issued the Paul Baran Marconi Society Young Scholar Awards.
    [Show full text]
  • President's Report
    AWM ASSOCIATION FOR WOMEN IN MATHE MATICS Volume 36, Number l NEWSLETTER March-April 2006 President's Report Hidden Help TheAWM election results are in, and it is a pleasure to welcome Cathy Kessel, who became President-Elect on February 1, and Dawn Lott, Alice Silverberg, Abigail Thompson, and Betsy Yanik, the new Members-at-Large of the Executive Committee. Also elected for a second term as Clerk is Maura Mast.AWM is also pleased to announce that appointed members BettyeAnne Case (Meetings Coordi­ nator), Holly Gaff (Web Editor) andAnne Leggett (Newsletter Editor) have agreed to be re-appointed, while Fern Hunt and Helen Moore have accepted an extension of their terms as Member-at-Large, to join continuing members Krystyna Kuperberg andAnn Tr enk in completing the enlarged Executive Committee. I look IN THIS ISSUE forward to working with this wonderful group of people during the coming year. 5 AWM ar the San Antonio In SanAntonio in January 2006, theAssociation for Women in Mathematics Joint Mathematics Meetings was, as usual, very much in evidence at the Joint Mathematics Meetings: from 22 Girls Just Want to Have Sums the outstanding mathematical presentations by women senior and junior, in the Noerher Lecture and the Workshop; through the Special Session on Learning Theory 24 Education Column thatAWM co-sponsored withAMS and MAA in conjunction with the Noether Lecture; to the two panel discussions thatAWM sponsored/co-sponsored.AWM 26 Book Review also ran two social events that were open to the whole community: a reception following the Gibbs lecture, with refreshments and music that was just right for 28 In Memoriam a networking event, and a lunch for Noether lecturer Ingrid Daubechies.
    [Show full text]