Premature Ventricular Contractions: Reassure Or Refer?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Premature Ventricular Contractions: Reassure Or Refer? REVIEW CME EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVE: Readers will perform the initial assessment and treatment of ventricular contractions, CREDIT referring appropriate patients to a cardiologist BARIS AKDEMIR, MD HIRAD YARMOHAMMADI, MD, MPH M. CHADI ALRAIES, MD, FACP WAYNE O. ADKISSON, MD, FHRS, FACC Cardiovascular Division, Cardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota Cardiovascular Division, Cardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis University of Minnesota Medical School, Medical School, Minneapolis Medical School, Minneapolis Minneapolis Premature ventricular contractions: Reassure or refer? ABSTRACT octor, my heart ______.” Fill in the blank D with: skips, flip-flops, hiccups, stops, beats When patients present with palpitations, the primary care in my throat or chest, or any of the various physician can perform the initial evaluation and treat- ways patients describe palpitations. One can- ment for premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). Many not practice clinical medicine and not see pa- patients need only reassurance and do not need to see a tients with some variation of this chief com- cardiologist. plaint.1–3 Not every patient who complains of palpitations will be found to have premature KEY POINTS ventricular contractions (PVCs), but PVCs The focus of the initial evaluation is to determine wheth- are often part of the clinical problem. This review focuses on the initial evalua- er there is underlying structural heart disease. If there is, tion and management of PVCs in the primary early referral to a specialist is probably warranted. care setting (Figure 1). It is not intended to be a comprehensive review of the pathophysi- Idiopathic PVCs (in which there is no structural heart ology, electrophysiology, or localization and disease) have a benign prognosis. ablation of PVCs. We will discuss approaches to the initial therapy of symptomatic PVCs. Treatment of PVCs is indicated for relief of symptoms if We will not discuss catheter-based therapy in reassurance is not sufficient. detail except for which patients might benefit from referral to a clinical cardiac electrophysi- ologist. Patients who have a high PVC burden (> 10% of total Findings that should prompt consideration heartbeats, though this is a subject of debate) should for referral to a specialist (“red flags”) are sum- have an evaluation of their systolic function. If it is marized at the end of each section. The type of normal at baseline, periodic follow-up echocardiograms specialist depends to a degree on the cardiolo- should be considered. gy practice available to the referring physician. In our practice, such patients are typically seen Patients with a very high burden (> 20%) are at high risk by an electrophysiologist. In other practices, a of arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy. In these patients, general cardiologist might see such patients initially. referral is prudent, as some patients may opt for more aggressive treatment of their PVCs. ■ INITIAL EVALUATION A primary concern of any patient presenting In patients with severe symptoms for whom medical with a new symptom is whether the symptom management has failed, referral for consideration of is a marker of serious risk to health or life. In a catheter ablation is reasonable. patient with palpitations, the answer depends in large part on whether he or she has under- lying structural heart disease—and that is the doi:10.3949/ccjm.83a.15090 focus of the initial evaluation. 524 CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE VOLUME 83 • NUMBER 7 JULY 2016 Downloaded from www.ccjm.org on September 23, 2021. For personal use only. All other uses require permission. AKDEMIR AND COLLEAGUES Palpitations demonstrated to be due to PVCs History of heart disease or surgery? Or Evidence of heart disease on examination or testing? Yes No Consider referral Symptoms for evaluation of heart disease and treatment Moderate or severe None or mild of PVCs Beta-blocker Reassurance or nondihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist Consider referral No Adequate response? Yes High PVC burden?a for treatment of PVCs Yes Periodic assessment of left ventricular function a The definition of “high” is unsettled. For very high PVC burdens (> 20%), referral is reasonable (see text for details). FIGURE 1. Algorithm for managing premature ventricular complexes (PVCs). Any patient who has a History: Information to ascertain ter? If they occur at rest, does activity make • When did the patient first notice the pal- them better or worse? new symptom pitations? • Are there symptoms of heart failure, such wants to know • Had there been any significant life events, as dyspnea on exertion, early fatigue, decline either illness or emotional stress, at the time in exercise or exertional capacity, orthopnea, whether it is the palpitations began? or paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea? a marker • Does the patient have a known history of • Are there symptoms suggesting cardiac of serious risk heart disease (myocardial infarction, heart ischemia, such as substernal chest pain or dis- surgery, valvular heart disease, heart failure)? comfort, chest pain or discomfort brought on to health or life • What medications is the patient taking? by or made worse by exertion, or chest pain • Does the patient take any dietary or health relieved with rest or sublingual nitroglycerin? supplements? Ask specifically about any sup- • Have the palpitations ever been associated plements taken to help with weight loss or with syncope? Keep in mind that syncope is increase energy levels. Almost all of them transient loss of consciousness that spontane- contain caffeine or other “natural” sympatho- ously resolves with no features to suggest sei- mimetic agents. Also ask specifically about il- zures.4 Thus, a patient who reports he or she licit drug use. If the patient is accompanied by “blacks out” with the palpitations but never a parent or partner, this question can be chal- falls or slumps has not had loss of conscious- lenging. ness and therefore has not had syncope.5 • When do the palpitations occur? At random? • Is there any history of unexplained death At rest? With exercise? Time of day? In relation in the family, especially in younger people? to the menstrual cycle? (More about this later.) Is there a history of unexplained accidental • Does anything make the palpitations bet- death in young family members? CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE VOLUME 83 • NUMBER 7 JULY 2016 525 Downloaded from www.ccjm.org on September 23, 2021. For personal use only. All other uses require permission. PVCs: REASSURE OR REFER? Red flags obtained from the history ■ FURTHER EVALUATION: • Syncope related to palpitations EXTENDED MONITORING • Palpitations triggered by activity or exer- With luck, the patient’s typical palpitations tion will occur during ECG, in which case the • Known significant heart disease, congeni- palpitations can reasonably be attributed to tal heart disease, or history of heart surgery PVCs. If not, monitoring is required to estab- • Family history of premature unexplained lish the cause of the patient’s symptoms. sudden death in a first-degree relative. The type of monitoring to order depends Physical examination on the frequency of the palpitations. If the The physical examination should focus on de- patient reports several episodes per day, then tecting any signs of underlying heart or vascu- a 24- or 48-hour Holter monitor should both lar disease, eg: allow for a diagnosis and document the PVC • Significant murmurs burden (ie, the percent of the patient’s heart- • Abnormal S3 or S4 beats that are PVCs), or the burden of what- • Displaced and diffuse point of maximal im- ever is the cause of the patient’s palpitations. pulse or precordial heave If the palpitations are less frequent, a • Signs of right or left heart failure, or both, 14-to-30-day monitor should be considered. A eg, peripheral edema, elevation of jugular standard event recorder can confirm that the venous pulse, rales, S3, S4. palpitations are due to PVCs but does not tell you the PVC burden. For that, a system ca- Electrocardiography pable of mobile outpatient cardiac telemetry We consider 12-lead electrocardiography is needed. Several such systems are commer- (ECG) a part of the initial examination and cially available. assessment, not an ancillary test. One cannot A Holter monitor or other monitoring evaluate a patient’s complaint of palpitations system is useful in determining whether the without ECG. Ideally, ECG should include PVCs are unifocal (all look the same) or mul- In a patient a long 12-lead rhythm strip. The clinician tifocal (have more than one morphology) and should look for any evidence of underlying whether, in addition to PVCs, the patient has with structural heart disease, eg: nonsustained ventricular tachycardia or sus- palpitations, • Pathologic Q waves tained ventricular tachycardia (by definition 12-lead ECG • Long QT interval lasting longer than 30 seconds or associated • ST-segment elevation in leads V1 and V2 with symptoms of hemodynamic compromise is part of consistent with a Brugada pattern such as near-syncope). Even if the patient has the initial • Epsilon waves (seen in right ventricular ar- nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, if the rhythmogenic cardiomyopathy). heart is structurally normal the prognosis re- assessment, Examples of the above can be found at mains excellent. not ancillary sites such as ecgpedia.org. Given the importance of knowing wheth- testing er the patient has structural heart disease, we Red flags in the physical examination have a low threshold for ordering echocar- and ECG diography, especially if nonsustained ventric- Any of the above findings on physical exami- ular tachycardia has been documented. The nation or ECG should prompt consideration finding of significant systolic dysfunction on of early referral, even though we have yet echocardiography should prompt a cardiology to establish that the palpitations are due to consultation even if the physical examination PVCs. Early consultation is suggested not for is normal. In patients who have a high PVC treatment of the palpitations but for further burden, echocardiography is used to monitor evaluation of structural heart disease.
Recommended publications
  • Abnormalities Caused by Left Bundle Branch Block - Print Article - JAAPA
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Physician Assistant Studies Faculty Research and Physician Assistant Studies, Department Publications 12-17-2010 Abnormalities Caused by Left undB le Branch Block James F. Ginter Aurora Cardiovascular Services Patrick Loftis Marquette University, [email protected] Published version. Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants, Vol. 23, No. 12 (December 2010). Permalink. © 2010, American Academy of Physician Assistants and Haymarket Media Inc. Useded with permission. Abnormalities caused by left bundle branch block - Print Article - JAAPA http://www.jaapa.com/abnormalities-caused-by-left-bundle-branch-block/... << Return to Abnormalities caused by left bundle branch block James F. Ginter, MPAS, PA-C, Patrick Loftis, PA-C, MPAS, RN December 17 2010 One of the keys to achieving maximal cardiac output is simultaneous contraction of the atria followed by simultaneous contraction of the ventricles. The cardiac conduction system (Figure 1) coordinates the polarization and contraction of the heart chambers. As reviewed in the earlier segment of this department on right bundle branch block (RBBB), the process begins with a stimulus from the sinoatrial (SA) node. The stimulus is then slowed in the atrioventricular (AV) node, allowing complete contraction of the atria. From there, the stimulus proceeds to the His bundle and then to the left and right bundle branches. The bundle branches are responsible for delivering the stimulus to the Purkinje fibers of the left and right ventricles at the same speed, which allows simultaneous contraction of the ventricles. Bundle branch blocks are common disorders of the cardiac conduction system. They can affect the right bundle, the left bundle, or one of its branches (fascicular block), or they may occur in combination.
    [Show full text]
  • Postural Heart Block*
    Br Heart J: first published as 10.1136/hrt.44.2.221 on 1 August 1980. Downloaded from Case reports Br Heart J 1980; 44: 221-3 Postural heart block* PETER E SEDA, JOHN H McANULTY, C JOE ANDERSON From the Department of Medicine, University of Oregon Health Sciences Center, Portland, Oregon, USA SUMMARY A patient presented with orthostatic dizziness and syncope caused by postural heart block. When the patient was supine, atrioventricular conduction was normal and he was asymptomatic; when he was standing he developed second degree type II block and symptoms. The left bundle-branch block on his electrocardiogram and intracardiac electrophysiological study findings suggest that this heart block occurred distal to the His bundle. Orthostatic symptoms are usually presumed to be secondary to an inappropriate distribution of intravascular volume or to autonomic nervous system abnormalities. As shown in this patient, these symptoms may be the result of orthostatic heart block. Ambulatory monitoring may be useful in patients with orthostatic neurological symptoms, particularly when conduction abnormalities are present on the electrocardiogram. Orthostatic neurological symptoms usually result minute and regular, and increased to 90 beats a from inadequate cerebral perfusion caused by minute with some irregularity when he was upright. disturbances of the autonomic nervous system,'-3 The carotid pulse was normal, and there were no ineffective or inappropriate shifts in volume carotid bruits. The cardiac impulse was normal. http://heart.bmj.com/ distribution,4 or drugs.5 We report a patient with The second heart sound was paradoxically split. orthostatic dizziness and syncope caused by inter- There was a grade 2/6 apical systolic murmur.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Implications of Electrocardiographic Bundle Branch Block in Primary Care
    Cardiac risk factors and prevention ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE Heart: first published as 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314295 on 25 May 2019. Downloaded from Clinical implications of electrocardiographic bundle branch block in primary care Peter Vibe Rasmussen, 1,2 Morten Wagner Skov,2,3 Jonas Ghouse,2,3 Adrian Pietersen,4 Steen Møller Hansen,5 Christian Torp-Pedersen,5,6 Lars Køber,3,7 Stig Haunsø,2,3,7 Morten Salling Olesen,2,8 Jesper Hastrup Svendsen,3,7 Jacob Melgaard,6 Claus Graff,6 Anders Gaardsdal Holst,3,9 Jonas Bille Nielsen2,10,11 ► Additional material is ABSTRact In the primary care setting, patients are referred published online only. To view Objectives Electrocardiographic bundle branch block for 12-lead standard ECG recording based on a please visit the journal online broad range of indications, ranging from typical (http:// dx. doi. org/ 10. 1136/ (BBB) is common but the prognostic implications in heartjnl- 2018- 314295). primary care are unclear. We sought to investigate the symptoms of CV disease to more diffuse symptoms relationship between electrocardiographic BBB subtypes as well as monitoring of medical treatment (eg, QTc For numbered affiliations see and the risk of cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in a primary interval-prolonging drugs) or as part of a routine end of article. care population free of major CV disease. health check. Opportunistic ECG recordings Methods Retrospective cohort study of primary care will often result in identification of various BBB Correspondence to subtypes. However, to the best of our knowledge, Peter Vibe Rasmussen, patients referred for electrocardiogram (ECG) recording Department of Cardiology, between 2001 and 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Intra-His Bundle Block. Clinical, Electrocardiographic, and Electrophysiologic Characteristics
    Andréa et al OriginalArq Bras Article Cardiol Intra-His bundle 2002; 79: 532-7. Intra-His Bundle Block. Clinical, Electrocardiographic, and Electrophysiologic Characteristics Eduardo M. Andréa, Jacob Atié, Washington A. Maciel, Nilson A. de Oliveira Jr, Luiz Eduardo Camanho, Luís Gustavo Belo, Hecio Affonso de Carvalho, Leonardo Siqueira, Eduardo Saad, Ana Claudia Venancio Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brazil Objective - To assess the clinical, electrocardiogra- Atrioventricular block is a conduction disturbance at phic, and electrophysiologic characteristics of patients the axis formed by the atrium, AV node, His bundle, and its (pt) with intra-His bundle block undergoing an electro- branches, which may vary from a mild delay in conduction physiologic study (EPS). (first-degree atrioventricular block) to a conduction block between atria and ventricles (second- and third-degree Methods - We analyzed the characteristics of 16 pt with atrioventricular blocks) 1. second-degree atrioventricular block and symptoms of Atrioventricular block may occur at the 3 following syncope or dyspnea, or both, undergoing conventional EPS. electrophysiological levels: atrioventricular node, within 2 Results - Intra-His bundle block was documented in 16 the His bundle, and below the His bundle . These levels pt during an EPS. In 15 (94%) pt, the atrioventricular block have anatomical correlation with, respectively, the atrioven- was recorded in sinus rhythm; 4 (25%) pt had intra-His tricular node, the penetrating His bundle (within the central Wenckebach phenomenon, which correlated with Mobitz I fibrous body), and nonpenetrating His bundle (out of the (MI) atrioventricular block on the electrocardiogram. Seven central fibrous body). First-degree atrioventricular block (44%) pt had 2:1 atrioventricular block, 2 of whom were usually has a delay in the conduction within the atrioventri- asymptomatic (12.5%).
    [Show full text]
  • ST-Segment Elevation in Conditions Other Than Acute Myocardial Infarction
    The new england journal of medicine review article current concepts ST-Segment Elevation in Conditions Other Than Acute Myocardial Infarction Kyuhyun Wang, M.D., Richard W. Asinger, M.D., and Henry J.L. Marriott, M.D. From the Hennepin County Medical Cen- cute myocardial infarction resulting from an occlusive ter, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis thrombus is recognized on an electrocardiogram by ST-segment elevation.1 (K.W., R.W.A.); and the University of South a 2-4 Florida, Tampa (H.J.L.M.). Address reprint Early reperfusion therapy has proved beneficial in such infarctions. The requests to Dr. Wang at the Hennepin earlier the reperfusion, the greater the benefit, and the time to treatment is now consid- County Medical Center, Cardiology Division, ered to indicate the quality of care. These days, when thrombolytic treatment and per- 701 Park Ave., MC 865A, Minneapolis, MN 55415. cutaneous intervention are carried out so readily, it is important to remember that acute infarction is not the only cause of ST-segment elevation. The purpose of this review is N Engl J Med 2003;349:2128-35. to describe other conditions that mimic infarction and emphasize the electrocardio- Copyright © 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society. graphic clues that can be used to differentiate them from true infarction. normal st-segment elevation and normal variants The level of the ST segment should be measured in relation to the end of the PR seg- ment, not the TP segment.5 In this way, ST-segment deviation can still be detected ac- curately, even if the TP segment is not present because the P wave is superimposed on the T wave during sinus tachycardia or if the PR segment is depressed or there is a prominent atrial repolarization (Ta) wave.
    [Show full text]
  • Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter with Left Bundle Branch Block Aberration Referred As Ventricular Tachycardia
    CONTRIBUTION 9H Atrial fibrillation and flutter with left bundle branch block aberration referred as ventricular tachycardia RICHARD G. TROHMAN, MD; KENNETH M. KESSLER, MD; DEBORAH WILLIAMS, MD; AND JAMES D. MALONEY, MD • Five patients were referred for electrophysiologic evaluation of nonsustained or sustained ventricular tachycardia. In each patient, the clinical rhythm disturbance was reproduced and identified as atrial fibrillation or flutter with left bundle branch block aberrancy. All five patients demonstrated enhanced or accelerated atrioventricular conduction through the normal atrioventricular nodal-His Purkinje pathway. This rapid conduction created an electrophysiologic substrate suitable to the preferential development of this less common form of aberration. Four of five patients responded well (ventricular rate control or reversion to sinus rhythm) to verapamil therapy. Electrocardiographic criteria for differentiating supraventricular tachycardia with aberration from ventricular tachycardia exist. Never- theless, misdiagnosis of wide complex tachycardia remains common. Electrophysiologic testing plays an important role in correctly identifying these rhythms, assessing long-term prognosis, and choosing effective therapy. • INDEX TERMS: LEFT BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK ABERRANCY; ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AND FLUTTER 0 CLEVE CLIN ] MED 1991; 58:325-330 tween these rhythm disturbances is of obvious clinical importance. Our report describes the results of electro- physiologic testing in five patients referred for evalua- LECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC
    [Show full text]
  • An Incarcerated Diaphragmatic Hernia Presenting As Acute Chest Pain and Transient Left Bundle Branch Block: a Case Report
    Al-Khalasi et al., Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc International Journal of Cardiology and Dis 2021; 1(2):48-51. Cardiovascular Diseases Case Report An incarcerated diaphragmatic hernia presenting as acute chest pain and transient left bundle branch block: A case report Usama AL-Khalasi1*, Masoud S. Kashoub2, Hatim Al Lawati3 1Oman Medical Specialty Board Abstract (OMSB) Resident, Emergency Medicine Program, PGY3, Oman Background: Hiatal hernia is not an uncommon condition; however, a large hernia producing symptoms that mimic an acute cardiac condition is extremely uncommon. This clinical case report highlights unusual 2 Oman Medical Specialty Board (OMSB) presentation of hiatal hernia where early recognition and timely intervention were key to ensure favorable Resident, Internal Medicine Program, patient outcome. PGY3, Oman 3 Case summary: We report the case of a 52 years old gentleman with a history of ABO-incompatible living Senior Consultant, Interventional donor liver transplant for hepatitis B related hepatocellular carcinoma, who presented with acute pericarditis Cardiology & Structural Heart Disease, SQUH, Oman like chest pain. Physical examination was unremarkable apart from moderate distress due chest pain. His 12- lead electrocardiogram (ECG) showed a new left bundle branch block (LBBB) with secondary repolarization *Author for correspondence: abnormalities. High sensitivity Troponin-T was serially normal. The total white blood cell count was mildly Email: [email protected] elevated with normal C reactive protein. A plain chest radiograph showed gas-filled bowel loops in left hemithorax. Further evaluation with computed tomography (CT) showed a 4-5cm left diaphragmatic defect Received date: October 02, 2020 Accepted date: March 10, 2021 with bowel loops herniating into the left mediastinum.
    [Show full text]
  • Successful Radiofrequency Ablation of Para-Left Bundle Branch Premature
    Case Report Interventional Cardiology Successful radiofrequency ablation of para-left bundle branch premature Leonor Parreira*, Dinis Mesquita, Rita Marinheiro, Rita Marinheiro, ventricular contractions: Aiming Duarte Chambel, Pedro Amador, at the breakout point to spare the Rui Caria Department of Cardiology, Centro Hospitalar de Setúbal–Hospital de São Bernardo, conduction system Rua Camilo Castelo Branco, 175. 2900-400 Setubal, Portugal Abstract: *Author for correspondence: Background: The origin of the arrhythmia and its breakout point may be located apart. This has been Leonor Parreira, Department of Cardiology, Centro Hospitalar de Setúbal–Hospital de described for arrhythmias originating within the His-Purkinje system. Case presentation: We report São Bernardo, Rua Camilo Castelo Branco, a case of a 70-year-old man with right bundle branch block and left anterior fascicular block with 175. 2900-400 Setubal, Portugal, E-mail: idiopathic nonsustained ventricular tachycardia originating in the septal left ventricular outflow close [email protected] to the proximal left bundle branch. Ablation was successfully and safely performed away from the Received date: December 02, 2020 origin of the arrhythmia near the left anterior fascicle, at the breakout point. Arrhythmias from the Accepted date: December 25, 2020 Published date: January 01, 2021 conduction system may have different preferential exits and meticulous activation sequence mapping is the preferable strategy to select the ablation site. Keywords: Left ventricular outflow tract . Premature ventricular contractions . Membranous septum . Radiofrequency ablation . Right bundle branch block Introduction Idiopathic Premature Ventricular Contractions (PVCs) arise more frequently from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) followed by the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract (LVOT), mainly from the aortic cusps [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Nci 10790713 2008 19 4 479.Pdf
    AACN19_4_479–484 22/10/08 11:44 PM Page 479 AACN Advanced Critical Care Volume 19, Number 4, pp.479–484 © 2008, AACN ECG Challenges Carol Jacobson, RN, MN Department Editor Understanding Atrioventricular Blocks, Part I: First-Degree and Second-Degree Atrioventricular Blocks Carol Jacobson, RN, MN he electrocardiographic diagnosis of AV blocks presents a challenge to T health care professionals who monitor cardiac rhythms. Much of the con- fusion exists as a result of differing definitions of the “degrees” of AV blocks in the literature, especially surrounding second-degree block. Many misconcep- tions exist about the definitions of type I and type II blocks and how these “types” differ from the “degrees” used in the AV block classification system. Additional sources of confusion and difference of opinion are (1) the concept of 2:1 conduction and (2) where to put blocks that involve failed conduction of 2 or more consecutive P waves.1 With this much uncertainty and difference of opinion among the experts, it is no wonder that instructors have a hard time explaining and teaching these concepts to students in cardiac arrhythmia inter- pretation classes. The term heart block or AV block refers to the problems associated with the conduction of an electrical impulse from the atria to the ventricles. The conduction can be delayed, intermittent, or absent. The classification system typically used to describe these “degrees” of conduction delay is still widely used in textbooks: First-degree AV block (delayed conduction) Second-degree AV block (intermittent conduction): type I and type II Third-degree or complete AV block (absent conduction) Marriott2 stated that the division into 3 degrees is too simple and proposed a much more detailed classification system to describe AV conduction distur- bances.
    [Show full text]
  • Continuing Problems with the Diagnosis of Mobitz Type II Second-Degree Atrioventricular Block
    Continuing Problems with the Diagnosis of Mobitz Type II Second-Degree Atrioventricular Block S. Serge BAROLD M.D.* Florida Heart Rhythm Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA ABSTRACT Second degree atrioventicular block remains poorly understood despite the major advances in cardiac elec- trophysiology. In this paper, we summarized the continuing problems with the diagnosis of Mobitz Type II second degree atrioventricular block. KEYWORDS Atrioventricular block, Second degree Möbitz type II atrioventricular block, Second degree type I atrioventricular block İkinci Derece Mobitz Tip II Atriyoventriküler Bloğun Tanısında Devam Eden Sorunlar ÖZET Kardiyak elektrofizyolojide büyük gelişmelere rağmen ikinci derece atriyoventriküler blok tam olarak anla- şılamamıştır. Bu yazıda ikinci derece Mobitz tip II atriyoventriküler bloğun tanısında devam eden sorunlar özetlenmiştir. ANAHTAR KELİMELER Atriyoventriküler blok, ikinci derece Mobitz tip II atriyoventriküler blok, ikinci derece tip I atriyoventriküler blok. İLETİŞİM ADRESİ S. Serge BAROLD, M.D. S. Serge Barold MD. 5806 Mariner’s Watch Drive, Tampa FL 33615, USA. Continuing Problems with the Diagnosis of Mobitz Type II Second-Degree Atrioventricular Block 55 econd-degree AV block remains poorly un- conducted P waves (i.e., 3:2 AV block) to deter- Sderstood despite the major advances in car- mine behavior of the PR interval (Figure 1). The diac electrophysiology in the last four deca- PR interval after the blocked impulse always des. The literature is replete with varying de- shortens if the P wave is conducted to the vent- finitions of second-degree AV block especially ricle. The term “inconstant” PR or AV intervals Mobitz type II block. It should therefore not be is important because many sequences of type I surprising that during formal testing, physici- second-degree AV block are atypical and do not ans score more poorly with second-degree AV conform to the traditional mathematical behavi- block ECGs than with those of other arrhythmi- or of the PR intervals described in standard text- as.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome Type B with Tachycardia-Dependent
    Br Heart J: first published as 10.1136/hrt.43.4.481 on 1 April 1980. Downloaded from Case reports Br HeartJ 1980; 43: 481-6 Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome type B with tachycardia-dependent (phase 3) block in the accessory pathway and in left bundle-branch coexisting with rate-unrelated right bundle-branch block IVAN J MENDOZA, AGUSTIN CASTELLANOS, RUEY J SUNG From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA suMMARY A patient with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome type B developed 2:1 atrioventricular block resulting from the association of persistent right bundle-branch block with tachycardia-dependent (phase 3) left bundle-branch block. Electrophysiological studies disclosed the coexistence of a tachy- cardia-dependent (phase 3) block in the accessory pathway. This conduction disturbance was exposed, not by carotid sinus massage as in previous studies, but by pacing-induced prolongation of the interval between two consecutively conducted atrial impulses. Furthermore, the surface electrocardiogram showed, at different times, ventricular complexes resulting from: (1) exclusive atrioventricular conduc- tion through the normal pathway without bundle-branch block; (2) predominant, or exclusive, atrio- ventricular conduction through a right-sided accessory pathway; (3) exclusive atrioventricular conduction http://heart.bmj.com/ through the normal pathway with right bundle-branch block; (4) exclusive conduction through the normal pathway, with left bundle-branch block; (5) fusion between (1) and (2); and finally, (6) fusion between (2) and (3) However, QRS complexes resulting from simultaneously occurring Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome type B and left bundle-branch block could not be identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Lyme Carditis Airley E
    Infect Dis Clin N Am 22 (2008) 275–288 Lyme Carditis a b Airley E. Fish, MD, MPH , Yuri B. Pride, MD , a, Duane S. Pinto, MD * aDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 1 Deaconess Road, Palmer 415, Boston, MA 02215, USA bDepartment of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Deaconess 311, Boston, MA 02215, USA Lyme borreliosis, or Lyme disease, is a globally occurring, systemic disease caused by the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi and transmitted by the Ixodes tick. The disease classically is divided into three stages. Stage 1, the early localized stage, generally occurs several days or up to 1 month after the initial tick bite. It is notable for an influenza-like illness and often is accompanied by the erythema migrans (EM) rash. Stage 2, the early dissem­ inated stage, occurs weeks to months after EM. Neurologic symptoms and musculoskeletal complaints are the hallmarks of this stage. Cardiac abnor­ malities, predominantly involving the conduction system and myocardium, also may manifest at this time. Stage 3 occurs several months to years after EM and is characterized by a monoarthritis or oligoarthritis affecting the large joints, and the development and progression of neurologic sequelae. Steere and colleagues first described the cardiovascular complications of Lyme disease nearly 30 years ago in a retrospective report of 20 North American cases. Australian and European cases were reported in the early to mid-1980s. The principal manifestation of Lyme carditis is self-limited conduction derangement, most commonly involving the atrioventricular node.
    [Show full text]